Local full-thickness skin graft of the donor arm—a novel technique for the reduction of donor site morbidity in radial forearm free flap

The Radial Forearm Butterfly Flap: A Novel Technique for Oral Cavity Reconstruction With Primary Healing of the Forearm Donor Area

BACKGROUND

The traditional radial forearm free flap (TRFFF) combined with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) for repairing oral defects presents unavoidable donor area complications, such as delayed healing and scar hyperplasia. This study introduces a modified radial forearm free flap, known as the butterfly flap, which enables primary closure of the forearm donor area.

METHODS

The study included 35 patients who received the butterfly flap and 40 patients who received TRFFF combined with STSG between March 2022 and March 2024. We compared subjective evaluations of postoperative pain and scar degree in the donor area as well as objective assessments of preoperative and postoperative grip strength, key pinch strength, and postoperative donor area complications between the two groups.

RESULTS

The delayed wound healing rate was 5.7% (2/35) in the butterfly flap group and 25.0% (10/40) in the TRFFF group, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.023). The postoperative scar score of the donor site in the butterfly flap group was significantly lower than that in the TRFFF group (5.57 ± 1.24 vs. 7.10 ± 1.24, p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pain severity scores, incidence of other donor complications, and changes in grip and key pinch strength.

CONCLUSION

The radial forearm butterfly flap can directly close the donor area wound without skin grafting, reducing scar formation and the delayed healing rate of the donor area.

Challenges in Radial Forearm Free Flap Surgery: A Comprehensive Case Analysis of Septic Complications at the Donor Site

ABSTRACT

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) has emerged as a leading option for microvascular reconstruction of head and neck soft-tissue defects. Despite the favorable outcomes conferred by RFFFs, complications such as skin graft loss and tendon exposure can occur. We present the case of a 77-year-old man who underwent RFFF reconstruction after excision of squamous cell carcinoma from the head and neck. The patient subsequently developed flexor tenosynovitis, septic arthritis of the wrist, and osteomyelitis of several carpal bones as a direct result of partial skin graft loss and prolonged tendon exposure at the donor site. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of this specific complication. Review of the literature reveals the need for continued research into RFFF donor site complications to mitigate the incidence of significant morbidity.

Comparison of split thickness skin graft versus full thickness skin graft for radial forearm flap donor site closure: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The radial forearm flap (RFF) is one of the most commonly used flaps in reconstructive surgery. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) has traditionally been used for closure of the forearm. However, full-thickness skin grafting (FTSG) has gained in popularity to achieve more satisfactory results. The aim of the study is to identify the best RFF donor site closure technique by comparing the functional and aesthetic outcomes of STSG and FTSG.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried. Only studies comparing complications rate, functional and aesthetic outcomes between STSG and FTSG were included. The primary outcome was graft failure rate. Secondary outcomes included the aesthetic result and functionality of the forearm/wrist.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included in this review, accounting for a total of 712 patients with mean age of 60.7 years. Overall, 348 patients underwent FTSG and 377 underwent STSG. The mean follow-up was 14.7 months. The rate of graft failure in FTSG was significantly higher compared to STSG (OR: 2.79, 95 % CI 1.38-5.65, p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in rate of tendon exposure (OR: 0.83, p = 0.65) and infection (OR: 1.37, p = 0.42). Regarding the aesthetic outcome, no significant difference between FTSG and STSG based on observer (SMD = -0.37, p = 0.17) and patient (SMD = -0.016, p = 0.93) assessment, respectively. Overall postoperative functional assessment showed a not severely impaired hand and arm function in both groups. Subjective evaluation of pain was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

FTSG is associated with higher risk of graft failure than STSG in RFF donor site closure, without significant improvement in aesthetic results.

