The benefit of surgical management in post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy: a retrospective analysis

Post-Traumatic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review of Understanding, Management, and Prognosis

This study provides an updated overview of the clinical characteristics of post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain (PTNP) resulting from dental procedures or facial trauma, addressing its etiology, prevalence, evaluation, management, and prognosis. PTNP arises from injury to the trigeminal nerve, which governs sensory and motor functions in the maxillofacial region. The prevalence and characteristics of PTNP vary considerably across studies, with a reported prevalence ranging from 1.55% to 13%. The predominant causative factors are dental procedures, particularly third molar removal and implant placement. While gender distribution varies, a trend towards higher incidence in females is observed, particularly within the 40-60-year age group. Anatomically, the mandibular nerve is frequently involved. PTNP presents with a spectrum of symptoms ranging from tingling sensations to severe pain. Diagnostic challenges arise due to the lack of standardized criteria and potential overlap with focal neuralgia, necessitating comprehensive evaluation. Misdiagnosis can lead to prolonged patient suffering and unnecessary interventions. Successful management hinges on prompt diagnosis and interdisciplinary collaboration, with early intervention crucial in mitigating progression to chronic pain. Although nerve recovery post-trauma is challenging, preventive measures through accurate evaluation and treatment are paramount. Management strategies for PTNP include non-invasive and surgical interventions, with non-invasive approaches encompassing systemic and local pharmacological management. This narrative review aims to enhance uniformity in PTNP evaluation and treatment approaches, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.

Is Presurgical Pain Intensity Related to Postoperative Recurrence of Post-Traumatic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain?

PURPOSE

Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain (PTTNp) is a challenging condition to treat, and equally as challenging is the identification of surgical outcome variables to guide treatment. The study purpose was to determine if preoperative pain intensity was related to postoperative recurrence of PTTNp.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study assessed subjects with preoperative PTTNp of either the lingual or inferior alveolar nerves who underwent elective microneurosurgery at a single institution. Two cohorts were established as follows: No PTTNp at 6 months (group 1); presence of PTTNp at 6 months (group 2). The primary predictor variable was the preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score. The primary outcome variable was PTTNp (recurrence or no recurrence at 6 months). The demographic and injury characteristics of the groups were compared to assess whether they were similar using Wilcoxon rank analysis. Two-tailed Student's t-test was performed to analyze the difference in preoperative mean VAS scores. Multivariate multiple linear regression models were used to determine the association between the covariates on the outcomes of the primary predictor variable and the primary outcome variable. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. There were 20 patients with no pain at 6 months and 28 with recurrence at 6 months following surgery. There was a significant difference in mean preoperative pain intensity between the two groups (P value .04). The mean preoperative VAS score in group 1 was 6.31 (standard deviation, 2.65), while the mean preoperative VAS score in group 2 was 7.75 (standard deviation, 1.95). Regression analysis showed that one covariate, the type of nerve injured, explained some variability of preoperative VAS score, but by only 16% (P value .005). Regression analysis also showed that two covariates, Sunderland classification and time to surgery, explained some of the variability of PTTNp at 6 months, by approximately 30% (P value .001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that presurgical pain intensity level was related to postoperative recurrence in the surgical treatment of PTTNp. In patients with recurrence, the preoperative pain intensity was higher. Other factors, including time interval from injury to surgery, were also related to recurrence.

How Does Changing the Time to Surgery Affect the Recurrence of Post-Traumatic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain

