Management of paediatric mandibular condylar fractures with screw-based semi-rigid intermaxillary fixation

Patient outcomes and complications following various maxillomandibular fixation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Currently, there are several methods of achieving maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), each with its unique operative considerations and subsequent patient outcomes and complications. In this study, we reviewed the literature to evaluate and compare all MMF methods.

METHODS

A systematic review of all MMF types was conducted and post-operative outcome data were analyzed and compared among the different types. Conventional Erich arch bars were compared to hybrid arch bars, MMF screws, and eyelet interdental wiring. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine the mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a statistical significance of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 4234 articles identified, 24 were included, and 17 were meta-analyzed. Time to achieve MMF (-43.38 min; 95% CI, -58.20 to -28.56; P < 0.001), total operative time (-30.33 min; 95% CI, -61.05 to 0.39; P = 0.05), incidence of wire puncture injuries and glove perforations (0.11; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.30; P < 0.001), and incidence of poor oral hygiene (0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28; P < 0.001) were lower for alternative MMF interventions compared to those of the conventional Erich arch bars.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternative MMF methods required shorter operative time to achieve MMF and demonstrated other increased efficiencies of practice such as shorter total operative time and decreased glove perforations, when compared to conventional Erich arch bars. If a patient is a candidate for MMF, the presented alternative MMF techniques should be considered depending on the clinical context and availability of institutional resources.

Management of Mandibular Condyle Fractures in Paediatric Patients: a Systematic Review

Objectives

This systematic review searched three of the most used databases to assess if current evidence suggested a difference between surgical and non-surgical management of mandibular condyle fractures in paediatric patients.

Material and Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted of three well known databases - Ovid, PubMed and Web of Science. Studies included were conducted paediatric patients, in humans, written in English and published from January 1st 1996 until April 1st 2022. Data collection was carried out by two independent reviewers. Data collated from studies without high risk of bias was pooled for surgical vs non-surgical management and total tallies of all outcomes presented. Presence or absence of complications was recorded in 4 x 4 tables for each outcome and compared using a Chi-Square test.

Results

After duplicate records were removed, 182 records were screened. After exclusion of unsuitable reports, 20 were included in the review. Further analysis showed the included studies had high risk of bias. Given this, comparison of this pooled data showed no significant difference between management methods.

Conclusions

Presently it appears conservative management is functionally adequate without risks associated with surgical management, even though incidence of these risks was shown to be low in the studies included in this review.

Orthodontic Approaches in the Management of Mandibular Fractures: A Scoping Review

Non-surgical approaches have been proposed in the management of mandibular fractures, especially in children, but there is a lack of clear guidelines on the clinical indications of conservative approaches. The aim of this scoping review is to provide the available evidence of the role of the orthodontist in the management of mandibular fractures. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed to select eligible articles from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases according to precise inclusion criteria. The research questions were formulated as follows: "what is the scientific evidence concerning the rule of orthodontists in the management of mandibular fractures" and "the preferential use of the direct bonding technique with orthodontic brackets rather than rigid arch bars"? Seventeen articles were included. Five articles presented the use of removable acrylic splints or functional appliances, six articles concerned the employment of cemented acrylic or rigid splints, and six articles described the management of mandibular fractures in adults and children using orthodontic brackets or mini-screws. Most of these techniques have been employed in children and growing subjects, while fewer data were available regarding conservative treatments in adults. Preliminary evidence suggests that condylar and some minor parasymphyseal fractures in children may be managed with conservative approaches. In adults, minor condylar and stable body mandibular fractures with minimal displacement have been reduced similarly. However, there are no sufficient elements that could suggest the preferential use of orthodontic brackets over rigid arch bars in adults. Further randomized and non-randomized clinical trials with long follow-ups will be needed to better define the clinical indications of the orthodontic approaches in the management of mandibular fractures based on severity, location, and age.

Paediatric condylar trauma - primary management considerations - A review

Children are not simply ''small adults'', and the application of adult-type treatment can be inappropriate in many circumstances. Their craniomaxillofacial (CMF) structure changes dramatically as children grow and develop. This anatomical change also changes the location, pattern, and nature of CMF injury. Similarly, condylar architecture and anatomy also differ in children, due to which the management of paediatric condylar fractures is strikingly different from adult condylar fractures. In addition to this physiological, and behavioural differences pose an additional challenge to a surgeon. Paediatric condylar fracture also considers conservative/non-operative treatment as an effective treatment option. However, the decision between operative and non-operative management compromises paediatric facial growth, precise reduction, and rigid fixation. This decision is crucial and is guided by many factors. Improper treatment protocol can have a devastating effect on a child facial growth and development. It can lead to various deforming complications mainly ankylosis. Hence treatment of paediatric condylar fracture should be well planned and executed.

