The diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of head and neck lymphoma: results in 226 patients

Uses and limitations of small-volume biopsies for the diagnosis of lymphoma

Although surgical biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of lymphoma, small-volume biopsies including fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy are increasingly being used as a first line diagnostic tool. Small-volume biopsies are safe, rapid and cost effective; however, diagnostic utility varies by lymphoma subtype. It is important for pathologists and clinicians to recognize both the strengths and limitations of such biopsies.

Enhancing lymphoma diagnosis on core needle biopsies: Integrating immunohistochemistry with flow cytometry

Image-guided core needle biopsies (IG-CNB) represent a minimally invasive approach for obtaining tissue in patients with lymphadenopathy and suspected lymphoma. Despite their utility, diagnostic challenges persist, with lower efficacy compared with excisional biopsies. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential utility of incorporation of flow cytometry (FC) alongside immunohistochemistry (IHC) when performing IG-CNB for suspected lymphoproliferative diseases. Analyzing 170 consecutive cases, guided by ultrasound (n = 94) or computer tomography (n = 76), we employed a diagnostic algorithm, already established in our laboratory practice, utilizing three antibody cocktail-equipped tubes tailored for defining lymphomas, particularly those of B-cell origin. FC expedited the diagnostic process, yielding presumptive results in 87.6% of cases within 48 h, with a positive predictive value of 98%. Addition of FC to routine IHC enhanced the diagnostic rate from 91.2% to 95.3%, reducing IG-CNB failure rate by 45%, from 8.8% to 4.7%. This enhancement was particularly notable for deep-seated sites and in the setting of suspected disease recurrences. Consequently, FC emerges as a valuable adjunctive tool, allowing for the improvement of diagnostic performance, with a particular focus on the ability to quantify the expression of surface markers for targeted therapies, and holding the potential to diminish the necessity for repeat excisional biopsies subsequent to IG-CNB procedures.

CT-guided core needle biopsies of head and neck tumors: a comprehensive monocenter analysis of safety and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although core needle biopsy is an important tool in minimally invasive tissue sampling and diagnostics for head and neck masses, comprehensive data about safety and outcomes is lacking.

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of head and neck masses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients from 04/2007 to 12/2021, and a total of 156 core needle biopsies were evaluated. The initial histopathological results were compared with the long-term final diagnosis to evaluate the diagnostic yield of CT-guided core needle biopsies. The patients' age, sex, and history of malignancy, as well as procedural complications and radiation exposure were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 156 biopsies of 150 patients (mean age 56 years ± 17; 89 men) were evaluated. 57.3% (86/150) of patients had a history of malignancy. 55.1% (86/156) of the lesions were accessed by an infrahyoid needle approach. 92.9% (145/156) of biopsies yielded conclusive results. There were no false positives and 4 false negatives, resulting in a total false negative rate of 2.7% (4/145) and a total diagnostic yield of 90.4% (141/156). There were nine puncture-related complications (9/156-5.7%). None of the complications required further reintervention. The average dose length product was 311.3 mGy × cm.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided core needle biopsies of head and neck masses showed excellent results with high diagnostic yield and clinical safety.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

General anesthesia for open biopsy carries a higher risk for elderly patients, and fine needle aspiration has a poor reputation in terms of its diagnostic yield. This study focuses on safety and diagnostic yield of CT-guided core needle biopsies.

KEY POINTS

• CT-guided core needle biopsy in head and neck tumors was a reliable and safe procedure. • The most common cause for an inconclusive biopsy result was a shortage of tissue collected during the biopsy. • During our study period of nearly 15 years, the radiation exposure of head and neck biopsies decreased.

Incorporation of ultrasound-guided core biopsy with flow cytometry to assist the diagnosis of cervical lymphoma

PURPOSE

The main purpose of surgery for cervical lymphoma is only for tissue sampling. To establish a patient-friendly diagnostic approach, we investigated the feasibility of ultrasound-guided core biopsy with flow cytometry in the patients with suspected cervical lymphoma.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited patients with suspected cervical lymphoma from Nov 2017 till Jan 2021 in a referral medical center and performed retrospective interpretation of the prospectively acquired data. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy as the tissue sampling approach for the targeted lesions was performed in all patients. The ultrasound-guided core biopsy samples were analyzed by immunohistochemical stains and flow cytometry. The sample quality and the rate of definite and decisive diagnosis obtained by ultrasound-guided core biopsy alone and ultrasound-guided core biopsy with flow cytometry were evaluated.

