The use of buccal fat pad (BFP) as a pedicled graft in cleft palate surgery

A Review of the Use of Buccal Fat Pad in Cleft Palate Repair

OBJECTIVE

To review the available evidence on the use of the Buccal Fat Pad in primary and secondary Cleft Palate repair.

METHODS

This is a narrative review. A computerized literature search was conducted for articles published till February 2022 using the Mesh phrases buccal fat pad AND cleft palate, Bichat's Fat pad AND cleft palate, buccal fat pad OR Bichats Fat pad AND cleft palate.

RESULTS

A total of 35 articles were included in this review based on the set eligibility criteria. Most of the studies were retrospective case reviews (n  =  16, 45.7%), and the aggregate number of patients from all included studies was 666. Reported uses of the buccal fat pad (BFP) in association with cleft palate repair include the closure of central cleft palate defect and nasal floor in primary cleft palate repair, oronasal fistula repair following primary repair of cleft palate, and closure of relieving incision defect in primary repair of cleft palate. Complications reported were 24 cases of Oronasal Fistula (ONF), 2 dehiscences, and 4 transient mucosal defects.

CONCLUSION

The high success rate, vascularity, ease of tissue harvest, and low donor site morbidity all support its use as an adjunct flap in cleft palate repair, especially in the closure of wide palatal clefts, to prevent post-palatal repair fistula, wound contracture, and subsequently velopharyngeal insufficiency and possibly midface hypoplasia.

Buccal Fat Pad in Primary and Secondary Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence supporting the use of buccal fat pad (BFP) in primary and secondary cleft palate repair and its short- and long- term clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review conducted by 2 independent reviewers following PRISMA guidelines.

SETTING: NONE PARTICIPANTS

Articles were identified from three databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase and Web of Science). Search terms included "cleft palate", "palatoplasty", "palate repair", "buccal fat pad".

INTERVENTIONS

Use of BFP in primary and secondary cleft palatoplasty.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were immediate postoperative complications, postoperative fistula, and maxillary growth. Secondary outcomes were palatal length, speech, and donor site morbidity.

RESULTS

Ninety-one reports were retrieved after excluding duplicates. Twenty-three studies were included (13 case series and 10 comparative studies). Overall level of evidence was low. Randomized and non-randomized studies had a high risk of bias. In primary palatoplasty, BFP was more frequently used filling lateral relaxing incisions(57.4%), or in the hard-soft palate junction and covering mucosal defects(30.1%). In these patients, post operative fistula incidence was 2.8%. Two studies found wider transverse maxillary dimensions after BFP use. No higher incidence of bleeding, infection, dehiscence, or flap necrosis was reported. In secondary palatoplasty, no recurrent fistulas were reported for patients undergoing BFP for fistula repair.

CONCLUSIONS

BFP appears to be associated with a favorable impact in fistula prevention and management, as well as in transverse maxillary growth. However, there is a high heterogeneity among studies, high risk of bias and overall low quality of evidence. More high-quality research with long-term follow-up is warranted.

Fat grafting in patients with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review

This systematic review aims to compare different fat-grafting techniques for cleft lip and palate repair. A search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, gray literature and reference lists of selected articles. A total of 25 articles were included, 12 on closure of palatal fistula and 13 on cleft lip repair. The rate of complete resolution of palatal fistula ranged from 88.6% to 100% in studies with no control group, whereas in comparative studies patients receiving a fat graft showed better outcomes than those not receiving a graft. Evidence suggests that fat grafting can be indicated for the primary and secondary repair of cleft palate, with good results. The use of dermis-fat grafts in lip repair was associated with gains in surface area (11.5%), vertical height (18.5%-27.11%), and lip projection (20%). Fat infiltration was associated with increased lip volume (6.5%), vermilion show (31.68% ± 24.03%), and lip projection (46.71% ± 31.3%). The available literature suggests that fat grafting is a promising autogenous option for palate and fistula repair and for improvement of lip projection and scar aesthetics in patients with cleft. However, to develop a guideline, further studies are needed to confirm whether one technique is superior to the other.

