Characterization of the pharmacokinetics of a liposomal formulation of eribulin mesylate (E7389) in mice

Navigating the Clinical Landscape of Liposomal Therapeutics in Cancer Treatment

Liposome-based targeted drug delivery systems represent a significant advancement in pharmaceutical science, offering distinct advantages that enhance the efficacy and safety of various therapies. These versatile carriers can encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs, making them particularly valuable in clinical settings. This review explores the critical role of liposomal formulations in improving drug pharmacokinetics and minimizing side effects, especially in oncology, where targeted delivery to tumor cells is essential. Outlining the properties of different types of liposomes, we focus on the effects of these properties on the liposomes' targeting and drug release capabilities through innovative surface modifications and describe the most common methods of liposome preparation and characterization. Furthermore, this review provides an in-depth analysis of the properties and composition of liposomal-based nanocarriers, with a unique focus on ongoing clinical trials and recently approved therapies. It offers a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in pre-clinical research and highlights the critical progress in clinical development, offering insights into the clinical impact and regulatory approvals. Ultimately, this review underscores the transformative potential of liposomal nanocarriers in modern therapeutics, suggesting avenues for future innovations and clinical breakthroughs.

Phase 1b/2 study of the liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF) in combination with nivolumab: Results from the phase 2 esophageal cancer cohort

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in Japan. Herein, we report the efficacy and safety of E7389-LF plus the immune checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab, from the esophageal cancer cohort of the phase 2 part of Study 120.

METHODS

Eligible patients received E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 360 mg intravenously Q3W. The primary objective was to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR); other objectives included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 35 Japanese patients enrolled, 7 (20.0%) had a partial response as their best overall response, and 14 (40.0%) had stable disease. The ORR was 20.0% (95% CI 8.4-36.9). The duration of response was 5.6 months (95% CI 1.7-not estimable [NE]). The median PFS was 2.81 months (95% CI 1.31-4.17). The median OS was not reached (95% CI 6.54 months-NE). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (65.7%), pyrexia (60.0%), and leukopenia (57.1%). Select plasma endothelial cell markers levels increased from day 1 of cycle 1 and changes were pronounced between days 8-15 of each cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

E7389-LF plus nivolumab showed antitumor activity in patients with unresectable and pretreated esophageal cancer and should be evaluated further in a broader population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04078295.

Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort

PURPOSE

E7389-LF is a liposomal formulation of the microtubule dynamics inhibitor eribulin and has shown preliminary efficacy in the treatment of gastric cancer. Study 120, a phase Ib/II open-label study, assessed efficacy and safety of E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab, a programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor. This report focuses on the gastric cancer cohort within the expansion phase.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had unresectable, measurable gastric cancer, progression following a platinum drug plus fluoropyrimidine (1L), and a taxane-containing regimen (2L). The primary objective of the expansion phase was objective response rate, secondary objectives included safety and PFS, and exploratory objectives included overall survival and biomarker evaluation. Patients received E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 in combination with nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks, both as intravenous infusions. Tumor responses were assessed every 6 weeks by the investigators per RECIST v1.1. Plasma and tumor biomarkers were assessed.

RESULTS

In the 31 patients who received E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab, the objective response rate was 25.8% [confidence interval (CI), 11.9-44.6]. The median progression-free survival was 2.69 months (95% CI, 1.91-2.99) and median overall survival was 7.85 months (95% CI, 4.47-not estimable). The most common treatment-related TEAE of any grade were neutropenia (77.4%), leukopenia (74.2%), and decreased appetite (51.6%). E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab significantly increased CD8-positive cells at C2D1 (P = 0.039), and six of seven vascular markers and four IFNγ-related markers showed increases from C1D1.

CONCLUSIONS

Promising antitumor activity was observed with E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab in patients with gastric cancer, and no new safety signals were observed, compared with either monotherapy.

Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort

PURPOSE

E7389-LF is a liposomal formulation of eribulin that contributes to tumor vascular remodeling. The phase II part of this phase Ib/II study assessed the efficacy/safety of E7389-LF in combination with nivolumab in several disease cohorts; herein, we report results from the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cohort.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with unresectable/measurable SCLC and disease progression with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with/without an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) were enrolled to receive E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 360 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary objective of this part was to assess the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included assessments of safety and progression-free survival (PFS); exploratory assessments included overall survival (OS) and biomarkers.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled. By the data cut-off date (May 31, 2022), 29 (85.3%) had discontinued. Efficacy/biomarker analyses included 33 patients (1 had their diagnosis changed postenrollment); the ORR of E7389-LF plus nivolumab was 24.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.1-42.3], the median PFS was 3.98 months (95% CI: 2.63-4.40), and, at a median follow-up of 10.6 months, the median OS was not reached (95% CI: not estimable). Notably, 27 of 33 patients (81.8%) had received an ICI as their prior first-line therapy. Treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 97.1% (any grade) and 82.4% (grade ≥3) of enrolled patients; the most common event was neutropenia. Changes in vascular and immune-related plasma markers were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 in combination with nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks showed notable antitumor activity as second-line therapy for SCLC; no new safety signals were observed compared with either agent as monotherapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

This phase II part of a phase Ib/II study assessed liposomal eribulin (E7389-LF) plus nivolumab in 34 patients with pretreated SCLC; 8 of 33 evaluable patients (including 6/27 pretreated with ICIs) had objective responses. The combination was tolerable; increases in vasculature-related biomarkers tended to correlate with responses.

Phase Ib/II Study of a Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) plus Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from Phase Ib

Purpose

To determine a recommended dose of liposomal eribulin (E7389-LF) in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors, and to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker impact of this regimen.

Experimental Design

Japanese patients with advanced, nonresectable, or recurrent solid tumors and no existing alternative standard/effective therapy (except nivolumab monotherapy) were assigned to either E7389-LF 1.7 mg/m² plus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks, E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m² plus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks, E7389-LF 1.1 mg/m² plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks, or E7389-LF 1.4 mg/m² plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety/tolerability of each dose cohort and to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary/exploratory objectives, including safety [dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and adverse events (AE)], pharmacokinetics, efficacy [including objective response rate (ORR)], and biomarker results were used in determining the RP2D.

Results

Twenty-five patients were enrolled to treatment [E7389-LF 1.7 mg/mg² every 3 weeks (n = 6), E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m² every 3 weeks (n = 6), E7389-LF 1.1 mg/m² every 2 weeks (n = 7), E7389-LF 1.4 mg/m² every 2 weeks (n = 6)]. Twenty-four patients were evaluated for DLTs, of whom 3 had DLTs (1 at E7389-LF 1.7 mg/m² every 3 weeks, 1 at 1.1 mg/m² every 2 weeks, and 1 at 1.4 mg/m² every 2 weeks). All patients had ≥1 treatment-related treatment-emergent AE (TEAE); 68.0% had ≥1 grade 3-4 treatment-related TEAE. Changes in vasculature and IFN-related biomarkers were seen in each cohort. The overall ORR was 16%.

Conclusions

E7389-LF plus nivolumab was tolerable overall; the recommended dose for future study was 2.1 mg/m² plus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks.

Significance

This phase Ib part of a phase Ib/II study assessed the tolerability and activity of a liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF) plus nivolumab in 25 patients with advanced solid tumors. The combination was tolerable overall; 4 patients had a partial response. Vasculature and immune-related biomarker levels increased, suggesting vascular remodeling.

Liposomal eribulin for advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, and small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In this open-label, Phase 1 study, we explore the safety and efficacy of E7389-LF (liposomal formulation of eribulin) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

This open-label, Phase 1 study enrolled Japanese adult patients to receive E7389-LF for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Treatment with E7389-LF 2.0 mg/m² every 3 weeks (previously determined maximum tolerated dose) was tested for the treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, or small lung cell cancer in the expansion part of this study. Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate, best overall response, and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

As of October 16, 2020, 43 patients were enrolled (adenoid cystic carcinoma, n = 12; gastric cancer, n = 10; esophageal cancer, n = 11; small cell lung cancer, n = 10). Thirty-three patients experienced a Grade ≥3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event, most commonly neutropenia (53.5%). Additionally, the incidence of hypersensitivity did not appear to change with a reduced number of infusion steps (2 vs. 4) and patients who were administered prophylactic pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor had a noticeably lower incidence of Grade 3-4 neutropenia (although this did not have a proper control). The overall objective response rate was 11.6% (95% confidence interval: 3.9-25.1), corresponding to two partial responses in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma, two partial responses in gastric cancer, and one partial response in esophageal cancer. Median progression-free survival was longer in the adenoid cystic carcinoma population (16.6 months) than in others.

