Otolaryngologists may not be doing enough to diagnose pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis

Inflammatory Causes of Dysphagia in Children

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are the most common inflammatory causes of pediatric dysphagia, but several other less prevalent conditions should be considered. These conditions can affect one or several aspects of the swallowing process. In some inflammatory conditions dysphagia may be an early symptom. Esophagoscopy and instrumental swallow studies are often needed to determine the underlying diagnosis and best treatment plan. In some inflammatory conditions dysphagia can portend a worse outcome and need for more aggressive treatment of the underlying condition. Consultations with speech language pathology, gastroenterology, dietetics, allergy/immunology and/or rheumatology are often needed to optimize management.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis-A Primer for Otolaryngologists

Importance

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, inflammatory condition of the esophagus. Prevalence of EoE is on the rise and, owing to its associated extragastrointestinal manifestations and comorbidities, otolaryngologists are increasingly encountering this condition in their practice.

Observations

Symptoms of EoE are vague and vary greatly based on patient's age. The gastrointestinal symptoms include dysphagia, food impaction, feeding difficulties, symptoms mimicking gastroesophageal reflux, abdominal pain, vomiting, and failure to thrive. Several otolaryngologic symptoms are associated with EoE including rhinosinusitis, chronic cough, recurrent croup, hoarseness, and other aerodigestive symptoms refractory to gastroesophageal reflux therapy. Eosinophilic esophagitis is also frequently associated with other atopic conditions, such as asthma, eczema, and food allergies. The diagnosis is made on endoscopy with biopsies that reveal eosinophil-predominant esophageal inflammation. There are 3 major treatment approaches to EoE, commonly referred to as the 3 Ds: diet, drugs, and dilation. Untreated inflammation of esophagus from EoE can result in irreversible structural damage to the esophagus, leading to fibrosis, strictures, and impaired esophageal function.

Conclusions and Relevance

Eosinophilic esophagitis is now a fairly prevalent condition with considerable morbidity. Otolaryngologists should be familiar with the various clinical presentations of this condition in different age groups. Early diagnosis and treatment of this condition is a key for avoiding or postponing its complications.

Early Life Risk Factors in Pediatric EoE: Could We Prevent This Modern Disease?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic antigen-mediated inflammatory disease that affects the esophagus. In the last 20 years, a large number of epidemiological studies showed a significant increase in the incidence and prevalence of EoE, especially in developed countries. This phenomenon might correlate to the overall increase in pediatric allergic diseases or might be a result of improved medical awareness and knowledge through modern diagnostic instruments. Since 1993, when EoE was first recognized as a distinct clinical entity, several signs of progress in the pathophysiology of EoE were achieved. However, a few studies reported data on early risk factors for pediatric EoE and how these factors may interfere with genes. Currently, the most defined risk factors for EoE are male sex, Caucasian race, and atopic comorbidities. Other putative risk factors may include alterations in epithelial barrier function and fibrous remodeling, esophageal dysbiosis, variation in the nature and timing of oral antigen exposure, and early prescription of proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics. Notably, the timing and nature of food antigen exposure may be fundamental in inducing or reversing immune tolerance, but no studies are reported. This review summarized the current evidence on the risk factors that might contribute to the increasing development of EoE, focusing on the possible preventive role of early interventions.

Respiratory symptoms associated with eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an atopic condition diagnosed based on eosinophilic infiltration in the esophagus and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Typical clinical manifestations of EoE include feeding refusal, vomiting, and dysphagia however recent reports highlight an associations with extraesophageal symptoms. By definition the inflammatory response in EoE is restricted to the esophagus. However, accounts of symptoms such as chronic refractory cough, recurrent croup, hoarseness as well as subglottic stenosis, and an increase in otolaryngologic surgeries in patients with EoE raise the possibility of extraesophageal manifestations of the disease. These symptoms have been reported at times in the absence of typical gastrointestinal symptoms. While the condition is usually managed by gastroenterologist and/or allergist, the presence of extraesophageal symptoms and comorbid conditions may result in patients presenting initially to providers in other subspecialties such as pulmonology and otorhinolaryngology. The use of proton pump inhibitors and corticosteroids are part of the management of EoE. Awareness of the possibility of EoE before the empiric use of these therapies is important as there use can make identifying and diagnosing patients with EoE correctly challenging. We review the medical literature regarding extraesophageal manifestations of EoE and highlight the importance of awareness for subspecialist outside of gastroenterology and allergy for the condition.

