Predicting the API partitioning between lipid-based drug delivery systems and water

Can Pure Predictions of Activity Coefficients from PC-SAFT Assist Drug-Polymer Compatibility Screening?

The bioavailability of poorly water-soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) can be improved via the formulation of an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD), where the API is incorporated into a suitable polymeric carrier. Optimal carriers that exhibit good compatibility (i.e., solubility and miscibility) with given APIs are typically identified through experimental means, which are routinely labor- and cost-inefficient. Therefore, the perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory (PC-SAFT) equation of state, a popular thermodynamic model in pharmaceutical applications, is examined in terms of its performance regarding the computational pure prediction of API-polymer compatibility based on activity coefficients (API fusion properties were taken from experiments) without any binary interaction parameters fitted to API-polymer experimental data (that is, kij = 0 in all cases). This kind of prediction does not need any experimental binary information and has been underreported in the literature so far, as the routine modeling strategy used in the majority of the existing PC-SAFT applications to ASDs comprised the use of nonzero kij values. The predictive performance of PC-SAFT was systematically and thoroughly evaluated against reliable experimental data for almost 40 API-polymer combinations. We also examined the effect of different sets of PC-SAFT parameters for APIs on compatibility predictions. Quantitatively, the total average error calculated over all systems was approximately 50% in the weight fraction solubility of APIs in polymers, regardless of the specific API parametrization. The magnitude of the error for individual systems was found to vary significantly from one system to another. Interestingly, the poorest results were obtained for systems with self-associating polymers such as poly(vinyl alcohol). Such polymers can form intramolecular hydrogen bonds, which are not accounted for in the PC-SAFT variant routinely applied to ASDs (i.e., that used in this work). However, the qualitative ranking of polymers with respect to their compatibility with a given API was reasonably predicted in many cases. It was also predicted correctly that some polymers always have better compatibility with the APIs than others. Finally, possible future routes to improve the cost-performance ratio of PC-SAFT in terms of parametrization are discussed.

Purely Predicting the Pharmaceutical Solubility: What to Expect from PC-SAFT and COSMO-RS?

A pair of popular thermodynamic models for pharmaceutical applications, namely, the perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory (PC-SAFT) equation of state and the conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) are thoroughly benchmarked for their performance in predicting the solubility of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in pure solvents. The ultimate goal is to provide an illustration of what to expect from these progressive frameworks when applied to the thermodynamic solubility of APIs based on activity coefficients in a purely predictive regime without specific experimental solubility data (the fusion properties of pure APIs were taken from experiments). While this kind of prediction represents the typical modus operandi of the first-principles-aided COSMO-RS, PC-SAFT is a relatively highly parametrized model that relies on experimental data, against which its pure-substance and binary interaction parameters (k_ij) are fitted. Therefore, to make this benchmark as fair as possible, we omitted any binary parameters of PC-SAFT (i.e., k_ij = 0 in all cases) and preferred pure-substance parameter sets for APIs not trained to experimental solubility data. This computational approach, together with a detailed assessment of the obtained solubility predictions against a large experimental data set, revealed that COSMO-RS convincingly outperformed PC-SAFT both qualitatively (i.e., COSMO-RS was better in solvent ranking) and quantitatively, even though the former is independent of both substance- and mixture-specific experimental data. Regarding quantitative comparison, COSMO-RS outperformed PC-SAFT for 9 of the 10 APIs and for 63% of the API-solvent systems, with root-mean-square deviations of the predicted data from the entire experimental data set being 0.82 and 1.44 log units, respectively. The results were further analyzed to expand the picture of the performance of both models with respect to the individual APIs and solvents. Interestingly, in many cases, both models were found to qualitatively incorrectly predict the direction of deviations from ideality. Furthermore, we examined how the solubility predictions from both models are sensitive to different API parametrizations.