CONCLUSIONS

E7389-LF 2.0 mg/m² every 3 weeks was well tolerated for the treatment of several different tumor types, and larger studies in these populations are warranted.

Dose Escalation Data from the Phase 1 Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Japanese Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

We report the dose-escalation part of a phase I study of liposomal eribulin (E7389-LF) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors and no alternative standard therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients ≥20 years old were enrolled. E7389-LF doses of 1.0 to 1.5 mg/m2 once every two weeks (Q2W) or 1.0 to 2.5 mg/m2 once every three weeks (Q3W) were planned. The primary objective was to determine the MTD by evaluating dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary objectives included safety/tolerability assessments, objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival; serum biomarker assessment was an exploratory objective.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled and treated; 12 in the Q3W group (1.0 mg/m2, n = 3; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 3; 2.0 mg/m2, n = 6) and 9 in the Q2W group (1.0 mg/m2, n=3; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 6). The Q3W and Q2W MTDs were 2.0 mg/m2 and 1.5 mg/m2, respectively. One patient receiving 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W had a DLT of grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (66.7% in Q3W and Q2W) and leukopenia (Q3W, 58.3%; Q2W, 33.3%). One patient in the Q3W group (2.0 mg/m2) and 3 in the Q2W group (1.0 mg/m2, n = 1; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 2) achieved a partial response [overall ORR, 19.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.4-41.9]. Endothelial [TEK receptor tyrosine kinase (TEK), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3), platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM1)], vasculature (collagen IV), and immune-related [interferon gamma (IFNγ), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11 (CXCL11), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10)] biomarker levels were increased.

CONCLUSIONS

E7389-LF was well tolerated at 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W. Considering the toxicity profile of both regimens, the recommended dose was 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W. Expansion cohorts are ongoing.

Efficacy of Eribulin in Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas are a highly heterogenous group of tumors with limited systemic therapy options. Eribulin, a synthetic analogue of halichondrin B, is a potent mitotic inhibitor. A phase 3 trial of previously treated advanced Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma demonstrated superiority of eribulin to dacarbazine. Eribulin appears to be particularly effective for liposarcomas. It has also been shown to be a safe and effective treatment alternative to doxorubicin in patients where doxorubicin is contraindicated. From retrospective studies, eribulin has demonstrated efficacy in patients with angiosarcoma, pleomorphic sarcomas, synovial sarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, angiosarcomas, and myxofibrosarcomas. Future areas of development include liposomal eribulin, which may provide increased efficacy and lower toxicity, and delineation of biomarkers of response and resistance, allowing better selection of patients for treatment.

A separate assay of released and liposomal encapsulated eribulin in dog plasma by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry for its application to a pharmacokinetic study

Eribulin has been used as a drug for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF) is under development to achieve a wider therapeutic index. It is important to separately determine released and encapsulated drugs in a systemic circulation for liposomal drugs. In this study, a separate assay method was developed for the determination of released and total (encapsulated+released) eribulin concentrations in dog plasma by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The released eribulin in dog plasma was separated by ultrafiltration of plasma samples. Obtained plasma ultrafiltrate and untreated plasma samples recognized as released and total eribulin, respectively, were subjected to protein precipitation for extraction of eribulin. Eribulin was quantifiable from 0.1 ng/mL. Accuracy and precision of eribulin in both matrices were within ±15% and 15%, respectively, indicating a robust assay. Released and total eribulin concentrations in plasma were determined after intravenous administration of E7389-LF to dogs, resulting in minimal released eribulin in plasma. In conclusion, a robust method for released and total eribulin levels in dog plasma was developed and was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in dogs to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cancer nanotechnology: current status and perspectives

