A new device for treatment of persistent otitis media with effusion

Resolution of Otitis Media with Effusion in Adults after a Three-Day Course of Treatment with a Manosonic Nebulizer-A Pilot Study

Background and Objectives: Aerosol drug administration is the primary treatment modality of otitis media with effusion (OME). An automatic manosonic aerosol generator (AMSA) delivers, with an acoustic overpressure, a therapeutic dosage of a drug by inhalation of the aerosol. However, available studies confirming their efficacy, especially in adults, are limited. Therefore, this pilot single-arm trial aimed to analyze changes in adults with OME following AMSA treatment. Materials and Methods: A group of 36 patients (mean age 51.4 years) with OME underwent a three-day treatment with inhaled mucolytic and steroids administered by AMSA. Tympanometry (tympanogram type, volume, compliance, pressure, and gradient) was performed to measure middle ear effusion before and after the intervention. Results: Following the intervention, partial and complete OME remission was observed in, respectively, 29 (81%) and 14 (39%) patients. The tympanogram type of the affected ears differed between baseline and after intervention measurements (p < 0.001). Tympanometry-based normalization, improvement deterioration and no change were observed in, respectively, 34 (68%), 1 (2%) 2 (4%), and 13 (26%) affected ears. Following the intervention, we observed an increase in continuously assessed middle ear volume (∆_median 0.19 mL, p = 0.002) and pressure (∆_median 142 daPa, p < 0.001), as well as a higher proportion of patients achieving categorical normalization of compliance (16% vs. 54%, p < 0.001) and pressure (28 vs. 64%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Treatment efficacy was not affected by age, sex, or season of recruitment (all p > 0.05). The results of this pilot study are encouraging, however, the use of AMSA management of OME in adults needs to be verified in future studies.

Autoinflation compared to ventilation tubes for treating chronic otitis media with effusion

BACKGROUND

Otitis media with effusion (OME) is the most common cause of acquired hearing loss and surgery in children. Autoinflation has been suggested as an alternative treatment for OME.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare treatment outcome with a new autoinflation device versus ventilation tube (VT) surgery or watchful waiting in children with chronic bilateral OME from the waiting list for surgery.

METHODS

Forty-five children performed autoinflation during four weeks, forty-five were submitted to VT surgery, and twenty-three were enrolled as control group. Tympanometry was performed in the autoinflation and the control groups and audiometry in all groups.

RESULTS

An equivalent hearing improvement was achieved in the autoinflation and the VT group at one (p=.19), six (p=.23) and twelve (p=.31) months with no significant alteration in the control group. In the autoinflation group 80% of the children avoided surgery and no complications were reported compared to 34% complication rate in the VT group.

CONCLUSION

Autoinflation achieved an equivalent improvement in hearing thresholds compared to VT surgery for treating OME.

SIGNIFICANCE

Autoinflation may be a reasonable first-line treatment for children with OME to potentially avoid surgery.Article Summary: The Moniri autoinflation device is well tolerated and an effective alternative to ventilation tubes for treatment of chronic otitis media with effusion in young children.What's known on this subject: Previous studies have shown that autoinflation may reduce effusion in children with otitis media with effusion; however limited compliance to treatment, lack of adequate hearing evaluation, short follow-up time and also lack of comparative data to ventilation tube surgery have been reported.What this study adds: A new device was developed to allow for the performance of autoinflation in young children. The effect is compared to ventilation tube surgery and equivalent improvement in hearing is achieved in the short and the long-term follow-up.

Nasal balloon autoinflation for glue ear in primary care: a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

Nasal balloon autoinflation is an effective, non-surgical treatment for symptomatic children with glue ear, although uptake is variable and evidence about acceptability and feasibility is limited.

AIM

To explore parent and healthcare professional views and experiences of nasal balloon autoinflation for children with glue ear in primary care.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a maximum-variety sample of parents, GPs, and practice nurses. The study took place between February 2013 and September 2014.

METHOD

Semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 14 parents, 31 GPs, and 19 nurses were included in the study. Parents described the nasal balloon as a natural, holistic treatment that was both acceptable and appealing to children. GPs and nurses perceived the method to be a low-cost, low-risk strategy, applicable to the primary care setting. Good instruction and demonstration ensured children mastered the technique and engaged with the treatment, but uncertainties were raised about training provision and potential impact on the GP consultation. Making nasal balloon autoinflation part of a child's daily routine enhances compliance, but difficulties can arise if children are unwell or refuse to cooperate.

