Implant-oriented navigation in orbital reconstruction part II: preclinical cadaver study

Digital planning and individual implants for secondary reconstruction of midfacial deformities: A pilot study

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of implementing three‐dimensional virtual surgical planning (VSP) and subsequent transfer by additive manufactured tools in the secondary reconstruction of residual post‐traumatic deformities in the midface.

Methods

Patients after secondary reconstruction of post‐traumatic midfacial deformities were included in this case series. The metrical deviation between the virtually planned and postoperative position of patient‐specific implants (PSI) and bone segments was measured at corresponding reference points. Further information collected included demographic data, post‐traumatic symptoms, and type of transfer tools.

Results

Eight consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. In five patients, VSP with subsequent manufacturing of combined predrilling/osteotomy guides and PSI was performed. In three patients, osteotomy guides, repositioning guides, and individually prebent plates were used following VSP. The median distances between the virtually planned and the postoperative position of the PSI were 2.01 mm (n = 18) compared to a median distance concerning the bone segments of 3.05 mm (n = 12). In patients where PSI were used, the median displacement of the bone segments was lower (n = 7, median 2.77 mm) than in the group with prebent plates (n = 5, 3.28 mm).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the feasibility of VSP and transfer by additive manufactured tools for the secondary reconstruction of complex residual post‐traumatic deformities in the midface. However, the median deviations observed in this case series were unexpectedly high. The use of navigational systems may further improve the level of accuracy.

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of implementing three‐dimensional virtual surgical planning (VSP) and subsequent transfer by additive manufactured tools in the secondary reconstruction of residual post‐traumatic deformities in the midface. This study demonstrated the feasibility of VSP and transfer by additive manufactured tools for the secondary reconstruction of complex residual post‐traumatic deformities in the midface. However, the median deviations observed in this case series were unexpectedly high. The use of navigational systems may further improve the level of accuracy.

Critical appraisal of patient-specific implants for secondary post-traumatic orbital reconstruction

In orbital reconstruction, a patient-specific implant (PSI) may provide accurate reconstruction in complex cases, since the design can be tailored to the anatomy. Several design options may be embedded, for ease of positioning and precision of reconstruction. This study describes a cohort of 22 patients treated for secondary orbital reconstruction with a PSI; one patient received two PSI. The preoperative clinical characteristics and implant design options used are presented. When compared to preoperative characteristics, the postoperative clinical outcomes showed significant improvements in terms of enophthalmos (P < 0.001), diplopia (P < 0.001), and hypoglobus (P = 0.002). The implant position in all previous reconstructions was considered inadequate. Quantitative analysis after PSI reconstruction showed accurate positioning of the implant, with small median and 90th percentile deviations (roll: median 1.3°, 90th percentile 4.6°; pitch: median 1.4°, 90th percentile 3.9°; yaw: median 1.0°, 90th percentile 4.4°; translation: median 1.4 mm, 90th percentile 2.7 mm). Rim support proved to be a significant predictor of roll and rim extension for yaw. No significant relationship between design options or PSI position and clinical outcomes could be established. The results of this study show the benefits of PSI for the clinical outcomes in a large cohort of secondary post-traumatic orbital reconstructions.

Accuracy of free-hand positioned patient specific implants (PSI) in primary reconstruction after inferior and/or medial orbital wall fractures

BACKGROUND

To assess the accuracy with which CAD/CAM-fabricated patient-specific titanium implants (PSI) are positioned for inferior and/or medial orbital wall reconstruction without the use of intraoperative navigation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a primary reconstruction of the orbital walls with PSI due to fractures were enrolled in this retrospective cohort analysis. The primary outcome variables were the mean surface distances (MSD) between virtually planned and postoperative PSI position and single linear deviations in the x-, y- and z-axis at corresponding reference points. Secondary outcome variables included demographic data, classification of orbital wall defects and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 33 PSI (orbital floor n = 22; medial wall, n = 11) were examined in 27 patients. MSD was on a comparable level for the orbital floor and medial wall (median 0.39 mm, range 0.22-1.53 mm vs. median 0.42 mm, range 0.21-0.98 mm; p = 0.56). Single linear deviations were lower for reconstructions of the orbital floor compared to the medial wall (median 0.45 vs. 0.79 mm; p < 0.05). There was no association between the occurrence of diplopia and the accuracy level (p = 0.418).