Biomechanical and aesthetic outcomes following radial forearm free flap transfer: comparison of ipsilateral full-thickness skin graft and traditional split-thickness skin graft

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is associated with donor site morbidity. This study aimed to quantify the functional and aesthetic outcomes after closure of the RFFF donor site using triangular full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) harvested adjacent to the flap or traditional split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs). The study included patients who underwent oral cavity reconstruction with an RFFF between March 2017 and August 2021. The patients were divided into two groups based on the donor site closure method: FTSG or STSG. The primary outcomes were biomechanical grip strength, pinch strength, and range of wrist movements. Subjective donor site morbidity, aesthetic and functional results were also analysed. The study included 75 patients (FTSG n = 35; STSG n = 40). Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant difference in grip strength (P = 0.049) and wrist extension (P = 0.047) between the FTSG and STSG groups, in favour of the STSG. Differences between the groups in pinch strength and other wrist motions were not statistically significant. The harvesting time was significantly shorter for the FTSG (P = 0.041) and the appearance of the donor site was better (P = 0.026) when compared to the STSG. Cold intolerance was more frequent in the STSG group (32.5% STSG vs 6.7% FTSG; P = 0.017). Subjective function, numbness, pain, hypertrophic scar, itching, and social stigma did not differ significantly between the groups. Compared with the STSG, the FTSG showed better cosmesis and avoided additional donor sites, with clinically negligible differences in hand biomechanics.

Coverage of radial forearm free flap donor site defect using another free flap

BACKGROUND

Donor site defects following the radial forearm flap (RFF) harvest have been usually covered with skin grafting, which often lead to suboptimal outcomes and donor morbidities, including delayed healing and scar contractures. The present report aimed to evaluate the outcomes of using another free flap, the domino flap, for coverage of donor site defects following RFFF harvest.

METHODS

Five patients (two males and three females) who underwent coverage of donor defects of RFFF using another free flap between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed. Their mean age was 74 years and the mean dimension of the defect of the RFF donor site was 8.7 × 5.6 cm. Four patients used an anterolateral thigh flap and one used a superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap.

RESULTS

The mean size of the domino flaps were 12.2 × 5.8 cm. Distal stumps of radial vessels adopting retrograde flow were used as recipients in four cases, and proximal ones adopting anterograde in one. The donor site of the domino flaps was primarily closed. All patients recovered well without any postoperative complications. Aesthetically pleasing outcomes with no functional impairment related to scar contractures were observed in the donor site of RFF during the mean follow-up of 15.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of another free flap for coverage of RFFF donor defects may provide rapid wound healing and satisfactory outcomes, and may be considered an alternative option in cases with large-sized defects that are expected to take a long time to achieve complete healing with skin grafting.

Novel V-shaped kiss flap harvest technique for the forearm free flap in soft tissue reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Radial forearm flap (RFF) is widely used in oral reconstruction. However, the donor-site defect remains the main limit. In this paper, V-shaped kiss RFF (VRFF) is described as a novel technique to improve aesthetics and function of it. A retrospective study was conducted to introduce VRFF and evaluate its effect and safety.

METHODS

A total of 21 patients who underwent VRFF for oral reconstruction, and 23 patients who underwent conventional RFF from February 2016 to April 2018 were included in this study. Direct comparisons were made on patient's subjective evaluation of postoperative hand function and degree of scarring and objective donor-site function assessment including range of wrist movements and grip strength before and after surgery between the two groups.

RESULTS

No skin grafts were used in the VRFF group, and 20 of 21 patients achieved primary healing at donor site, while all patients from the RFF group had skin grafts. And 18 of 23 patients achieved primary healing. The postoperative scar score of donor site in the VRFF group was significantly higher than that in the RFF group (3.4 vs 2.8, P = 0.035). There were no significant differences in other subjective evaluation and donor-site morbidity and hand function assessment.

CONCLUSION

VRFF is able to provide a new and simple method to close donor-site defect and realize a better healing in donor site.

Secondary healing property using Neoveil®, a polyglycolic acid bioabsorbable sheet on the oral mucosal defects

Neoveil® is a wound surface-covering agent composed of polyglycolic acid(PGA) effective for secondary healing. This study evaluated the secondary healing property of oral cavity mucosal defects using the PGA sheet. Thirty-four patients who underwent surgical excision of oral benign and malignant lesions, precancerous lesions, and tumors were evaluated. The PGA sheet was placed over the open wound to aid secondary healing. The defects were reviewed post-operatively for secondary healing, contracture, and secondary deformity. Male to female ratio was 20:14, and the mean age was 63.5 years. In all cases, the oral mucosal defect was present after the wide excision of the mucosal lesion. The PGA sheet was used as a surface covering agent which was found to be effective in secondary healing of the wound. Any side effects and adverse reactions which were caused by the PGA sheet was not evident. It can be used to avoid skin graft or free flap reconstruction or deformity from the direct closure in moderate size oral mucosal defect.