CONCLUSION

Nasal balloon autoinflation is an acceptable, low-cost treatment option for children with glue ear in primary care. Provision of educational materials and demonstration of the method are likely to promote uptake and compliance. Wider use of the nasal balloon has the potential to enhance early management, and may help to fill the management gap arising from forthcoming changes to care pathways.

International consensus (ICON) on management of otitis media with effusion in children

Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a common childhood disease defined as the presence of liquid in the middle ear without signs or symptoms of acute ear infection. Children can be impacted mainly with hearing impairment and/or co-occurring recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) thus requiring treatment. Although many meta-analyses and national guidelines have been issued, management remains difficult to standardize, and use of surgical and medical treatments continue to vary. We convened an international consensus conference as part of the 2017 International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies Congress, to identify best practices in OME management. Overall, regional differences were minor and consensual management was obtained on several important issues. At initial assessment, although a thorough medical examination is necessary to seek reflux, allergy or nasal obstruction symptoms; an age-appropriate auditory test is the only assessment required in children without abnormal history. Non-surgical treatments poorly address the underlying problem of an age-dependent dysfunctional Eustachian tube; auto-inflation seems to be the only beneficial, low-risk and low-cost non-surgical therapy. There was a clear international recommendation against using steroids, antibiotics, decongestants or antihistamines to treat OME, because of side-effects, cost issues and no convincing evidence of long-term effectiveness. Decisions to insert tympanostomy ventilation tubes should be based on an auditory test but also take into account the child's context and overall hearing difficulties. Tubes significantly improve hearing and reduce the number of recurrent AOM with effusion while in place. Adjuvant adenoidectomy should be considered in children over four years of age, and in those with significant nasal obstruction or infection.

Otitis media with effusion: benefits and harms of strategies in use for treatment and prevention

Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a common clinical condition that is associated with hearing loss. It can be diagnosed at least once in approximately 80% of preschool children: 30-40% of them have recurrent episodes, and 5-10% have chronic disease. OME, in recurrent and persistent cases, might significantly delay or impair communication skills, resulting in behavioral and educational difficulties. Several therapeutic approaches have been used to avoid these problems. Most, however, have not been adequately studied, and no definitive conclusions can be drawn. Official guidelines do not recommend the use of decongestants, antihistamines, steroids, or antibiotics. The data are too scanty to assess other interventions, although autoinflation, because it incurs neither cost nor adverse events, deserves attention. Surgical procedures (i.e., tympanostomy tube insertion and adenoidectomy as an adjuvant) can be useful in some cases. This review evaluates all the current OME treatments and preventive measures, including their possible adverse events.

Autoinflation for treatment of persistent otitis media with effusion in children: a cross-over study with a 12-month follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the present study were to evaluate the efficacy of and compliance with a new device for autoinflation in the treatment of persistent otitis media with effusion (OME) in young children.

METHODS

Forty-five children with persistent OME with a bilateral type B or C2 tympanogram for at least three months and history of subjective hearing loss, waiting for grommet surgery, were randomised to a treatment and a control group. Twenty-three children aged between three and eight years started as the treatment group with the new device for autoinflation. Another 22 children, aged between two and eight years were included as controls. After a period of four weeks, a cross-over was performed. Both groups underwent otomicroscopy, tympanometry and audiometry at inclusion and after one and two months for the evaluation of treatment efficiency. The primary outcome measurements were improvement in middle-ear pressure and hearing thresholds at eight weeks. Both groups were then followed up for another 10 months.

RESULTS

In the treatment group, the mean middle-ear pressure for both ears and the mean hearing thresholds for the best ear improved by 166 daPa (p<0.0001) and 6 dB (p<0.0001), respectively after four weeks, while in the control group, non-significant alterations were observed. After the cross-over of the control group to treatment, equivalent improvements in the mean middle-ear pressure and the mean hearing thresholds of 187 daPa (p<0.0001) and 7 dB (p<0.01), respectively were achieved also in this group. After treatment in both groups at eight weeks, four of 45 children were submitted to grommet surgery. During the long-term follow-up another five children were submitted to surgery due to recurrence of disease. All the children managed to perform the manoeuvre and no side-effects were detected.

CONCLUSION

The device demonstrated efficiency in improving both middle-ear pressure and hearing thresholds in most children after four weeks of treatment. It might therefore be possible to consider this method of autoinflation in children with persistent OME during the watchful waiting period.