The use of Medpor implants for midface contouring in cleft patients

Morphological Measurement of Asian Osteal Nasal Base for Paranasal Augmentation

BACKGROUND

Paranasal augmentation has been a popular approach in restoring Asian patients' lateral profile. Irregular surface in the surgical area emphasizes the importance of morphological evidence for the preoperative evaluation and the design of paranasal implants.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected craniofacial computer tomography scans of patients in the department of plastic surgery from 2020 to 2022. The imaging data were imported to Mimics (version 20.0; Materialize, Leuven, Belgium) for three-dimensional reconstruction. Measurements of osteal nasal base were performed in 3-matics (version 12.0; Materialize). The severity of paranasal concavity was graded by a senior doctor to study the correlation with measured variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with a median age of 27 years (IQR: 22-33) were included in the study. For design of paranasal implants, the lengths of both lower and lateral edge were measured for reference. In the regression analysis, the alar base-alveolar process angle was significantly associated with the degrees of paranasal concavity (OR = 1.222, p = 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Morphological data of osteal nasal base were measured and presented in the current study. The analysis supported that alar base-alveolar process angle be used for preoperative grading and evaluation to help guiding treatment decisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Tunneled Paranasal Augmentation Using Diced Autologous Costal Cartilage in Asian Rhinoplasty: A Comparative Study

Due to the prevalence of anterior maxilla dysplasia in Asian population, paranasal concavity is a common accompaniment to low nose, but its impact on facial harmonization is often underestimated. A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients diagnosed as low nose with paranasal concavity between June 2017 and June 2021, with a total of 56 patients followed up successfully. The control and observation groups were established according to whether the paranasal augmentation was performed. Demographic data were collected. Cosmetic enhancement was quantitatively evaluated by sagittal planimetry, establishing related anatomical landmarks and measuring columella base prominence (CBP) and alar base prominence (ABP). Subjective evaluation concluded the patient-reported satisfaction (FACE-Q-Rhinoplasty Module and Facial Appearance Module) and the third-party physician assessment (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, GAIS).Significant improvements in CBP and ABP were reported both in the control and the observation group (p < 0.01). In postoperative intergroup comparisons, the observation group was superior to the control group regarding ABP values (2.5 ± 0.75 degrees, p < 0.01), FACE-Q-Facial scores (7.49 ± 3.70, p < 0.05), and GAIS scores (p < 0.05). However, no statistical difference was found in CBP values and FACE-Q-Rhinoplasty scores. Paranasal augmentation-related complications included asymmetry of alar bases (6.9%) and facial or intraoral foreign body sensation (34.5%). This study affirmed that paranasal augmentation using diced costal cartilage in rhinoplasty is a safe procedure effective in remedying paranasal concavity and improving facial satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE::  IV.

The Treatment of Alar Base Depression in Rhinoplasty with Diced Autologous Cartilage or Mass Cartilage: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Alar base is the basal part where the two sides of the nose and the upper lip are connected. Alar base depression affects the overall facial contour by making the nasolabial folds deepen, the nasolabial angle smaller, the center of the face flat, etc. Despite the rapid development of rhinoplasty, controversy still exists regarding the treatment of alar base depression. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two prevalent techniques-diced autologous cartilage and mass cartilage-for addressing alar base depression.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by searching the literature published in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, Cochrane from January 2000 to April 2023 with the key words 'alar base depression or depressed alar base' and 'alar base augmentation,' and 2 investigators independently screened the retrieved literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 269 articles were obtained through database search. After removing duplicates, reading titles and abstracts, and finally reviewing the full text, 6 articles were included in the final study, including 165 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that both diced autologous cartilage and mass cartilage techniques exhibit favorable outcomes in correcting alar base depression. Diced autologous cartilage offers better malleability, lighter border contours, and a more natural appearance. On the other hand, diced autologous cartilage seems to offer superior long-term effects, while mass cartilage presents certain surgical procedural advantages. Also, compared to diced cartilage, mass cartilage may have a lower rate of long-term resorption and a lower risk of displacement. This review emphasizes the need for personalized treatment selection based on individual patient characteristics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266 .

