Patterns of lingual split and lateral bone cut end and their associations with neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy

Evaluation of the Lingual Splitting Patterns and the Lateral Bone Cut Ends Following Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most popular orthognathic procedure performed by maxillofacial surgeons to treat skeletal class II and class III and to correct mandibular asymmetries. The study aimed to evaluate the lingual splitting patterns and lateral bone cut end (LBCE) in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and their relation with the ramal thickness and the presence of impacted third molars using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). This prospective observational study included patients with mandibular prognathism who were treated with BSSO with or without Le Fort I osteotomy. Cone beam computed tomography was used to measure the ramal thickness preoperatively and to evaluate the LBCE, and the lingual splitting patterns postoperatively. Twenty-one patients (42 sides) were included in this study. The most commonly observed lingual splitting pattern was type III (47.6%), while the most common LBCE was type B (59.5%). The bad split was encountered 8 times on 42 sides (16.7%). A nonsignificant relationship between the ramal thickness and bad splitting was observed ( P =0.901). Impacted third molars were present in 16 of the 42 sides (38.1%) and had no significant effect on the occurrence of bad splitting ( P =0.063). Type III lingual splitting pattern and type B LBCE were the most commonly observed patterns. No direct association was observed concerning the presence of impacted mandibular third molars and the thickness of the ramus with the occurrence of bad splitting.

The effect of lateral bone cut end on the patterns of the lingual split during BSSO in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion

This study examines the effect of the lateral bone cut end (LBCE) on the pattern of lingual split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion. A case-control study according to the pattern of the sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) lingual split line was conducted in patients who underwent BSSO. The primary predictor variable was the ratio of the LBCE. The primary outcome variable was the type of lingual fracture line classified according to the lingual split scale (LSS). Other variables included patients' weight, sex, age, left and right sides of the mandible, and experience of the surgeon. Logistic regression analysis or the chi-squared test was performed to determine the effect of these variables on various types of lingual fracture line. The significance level was 95% (p < 0.05). There were 271 patients enrolled in this study. The SSO lingual split lines were divided into LSS1 (329/542), LSS2 (82/542), LSS3 (93/542), and LSS4 (38/542) splits. Logistic regression analysis showed that the LSS3 split was more likely to appear when the LBCE was closer to the lingual side (p = 0.0017). The age of patients significantly affected the possibilities of LSS2 (p = 0.0008) and LSS3 (p = 0.0023) splits. A LBCE close to the lingual side was an inducer for the formation of a LSS3 split in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion during BSSO. The age of the patient also affected the possibility of LSS2 and LSS3 splits.

Influence of lingual plate fracture pattern on remodelling site during the healing process of sagittal split ramus osteotomy

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether differences in the pattern of the lingual plate split in sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) affect the remodelling of the split site. Sixty-one patients with mandibular prognathism (122 sides) underwent SSRO. Computed tomography (CT) was performed at 1 week and 1 year after SSRO. Bone splits were classified according to the lingual split scale (LSS) and the lateral bone cut end (LBCE) by evaluating CT images at 1 week. The remodelling at the split sites was evaluated by superimposing the CT images obtained at 1 week and 1 year. Regarding the LSS pattern, significant differences were observed in the distance between anteroposterior ramus points (P = 0.033) and the ramus area in the axial image (P = 0.011). The LBCE pattern also showed a significant difference in the distance between anteroposterior ramus points (P = 0.043). In conclusion, the differences in the lingual plate split and ramus cut end of the SSRO influence the postoperative remodelling in the anteroposterior region of the split site.

Computed tomography assessment of mandibular morphologic changes and the inferior mandibular border defect after sagittal split ramus osteotomy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess mandibular morphologic changes to the condyle, ramus, mandibular body, and inferior mandibular border defect after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in class II and III patients.

STUDY DESIGN

The relationships among the condyle, ramus, and mandibular body measured by computed tomography preoperatively and postoperatively were assessed and factors related to the reduction of the condylar square and mandibular inferior border defect were examined.

RESULTS

Patients included 72 female patients with jaw deformity (36 skeletal class II cases, 36 skeletal class III cases). Postoperative reduction of the condylar square was significantly correlated with preoperative condylar height in patients with class II (P = .0297) vs preoperative condylar height and preoperative mandibular height in patients with class III (P < .0001). A mandibular inferior border defect was found in 18 of 72 class II sides (25.0%) and was significantly related to the position of the osteotomy line and attachment side of the inferior border cortex (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study's findings suggest that the postoperative reduction of the condyle could be associated with preoperative condylar height. However, the mandibular inferior border defect in class II advancement surgery could be independently associated with technical factors in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.