Modern medicine has been waging a war on cancer for nearly a century with no tangible end in sight. Cancer treatments have significantly progressed, but the need to increase specificity and decrease systemic toxicities remains. Early diagnosis holds a key to improving prognostic outlook and patient quality of life, and diagnostic tools are on the cusp of a technological revolution. Nanotechnology has steadily expanded into the reaches of cancer chemotherapy, radiotherapy, diagnostics, and imaging, demonstrating the capacity to augment each and advance patient care. Nanomaterials provide an abundance of versatility, functionality, and applications to engineer specifically targeted cancer medicine, accurate early-detection devices, robust imaging modalities, and enhanced radiotherapy adjuvants. This review provides insights into the current clinical and pre-clinical nanotechnological applications for cancer drug therapy, diagnostics, imaging, and radiation therapy.

Quantitative Multiplex Immunofluorescence Evaluation of the Tumor Microenvironment in Pretreatment Tumors of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer and Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Treated with Liposomal Eribulin

Eribulin inhibits microtubule polymerization and suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Conventional pathology approaches have not identified a precise predictive biomarker for Eribulin. We performed qmIF on pre-treatment tissue from 11 patients (6 TNBC, 5 HGSOC) treated with Eribulin-LF. T-lymphocytes were the dominant immune-subset in TME, with higher levels detected in stroma vs tumor (9% vs 2%). Greater density of CD3+ (p = 0.01) and CD3 + CD8+ (p = 0.03) cells and closer proximity between CD3 + CD8+ and tumor cells was observed in the patients with disease control (PR + SD) vs. progressive disease. QmIF identified an association between TIL infiltration and Eribulin-LF sensitivity, which should be evaluated further in prospective studies.

Vinca alkaloids, thalidomide and eribulin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: From pathogenesis to treatment

Vinca alkaloids, thalidomide, and eribulin are widely used to treat patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), adults affected by multiple myeloma and locally invasive or metastatic breast cancer, respectively. However, soon after their introduction into clinical practice, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) emerged as their main non-hematological and among dose-limiting adverse events. It is generally perceived that vinca alkaloids and the antiangiogenic agent thalidomide are more neurotoxic, compared to eribulin. The exposure to these chemotherapeutic agents is associated with an axonal, length-dependent, sensory polyneuropathy of mild to moderate severity, whereas it is considered that the peripheral nerve damage, unless severe, usually resolves soon after treatment discontinuation. Advanced age, high initial and prolonged dosing, coadministration of other neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and pre-existing neuropathy are the common risk factors. Pharmacogenetic biomarkers might be used to define patients at increased susceptibility of CIPN. Currently, there is no established therapy for CIPN prevention or treatment; symptomatic treatment for neuropathic pain and dose reduction or withdrawal in severe cases is considered, at the cost of reduced cancer therapeutic efficacy. This review critically examines the pathogenesis, epidemiology, risk factors (both clinical and pharmacogenetic), clinical phenotype and management of CIPN as a result of exposure to vinca alkaloids, thalidomide and its analogue lenalidomide as also eribulin.

Phase 1 dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of eribulin-liposomal formulation in patients with solid tumours

BACKGROUND

This phase 1 study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of eribulin-liposomal formulation (eribulin-LF) in patients with advanced solid tumours.

METHODS

Eligible patients with ECOG PS 0-1 were treated with eribulin-LF either on day 1 every 21 days (Schedule 1), or on days 1 and 15 every 28 days (Schedule 2). Doses ranged from 1.0 to 3.5 mg/m2, with dose escalation in a 3 + 3 design. The dose-expansion phase evaluated eribulin-LF in select tumour types.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose/schedule of eribulin-LF.

RESULTS

Totally, 58 patients were enroled (median age = 62 years). The MTD was 1.4 mg/m2 (Schedule 1) or 1.5 mg/m2 (Schedule 2), the latter dose selected for the dose-expansion phase. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLTs) in Schedule 1: hypophosphatemia and increased transaminase levels. DLTs in Schedule 2: stomatitis, increased alanine aminotransferase, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The pharmacokinetic profile of eribulin-LF showed a similar half-life to that of eribulin (~30 h), but with a 5-fold greater maximum serum concentration and a 40-fold greater area-under-the-curve. Eribulin-LF demonstrated clinical activity with approximately 10% of patients in both schedules achieving partial responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Eribulin-LF was well tolerated with a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. Preliminary evidence of clinical activity in solid tumours was observed.

