Influence of third molars in mandibular fractures. Part 2: mandibular condyle-a meta-analysis

Assessment of relationships between condylar fracture pattern and mandibular third molar position by panoramic radiography and computed tomography: A retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Although previous studies have revealed the influence of the mandibular third molar (M3) on mandibular condylar fracture risk and that the presence of M3 could result in different incidences of condylar and angle fractures, there have been no analyses of the influence of M3 on fracture patterns. Moreover, evaluations of M3 position using panoramic radiography have shown insufficient accuracy. This study investigated the relationship between condylar fracture patterns and M3 position using panoramic radiography and computed tomography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 280 patients with unilateral mandibular condylar fractures and ipsilateral M3 admitted to West China Hospital of Stomatology between January 2016 and June 2022. Patient medical records, panoramic radiographs, and computed tomography images were collected. The vertical and horizontal positions of M3 were classified using the Pell and Gregory system. M3 angulation was defined as the angle between the long axis of M3 and the mandibular occlusal plane. Condylar fracture patterns were classified as intracapsular (Types A-C) or extracapsular (neck and base). Data were analyzed using McNemar-Bowker test, Pearson chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Classification of M3 position differed significantly between panoramic radiography and computed tomography images (p < .05). There was a significant association between the mandibular condylar fracture pattern and M3 horizontal position on computed tomography (p < .05). Class I M3 position on computed tomography was associated with a higher incidence of intracapsular than extracapsular fractures, along with a higher incidence of Type B than base fractures; the opposite relationships were observed for Class II. No such association was identified on panoramic radiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular condylar fracture patterns were presumably influenced by M3 horizontal position on computed tomography. The imaging modality affected the classification of M3 position and subsequent analyses. Computed tomography is recommended for future studies to improve accuracy and reliability.

Does the Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Increase the Risk of Angle Fracture to Prevent the Incidence of Condylar Fracture? - A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

This study aimed to retrospectively analyse the influence of the presence or absence of third molars and its position on the incidence of angle and condylar fractures of mandible.

Methodology

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 148 patients with mandibular fractures was done. A complete analysis of their clinical records and their radiological data was done. The primary predictor variable was the presence or absence of third molars and their positional status (Pell and Gregory's classification) if present. The outcome variable was the type of fracture and other predictor variables included age, gender and fracture aetiology. Data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Results

We observed that out of 48 patients with angle fractures, third molar was present in 67.34% and in 51.35% of 37 patients with condylar fractures, and there existed a positive correlation between the both. A significant association between the position of the teeth (Class II, III and Position B), angle fractures and (Class I, II, Position A) and condylar fractures was observed.

Conclusion

Angular fractures were associated with superficial and deep impactions and condylar fractures were associated with superficial impactions. No association was observed with the age, gender or mechanism of injury to the pattern of fractures. Impacted mandibular molars increase the risk of angle fracture, thereby preventing the force transmission to the condyle, and the absence or a fully erupted tooth increases the risk of condylar fractures.

Impacted lower third molar relationship with mandibular angle fracture complications

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular angle fractures are very common and are associated with the highest risk of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between impacted lower third molar and mandibular angle fracture complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients presenting with a mandibular angle fracture and at least 2 months follow up were retrospectively included. The following complications were recorded: post-traumatic malocclusion, mouth opening limitation, inferior alveolar nerve hypoesthesia, infection, delayed union, hardware loosening. The patients were divided in two groups: impacted lower third molar or erupted/absent lower third molar.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were included, lower third molar was impacted in 36 cases and erupted/absent in 32 cases. 40 complications were recorded in 27 patients at 2 months. No statistically significant difference could be found about malocclusion, mouth opening limitation and inferior alveolar nerve hypoesthesia. A lower rate of persistent inferior alveolar nerve hypoesthesia (p = 0.0557) in patients with impacted lower third molar (19.4%) was observed compared to patients without impacted lower third molar (40.6%). There was no occurrence of delayed union and hardware loosening in impacted lower third molar group, whereas 5 delayed unions and 4 hardware loosening were recorded in erupted/absent lower third molar group. Finally, the rate of patients with at least one of the 6 complications is significantly higher in the erupted/absent lower third molar group (17/32, 53.1%) than in the impacted lower third molar group (10/36, 27.8%), p = 0.033.

DISCUSSION

The risk of overall complication is decreased when lower third molar is impacted in mandibular angle fracture. This supports the idea of a role of the impacted lower third molar in fracture reduction and stability.

