1
|
Ibraheem OA, Abdelghani M, Hassan EM, El-Nebtity N, Gad NH. Multidisciplinary Cognitive Function Assessment of Good versus Poor Performance in Children with Cochlear Implants: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 27:e445-e454. [PMID: 37564474 PMCID: PMC10411165 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Despite the developing technology of cochlear implants (CIs), implanted prelingual hearing-impaired children exhibit variable speech processing outcomes. When these children match in personal and implant-related criteria, the CI outcome variability could be related to higher-order cognitive impairment. Objectives To evaluate different domains of cognitive function in good versus poor CI performers using a multidisciplinary approach and to find the relationship between these functions and different levels of speech processing. Methods This observational, cross-sectional study used the word recognition score (WRS) test to categorize 40 children with CIs into 20 good (WRS/65%) and 20 poor performers (WRS < 65%). All participants were examined for speech processing at different levels (auditory processing and spoken language) and cognitive functioning using (1) verbal tests (verbal component of Stanford-Binet intelligence [SBIS], auditory memory, auditory vigilance, and P300); and (2) performance tasks (performance components of SBIS, and trail making test). Results The outcomes of speech processing at different functional levels and both domains of cognitive function were analyzed and correlated. Speech processing was impaired significantly in poor CI performers. This group also showed a significant cognitive function deficit, in which the verbal abilities were more affected (in 93.5%) than in the good performers (in 69.5%). Moreover, cognitive function revealed a significant correlation and predictive effect on the CI speech outcomes. Conclusion Cognitive function impairment represented an important factor that underlies the variable speech proficiency in cochlear-implanted children. A multidisciplinary evaluation of cognitive function would provide a comprehensive overview to improve training strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola A Ibraheem
- Audio-Vestibular Medicine Unit, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdelghani
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
| | - Elham M Hassan
- Phoniatrics Unit, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
| | - Nadia El-Nebtity
- Audio-Vestibular Medicine Unit, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
| | - Nahlah H Gad
- Audio-Vestibular Medicine Unit, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fei P, Shehata-Dieler W, Huestegge L, Hagen R, Kühn H. Longitudinal Development of Verbal and Nonverbal Intelligence After Cochlear Implantation According to Wechsler Tests in German-speaking Children: A Preliminary Study. Ear Hear 2023; 44:264-275. [PMID: 36163636 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intelligence as a construct of cognitive abilities is the basis of knowledge and skill acquisition and the main predictor of academic achievement. As a broad construct, it is usually divided into subdomains, such as nonverbal and verbal intelligence. Verbal intelligence is one domain of intelligence but is not synonymous with specific linguistic abilities like grammar proficiency. We aim to address the general expectation that early cochlear implantation enables children who are hard of hearing to develop comprehensively, including with respect to verbal intelligence. The primary purpose of this study is to trace the longitudinal development of verbal and nonverbal intelligence in children with cochlear implants (CIs). DESIGN Sixteen children with congenital hearing loss who received unilateral or bilateral implants and completed at least two intelligence assessments around the age of school entrance were included in the study. The first assessment was performed around 3 years after CI fitting (chronological age range: 3.93 to 7.03 years). The second assessment was performed approximately 2 years after the first assessment. To analyze verbal and nonverbal IQ in conjunction and across children at different ages, we used corresponding standardized and normalized tests from the same test family (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence and/or Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children). RESULTS Regarding longitudinal development, both verbal and nonverbal IQ increased, but verbal IQ increased more substantially over time. At the time of the second measurement, verbal and nonverbal IQ were on a comparable level. Nevertheless, we also observed strong inter-individual differences. The duration between both assessments was significantly associated with verbal IQ at the second measurement time point and thus with verbal IQ gain over time. Education mode (regular vs. special kindergarten/school) was significantly correlated with nonverbal IQ at the second assessment time point. CONCLUSIONS The results, despite the small sample size, clearly suggest that children with CIs can achieve intellectual abilities comparable to those of their normal-hearing peers by around the third year after initial CI fitting, and they continue to improve over the following 2 years. We recommend further research focusing on verbal IQ assessed around the age of school entrance to be used as a predictor for further development and for the establishment of an individual educational program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peipei Fei
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Wafaa Shehata-Dieler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Lynn Huestegge
- Department of Psychology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Heike Kühn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Y, Zhang W, Yang Y, Liu B, Chen M, Liu W, Li B, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Ni X. Developmental performance among pediatric candidates for cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2021; 141:66-72. [PMID: 33063574 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1821914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Developmental evaluation of deaf children before cochlear implantation (CI) has not been given enough attention. OBJECTIVES This study was designed to evaluate the comprehensive developmental performance of deaf children who are CI candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS The medical records of pediatric candidates for CI were reviewed. Five hundred children (287 boys; median age: 21.00 months; range: 6-72 months) with a diagnosis of severe-to-profound hearing loss were included. Preoperative developmental evaluation, including gross motor, fine motor, adaptability, language and social skill were retrieved. Comprehensive developmental performances including verbal and nonverbal skill were assessed. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to analyze the related developmental factors. RESULTS Compared with normal developmental metrics, deaf children had developmental delay (p < .001), which occurred in not only the verbal but also nonverbal skill (all p < .05). Of the 500 deaf children, 50 (10%) had normal performance; the majority (51.6%) had mild neurological dysfunction. Of all the sub-developments, language developed worst (normal rate: 4.2%) and gross motor developed best (normal rate: 42%). Age of intervention was a risk factor for the developmental level of deaf children (β = -0.340, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS Pediatric candidates for CI had both verbal and nonverbal developmental delay. Age of intervention was a risk factor for the developmental level. SIGNIFICANCE Comprehensive developmental evaluation of deaf children before cochlear implantation (CI) should be paid enough attention. Early intervention for improving hearing was of significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhong Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wanxia Zhang