Association between Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Esophageal Food Impaction in the Pediatric Population

Objectives (1) To describe the presentation, management, and outcomes associated with pediatric esophageal food impaction (EFI) at a single tertiary care institution. (2) To identify the key clinical features of pediatric EFI that are associated with a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary care children's hospital. Subjects and Methods Thirty-five children <18 years of age presenting with EFI between November 1, 2006, and October 31, 2013, were included. Presenting symptoms, medical history, biopsy results, endoscopic findings, and underlying etiology were examined. Fisher exact test, t tests, and logistic regression were used to compare between patients with and without EoE. Results Thirty-five patients had isolated EFI and were included in the study. EoE accounted for 74% (n = 26) of pediatric EFI, with the remaining cases being attributed to neurologic impairment (n = 5, 15%), prior surgeries (n = 1, 3%), reflux esophagitis (n = 1, 3%), or unknown etiologies (n = 2, 6%). EFI was the initial manifestation of EoE in 81% (n = 21) of patients. The most common presenting symptoms were dysphagia (n = 34), choking (n = 26), and vomiting (n = 23). Linear furrowing was the only endoscopic finding that was significantly associated with EoE ( P < .001). Conclusion Most esophageal food impactions in the pediatric population are associated with an underlying diagnosis of EoE and are often the initial manifestation of the disease. EoE must be considered in all pediatric patients with EFI; esophageal biopsies should be strongly considered in these patients at the time of endoscopic management of the EFI.

The role of the otolaryngologist in the evaluation and diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical presentation and role of the otolaryngologist in the evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) at a tertiary pediatric hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

Records from pediatric patients with a diagnosis of EoE from 2003 to 2015 were reviewed. Study variables were analyzed to compare patients presenting to different specialties.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one patients with EoE were evaluated. The median age at diagnosis was 9.0 years (range 0.8-19.0); 73% were male. Sixty-seven percent of patients initially presented to gastroenterology and 18% to otolaryngology. Time from initial presentation to diagnosis did not differ between the patients presenting to the two specialties (median 2.3 vs. 2.0 months, P = 0.510). Overall, 26% presented with airway symptoms (stridor, chronic cough, croup, or dysphonia). Patients diagnosed by the otolaryngology service were younger (3.4 vs. 10.4 years, P < 0.0001), had a higher incidence of airway symptoms (68% vs. 15%, P < 0.001), and demonstrated fewer gastrointestinal symptoms (86% vs. 100%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with EoE frequently present to otolaryngology undiagnosed in the first 5 years of life, making esophagoscopy with biopsy an important adjunct to airway endoscopy in children with refractory aerodigestive symptoms. Otolaryngologists are uniquely poised to facilitate early diagnosis and initiation of therapy for these children, potentially reducing long-term sequelae.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 127:1459-1464, 2017.

The utility of bronchoalveolar lavage findings in the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis in children

INTRODUCTION

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)-nucleated cell counts and the lipid-laden alveolar macrophage index (LLMI) have been investigated in predicting chronic aspiration as well as reflux esophagitis with variable results. To date, BAL neutrophil percentages and the LLMI have not been described in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate BAL neutrophil percentages and LLMI levels in patients with EoE and compare these levels in patients with aerodigestive concerns without biopsy-proven EoE.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients referred to an aerodigestive evaluation team for overlapping aerodigestive complaints (dysphagia, stridor, subglottic stenosis, feeding intolerance, and chronic aspiration). Patients underwent microlaryngoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy, and bronchoscopy and BAL were indicated by symptoms. BAL neutrophil percentages, LLMI levels, esophageal biopsy results, and esophageal dual-probe pH/impedance were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included in the study that underwent comprehensive workup for aerodigestive complaints. Patients were subdivided into two groups: (1) negative esophageal biopsy (for EoE) and (2) positive esophageal biopsy. There were no significant differences between the groups in percentage neutrophils (p=0.55, unpaired t-test) or LLMI levels (p=0.14, unpaired t-test).

DISCUSSION

BAL neutrophil percentages and the LLMI are unreliable in identifying patients with silent aspiration and gastroesophageal reflux. To date, there is no report of the utility of BAL neutrophil percentages and the LLMI in diagnosing patients with EoE. Our series indicates no correlation in neutrophil percentages or LLMI in patients with EoE versus patients without EoE that are referred to tertiary centers with aerodigestive concerns.

CONCLUSION

BAL neutrophil percentages and LLMI levels are not a reliable predictor of eosinophilic esophagitis in children with complex aerodigestive concerns. Esophageal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of EoE and the challenge remains to find other markers that raise suspicion for EoE for the non-gastroenterologist or that stage the extent of disease beyond the esophagus.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis: a systematic review for otolaryngologists

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a chronic, immune/antigen-mediated oesophageal disease, only recently, but increasingly, recognised in the world literature. It is diagnosed and managed primarily by medical gastroenterologists and allergy specialists, and is a distinct disease entity, affecting both children and adults. Few studies have been published in otolaryngology journals, although otolaryngologists will encounter patients with undiagnosed eosinophilic oesophagitis. Patients may present with dysphagia, bolus obstruction or with other ENT disorders, such as atopic rhinitis, reflecting the underlying systemic allergic disorder.

