A novel approach to study the pMDI plume using an infrared camera and to evaluate the aerodynamic properties after varying the time between actuations

Formulation, Device, and Clinical Factors Influencing the Targeted Delivery of COVID-19 Vaccines to the Lungs

The COVID-19 pandemic has proven to be an unprecedented health crisis in the human history with more than 5 million deaths worldwide caused to the SARS-CoV-2 and its variants ( https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 ). The currently authorized lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated mRNA vaccines have been shown to have more than 90% vaccine efficacy at preventing COVID-19 illness (Baden et al. New England J Med 384(5):403-416, 2021; Thomas et al., 2021). In addition to vaccines, other small molecules belonging to the class of anti-viral and anti-inflammatory compounds have also been prescribed to reduce the viral proliferation and the associated cytokine storm. These anti-viral and anti-inflammatory compounds have also been shown to be effective in reducing COVID-19 exacerbations especially in reducing the host inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2. However, all of the currently FDA-authorized vaccines for COVID-19 are meant for intramuscular injection directly into the systemic circulation. Also, most of the small molecules investigated for their anti-COVID-19 efficacy have also been explored using the intravenous route with a few of them explored for the inhalation route (Ramakrishnan et al. Lancet Respir Med 9:763-772, 2021; Horby et al. N Engl J Med 384(8):693-704, 2021). The fact that the SARS-CoV-2 enters the human body mainly via the nasal and airway route resulting in the lungs being the primary organs of infection as characterized by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-mediated cytokine storm in the alveolar region has made the inhalation route gain significant attention for the purposes of targeting both vaccines and small molecules to the lungs (Mitchell et al., J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 33(4):235-8, 2020). While there have been many studies reporting the safety and efficacy of targeting various therapeutics to the lungs to treat COVID-19, there is still a need to match the choice of inhalation formulation and the delivery device platform itself with the patient-related factors like breathing pattern and respiratory rate as seen in a clinical setting. In that perspective, this review aims to describe the various formulation and patient-related clinical factors that can play an important role in the judicious choice of the inhalation delivery platforms or devices for the development of inhaled COVID-19 vaccines.

The Effect of Adding a Training Device and Smartphone Application to Traditional Verbal Counseling in Asthmatic Children

INTRODUCTION

New training devices have been introduced to help in inhaler counseling by addressing the inspiratory flow through the metered-dose inhaler (MDI), which is the most important problem of the MDI inhalation technique. This study aims to compare the effects of MDI traditional verbal counseling and advanced counseling using training devices with a smartphone application in pediatric asthmatic patients.

METHODS

A total of 201 pediatric asthmatic subjects (8-18 years) were divided into two groups: a verbal counseling group, who received only MDI verbal counseling training (n = 101), and an advanced counseling group who received counseling using a training device (Flo-Tone with Trainhaler smartphone application) in addition to the traditional MDI verbal counseling (n = 100). Every patient in the two groups attended three counseling visits, 1 month apart. At each visit, pulmonary functions [peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) as % of predicted] were measured. Also, patients were asked to perform their normal inhalation technique using their MDI, and mistakes were detected and recorded by the investigator. Then, patients were trained on the correct steps of the MDI inhalation technique using either verbal counseling or advanced counseling depending on their study group. In the advanced group, the Flo-Tone was connected to the mouthpiece of the MDI to blow a whistle while the patient inhaled from the MDI. That whistle was detected by the Trainhaler smartphone application and the duration of inhalation determined by the application was recorded.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a gradual significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the total mean number of MDI inhalation technique mistakes from the second visit of counseling, and the improvement continued in the third visit, with a lower number of mistakes in the advanced group especially in inhaling at a slow rate until the lungs are a full step. Also, the advanced counseling group showed a gradual significant increase (p < 0.05) in lung function (PEF and FEV1% of predicted) from the second visit of counseling, particularly (FEV1% predicted) results which showed a greater and more rapid overall improvement in the advanced group compared to the limited overall improvements that occurred in the control group, while significant improvement (p < 0.05) of lung function was obtained at the third visit in the verbal counseling group. In the advanced group, the number of seconds measured by the smartphone application, which represents the duration of inhalation, increased significantly (p < 0.05) in the second and third visits.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of training devices and smartphone applications to traditional verbal counseling of MDI inhalation technique in asthmatic children resulted in significant improvements in lung function (especially in FEV1% of predicted results), and duration of inhalation, and progressive decreases in the average number of MDI inhalation techniques errors compared to the verbal counseling group.

Cascade Impactor Performance of Commercial pMDI Formulations Using Modified Induction Ports

The induction port (IP) for aerosol analysis with the Next Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor as monographed in the United States and European pharmacopoeia (USPIP) lacks physiological relevance, which, amongst other reasons, has been identified as critical for the predictability of in vitro aerosol data to lung deposition observed in vivo. In this publication, we report the impact of replacing the USPIP with two modified induction ports, which were designed based around geometries derived from a computer tomographic scan of a human trachea and the distal section of the USPIP. Test formulations were selected on the basis of availability of in vivo lung deposition data so that results obtained in vitro could be evaluated for their predictability. All formulations assessed showed increased deposition in the modified induction ports, and different mechanisms of particle deposition have been identified. In vitro predictions of the lung deposition were found to correlate well with the in vivo observations reported using the modified induction ports. Furthermore, the quality of the correlation was found superior to the one achieved with the USPIP with an average deviation of the predicted from observed values (n = 10) of 6 ± 4, 12 ± 6, and 16 ± 6% for the modified induction ports (mIP and mIPext) and the USPIP, respectively, when using a fine particle fraction (FPF) cutoff value of 5 μm. Using a FPF cutoff value of 3 μm yielded a more accurate in vitro-in vivo correlation with an average deviation of the predicted from observed values of 5 ± 4, 7 ± 5, and 8 ± 4% for the mIP, mIPext, and USPIP, respectively. For both FPF size cutoff values, the mIP yielded the most accurate in vitro-in vivo correlation.