- Department of Health Care, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Bing Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Bei Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Ni
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pantelemon C, Necula V, Berghe AS, Livinț-Popa L, Palade S, Văcăraș V, Mureșanu IA, Strilciuc Ș, Mureșanu FD. Neurodevelopmental Aspects and Cortical Auditory Maturation in Children with Cochlear Implants. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56070344. [PMID: 32668569 PMCID: PMC7404556 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56070344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: The cochlear implant is not only meant to restore auditory function, but it also has a series of benefits on the psychomotor development and on the maturation of central auditory pathways. In this study, with the help of neuropsychological tests and cortical auditory potentials (CAEPs), we intend to identify a series of instruments that allow us to monitor children with a cochlear implant, and later on, to admit them into an individualized rehabilitation program. Materials and methods: This is a longitudinal study containing 17 subjects (6 boys and 11 girls) diagnosed with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. The average age for cochlear implantation in our cohort is 22 months old. Each child was tested before the cochlear implantation, tested again 3 months after the implant, and then 6 months after the implant. To test the general development, we used the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST II). CAEPs were recorded to assess the maturation of central auditory pathways. Results: The results showed there was progress in both general development and language development, with a significant statistical difference between the overall DQ (developmental quotient) and language DQ before the cochlear implantation and three and six months later, respectively. Similarly, CAEP measurements revealed a decrease of positive-going component (P1) latency after cochlear implantation. Conclusion: CAEPs and neuropsychological tests prove to be useful instruments for monitoring the progress in patients with cochlear implants during the rehabilitation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Pantelemon
- Department of Neurosciences, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400486 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (C.P.); (L.L.-P.); (V.V.); (I.A.M.); (F.D.M.)
- “RoNeuro” Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400364 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Violeta Necula
- Department of ENT, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400486 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Alexandra-Stefania Berghe
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Livia Livinț-Popa
- Department of Neurosciences, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400486 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (C.P.); (L.L.-P.); (V.V.); (I.A.M.); (F.D.M.)
- “RoNeuro” Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400364 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Steluța Palade
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Children’s Emergency Hospital Cluj-Napoca, 400378 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Vitalie Văcăraș
- Department of Neurosciences, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400486 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (C.P.); (L.L.-P.); (V.V.); (I.A.M.); (F.D.M.)
- “RoNeuro” Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400364 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ioana Anamaria Mureșanu
- Department of Neurosciences, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400486 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (C.P.); (L.L.-P.); (V.V.); (I.A.M.); (F.D.M.)
- “RoNeuro” Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400364 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ștefan Strilciuc
- Department of Neurosciences, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400486 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (C.P.); (L.L.-P.); (V.V.); (I.A.M.); (F.D.M.)
- “RoNeuro” Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400364 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Correspondence:
| | - Fior-Dafin Mureșanu
- Department of Neurosciences, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400486 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (C.P.); (L.L.-P.); (V.V.); (I.A.M.); (F.D.M.)
- “RoNeuro” Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400364 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Early general development and central auditory system maturation in children with cochlear implants - A case series. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 126:109625. [PMID: 31442872 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A cochlear implant (CI) has the potential to improve the functioning of a deaf child in many aspects. Nevertheless, the dynamics of the general development, beyond the typically measured language abilities, directly after CI, is still unknown, especially if a child is implanted early. In this study we present a methodological framework for assessment of different domains of development, as well as the central auditory nervous system (CANS) maturation in infants and toddlers with a CI. METHODS Three children with bilateral congenital hearing loss and a unilateral CI, aged below 2.5 years, participated in a longitudinal study. Children were tested at three time points after cochlear implantation using the Polish Children Development Scale (CDS) consisting of a comprehensive battery of tests, as well as recordings of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials (CAEP). RESULTS All three children revealed gradual improvement in the overall CDS result as well as most of the CDS subscales. After 9 months of CI experience two younger children showed age-appropriate performance. In CAEP measurements a decrease of latency of the P1 component (an established biomarker of cortical auditory maturation) was observed in the same two children, with one achieving normal ranges of P1 latency after 9 months of CI use. CONCLUSIONS Our novel methodological framework can be successfully applied in small children with cochlear implants. It contributes to better understanding of the general development in early implanted children. The preliminary results indicate variability in children's performance in various developmental domains and thus the need to monitor the development of each child individually and holistically.
Collapse
|