Submalar fat pad removal for esthetic purposes: A systematic approach

OBJECTIVE

Submalar fat pad removal for esthetic purposes has been performed as a routine in the last decades. However, several factors have not been properly analyzed and studied. In order to address this problem, the purpose of this study is to describe clinical parameters to be taken into account when analyzing potential patients as well as a systematic approach during the pre, intra and postoperative stages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients complaining of cheek fullness were evaluated to determine if they were good candidates for the procedure. Eligible patients underwent the same patient selection criteria and pre, intra and post-surgical protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were selected. 40 females and 4 males, with a mean age of 25.4 years. The bilaterally excised buccal fat pads had an average weight of 4.3 gs. There was only 1 complication (unilateral emphysema), during the immediate postoperative phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Submalar fat pad removal is an effective technique for refining the facial silhouette that should be reserved only for patients with increased buccal fat pad volume or its pseudoherniation. Performing the surgery following the protocol established in our study can allow the surgeon to achieve more reliable intra and postoperative outcomes.

Effectiveness of bandage in the incidence of major complications on bichectomy: literature review and case series of 643 bichectomies

Buccal fat pad removal or bichectomy is an esthetic surgical procedure that is gaining notoriety and increasing number worldwide. This paper aims to discuss the effectiveness of bandage in bichectomy postoperative concerning major complications like bleeding and subcutaneous emphysema. This is a retrospective case series according to PROCESS guidelines of 643 bichectomy surgeries performed by two different surgeons with the same technique from January 2018 until December 2020. Effectiveness of bandage is evaluated in complications rate decrease with statistical tests (p < 0.05). A literature review was performed to sediment knowledge about this theme. Female patients search for buccal fat pad removal more for esthetic reasons and male patients for functional purposes. Bichectomy has a low incidence of major complications, and this incidence decreases more with a bandage use (95%CI). Bandages are effective in the decrease of major complications related to bichectomy.

Buccal Fat Pad: Adjunctive Procedure for Lateral Defect Coverage following Primary Palatoplasty

BACKGROUND

The buccal fat flap is an encapsulated mass originating from a specific fat tissue that is easily accessed and richly vascularized. The aim of this study was to report the effect of using the buccal fat flap on the oronasal fistula rate in primary palatoplasty.

METHODS

A case-controlled study of 94 patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) two-flap palatoplasty with buccal fat flap for coverage of lateral hard palate defect and (2) conventional two-flap palatoplasty. The incidence of oronasal fistula and postoperative complications were compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of oronasal fistula development.

RESULT

Forty-seven patients in each group demonstrated the same baseline characteristics. The buccal fat group showed a significant lower postoperative oronasal fistula rate (2.13 percent versus 21.28 percent, p = 0.008) and smaller fistula size (2 mm versus 4 mm, p = 0.049). A cleft width wider than 11.5 mm increased the odds ratio of fistula formation by 8.44-fold (p = 0.047), and the use of buccal fat protected against postoperative palatal fistula formation (OR, 0.08, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The use of buccal fat flaps for lateral hard palatal defect coverage in primary palatoplasty can reduce the rate of postoperative palatal fistula, especially in cases of wide palatal cleft.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

What is the Fate of the Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Flap When Used During Primary Palatoplasty?

ABSTRACT

Pedicled buccal fat pad flaps have more recently been applied to primary cleft palate reconstruction, and yet the integrity of the flap and the long-term impact on the palate has not yet been studied. This case study uses magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the composition of the soft palate 5 years after the interpositional placement of bilateral pedicled buccal fat pad flaps during primary palatoplasty. Anatomical measures are used to quantify the flap and surrounding velopharynx using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional computer technology, indicating that this surgical technique may have a lasting impact for children with cleft palate.

Split Buccal Fat Flap in Modified Furlow Palatoplasty: Surgical Technique and Early Result

SUMMARY

Encouraging results have been described for the use of pedicled buccal fat pad flap in primary cleft palate repair. This retrospective study describes the surgical technique and early results of a technical innovation utilizing the split buccal fat flaps in modified Furlow palatoplasty with small double-opposing Z-plasty. This technique introduces buccal fat tissue for coverage of lateral denuded palate surfaces to reduce the bone exposure and scar formation to potentially attenuate maxillary growth interference and for reinforcement of the palatal areas of high tension or with incomplete closure to decrease the risk of postoperative dehiscence and oronasal fistula formation. Consecutive nonsyndromic patients (n = 56) with cleft palate were treated with this method, all of whom demonstrated fast mucosalization of lateral palatal recipient regions within 3 weeks postoperatively and showed no fistula with 12 months' follow-up. Of 19 patients (33.9 percent) who underwent auditory-perceptual assessment, 15 (78.9 percent) had normal resonance. Surgeons could add this alternative surgical maneuver to their armamentarium during the primary palatoplasty, in which coverage of lateral surfaces and reinforcement with fat tissue in the anterior soft palate space are of paramount relevance.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

