1
|
Kaplan-Neeman R, Greenbom T, Habiballah S, Henkin Y. Biomarkers of auditory cortical plasticity and development of binaural pathways in children with unilateral hearing loss using a hearing aid. Hear Res 2024; 451:109096. [PMID: 39116708 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Congenital or early-onset unilateral hearing loss (UHL) can disrupt the normal development of the auditory system. In extreme cases of UHL (i.e., single sided deafness), consistent cochlear implant use during sensitive periods resulted in cortical reorganization that partially reversed the detrimental effects of unilateral sensory deprivation. There is a gap in knowledge, however, regarding cortical plasticity i.e. the brain's capacity to adapt, reorganize, and develop binaural pathways in milder degrees of UHL rehabilitated by a hearing aid (HA). The current study was set to investigate early-stage cortical processing and electrophysiological manifestations of binaural processing by means of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to speech sounds, in children with moderate to severe-to-profound UHL using a HA. Fourteen children with UHL (CHwUHL), 6-14 years old consistently using a HA for 3.5 (±2.3) years participated in the study. CAEPs were elicited to the speech sounds /m/, /g/, and /t/ in three listening conditions: monaural [Normal hearing (NH), HA], and bilateral [BI (NH + HA)]. Results indicated age-appropriate CAEP morphology in the NH and BI listening conditions in all children. In the HA listening condition: (1) CAEPs showed similar morphology to that found in the NH listening condition, however, the mature morphology observed in older children in the NH listening condition was not evident; (2) P1 was elicited in all but two children with severe-to-profound hearing loss, to at least one speech stimuli, indicating effective audibility; (3) A significant mismatch in timing and synchrony between the NH and HA ear was found; (4) P1 was sensitive to the acoustic features of the eliciting stimulus and to the amplification characteristics of the HA. Finally, a cortical binaural interaction component (BIC) was derived in most children. In conclusion, the current study provides first-time evidence for cortical plasticity and partial reversal of the detrimental effects of moderate to severe-to-profound UHL rehabilitated by a HA. The derivation of a cortical biomarker of binaural processing implies that functional binaural pathways can develop when sufficient auditory input is provided to the affected ear. CAEPs may thus serve as a clinical tool for assessing, monitoring, and managing CHwUHL using a HA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricky Kaplan-Neeman
- Department of Communication Disorders, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Tzvia Greenbom
- Department of Communication Disorders, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Suhaill Habiballah
- Department of Communication Disorders, Haifa University, Haifa, Israel; Alango Technologies LTD, Tirat Carmel, Israel
| | - Yael Henkin
- Department of Communication Disorders, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bogdanov C, Mulders WH, Goulios H, Távora-Vieira D. The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2023; 29:96-106. [PMID: 37690449 PMCID: PMC10994594 DOI: 10.1159/000533273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hearing loss is a major global public health issue that negatively impacts quality of life, communication, cognition, social participation, and mental health. The cochlear implant (CI) is the most efficacious treatment for severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, variability in outcomes remains high among CI users. Our previous research demonstrated that the existing subjective methodology of CI programming does not consistently produce optimal stimulation for speech perception, thereby limiting the potential for CI users to derive the maximum device benefit to achieve their peak potential. We demonstrated the benefit of utilising the objective method of measuring auditory-evoked cortical responses to speech stimuli as a reliable tool to guide and verify CI programming and, in turn, significantly improve speech perception performance. The present study was designed to investigate the impact of patient- and device-specific factors on the application of acoustically-evoked cortical auditory-evoked potential (aCAEP) measures as an objective clinical tool to verify CI mapping in adult CI users with bilateral deafness (BD). METHODS aCAEP responses were elicited using binaural peripheral auditory stimulation for four speech tokens (/m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/) and recorded by HEARLab™ software in adult BD CI users. Participants were classified into groups according to subjective or objective CI mapping procedures to elicit present aCAEP responses to all four speech tokens. The impact of patient- and device-specific factors on the presence of aCAEP responses and speech perception was investigated between participant groups. RESULTS Participants were categorised based on the presence or absence of the P1-N1-P2 aCAEP response to speech tokens. Out of the total cohort of adult CI users (n = 132), 63 participants demonstrated present responses pre-optimisation, 37 participants exhibited present responses post-optimisation, and the remaining 32 participants either showed an absent response for at least one speech token post-optimisation or did not accept the optimised CI map adjustments. Overall, no significant correlation was shown between patient and device-specific factors and the presence of aCAEP responses or speech perception scores. CONCLUSION This study reinforces that aCAEP measures offer an objective, non-invasive approach to verify CI mapping, irrespective of patient or device factors. These findings further our understanding of the importance of personalised CI rehabilitation through CI mapping to minimise the degree of speech perception variation post-CI and allow all CI users to achieve maximum device benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caris Bogdanov
- School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Helen Goulios
