Comparison between general, spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a network meta-analysis

Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between general anesthesia and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in cesarean delivery for pregnancy complicated with placenta previa

BACKGROUND

Placenta previa (PP) involves abnormal placental implantation in the lower uterine segment, partially or completely covering the internal cervical os, and is linked to severe maternal hemorrhage and fetal complications. The optimal anesthetic method between general anesthesia (GA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for cesarean delivery (CD) with PP remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 550 PP-complicated CD cases from the Longitudinal Placenta Previa Study (LoPPS) conducted in Southwest China between January 2018 and December 2024. Patients received either GA (n = 170) or CSEA (n = 380). Sociodemographic, obstetric, perioperative, and neonatal data were compared. Multivariate linear and logistic regression was employed to assess the association between anesthetic methods and other perioperative factors, and intraoperative blood loss, or neonatal asphyxia while adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing GA had a higher age (32.4 vs 31.5 years, p = 0.020), higher body mass index (BMI) (26.5 vs 23.5 kg/m2, p < 0.001), and greater parity (91.8% vs 78.4%, p < 0.001) compared to those under CSEA. Complete PP was more common in the GA group (47.1% complete PP vs 19.0%, p < 0.001). There were also more placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) (48.8% vs 15.8%, p < 0.001) and hysterectomy (12.9% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001) in the GA group. In accordance with the huge differences in anesthesia indications, the GA group experienced significantly greater intraoperative blood loss (1131.77 ± 77.29 mL vs. 707.50 ± 16.87 mL, p < 0.001), along with correspondingly higher rates of transfusion, including red cell suspension, plasma, and autologous blood (p < 0.001). The incidence of neonatal asphyxia was also significantly higher in the GA group (26.5% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001), and the rate of preterm birth was notably higher (81.8% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.001). Among CSEA patients, increased blood loss was associated with placenta covering the uterine incision (HR = 58.49, p = 0.017), PAS type (HR = 29.02, p = 0.036), PP type (HR = 34.72, p = 0.048), and surgical duration (HR = 9.35, p < 0.001), while aortic balloon occlusion reduced blood loss (HR = -115.08, p = 0.009). In GA patients, similar risk factors were identified: placenta covering the incision (HR = 71.88, p = 0.015), PAS type (HR = 103.01, p = 0.042), PP type (HR = 106.16, p = 0.046), and surgical duration (HR = 13.83, p < 0.001). Aortic balloon occlusion remained protective in the GA group (HR = -300.01, p = 0.015), while GA (Exp(B) = 1.75, p = 0.002) and types of PAS are associated with increased risks of neonatal asphyxia.

CONCLUSION

CSEA is a safe option for selected cases of PP-related CD, particularly in the absence of PAS or in cases with milder forms of PP. Though the GA group exhibited greater intraoperative blood loss, due to the significant differences in the indications for anesthesia methods and the observational nature of current study, this should not be simply interpreted as a causative effect of GA on higher intraoperative blood loss. Thorough antenatal ultrasound assessment of placental status is critical. For complex cases, such as those involving severe PAS subtypes or complete PP, coordinated multidisciplinary perioperative management is essential.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2100052428, October 26th, 2021.

Correlation between pressure pain threshold and L4-5 supraspinous ligament biomechanics after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia

Background

Localized low back pain is a frequent complaint after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery (CD).

Objectives

This study aimed to examine the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and biomechanical properties (stiffness, elasticity, relaxation time, and creep) of the L4-5 supraspinous ligament at the spinal anesthesia needle insertion site in women who had CD. These measurements were compared with those from the controls who never had pregnancy or anesthesia, and correlations between the variables were explored.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study involved 44 women, divided into two groups. Group A: 22 women experienced spinal anesthesia for CD, and Group B: 22 women represented the controls. L4-5 supraspinous ligament's PPT was measured using pressure algometry, and its biomechanical properties were assessed with the MyotonPRO device.

Results

Significant differences were found in PPT between the two groups (P = 0.0001), but non-significant differences were observed in stiffness, elasticity, relaxation time, or creep (P = 0.318, 0.344, 0.241, and 0.227, respectively). There were also non-significant correlations between PPT and biomechanical properties.

Conclusion

Women who experienced spinal anesthesia for CD showed increased tenderness and lower PPT at the L4-5 site, 6–12 weeks postpartum, with minor changes in supraspinous ligament biomechanics. The relationship between PPT and these properties was negligible.

Correlation between pressure pain threshold and L4-5 supraspinous ligament biomechanics after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia

BackgroundLocalized low back pain is a frequent complaint after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery (CD).ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and biomechanical properties (stiffness, elasticity, relaxation time, and creep) of the L4-5 supraspinous ligament at the spinal anesthesia needle insertion site in women who had CD. These measurements were compared with those from the controls who never had pregnancy or anesthesia, and correlations between the variables were explored.MethodsA retrospective cohort study involved 44 women, divided into two groups. Group A: 22 women experienced spinal anesthesia for CD, and Group B: 22 women represented the controls. L4-5 supraspinous ligament's PPT was measured using pressure algometry, and its biomechanical properties were assessed with the MyotonPRO device.ResultsSignificant differences were found in PPT between the two groups (P = 0.0001), but non-significant differences were observed in stiffness, elasticity, relaxation time, or creep (P = 0.318, 0.344, 0.241, and 0.227, respectively). There were also non-significant correlations between PPT and biomechanical properties.ConclusionWomen who experienced spinal anesthesia for CD showed increased tenderness and lower PPT at the L4-5 site, 6-12 weeks postpartum, with minor changes in supraspinous ligament biomechanics. The relationship between PPT and these properties was negligible.

The Perioperative Neonatal and Maternal Glycemic Response and APGAR Score During Elective Cesarean Section: Factors and Anesthetic Management

Background

The type of anesthesia and intensity of pain experienced during surgery are linked to the body's stress response, as reflected in preoperative and postoperative glucose levels.

Objective

This comparative study aims to assess the hyperglycemic stress response to cesarean sections performed under different types of anesthesia.