The Application of Buccal Fat Pad to Cover Lateral Palatal Defect Causes Early Mucolization

Introduction

Cleft lip and cleft palate are among the most common birth defects. These deformities lead to profound psychosocial and functional effects on cleft palate patients. Several surgical techniques have been described for the repair of the cleft. The defects lateral to mucoperiosteal flaps closure are sometimes covered with sterile gauze soaked with soft paraffin or tincture of benzoin or are left open for mucolization by means of secondary intention. The buccal fat pad (BFP) is used as a pedicled graft to cover the exposed bone of the lateral palatal defect, and it is associated with proposed benefits of early healing and fewer effects on transverse growth of the maxilla.

Materials and methods

This was a prospective study involving 42 cleft palate patients who underwent cleft palate repair; 21 patients received BFP as an additional step to cover lateral palatal defect while the rest of the patients (n=21) underwent conventional surgical cleft palate repair and the defect was covered with Surgicel (Ethicon, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ). Postoperative follow-up was conducted at first, second, and third weeks postoperatively to assess the time required for mucolization.

Results

Our cohort of 42 patients included an equal number of complete and incomplete cleft palate patients. Follow-up at the first postoperative week showed an equal number (n=21, 100%) patients with incomplete mucolization on both groups, while at the second postoperative follow-up, only one (4.8%) of the patients who underwent conventional cleft palate repair had complete mucolization while 20 (95.2%) among the patients who underwent BFP had complete mucolization. At the third-week postoperative follow-up, three (14.3%) patients from the conventional group had complete mucolization, while 18 (85.7%) had incomplete mucolization. Only two patients (4.8%) developed recipient area complications, and they were managed conservatively.

Conclusion

BFP is a good source of vascularized tissue to cover the hard palate bones after primary cleft repair. It is easy to harvest as a local tissue with a low learning curve. The epithelialization rate is faster than conventional methods with minimal complication rates.

A Preliminary Study of Anatomical Changes Following the Use of a Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Flap During Primary Palatoplasty

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the surgical impact of the pedicled buccal fat pad (BFP) flap on the levator veli palatini (LVP) muscle and surrounding velopharyngeal (VP) anatomy following primary palatoplasty using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

DESIGN

Observational, prospective.

SETTING

MRI studies were completed at 3 different facilities. All participants with BFP flap were operated on by the same surgeon.

PARTICIPANTS

Five pediatric participants with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L) who underwent primary palatoplasty with BFP flap placement. Comparison groups consisted of 10 participants: 5 with CP±L who did not receive the BFP flap and 5 healthy controls.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants underwent nonsedated MRI 2 to 5 years postoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Anatomical measures of the velopharynx and LVP among the 3 participant groups.

RESULTS

Median values were significantly different among groups for velar length (P = .042), effective velar length (P = .048), effective VP ratio (P = .046), LVP length (P = .021), extravelar LVP length (P = .009), and LVP origin-origin distance (P = .030). Post hoc analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the BFP and traditional repair groups for effective VP ratio (P = .040), extravelar LVP length (P = .033), and LVP length (P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary support that the BFP flap creates a longer velum, with increased distance between the posterior hard palate and the LVP, and a larger effective VP ratio compared to traditional surgical techniques. Future research is needed to determine whether this procedure provides a more favorable mechanism for VP closure.

A Cadaveric Study of the Buccal Fat Pad: Implications for Closure of Palatal Fistulae and Donor-Site Morbidity

BACKGROUND

For the cleft surgeon, palatal fistulae after cleft palate repair remain a difficult problem, with a paucity of local tissue options to aid closure. Small clinical series have described the use of the buccal fat pad flap to repair palatal fistulae; however, there is no literature detailing the anatomical coverage of the flap. This study delineates the anatomy of the buccal fat pad flap to guide surgeons in patient selection and examines the residual buccal fat after flap harvest to provide new information with regard to possible effects on the donor site.

METHODS

Buccal fat pad flaps were raised in 30 hemicadavers. The reach of the flap across the midline, anteriorly and posteriorly, was recorded. In 18 hemicadavers, the entire buccal fat pad was then exposed to determine the effects of flap harvest on movement and volume of the residual fat.