Reducing morbidity in radial forearm free flap donor site: a review of closure techniques

PURPOSE

Radial forearm free tissue transfer (RFFF) has been an extremely reliable reconstructive option for head and neck oncologic defects for over 30 years. With high reliability, interest has shifted in minimizing donor site morbidity, much of which results from closure techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Portable negative pressure wound devices, newer dermal substitutes, and local flap techniques have improved donor site aesthetics and function.

SUMMARY

Outcomes of the RFFF donor site may benefit from newer techniques in closure.

Delayed Versus Primary Closure of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Adults: Short-Term Soft Tissue Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of delayed closures, whether delayed primary closure (DPC) or split-thickness skin grafting (STSG), of operatively treated forearm fractures on short-term soft tissue outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort comparative study of two academic-level one trauma centers from 2010 to 2020, adult patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were either closed primarily at index surgery, or underwent delayed closure, either with DPC or with a STSG. Primary outcome measures were soft-tissue outcomes as measured by wound healing (delayed healing, dehiscence, or skin breakdown) and fracture-related infection (FRI) at time of final follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients with 81 diaphyseal forearm fractures underwent ORIF with a mean follow-up of 14.3 months. Forty-one fractures (50.6%) were open injuries. Thirteen patients (16.0%) were unable to be closed primarily and underwent an average of 2.46 ± 0.7 surgeries including final coverage, with an average of 4.31 ± 2.8 days to final coverage. Four patients (30.8%) underwent DPC and 9 (69.2%) underwent STSG. Five (6.6%) patients in the delayed closure group had pre-operative compartment syndrome and underwent formal two-incision fasciotomies. There were no significant differences between delayed versus primary closure in wound healing complication rates, FRI, or radiographic union.

CONCLUSIONS

Diaphyseal forearm fractures that undergo ORIF have equivalent short-term soft tissue outcomes when closed primarily at index surgery or when closed in a delayed fashion.

Free Skin Grafting to Reconstruct Donor Sites after Radial Forearm Flap Harvesting: A Prospective Study with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)

Reconstruction of the donor site after radial forearm flap harvesting is a common procedure in maxillofacial plastic surgery. It is normally carried out with split-thickness or full-thickness free skin grafts. Unfortunately, free skin graft transplantation faces wound healing impairments such as necrosis, (partial) graft loss, or tendon exposure. Several studies have investigated methods to reduce these impairments and demonstrated improvements if the wound bed is optimised, for example, through negative-pressure wound therapy or vacuum-assisted closure. However, these methods are device-dependent, expansive, and time-consuming. Therefore, the application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to the wound bed could be a simple, cost-effective, and device-independent method to optimise wound-bed conditions instead. In this study, PRF membranes were applied between the wound bed and skin graft. Results of this study indicate improvements in the PRF versus non-PRF group (93.44% versus 86.96% graft survival, p = 0.0292). PRF applied to the wound bed increases graft survival and reduces impairments. A possible explanation for this is the release of growth factors, which stimulate angiogenesis and fibroblast migration. Furthermore, the solid PRF membranes act as a mechanical barrier ("lubrication" layer) to protect the skin graft from tendon motion. The results of this study support the application of PRF in donor-site reconstruction with free skin grafts.

Repair of Donor Site Defects After Forearm Free Flap Harvest With Dual Triangular Flaps and in Situ Small Full-thickness Skin Flaps

PURPOSES

The aim of this study was to introduce a method for repairing donor site defects after harvesting forearm free flaps with dual triangular flaps combined with in situ small full-thickness skin flaps.