Methods

This prospective study included 302 participants, divided into two groups: a general anesthesia group and a spinal anesthesia group. Our primary objective was to investigate the effects of general versus spinal anesthesia on pregnant women undergoing cesarean section. Secondarily, we aimed to assess the impact of other factors on the maternal and neonatal stress response during surgery.

Results

Both groups exhibited a significant proportional increase in mean blood glucose levels after surgery. However, this increase was more pronounced in the general anesthesia group than in the spinal anesthesia group. Therefore, spinal anesthesia had a greater effect in attenuating the hyperglycemic response to surgery during cesarean section compared to general anesthesia. Maternal blood glucose levels were significantly associated with steroid injection, type of anesthesia, and gestational age. In contrast, neonatal blood glucose was significantly associated with gestational age, APGAR score, maternal steroid injection, type of anesthesia, maternal age, and both preoperative and postoperative maternal blood glucose levels.

Conclusion

Spinal anesthesia was superior to general anesthesia in attenuating both maternal and neonatal hyperglycemic responses during the cesarean section. This highlights the significant impact of anesthesia type on maternal and neonatal well-being.

The duration of spinal anaesthesia in elective caesarean section in Trendelenburg and reverse Trendelenburg positions: a randomized clinical trial

Objective

One of the common methods of anaesthesia for caesarean sections (CSs) involves the use of spinal anaesthesia in mothers. Various positions are utilized in this method. This study aims to compare the evaluation of two positions, Trendelenburg and reverse Trendelenburg, in candidates for CS to assess the duration of anaesthesia and changes in vital signs in women.

Methods

This study was a randomized clinical trial in which 60 pregnant mothers who met the inclusion criteria entered the study. These mothers were randomly allocated into two equal groups using block randomization. One group of patients received spinal anaesthesia in the Trendelenburg position, while the other group received it in the Reverse Trendelenburg position. Vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, Apgar score, and SPO2) of participants from both groups were evaluated for 1 h after the induction of anaesthesia. Additionally, sensory level and duration of anaesthesia were measured. Finally, the data from both groups were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 26 software.

Results

The mean (SD) age of participating mothers in the Reverse Trendelenburg and Trendelenburg groups was 28.93 (5.82) and 30.97 (4.94), respectively. The two study groups did not significantly differ in baseline characteristics such as age, BMI, which could potentially impact vital sign outcomes or anaesthesia duration, and education (P>0.05). The mean (SD) duration of anaesthesia in the Trendelenburg position was significantly higher than in the Reverse Trendelenburg position [221.57(min) vs. 159.00(min)] (P<0.0001). There was no significant difference between the two positions, Trendelenburg and Reverse Trendelenburg, in terms of sensory level and its extent (P=0.08). The two study groups did not significantly differ in hemodynamic changes measured 13 times, including heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and Apgar score (P>0.05).

Conclusion

In spinal anaesthesia with the Trendelenburg position compared to the Reverse Trendelenburg position, there is a longer duration of anaesthesia. This is while the two positions did not differ in terms of hemodynamic changes and sensory level.

Comparison of the Effects of Anaesthesia Methods Used in Caesarean Delivery on Neonatal Cerebral and Renal Oxygenation: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Background: During a newborn's adaptation to extrauterine life, many changes take place that are influenced by various factors. The type of delivery and anaesthesia strategy utilised during labour can modify these adaptive modifications. In this regard, this study was designed to compare the effects of general and spinal anaesthesia on cerebral and renal oxygenation after elective caesarean deliveries. Methods: This randomised controlled study comprised sixty parturient women who were over 18 years old and had a gestational age between 37 and 41 weeks. All participants had an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification of II. Neonatal cerebral (CrSO2) and renal (RrSO2) regional oxygen saturations were assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy. Additionally, the 1st-5th min Apgar scores, preductal and postductal peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and perfusion index were recorded in both the general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of CrSO2 or RrSO2 values. The values of CrSO2 and RrSO2 in both groups showed a significant rise from the 10th to the 15th min, respectively. Conclusions: General and spinal anaesthesia techniques used for cesarean delivery have similar effects on neonatal cerebral and renal oxygenation.

Ultrasound-guided caudal anaesthesia combined with epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Although epidural anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia are currently the general choices for patients undergoing caesarean section, these two neuraxial anaesthesia methods still have drawbacks. Caudal anaesthesia has been considered to be more appropriate for gynaecological surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare epidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia and single-space epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section with respect to postoperative comfort and intraoperative anaesthesia quality.

METHODS

In this clinical trial, 150 patients undergoing elective caesarean section were recruited and randomized into three groups according to a ratio of 1:1:1to receive epidural anaesthesia only, spinal anaesthesia only or epidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia. The primary outcome was postoperative comfort in the three groups. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative anaesthesia quality and the incidences of nausea, vomiting, postdural puncture headache, maternal bradycardia, or hypotension.

RESULTS

More patients were satisfied with the intraoperative anaesthesia quality in the EAC group than in the EA group (P = 0.001). The obstetrician was more significantly satisfied with the intraoperative anaesthesia quality in the SA and EAC groups than in the EA group (P = 0.004 and 0.020, respectively). The parturients felt more comfortable after surgery in the EA and EAC groups (P = 0.007). The incidence of maternal hypotension during caesarean section was higher in the SA group than in the EA and EAC groups (P = 0.001 and 0.019, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia may be a better choice for elective caesarean section. Compared with epidural anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia, it has a higher quality of postoperative comfort and intraoperative anaesthesia.

ObsTIVA-UK: a service evaluation of obstetric total intravenous anaesthesia in the United Kingdom

We conducted a prospective observational service evaluation across the United Kingdom on the use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) for obstetric surgery between November 2022 and June 2023. The primary aim was to describe the incidence of TIVA for obstetric surgery within participating units, with secondary aims to describe maternal and neonatal postoperative recovery indicators. Of 184 maternity units in the United Kingdom, 30 (16%) contributed data to the service evaluation. There were 104 patients who underwent caesarean delivery under TIVA and 19 patients had TIVA for other reasons. Infusions of propofol and remifentanil were used in 100% and 84% of cases, respectively. Fifty-nine out of 103 live neonates (57%) required some form of respiratory support. Of the neonates with recorded data, 73% and 17% had Apgar scores < 7 at 1 and 5 min respectively. No neonates were recorded to have Apgar scores < 7 at 10 min. Further prospective research is required to investigate the impact of obstetric TIVA on maternal and neonatal outcomes and inform best practice recommendations.

