In vitro mechanical assessment of 2.0-mm system three-dimensional miniplates in anterior mandibular fractures

Herbert Cannulated Bone Screw Osteosynthesis in Anterior Mandibular Fracture Treatment: A Comparative Study With Lag Screw and Miniplate

PURPOSE

The Herbert bone screw (HBS) is a successful and minimally invasive method of fracture fixation that is used routinely in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performances of the HBS in the treatment of anterior mandibular fractures and compare it with the common and established treatment modalities, the lag screw (LS) and the 2.0-mm miniplate (MP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study implemented a randomized clinical trial and enrolled a sample of patients with anterior mandibular fractures. The primary predictor variable was treatment group categorized as HBS, LS, or MP fixation of the fracture. Primary outcome variables were the presence of interfragmentary mobility and radiodensitometric appraisal of fracture healing progression. The secondary outcome was the postoperative clinical evaluation. Other variables collected were grouped into demographic, fracture location, and intraoperative clinical data. All recorded data were documented, tabulated, computed, and analyzed. Statistical significance was set at the 5% level.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were selected and randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups based on the fixation modality used. There were no relevant differences in demographic data for the 3 groups. There were no statistically relevant differences in clinical evaluation outcomes. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the gain of mean postoperative bone density between the HBS and MP groups (P = .012) and between the LS and MP groups (P = .045), but not between the HBS and LS groups.

CONCLUSION

Cannulated HBS osteosynthesis provides a successful and minimally invasive treatment modality for the management of anterior mandibular fractures.

Is the Three-Dimensional Strut Plate an Adequate Fixation Technique for Mandibular Symphysis Fractures?

PURPOSE

We present a series of cases of mandibular symphysis fractures treated at our institution with a 3-dimensional strut plate. The aim of the present study was to confirm the stability of this fixation technique and discuss its advantages, disadvantages, and potential complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgery by the same surgeon at our institution from July 2012 to April 2014 for a mandible fracture with a symphysis component. The patients were evaluated to identify aspects of occlusion, fracture mobility, postoperative infection, and the need for hardware removal.

RESULTS

The sample included 12 subjects who had met the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were a linear noncomminuted fracture, sufficient distance from the mental foramina, a maximum of 5 days between the trauma and surgery, and a minimum postoperative period of 3 months. The mean age of the sample was 33.4 years, and 1 of the 12 patients (8.3%) was female. Of the 12 patients, 10 did well, and 2 developed a surgical site infection, 1 of whom also experienced nonunion and required additional fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest a 3-dimensional strut plate applied to symphysis fractures provides adequate fracture stabilization with a risk of complications comparable to that of more traditional fixation methods. In addition, the technique has the added advantage of minimal manipulation and adaptation, which could shorten the overall operating time.