METHODS

Free forearm skin flaps were applied to repair defects after tumor resection in 25 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Although forearm free flaps were prepared, dual triangular flaps and adjacent full-thickness skin flaps were designed and fabricated to repair donor site defects in situ.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases of forearm donor site defects were successfully repaired with dual triangular flaps combined with in situ small full-thickness skin grafts. All adjacent full-thickness skin grafts used to close the donor site defect of the forearm survived, and the wound healed well without delayed wound rupture or serious complications at the donor site. The movement of the elbow and wrist joint on the side of the flap was normal, the blood supply in the palm was normal, and the skin color at the donor site of the forearm skin flap was similar to that of the surrounding tissue. There was no dent deformity or contracture deformity. Moreover, there was no significant difference in swelling and wrist movement between the adjacent forearm skin grafting group and the abdominal skin grafting group, but the former technique reduced the risk of scar infection and tendon exposure and greatly improved the esthetics of the surgical site on the forearm.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified donor dual triangular flaps combined with adjacent full-thickness skin grafts can reduce the recovery time during and after surgery and avoid trauma at a third surgical site. This method is worthy of practical application in the preparation of forearm skin flaps for oral and maxillofacial surgery.

The Use of Dermal Substitutes for Donor Site Closure After Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvesting

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to analyze the aesthetic and functional outcome in the radial forearm free flap donor site using a simple split thickness skin grafting (STSG) closure compared with the use of dermal scaffold supporting the STSG closure.

METHODS

The study analyzed 18 patients, divided in 2 groups based on the donor site closure modality. In STSG group, a simple STSG was used to cover the defect. In the DS + STSG group, the defect was covered by the use of dermal substitute (MatriDerm) supporting the STSG. Groups were compared on the following outcome variable: scar status; hand function; circumferences at most proximal and most distal point of the graft. All patients were followed up 1, 6, and 12 months post-operative.

RESULTS

Nine patients from STSG group showed a difference in circumference between the operated and contralateral limbs respectively of 2.9 mm proximal and 1.2 mm distal; in the 9 patients of DS + STGS group the difference was respectively of 1.2 mm proximal and 1.3 mm distal. Welch unequal variances t-test demonstrated statistical significance of the values with P < 0.004 (P < 0.5). The average VSS was 1.82 ± 0.2 for STSG group and 1.75 ± 0.2 for DS + STGS group. The DASH score was 21.8% in STSG group and 19.4% in DS + STGS group.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that patients treated with Matriderm + STSG obtained a better result both in esthetic and functional outcomes.

A Novel Design of V-shaped Radial Forearm Free Flap Facilitates the Direct Closure of Donor Site Wound

ABSTRACT

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is one of the commonly used flaps in the repair of head and neck soft tissue defects, especially small and medium-sized defects. The free skin grafts from abdomen are usually used to repair the RFFF donor site wound. This study aims to design a novel V-shaped RFFF, hoping that it might facilitate the direct closure of the forearm donor site wound. From August to December in 2019, 20 patients with oral cancers received radical surgeries, and V-shaped RFFFs were designed to repair the soft defects and the forearm donor site wound was directly closed. The patients were followed up for 6 months to assess the final outcome of repair. The results showed that the pre-designed V-shaped RFFF met the needs of soft tissue defect repair, with the size ranging from 24 cm2 to 30 cm2. Fifteen patients with tongue cancers and four with buccal cancers had satisfactory repair results, and only one patient with buccal cancer had mild limitation of mouth opening. There were 3 patients with a small area of ischemia. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 13.85 ± 1.09 days. In 5 patients, wrist tilt motility decreased compared with that before surgery. The postoperative influence score of wrist exercise on daily life was 2.75 ± 0.44 points. In conclusion, the V-shaped RFFF can meet the needs of small and medium-sized defect repair. This novel design can directly close the forearm donor site wound, which avoids surgical trauma to secondary donor site, and significantly reduces related complications.

Donor site sequelae and patient satisfaction after head and neck reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap

PURPOSE

Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) being a workhorse flap in head and neck reconstruction, we investigated its donor site delayed consequences.