Anesthetic Management of Cesarean Section in the Case of a Sextuplet Pregnancy and Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

Cesarean section in a mother with a sextuplet pregnancy is challenging for an anesthesiologist. Several perioperative complications are likely because of the overdistended uterus and associated changes in the mother. We are reporting the case of a woman with a sextuplet pregnancy who came for an emergency cesarean. She also had a background history of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and ovulation induction for conception. Early pregnancy was complicated by ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. She required cervical cerclage in early pregnancy. The emergency cesarean was done as she went into preterm labor and six premature babies were delivered at 29 weeks of gestation. Cesarean was done under spinal anesthesia. Preeclampsia and postpartum hemorrhage complicated the perioperative period.

A Five-Year Retrospective Closed Cohort Study to Find a Superior Anaesthetic Technique for Caesarean Section From a Haemodynamic Perspective

Background A cesarean section (CS) is common and requires a safe and effective anesthetic technique for the safety of both the mother and the fetus. This study aims to compare the intraoperative hemodynamic safety profile with general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) and propose a superior technique for cesarean from the hemodynamic perspective. Methods After obtaining ethical committee approval, a retrospective closed cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent cesarean with GA and RA. This study was conducted at a tertiary-level university hospital in Oman from January 2015 to December 2019. The investigators collected maternal and fetal data (hypotension, bradycardia, blood loss, APGAR score, fetal mortality, complications, and length of stay) from January 2015 to December 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative hypotension, and the secondary outcomes studied were significant blood loss and APGAR score in both anesthesia techniques. Results A total of 2500 cesarean patients were studied, of whom 1379 received RA and 1121 received GA. The overall hypotension (systolic BP<90 mm Hg) rate observed was 40.1%; it was significantly lower with GA as compared to RA (32.1% versus 46.5%, respectively, P<0.001, OR 0.545, 95% CI 0.462 to 0.643). Consequently, the requirement for vasopressors was low with GA compared to RA (1.6% versus 23.1%, P<0.001, OR 0.054, 95% CI 0.034 to 0.088). Blood loss (>1 L) was remarkably higher in GA as compared to the RA (15.5% versus 8.9%, respectively, P<0.001, OR 1.916, 95% CI 1.499 to 2.448). APGAR scores were lower with GA than RA (2.8% versus 0.9%, P<0.001). Bradycardia and fetal mortality were almost equal in both groups. Conclusion GA is associated with significantly better hemodynamic stability during the cesarean section.

2023 HRS expert consensus statement on the management of arrhythmias during pregnancy

This international multidisciplinary expert consensus statement is intended to provide comprehensive guidance that can be referenced at the point of care to cardiac electrophysiologists, cardiologists, and other health care professionals, on the management of cardiac arrhythmias in pregnant patients and in fetuses. This document covers general concepts related to arrhythmias, including both brady- and tachyarrhythmias, in both the patient and the fetus during pregnancy. Recommendations are provided for optimal approaches to diagnosis and evaluation of arrhythmias; selection of invasive and noninvasive options for treatment of arrhythmias; and disease- and patient-specific considerations when risk stratifying, diagnosing, and treating arrhythmias in pregnant patients and fetuses. Gaps in knowledge and new directions for future research are also identified.

The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia

Background The choice of anesthesia for an elective cesarean section should be based on an individual benefit-risk assessment, considering the pregnant woman's preferences, concerns, and the available medical expertise. This study aimed to determine the preferences for general and spinal anesthesia among women undergoing elective cesarean sections and the factors affecting their choice. Methods The study design is a cross-sectional study, and it was conducted on pregnant women to measure the acceptance of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in patients with elective cesarean sections in Saudi Arabia. Random pregnant women were invited to participate in this study across Saudi Arabia after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A digital questionnaire was distributed across Saudi Arabia to be filled out by female residents. A Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA) sheet was used for data entry, while IBM SPSS software version 27.0.1 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Results The study included 813 participants; most (28%) of them were 25-30 years old. Of the study participants, 54% had chosen spinal anesthesia before, 22% had chosen general anesthesia, and 24% had chosen neither. Reasons to choose general anesthesia were reported as follows: 21.6% feared pain during surgery, 24.2% feared watching the surgical procedures on their bodies, 16.6% feared back pain, 12.8% feared being paralyzed, and 15.1% feared needles used to administer anesthesia in the lower back. Reasons for choosing spinal anesthesia were reported as follows: 26.3% had back pain concerns; 13% feared prolonged unconsciousness; 9.6% feared having a headache after surgery; 17% had post-surgery pain concerns; 30.1% wanted to be alert at the time of the birth of the baby; 10.6% feared the chances of experiencing nausea and vomiting; and 7.4% feared not being able to breastfeed. Conclusion Spinal anesthesia was chosen by more participants than general anesthesia. There was a statistically significant association between choosing spinal anesthesia and the number of previous pregnancies, parity, history of preterm labor, and recommendation to undergo general or spinal anesthesia by non-medical staff. It was also significant with the older age and higher educational level of participants. This decision may be influenced by a number of variables, the most significant of which are prior experience with general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia, educational attainment, and non-medical advice.

Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Postdural Puncture Headache in Obstetric Anaesthesia

Objective

Intrathecal morphine is used as an effective component of multimodal analgesia in postoperative analgesia in cesarean section patients. We aimed to analyze the relationship between intrathecal morphine administration and postdural puncture headache (PDPH), pain score and analgesia consumption in the postoperative period, and maternal fetal effects.

Methods

One hundred four pregnant women aged ≥18 years (American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I or II, >36 weeks gestation) who were scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. Spinal anesthesia consisted of bupivacaine with or without morphine (Group M: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl + 100 mcg morphine; Group F: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl). The effect of intrathecal morphine on PDPH, postoperative pain score, analgesia consumption, and maternal and fetal effects were recorded for 5 days.

