Implant-oriented navigation in orbital reconstruction. Part 1: technique and accuracy study

A novel portable augmented reality surgical navigation system for maxillofacial surgery: technique and accuracy study

Surgical navigation, despite its potential benefits, faces challenges in widespread adoption in clinical practice. Possible reasons include the high cost, increased surgery time, attention shifts during surgery, and the mental task of mapping from the monitor to the patient. To address these challenges, a portable, all-in-one surgical navigation system using augmented reality (AR) was developed, and its feasibility and accuracy were investigated. The system achieves AR visualization by capturing a live video stream of the actual surgical field using a visible light camera and merging it with preoperative virtual images. A skull model with reference spheres was used to evaluate the accuracy. After registration, virtual models were overlaid on the real skull model. The discrepancies between the centres of the real spheres and the virtual model were measured to assess the AR visualization accuracy. This AR surgical navigation system demonstrated precise AR visualization, with an overall overlap error of 0.53 ± 0.21 mm. By seamlessly integrating the preoperative virtual plan with the intraoperative field of view in a single view, this novel AR navigation system could provide a feasible solution for the use of AR visualization to guide the surgeon in performing the operation as planned.

Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Dentistry: Highlights from the Current Research

Many modern advancements have taken place in dentistry that have exponentially impacted the progress and practice of dentistry. Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are becoming the trend in the practice of modern dentistry because of their impact on changing the patient’s experience. The use of AR and VR has been beneficial in different fields of science, but their use in dentistry is yet to be thoroughly explored, and conventional ways of dentistry are still practiced at large. Over the past few years, dental treatment has been significantly reshaped by technological advancements. In dentistry, the use of AR and VR systems has not become widespread, but their different uses should be explored. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide an update on the contemporary knowledge, to report on the ongoing progress of AR and VR in various fields of dental medicine and education, and to identify the further research required to achieve their translation into clinical practice. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles in peer-reviewed English-language journals published in the last 10 years up to 31 March 2021, with the help of specific keywords related to AR and VR in various dental fields. Of the total of 101 articles found in the literature search, 68 abstracts were considered suitable and further evaluated, and consequently, 33 full-texts were identified. Finally, a total of 13 full-texts were excluded from further analysis, resulting in 20 articles for final inclusion. The overall number of studies included in this review was low; thus, at this point in time, scientifically-proven recommendations could not be stated. AR and VR have been found to be beneficial tools for clinical practice and for enhancing the learning experiences of students during their pre-clinical education and training sessions. Clinicians can use VR technology to show their patients the expected outcomes before the undergo dental procedures. Additionally, AR and VR can be implemented to overcome dental phobia, which is commonly experienced by pediatric patients. Future studies should focus on forming technological standards with high-quality data and developing scientifically-proven AR/VR gadgets for dental practice.

A Stepwise Guide to Freehand Bending of Orbital Floor Mesh

Orbital fractures can often result in enophthalmos or diplopia. Orbital reconstruction with titanium meshes is the current treatment modality. Adapting the titanium orbital floor mesh is often challenging due to the complex anatomy of the orbital floor. Here, a stepwise free hand bending technique of a titanium orbital floor mesh is described. The bending can be done preoperatively, and mesh fit can be checked against a dry anatomical skull before sterilization. The methodical approach to free hand bending of titanium orbital floor mesh minimizes the intraoperative adjustments and permits quick orbital reconstruction. Trainees and less-experienced surgeons can benefit from the methodical approach to free hand bending of titanium orbital floor mesh.

Digital planning and individual implants for secondary reconstruction of midfacial deformities: A pilot study

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of implementing three‐dimensional virtual surgical planning (VSP) and subsequent transfer by additive manufactured tools in the secondary reconstruction of residual post‐traumatic deformities in the midface.

Methods

Patients after secondary reconstruction of post‐traumatic midfacial deformities were included in this case series. The metrical deviation between the virtually planned and postoperative position of patient‐specific implants (PSI) and bone segments was measured at corresponding reference points. Further information collected included demographic data, post‐traumatic symptoms, and type of transfer tools.

Results

Eight consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. In five patients, VSP with subsequent manufacturing of combined predrilling/osteotomy guides and PSI was performed. In three patients, osteotomy guides, repositioning guides, and individually prebent plates were used following VSP. The median distances between the virtually planned and the postoperative position of the PSI were 2.01 mm (n = 18) compared to a median distance concerning the bone segments of 3.05 mm (n = 12). In patients where PSI were used, the median displacement of the bone segments was lower (n = 7, median 2.77 mm) than in the group with prebent plates (n = 5, 3.28 mm).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the feasibility of VSP and transfer by additive manufactured tools for the secondary reconstruction of complex residual post‐traumatic deformities in the midface. However, the median deviations observed in this case series were unexpectedly high. The use of navigational systems may further improve the level of accuracy.