METHODS

Multicentric case series evaluating 189 patients who underwent RFFF for carcinologic reasons at least 6 months before. Patients and surgeon's appreciation regarding the aesthetic and functional consequences of the flap harvest on their daily life were evaluated by questionnaires using likert scales. Medical data were collected from patients' charts retrospectively.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of patients had at least one sequelae. Experiencing a graft necrosis did not worsen long-term results. Cosmetic satisfaction was significantly worst for women, according to patients' and surgeons' opinion. For 81% and 92% patients, respectively, the flap harvest had no impact on daily life nor sport practice. Ratio between the benefits of reconstruction and the sequelae at the donor site was judged "excellent" for 77% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although objectively important, RFFF morbidity has little impact in head and neck cancer patient's life.

Closure of the radial forearm free flap donor site with split-thickness skin graft or amniotic membrane: A prospective randomized clinical study

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, aesthetic, and functional outcomes between amniotic membrane (test group) and split-thickness skin grafts (control group) used for radial forearm free flap defect closure. The primary outcome measurement for both groups was assessment of the defect closure healing process. In addition, aesthetic (Vancouver Scar Scale) and functional outcomes (skin sensitivity, hand/wrist functionality, grip strength) were evaluated. Fifty eligible patients with radial forearm free flap donor site defects were randomly assigned to two groups receiving either amniotic membrane (test group; n = 25) or split-thickness skin graft (control group; n = 25) for defect covering. Forty-seven of the 50 patients (n = 47) were able to be followed up for 6 months and showed a significantly longer healing process (p < 0.001) with amniotic membrane (64.5 ± 38.4 days; n = 24) than with split-thickness skin grafts (29.2 ± 8.9 days; n = 23); however, there were no differences in the prevalence of healing defects/dehiscence and/or wound infections. Forty-two of the 47 patients (21 in each group) were able to be continually followed up for 12 months, and showed no differences in terms of clinical outcome as well as the subjective and objective aesthetic and functional results evaluated. With regard to the clinical, aesthetic, and functional outcomes evaluated for radial forearm free flap defects, coverage with amniotic membrane offers an excellent alternative treatment approach, avoiding secondary induced donor site morbidity.

The use of ipsilateral skin grafts or local flaps for the closure of a free radial forearm flap donor site: a systematic review

Skin grafts from distant sites are typically used to close free radial forearm flap (FRFF) donor sites. However, a variety of closure methods have been reported that avoid a second donor site. These are divided into four groups: separately combined full-thickness skin graft (FTSG), FTSG method based on V-Y closure, perforator flap, and non-perforator flap. We aimed to assess the differences in outcomes, including adapted FRFF size and postoperative complications, among the four groups of closure methods used for FRFF defects. Applying the Preferred Reporting Items for the PRISMA protocol systematic reviews and meta-analysis, the PubMed and MEDLINE medical databases were searched from inception to September 2020 to identify articles about closure using an ipsilateral FTSG or local flap of the FRFF donor site. Study characteristics, FRFF size, complication rates were extracted for analysis. Twenty-four studies were included for analysis. The FTSG method based on V-Y closure was the most widely used and could be adapted to the largest and more variable FRFF sizes. The short-term complications rate was lowest for the FTSG method based on V-Y closure and the highest for the perforator flap method. The FTSG method based on V-Y closure was considered to be the most convenient and reliable. However, FRFF size should be restricted to ≤60 cm², and the non-perforator flap can be a good choice if FRFF is <35 cm².

Are hand biomechanics affected following radial forearm flap harvest? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Donor site morbidity following radial forearm flap (RFF) harvest remains a controversial issue. The aim of this meta-analysis was to answer the question "Are the range of wrist movements (range of motion, ROM) and hand strength affected after RFF harvesting?" The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched (to December 2019). Self-controlled studies evaluating hand biomechanics after RFF harvest were included. Weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model. The outcome variables were ROM, forearm movements, grip, and pinch strengths. Thirteen studies involving a total of 335 patients were included. With the exception of grip strength and supination, which showed statistically significant reductions of about 2.40 kg and 2.86° (P <  0.05), all other ROM, forearm movements, and pinch strengths showed an insignificant difference when the operated hand was compared to the non-operated hand (P >  0.05). Regression analysis showed that the method of donor site closure and size of the donor site defect had an insignificant impact on hand biomechanics. This study confirms the lack of discernible biomechanical morbidity after RFF transfer. The minimal reduction in hand biomechanics after RFF is considered to be clinically negligible.