RESULTS

All buccal fat pad flaps provided coverage from the soft palate to the posterior third of the hard palate and all across the midline. Approximately three-fourths of flaps would cover the mid hard palate. The flap constitutes 36 percent of the total buccal fat pad on average, and a series of retaining ligaments were identified that may prevent overresection.

CONCLUSIONS

The buccal fat pad flap is a useful tool for coverage of fistulae in the soft palate to the posterior third of the hard palate. In most cases, it will also reach the middle third; however, it is not suitable for more anterior defects. On average, two-thirds of the buccal fat pad remains within the cheek after flap harvest, which may protect against unwanted alteration in aesthetics.

A Toolbox of Surgical Techniques for Palatal Fistula Repair

OBJECTIVE

To provide an inventory of oronasal fistula repair techniques alongside expert commentary on which techniques are appropriate for each fistula type.

DESIGN

A 4-stage approach was used to develop a consensus on surgical techniques available for fistula repair: (1) in-person discussion of oronasal fistula cases among cleft surgeons, (2) development of a schema for fistula management using transcripts of the in-person case discussion, (3) evaluation of the preliminary schema via a web-based survey of additional cleft surgeons, and (4) revision of the management schema using survey responses.

PARTICIPANTS

Six cleft surgeons participated in the in-person case discussion. Eleven additional surgeons participated in the web-based survey. Participants had diverse training experiences, having completed residency and fellowship at 20 different hospitals.

RESULTS

A schema for fistula management was developed, organized by fistula location. The schema catalogues all viable approaches for each location. For fistulae involving the soft palate, the schema stresses the importance of evaluating for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and incorporating VPI management into fistula repair. For fistulae involving the hard palate, the schema separately enumerates the techniques available for nasal lining repair and for oral lining repair in each region. The schema also catalogues the diversity of approaches to lingual- and labioalveolar fistula, including variation in timing, orthodontic preparation, and simultaneous alveolar bone grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

This study employed consensus methods to create a comprehensive inventory of available fistula repair techniques and to identify preferential techniques among a diverse group of surgeons.

The Surgical Anatomy and the Deep Plane Thread Lift of the Buccal Fat Pad

Background

Management of facial rejuvenation by the thread lift procedure has evolved over the past few years. The role of deep plane thread lift for buccal fat pad reposition was advocated. However, there are concerns about the risks and the feasibility of the deep plane thread lift. This study was designed to determine whether the deep plane thread lift could achieve effective aesthetic results and to investigate the possible risks of critical tissue injury through cadaveric studies.

Methods

Twelve fresh frozen cephalic specimens of 8 male and 4 female Asian body donors (mean age, 63.3 ± 8.0 years) were investigated. The deep plane thread lifts for reposition of the buccal fat pads were performed for all the left hemifaces. Cadaveric dissections were performed to investigate the moving distance of the buccal fat pad and to examine the surrounding tissue of the passage of the deep plane thread lift.

Results

The average moving distance of the buccal fat pads after the deep plane thread lift was 3.73 cm. The difference in moving distance of buccal fat pads between bilateral sides was statistically significant (P < 0.001). No injuries of the critical vessels or nerves were found after cadaveric dissection. The passage of the deep plane thread lift was evaluated.

Conclusion

The deep plane thread lift for reposition of the buccal fat pad is a safe, effective, and practical method.

The Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Combination With Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad in Wide Cleft Palate Repair: A Case Report and Literature Review

We describe a case of the combined use of acellular dermal matrix and pedicled buccal fat pad (BFP) in a wide U-shaped cleft palate repair. Acellular dermal matrix was used as a "patch" repair for the nasal mucosa defect as opposed to the conventional inlay graft. The advantages include reduced cost and a smaller avascular graft load. Lateral relaxing incisions were made to ensure tension-free closure of oromucosa at midline. Lateral oromucosa defect closure with well-vascularized pedicled BFP ensures enhanced healing, less palatal contracture and shortening, and reduced infection. The palate healed with mucosalization at 2 weeks, and no complications were noted at 6 months follow-up.

Utilization of pedicled buccal fat pads for coverage of the lateral relaxing wound: A review of literature and a case series of 15 patients

Background

The buccal fat pad (BFP) is an encapsulated mass originated from a specific fat tissue in various volume throughout the life of each person and BFP has been used in various surgeries as a source of useful graft material due to its easy accessibility and rich vascularization.

Case Report

This report describes fifteen patients who were treated with buccal fat pads (BFP) as a pedicled graft for lateral relaxing wound closure in primary cleft palate surgery. A review of relevant literature is also presented.