PURPOSE

The recurrence of post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain (PTTNp) following peripheral microneurosurgery continues to be poorly understood. The objective of this study was to determine if the time from injury to surgery of the trigeminal nerve in patients with PTTNp affected the recurrence of PTTNp following surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients with PTTNp prior to trigeminal nerve surgery at a single institute was analyzed for the presence or absence of PTTNp at 6 months postsurgery. The primary predictor was the time from injury to surgical treatment and the primary outcome was the presence or absence of PTTNp using subjective and objective neurosensory testing at 6 months. Four groups were predefined to evaluate the effect of time to surgery: Group 1 (0 to 100 days), Group 2 (101 to 200 days), Group 3 (201 to 300 days), and Group 4 (> 300 days). Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess differences in the presence or absence of PTTNp among groups. If a statistical difference was found, a post hoc Tukey-Kramer test was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty of 63 eligible patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria with end points at 6 months. The weighted mean PTTNp score in Group 1 was 1.6 ± 0.32, Group 2 was 1.61 ± 0.18, Group 3 was 1.3 ± 0.29, and Group 4 was 1 ± 0.0. There was a statistically significant difference in the primary outcome among the groups based on time from injury to repair (P = .0002). The between-group differences were significant for Group 1 and 3 and 4 and between Group 2 and 3 and 4 (P < .01). Within the 4 cohorts, the percentage of patients with PTTNp before surgery with no neuropathic pain at the 6-month follow-up was 41.6%. However, between the 4 cohorts, when the time to surgery was 200 days or less, the percentage of patients with PTTNp before surgery with no neuropathic pain at the 6-month follow-up was more than 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Time from injury to surgery appears to have an effect on the recurrence of PTTNp. Best outcomes are associated with operative interventions within 200 days of the injury.

Post-traumatic Trigeminal Neuropathy Associated With Endodontic Therapy: A Systematic Review

A painful or non-painful trigeminal nerve lesion brought on by trauma that exhibits symptoms and/or clinical evidence of trigeminal nerve dysfunction is known as painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTTN). In relation to this, the term post-traumatic persistent dentoalveolar pain (PDAP) is an idiopathic condition of chronic neuropathic origin that manifests as a diagnostic challenge for dental practitioners. Neuropathic pain is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as "pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system." PDAP is located primarily in the teeth and jaws. This study systematically reviews how likely it is to get painful PTTN if the patient received endodontic therapy and the duration between doing root canal therapy (RCT) and getting PTTN. A systematic review was carried out using key search terms from PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) with English as the only permitted language. There were strict inclusion requirements. The 10 articles that were included showed a prevalence of an endodontic procedure anywhere from three to 48 months following post-endodontic treatment, and it mainly affects females in their mid-40s with no variation regarding the areas, whether it is in the maxilla or mandible. The lack of information about the association between RCT and PTTN led practitioners to make wrong diagnoses, which made the patient unwilling to seek further help. So, in this review, we identified some visible characteristics that can help in that process.

Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy: correlation between objective and subjective assessments and a prediction model for neurosensory recovery

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTN) can have a substantial effect on patient well-being. However, the relation between the neuropathic symptoms and their effect on psychosocial functioning remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between objective and subjective assessments of neurosensory function in PTN and predict neurosensory outcome using baseline measurements.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study included patients diagnosed with PTN at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium, between April 2018 and May 2020. Standardized objective and subjective neurosensory examinations were recorded simultaneously on multiple occasions during the follow-up period. Correlation analyses and principal component analysis were conducted, and a prediction model of neurosensory recovery was developed.

RESULTS

Quality of life correlated significantly (P < 0.05) with percentage of affected dermatome (ρ = - 0.35), the presence of brush stroke allodynia (ρ = - 0.24), gain-of-function sensory phenotype (ρ = - 0.41), Medical Research Council Scale (ρ = 0.36), and Sunderland classification (ρ = - 0.21). Quality of life was not significantly correlated (P > 0.05) with directional discrimination, stimulus localization, two-point discrimination, or sensory loss-of-function. The prediction model showed a negative predictive value for neurosensory recovery after 6 months of 87%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a strong correlation of subjective well-being with the presence of brush stroke allodynia, thermal and/or mechanical hyperesthesia, and the size of the neuropathic area. These results suggest that positive symptoms dominate the effect on affect. In patients reporting poor subjective well-being in the absence of positive symptoms or a large neuropathic area, additional attention towards psychosocial triggers might enhance treatment outcome. The prediction model could contribute to establishing realistic expectations about the likelihood of neurosensory recovery but remains to be validated in future studies.