Investigation of the Discriminatory Ability of Pharmacokinetic Metrics for the Bioequivalence Assessment of PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to construct a population pharmacokinetic model for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and use the final model to investigate the discrimination performance of pharmacokinetic metrics (e.g., C_max, AUC and partial AUC) of various analytes (e.g., liposome encapsulated doxorubicin, free doxorubicin and total doxorubicin) for the identification of formulation differences by means of Monte Carlo simulations.

METHODS

A model was simultaneously built to characterize the concentration time profiles of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and free doxorubicin using NONMEM. The different scenarios associated with changes in release rate (Rel) were simulated based on the final parameters. 500 simulated virtual bioequivalence (BE) studies were performed for each scenario, and power curves for the probability of declaring BE were also computed.

RESULTS

The concentration time profiles of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and free doxorubicin were well described by a one- and two-compartment model, respectively. pAUC_0-24 h and pAUC_0-48 h of free doxorubicin was most responsive to changes in the Rel when the Rel (test)/Rel (reference) ratios decreased. In contrast, when the Rel (test) increased, AUC_0-t of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin was the most responsive metric.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the traditional metrics, partial AUC should be included for the BE assessment of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.

Eribulin in Cancer Treatment

Halichondrin B is a complex, natural, polyether macrolide derived from marine sponges. Eribulin is a structurally-simplified, synthetic, macrocyclic ketone analogue of Halichondrin B. Eribulin was approved by United States Food and Drug Administration in 2010 as a third-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients who have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. It has a unique microtubule dynamics inhibitory action. Phase III studies have either been completed or are currently ongoing in breast cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. Phase I and II studies in multiple cancers and various combinations are currently ongoing. This article reviews the available information on eribulin with respect to its clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, mechanism of action, metabolism, preclinical studies, and with special focus on clinical trials.

Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Currently available therapies are inadequate and spur demand for improved technologies. Rapid growth in nanotechnology towards the development of nanomedicine products holds great promise to improve therapeutic strategies against cancer. Nanomedicine products represent an opportunity to achieve sophisticated targeting strategies and multi-functionality. They can improve the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of conventional therapeutics and may thus optimize the efficacy of existing anti-cancer compounds. In this review, we discuss state-of-the-art nanoparticles and targeted systems that have been investigated in clinical studies. We emphasize the challenges faced in using nanomedicine products and translating them from a preclinical level to the clinical setting. Additionally, we cover aspects of nanocarrier engineering that may open up new opportunities for nanomedicine products in the clinic.

Study on integrated pharmacokinetics of gardenia acid and geniposide: time-antioxidant efficacy after oral administration of Huanglian-Zhizi couplet medicine from Huang-Lian-Jie-Du-Tang in MCAO rats

Huanglian-Zhizi couplet medicine comes from classical prescription Huang-Lian-Jie-Du-Tang (HLJDT), which has been proven by previous researches to be an effective compound for cerebral ischemia. This paper explores the integrated pharmacokinetics of gardenia acid and geniposide-time-antioxidant efficacy after the oral administration of Huanglian-Zhizi couplet medicine from HLJDT in rats with middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). To investigate the differences in pharmacokinetics and antioxidant effect of Huanglian-Zhizi and HLJDT in MCAO rats, which have been scarcely reported, an oral dose, 24 crud drug g/kg, of Huanglian-Zhizi and 40 crud drug/kg of HLJDT were administered in two groups of normal rats and two groups of Sprague-Dawley (SD) MCAO rats, respectively. At different time points, concentrations of gardenia acid and geniposide were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were calculated by ELIASA. Pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC, MRT, t1/2, T max , C max were estimated by statistical moment analysis using a data analysis system (DAS) 2.0. An AUC based on weighting approach was used for integrating gardenia acid and geniposide. Finally, the concentration-time efficacy profiles were obtained. The integrated pharmacokinetics profiles of index components could reveal the pharmacokinetics behavior of Huanglian-Zhizi and HLJDT, corresponding to the antioxidant efficacy.