Results

All patients had a mean follow-up of 3.7 weeks with a minimum follow-up time of three weeks and a maximum follow-up of four weeks. All patients who had an uneventful immediate postoperative period showed signs of BFP epithelialization characterized by a yellowish tissue beginning in the first week and ending within 3-4 weeks after surgery.

Conclusions

The use of BFP for the small to medium-sized defects reconstruction in palatoplasty is a safe and reliable method with fast healing. Even older patients who would not be able to tolerate time-consuming flap reconstruction procedures had good results. Key words:Cleft palate, buccal fat pads, lateral relaxing wound.

Buccal Fat Pad: A Useful Adjunct Flap in Cleft Palate Repair

Aim

The aim of the study is to describe the technique and also the outcome of using buccal fat pad (BFP) as an adjunct flap in cleft palate repair and to report the surgical outcome.

Materials and Methods

All the surgical repairs with BFP were done under general anaesthesia. The use of BFP was indicated in patients who needed a secondary palatal cleft repair, those with wide palatal clefts or patients whose primary palatal cleft repair was complicated intraoperatively by inadvertent tearing of the nasal mucosa. The raw wound surfaces were dressed with Vaseline gauze instilled with Framycetin. All subjects 4 years of age and below had oral toileting with warm saline-soaked gauze after each meal. The other patients had oral toileting with warm saline mouth bath in addition to conventional toothbrushing.

Results

Eight patients were included in this study with an age range of 1-26 years (mean ± SD = 6.1 ± 8.6 years). Three patients presented with wide palatal clefts, another three presented with dehiscence after a primary repair which necessitated a secondary repair, while the remaining two patients had inadvertent iatrogenic tear of the nasal mucosa during the primary surgical repair. For the latter set of patients, repair was completed by the use of BFP as an adjunct at the same surgery. Post-operative evaluation was satisfactory in all cases, with healing of the flaps and complete epithelialization of the BFP in 1 month. All the patients experienced post-operative cheek swelling, signifying the post-operative oedema due to BFP harvest. However, this was usually resolved within 48 h. Healing was satisfactory with full epithelialization, and no complications were observed.

Conclusions

Successful application of BFP as an adjunct flap in palatal cleft closure is demonstrated in these series. It is recommended that cleft surgeons add this technique to their armamentarium in difficult cases, especially in wide palatal cleft repair, secondary palatal cleft repair and in cases of inadvertent tearing of nasal mucosa during primary cleft palate repair.

Reliability of Oronasal Fistula Classification

OBJECTIVE

Oronasal fistula is an important complication of cleft palate repair that is frequently used to evaluate surgical quality, yet reliability of fistula classification has never been examined. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of oronasal fistula classification both within individual surgeons and between multiple surgeons.

DESIGN

Using intraoral photographs of children with repaired cleft palate, surgeons rated the location of palatal fistulae using the Pittsburgh Fistula Classification System. Intrarater and interrater reliability scores were calculated for each region of the palate.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight cleft surgeons rated photographs obtained from 29 children.

RESULTS

Within individual surgeons reliability for each region of the Pittsburgh classification ranged from moderate to almost perfect (κ = .60-.96). By contrast, reliability between surgeons was lower, ranging from fair to substantial (κ = .23-.70). Between-surgeon reliability was lowest for the junction of the soft and hard palates (κ = .23). Within-surgeon and between-surgeon reliability were almost perfect for the more general classification of fistula in the secondary palate (κ = .95 and κ = .83, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first reliability study of fistula classification. We show that the Pittsburgh Fistula Classification System is reliable when used by an individual surgeon, but less reliable when used among multiple surgeons. Comparisons of fistula occurrence among surgeons may be subject to less bias if they use the more general classification of "presence or absence of fistula of the secondary palate" rather than the Pittsburgh Fistula Classification System.

