Delayed prelingual cochlear implantation in childhood and puberty

Cochlear implants: the effects of age on outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Cochlear implants (CIs) provide access to sound for children and adults who do not receive adequate benefit from hearing aids. Age at implantation is known to affect outcomes across the lifespan.

AREAS COVERED

The effects of age on CI outcomes are examined for infants, children, adolescents, and older adults. A variety of outcome measures are considered, including speech perception, language, cognition, and quality of life measures.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

For those meeting candidacy criteria, CIs are beneficial at any age. In general, younger age is related to greater benefit when considering pre-lingual deafness. Other factors such as additional disabilities, may mitigate this effect. Post-lingually deafened adults demonstrate similar benefit regardless of age, though the oldest individuals (80+) may see smaller degrees of improvement from preoperative scores. Benefit can be measured in many ways, and the areas of greatest benefit may vary based on age: young children appear to see the greatest effects of age at implantation on language measures, whereas scores on cognitive measures appear to be most impacted for the oldest population. Future research should consider implantation at extreme ages (5-9 months or > 90 years), unconventional measures of CI benefit including qualitative assessments, and longitudinal designs.

The use of the MUSS and the SIR scale in late-implanted prelingually deafened adolescents and adults as a subjective evaluation

Background: The SIR scale has been widely used to measure speech improvement in late-implanted prelingually deafened adolescents and adults. However the ceiling effect of the SIR scale may lead to the loss of some information.Aim/objectives: To evaluate the oral ability of late-implanted prelingually deafened adolescents and adults using the MUSS and SIR scale and to analyse the relationship between the SIR score and the MUSS score.Material and methods: Ninety-four prelingually deafened adolescents and adults who had received cochlear implants were investigated. The MUSS and SIR scale were used to evaluate oral ability.Results: The relationship between the duration of implant use and the MUSS score was significantly different. No significant differences were found among the groups for age at implantation, gender and side of cochlear implantation. The total score on the MUSS was positively correlated with the SIR score.Conclusions and significance: The MUSS and the SIR scale could be used to evaluate the oral ability of late implanted patients. The SIR scale could be used to perform a rapid assessment and the MUSS could help provide more information. The combination of the two scales could be used to evaluate vocal ability more accurately and effectively.