Biodegradable drug-eluting pellets provide steady and sustainable cisplatin release in the intrapleural cavity: In vivo and in vitro studies

Intracavitary Therapeutics for Pleural Malignancies

Pleural malignancies remain a serious therapeutic challenge, and are frequently refractory to standard treatment; however, they have the advantage of occurring in an enclosed cavity readily accessible for examination, biopsy, and serial sampling. Novel therapeutics can be administered via intracavitary delivery to maximize efficacy by targeting the site of involvement and potentially mitigating the adverse effects of systemic therapies. The easy accessibility of the pleural space lends itself well to repeated sampling and analysis to determine efficacy and toxicity of a given treatment paradigm. These factors support the rationale for delivery of novel therapeutics directly into the pleural space.

Fosfomycin Addition to Poly(D,L-Lactide) Coating Does Not Affect Prophylaxis Efficacy in Rat Implant-Related Infection Model, But That of Gentamicin Does

Gentamicin is the preferred antimicrobial agent used in implant coating for the prevention of implant-related infections (IRI). However, the present heavy local and systemic administration of gentamicin can lead to increased resistance, which has made its future use uncertain, together with related preventive technologies. Fosfomycin is an alternative antimicrobial agent that lacks the cross-resistance presented by other classes of antibiotics. We evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis of 10% fosfomycin-containing poly(D,L-lactide) (PDL) coated K-wires in a rat IRI model and compared it with uncoated (Control 1), PDL-coated (Control 2), and 10% gentamicin-containing PDL-coated groups with a single layer of coating. Stainless steel K-wires were implanted and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300) suspensions (103 CFU/10 μl) were injected into a cavity in the left tibiae. Thereafter, K-wires were removed and cultured in tryptic soy broth and then 5% sheep blood agar mediums. Sliced sections were removed from the tibiae, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and semi-quantitatively evaluated with X-rays. The addition of fosfomycin into PDL did not affect the X-ray and histopathological evaluation scores; however, the addition of gentamicin lowered them. The addition of gentamicin showed a protective effect after the 28th day of X-ray evaluations. PDL-only coating provided no protection, while adding fosfomycin to PDL offered a 20% level protection and adding gentamicin offered 80%. Furthermore, there were 103 CFU level growths in the gentamicin-added group, while the other groups had 105. Thus, the addition of fosfomycin to PDL does not affect the efficacy of prophylaxis, but the addition of gentamicin does. We therefore do not advise the use of fosfomycin as a single antimicrobial agent in coating for IRI prophylaxis.

In vivo pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution investigation of sustained-release cisplatin implants in the normal esophageal submucosa of 12 beagle dogs

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to clarify the pharmacokinetic, tissue distribution, hematologic, and histopathologic characteristics of sustained-release cisplatin from implants [CDDP-nanoparticle (NP) implants].

METHODS

Eighteen dogs (six hybrids and twelve beagles) were divided into three groups. In Group A, the six hybrid dogs were intravenously administered 20 mg CDDP via a hind limb vein. In Groups B and C, CDDP-NP implants containing CDDP doses of 40 and 60 mg, respectively, were embedded into the esophageal submucosa of beagles via painless gastroscopy with an endoscopic booster. Graphite frameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry was used to measure total platinum in plasma and tissues at various timepoints. In addition, free platinum levels in Group B were determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Toxicologic evaluation was also conducted.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic results indicated that the CDDP-NP implant could achieve a smooth pharmacokinetic curve, with the plasma invalid concentration reached after almost 480 h, which is approximately ten times longer than that of standard CDDP (48 h). The peak time, peak concentration, clearance, elimination half-life, area under the curve, volume of distribution at steady state, and mean residence time of Groups B and C were 494 and 211, 0.39 and 0.42, 0.044 and 0.059, 80.11 and 87.70, 44 and 49, 38.8 and 57.9, and 12.29 and 12.39 times those of Group A, respectively (all P < 0.05). The ratio of free/total platinum concentration was 2.0-3.1% in plasma, 14.2% in liver tissue, and 14.3% in kidney tissue. Tissue distribution studies showed that the highest platinum concentrations were found in the esophagus, followed by the kidney and liver. Compared with pre-implantation (day 0), there were no significant differences in most hematological indicators in Groups B and C (P > 0.05). Furthermore, histopathologic examination of the kidneys of dogs from Group C revealed no significant kidney damage. Unlike the intravenous CDDP group (Group A), no animals in the implantation groups showed any clinical signs of toxicity.

CONCLUSION

CDDP-NP implants can be used to achieve a smooth pharmacokinetic curve and higher drug concentration, as well as a longer mean residence time at the implantation site, with reduced side effects compared with intravenous CDDP.