Acquired middle ear cholesteatoma in children with cleft palate: experience from 18 surgical cases

Outcomes of Tympanoplasty After Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze graft success rates and hearing outcomes in patients with a history of cleft palate (CP) repair undergoing tympanoplasty.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Per PRISMA guidelines, the databases were searched from date of inception through December 14, 2021. Studies of patients with previous CP repair who underwent tympanoplasty were included. Meta-analysis of proportions, continuous measures, odds ratios (ORs), and meta-regression were used to analyze graft success and hearing outcomes after tympanoplasty.

RESULTS

A total of 323 patients with CP repair and 1169 controls were included. The proportion of graft success was 86.7% (95% CI, 76.1%-94.5%) in patients with CP repair and 88.8% (95% CI, 76.9-96.8) in controls. There was no difference in odds of graft success between patients with CP repair and controls (OR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.5-1.8]; P = .870). Age was not a significant moderator of graft success in patients with CP repair (r = 0.1 [95% CI, -0.2 to 0.3]; P = .689) or controls (r = -0.0 [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.1]; P = .952). Comparing mean differences between pre- and postoperative air-bone gap was not statistically significant in patients with CP repair and controls (0.2 dB [95% CI, -3.1 to 3.4]; P = .930). Odds of functional success (postoperative air-bone gap <20 dB) were not different between the groups (OR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.5-1.4]; P = .450).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis does not endorse anatomic or functional differences between patients with CP repair and controls after tympanoplasty. However, there is a paucity of evidence for younger children. Further studies are warranted to elucidate specific risk factors for tympanoplasty outcomes in young patients with previous CP repair.

Management of acquired cholesteatoma in patients with craniofacial anomalies: An institutional experience

PURPOSE

To analyze the surgical management of cholesteatoma in patients with craniofacial abnormalities, cleft lip/palate by reviewing the institutional experience. The secondary aim was to identify and describe the epidemiological profile of the collected data, and to relate the cleft palate and cholesteatoma.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective chart review includes 97 patients with craniofacial abnormalities and acquired cholesteatoma with anatomopathological proven in 118 ears. The following data were collected from the medical records between 1994 and 2018.

RESULTS

The first surgery performed on 76 of the 118 ears (64.4%) was the wall up mastoidectomy, while 42 of the 118 ears (35.5%) received the wall down technique. During the follow-up period of these patients, which ranged from 2 to 29 years, with an average of 13.4 years (±5.88), 77 wall up (40.3%) and 114 wall down (59.6%) mastoidectomies were performed. This brought the total to 191 mastoidectomy surgeries in 118 ears of 97 patients. Of the wall up mastoidectomies, 65 of the 77 (84.4%) presented with cholesteatoma recurrence. In the wall down mastoidectomies follow up, there were new surgical approaches in 15 of the 114 procedures (13.1%), with 6 patients (5.2%) having anatomopathologically proven cholesteatoma recurrences and 9 (7.8%) having clinical instability for cavity cleaning without identification of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Early approach with wall down/modified techniques guided by specific indication criteria may be more resolute, prevent multiple procedures, and preserve the bone pathway to facilitate possible future hearing rehabilitation in these patients.

Surgical management of middle ear cholesteatoma in children with Turner syndrome: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

As in other syndromes characterized by craniofacial anomalies, middle ear cholesteatoma is known to have a high prevalence in Turner syndrome. The aim of this study was to review a multicenter experience with the surgical management of middle ear cholesteatoma in children with Turner syndrome.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed sixteen girls with Turner syndrome who underwent otologic surgery for middle ear cholesteatoma between January 2000 and December 2012. Surgery was performed in 3 tertiary care otologic centers. Four patients had bilateral disease, resulting in a total of 20 ears treated. The following data were recorded: age, history of ventilation tube insertion, status of the controlateral ear, cholesteatoma location and extension, and surgical technique involved. Cholesteatoma recidivism, stable mastoid cavity and hearing levels were the main outcomes measured.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 3 to 15 years (mean 7 years). Fourteen ears underwent canal wall down mastoidectomy: no cases of recurrent cholesteatoma were observed in these cases; revision mastoidectomy with cavity obliteration was needed in 2 ears (14.3%) for recurrent otorrhea. In the remaining 6 ears a staged canal wall up mastoidectomy was performed: 1 child showed a recurrent cholesteatoma and required conversion to canal wall down mastoidectomy. A postoperative air-bone gap result of 0 to 20 dB was achieved in 6 ears (30%); in 9 ears (45%) postoperative air-bone gap was between 21 and 30 dB, while in 5 (25%) was >30 dB. Bone conduction thresholds remained unaffected in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Cholesteatoma in children with Turner syndrome is a challenging entity for the otologic surgeon. Although not mandatory, canal wall down mastoidectomy should be regarded as the technique of choice to achieve a safe and dry ear in TS children with middle ear cholesteatoma. Intact canal wall mastoidectomy should be adopted only in appropriately selected patients such as those with limited attic cholesteatoma that can be regularly followed-up.

Evolution of Acquired Middle Ear Cholesteatoma in Patients With Ectrodactyly, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Cleft Lip/Palate (EEC) Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To review an institutional experience with the surgical and clinical management of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma in patients with ectrodactyly, ectodermal dysplasia, cleft lip/palate (EEC) syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Eight patients with medical history significant for EEC syndrome who underwent surgery for acquired middle ear cholesteatoma between 1996 and 2016.