A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Medial Sural Artery Perforator versus Radial Forearm Flap for Tongue Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 For tongue reconstruction, the radial forearm flap (RFF) is commonly used. In the last decade, the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has been successfully used with reportedly superior donor-site outcomes. Our study is the first to compare the RFF and MSAP for reconstruction of partial glossectomy defects (<50% of tongue).

METHODS

 We conducted a retrospective review of 20 patients with partial glossectomy defects reconstructed at a tertiary referral center. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Objective measures of speech, swallowing, and subjective patient satisfaction with their donor site were recorded.

RESULTS

 Ten RFF and MSAP were each used, with a mean partial glossectomy defect size of 40.5 and 43.5%, respectively. The MSAP was significantly thicker (7.8 vs. 4.3 mm, p < 0.05) with a longer harvest time (122.5 vs. 75.0 minutes, p < 0.05). There were no cases of free flap failure. Donor-site healing times were comparable, but the MSAP group experienced significantly less donor-site complications (n = 1 vs. n = 7, p < 0.05). Functional outcomes were comparable with 13 patients achieving normal speech and diet after 3 months (MSAP = 6 vs. RFF = 7, p = 1.00). All patients were satisfied with their donor-site outcome with the MSAP group having a marginally higher score.

CONCLUSION

 Both flaps are good options for partial glossectomy reconstruction. Though more challenging to harvest, the MSAP gives comparable functional results and has become our first reconstructive option given its superior donor-site outcomes.

Reconstructing Forearm Free Flap Donor Sites Using Full-Thickness Skin Grafts Harvested from the Ipsilateral Arm

Objective

To compare morbidity and aesthetic outcomes of full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) and split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) in the reconstruction of the forearm free flap donor site.

Study Design

Case series, retrospective chart review.

Setting

Institutional microvascular database.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects who underwent forearm free flaps and FTSGs for donor site reconstruction from April 2016 to November 2017 were included. FTSGs were obtained from the donor forearm with a proximal S-shaped incision, thereby avoiding additional wound creation. Morbidity outcomes were compared to 68 consecutive patients with STSG reconstruction from January 2009 to May 2010. Complications, including tendon exposure, subjective functional impairment, complete graft loss, partial graft loss, infection, paresthesias, and hematoma/seroma, were evaluated, as were aesthetic outcomes.

Results

Sixty-eight patients underwent FTSG reconstruction. No significant differences between FTSGs and STSGs were demonstrated in terms of graft loss ≥40% (4% vs 4%, P = 1.000), partial graft loss (<40%) (29% vs 40%, P = .207), tendon exposure (9% vs 12%, P = .573), infection (15% vs 13%, P = .805), paresthesias (12% vs 7%, P = .382), subjective functional impairment (0% vs 2%, P = .316), or hematoma/seroma (2% vs 0%, P = .316). Aesthetic outcomes were better in the FTSG group compared to the STSG group, as determined by both patients ( P = .004) and surgeon ( P < .001).

Conclusions

Our results advocate for the consideration of FTSGs in the reconstruction of the forearm free flap donor site given superior aesthetic results without additional donor site morbidity or additional wound creation when compared to STSGs.

Closure of radial forearm free flap donor site: A comparative study between keystone flap and skin graft

BACKGROUND

The aim was to investigate the feasibility of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site closure by keystone flap (KF) and compare its outcomes to those of skin graft (SG) closure.

METHODS

One hundred and one patients who underwent RFFF for head and neck reconstruction were included (35 KF closure and 65 SG closure). Duration of wound healing and donor site complications was collected. After a minimal follow-up of 1 year, patients were questioned about functional and esthetic impairment.