Results

PDPH developed in a total of 33 patients (Group M: 18 and Group F: 15, P=0.274). When we evaluated PDPH with the VAS, there was no significant difference between the groups. The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) was lower in the morphine group, and no statistically significant difference was found in the VAS 1st hr and VAS 2nd hr, whereas the VAS 6th hr and VAS 24th hr were found to be statistically significant. There was no difference in terms of PDPH, the first analgesic requirement and postoperative nausea-vomiting, but meperidine consumption was lower in the morphine group.

Conclusion

Low-dose intrathecal morphine did not affect the incidence of PDPH. It is an effective method that can be used in cesarean section patients without increasing the maternal and fetal side effects from postoperative analgesia.

Impact of planned versus emergency cesarean delivery on neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by abnormal placentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although planned cesarean delivery (PCD) is the mainstay of management for abnormal placentation, some patients still require emergency cesarean delivery (ECD). We aimed to systematically analyze the impact of various modes of delivery on neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

This study was complied with the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO (code: CRD42022379487). A systematic search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE and Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane databases. Data extracted included gestational age at delivery, birth weight, the Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, numbers of newborns with low Apgar score (<7) at 5 minutes, the rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission, and the rates of neonatal mortality.

RESULTS

Fifteen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 2565 women (2567 neonates) who underwent PCD (n = 1483) or ECD (n = 1082) for prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and/or placenta previa (PP). Compared with the ECD group, neonates in the PCD group had significantly higher gestational ages (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-3.15; P < .001), birth weights (SMD: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.00-2.27; P < .001), and Apgar scores at 1 minute (SMD: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.73; P < .001) and 5 minutes (SMD: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.25-0.70; P < .001). Additionally, the PCD group had significantly lower rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission (odds ratio [OR]: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.14-0.29; P < .001), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.11-0.69; P = .01), and neonatal mortality (OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.05-0.33; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

When pregnancies are complicated by abnormal placentation, PCD is linked to noticeably better neonatal outcomes than emergent delivery.

Comparison of 2 anesthetic protocols and surgical timing during cesarean section on neonatal vitality and umbilical cord blood parameters

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the mode of anesthesia, the time form the induction to the extraction of a puppy and the immediate postnatal vitality and umbilical cord blood gases parameters in cesarean section derived-puppies. Two different anesthetic protocols were used: inhalation using isoflurane (ISO) and combined-inhalation and epidural (EPI) with propofol being the induction agent.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in ISO group in pH values, pCO2 levels and Apgar scores between puppies at different extraction times (< 30 vs. ≥ 30 min). In ISO group puppies extracted later were more acidic (7.16 vs. 7.22), had higher levels of pCO2 (69 vs. 57 mmHg) and lower Apgar scores at birth (1.2 vs. 2.5). On the contrary, in EPI group no differences were observed between the delivery time, umbilical blood gas parameters and puppies' vitality. Furthermore, the dams from the EPI group required lower concentrations of isoflurane (MAC 1.11 ± 0.19 vs.1.37 ± 0.16, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple pregnancies frequent in dogs lead to significant differences in extraction times between the first and the last puppy during cesarean section. Obtained results showed that the mode of anesthesia and the surgical time would influence the neonatal outcome during cesarean section in dogs. The higher concentration of isoflurane with the longer time of exposure had a negative effect on the initial newborn vitality as well as the umbilical cord blood gas parameters. Therefore, when performing CS in giant dog breeds or expecting many puppies in the litter, it is worth considering epidural component that allow for lower concentrations of inhalant agents, which may contribute to a better clinical condition of newborns.

Preliminary study on fluid bolus administration for prevention of spinal hypotension in dogs undergoing elective cesarean section

Introduction

This study aimed to investigate the effect of fluid bolus administration during epidural anesthesia (coload) in female dogs scheduled for elective cesarean section (CS). Hypotension is one of the most common complications of epidural (EA) and spinal (SA) analgesia, and in the case of cesarean section, it may pose a significant risk for placental perfusion and subsequent fetal vitality and puppy survival.

Methods

Pregnant bitches scheduled for elective CS underwent EA with (treatment group) or without (control group) intravenous fluid bolus administration. The following parameters were measured and compared between both groups: HR, RR, etCO₂, SpO₂, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure were measured at three time points (T1: before surgery, T2: after the last puppy removal, and T3: end of surgery) in dams; vitality (Apgar score at 0, 5, and 20 min) and umbilical cord blood parameters (pH, pCO2, HCO3, base excess, lactate and glucose) in newborns.

Results

The results indicated that crystalloid coloading increased maternal systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure (treatment vs. control group, 101.46 ± 9.18, 48.01 ± 13.47, and 67.07 ± 13.15 mmHg vs. 80.68 ± 7.29, 36.52 ± 8.75, and 180 52.30 ± 7.77, p < 0.05) with significantly fewer episodes of hypotension. Additionally, puppies in the treatment group received higher scores in the 5-min (7.91 ± 1.67 vs. 6.74 ± 2.20) and 20-min (9.38 ± 0.87 vs. 8.39 ± 2.50) assessments without the favorable effect on umbilical blood gas parameters.

Discussion

Based on the obtained results, it can be stated that crystalloid coload offers an effective option in cases of hypotension during cesarean section, with clear benefits for both mothers and newborns.

THE EFFECT OF LAVENDER AROMATHERAPY ON THE LEVEL OF INTRAOPERATIVE ANXIETY IN CAESAREAN CASE UNDER SPINAL ANESTHESIA: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

BACKGROUND

Preoperative anxiety can be reduced by aromatherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of lavender aromatherapy in reducing intraoperative anxiety in patients undergoing caesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

This study was two-armed and randomized controlled trial. A total of 96 patients who were scheduled for CS were randomly divided into two groups: the aromatherapy (A) group (n=48), comprising patients who were randomized to receive lavender aromatherapy with mask oxygen after the birth of the baby, and the control (C) group (n=48), comprising patients who inhaled carrier oil. During the preoperative period, baseline anxiety levels and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-I) scale. After birth, two drops of oil were inhaled in an oxygen mask for 5 min. After 5 min, the Ramsey Sedation Scale was evaluated, and patients with a score of 1 received 2 mg of intravenous midazolam for sedation. The STAI-I and VAS pain scores were re-evaluated at the third postoperative hour.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was the significant reduction in the need for midazolam brought about by lavender aromatherapy, and the secondary outcomes included postoperative third-hour STAI-I scores, intraoperative complications and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of lavender aromatherapy, which reduced the need for intraoperative anxiolytics, can be offered as an alternative for pregnant women who undergo CS under spinal anesthesia.