Comparison of Clinical Outcome of Facial Artery Myomucosal Flap and Tongue Flap for Closure of Large Anterior Palatal Fistulas

Closure of large anterior palatal fistula has high recurrence rate. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of facial artery myomucosal flap (FAMM flap) and tongue flap used for closure of large anterior palatal fistula. This study was conducted from March 2008 to March 2014. Thirty-nine patients, aged 2 to 40 years, who had anterior palatal fistula 5 to 20 mm in width with associated alveolar cleft and repaired with either a tongue flap or FAMM flap were included. Patients were excluded if they had adequate local palatal tissue for closure, mid, posterior or multiple fistulae, fistula width >20 mm. Closure was performed in 2 layers. Turndown flap of oral mucoperiosteum was used to reconstruct nasal layer and oral layer was reconstructed with FAMM flap in 16 and tongue flap in 23 patients. Mean(SD) pain score was 3(1) and 7(1) in FAMM flap and tongue flap groups respectively with a P value <0.096. All patients in tongue flap group experienced difficulty in speaking and eating whereas in FAMM flap group 2 had eating problem and 2 experienced speech difficulty. Mean(SD) total operative times for FAMM flap and tongue flap were 155(38) and 242(10) minutes, respectively, P value <0.002. There was no difference for other complications and no recurrence at 1 year follow-up in both groups. The authors concluded that FAMM flap should be considered first choice for closure of large anterior palatal fistulas associated with alveolar cleft as it requires less total operative time and has less early postoperative complications.

The use of the buccal fat pad flap for oral reconstruction

Many congenital and acquired defects occur in the maxillofacial area. The buccal fat pad flap (BFP) is a simple and reliable flap for the treatment of many of these defects because of its rich blood supply and location, which is close to the location of various intraoral defects. In this article, we have reviewed BFP and the associated anatomical background, surgical techniques, and clinical applications. The surgical procedure is simple and has shown a high success rate in various clinical applications (approximately 90%), including the closure of oroantral fistula, correction of congenital defect, treatment of jaw bone necrosis, and reconstruction of tumor defects. The control of etiologic factors, size of defect, anatomical location of defect, and general condition of patient could influence the prognosis after grafting. In conclusion, BFP is a reliable flap that can be applied to various clinical situations.

The Feasibility of Buccal Fat Pad Flap in Oral Reconstruction Based on Clinical Experience in a Governmental Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pedicled buccal fat pad flap for its applicability in the reconstruction of surgically created oral defects. We highlighted the technique of flap harvesting, its different applications, and limitations.

DESIGN

Prospective analysis of patients with intraoral defects repaired by the buccal fat pad flap.

SETTING

Institutional center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-nine patients with surgical defects of the palate, maxilla, upper gingiva, buccal mucosa, lower gingiva, retromolar region, oral floor, and temporomandibular joint.

INTERVENTIONS

Pedicled buccal fat pad flap for treatment of small to medium-sized intraoral defects.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients had repair using a pedicled buccal fat pad flap between 2012 and 2014. Patients' photographs and clinical records were collected. The technique of flap harvesting, its advantages, and its drawbacks are described in this study.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up over a mean period of 13.7 months to check flap viability, competent repair, and donor site function and aesthetics. Complete epithelialization was observed within 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively according to the extent of the defect. All patients showed uneventful healing without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Buccal fat pad flap proved to be feasible for the reconstruction of surgically induced proximal small to medium-sized defects and can be extended to the palate, mandible, mouth angle, and temporomandibular joint region. Further research using preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of the size of the buccal fat pad is needed when reconstructing large distal defects.

Use of the buccal fat pad as free graft for closure of oronasal fistula in a cleft palate patient

Oronasal fistulas are frequent complications after cleft lip and palate surgery, with difficult treatment because of the presence of fibrotic and scarred tissue as well as the absence of local virgin tissue, representing a challenge in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The size of the fistula, its location, and the cause of the defect are important factors to determine the type of treatment and surgical technique. The use of pedicled buccal fat pad (BFP) for the repair of cleft palate has shown promising results, becoming a safe and effective method. On the other hand, the use of BFP as a free graft for oral defects has been rarely described in the literature. The current study is the first case report that shows the use of free graft of BFP in oronasal fistula after cleft lip and palate surgery and aimed to discuss the promising results of this surgical technique, suggesting it as a treatment option for anterior maxillary defects, when properly indicated.

The Deepithelialized Dorsal Tongue Flap for Reconstruction of Anterior Palatal Fistulae: Literature Review and Presentation of Our Experience in Egypt

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to present our experience with the closure of challenging palatal fistulae using the deepithelialized dorsal anterior tongue flap. We highlight the efficacy of suturing the tip of the tongue flap to the nasal septum for prevention of flap detachment.

DESIGN

Prospective analysis of cleft patients with anterior palatal fistulae repaired by deepithelialized dorsal anterior tongue flap.