OBJECTIVE

This paper systematically reviews the evidence base published on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis, particularly as it relates to otolaryngology practice.

Pediatric patients with chronic cough and recurrent croup: the case for a multidisciplinary approach

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of our multidisciplinary approach to recurrent croup and chronic cough.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all patients with recurrent croup and chronic cough managed at a tertiary care children's hospital by our Comprehensive Airway, Respiratory, and Esophageal (CARE) Team. Charts were reviewed for all patients who carried a diagnosis of recurrent croup or chronic cough. Patients were excluded if they did not receive a full workup, including micro-direct laryngoscopy, flexible and/or rigid bronchoscopy, bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL), and upper endoscopy with biopsies. We reviewed the records for the presence of gastrointestinal complaints, abdominal pain and failure to thrive (FTT) and compared the children with documented esophagitis to the remaining children.

RESULTS

Forty patients met inclusion criteria. 53% had airway abnormalities; the most common was tracheomalacia, followed by enlarged adenoids. 38% had esophagitis (group 1) while 62% had normal esophageal biopsies (group 2). Among the children in group 1, 27% met criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis (>15 eosinophils per high powered field). There was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2 based on the presence of gastrointestinal complaints, abdominal pain and/or FTT (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups based on the location or presence of an airway abnormality (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with recurrent croup and chronic cough may benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to management. Our CARE Team approach led to a specific diagnosis in almost 95% of patients.

Eosinophilic Laryngitis in Children with Aerodigestive Dysfunction

Objective

To describe the presence of laryngeal eosinophils and associated symptomatology in patients with aerodigestive dysfunction.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Single tertiary pediatric referral center.

Subjects

Eighty-one consecutive pediatric patients referred to a multidisciplinary aerodigestive clinic with upper airway concerns.

Methods

Microlaryngoscopy and posterior arytenoid biopsy, flexible bronchoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and esophageal biopsy, and impedance probe testing were performed as indicated by clinical symptoms. Positive versus negative posterior arytenoid biopsy for eosinophils and the presence or absence of concomitant histopathological laryngitis and/or esophagitis were measured.

Results

Nine of 81 (11%) patients had positive laryngeal biopsy for eosinophils (range, 1-29 eosinophils/high-powered field [HPF]). Three of these 9 patients also had concurrent biopsy-proven eosinophilic esophagitis, while 8 of 81 total patients had biopsy-proven eosinophilic esophagitis. The frequency of biopsy-proven eosinophilic esophagitis was higher in patients with posterior arytenoid eosinophils versus patients without laryngeal eosinophils (33% versus 6.9%, P = .0408).

Conclusions

Eosinophilic inflammation in the larynx has not been described in children with complex aerodigestive complaints. Posterior arytenoid eosinophils may serve as a marker of chronic laryngeal inflammation in children with aerodigestive dysfunction, although their exact role in this inflammation remains unclear. In our population, >15 eosinophils/HPF within posterior arytenoid biopsies was associated with concomitant eosinophilic esophagitis.

Otolaryngologic surgeries are frequent in children with eosinophilic esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to study the prevalence of otolaryngologic surgeries in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center. The type of otolaryngologic surgeries performed in patients with diagnosis of EoE was recorded during a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent of patients were male, with average age of EoE diagnosis at 7.5 years with an 83% incidence of atopy. Cohort analysis revealed that 33% (119/362) had a total of 275 otolaryngologic surgeries. Surgeries performed on 119 patients are as follows: 20% bilateral myringotomy with tubes, 14% tonsillectomy, 18.5% adenoidectomy, 1.4% sinus irrigation, 3.3% bronchoscopy, and 1.4% laryngotracheoplasty (LTP); 63% of patients underwent multiple procedures. Thirty percent of patients undergoing bilateral myringotomy with tube placement (BMT) needed additional tubes. Four of 5 LTP patients had successful operations. Twelve percent of patients had EoE diagnosis prior to an otolaryngologic surgery.

CONCLUSION

Thirty-three percent of children with EoE required otolaryngologic surgical intervention and nearly one-third who underwent BMT required additional ear tubes. A large fraction of children with EoE will undergo an otolaryngologic surgery, only a minority with a preoperative EoE diagnosis. Until the nature of this relationship is clarified, the high coincidence with otolaryngologic surgeries dictates that otolaryngologists should be familiar with diagnosis of EoE in patients.