Risk factors for conversion to general anesthesia for urgent cesarean among women with labor epidural analgesia: A retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVES

General anesthesia for cesarean is associated with an increased risk of maternal morbidity compared with neuraxial anesthesia. Reducing the rate of general anesthesia for urgent cesarean in women with epidural analgesia may improve maternal outcomes. Our objective was to identify the rate and factors associated with the conversion to general anesthesia for urgent cesarean among women with labor epidural analgesia.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective case-control study including singleton-laboring women with epidural analgesia who delivered after 37 gestational weeks by urgent cesarean (Port Royal Maternity unit, 2012-2017). Cases were all women who required conversion from neuraxial analgesia to general anesthesia. Controls were women just before and after each case included. Factors associated with the conversion to general anesthesia were identified using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 3,300 laboring women with an epidural analgesia who delivered by urgent cesarean during the study period, 113 (3.4%,) had a conversion to general anesthesia. Factors associated with conversion to general anesthesia were a cervical dilation ≥ 5 cm at the time of epidural placement (aOR 2.55, 95%CI 1.05-6.21), asymmetric sensory blockade (aOR 3.39, 95%CI 1.11-10.36), need for ≥2 rescue top-ups (aOR 2.88, 95%CI 1.29-6.44), and category 1 cesarean (aOR 3.61, 95%CI 1.77-7.33).

CONCLUSION

Among women with labor epidural analgesia, suboptimal analgesia significantly increased the risk for conversion to general anesthesia for urgent cesarean. Epidural placement without delay during labor, regular checks of epidural analgesia efficiency, and epidural replacement in case of inadequate epidural analgesia may decrease the rate of avoidable general anesthesia for urgent cesarean.

Impact of different types of anaesthesia for cesarean delivery on subacute low back pain intensity and disability: A retrospective cohort

Background. Low back pain (LBP) is common after cesarean delivery. So, this study was conducted to assess and compare the intensity of subacute LBP and disability among women who underwent cesarean delivery with different anaesthetic types. Methodology. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to 38 women “26 of them underwent cesarean delivery, assessed after 6 to 12 weeks from delivery, they were classified into: [epidural anaesthetic group (Group A) n = 6, spinal anaesthetic group (Group B) n = 13, general anaesthetic group (Group C) n = 7], they were either primiparous or multiparous who did not receive anaesthesia for at least one year prior to the last delivery, the other 12 women were the control group (Group D) who didn’t experience pregnancy or anaesthesia”. Results. The mean values of visual analogue scale (VAS) in Group A, Group B, Group C, and Group D were 5.00 ± 1.67, 4.62 ± 1.12, 5.14 ± 1.21, and 2.17 ± 0.71, respectively. The ANOVA test revealed a significant difference in VAS (P = 0.0001; P < 0.05) among the four groups. while the post-hoc test revealed non-significant differences (P = 1.000; P > 0.05) between the three anaesthetic groups. Also, the mean values of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in the same four groups were 26.00 ± 16.68, 27.00 ± 11.72, 30.00 ± 6.87, and 25.00 ± 9.33, respectively. The ANOVA test revealed non-significant difference in ODI (P = 0.838; P < 0.05) among the four groups. Conclusion. Epidural, spinal and general anaesthesia for cesarean delivery are associated with increased intensity of subacute LBP, but without significant differences between these anaesthetic types. However, they do not increase the disability.

Is an epidural component during general anaesthesia for caesarean section beneficial for neonatal puppies' health and vitality?

Regional centro-axial block is a recommended technique for uncomplicated caesarean section in human medicine. Since the application of regional anaesthesia as the only technique in veterinary medicine is impractical, the objective of the study was to assess and compare the epidural component of caesarean section (CS) on maternal and fetal outcomes. Bitches (n = 36) undergoing elective CS were enrolled in this study. Females were randomly assigned into two groups: Gr I (Isoflurane, n = 20) and Gr IE (Isoflurane plus Epidural, n = 16). Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. In the IE group, epidural anaesthesia was also performed using lidocaine. The maternal intraoperative parameters were compared at three time points: T1 - just before the skin incision, T2 - after the last puppy removal, and T3 - at the end of surgery. At least 100 mcl of mixed umbilical cord blood was collected for gas analysis. The modified Apgar scoring system (AS) was used to objectively score newborn health and vitality immediately after birth (0 min), 5 and 20 min after birth. Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure were lower in the IE group at T1, T2, and T3 compared to I group (p < 0.05). In the combined anaesthesia group blood pressure remained stable but low at all time points. Throughout surgery, the IE group required a lower concentration of isoflurane (p < 0.05). The median values of the umbilical blood gas results were found to be similar (p > 0.05) in both investigated groups. The initial results of the Apgar score were comparable in the I and IE groups (p > 0.05). However, subsequent AS measurements revealed significant differences between both groups. Puppies from the IE group received better AS scores at 5 and 20 min compared to the I group (median AS 8 and 9 vs. 5 and 8, respectively). The results obtained demonstrated that epidural anaesthesia administration reduced the requirement for isoflurane in dams undergoing caesarean section and despite episodes of maternal hypotension did not affect the results of neonatal umbilical blood gas. Furthermore, newborns from the epidural anaesthesia group improved more quickly postnatally, developing a satisfactory condition in a shorter time.