SETTING

Institutional center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 30 patients with anterior palatal fistulae in the setting of previous cleft palate or fistula repair.

INTERVENTIONS

Deepithelialized dorsal anterior tongue flap for treatment of anterior palatal fistulae.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients had repair using deepithelialized dorsal anterior tongue flap between 2011 and 2014. Patients' photographs and clinical records were collected. The technique of flap harvesting and method of securing it in its position are described in this study.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up over a mean period of 13.8 months to check flap viability, competent repair, and donor site function and aesthetics. All patients showed uneventful healing without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique offered a secure method of palatal fistulae reconstruction. Further research is needed to show this technique's advantages and drawbacks.

Surgical Treatment of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws with the Use of Buccal Fat Pad: Case Report

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BROJ) has been described since 2003 as an adverse effect of bisphosphonate medications. These drugs act on the vasculature and bone remodeling, mainly on osteoclastic activity and can cause areas of necrotic bone exposure. Treatment for the BROJ is not yet defined, but surgical treatment is one of the forms proposed, which may cause oral deformities like sinus communication in some cases. In situations like this the buccal fat pad is an important alternative for coating nasal-oral communications, due its large blood supply, elasticity, absence of restriction by age and safety. This paper presents the case of a 58-year-old woman with BROJ in the left maxilla caused by the use of zoledronic acid for metastatic breast cancer. The extensive necrotic bone area was surgically removed resulting in oral sinus communication. A buccal fat pad was used to cover the defect. More studies should be performed regarding the treatment of BROJ but, if necessary, a buccal fat pad flap could be an alternative to solve nasal-oral communications related to BROJ.

Use of the buccinator musculomucosal flap for bone coverage in primary cleft palate repair

BACKGROUND

Cleft palate is one of the most common congenital malformations in the maxillofacial region. After a cleft palate repair, surgeons must deal with the transverse growth restriction and palatal fistulas caused by scar tissue on the raw bone surface around the hard palate. This report describes the technique of the buccinator musculomucosal flap procedure performed together with repair of the cleft palate. The objective is to cover exposed bone areas of the hard palate to decrease scar contraction and subsequent transverse maxillary growth restriction, as well as tension at the closure.

METHODS

From August 2009 to February 2012, 15 patients underwent the buccinator musculomucosal flap procedure. First, the cleft palate was repaired by mucoperiosteal flaps, resulting in wide and raw bone surfaces around the hard palate. The outline of the flap was marked on the buccal mucosa. Grounding on the exposed bone areas around the hard palate, the authors designed widths of flaps ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 cm. These flaps were elevated from the buccopharyngeal fascia and turned 90° to cover the raw hard palate bone surfaces. The donor sites were closed by direct suture.

RESULTS

The follow-up period was 1-26 months (average, 10 months). No complications were found in any patient who underwent the procedure, and no fistulas occurred in the midline of the palate. No patients experienced complications related to the donor sites. No trismus or other dysfunction related to mouth movement was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The buccinator musculomucosal flap is a convenient and safe flap procedure with fewer donor-site complications. This procedure also has significant potential for improving maxilla growth and reducing the secondary complications that often can result from cleft palate repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Deep fat of the face revisited

The midfacial deep fatty tissue has been divided into the buccal and parapharyngeal fat pads although the former carries several extensions in adults. Using histological sections of 15 large human fetuses, we demonstrated that the parapharyngeal fat pad corresponds to the major content of the prestyloid compartment of the parapharyngeal space or, simply, the prestyloid fat. The buccal and prestyloid fatty tissues were separated by the medial and lateral pterygoid muscles. In these tissues, superficial parts, corresponding to the lower body and the masseteric extension of the adult buccal fat pad, were well encapsulated and showed the most advanced stage of histogenesis. As the sphenoid bone was not fully developed even in the largest specimens, the temporal, infratemporal, and pterygopalatine fossae joined to provide a large space for a single, large upper extension of the buccal fat pad. In the intermediate part of the extension course, the larger specimens carried a narrower part between the maxilla and the temporalis muscle. The single, upper extension appeared to divide into several extensions, as seen in adults. The periocular fat was clearly separated from the upper extension of the buccal fat pad by the sheet-like orbitalis muscle. A communication between the prestyloid fat and the buccal fat pad likely occurred through a potential space along the lingual nerve immediately superior to the deep part of the submandibular gland. At this site, therefore, the prestyloid fat may be injured or infected when the buccal fat pad is treated surgically.