Treatment of pediatric bilateral condylar fractures: A comprehensive analysis

Pediatric bilateral condylar fractures (PBCF) is a rare clinical pathology, where the management is carried out with both conservative and surgical approaches. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare these two treatment approaches and their associated long term complications in PBCF. An extensive literature review- through the search of online databases- was conducted to survey, collect, analyze and compare the reported outcomes of different treatment modalities for PBCF. The number of studies presenting PBCF case reports was 16, while the number of such retrospective studies included here was 19. Analyses of these studies revealed that the conservative treatment is preferred in PBCF patients younger than 12 years of age. Moreover, a composite approach where the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is carried out for one side while the intermaxillary fixation (IMF) for the contralateral side is frequently reported for the management of PBCF cases; this approach appears effective in improving daily functioning of temporomandibular joint and reducing long term complications. Performing ORIF for one side while IMF for the contralateral side seems the most common treatment approach in PBCF. This study may help in rapid decision making for treatment selection of PBCF patients while minimizing the risk for late complications.

Fracture fragment of the condyle determines the ramus height of the mandible in children with intracapsular condylar fractures treated conservatively

This study aimed to explore and impart understanding of bone remodelling in children with intracapsular fractures treated conservatively. Records of children (less than 12 years), who sustained intracapsular fractures and treated conservatively, were retrieved consecutively for the period of March 2011 to February 2016. Data about age, gender, date of injury, dates of admission and discharge, mechanism of trauma, location and pattern of fracture, other mandibular fractures, treatment methods and time of review were recorded and analysed. Image dates of pre- and post-treatments, including date of review, were also recorded. A total of 22 patients complete their follow-up and show bone remodelling process. During their follow-up, all the displaced condylar fragments fused with the ramus stump at the displaced position. Regardless of the type of conservative procedure, both treatments cannot promote the spontaneous fracture reduction in patients with intracapsular condylar fractures. During follow-up, the absorption of the lateral process of the condyle after the closed treatment becomes close to the 'horizontal absorption', until the height (or articular surface) of the lateral condylar process dropped and aligned to the articular surface of the medial process. In children with intracapsular condylar fractures, the fracture fragment of the condyle determines the ramus height of the mandible. Closed treatment cannot restore the fracture fragment. If the height of the fracture fragments dropped remarkably, then open reduction and rigid internal fixation become more suitable.

Closed versus open reduction of facial fractures in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Treatment of facial fractures in children and adolescents has always been a challenge for oral surgeon. The choice of treatment type must take into account several factors. This systematic review aimed to evaluate closed versus open reduction of facial fractures for pediatric facial fractures.

Material and Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in three databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and The Cochrane Library) in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The PICO question was: Conservative treatment is more appropriate than surgical treatment for reducing facial fractures in children and adolescents? The full papers of 41 references were analyzed in detail. Eleven papers were included in this systematic review: one prospective study and ten retrospective studies. All studies evaluated the complication rate.

Results

A total of 73 (7.68%) of the 950 patients experienced complications. Among these patients, 24 (3.85%) had been treated with conservative treatment and 49 (15.03%) with surgical treatment. The fixed-effects model revealed a lower complication rate with conservative treatment than surgical treatment (P<0.00001; RR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.11-0.28). Heterogeneity was low for the complication rate outcome (X2: 5.64; P = 0.69; I2: 0%).

Conclusions

The present findings show that conservative treatment is more commonly performed for pediatric facial fractures and complications occur more with surgical treatment. Therefore, surgeons must evaluate all variables involved in choosing the most appropriate treatment method to ensure greater benefits to the patient with fewer complications. Key words:Closed fracture reduction, open fracture reduction, pediatrics, treatment failure.

The risk of tooth root injuries using cortical screws for intermaxillary fixation and osteosynthesis plates - A retrospective analysis

Intermaxillary fixation (IMF) and osteosynthesis plates (OP) are widely used for the non-surgical and surgical treatment of mandible and condyle fractures. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the frequency of tooth root injuries by IMF and OP screws. Electronic patient reports (2004-2013) were screened for patients treated with either IMF screws and/or OP in the Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany. The frequency and the position of endangered and injured teeth were analyzed by orthopantomogram (OPTG) and cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Next, possible predictive factors for tooth root injuries, namely interdental- and crestal distance, screw length and distance between tooth root and screw were evaluated. Further, the accuracy of OPTG vs. CBCT concerning the diagnosis of tooth root injuries was analyzed. Three-hundred sixty-six patients were included and 3388 teeth were defined as endangered by IMF- and OP screws. Overall, 16 injured teeth (0.5%) in 13 patients (3.55%) were detected. Nine injuries (56.3%) were caused by IMF- and seven injuries (43.8%) by OP screws. Three teeth were non-vital, one tooth had to be extracted. No correlation between the predictive factors crestal distance, screw length and tooth root injuries was found. If tooth injury occurred, a significant correlation between the interdental distance and the distance between tooth root and screw was found (κ = 0.48; p < 0,0001). Comparison between OPTG vs. CBCT demonstrated that many of the injuries that were seen in the OPTG (n = 230) could not be verified in the CBCT scans (n = 16) (κ = 0.12). To conclude, screws for IMF and OP can be considered as a safe procedure concerning the risk of tooth root injuries.