Total failure of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, associated factors, and outcomes: A retrospective case-control study

Spinal anesthesia is the anesthetic technique of choice for patients undergoing cesarean delivery. In the present study, total spinal anesthesia failure was defined as a case when an absent blockade or inadequate surgery required general anesthesia administration with an endotracheal tube. This study aimed to investigate factors related to this condition and report its maternal and neonatal outcomes. This retrospective matched case-control study was conducted by recruiting 110 patients with failed spinal anesthesia and 330 control patients from September 1, 2016, to April 30, 2020, in the largest university hospital, Thailand. Of 12,914 cesarean deliveries, 12,001 patients received single-shot spinal anesthesia (92.9%) during the study period. Total spinal anesthesia failure was experienced by 110/12,001 patients, giving an incidence of 0.9%. Factors related to the failures were a patient body mass index (BMI) ≤29.5 kg/m2 (adjusted odds ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2-3.1; P = .010) and a third-year resident (the most senior trainee) performing the spinal block (adjusted odds ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.7; P < .001). In the group with failed spinal anesthesia, neonatal Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were lower than those of the control group (both P < .001). Two patients in the failed spinal anesthesia group (2/110; 1.8%) had difficult airways and desaturation. Independent factors associated with total spinal anesthesia failure were a BMI of ≤29.5 kg/m2 and a third-year resident performing the spinal block. Although the incidence of total failure was infrequent, there were negative consequences for the mothers and neonates. Adjusting the dose of bupivacaine according to the weight and height of a patient is recommended, with a higher dose appropriate for patients with a lower BMI.

Evaluation Effect of Aspiration of 0.2 ml of Cerebrospinal Fluid After Completion of Injection 0.5% Bupivacaine and Reinjection Into Subarachnoid Space on Sensory and Motor Block in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Spinal anesthesia (SPA) is the most common type of anesthesia administered for cesarean section. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of aspiration of CSF (0.2 mL) immediately after SPA with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine on the extent of sensory and motor block.

Methods

In this clinical trial, 60 women at ≥37 weeks of gestation and aged between 18 and 46 years, candidate for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two equal groups (n = 30). Group A (CSF-aspiration group) received the spinal anesthesia with 10 mg of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with aspiration of 0.2 ml of CSF. Group B (no-CSF-aspiration group) received only 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Pin-prick analgesia and motor block were tested during the induction.

Results

The mean maximum level of analgesia was T6 in each group. Although the mean time to reach the maximum level of anesthesia (4.43 ± 5.14 vs. 2.76 ± 2.04, P = 0.107) and to reach T10 level (50.56 ± 11.51 vs. 49.10 ± 13.68, P = 0.665) in the CSF-aspiration group is longer than the non-CSF-aspiration group, but this differences were not significant. There were no significant between-group differences regarding sensory and motor block quality (P = 0.389) or failed SPA (four cases in CSF-aspiration group vs. two cases in no-CSF-aspiration group, P = 0.389). The incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, headache, vomiting and nausea were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the difference in hemodynamic parameters between the two groups over times was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Our finding indicated that the aspiration of 0.2 ml of CSF after injection of spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine does not seem to affect the extent of sensory and motor block, success rate, or outcome after SPA in cesarean section.

Clinical Trial Registration

[https://www.irct.ir/search/result?query=IRCT20120915010841N25], identifier [IRCT20120915010841N25].

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Pregnant Women With Moyamoya Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Moyamoya disease, a rare chronic cerebrovascular disease with a fragile vascular network at the base of the brain, can cause ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes or seizures. Precise blood pressure control and adequate analgesia are important for patients with moyamoya disease to prevent neurological events such as ischemia and hemorrhage. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative mean arterial pressure of pregnant women with moyamoya disease according to the mode of anesthesia (general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia) used during cesarean delivery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 87 cesarean deliveries in 74 patients who had been diagnosed with moyamoya disease before cesarean delivery. The primary outcome, intraoperative maximum mean arterial pressure during anesthesia, was compared according to the type of anesthesia administered (general versus spinal anesthesia). Other perioperative hemodynamic data (lowest mean arterial pressure, incidence of hypotension, vasopressor use, and antihypertensive agent use), maternal neurologic symptoms, neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores <7, ventilatory support, and intensive care unit admission), maternal and neonatal length of stay, postoperative pain scores, and rescue analgesic use were assessed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

While the lowest blood pressure during anesthesia and incidence of hypotension did not differ between the 2 groups, the maximum mean arterial pressure during anesthesia was lower in the spinal anesthesia group than that in the general anesthesia group (104.8 ± 2.5 vs 122.0 ± 4.6; P = .002). Study data did not support the claim that maternal neurologic symptoms differ according to the type of anesthesia used (5.6% vs 9.3%; P = .628); all patients recovered without any sequelae. The postoperative pain scores were lower, and fewer rescue analgesics were used in the spinal anesthesia group than in the general anesthesia group. Other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia mitigated the maximum arterial blood pressure during cesarean delivery and improved postoperative pain in patients with moyamoya disease.

Comparison of three neuraxial anesthesia approaches in parturient women with obesity and pregnancy-induced hypertension who underwent cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of different approaches of neuraxial anesthesia in parturient women with obesity and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) who undergo cesarean section (CS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 108 parturient women with obesity and PIH who underwent CS. All women were divided into the following three groups according to the neuraxial anesthesia approach: spinal anesthesia (SA), epidural anesthesia (EA), and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE). Clinical variables were compared.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 27.3 ± 2.2 years. Women in the CSE group had a longer duration from puncture to surgery, smaller intraoperative change in mean arterial pressure, higher Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, shorter surgery time, lower rates of nausea and vomiting, and lower rate of intraoperative hypotension compared with those in the SA and EA groups.

CONCLUSION

CSE takes longer to administer in parturient women with obesity and PIH who undergo CS compared with those who have SA or EA. However, CSE has several advantages over SA or EA, including a shorter surgery time, more stable intraoperative mean arterial pressure, lower rates of nausea, vomiting, and intraoperative hypotension, and better Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes.