RESULTS

Coverage of donor site by KF was successful in all cases. The duration of wound healing was longer after SG than after KF (32 days vs 18 days, P < .001). Healing complications, esthetic and functional results were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Forearm donor site closure by KF is a feasible alternative to the traditional SG. Its main advantages are the reduced wound healing time and the avoidance of a second donor site.

Donor site morbidity following radial forearm free flap reconstruction with split thickness skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy

Background

Donor site complications secondary to radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction can limit recovery. Optimizing hand and wrist function in the post-operative period may allow more efficient self-care and return to activities of daily living. Negative pressure wound dressings (NPD) may increase blood flow and perfusion as compared to static pressure dressings (SPD) designed to minimize shear forces during the healing period. This study aims to compare subjective and objective hand and wrist functional outcomes following RFFF reconstruction with split thickness skin grafts (STSG) in patients treated with NPD and SPD.

Methods

Adult patients undergoing RFFF with STSG were identified preoperatively and randomized to receive NPD or SPD following their RFFF reconstruction. NPD involved a single-use, portable device capable of applying 80 mmHg of negative pressure to the forearm donor site. SPD involved a volar splint. Dressings were left in place for seven days with subjective and objective function assessed at seven days, one month and three months postoperatively. The primary outcome was self-reported hand function as measured with the function subscale of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ). Secondary outcomes included hand and wrist strength, range of motion, sensation, scar aesthetics, and skin graft complications.

Results

Twenty-four patients undergoing RFFF were randomized to NPD or SPD. Patients treated with NPD had improved MHQ self-reported functional scores as compared to those treated with SPD at seven days postoperatively (P = 0.016). Flexion at seven days was improved in NPD group (P = 0.031); however, all other strength and range of motion outcomes were similar between groups. There were no differences in rates of graft complications, scar aesthetics, or sensation.

Conclusions

In the immediate post-operative period, NPD was associated with improved patient-reported hand and wrist function. Wound care to optimize hand and wrist function could allow for improved patient outcomes in the immediate postoperative period.

Subjective morbidity following radial free flap reconstruction in head and neck tumour patients

Objective

Evaluation of post-operative donor site disability remains unaddressed in radial forearm free flap cases. This study aimed to assess donor site dysfunction following radial forearm free flap harvest using validated general, disease-specific and site-specific disability questionnaires.

Methods

In this retrospective case series of 24 patients at a tertiary academic medical centre, patients were assessed using the Short Form 36 Health Survey, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. One-sample z-tests were performed, comparing means of the cohort to controls.

Results

Compared to population controls, the cohort had higher mean scores for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (18.22 vs 10.1, p &lt; 0.01), and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire bothersome index (21.44 vs 13.77, p = 0.04), and a lower mean score for the Short Form 36 Health Survey physical component (38.88 vs 50, p &lt; 0.01), indicating a greater disability for the cohort compared to controls.

Conclusion

Radial forearm free flap harvest causes significant long-term donor site disability in head and neck tumour patients. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire is a concise tool for measuring this dysfunction.

Minimizing free flap donor-site morbidity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fasciocutaneous and osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction has significantly changed the way surgeons reconstruct defects following ablation of head and neck tumors. Over time, success rates of free flaps have approached 98%, allowing surgeons to shift their focus to minimizing morbidities associated with the donor sites. The radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, and fibula free flaps are the three most commonly used flaps in head and neck reconstruction, and therefore each of their advantages and associated morbidities are of particular interest. The present article aims to review the morbidities associated with each of the commonly used head and neck free flaps and techniques to minimize them that are described in the most recent literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

New techniques such as negative-pressure wound therapy, full thickness grafts, and rotational flaps have been developed recently that minimize these morbidities.

SUMMARY

The techniques described in the current review may improve long-term patient outcomes both esthetically and functionally.

[Rotation and advancement of the radial-based fasciocutaneous flap for primary closure of the radial forearm flap donor defect]

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and clinical application value of a new method for primary donor-site closure of radial forearm flaps with the use of rotation and advancement of radial-based fasciocutaneous flaps.

