A change in surgical margin: do wider surgical margins lead to decreased rates of local recurrence in T1 and T2 oral tongue cancer?

A Matter of Margins in Oral Cancer-How Close Is Enough?

In patients with oral cancer, the risk factors for local, regional, and distant recurrence according to margin status have not been well established. We aimed to determine the risk factors for recurrence by margin status and to identify a margin cut-off point for improved survival in patients with close margins. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients treated at our centre from 2009 to 2021 for primary oral cancer. Margins were classified as positive (<1 mm), close (1 to 4.9 mm), or clear (>5 mm). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 326 patients (210 men) were included. The mean age was 59.1 years. Margin status was close (n = 168, 51.5%), clear (n = 83, 25.4%), or positive (n = 75, 23.0%). In the univariate analysis, positive surgical margins (HR = 7.53) had the greatest impact on distant failure. Positive surgical margins-without nodal involvement-had the greatest impact on the risk of distant failure. In the close margin group, the optimal cut-off for disease-free survival (AUC = 0.58) and overall survival (AUC = 0.63) was a deep margin > 3 mm, with survival outcomes that were comparable to the clear margin group. These finding suggest that margins < 5 mm may be sufficient in certain well-defined cases. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Predictive factors and repetition numbers for intraoperative additional resection of initially involved soft tissue resection margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative additional resection (IAR) of initially microscopically involved soft tissue resection margins negatively impacts tumor recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Increasing the selected initial macroscopic resection margin distance beyond the tumor tissue may help prevent IAR; however, the existence of predictive factors for IAR and IAR repetition numbers remains unclear. This study aimed to identify predictive factors for IAR and to evaluate the IAR repetition numbers in soft tissue for surgically treated OSCC.

METHODS

A cohort of 197 patients surgically treated for OSCC between 2008 and 2019 was retrospectively reviewed (44 patients with IAR and 153 patients without IAR). Clinical parameters (tumor location, midline involvement, clinical T-status, time between staging imaging and surgery, bone resection, monopolar use, and reconstruction flap size) and histopathological parameters (pathologic T-status [pT-status], grading, vascular invasion, and lymphatic invasion) of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with and without IAR differed in their histopathological parameters, such as pT-status above 2 (47.7% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.014) and lymphatic invasion (13.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.033); however, their clinical parameters were similar (all p > 0.05). Only pT-status above 2 was predictive for IAR in a multivariable regression analysis (odds ratio 2.062 [confidence interval 1.008-4.221], p = 0.048). The IAR repetition numbers varied from zero to two (zero = 84.4%, one = 11.4%, and two = 2.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Only postoperative available pT-status was identified as a predictive factor for IAR, underscoring the importance of improving preoperative or intraoperative tumor visualization in OSCC before selecting the initial macroscopic resection margin distance to avoid IAR.

Stratification of surgical margin distances by the millimeter on local recurrence in oral cavity cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

There are limited data supporting the commonly suggested 5 mm margin cutoff as the optimum value in defining clear margins in oral cancer. A database search of Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost was performed from inception to June 2022. A random-effects model was chosen for this meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed throughout this study. Seven studies met study criteria (2215 patients). The risk ratio was significantly higher for margins <5 mm when compared to those ≥5 mm (2.09 (95%CI: 1.53-2.86, I2  = 0.47)). Subgroup analysis (I2  = 0.15) of margin distances of 0.0-0.9, 1.0-1.9, 2.0-2.9, 3.0-3.9, and 4.0-4.9 mm calculated risk ratios for local recurrence of 2.96, 2.01, 2.17, 1.8, and 0.98, respectively. Margins between 4.0 and 4.9 mm had similar risk ratios for local recurrence compared to ≥5 mm, while margins <4.0 were significantly higher.

The prognostic role of sex and hemoglobin levels in patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Women and men differ genetically, biologically (sex) and by social construct (gender), possibly impacting on prognostic factors in predicting cancer survival. Hemoglobin levels and immune system activation are players acting in this scenario which could play a role in partly determining prognosis between patients of different sex/gender (S/G). Here, we investigate these factors in patients affected by tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

This is an observational retrospective cohort study. We collected tongue cancer patients' clinical data, including hemoglobin levels and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between women and men considering confounding and prognostic factors in multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Stratified analyses were also conducted by sex and tumor stage.

Result

576 patients, 39.9% women and 60.1% men, were found eligible for the analysis. Men were more often smokers (p<0.001), alcohol consumers (p<0.001), overweight or obese (p<0.001) and undergoing radiotherapy (p=0.002). In multivariate models for stage I-II, men showed half risk of death and relapse compared to women (HR=0.44; 95%CI 0.24-0.81, p=0.009; HR=0.55; 95%CI 0.34-0.87, p=0.01, for OS and DFS respectively). Moreover, low hemoglobin levels appeared to be an independent prognostic factor for women but not for men in terms of both OS and DFS. Specifically, women with low hemoglobin levels showed a worse tumor outcome (HR=2.66; 95%CI 1.50-4.70; HR=2.09; 95%CI 1.24-3.53, for OS and DFS respectively). Low hemoglobin levels appeared to be a poor OS prognostic factor for women at stage I-II (p<0.004) but not for men (p=0.10). Women with advanced stage tumors, NLR>2.37, who did not performed Radiotherapy and with depth of invasion (DOI)> 10 were associated with a significant increase in relapse and death (all p<0.05).

Conclusion

In our cohort of patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma, men present better OS and DFS than women with early stages tumors. Low hemoglobin level was an independent prognostic factor for women, especially at early-stage tumors. For advanced stages (III-IV), sex is not a significant factor related to patients' prognosis.