The Density of Different Local Anesthetic Solutions, Opioid Adjuvants and Their Clinically Used Combinations: An Experimental Study

Various opioids are added to local anesthetic solutions for spinal anesthesia. This may change the final density of the local anestetic (LA) mixture. This effect regarding current concepts in spinal anesthesia needs to be re-evaluated. In order to re-evaluate such effects, hyperbaric and isobaric local anesthetic (LA) solutions were mixed with opioid adjuvants (A) using the equipment available in the operating room. Ten density measurements for each composition (LA-A) were performed. The density change of 0.0006 g/mL was regarded as significant. Measured densities were also compared with theoretical values calculated using Hare's. As a result, the addition of an opioid adjuvant caused a significant reduction in the final density of the LA-A solution. In hyperbaric LA mixtures, it did not change the baricity from hyperbaric to isobaric. However, the addition of highly hypobaric fentanyl 0.99360 g/mL (SD ± 0.00004) changes all isobaric LA solutions baricity to hypobaric. The comparison of measured and theoretical densities revealed significant differences (p > 0.05). However, the absolute reduction reached 0.0006 g/mL in only two LA-A compositions. We conclude that the addition of fentanyl to isobaric LA results in a hypobaric solution that may affect the distribution of the block. The inadequacy of LA-A in a clinical setting is unlikely to influence block characteristics.

Neonatal and early childhood outcomes following maternal anesthesia for cesarean section: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The fetus is vulnerable to maternal drug exposure. We determined associations of exposure to spinal, epidural, or general anesthesia on neonatal and childhood development outcomes during the first 1000 days of life.

METHODS

Population-based study of all singleton, cesarean livebirths of 24+0 to 43+6 weeks gestation between January 2007 and December 2016 in Scotland, stratified by urgency with follow-up to age 2 years. Models were adjusted for: maternal age, weight, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, smoking, drug-use, induction, parity, previous cesarean or abortion, pre-eclampsia, gestation, birth weight, and sex.

RESULTS

140 866 mothers underwent cesarean section (41.2% (57,971/140,866) elective, 58.8% (82,895/140,866) emergency) with general anesthesia used in 3.2% (1877/57,971) elective and 9.8% (8158/82,895) of emergency cases. In elective cases, general anesthesia versus spinal was associated with: neonatal resuscitation (crude event rate 16.2% vs 1.9% (adjusted RR 8.20, 95% CI 7.20 to 9.33), Apgar <7 at 5 min (4.6% vs 0.4% (adjRR 11.44, 95% CI 8.88 to 14.75)), and neonatal admission (8.6% vs 4.9% (adjRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.94)). Associations were similar in emergencies; resuscitation (32.2% vs 12.3% (adjRR 2.40, 95% CI 2.30 to 2.50)), Apgar <7 (12.6% vs 2.8% (adjRR 3.87, 95% CI 3.56 to 4.20), and admission (31.6% vs 19.9% (adjRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.25). There was a weak association between general anesthesia in emergency cases and having ≥1 concern noted in developmental assessment at 2 years (21.0% vs 16.5% (adjRR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16)).

CONCLUSIONS

General anesthesia for cesarean section, irrespective of urgency, is associated with neonatal resuscitation, low Apgar, and neonatal unit admission. Associations were strongest in non-urgent cases and at term. Further evaluation of long-term outcomes is warranted.

A systematic review with network meta-analysis on mono strategy of anaesthesia for preeclampsia in caesarean section

The aim of this study was to reveal the effects of anaesthesia strategies on maternal mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, vasopressor consumption, adverse events, and neonatal resuscitation when women with preeclampsia (PE) undergo caesarean section (CS). Three major databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective controlled studies (PCSs). Two authors independently screened, extracted, and checked eligibility and outcome data. Outcomes involved MAP, vasopressor use, maternal adverse events, APGAR scores, and neonatal resuscitation. Pooled estimates were carried out by contrast-based network meta-analysis, and pooled effect sizes were presented with 95% confidence interval (CI). Eleven RCTs and one PCS (n = 782) formed three-node network meta-analysis, and non-significant differences were observed in MAP, 5-min APGAR score, and neonatal intubation rate among the three anaesthesia strategies. General anaesthesia had significantly lower vasopressor consumption than spinal anaesthesia did (standardised mean difference =  - 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 1.76 to - 0.63), but it had higher maternal adverse event rate (risk ratio = 2.00, 95% CI 1.16-3.47). Because no optimal anaesthesia strategy has been shown to achieve a balanced maternal and neonatal outcome, therefore a shared decision-making process may be required regarding the most suitable choice of anaesthetic strategy for individual preeclamptic mother undergoing CS. Future larger studies may need to focus on evaluating the role of vasopressors on maternal hemodynamic as well as factors affecting maternal outcomes for different anaesthetic techniques in preeclamptic women undergoing CS.

The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery has declined in the last decades due to the widespread utilization of neuraxial techniques and the understanding that neuraxial anesthesia can be provided even in urgent circumstances. In fact, the role of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery has been revisited, because despite recent devices facilitating endotracheal intubation and clinical algorithms, guiding anesthesiologists facing challenging scenarios, risks, and complications of general anesthesia at the time of delivery for both mother and neonate(s) remain significant. In this review, we will discuss clinical scenarios and risk factors associated with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery and address reasons why anesthesiologists should apply strategies to minimize its use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unnecessary general anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with maternal complications, including serious anesthesia-related complications, surgical site infection, and venous thromboembolic events. Racial and socioeconomic disparities and low-resource settings are major contributing factors in the use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery, with both maternal and perinatal mortality increasing when general anesthesia is provided. In addition, more significant maternal pain and higher rates of postpartum depression requiring hospitalization are associated with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

SUMMARY

Rates of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery have overall decreased, and while general anesthesia no longer is a contributing factor to anesthesia-related maternal deaths, further opportunities to reduce its use should be emphasized. Raising awareness in identifying situations and patients at risk to help avoid unnecessary general anesthesia remains crucial.

Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study

Background

Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery.

Objective

To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-maternal outcomes.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories).

Results

Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, operative time and neonatal intensive care unit admission were not statistically different between anesthetic modes. In the emergency category, significantly higher percentage of patients were satisfied with and would recommend epidural anesthesia.

