Long-term follow-up with mention of complications in pediatric microvascular mandibular reconstruction

Long-Term Update: Free Fibula Flap Growth After Pediatric Mandibular Reconstruction

A free fibular flap is commonly used in adult mandibular reconstruction; however, its use in the pediatric population is not strongly supported. The authors are reporting the long-term update of a case of a pediatric patient who underwent a mandibular reconstruction using a free fibular flap after a resection of mandibular desmoid fibromatosis. Greatest growth was objectively measured and demonstrated at the condyle using a 3-dimensional model generated from Materialise software. This is 1 case and subsequent studies should be observed to further elucidate the full growth potential of the mandible in pediatric patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction.

Outcomes in Pediatric Maxillofacial Reconstruction With Vascularized Fibular Flaps: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the complications and outcomes after maxillofacial reconstruction using the free fibular flap in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A systematic review and descriptive analysis were conducted using data variables, including study characteristics; patient characteristics; postoperative complications (major and minor); surgical revision; and dental rehabilitation.

RESULTS

The systematic review resulted in 1622 articles, 55 of which met inclusion criteria for this study. The 55 articles consisted of 17 case series and 38 case reports with level III/IV and level V of evidence, respectively. Of the 155 identified pediatric patients, the rate of major complications was 13.5% and minor complications was 24.5%. The most common complication was mild growth distortion (n = 7) at the recipient site. Complications at the donor site were less common. During follow-up, 29 patients (18.7%) underwent or awaited surgical revision, and 43 patients (27.7%) underwent or awaited dental rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the free fibular flap for pediatric maxillofacial reconstruction is safe and reliable. Additionally, surgical revision to correct the functional impairments resulting from primary reconstruction using the free fibular flap is relatively common.

Unique Techniques Utilizing Rib Grafts for Mandibular Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric mandibular reconstruction requires a grafted segment of sufficient height and stability to support dental implant placement. Double barreling and mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) after reconstruction are two techniques to achieve this, but they have only been reported with fibular grafts. Rib grafts not only have a lower donor site morbidity than fibular grafts, but they also provide adequate defect coverage in children. As such, we propose their use with either a double barrel technique or with MDO.

METHODS

Three pediatric patients underwent mandibular resection and reconstruction using rib grafting. One patient underwent single rib graft placement with subsequent vertical rib distraction. In the remaining two patients, a double-barreled rib technique was used, stacked horizontally in one patient and vertically in the other.

RESULTS

From March 2018 to May 2019, three patients with an average age of 11 underwent resection of mandibular tumors or tumor-like lesions followed by immediate reconstruction with rib graft. Due to postoperative wound complications, the graft was completely removed in one patient. The remaining two patients had an uneventful recovery with dental implants planned for one and fully osseointegrated in the other. None of the patients experienced donor-site complications.

CONCLUSION

This case series supports the utility and versatility of autogenous rib grafts as a reconstructive option in children. Not only is rib an excellent bone source with low donor site morbidity, but its height can be augmented through MDO or double barreling, facilitating the successful placement of implants and oral rehabilitation in pediatric patients.

Pediatric Malignant Mandibular Tumors: Personal Experience and Literature Options Discussion

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular defects reconstruction could result challenging in childhood, due to facial and mandibular growth patterns. For these reasons, the choice of the most suitable reconstructive option in pediatric patients, affected by mandibular malignancies, still objects of debate.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare our reconstructive schedules to the existing literature in order to give a personal contribute to the present panorama.

METHODS

We performed, in October 2019, a retrospective evaluation of pediatric patients treated for biopsy-proven mandibular malignancies at our Institute between January 2013 and December 2016. All of them received multimodal therapy in accordance with standard guidelines and their demographic, clinical, treatment, and outcome parameters were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

We observed a shorter duration of surgery, a faster tracheostomy tube and feeding-tube removal, and a minor hospitalization in patients who received grafts transfer compared to those who underwent microsurgical mandibular reconstruction. After a 36-month period of follow-up, osteochondral grafts showed a pattern of growth similar to the mandibular epiphysis (condilylion-gonion linear and vertical ratio ranging to 0.96-1.03 and 1-1.02 at orthopantomogram, respectively). No bone consolidation delays and functional impairment were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Free flaps mandibular reconstruction in children needs to be better assessed and proximal fibular epiphyseal free flap indication might deserve further studies. Osteochondral grafts find indication for lateral defects, 50-55 mm in maximum length and located in the mandibular ramus, without massive teeth or soft tissue defect. Condyle involvement does not represent an absolute contraindication to rib graft use.

Pediatric Mandible Reconstruction: Controversies and Considerations

Mandibular reconstruction in pediatric patients has some unique considerations. The method of reconstruction has to factor in the growth potential of the neo-mandible, the native mandible, and the donor site. The condyle is considered the main growth center of the mandible. Current literature indicates that fibula, iliac crest, and scapula osseous flaps do not have the ability to grow. Costochondral grafts exhibit growth because of the costal cartilage component, although the growth is unpredictable. Preservation of the mandibular periosteum can result in spontaneous bone regeneration. Fibula bone harvest in a child mandates close follow-up till skeletal maturity, to monitor for ankle instability and valgus deformity. Dental rehabilitation maintains occlusal relationships, which promotes normal maxillary development. Elective hardware removal should be considered to facilitate future dental implant placement and possible revision procedures. After completion of growth, if occlusion or symmetry is not satisfactory, secondary procedures can be performed, including distraction osteogenesis, orthognathic-type bone sliding operations, and segmental ostectomy.

Infantile myofibromatosis treated by mandibulectomy and staged reconstruction with submental flap and free fibula flap: a case report

BACKGROUND

Infantile myofibromatosis is the most common benign fibrous tumor in infants. Three different types have been reported in the literature. The most commonly affected areas are the head, the neck and the trunk. Our patient showed a very high level of mandibular destruction resistant to all mandibular sparing treatment strategies requiring segmental mandibulectomy and complex reconstruction.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a rare case of multicentric infantile myofibromatosis with mandibular bone destruction. The treatment required a succession of chemotherapy, a subtotal transoral resection and a hemi-mandibulectomy. The mandibular reconstruction was staged with initial bridging titanium plate with a submental flap, followed later by a fibula free flap.

CONCLUSION

Mandibular involvement by myofibromatosis is rare, and the extend of bone destruction and reconstruction make this case unique. To our knowledge, this is the only reported case of fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction in a patient with infantile myofibromatosis , as well as one of the youngest reported submental island flaps for any pathology. We describe the clinical presentation and management, including relevant imaging, histopathology, medical and surgical treatment as well as a review of relevant literature.