Changes in the temporomandibular joint position depending on the sagittal osteotomy technique and extent of mandibular movement

Evaluation of bone contact area and intercondylar distance changes in orthognathic surgery - a comparison between BSSO and HSSO technique depending on mandibular displacement extent

OBJECTIVES

The present study aims to assess the impact of bilateral and high oblique sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO/HSSO), as well as displacement distances and directions on the expected and achievable bone contact area (BCA) and changes in the intercondylar distance (ICD). The primary question addressed is whether mandibular splitting through BSSO results in a greater BCA and/or ICD when compared to splitting through HSSO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Totally 80 mandibular displacements were performed on 20 fresh cadavers, for each subject, four splints were produces to facilitate mandibular advancement as well as setbacks of 4 and 8 mm. Pre- and postoperative CBCT scans were performed to plan the surgical procedures and to analyze the expected and achieved BCA and ICD.

RESULTS

Regarding the maximum mandibular displacement, the expected BCA for HSSO/BSSO were 352.58 ± 96.55mm2 and 1164.00 ± 295.50mm2, respectively, after advancement and 349.11 ± 98.42mm2 and 1344.70 ± 287.23mm2, respectively, after setback. The achieved BCA for HSSO/BSSO were 229.37 ± 75.90mm2 and 391.38 ± 189.01mm2, respectively, after advancement and 278.03 ± 97.65mm2 and 413.52 ± 169.52 mm2, respectively after setback. The expected ICD for HSSO/BSSO were 4.51 ± 0.73 mm and 3.25 ± 1.17 mm after advancement and - 5.76 ± 1.07 mm and - 4.28 ± 1.58 mm after setback. The achieved ICD for HSSO/BSSO were 2.07 ± 2.9 mm and 1.7 ± 0.60 mm after advancement and - 2.57 ± 2.78 mm and - 1.28 ± 0.84 mm after setback. Significant differences between the BCA after HSSO and BSSO were at each displacement (p < 0.001), except for the achieved BCA after 8-mm setback and advancement (p ≥ 0.266). No significant differences were observed regarding ICD, except for the expected ICD after 8-mm setback and advancement (p ≤ 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the virtual planning, the predictability regarding BCA and ICD was limited. ICD showed smaller clinical changes, BCA decreased significantly in the BSSO group.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

BCA and ICD might have been less important in choosing the suitable split technique. in orthognathic surgery.

Evaluation of the Lingual Splitting Patterns and the Lateral Bone Cut Ends Following Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most popular orthognathic procedure performed by maxillofacial surgeons to treat skeletal class II and class III and to correct mandibular asymmetries. The study aimed to evaluate the lingual splitting patterns and lateral bone cut end (LBCE) in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and their relation with the ramal thickness and the presence of impacted third molars using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). This prospective observational study included patients with mandibular prognathism who were treated with BSSO with or without Le Fort I osteotomy. Cone beam computed tomography was used to measure the ramal thickness preoperatively and to evaluate the LBCE, and the lingual splitting patterns postoperatively. Twenty-one patients (42 sides) were included in this study. The most commonly observed lingual splitting pattern was type III (47.6%), while the most common LBCE was type B (59.5%). The bad split was encountered 8 times on 42 sides (16.7%). A nonsignificant relationship between the ramal thickness and bad splitting was observed ( P =0.901). Impacted third molars were present in 16 of the 42 sides (38.1%) and had no significant effect on the occurrence of bad splitting ( P =0.063). Type III lingual splitting pattern and type B LBCE were the most commonly observed patterns. No direct association was observed concerning the presence of impacted mandibular third molars and the thickness of the ramus with the occurrence of bad splitting.