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of implementing three‐dimensional virtual surgical planning (VSP) and subsequent transfer by additive manufactured tools in the secondary reconstruction of residual post‐traumatic deformities in the midface. This study demonstrated the feasibility of VSP and transfer by additive manufactured tools for the secondary reconstruction of complex residual post‐traumatic deformities in the midface. However, the median deviations observed in this case series were unexpectedly high. The use of navigational systems may further improve the level of accuracy.

Accuracy of free-hand positioned patient specific implants (PSI) in primary reconstruction after inferior and/or medial orbital wall fractures

BACKGROUND

To assess the accuracy with which CAD/CAM-fabricated patient-specific titanium implants (PSI) are positioned for inferior and/or medial orbital wall reconstruction without the use of intraoperative navigation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a primary reconstruction of the orbital walls with PSI due to fractures were enrolled in this retrospective cohort analysis. The primary outcome variables were the mean surface distances (MSD) between virtually planned and postoperative PSI position and single linear deviations in the x-, y- and z-axis at corresponding reference points. Secondary outcome variables included demographic data, classification of orbital wall defects and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 33 PSI (orbital floor n = 22; medial wall, n = 11) were examined in 27 patients. MSD was on a comparable level for the orbital floor and medial wall (median 0.39 mm, range 0.22-1.53 mm vs. median 0.42 mm, range 0.21-0.98 mm; p = 0.56). Single linear deviations were lower for reconstructions of the orbital floor compared to the medial wall (median 0.45 vs. 0.79 mm; p < 0.05). There was no association between the occurrence of diplopia and the accuracy level (p = 0.418).

CONCLUSIONS

Free-hand positioning of PSI reaches a clinically appropriate level of accuracy, limiting the necessity of navigational systems to selected cases.

A review on patient-specific facial and cranial implant design using Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques

INTRODUCTION

Researchers and engineers have found their importance in healthcare industry including recent updates in patient-specific implant (PSI) design. CAD/CAM technology plays an important role in the design and development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) based implants.The across the globe have their interest focused on the design and manufacturing of AI-based implants in everyday professional use can decrease the cost, improve patient's health and increase efficiency, and thus many implant designers and manufacturers practice.

AREAS COVERED

The focus of this study has been to manufacture smart devices that can make contact with the world as normal people do, understand their language, and learn to improve from real-life examples. Machine learning can be guided using a heavy amount of data sets and algorithms that can improve its ability to learn to perform the task. In this review, artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, and machine-learning techniques are studied in the design of biomedical implants.

EXPERT OPINION

The main purpose of this article was to highlight important AI techniques to design PSIs. These are the automatic techniques to help designers to design patient-specific implants using AI algorithms such as deep learning, machine learning, and some other automatic methods.

Quantitative Augmented Reality-Assisted Free-Hand Orthognathic Surgery Using Electromagnetic Tracking and Skin-Attached Dynamic Reference

The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative AR-assisted free-hand orthognathic surgery method using electromagnetic (EM) tracking and skin-attached dynamic reference. The authors proposed a novel, simplified, and convenient workflow for augmented reality (AR)-assisted orthognathic surgery based on optical marker-less tracking, a comfortable display, and a non-invasive, skin-attached dynamic reference frame. The 2 registrations between the physical (EM tracking) and CT image spaces and between the physical and AR camera spaces, essential processes in AR-assisted surgery, were pre-operatively performed using the registration body complex and 3D depth camera. The intraoperative model of the maxillary bone segment (MBS) was superimposed on the real patient image with the simulated goal model on a flat-panel display, and the MBS was freely handled for repositioning with respect to the skin-attached dynamic reference tool (SRT) with quantitative visualization of landmarks of interest using only EM tracking. To evaluate the accuracy of AR-assisted Le Fort I surgery, the MBS of the phantom was simulated and repositioned by 6 translational and three rotational movements. The mean absolute deviations (MADs) between the simulation and post-operative positions of MBS landmarks by the SRT were 0.20, 0.34, 0.29, and 0.55 mm in x- (left lateral, right lateral), y- (setback, advance), and z- (impaction, elongation) directions, and RMS, respectively, while those by the BRT were 0.23, 0.37, 0.30, and 0.60 mm. There were no significant differences between the translation and rotation surgeries or among surgeries in the x-, y-, and z-axes for the SRT. The MADs in the x-, y-, and z-axes exhibited no significant differences between the SRT and BRT. The developed method showed high accuracy and reliability in free-hand orthognathic surgery using EM tracking and skin-attached dynamic reference.

