Use of the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase protocol in the management of impending skin necrosis associated with hyaluronic acid fillers: a systematic review

Comparison of the effects of submucosal hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection following impacted third molar surgery

BACKGROUND

Limiting postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection is crucial for smooth healing. This prospective, controlled clinical trial investigated and compared the effectiveness of dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in relieving these complications.

METHODS

In groups Ia and IIa, 8 mg of dexamethasone and 150 IU of hyaluronidase were administered following the removal of impacted teeth, respectively. The contralateral sides (groups Ib and IIb) were determined as control groups. Edema, pain, trismus, and infection were clinically evaluated on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days.

RESULTS

60 patients were enrolled in the study. Hyaluronidase provided significantly more edema relief than dexamethasone on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days (P = 0.031, 0.002, 0.000, and 0.009, respectively). No statistical difference was found between dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in VAS and rescue analgesic intake amount values for all time points. Hyaluronidase was more effective in reducing trismus than dexamethasone on the 2nd and 3rd postoperative days (P = 0.029, 0.024, respectively). Neither of the agents significantly increased the postoperative infection rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyaluronidase can be selected when postoperative excessive edema and trismus are anticipated. Dexamethasone may be a cost-effective option if postoperative pain control is merely targeted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Protocol Registration and Results System (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT05466604) on 20/07/2022.

Subcutaneous injection of hyaluronic acid leading to emboliom and recanalization process monitored in real time by three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging

This study describes a method for real-time examination of the microvascular system based on the three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging system to prevent arterial complications, especially vascular embolism, during hyaluronic acid (HA) injections. Chicken embryos were used to simulate the superficial blood vessels of human skin, and then the target area was imaged by the photoacoustic imaging system for three-dimensional vascular imaging, and then the syringe and blood vessels were monitored, and the syringe angle and penetration depth were adjusted in time using an injection device to avoid puncturing the arterial vasculature and clogging the blood vessels. HA was then injected into smaller vessels on the dorsum of the tongue in mice and into thicker vessels on the dorsal portion of the tongue in rats to mimic embolization, and the post-operative recovery was reflected by the changes in the pixel dots of the extracted part of the blocked blood vessels, and it was observed that the blood flow in the area of the fine vessels was restored in about 3 days, whereas blood flow in the area of the large vessels was restored in only about 1 h. The method presented in this paper allows precise guidance of injectable filler HA, which has good application prospects in improving the safety of injection micro-plastic surgery and reducing the experience requirements for medical personnel.

Retrospective Study of Vascular Complications Caused by Hyaluronic Acid Injection

BACKGROUND

Complications from intravascular embolization of hyaluronic acid (HA) are not only no longer uncommon but also devastating. This study aimed to examine clinical aspects of patients referred to our hospital for care following complications from intravascular filler embolization.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from all patients referred to our medical center for the management of complications associated with intravascular embolization of HA fillers including demographics, medical history, clinical features, and treatment between November 2013 and June 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients with vascular complications (27 cases with vision loss and 89 cases with skin necrosis) were assessed. The highest risk injection sites for skin necrosis included the nasal region (58/115, 50.4%), temple (16/115, 13.9%), and forehead (11/115, 9.6%) and for vision loss included the nasal region (18/30, 60.0%) and forehead (7/30, 23.3%). In skin necrosis cases, a needle (60/89, 67.4%) carried a higher risk than that of a cannula (29/89, 32.6%), whereas in vision loss cases, nasal dorsum injections using a cannula (16/27, 59.3%) carried a higher risk than that observed using a needle (11/27, 40.7%). No treatment was completely successful in reversing these complications.

CONCLUSION

Intravascular embolization of HA filler is a serious complication. Although some combination treatments have been proposed, there is no standard protocol for treating severe complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Acute diplopia after glabellar hyaluronic acid filler injection

Purpose

Blindness is a well-known complication of filler injection in the glabellar region. Acute diplopia from filler injection without vision loss is a rare complication that typically results in clinical ophthalmoplegia which can have permanent sequelae. Here, we describe a patient who presented with acute diplopia with grossly intact full extraocular motility after glabella hyaluronic acid filler injection that resolved after 1 month.

Observations

A previously healthy 43-year-old woman underwent her first hyaluronic acid injection in the glabella and developed immediate binocular double vision with severe pain and skin mottling above her right eyebrow and central forehead. Hyaluronidase injections, nitroglycerin paste, and aspirin were immediately administered. On exam, there was significant skin mottling over the glabella, extending to the forehead and nose with a small incomitant horizontal and vertical misalignment. No changes to her vision were observed and extraocular motility was grossly full. The rest of her exam was unremarkable. Over the course of the following month, the patient's diplopia resolved, but she developed skin necrosis and scarring.

Conclusions

Importance: Proper knowledge of facial and periocular anatomy is critical for practitioners to safely perform filler injections and manage potential complications. Patients should be counseled about the potential rare risks of these elective procedures.