Prevalence of complications associated with polymer-based alloplastic materials in nasal dorsal augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Various techniques with different grafts and implants have been proposed to establish a smooth and symmetric nasal dorsum with adequate function. Broadly, two categories of materials have been used in this regard: alloplastic implant materials and autograft materials. The aim of these meta-analyses is to explore the incidence of complications after dorsum augmentation surgery using alloplastic materials.

Materials and methods

After duplication removal 491 papers remained that title and abstract were assessed for eligibility. Regarding the study type, 27 observational studies were included, 21 retrospective and 6 prospective case series. A total of 3803 cases were enrolled in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Result

Twenty-seven articles reported on complications and outcomes of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty with synthetic materials. In a random-effects model, the weighted mean percentage was 2.75% (95% CI 1.61 to 4.17%). the weighted mean percentage were 1.91% (95% CI 0.77 to 3.54%), 0.72% (95% CI 0.316 to 1.31%), and 0.78% (95% CI 0.43 to 1.24%) respectively.

Conclusion

The widely used alloplasts were expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), high-density polyethylene, and silicone. The total rates for complications, infection, deviation, irregularity, hematoma, extrusion, and overcorrection were 2.75%, 1.91%, 0.72%, 0.70%, 0.78%, and 0.49%, respectively. The revision rate, based on the random effects model, was 6.40% with 95%CI (3.84 to 9.57).

Trial registration

This meta-analysis was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number CRD42020209644).

Patient-Specific Implants (PSI) in Maxillary Hypoplasia Secondary to Cleft Lip and Palate Deformity

Maxillary hypoplasia is often evident in cleft patients due to impaired growth and dense scarring from previous cleft surgeries. For these patients, treatment scenario has taken many turns over ages, evolved from orthognathic correction to distraction osteogenesis, with mixed prognosis and outcome depending on severity of the case and other several factors. We are reporting a case of 24-year-old female with maxillary hypoplasia secondary to bilateral cleft lip and palate with hypoplastic prolabium, who has been treated with two patient-specific implants in bilateral maxillary region for facial profile enhancement.

Achieving the Optimal Aesthetic Benefit While Correcting Midface Deficiency: Utilizing A High Winged Le Fort I in Cleft and Craniofacial Patients

ABSTRACT

Craniofacial anomalies are congenital disorders that affect the cranium and facial bones, with cleft lip and palate being the most common. These anomalies are often associated with abnormal development of pharyngeal arches and can result in the development of class III malocclusion and severe maxillary retrusion. Current treatment includes orthodontic decompensation and Le Fort I osteotomy to correct the maxillomandibular relationship. However, the traditional Le Fort I (LFI) advancement does not fully address the lack of skeletal volume in the midface. The high winged Le Fort I osteotomy (HWLFI) is an excellent surgical option for simultaneous correction of the midface deficiency and malocclusion while restoring optimal esthetic convexity. A retrospective chart review was conducted to include all cleft and craniofacial patients who underwent HWLFI advancement from 2002 to 2018. Patients had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Patient data and complications were reviewed. Standardized facial photographs were analyzed for esthetic improvement, occlusion, and beneficial salutary effects on the midface. Forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 18.9 years. The mean follow-up was 32 months. Early complications included infection (9.3%) and temporary nerve paresthesia (2.3%). Late complications included infection (6.5%), wound dehiscence (4.3%), and painful hardware (2.3%). One patient (2.3 percent) had clinically significant relapse that required surgery. Postoperatively, patients demonstrated excellent midface projection and correction of the skeletal malocclusion. The HWLFI advancement significantly improves both the malocclusion and esthetic concerns of cleft and craniofacial patients by reestablishing maximal midfacial support. Important advantages of the HWLFI are avoidance of alloplastic implant use and extensive and potentially unstable surgical procedures that increase orbital volume.

