Antibiotic prophylaxis of infective endocarditis in oral and maxillofacial surgery: incomplete implementation of guidelines in everyday clinical practice

Indications for Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Dentoalveolar Procedures

Antibiotic prophylaxis is the use of antibiotics perioperatively to prevent infections at the surgical site or distant locations. The decision to provide prophylaxis must balance risks of antibiotic resistance, adverse drug reactions, and increased health care costs with the benefit of decreasing infection. This determination has been studied extensively in patients with specific cardiac conditions and prosthetic joints. Prophylactic antibiotics in healthy patients have been shown to reduce the frequency of alveolar osteitis and decrease the failure rates of dental implants.

The patient with congenital heart disease in ambulatory surgery

The number of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) undergoing ambulatory surgery is increasing. Deciding whether a CHD patient is suitable for an ambulatory procedure is still challenging. Several factors must be considered, including the type of planned procedure, the complexity of the underlying pathology, the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status classification of the patient, and other patient-specific factors, including comorbidity, chronic complications of CHD, medication, coagulation disorders, and issues related to the presence of a pacemaker (PM) or cardioverter-defibrillator. Numerous studies reported higher perioperative mortality and morbidity rates in surgical patients with CHD than non-CHD patients. However, most of these studies were conducted in a cohort of hospitalized patients and may not reflect the ambulatory setting. The current review aims to provide the anesthesiologist with an overview and practical recommendations on selecting and managing a CHD patient scheduled for an ambulatory procedure.

The Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Infective Endocarditis: A Multicentric Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: Multidrug-resistant microorganisms have made treating bacterial infections challenging. Resistance to antibiotics is expected to overcome efforts to produce new, effective antibacterial medication that is lifesaving in many situations. Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infection that affects 5–15 per 100,000 patients annually and requires rapid antibiotic therapy to prevent morbidity and mortality. Materials and Methods: The present research assessed IE cases over five years, from a multicentric database, with the main objective of determining the degree of antibiotic resistance in these patients, stratified by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Results: Bad oral hygiene was present in 58.6% of patients from the Gram-negative group (vs. 38.7% in the Gram-positive group). Non-valvular heart disease was identified in approximately 40% of all patients, and valvopathies in approximately 20%. It was observed that 37.9% of Gram-negative IE bacteria were resistant to three or more antibiotics, whereas 20.7% were susceptible. Among Gram-positive infections, S. aureus was the most commonly involved pathogen, with a multidrug-resistant pattern in 11.2% of patients, while Acinetobacter baumannii had the highest resistance pattern of all Gram-negative pathogens, with 27.4% of all samples resistant to three or more antibiotics. Patients with Gram-negative IE were 4.2 times more likely to die. The mortality risk was 4 times higher when bacteria resistant to two or more antibiotics was involved and 5.7 times higher with resistance patterns to three or more antibiotics than the reference group with no antibiotic resistance. Peripheral catheters were the most common cause of multi-resistant IE, followed by heart surgery, dental procedures, and ENT interventions. Conclusions: Even though Gram-positive infections were the most frequent (83.0% of all cases), Gram-negative IE infections are substantially more deadly than Gram-positive IE infections. However, it was also observed that patients with Gram-negative infections were more likely to have underlying comorbidities, be institutionalized, and be underweight. Although the Gram-negative infections were more severe, their resistance patterns were similar to Gram-positive bacteria. As resistance patterns increase, more efforts should be made to prevent a healthcare catastrophe. At the same time, careful prophylaxis should be considered in patients at risk, including those with central catheters, undergoing dental procedures, and with poor oral hygiene.