Abduction of the condyle head leads to condylar resorption: A radiologic study in children with intracapsular fractures

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore and make an understanding of absorption existed in children with intracapsular fractures.

METHODS

The sample was composed of all children (less than 12 years) who presented with intracapsular fractures within a 5-year period (January 2011 to April 2016). Data about age, gender, date of injury, dates of admission and discharge, transfer and/or referral by other clinics or local facilities, mechanism of trauma, location and pattern of fracture, associated injuries, centimeter of mouth opening, treatment methods, image date of pre- and post-treatment (including time of review), position of condylar head in pre-treatment or post-treatment, and absorption of condylar head in pre-treatment or post-treatment were recorded and analyzed. Data analysis included the Chi-Square test, the Fisher exact test, and the t-test. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to control the confounding variables. Probabilities of p less than 0.05 were considered statistically significantly different.

RESULTS

In the 5 years records retrieved during this study, 93 children patients sustained a total of 140 condylar head fractures. Statistical analysis revealed that abduction of condylar process in post-treatment was highly related to the condylar absorption. Patients associated with other mandibular fractures were highly related to abduction of condylar process. Patients with condylar head fractures, the closer to the medial of the condylar process, the higher the risk of abduction of the condyle. No matter what kind of treatment method is used, it is very difficult to reverse the abduction of condylar process in children patients with intracapsular fractures efficaciously.

CONCLUSION

Abduction of condylar process in post-treatment was highly related to the condylar absorption. Patients associated with other mandibular fractures were highly related to abduction of condylar process. Children patients who presented with condylar head fractures, the closer to the medial of the condylar process the higher the risk of abduction of the condyle. Neither surgery nor conservative treatment can recover the abduction of condylar process efficaciously.

Mandibular condylar fractures in children and adolescents: 5-Year retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the demographic characteristics of mandibular condylar fractures between children and adolescents.

METHODS

The sample was composed of all children (less than 12 years) and adolescents (between 13 and 18 years old) who presented with mandibular condylar fractures within a 5-year period (January 2011 to April 2016). The age, gender, time of injury, mechanism of trauma, location and pattern of fracture, associated injuries and treatment methods were recorded and analysed. Data analysis included chi-square test and Fisher exact test. Differences at p less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 111 children and 39 adolescent patients with condylar fractures were registered and compared. More children than adolescents were involved in falls from a height (p = 0.007), but nearly no relationship was observed between the trauma aetiology and type of condylar fracture in the two patient groups. Condylar head fractures occurred most frequently in the children and adolescents, especially in the children (p < 0.05). Condylar neck fractures were more frequently observed in the adolescent patients (p < 0.001) than in the children. Green-stick fractures occurred only in the child patients (p = 0.005). The patients who fractured other sites of the mandible tended to show a decreased frequency of dislocation (condylar head was out of the glenoid fossa) (p = 0.024). Symphysis/para-symphysis fractures were highly common in the children who sustained unilateral condylar fractures, compared to adolescents (p < 0.05). The patients with bilateral condylar fractures were more frequently associated with other mandibular fractures (children, p = 0.001; adolescents, p = 0.011), especially the fracture of the mandibular body or symphysis. The children who sustained extracapsular fractures were more prone to fractures of other mandibular sites (p = 0.009), especially fracture of the symphysis/para-symphysis (p = 0.014). Intracapsular fractures in children were treated non-surgically more frequently than surgically (p < 0.001). The extracapsular fractures (mild and serious fractures) in children were also treated non-surgically more frequently (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The trauma mechanisms, incidence, pattern and treatment of condylar fractures in children substantially differ from those in adolescents. This study was conducted to enable the understanding of the differences in condylar fractures between children and adolescents. Accordingly, preventive measures and treatment plans in children or adolescents should be applied differently.

