Evaluating the accuracy of resection planes in mandibular surgery using a preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative approach

Accuracy of the modified tooth-supported 3D printing surgical guides based on CT, CBCT, and intraoral scanning in maxillofacial region: A comparison study

BACKGROUND

Tooth-supported surgical guides have demonstrated superior accuracy compared with bone-supported guides. This study aimed to modify the fabrication of tooth-supported guides for compatibility with tumor resection procedures and investigate their accuracy.

METHODS

Patients with tumors who underwent osteotomy with the assistance of modified tooth- or bone-supported surgical guides were included. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) was employed to align three dimensional (3D) models extracted from intraoperative computed tomography (CT) images. The distances and angular deviations between the actual osteotomy plane and preoperative plane were recorded. A comparative analysis of osteotomy discrepancies between tooth-supported and bone-supported guides, as well as among tooth-supported guides based on CT, cone-beam CT (CBCT), or intraoral scanner (IOS) was conducted. The factors influencing the precision of the guides were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with 81 resection planes were included in this study. In the tooth-supported group, the mean deviations in the osteotomy plane and angle were 1.39 mm and 4.30°, respectively, whereas those of the bone-supported group were 2.16 mm and 4.95°. In the tooth-supported isotype guide groups, the mean deviations of the osteotomy plane were 1.39 mm, 1.47 mm, 1.23 mm across CT, CBCT, and IOS, respectively. The accuracy of the modified tooth-supported guides remained consistent regardless of number and position of the teeth supporting the guide and location of the osteotomy lines.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that the modified tooth-supported surgical guides demonstrated high accuracy in the maxillofacial region, contributing to a reduction in the amount of surgically detached soft tissue.

Development of a universal cutting guide for raising deep circumflex iliac artery flaps

PURPOSE

The deep circumflex iliac crest flap (DCIA) is used for the reconstruction of the jaw. For fitting of the transplant by computer-aided planning (CAD), a computerized tomography (CT) of the jaw and the pelvis is necessary. Ready-made cutting guides save a pelvic CT and healthcare resources while maintaining the advantages of the CAD planning.

METHODS

A total of 2000 CTs of the pelvis were divided into groups of 500 by sex and age (≤ 45 and > 45 years). Three-dimensional (3D) pelvis models were aligned and averaged. Cutting guides were designed on the averaged pelvis for each group and an overall averaged pelvis. The cutting guides and 50 randomly selected iliac crests (10 from each group and 10 from the whole collective) were 3D printed. The appropriate cutting guide was mounted to the iliac crest and a cone beam CT was performed. The thickness of the space between the iliac crest and the cutting guide was evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall the mean thickness of the space was 2.137 mm and the mean volume of the space was 4513 mm3. The measured values were significantly different between the different groups. The overall averaged group had not the greatest volume, maximum thickness and mean thickness of the space.

CONCLUSION

Ready-made cutting guides for the DCIA flap fit to the iliac crest and make quick and accurate flap raising possible while radiation dose and resources can be saved. The cutting guides fit sufficient to the iliac crest and should keep the advantages of a standard CAD planning.

Evaluation of the resection plane three-dimensional positional accuracy using a resection guide directional guidance slot; a randomized clinical trial

AIM

The study was performed to compare the mandibular resection guide with a directional guidance slot with the conventional guide regarding three-dimensional positional accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with lateral segmental mandibular defects were selected, and randomly allocated into two groups. All defects were managed with preoperative virtual surgical planning. Resection in the test group was conducted using a resection guide with a directional guidance slot, while a conventional resection guide design was utilized in the control group. The linear and angular deviation of the osteotomy planes was analyzed for both groups, along with the accuracy of the insertion of the reconstruction bone block in the resected defect. Data were documented, absolute deviation was calculated, statistical analysis was performed and significance was set at the 5% level.

RESULTS

The cases conducted with a directional guidance templet reported a statistically significant difference when compared to the conventional edge-cutting guide regarding the linear and angular spatial osteotomy plane position (P < 0.001). The defect span analysis reported excellent levels of agreement in both groups (ICC = 1.00, ICC = 0.995), however, the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated the enhanced positional accuracy of the resection plane and reconstruction block placement when a directional slot is incorporated in the computer-generated resection guide.

