Quality of life, chronic pain, insomnia, and jaw malfunction in patients after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a questionnaire-based pilot study

Is the risk of chronic pain after total temporomandibular joint replacement independent of its indications? A prospective cohort study

Chronic pain is a possible long-term complication after alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TMJR). This study was developed to evaluate various subjective and objective measurements to determine the presence and degree of TMJ pain in patients treated with TMJR regardless of the indication for the operation. A prospective, single-centre study was performed. Data on 36 patients (56 TMJR) were collected preoperatively and at follow up two to three years postoperatively. The primary outcome variable was subjective TMJ pain (none/mild, moderate/severe) at follow up. The predictor variables were objective pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) at the ipsilateral joint(s) and muscle(s), functional parameters (incisal range of motion, maximum voluntary clenching), subjective oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and demographic and surgical variables. The number of patients with moderate/severe pain decreased from 17 preoperatively to 10 at follow up. Self-reported TMJ pain was significantly reduced in the entire group (p = 0.001). Patients with moderate/severe pain at follow up were more restricted in their OHRQoL but did not differ in PPT and functional parameters from the no/mild pain group. Moderate/severe TMJ pain at follow up was associated with unilateral TMJR and more preoperative pain. This study provides preliminary evidence that despite good pain reduction in most patients, persistent pain after TMJR is common and, in rare cases, may even worsen regardless of the original diagnosis. At follow up there was a close relation between OHRQoL and TMJ pain. TMJ pain after TMJR cannot be confirmed by objective measurement methods (PPTs and functional parameters).

Functioning of the Masticatory System in Patients with an Alloplastic Total Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses Compared with Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Most patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) issues are successfully treated with nonsurgical methods. However, when end-stage TMJ pathologies occur, invasive management can be required, such as a total TMJ replacement. This cross-sectional pilot study aimed to provide insight into the functioning of the masticatory system, pain, and patient satisfaction in patients treated with a total joint replacement (TJR).

METHODS

A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted to determine the postoperative clinical results of an alloplastic TJR TMJ. Masticatory performance and also insight into maximum voluntary bite force (MVBF), active and passive maximum mouth opening (aMMO/pMMO), pain, and patient satisfaction were measured. Masticatory performance, MVBF, and aMMO of patients with a TJR TMJ were compared with healthy individuals.

RESULTS

Masticatory performance is equal between patients with a TJR TMJ and healthy individuals, but both MVBF and aMMO were significantly smaller in patients with a TJR TMJ. However, patients had almost no pain and were very satisfied with the TJR TMJ treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that most patients with an alloplastic TJR TMJ were able to function without pain, showed good masticatory performance, and were highly satisfied with their alloplastic TJR TMJ. However, MVBF and aMMO were lower than in healthy individuals.

Outcomes of total joint alloplastic reconstruction in TMJ ankylosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate subjective and objective outcomes in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis treated with TMJ alloplastic reconstruction (TMJR).

STUDY DESIGN

All patients diagnosed with TMJ ankylosis that underwent TMJR at our institution between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: bony and fibrous ankylosis. Subjective variables assessed were facial pain and headaches, TMJ pain, jaw function, diet, and disability. Objective variables assessed were maximum interincisal opening and lateral excursions. The Mann-Whitney test was employed to analyze subjective variables and an unpaired t-test was used to analyze the objective variables. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (21 female, 7 male). The mean age at the time of surgery was 42 years, and the mean number of prior TMJ surgeries was 3. A total of 52 TMJRs were performed in the 28 patients, and the mean follow-up time was 46 months. All subjective variables were significantly improved, and the mean maximum interincisal opening increased from 16.9 mm to 37.25 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study demonstrate that TMJR is an effective and reliable method for the management of both fibrous and bony TMJ ankylosis.