Erich arch bar versus hanger plate technique for intermaxillary fixation in fracture mandible: A prospective comparative study

Introduction:

Various methods have been described for intermaxillary fixation (IMF) for treatment of faciomaxillary injuries. Many studies have been described to evaluate the efficacy of different methods. Hanger plate method has not been commonly used. The aim of the present study was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of this method over Erich arch bar in mandibular fracture.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty patients of only mandibular fracture presenting to trauma center requiring open reduction and internal fixation under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to Group A and Group B comprising thirty patients in each. Group A included patients who received IMF with Erich arch bar. Group B included patients who received IMF with hanger plate method. The two groups were compared for time duration of intermaxillary procedure, total duration of surgery, oral hygiene score, postoperative occlusion, and complications.

Results:

The average time of intermaxillary procedure, total duration of surgery, and wire prick injuries were more in Group A. Oral hygiene score was significantly better in Group B. Postoperative occlusion was comparable between the two groups. There was screw loosening in four patients in Group B, but none had tooth root injury. The cost of material for IMF was more in Group B.

Conclusion:

IMF with hanger plate method is more safe and efficacious compared to Erich arch bar in the treatment of mandibular fractures.

Functional Treatment of a Child with Extracapsular Mandibular Fracture

Condylar fractures are among the most frequent fractures in the context of traumatic lesions of the face. The management of condylar fractures is still controversial, especially when fractures occur in children: if overlooked or inappropriately treated, these lesions may lead to severe sequelae, both cosmetic and functional. The therapy must be careful because severe long-term complications can occur. In this case report, the authors present a case of mandibular fracture in which the decision between surgical therapy and functional therapeutic regimen may be controversial due to the particular anatomy of the fracture line and the age of the patient.

Intermaxillary Fixation Screw Morbidity in Treatment of Mandibular Fractures-A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate the morbidity of screws used for intermaxillary fixation (IMF) in the treatment of mandibular fractures. A review of the published data was also performed for a comparison of outcomes. Our hypothesis was that the use of screws for IMF of mandibular fractures would result in minimal morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated for mandibular fractures from 2007 to 2013, using screws for IMF, using the international diagnosis code for mandibular fracture, DS026, were anonymously selected (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark). The fracture type, radiographic findings, treatment modality, screw type and number, and root damage were recorded. For the outcome comparison, a review of the published data regarding iatrogenic dental root damage caused by screw fixation was performed in May 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients had undergone IMF with screws. The total number of screws was 793. The incidence of root lesions was 0.25% centrally and 0.88% peripherally. The incidence of screw loss was 0.13% and that of screw loosening was 1.89%. In the review, 737 related reports were identified in a search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Of these, 25 were considered suitable for inclusion. A lack of valid evidence resulted in a descriptive analysis, because a meta-analysis of the data was not possible.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present retrospective study have shown that the use of screws is a valid choice for IMF in mandibular fracture treatment with minimal morbidity. The 793 screws used for IMF resulted in a negligible amount of central and peripheral tooth root trauma.

Conservative treatment of bilateral condylar fractures in children: case report and review of the literature

Two children (11 year old) with bilateral condylar fractures associated with symphysis fracture were conservatively treated. Both of them were followed up for about 1 year. A review of 21 cases of bilateral condylar fracture available in the literature revealed the younger the patient, the better the outcome of TMJ function or in radiographic remodeling. However, the longer the time elapsed, the higher the incidence of remodeling deformity and dysfunction. Thus, it must be better that a close follow-up of bilateral condylar fracture in children should be continued until the end of growth period.

A retrospective study of temporomandibular joint ankylosis secondary to surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures

We investigated the incidence of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) after open operations for fractures of the mandibular condyle, and analysed possible risk factors in a total of 385 patients with 492 condylar fractures who had been operated on in our department from 2001 to 2010. Sixteen patients developed postoperative ankylosis of the TMJ with 26 joints (5%) affected during a follow-up of 6 months-10 years. Of the 492 condylar fractures, the most common ones that were associated with postoperative ankylosis were those of the condylar head (20/248), followed by the condylar neck (6/193). Subcondylar fractures did not cause postoperative ankylosis (0/51). Among the 16 patients with postoperative ankylosis, 13 had associated anterior mandibular fractures. Long-screw (bicortical screw) fixation of fractures of the condylar head seemed to be associated with a lower incidence of postoperative ankylosis than fixation by miniplate and wire or removal of the fractured fragment. The articular discs were damaged in all ankylosed joints, and the remaining fractured fragment was found in 10 ankylosed joints after fractures of the condylar head. The results suggest that fractures of the condylar head are more prone to lead to postoperative ankylosis of the TMJ, and that the possible risk factors seem to include the technique used for fixation and damage to the disc, together with an anterior mandibular fracture with the fractured fragment remaining.