INTERVENTION(S)

Appropriate surgical interventions at the time of admission.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

History of ventilation tube insertion, status of the contralateral ear, surgical technique, cholesteatoma recidivism, presence of postoperative external auditory canal stenosis, pre and postoperative audiograms.

RESULTS

Cholesteatoma was diagnosed in all patients, 3 (37.5%) unilateral and 5 (62.5%) bilateral, totalizing 13 ears. Six ears (46.2%) underwent a canal wall up mastoidectomy but required conversion to a canal wall down technique in a second procedure due to recurrent cholesteatoma. In the remaining seven ears (53.8%) a canal wall down mastoidectomy was performed. Of all meatoplasty performed, seven (53.8%) evolved with stenosis of the external auditory canal.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that most patients with EEC syndrome and middle ear cholesteatoma should be considered for a canal wall down mastoidectomy due to extensive disease and a high rate of recidivism. In addition, a high percentage of postoperative stenosis of the external auditory canal was found in this group.

Impact of pharyngofixation in cleft palate repair surgery on the development of chronic adhesive otitis media

BACKGROUND

A significant percentage of children with cleft palate suffer from otitis media with effusion and its consequences, such as deafness, chronic adhesive otitis and cholesteatoma. This study aimed to determine whether these effects can be minimised by selecting pharyngofixation as the surgical technique for cleft palate correction.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of 155 patients (308 ears) who underwent surgery from age 5 months to 8 years and were followed up for 36-84 months.

RESULTS

In all, 125 ears (41 per cent) had epitympanic retraction, 45 ears (14 per cent) had sinus tympani retraction and 5 patients (3 per cent) had cholesteatoma. Use of the pharyngofixation technique did not significantly correlate with (1) the severity of otological findings or (2) the incidence of retraction pockets in the epitympanum and sinus tympani (p = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

Pharyngofixation did not significantly alter the severity of long-term otological findings.

Retrospective analysis of tympanoplasty in children with cleft palate: a 24-year experience. II. Cholesteatomatous cases

BACKGROUND

Contradictory experience has been published on the outcomes of ear surgery in patients with cleft palate.

OBJECTIVES

The authors of this study investigated whether there were differences in the short- and long-term outcomes of tympanoplasty performed due to cholesteatoma in children with or without cleft palate.

SETTING

Tertiary care medical centre.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the first author's 24-year experience of paediatric tympanoplasty using the software programme developed by the fourth author. The outcomes of 268 tympanoplasties on 172 ears with cholesteatoma in 151 'NoCleft' patients were compared to the outcomes of 35 tympanoplasties on 20 ears of 19 'Cleft' patients. The average age of the patients was 10.7±3.6 years and 9.5±2.7 years respectively. The average follow-up time was 4 and 4.1 years.

RESULTS

Preoperative PTA-ABGs (31.22/34.88 dB; p=0.058), best postoperative PTA-ABGs (17.04/16.4 dB; p=0.499), last postoperative PTA-ABGs (19.93/20.98 dB; p=0.298), the final hearing improvement (11.29/13.9 dB; p=0.193) and postoperative PTA-ABG deterioration with time (2.89/4.58 dB; p=0.117) were statistically compared between the 'NoCleft' and 'Cleft' groups. The same parameters were analyzed separately in the case of tympanoplasty performed with intact ossicular chain and the different type of columella ossiculoplasty. No significant differences were found between the two groups in any of these parameters. However, significant difference was found in the necessity for grommet insertion (8-fold difference, p≈0), and conversion to open techniques (p≈0).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that the achievable audiological outcomes of tympanoplasty in children with cleft palate and cholesteatoma do not differ significantly from those of the general child population. However, this more frequently requires ventilation tube insertion and more frequent follow-up visits. The latter is ensured by patient care within the frameworks of the 'Cleft Palate Team'. We have to accept that in some cases Eustachian tube dysfunction caused by the underlying disease (cleft palate) 'takes over' and we have to resort to open techniques.

Open vs closed type congenital cholesteatoma of the middle ear: two distinct entities or two aspects of the same phenomenon?

OBJECTIVE

The clinical features and surgical results of "closed type" versus "open type" congenital cholesteatoma were compared in order to analyse the differences between the two forms; whether the morphology of the disease may have a role in the staging systems has been also evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively 95 patients (96 ears) who underwent surgery for congenital cholesteatoma over a 15-year period focusing on the clinical differences between open and closed type congenital cholesteatoma.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (74%) had a closed-type and 25 (26%) an open type congenital cholesteatoma. Our study confirmed the higher prevalence of the closed type, as well as, a younger age at initial diagnosis compared with the open type congenital cholesteatoma. Other differences between the two forms were: modality of diagnosis (pathognomonic otoscopy in 100% of the closed type and in 40% of the open type), positive history for otitis media with effusion (51.4% in closed type vs 20% in open type), involvement of the tympanic membrane quadrants (anterior quadrants were more frequently involved in the closed forms, whereas posterior quadrants were more frequently involved in the open forms), disease extension and aggressiveness. A residual cholesteatoma was found in 6 out of the 71 patients (8.4%) with a closed type congenital cholesteatoma and in 10 out of the 25 patients (40%) with an open type congenital cholesteatoma. After adjusting for potential confounders, open-type congenital cholesteatoma was significantly associated with residual cholesteatoma compared to the closed-type (odds ratio [OR] 7.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-49.77, p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that the open congenital cholesteatoma has global clinical features that are uniquely different from the classical closed form. These differences could reflect a distinct pathogenesis, but there is no proof of this to date. The classification of the congenital cholesteatoma could be further refined by adding the morphologic type of the disease.