METHODS

The forearm donor-site defects of 36 patients were primarily closed by rotation and advancement of radial-based fasciocutaneous flaps after radial flap harvest from November 2014 to May 2015. Patients included 28 males and 8 females aged 28 to 67 years (53.6 years old on average). Flap size ranged from 3.0 cm×5.0 cm to 4.0 cm×6.0 cm. Wound healing, scar hyperplasia, and forearm appearance were recorded and evaluated. Wrist flexion angle, dorsal extension angle, ulnar deviation angle, and radial deviation angle were measured three and six months after the operation. Wrist joint loss index was calculated and compared with the preoperative index to evaluate wrist function recovery. The results were subjected to comparative t-
test to perform statistical analysis with SPSS 19.0 statistical software package.

RESULTS

Forearm donor sites were successfully closed without skin grafting in all patients. Skin ischemia caused by excessive tension was observed at the incision edge in five cases, thereby leading to skin exfoliation and pigment loss without affecting wound healing. All patients were followed up at six and twelve months, and presented a satisfactory appearance. No scar hyperplasia was observed. No significant difference was observed in radial deviation, ulnar deviation, palmar flexion, dorsiflexion, radial deflection angle, or wrist joint loss index (P>0.05) after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of rotation and advancement of radial-based fasciocutaneous flaps can directly close small-to-medium radial forearm flap donor defects. Satisfactory postoperative appearance can be achieved with no loss in wrist joint function. The novel method prove worthy of promotion and application in clinical work.

Oral and Oropharyngeal Reconstruction with a Free Flap

Extensive surgical resection of the aerodigestive track can result in a large and complex defect of the oropharynx, which represents a significant reconstructive challenge for the plastic surgery. Development of microsurgical techniques has allowed for free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects, with superior outcomes as well as decreases in postoperative complications. The reconstructive goals for oral and oropharyngeal defects are to restore the anatomy, to maintain continuity of the intraoral surface and oropharynx, to protect vital structures such as carotid arteries, to cover exposed portions of internal organs in preparation for adjuvant radiation, and to preserve complex functions of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Oral and oropharyngeal cancers should be treated with consideration of functional recovery. Multidisciplinary treatment strategies are necessary for maximizing disease control and preserving the natural form and function of the oropharynx.

Midfacial Reconstruction - A Systematic Review

AIM:

Different lesions affecting the midfacial regions require surgical reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the different methods used in midfacial reconstruction after maxillectomy procedures. The various reported surgical reconstructive techniques focusing on the esthetic and functional outcomes are to be reviewed in this article.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

A thorough PUBMED and hand-search of journals of relevance was performed on related terms and yielded 772 titles of which 45 abstracts were selected and obtained as full articles for further evaluation while the rest were excluded by title/abstract. According to the inclusion criteria; 14 of these studies were used to complete this article.

RESULTS:

In this review we showed that fibular and radial vascularized grafts were the most commonly reported methods in literature with a few other options. Computer aided design and surgical planning has been also reviewed and seems to be a rapidly evolving option for maxillofacial reconstruction. Lack of RCTs (randomized controlled trials) and large scale case series was noticed in this review making the evidence of poor quality.

CONCLUSION:

Methods of evaluation of reconstruction options mainly qualitative and subjective made the evaluation of the techniques in this review difficult.

Clinical application of decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane grafts for closing post-laryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistulas

Background and Objectives

Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common pathological type among the cancers of the larynx. Standard treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx is the combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and laryngectomy. Pharyngocutaneous fistula is a common complication of laryngectomy. We hypothesized that decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane can be an effective, non‐invasive method of treating pharyngocutaneous fistula.

Methods

A total of 67 patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed after treatment in a prospective trial. After preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and total or extended laryngectomy, primary wound healing occurred in 42 (62.7%) patients. Pharyngocutaneous fistula developed in 8 (11.9%) patients. Decellularized and lyophilized human amnion/chorion membrane grafts were used to reconstruct the fistulas.

Results

The average time for the full healing of the wound in all patients after transplantation of these grafts was 18 days.

Conclusion

The advantages of using these grafts over other existing methods of pharyngocutaneous fistula treatment are that they are non‐invasive, prevent donor morbidity, and enable management of the wound without using classical wound gauze. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:538–543. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.