[Use of navigation in skull base surgery]

The review briefly presents the history of development of navigation systems in neurosurgery. The idea of the existing principles underlying the navigation systems used in neurosurgery is given. Currently, the basic principles of navigation are optical and electromagnetic. Studies are presented comparing the accuracy of various navigation systems. Optical navigation demonstrates greater accuracy compared to electromagnetic, but both methods demonstrate a submillimeter error in the experiment. The history of use of navigation in the surgery of the skull base is analyzed in detail, the most relevant areas of use of navigation within the surgery of the skull base are considered: craniofacial reconstruction, endoscopic endonasal surgery, surgery of common tumors of the skull base affecting the infratemporal, pterygopalatine fossa, temporomandibular joint. Indications for the use of navigation, limitations of the methodology are explained.

Implant-oriented navigation in orbital reconstruction part II: preclinical cadaver study

In orbital reconstruction, the acquired position of an orbital implant can be evaluated with the aid of intraoperative navigation. Feedback of the navigation system is only obtained after positioning of the implant: the implant's position is not tracked in real time during positioning. The surgeon has to interpret the navigation feedback and translate it to desired adjustments of the implant's position. In a previous study, a real-time implant-oriented navigation approach was introduced and the system's accuracy was evaluated. In this study, this real-time navigation approach was compared to a marker-based navigation approach in a preclinical set-up. Ten cadavers (20 orbital defects) were reconstructed twice, by two surgeons (total: 80 reconstructions). Implant positioning was significantly improved in the real-time implant-oriented approach in terms of roll (2.0° vs. 3.2°, P=0.03), yaw (2.2° vs. 3.4°, P=0.01) and translation (1.3mm vs. 1.8mm, P=0.005). Duration of the real-time navigation procedure was reduced (median 4.5 min vs. 7.5 min). Subjective appreciation of the navigation technique was higher for real-time implant-oriented navigation (mean 7.5 vs. 9.0). Real-time implant-oriented navigation feedback provides real-time, intuitive feedback to the surgeon, which leads to improved implant positioning and shortens duration of the navigation procedure.

Current state of the art in the use of augmented reality in dentistry: a systematic review of the literature

Background

The aim of the present systematic review was to screen the literature and to describe current applications of augmented reality.

Materials and methods

The protocol design was structured according to PRISMA-P guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. A review of the following databases was carried out: Medline, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and the Gray literature. Data was extracted, summarized and collected for qualitative analysis and evaluated for individual risk of bias (R.O.B.) assessment, by two independent examiners. Collected data included: year of publishing, journal with reviewing system and impact factor, study design, sample size, target of the study, hardware(s) and software(s) used or custom developed, primary outcomes, field of interest and quantification of the displacement error and timing measurements, when available. Qualitative evidence synthesis refers to SPIDER.

Results

From a primary research of 17,652 articles, 33 were considered in the review for qualitative synthesis. 16 among selected articles were eligible for quantitative synthesis of heterogenous data, 12 out of 13 judged the precision at least as acceptable, while 3 out of 6 described an increase in operation timing of about 1 h. 60% (n = 20) of selected studies refers to a camera-display augmented reality system while 21% (n = 7) refers to a head-mounted system. The software proposed in the articles were self-developed by 7 authors while the majority proposed commercially available ones. The applications proposed for augmented reality are: Oral and maxillo-facial surgery (OMS) in 21 studies, restorative dentistry in 5 studies, educational purposes in 4 studies and orthodontics in 1 study. The majority of the studies were carried on phantoms (51%) and those on patients were 11 (33%).

Conclusions

On the base of literature the current development is still insufficient for full validation process, however independent sources of customized software for augmented reality seems promising to help routinely procedures, complicate or specific interventions, education and learning. Oral and maxillofacial area is predominant, the results in precision are promising, while timing is still very controversial since some authors describe longer preparation time when using augmented reality up to 60 min while others describe a reduced operating time of 50/100%.

Trial registration

The following systematic review was registered in PROSPERO with RN: CRD42019120058.

Toward Holographic-Guided Surgery

The implementation of augmented reality (AR) in image-guided surgery (IGS) can improve surgical interventions by presenting the image data directly on the patient at the correct position and in the actual orientation. This approach can resolve the switching focus problem, which occurs in conventional IGS systems when the surgeon has to look away from the operation field to consult the image data on a 2-dimensional screen. The Microsoft HoloLens, a head-mounted AR display, was combined with an optical navigation system to create an AR-based IGS system. Experiments were performed on a phantom model to determine the accuracy of the complete system and to evaluate the effect of adding AR. The results demonstrated a mean Euclidean distance of 2.3 mm with a maximum error of 3.5 mm for the complete system. Adding AR visualization to a conventional system increased the mean error by 1.6 mm. The introduction of AR in IGS was promising. The presented system provided a solution for the switching focus problem and created a more intuitive guidance system. With a further reduction in the error and more research to optimize the visualization, many surgical applications could benefit from the advantages of AR guidance.