Effect of pharmacist intervention on antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic internal fixation: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of guidelines and official policies, antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery remains suboptimal.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects and cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-led intervention in the perioperative anti-infection prophylaxis of patients undergoing orthopedic internal fixation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis based on the medical records of internal fixation surgery in a tertiary hospital from July 2019 to June 2020. Data were divided into two groups based on whether a full-time pharmacist participated in the treatment. The research parameters included use of antibiotics, rationality of medication, postoperative complications, and related cost. To deal with selection bias, propensity score matching method was employed at a ratio of 1:1. Meanwhile, a cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate the impact of pharmacist intervention on antibiotic prevention in internal fixation surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 537 participants were included in this study. After matching, 236 patients were comparable in each group. During the pharmacist intervention period, less pharmacologic prophylaxis (96.6% vs 100.0%, p = 0.007) and shorter prophylaxis duration (1.60 vs 2.28 days, p < 0.001) were observed. The reasonable rate increased dramatically in usage and dosage (96.6% vs 83.9%, p < 0.001), timing of administration (94.5% vs 78.4%, p < 0.001) and medication duration (64.4% vs 37.7%, p < 0.001). In addition, pharmacist intervention yielded net economic benefits. A remarkable reduction was observed in average length of stay (10.43 vs 11.14 days, p = 0.012), drug cost ($610.57 vs $706.60, p = 0.001) and defined daily doses (2.31 vs 3.27, p < 0.001). The cost-effectiveness ratios, divided drug cost savings by cost of pharmacist time, were 28:1 for drug and 2:1 for antibiotics, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist-driven antibiotic stewardship for orthopedic internal fixation patients improved compliance with peri-procedure antibiotic prophylaxis, and reduced the cost and utilization of antibiotics. This helped to bring significant clinical and economic benefits.

Clinical features and antimicrobial susceptibility of oral bacteria isolated from the blood cultures of patients with infective endocarditis

Background/purpose

The epidemiology of infective endocarditis (IE) is under constant change due to the aging society and increases in antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. However, IE remains severe. This study aimed to review the current clinical characteristics of IE and the antimicrobial susceptibility of oral bacteria (OB) isolated from blood cultures to implement appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively investigated the clinical features of 180 patients with IE in whom OB and pathogens except OB (eOB) were identified as causative microorganisms via blood cultures. The susceptibility of the OB group to eight antibiotics was examined by broth microdilution.

Results

Among causative microorganisms, the isolation rate of staphylococci was slightly higher than that of OB; however, the difference was not significant (36.7% vs. 33.8%, p = 0.3203). The number of patients with underlying cardiac disease was significantly higher in the OB group than in the eOB group (53.7% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.0113). Only one ampicillin-resistant OB was detected (2.0%). OBs were significantly less susceptible to clarithromycin and azithromycin than to ampicillin (98.0% vs. 66.7% and 98.0% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0003, respectively). Moreover, OBs were significantly less susceptible to clarithromycin and azithromycin than to clindamycin (66.7% vs. 88.2% and 60.0% vs. 88.2%, p = 0.0301 and p = 0.0217, respectively).

Conclusion

OBs were susceptible to ampicillin. However, the susceptibility of OBs to clarithromycin and azithromycin was significantly lower than that to ampicillin and clindamycin. These results are important and should help decisions regarding guide antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Current Concepts in Prophylactic Antibiotics in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Antibiotic prophylaxis is the use of antibiotics in the perioperative period to prevent surgical site infections from local flora. Specific guidelines and criteria exist to prevent these infections while also practicing antimicrobial stewardship. Most dentoalveolar procedures do not require antibiotic prophylaxis. For nondentoalveolar procedures, the decision to provide antibiotic prophylaxis is based on involvement of the respiratory, oral, or pharyngeal mucosa. Special considerations exist for patients at high risk for infective endocarditis, patients with head and neck cancer, and temporomandibular joint replacement procedures. This article discusses indications for antibiotic prophylaxis during oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures.