Mandibular stability and condylar changes following orthognathic surgery in mandibular hypoplasia patients associated with preoperative condylar resorption

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate postoperative mandibular stability and condylar changes in patients with mandibular hypoplasia and preoperative condylar resorption (CR) undergoing orthognathic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients were included in this retrospective study. Computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired preoperatively (T0), 2-7 days immediate postoperatively (T1), and at least 1 year postoperatively (T2). Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis and measurements of condylar angle, volume, and position (joint spaces) were performed. A 2-mm mandibular relapse was deemed clinically acceptable. We also analyzed the correlations between relapse and postoperative CR and susceptible factors using a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The results showed one year after the surgery, the average mandibular relapse was 1.0 mm (p < 0.05), and the average reduction of condylar volume was 152.4 mm³ (12.7%). Condyle-fossa relationships were improved immediately after the surgery, with a tendency of returning to their original state in the follow-up (p < 0.05). Anteroposterior advancement at point B (B-CP advancement) at T1 and superior joint space (SJS) at T0 were significantly correlated with mandibular relapse, and postoperative CR was mainly associated with vertical increasement at point B (B-AP increasement) at T1. The optimal cut-off values were as follows: 1.6 mm for SJS, 4.2 mm for B-CP advancement, and 1.8 mm for B-AP increasement. Concomitant advancement Genioplasty showed no significant correlation with relapse and postoperative CR.

CONCLUSIONS

While patients with mandibular hypoplasia and preoperative CR were vulnerable to further condylar resorption after mandibular advancement, the treatment outcomes were generally clinically acceptable. Postoperative relapse was associated with a larger than 4.2 mm of mandibular advancement measured at B-CP and a larger than 1.6 mm of superior joint space measured at SJS, and postoperative CR was associated with a larger than 1.8 mm of mandibular vertical increasement measured at B-AP.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggested that the mandibular advancement might be limited to 5 mm for patients with preoperative CR. A concomitant advancement genioplasty might also be considered to achieve a better facial profile in these patients.

Biomechanical Effects of Different Miniplate Thicknesses and Fixation Methods Applied in BSSO Surgery Under Two Occlusal Conditions

Purpose

Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to evaluate the effects of different thicknesses, numbers, and positions of the miniplate applied in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) under two occlusal conditions.

Methods

An FEA model of the mandibles was constructed and combined with different thicknesses (0.6 or 1 mm), number (one or two), positions (upper or lower) of a miniplate and was divided into six models. In addition, external forces were applied to the muscles to simulate the intercuspal position (ICP) and right unilateral molar clench. This study used the reaction force of the temporomandibular joints and the stress of the mandible as observation indexes.

Results

The results of this study show that, under ICP, the 0.6 mm lower model generated greater TMJ force reaction compared to the 0.6 mm upper model. The same trend was seen in the 1 mm lower model compared to the 1 mm upper model. Regarding the stress of the bone on the screw-implanted sites, under ICP, screw 10 showed greater stress than screw 2, and screw 11 showed greater stress than screw 3. The stress values of the miniplates showed, under ICP, point 1-c was greater than point 3-c, and point 1-b was greater than point 3-b.

Conclusion

In the case of BSSO mandibular advancement surgery, implanting the miniplate at the upper position can reduce the force on the TMJ and the stress on the distal segment of the mandible. The miniplate can also resist the tensile stress more effectively. In addition, implanting two miniplates with thinner sizes may be an alternative in clinical practice.

TMJ Position in Symmetric Dentofacial Deformity

The aim of this research was to analyze the facial class, presence of malocclusion, and the mandibular plane and to relate this to the mandibular condyle position. A cross-sectional study in subjects under analysis for orthognathic surgery was done. The mandibular plane, the gonial angle, and the molar class were included to compare the coronal and sagittal position of the condyle and the joint space observed in the CBCT. The measurements were obtained by the same observer at an interval of two weeks. In addition, the Spearman test was performed to determine the correlation using a p value < 0.05 to observe any significant differences. Eighty-nine male and female subjects (18 to 58 years old, 24.6 ± 10.5) were included. In the coronal section, subjects with CIII had a greater mediolateral distance (MLD, p = 0.0001) and greater vertical distance (SID, p = 0.0001) than subjects with CII. In terms of the skeletal class and the mandibular plane, it was observed that subjects in the CII group had a greater mandibular angle (open angle) (p = 0.04) than the CII group and was related to the anterior position of the condyle. The most anterior condylar position was observed in the CII group (p = 0.03), whereas a posterior condylar position was significant in CIII subjects (p = 0.03). We can conclude that the sagittal position of the TMJ was related to the mandibular plane and the skeletal class showing a higher mandibular angle and most anterior position of the condyle in CII subjects and a lower mandibular angle and most posterior position of the condyle in CIII subjects. The implications for surgical treatment have to be considered.