Microbiological analysis of autologous bone particles obtained by low-speed drilling and treated with different decontamination agents

Effect of amoxicillin and clindamycin on the gene expression of markers involved in osteoblast physiology

Background/purpose

Amoxicillin and clindamycin are the most effective decontaminants for intraoral bone grafts before their application in bone regeneration without cytotoxic effects on osteoblasts, but their effects on the gene expression of markers involved in osteoblast growth and differentiation remain unclear. The study objective was to determine the effects of amoxicillin and clindamycin on the gene expression of markers involved in osteoblast growth and differentiation.

Materials and methods

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to explore the effect of 150 μg/mL clindamycin or 400 μg/mL amoxicillin on the gene expression by primary human osteoblasts (HOBs) of runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx-2), osterix (OSX), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin (OSC), osteoprotegerin (OPG), receptor activator for nuclear factor κ B ligand (RANKL), type I collagen (Col-I), bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 7 (BMP-2 and BMP-7), TGF-β1 and TGF-β receptors (TGF-βR1, TGF-βR2, and TGF-βR3), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

Results

Treatment with 150 μg/mL clindamycin significantly increased the gene expression of TFG-β1, TGF-βR1, TGF-βR2, TGF-βR3, RUNX-2, Col-1, OSX, OSC, BMP-2, BMP-7, ALP, VEGF, and RANKL by HOBs. Treatment with 400 μg/mL amoxicillin significantly increased the gene expression of TGF-β R1, Col-I, OSC, RANKL, and OPG alone.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that 150 μg/mL clindamycin is the decontaminant of choice to treat intraoral bone grafts before their application in bone regeneration. The osteogenic and antibacterial properties of clindamycin can favor and accelerate the integration of bone grafts in the oral cavity.

Regeneration Membranes Loaded with Non-Antibiotic Anti-2 Microbials: A Review

Both guided bone and guided tissue regeneration are techniques that require the use of barrier membranes. Contamination and infection of the surgical area is one of the most feared complications. Some current lines of research focus on functionalizing these membranes with different antimicrobial agents. The objective of this study was to carry out a review of the use and antibacterial properties of regeneration membranes doped with antimicrobials such as zinc, silver, chlorhexidine, and lauric acid. The protocol was based on PRISMA recommendations, addressing the PICO question: "Do membranes doped with non-antibiotic antimicrobials have antibacterial activity that can reduce or improve infection compared to membranes not impregnated with said antimicrobial?" Methodological quality was evaluated using the RoBDEMAT tool. A total of 329 articles were found, of which 25 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Most studies agree that zinc inhibits bacterial growth as it decreases colony-forming units, depending on the concentration used and the bacterial species studied. Silver compounds also decreased the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and presented less bacterial adhesion to the membrane. Some concentrations of chlorhexidine that possess antimicrobial activity have shown high toxicity. Finally, lauric acid shows inhibition of bacterial growth measured by the disk diffusion test, the inhibition zone being larger with higher concentrations. Antimicrobial agents such as zinc, silver, chlorhexidine, and lauric acid have effective antibacterial activity and can be used to dope regenerative membranes in order to reduce the risk of bacterial colonization.

Efficacy of local antibiotic therapy in the treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to state the efficacy of local administration of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis in terms of peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) reduction.

DATA, SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted. Screening process was done using the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE by PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane Oral Health. Included articles were randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Weighted means were calculated. Heterogeneity was determined using Higgins (I2). Due to the encountered heterogeneity between the studies being combined, random-effects models were applied in order to analyze effect sizes. Twelve studies (365 patients and 463 implants) were included in the systematic review. After peri-implantitis treatment with local antibiotics, PPD was reduced 1.40 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.82-1.98). When local antibiotics were applied, a 0.30 mm higher reduction of PPD was obtained than in the control group (95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.53). BoP attained an odds ratio value of 1.82 (95% confidence interval: 1.09-3.04), indicating that the likehood of bleeding is almost two-fold when antibiotics are not locally administrated. Adverse effects were not found after applying local antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The local antibiotic administration does reduce, without adverse effects, both peri-implant probing depths and bleeding on probing in patients affected by peri-implantitis, if compared to control groups without local antibiotic application.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Patients with dental implants frequently suffer from peri-implantitis. Clinical features of peri-implantitis lesions include the presence of bleeding on probing and increased peri-implant probing depths. Both BoP and PPD have become reduced after local administration of antibiotics.