Geometric Cuts by an Autonomous Laser Osteotome Increase Stability in Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Grafts: A Cadaver Study

BACKGROUND

Nonunion and plate exposure represent a major complication after mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps. These drawbacks may be resolved by geometric osteotomies increasing intersegmental bone contact area and stability.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare intersegmental bone contact and stability of geometric osteotomies to straight osteotomies in mandibular reconstructions with free fibula grafts performed by robot-guided erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser osteotomy.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

This cadaveric in-vitro study was performed on fresh frozen human skull and fibula specimens. Computed tomography (CT) scans of all specimens were performed for virtual planning of mandibular resections and three-segment fibula reconstructions. The virtual planning was implemented in a Cold Ablation Robot-guided Laser Osteotome.

PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

For predictor variables, straight and geometric puzzle-shaped osteotomies were designed at resection of the mandible and corresponding fibula reconstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome variable was the stability of the reconstructed mandible investigated by shearing tests. Moreover, secondary outcome variables were the duration of the laser osteotomies, the contact surface area, and the accuracy of the reconstruction, both evaluated on postsurgical CT scans.

COVARIATES

Covariables were not applicable.

ANALYSES

Data were reported as mean values (± standard deviation) and were statistically analyzed using an independent-sample t-test at a significance level of α = 0.05. Root mean square deviation was tested for accuracy.

RESULTS

Eight skulls and 16 fibula specimens were used for the study. One hundred twelve successful laser osteotomies (96 straight and 16 geometrical) could be performed. Geometric osteotomies increased stability (110.2 ± 36.2 N vs 37.9 ± 20.1 N, P < .001) compared to straight osteotomies. Geometric osteotomy of the fibula took longer than straight osteotomies (10.9 ± 5.1 min vs 5.9 ± 2.2 min, P = .028) but could provide larger contact surface (431.2 ± 148.5 mm2 vs 226.1 ± 50.8 mm2, P = .04). Heat map analysis revealed a mean deviation between preoperational planning and postreconstructive CT scan of -0.8 ± 2.4 mm and a root mean square deviation of 2.51 mm.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Mandibular resection and reconstruction by fibula grafts can be accurately performed by a Cold Ablation Robot-guided Laser Osteotome without need for cutting guides. Osteotomy planning with geometric cuts offers higher stability and an increased bone contact area, which may enhance healing of the reconstructed mandible.

Intraoral Condylectomy with 3D-Printed Cutting Guide versus with Surgical Navigation: An Accuracy and Effectiveness Comparison

This study compares the accuracy and effectiveness of our novel 3D-printed titanium cutting guides with intraoperative surgical navigation for performing intraoral condylectomy in patients with mandibular condylar osteochondroma (OC). A total of 21 patients with mandibular condylar OC underwent intraoral condylectomy with either 3D-printed cutting guides (cutting guide group) or with surgical navigation (navigation group). The condylectomy accuracy in the cutting guide group and navigation group was determined by analyzing the three-dimensional (3D) discrepancies between the postoperative computed tomography (CT) images and the preoperative virtual surgical plan (VSP). Moreover, the improvement of the mandibular symmetry in both groups was determined by evaluating the chin deviation, chin rotation and mandibular asymmetry index (AI). The superimposition of the condylar osteotomy area showed that the postoperative results were very close to the VSP in both groups. The mean 3D deviation and maximum 3D deviation between the planned condylectomy and the actual result were 1.20 ± 0.60 mm and 2.36 ± 0.51 mm in the cutting guide group, and 1.33 ± 0.76 mm and 4.27 ± 1.99 mm in the navigation group. Moreover, the facial symmetry was greatly improved in both groups, indicated by significantly decreased chin deviation, chin rotation and AI. In conclusion, our results show that both 3D-printed cutting-guide-assisted and surgical-navigation-assisted methods of intraoral condylectomy have high accuracy and efficiency, while using a cutting guide can generate a relatively higher surgical accuracy. Moreover, our cutting guides exhibit user-friendly features and simplicity, which represents a promising prospect in everyday clinical practice.