RESULTS

Total 81 consecutive patients were recruited for analysis. All ultrasound-guided core biopsy samples were qualified for analysis of pathology and flow cytometry. Pathologically, the diagnoses were definite and compatible with their flow cytometry results in 70 patients (86.42%). Either newly-diagnosed or recurrent cervical lymphoma/lymphoproliferative disorders with histologic transformation could be diagnosed by ultrasound-guided core biopsy with flow cytometry. Nine of the 11 patients with pathologically indefinite diagnosis became clinically decisive when flow cytometry was incorporated into the process, which improved the rate of decisive diagnosis to 98.77% (Odds ratio [95% CI]: 6.21 [1.28, 58.96]).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided core biopsy combined with flow cytometry is suggested to serve as the first-line and patient-friendly diagnostic approach for the patients with suspected cervical lymphoma.

Core Needle Biopsy in Lymphoma Diagnosis: The Diagnostic Performance and the Role of the Multidisciplinary Approach in the Optimization of Results

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies (CNBs) and surgical excisional biopsies (SEBs), samples of lymphoid proliferation from a single institution from 2013 to 2017 (N=476) were divided into groups of CNB (N=218) and SEB (N=258). The diagnostic accuracy of these samples was evaluated as a percentage of conclusive diagnosis, according to the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues . The contribution of clinical data, the assessment of sample adequacy by a pathologist during the procedure, the number and size of fragments, the needle gauge, the ancillary tests, and the type of lymphoid proliferation were also examined. The diagnostic accuracy of SEB was 97.3% and CNB 91.3% ( P =0.010). Additional factors considered essential for establishing the final diagnosis in some cases were: clinical information (20.6% CNB, 7.4% SEB; P <0.001); immunohistochemistry (96.3% CNB, 91.5% SEB; P =0.024); flow cytometry (12% CNB, 6.8% SEB; P =0.165); and other complementary tests (8.2% CNB, 17.3% SEB; P =0.058). Factors that did not influence performance were the evaluation of sample adequacy during the procedure, the number and size of fragments, and the needle gauge. Increased percentage of nondiagnostic CNB was observed in T-cell lymphomas (30%), followed by classic Hodgkin lymphoma (10.6%). The main limitation of CNB was the evaluation of morphologically heterogenous diseases. CNB is useful and safe in lymphoma diagnosis provided it is carried out by a team of experienced professionals. Having an interventional radiology team engaged with pathology is an essential component to achieve adequate rates of specific diagnoses in CNB specimens.

Lymph node excisions provide more precise lymphoma diagnoses than core biopsies: a French Lymphopath network survey

According to expert guidelines, lymph node surgical excision is the standard of care for lymphoma diagnosis. However, core needle biopsy (CNB) has become widely accepted as part of the lymphoma diagnostic workup over the past decades. The aim of this study was to present the largest multicenter inventory of lymph nodes sampled either by CNB or surgical excision in patients with suspected lymphoma and to compare their diagnostic performance in routine pathologic practice. We reviewed 32 285 cases registered in the French Lymphopath network, which provides a systematic expert review of all lymphoma diagnoses in France, and evaluated the percentage of CNB and surgical excision cases accurately diagnosed according to the World Health Organization classification. Although CNB provided a definitive diagnosis in 92.3% and seemed to be a reliable method of investigation for most patients with suspected lymphoma, it remained less conclusive than surgical excision, which provided a definitive diagnosis in 98.1%. Discordance rates between referral and expert diagnoses were higher on CNB (23.1%) than on surgical excision (21.2%; P = .004), and referral pathologists provided more cases with unclassified lymphoma or equivocal lesion through CNB. In such cases, expert review improved the diagnostic workup by classifying ∼90% of cases, with higher efficacy on surgical excision (93.3%) than CNB (81.4%; P < 10-6). Moreover, diagnostic concordance for reactive lesions was higher on surgical excision than CNB (P = .009). Overall, although CNB accurately diagnoses lymphoma in most instances, it increases the risk of erroneous or nondefinitive conclusions. This large-scale survey also emphasizes the need for systematic expert review in cases of lymphoma suspicion, especially in those sampled by using CNB.

Ultrasound-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of parotid neoplasia: an overview and update with a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Accurate diagnosis of parotid neoplasia is a key to determine the most appropriate patient management choice, including the need for surgery. This review provides an update of the literature on current practice and outcomes of parotid tissue sampling techniques, with an emphasis on ultrasound-guided core biopsy (USCB) and comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC).

METHODS

A literature review of EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted.