Atypical croup: association with airway lesions, atopy, and esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

To report on airway endoscopic findings and gastrointestinal and atopic conditions in a large consecutive series of atypical croup.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary pediatric referral center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A surgical database was searched for all children who underwent full airway endoscopy to investigate atypical croup. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of large airway lesions in patients with atypical croup undergoing endoscopy. Demographics, secondary diagnoses, and rate of positive findings were documented. Age and atopy were correlated using Spearman's correlation coefficient, and multivariate analysis identified predictors of large airway lesions.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were identified over a period of 8 years (58 boys; mean [SD] age 4.8 [3.8] years; range, 46 days to 13.7 years). Of the 80 children, 31 had positive airway findings, with 33 large airway lesions demonstrated, including 10 subglottic stenosis, 7 laryngeal clefts, 6 subglottic hemangiomas, 4 tracheomalacia, and 3 laryngomalacia. Esophagitis was diagnosed in 36 children, 5 of whom had eosinophilic esophagitis. Thirty-five children had an atopic condition including asthma, allergic rhinitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and food allergies. Age correlated with associated atopy (coefficient 0.4, P < .0001) and predicted the presence of any airway lesion (coefficient -0.0625, P < .001) and subglottic stenosis in particular (coefficient -0.0362, P = .001). Prior intubation predicted subglottic stenosis (coefficient 0.267, P = .011).

CONCLUSION

Thirty-nine percent of airway endoscopies demonstrated large airway lesions. When eosinophilic esophagitis was sought, it was confirmed in over 1:10 patients. The findings bolster the case for airway endoscopy coupled with allergy and gastrointestinal investigations.

The otolaryngologic manifestations in children with eosinophilic esophagitis

OBJECTIVES

(1) To describe the incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in the population of patients undergoing esophagoscopy with biopsy by a pediatric otolaryngology service. (2) To elucidate the demographics, presenting symptoms, and endoscopic findings in children with EoE.

DESIGN

Case series.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The reports of esophageal biopsy specimens taken over 5 years in 2429 patients were reviewed. Ninety-two patients who received their initial diagnosis of EoE by the pediatric otolaryngology service with specimens showing 15 or greater eosinophils per high power field (HPF) were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The demographic data, history, presenting symptoms, and endoscopic findings were reviewed retrospectively for the patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The percentage of children diagnosed with EoE of all children undergoing esophageal biopsy.

RESULTS

A total of 92 children were diagnosed with EoE (3.8% of total children biopsied). The mean age at biopsy was 4.4 years, much lower than previously reported in the literature (approximately 8 years); 73% were boys and 27% girls. The main presenting symptom was cough (46%) followed by hoarseness, throat clearing, burping/vomiting, and abdominal pain. Forty three percent had a history of asthma and 17% a history of GERD. Half of patients had esophageal edema, a third were normal, and only a quarter had mucosal furrowing on endoscopic examination.

CONCLUSIONS

EoE is increasingly diagnosed as a clinical entity with a distinct symptom profile and etiology. Increased understanding of EoE and its predisposing factors requires a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management involving the pediatric otolaryngologist.

Toward uniformity in the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE): the effect of guidelines on variability of diagnostic criteria for EoE

OBJECTIVES

Recent consensus guidelines for diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have been published. Whether these guidelines have standardized diagnostic criteria for EoE is unknown. We aimed to determine if the EoE guidelines had an impact on the diagnostic criteria reported in the EoE literature, and whether the previously observed variability in diagnostic criteria has become more uniform.

METHODS

Two investigators independently conducted a MEDLINE search from 1 January 2007 through 30 June 2010 for all publications reporting EoE in human subjects, and also searched the proceedings of the 2007-2010 American College of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterological Association meetings, using a predefined search strategy. Data were extracted from all relevant publications.

RESULTS

Of the 799 publications identified, 149 original reports, 99 reviews, and 165 abstracts were included. In all, 32 original reports (21%) used diagnostic criteria consistent with each of the three components of the consensus guidelines. There was a significant increase when comparing original articles published after the release of the guidelines with those published earlier (31 vs. 6%, P<0.001). The proportion of original articles using 15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf) as a histological cut-point increased significantly (P=0.001). There was still substantial variability in biopsy protocols and eosinophil count methodology. The majority of original articles did not report microscope high-power field (HPF) area.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of original reports with diagnostic criteria consistent with the consensus guidelines has increased significantly. However, the majority of articles still did not conform to all three of the criteria in the guidelines, and biopsy and eosinophil count protocols continue to demonstrate significant variability. Standardization of biopsy and eosinophil count protocols is needed.