Surgical Margins in 3D Planned Mandibular Resections for Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Oral Cavity

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional (3D) planned mandibular resections using cutting guides and preplanned plates are now widely used in oncological surgery. The main advantages are the gain of time, precision, and esthetic outcomes. The drawbacks include costs, time for planning, and printing the surgical tools. This time between the radiological data and the surgery may allow tumor progression, rendering the custom-made guides useless. There is no consensus regarding surgical margins that should be planned to ensure a safe oncologic outcome. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate if the planned bony margins are adequate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: Squamous cell carcinomas of the anterior and lateral floor of mouth with mandibular invasion (T4); mandibular resection using 3D planning and cutting guides. Between June 2015 to December 2019, 16 patients met the criteria. The time between the planning and the surgery was recorded. The authors decided to use a margin of at least 1 cm on the preoperative computerized tomography scans on each side of the tumors in our planning for all patients. The authors then measured the distance of the bone resection on the pathological specimen.

RESULTS

All 16 patients had safe bone surgical margins (R0). The average time from the scanners used for the planning to the surgery was 33 days.

DISCUSSION

All the cutting guides could be used. The pathology examination showed safe oncological margins and no patients required further resection. A 1 cm margin during 3D planning for mandibular resections with 3D printed cutting guides, in patients with T4 Squamous Cell Carcinomas can therefore be considered safe.

A hybrid registration method using the mandibular bone surface for electromagnetic navigation in mandibular surgery

PURPOSE

To utilize navigated mandibular (reconstructive) surgery, accurate registration of the preoperative CT scan with the actual patient in the operating room (OR) is required. In this phantom study, the feasibility of a noninvasive hybrid registration method is assessed. This method consists of a point registration with anatomic landmarks for initialization and a surface registration using the bare mandibular bone surface for optimization.

METHODS

Three mandible phantoms with reference notches on two osteotomy planes were 3D printed. An electromagnetic tracking system in combination with 3D Slicer software was used for navigation. Different configurations, i.e., different surface point areas and number and configuration of surface points, were tested with a dentate phantom (A) in a metal-free environment. To simulate the intraoperative environment and different anatomies, the registration procedure was also performed with an OR bed using the dentate phantom and two (partially) edentulous phantoms with atypical anatomy (B and C). The accuracy of the registration was calculated using the notches on the osteotomy planes and was expressed as the target registration error (TRE). TRE values of less than 2.0 mm were considered as clinically acceptable.

RESULTS

In all experiments, the mean TRE was less than 2.0 mm. No differences were found using different surface point areas or number or configurations of surface points. Registration accuracy in the simulated intraoperative setting was-mean (SD)-0.96 (0.22), 0.93 (0.26), and 1.50 (0.28) mm for phantom A, phantom B, and phantom C.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid registration is a noninvasive method that requires only a small area of the bare mandibular bone surface to obtain high accuracy in phantom setting. Future studies should test this method in clinical setting during actual surgery.

A surgical navigated cutting guide for mandibular osteotomies: accuracy and reproducibility of an image-guided mandibular osteotomy

PURPOSE

3D-printed cutting guides are the current standard to translate the virtual surgery plan to the intraoperative setting. The production of these patient-specific cutting guides is time-consuming and costly, and therefore, alternative approaches are currently subject of research. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of using a novel electromagnetic (EM) navigated surgical cutting guide to perform virtually planned osteotomies in mandible models.

METHODS

A novel 3D navigated cutting guide (dubbed Bladerunner) was designed and evaluated with a total of 20 osteotomies, performed on plaster mandibular models according to preoperative planning using EM navigation. The pre- and postoperative scans were registered, and the difference between the preoperatively planned osteotomy and the performed osteotomy was expressed as the distance between the planned and performed cutting planes, and the yaw and roll angles between the planes.

RESULTS

The mean difference in distance between the planned osteotomy and performed osteotomy was 1.1 mm (STD 0.6 mm), the mean yaw was 1.8° (STD 1.4°), and mean roll was 1.6° (STD 1.3°).

CONCLUSION

The proposed EM navigated cutting guide for mandibular osteotomies demonstrated accurate positioning of the cutting plane according to the preoperative virtual surgical plan with respect to distance, yaw and roll angles. This novel approach has the potential to make the use of 3D-printed cutting guides obsolete, thereby decreasing the interval between diagnosis and surgery, reduce cost and allow for adaptation of the virtual plan in case of rapid tumor proliferation or unanticipated in situ deviations from the preoperative CT/MR imaging.