Antibiotika im Rahmen der Endokarditisprophylaxe – Risiko und Nutzen

Für die Effektivität und Effizienz einer antibiotischen Prophylaxe vor zahnmedizinischen Eingriffen zum Schutz vor einer infektiösen Endokarditis liegt nur eine geringe Evidenz vor, die keine Rechtfertigung zur generalisierten Therapie von Patienten mit einem erhöhten Endokarditisrisiko darstellt. Aktuelle Leitlinien empfehlen daher, Antibiotika im Rahmen der Endokarditisprophylaxe auf Patienten zu beschränken, die zum einen ein hohes Risiko für die Entstehung einer infektiösen Endokarditis aufweisen und die sich zum anderen zahnärztlichen Eingriffen mit höchstem Endokarditisrisiko unterziehen. Einen hohen Stellwert besitzen allerdings auch Mund- und Hauthygienemaßnahmen, die nicht nur auf Risikopatienten, sondern auch auf die Allgemeinbevölkerung angewendet werden sollten, da die Inzidenz der infektiösen Endokarditis bei Patienten ohne anamnestisch bekannte Herzerkrankung zunehmend ansteigt.

Endocarditis prophylaxis in daily practice of pediatricians and dentists in Flanders

Endocarditis is a potentially life-threatening disease in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and correct prophylaxis (EP) is of utmost importance. We conducted two surveys among pediatricians and dentists in Flanders about their knowledge of EP guidelines. The survey was completed by 910 dentists and 100 pediatricians. Sixty-five percent of the dentists did not know any guideline. They relied for information on the internet or the child's physician. 87% identified low risk treatments correctly, but only 64% identified high risk procedures correctly. Eighty-three percent asked for the presence of CHD and allergy to antibiotics. Dentists asked advice of the patient's physician, but 29% would withhold treatments in high-risk patients and 50% did not know the pediatric antibiotic dosages. Forty-seven percent of the pediatricians did not know EP guidelines and they would preferably contact the child's cardiologist. Pediatricians had difficulties with the identification of low-risk procedures and would give unnecessary antibiotics. They identified most CHD at high risk, but scored lower for the identification of lower risk CHD.Conclusion: The knowledge of Flemish dentists and pediatricians of EP guidelines is low. The knowledge about EP guidelines and the communication between dentists and pediatricians should be improved. Patients should be provided with an individual EP card. What is Known: • The knowledge of dentists and cardiologists about EP is not perfect, which has already been described. • There are several guidelines about EP, and they are not identical and sometimes confusing. What is New: • This is the first article combining large scale surveys of the knowledge and application of EP by dentists and pediatricians, allowing us to compare knowledge and gaps of knowledge and use their complementarity in order to offer tailored solutions and use patient education and partnership.

Antibiotic Therapy in Dentistry

Dental caries, pulpal necrosis, trauma, and periodontal diseases can result in dental infections which could have severe consequences that affect both soft and hard tissues of the oral cavity. Dental infections commonly present with symptoms of pain, fever, and swelling. Surgical and endodontic treatments are the early management of infected teeth, followed by antibiotic therapy. Some alternative methods also exist for treating infection such as low-level laser therapy and photodynamic therapy. Antibiotics are generally used in dental procedures to treat odontogenic infections, nonodontogenic infections, local infection, focal infection, and prophylaxis. Antibiotic prophylaxis is prescribed for patients with immunosuppressed conditions, infective endocarditis, metabolic disorders, and patients with prosthetic joints. To reduce the complications of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions especially bacterial resistance, comprehensive guidelines should be established. It has been noted that only about 12% of dentists adequately and correctly prescribe antibiotics, which shows the importance of comprehensive guidelines. Antibiotics prescription may result in some adverse effects such as hypersensitivity reactions and dermatological and allergic disorders. Furthermore, unnecessary prescription of antibiotics could result in several serious sequelae, for example, bacterial resistance, gastric and hematological problems, and diversion of bacterial microbiota. The present review attempts to summarize the indications of antibiotic therapy in dentistry and discuss the common types of antibiotics that are routinely used in dental practice based on pharmacologic classes. Moreover, types of antibiotics that are considered safe during pregnancy and childhood are also reviewed.