RESULTS

USCB has higher sensitivity, specificity and lower non-diagnostic rates than optimized FNAC. It also has a significantly higher sensitivity for the detection of malignancy. Significant complications post-USCB are uncommon, with only one reported case of tumour seeding and no cases of permanent facial nerve dysfunction. The technique is less operator-dependent than FNAC, with less reported variation in results between institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

USCB can be considered as the optimum tool of choice for the diagnosis of parotid neoplasia. This would particularly be the case in centres utilizing FNAC with high non-diagnostic rates or reduced diagnostic accuracy when compared to USCB published data, or in centres establishing a new service.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

An update of the role and outcomes of USCB in the diagnosis of parotid gland pathologies.Research shows that USCB preforms better than FNAC, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, particularly in the case of malignant neoplasia.Complications following USCB were found to be higher than that of FNAC; however, no long-term major complications following either method have been reported in the literature.

[Clinical features of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in head and neck]

Objective:To investigate the clinical features of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma （DLBCL） of head and neck. Methods:A retrospective study was conducted among patients with DLBCL in the Department of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from July 2011 to September 2021. The disease location, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of DLBCL patients in head and neck were analyzed retrospectively. Results:Oropharynx（27 cases, including 25 cases in tonsil）, neck（29 cases）, nasopharynx and nasal cavity （7 cases）were included in 63 cases of DLBCL in head and neck. Pharyngalgia, pharyngeal foreign body sensation and dysphagia were the most common manifestations of oropharyngeal DLBCL, while nasal obstruction, runny nose and hyposmia were the initial manifestations of nasal and nasopharyngeal DLBCL.Under the NBI endoscopy, locally uplifted neoplasm with rough surface mucosa was observed in 34 cases DLBCL patients of oropharynx, nasopharynx and nasal cavity. Among them, 16 cases were covered with yellow-white and patchy pseudomembrane on the surface of the neoplasm, and 5 cases were detected with abnormal new vessels, including 3 cases of tonsils, 1 case of root of tongue, and 1 case of nasopharynx. Painless progressive lymphadenectasis was the common manifestation of DLBCL in head and neck, and the maximum diameter（[21.3±6.7]mm） of neck lymph nodes in the same side of DLBCL was significantly larger than that in the opposite side（[16.0±7.2]mm, P=0.009）. Sixty-three cases of DLBCL in head and neck, including 27 cases of germinal center type（GCB）, 33 cases of nongerminal center type（non-GCB）, and 3 cases of non-specific DLBCL, were confirmed the diagnosis by needle biopsy（33 cases, 52.4%） and surgical resection（30 cases, 47.6%）. The imaging features of DLBCL in head and neck were mostly showed as local soft tissue masses with uniform density and uneven enhancement, and the surrounding structures were often compressed and displaced. All the patients were treated with standard R-CHOP chemotherapy regimens, and overall survival was longer in normal LDH, and overall survival of the patients at low risk of IPI was longer than those at medium-high or high risk of IPI（P_LDH=0.011, P_IPI=0.022, P<0.05）. Conclusion:DLBCL mainly occurs in oropharynx, especially the unilateral tonsil. When flake yellow-white pseudomembrane adhesion and abnormal neovessels on the surface of the mass are detected under endoscopy, and the ultrasound suggested multiple enlarged lymph nodes in the neck with large iplateral lymph nodes, the possibility of DLBCL should be considered. Surgical resection could be performed for diagnosis if necessary, and early diagnosis would have a better prognosis.

Image-guided core needle biopsy as the first-line diagnostic approach in lymphoproliferative disorders-A review of the current literature

The World Health Organization (WHO) and numerous expert guidelines for lymphoma diagnosis and subclassification advocate the use of histology from surgical nodal excision biopsy (SEB) over core needle biopsy (CNB) due to perceived higher diagnostic yield. CNB is associated with lower morbidity and is more cost-effective compared to SEB. Furthermore, current practice increasingly demonstrates material obtained from CNB can rapidly diagnose individuals with a clinical suspicion of lymphoma and allow initiation of treatment in the majority of patients. We performed a literature review to assess the suitability of CNB in lymphoma diagnosis given recent advances in radiological and histopathological techniques in obtaining and processing tissue. Additionally, expert international guidelines in lymphoma diagnosis were compared. We found that CNB demonstrated a diagnostic efficacy between 79% and 97% (median 91%) where the diagnostic outcome was conclusive with full lymphoma subclassification. Studies demonstrate that there is a high diagnostic reproducibility amongst haematopathologists (87%-93%) in lymphoma diagnoses with full subtyping from material obtained via CNB. Furthermore, CNB is a safe, rapid and reliable method of obtaining tissue from lymph nodes for histopathological analysis. These procedures are minimally invasive, well-tolerated and should be considered the first-line diagnostic approach in clinical practice in patients with suspected lymphoproliferative disorders.