The influence of wisdom tooth impaction and occlusal support on mandibular angle and condyle fractures

This study aimed to analyze the relationship of the occlusal support together with the lower third molars to the mandibular fractures of the angle and condyle among patients in our medical institutions. This was a retrospective study that reviewed the medical records and radiographs of all patients treated for mandibular fractures from 2015 to 2019. The data collected by using picture archiving and communicating system. Only records with mandibular angle or condyle fractures were included. The dependent variable was the presence of the fractures of the mandibular angle or condyle. The independent variables were epidemiological data, third molar characteristics, existence or absence of occlusal support. The data was analyzed through Univariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression. From a total of 187 mandibular fractures, 44 presented mandibular angle fracture and 29 shown condyle fractures. The average age was 40.34 ± 13.47 years. The absence of occlusal support increased the chance of condyle fractures by 5.1 times (95% CI 1.61-17.29). The lack of occlusal support is more associated with condyle fractures than the presence of occlusal support, regardless of third molar presence and characteristics and other variables evaluated.

Association Between Third Molar Impaction Status and Angle or Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the correlations between mandibular third molar impaction status and mandibular angle and condylar fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients with unilateral and isolated angle or condylar fractures. Patient records and panoramic radiographs were evaluated. The predictor variables included the presence, impaction status (Pell and Gregory [P&G] classification), and angulation (Winter classification) of the third molar. The outcome variable was the type of fracture, whereas other predictor variables included demographic factors such as age, gender, and fracture etiology. Bivariate (χ² test) and logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the associations between variables and the outcome.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 164 angle fracture (mean age, 31.6 ± 12.3 years; 83.5% male) and 115 condylar fracture (mean age, 41.9 ± 16.8 years; 76.5% male) patients. A third molar was present in 72.6% of the angle fracture group and 54.8% of the condylar fracture group (P = .002). Deep impactions (classes IC, IIC, IIIB, and IIIC) exhibited an odds ratio (OR) of 3.60 for angle fractures (P < .001). No association was found between tooth angulations and the type of fracture. According to logistic regression analysis, older age (adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.07), P&G class I impaction (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.20), and P&G class A impaction (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.24) were significantly associated with condylar fractures whereas the presence of a third molar (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.76) or P&G class B impaction (OR, 0.287; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.69) was associated with angular fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

P&G class II or III and class B impaction status was significantly associated with angle fractures, whereas missing or fully erupted (class IA) third molars significantly correlated with condylar fractures.

Impacted Mandibular Third Molars and Their Influence on Mandibular Angle and Condyle Fractures

The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the effect unerupted or partially erupted third molars have on the angle and condyle fracture patterns of the mandible. It also focuses on evaluating the type of impaction that causes angle fracture and the level at which the condyle most commonly fractures. The study involves all the patients who had undergone treatment for condylar and angle of the mandible fractures from 2010 to 2017 in our craniofacial center. The case records and orthopantomograms of each patient were taken into consideration and a correlation was established based on gender, age, etiology, presence of third molars, position of third molars, angulation, and root development of third molars. Of the 150 angle fracture patients, 146 had third molars and 4 did not, whereas of the 130 condyle fractures, third molar was present in 54 patients and absent in 76. The prevalence of angle fractures was statistically significant when a third molar was present, whereas the prevalence of condyle fractures was higher when third molar was absent. The results of age, etiology, angulation, position, and root development of third molars were also statistically significant. However, sex of the patient did not influence the fracture pattern. The presence of an impacted third molar or a completely erupted one has a definite influence on the fracture pattern of the mandible. The occurrence of angle and condyle fractures was mostly affected by the continuity of the cortical bone at the angle of the mandible. Hence, prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars does increase the risk of condyle fractures.

Association between mandibular third molar position and the occurrence of pericoronitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between mandibular third molar position and occurrence of pericoronitis.

DESIGN

The systematic review was performed based on PRISMA criteria (Prospero: CRD42018102835). The electronic search was performed in Medline, Virtual Health Library and Web of Science (until August 2018), without language restriction. Two researchers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed methodologic quality. Twenty-one articles were included in the review, comprising 6895 patients, with 1913 third mandibular molars being affected by pericoronitis. Ten studies were incuded in meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The third molar in vertical position of Winter is the one with the greatest chance of presenting pericoronitis, compared to the other positions, while the horizontal position decreases this chance. There was no significant difference in the chance of pericoronitis between positions I and II of Pell & Gregory (OR: 0.29; IC: 0.07-1.23, I² = 88%). Third molars classified in position A had greater chance of pericoronitis when compared to those in position B (OR: 7.13; IC: 1.31-38.74, I² = 93%). The vertical position of the lower third molar is more associated with the occurrence of pericoronitis when compared to the other positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertical position of the lower third molar is more associated with the occurrence of pericoronitis when compared to the other Winter' positions. Considering Pell and Gregory positions, position A had a greater chance of pericoronitis compared to position B. The prophylactic removal of lower third semi-erupted vertical molar or in position A is indicated to prevent pericoronitis.