CONCLUSIONS

Free-hand positioning of PSI reaches a clinically appropriate level of accuracy, limiting the necessity of navigational systems to selected cases.

Robot-Assisted Maxillary Positioning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Feasibility and Accuracy Evaluation

Several methods enabling independent repositioning of the maxilla have been introduced to reduce intraoperative errors inherent in the intermediate splint. However, the accuracy is still to be improved and a different approach without time-consuming laboratory process is needed, which can allow perioperative modification of unoptimized maxillary position. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a robot arm combined with intraoperative image-guided navigation in orthognathic surgery. The experiments were performed on 12 full skull phantom models. After Le Fort I osteotomy, the maxillary segment was repositioned to a different target position using a robot arm and image-guided navigation and stabilized. Using the navigation and the postoperative computed tomography (CT) images, the achieved maxillary position was compared with the planned position. Although the maxilla showed mild displacement during the fixation, the mean absolute deviations from the target position were 0.16 mm, 0.18 mm, and 0.20 mm in medio-lateral, antero-posterior, and supero-inferior directions, respectively, in the intraoperative navigation. Compared with the target position using postoperative CT, the achieved maxillary position had a mean absolute deviation of less than 0.5 mm for all dimensions and the mean root mean square deviation was 0.79 mm. The results of this study suggest that the robot arm combined with the intraoperative image-guided navigation may have great potential for surgical plan transfer with the accurate repositioning of the maxilla in the orthognathic surgery.

Virtual splint registration for electromagnetic and optical navigation in orbital and craniofacial surgery

In intra-operative navigation, a registration procedure is performed to register the patient's position to the pre-operative imaging data. The registration process is the main factor that determines accuracy of the navigation feedback. In this study, a novel registration protocol for craniofacial surgery is presented, that utilizes a virtual splint with marker points. The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated by two observers in five human cadaver heads, for optical and electromagnetic navigation, and compared to maxillary bone-anchored fiducial registration (optical and electromagnetic) and surface-based registration (electromagnetic). The results showed minimal differences in accuracy compared to bone-anchored fiducials at the level of the infra-orbital rim. Both point-based techniques had lower error estimates at the infraorbital rim than surface-based registration, but surface-based registration had the lowest loss of accuracy over target distance. An advantage over existing point-based registration methods (bone-anchored fiducials, existing splint techniques) is that radiological imaging does not need to be repeated, since the need for physical fiducials to be present in the image volume is eradicated. Other advantages include reduction of invasiveness compared to bone-achnored fiducials and a possible reduction of human error in the registration process.

Surgical instrument to improve implant positioning in orbital reconstruction: a feasibility study

Adequate positioning of an orbital implant during orbital reconstruction surgery is essential for restoration of the pre-traumatised anatomy, but visual appraisal of its position is limited by the keyhole access and protruding soft tissues. A positioning instrument that attaches to the implant was designed to provide feedback outside the orbit. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of placement with the instrument and compare it with the accuracy of placement by visual appraisal. Ten orbits in five human cadaver heads were reconstructed twice: once using visual appraisal and once using the instrument workflow. No significant improvement was found for the roll (5.8° vs 3.4°, respectively, p=0.16), pitch (2.1° vs 1.5°, p=0.56), or translation (2.9 mm vs 3.3 mm, p=0.77), but the yaw was significantly reduced if the instrument workflow was used (15.3° vs 2.9°, p=0.02). The workflow is associated with low costs and low logistical demands, and may prevent outliers in implant positioning in a clinical setting when intraoperative navigation or patient-specific implants are not available.