TNF-α-Inhibition Improves the Biocompatibility of Porous Polyethylene Implants In Vivo

Background:

To improve the biocompatibility of porous polyethylene (PPE) implants and expand their application range for reconstructive surgery in poorly vascularized environments, implants were coated with tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor Etanercept. While approved for systemic application, local application of the drug is a novel experimental approach. Microvascular and mechanical integration as well as parameters of inflammation were analyzed in vivo.

Methods:

PPE implants were coated with Etanercept and extracellular matrix (ECM) components prior to implantation into dorsal skinfold chambers of C57BL/6 mice. Fluorescence microscopy analyses of angiogenesis and local inflammatory response were thrice performed in vivo over a period of 14 days to assess tissue integration and biocompatibility. Uncoated implants and ECM-coated implants served as controls.

Results:

TNFα inhibition with Etanercept led to a reduced local inflammatory response: leukocyte-endothelial cell adherence was significantly lowered compared to both control groups (n = 6/group) on days 3 and 14, where the lowest values were reached: 3573.88 leukocytes/mm-2 ± 880.16 (uncoated implants) vs. 3939.09 mm-2 ± 623.34 (Matrigel only) vs. 637.98 mm-2 + 176.85 (Matrigel and Etanercept). Implant-coating with Matrigel alone and Matrigel and Etanercept led to significantly higher vessel densities 7 and 14 days vs. 3 days after implantation and compared to uncoated implants. Mechanical implant integration as measured by dynamic breaking strength did not differ after 14 days.

Conclusion:

Our data show a reduced local inflammatory response to PPE implants after immunomodulatory coating with Etanercept in vivo, suggesting improved biocompatibility. Application of this tissue engineering approach is therefore warranted in models of a compromised host environment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13770-020-00325-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Outcomes and complications associated with malar onlays: literature review and case series of 119 implants

Alloplastic malar onlays have been used by surgeons to correct or enhance the midfacial skeleton for over 40 years. Case series have shown respectable results using different alloplastic materials in various maxillofacial subsites. However, these articles include small numbers of patients with limited follow up. We present a literature review specifically concentrating on porous polyethylene (Medpor, Stryker) and polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) malar onlays. We illustrate the technique used by a single oral and maxillofacial surgeon for placement of 119 implants in 61 patients over a 14-year period, and show the results of this work with long-term follow up. A complication rate of 2.5% in this cohort was reported, with follow up of three years, demonstrating that this technique for midfacial correction is successful in both the short and the long term.

Influence of different techniques of secondary cleft lip revision surgery on upper lip projection

Patient dissatisfaction with labial appearance in the adult cleft lip is frequently linked to poor upper lip projection. Other areas of concern include asymmetry and impaired upper lip height. Different surgical techniques are available to address volumetric deficiencies, according to extent and localization. However, data comparing outcomes in these different areas are limited. The main aim of this study was to assess the relative gains in upper lip projection. An evaluation of upper vermilion height and symmetry was also performed. Thirty-seven consecutive patients treated by a single surgeon had their pre- and postoperative results measured using standardized photographs; these were analysed using subjective and objective outcome measures. Seven examiners evaluated anonymized pre- and postoperative side and front views for subjective evaluation. The objective analysis was performed using Adobe Photoshop. Fifteen lip revisions, four Abbe flaps, 12 dermal grafts, and six PermaLip implants were performed. In bilateral cleft lip and palate patients, Abbe flaps showed the most significant improvement in labial projection, followed by PermaLip implants and dermal grafts. In unilateral cleft lip and palate patients, PermaLip implants best addressed impaired lip projection, followed by dermal grafts. Overall, functional lip revisions showed excellent outcomes for upper lip symmetry; however, only minor changes in labial projection were found.