Conclusion

There was no statistically significant difference among the three types of anesthesia regarding neonatal intensive care admission and length of hospital stay for emergency and elective categories. APGAR score was higher with spinal than with general anesthesia in the emergency category with no significant difference in the elective category. More diclofenac sodium and paracetamol and less opioids were used after regional than after general anesthesia. Satisfaction was higher with epidural anesthesia.

Limitations

Retrospective and single centered.

Dexamethasone and post-dural puncture headache in women who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Post-dural puncture headache is a common complication after spinal anesthesia for women who undergo cesarean delivery. Intravenous (IV) dexamethasone has been used to reduce the incidence and severity of PDPH with controversial results. This Systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of IV dexamethasone on PDPH.

METHODS

This study is reported as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of PDPH. The secondary outcome variables were the postoperative total analgesic requirement and incidence of nausea and/or vomiting. Twelve randomized controlled trials with a total of 1548 women were included.

RESULTS

Intravenous (IV) dexamethasone had no effect on the incidence of PDPH (OR = 0.64; CI, 0.39 to 1.05; I2 = 71%, P = 0.08). Intravenous dexamethasone did not show a significant difference in the incidence of PDPH at 24 h at 48 h, and within one week postoperatively with p-values of less than 0.05. In a random-effect model, a pooled analysis showed that IV dexamethasone had no effect on the severity of PDPH in VAS (MD = 0.78; CI, -2.27 to 0.71; I2 = 98%, P = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous dexamethasone failed to decrease the incidence and severity of PDPH in women who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Moderate rate of implementation of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: does it improve neonatal well-being? A case-control study

Before 2013, almost none of the cesarean section (CS) deliveries at our institution were performed with spinal anesthesia (SA), but after 2013 SA became the first-choice anesthesia for CS because it achieved better neonatal outcomes. However, the current rate of SA implementation at our institution was estimated to be approx. 60-70%, which is intermediate between these at other institutions in Japan or in other countries. This raises a question: What rate of SA use among CS cases achieves the best neonatal outcomes? To answer this question, we conducted this single-center case-control study with 1326 CS cases between 1994 and 2017 and compared the neonatal outcomes before to those after 2013. The logistic regression models were prepared to estimate the risk of birth asphyxia defined as a 5-min Apgar of < 7, associated with eight potential confounders, including the modified anesthetic protocol. The modified protocol was not a significant independent factor for neonatal asphyxia, indicating that our moderate SA priority protocol did not improve the neonatal outcomes even when compared to the outcomes at a 0% SA rate. A > 70% rate of SA implementation may be needed to provide better neonatal outcomes.

The efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia by intrathecal dexmedetomidine (DEX) for parturients undergoing cesarean section are still lack of evidence. This aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal DEX for parturients undergoing cesarean section to provide more data evidence for intrathecal applications.

METHODS

Three hundred parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned into three groups: group B: 9.0 mg (1.2 ml) of 0.75% bupivacaine with saline (1 ml); group FB: 9.0 mg (1.2 ml) of 0.75% bupivacaine with 20 μg of fentanyl (1 ml); group DB: 9.0 mg (1.2 ml) of 0.75% bupivacaine with 5 μg of DEX (1 ml). Intraoperative block characteristics, parturients' postoperative quality of recovery, maternal and neonatal outcomes and the plasma concentration of DEX were measured. All parturients were followed up for 30 days to determine whether nerve injury occurred.

RESULTS

Compared with group B, the duration of sensory block in group FB and group DB were significantly prolonged (108.4 min [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 104.6-112.3] in group B, and 122.0 min [95% CI = 116.8-127.3] in group FB, 148.2 min [95% CI = 145.3-151.1] in group DB). The overall score of quality recovery in group DB (71.6 [95% CI = 71.0-72.2]) was significantly higher than that in group FB (61.5 [95% CI = 60.8-62.2]) and group B (61.7 [95% CI = 61.0-62.4]). There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups for PH, PaO₂, and PaCO₂ of newborn. The plasma concentration of DEX in umbilical artery and umbilical vein was low and cannot be detected. The 30-days follow-up of parturients did not show any new onset of back, buttock or leg pain or paresthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

DEX is a potential local anesthetic adjuvant that the intrathecal combination of 5 μg DEX can safely exhibit a facilitatory block effect and improve parturients' recovery quality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number # ChiCTR1900022019 ; Date of Registration on March 20th, 2019).

Comparative effectiveness of interventions for managing postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although many drugs or interventions have been studied to manage catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD), their comparative effectiveness is unknown. We attempted to assess the comparative effectiveness of the strategies to manage CRBD in patients undergoing urologic surgery including amikacin, solifenacin, darifenacin, butylscopolamine, dexmedetomidine, gabapentin, glycopyrrolate, ketamine, oxybutynin, resiniferatoxin, tolterodine, tramadol, caudal block, dorsal penile nerve block, lidocaine-prilocaine cream.

METHODS

We performed an arm-based network meta-analysis including 29 trials with 2841 participants. Goodness of model fit was evaluated by deviance information criteria (DIC). The incidence of CRBD at 0, 1, and 6 h after surgery and the incidence of moderate to severe CRBD at 0, 1, and 6 h after surgery were compared.

RESULTS

Random effect model was selected according to DIC. Most of the drugs significantly decreased the incidence of CRBD except amikacin, tramadol at 0 and 1 h after surgery. Dexmedetomidine, solifenacin, caudal block, dorsal penile nerve block, resiniferatoxin, and gabapentin 1200 mg p.o. significantly decreased the incidence of CRBD at 6 h after surgery (gabapentin 1200: Odds ratio [OR] 0.02; SUCRA 95.6). Dexmedetomidine and tolterodine significantly decreased the incidence of moderate to severe CRBD at 0, 1, and 6 h after surgery (tolterodine at 6 h: OR 0.05; SUCRA 73.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Gabapentin was ranked best regarding the overall incidence of CRBD, while tolterodine was ranked best in reducing the severity of CRBD. However, a firm conclusion cannot be made from our analysis due to small-study number and heterogeneity regarding study setting and outcome measurement.