Light microscopic histopathology of adenoid tissue in otitis media with effusion: is there any relation?

Otitis media with effusion in preschool children with adenoid hypertrophy: Risk factors and nursing care

AIM

To evaluate the influencing factors of otitis media with effusion (OME) in children with adenoid hypertrophy and to provide evidence for clinical treatment and care of children with adenoid hypertrophy.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

METHODS

Preschool children with adenoid hypertrophy treated in our hospital from 1 January 2021 to 30 July 2022 were included. We analysed the characteristics of OME and non-OME children with adenoid hypertrophy. Pearson correlation analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the risk factors for OME in children with adenoid hypertrophy.

CONCLUSION

A total of 166 children with adenoid hypertrophy were included; the incidence of OME in children with adenoid hypertrophy was 34.94%. The incidence of OME decreased significantly with the increase in age (p = 0.014). Logistic regression analysis showed that age < 3 years (OR = 3.149, 95%CI: 2.812-3.807) and duration of adenoid hypertrophy ≥12 months (OR = 2.326, 95%CI: 2.066-2.612) were the risk factors of OME in children with adenoid hypertrophy (all p < 0.05).

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

The incidence of adenoid hypertrophy with OME is high in preschool children, and it is related to the age and duration of adenoid hypertrophy.

Pepsin deteriorates prognosis of children with otitis media with effusion who undergo myringotomy or tympanostomy tube insertion

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the concentrations of pepsin and pepsinogen within the middle ear cavity and determine whether pepsin and pepsinogen affect the prognosis of children with otitis media with effusion (OME).

METHODS

All middle-ear lavage fluid from patients with OME undergoing myringotomy (M subgroup) or tympanostomy tube insertion (T subgroup) was collected and pepsin and pepsinogen were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. After close follow-up over 2 years, the effects of pepsin and pepsinogen on the prognosis of the patients with OME in the M and T subgroups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average pepsin and pepsinogen concentrations were significantly lower in the M subgroup (n=54; 24.38±16.10mg/mL and 286.49±91.95mg/mL, respectively) than in the T subgroup (n=55; 45.56±16.60mg/mL and 664.92±107.06mg/mL; t=2.484, P=0.018 and t=2.670, P=0.011, respectively). In the M subgroup, the average time to tympanic membrane healing and tympanic pressure restoration to normal was much longer in pepsin(+) patients (17.0±2.0 days and 26.0±2.5 days, respectively) than in pepsin(-) patients (14.0±1.1 days and 22.0±1.0 days; t=3.871, P=0.001 and t=5.734, P=0.000, respectively), and the hearing level of pepsin(+) patients with OME ascended to 13.08±1.19dB, which was much lower than that of pepsin(-) patients (18.29±1.27dB; t=11.001, P=0.000). In the T subgroup, the complication rate including otorrhea and myringosclerosis was much higher in patients with high pepsin concentrations than in those with low pepsin concentrations (P<0.05). Finally, in both subgroups, the recurrence rates of OME in pepsin(+) or patients with high pepsin concentrations (34.6% [9/26] and 28.6% [10/35]) were significantly higher than those in pepsin(-) or low pepsin concentrations (10.7% [3/28] and 5.0% [1/20]; χ(2)=4.456, P=0.035 and χ(2)=4.420, P=0.036). However, pepsinogen had no significant effect on OME prognosis or recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Pepsin but not pepsinogen could postpone tympanic membrane healing and pressure restoration in children with OME undergoing myringotomy and increase the incidence of recurrence and complications including otorrhea and myringosclerosis for those undergoing tympanostomy tube insertion. Therefore, pepsin could be considered a poor prognostic factor for OME, further emphasizing the important role of pepsin in OME pathogenesis.