- School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, WA, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yiannos JM, Bester CW, Zhao C, Gell B, Jayakody DMP. Speech-in-noise performance in objectively determined cochlear implant maps, including the effect of cognitive state. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286986. [PMID: 37315077 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cochlear Implant (CI) programming based on subjective psychophysical fine-tuning of loudness scaling involves active participation and cognitive skills and thus may not be appropriate for difficult-to-condition populations. The electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) is an objective measure that is suggested to provide clinical benefit to CI programming. This study aimed to compare speech reception outcomes between subjective and eSRT objectively determined CI maps for adult MED-EL recipients. The effect of cognitive skills on these skills was further assessed. METHODS Twenty-seven post lingually hearing-impaired MED-EL CI recipients were recruited, 6 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI- 4 male, 79 years ± 5), 21 with normal cognitive function (5 male, 63 years ± 12). Two MAPs were generated: a subjective MAP and an objective MAP in which eSRTs determined maximum comfortable levels (M-Levels). Participants were randomly divided into two groups. Group A trialled the objective MAP for two weeks before returning for outcome assessment. During the following two weeks, Group A trialled the subjective MAP before returning for outcome assessment. Group B trialled MAPs in reverse. Outcome measures included the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI), Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word test, and Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise (BKB-SIN) test. RESULTS eSRT based MAPS were obtained in 23 of the participants. A strong relationship was demonstrated between global charge between eSRT-based and psychophysical-based M-Levels (r = 0.89, p < .001). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the Hearing Impaired (MoCA-HI) testing identified 6 CI recipients with MCI (MoCA-HI total score ≤23). The MCI group was older (63, 79 years), but were not otherwise different in sex, duration of hearing loss or duration of CI use. For all patients, no significant differences were found for sound quality or speech in quiet scores between eSRT-based and psychophysical-based MAPs. However, psychophysically determined MAPs showed significantly better speech-in-noise reception (6.74 vs 8.20-dB SNR, p = .34). MoCA-HI scores showed a significant, moderate negative correlation with BKB SIN for both MAP approaches (Kendall's Tau B, p = .015 and p = .008), with no effect on the difference between MAP approaches. CONCLUSION Results indicate eSRT-based methods provide poorer outcomes than psychophysical-based method. While speech-in-noise reception is correlated with MoCA-HI score, this affected both behaviourally and objectively determined MAPs. The results suggest fair confidence in the eSRT-based method as a guide for setting M-Level for difficult-to-condition CI populations in simple listening conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Yiannos
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christofer W Bester
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher Zhao
- School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Barbara Gell
- MED-EL Australasia, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dona M P Jayakody
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
- Centre for Ear Sciences, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Western Australian Centre for Health & Ageing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yaar-Soffer Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Greenbom T, Habiballah S, Shapira Y, Henkin Y. A cortical biomarker of audibility and processing efficacy in children with single-sided deafness using a cochlear implant. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3533. [PMID: 36864095 PMCID: PMC9981742 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30399-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The goals of the current study were to evaluate audibility and cortical speech processing, and to provide insight into binaural processing in children with single-sided deafness (CHwSSD) using a cochlear implant (CI). The P1 potential to acoustically-presented speech stimuli (/m/, /g/, /t/) was recorded during monaural [Normal hearing (NH), CI], and bilateral (BIL, NH + CI) listening conditions within a clinical setting in 22 CHwSSD (mean age at CI/testing 4.7, 5.7 years). Robust P1 potentials were elicited in all children in the NH and BIL conditions. In the CI condition: (1) P1 prevalence was reduced yet was elicited in all but one child to at least one stimulus; (2) P1 latency was prolonged and amplitude was reduced, consequently leading to absence of binaural processing manifestations; (3) Correlation between P1 latency and age at CI/testing was weak and not significant; (4) P1 prevalence for /m/ was reduced and associated with CI manufacturer and duration of CI use. Results indicate that recording CAEPs to speech stimuli in clinical settings is feasible and valuable for the management of CHwSSD. While CAEPs provided evidence for effective audibility, a substantial mismatch in timing and synchrony of early-stage cortical processing between the CI and NH ear remains a barrier for the development of binaural interaction components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y. Yaar-Soffer
- grid.413795.d0000 0001 2107 2845Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621 Ramat Gan, Israel ,grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Department of Communication Disorders, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - R. Kaplan-Neeman
- grid.413795.d0000 0001 2107 2845Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621 Ramat Gan, Israel ,grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Department of Communication Disorders, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - T. Greenbom
- grid.413795.d0000 0001 2107 2845Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621 Ramat Gan, Israel ,grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Department of Communication Disorders, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - S. Habiballah
- grid.18098.380000 0004 1937 0562Department of Communication Disorders, Haifa University, Haifa, Israel ,grid.471000.2Alango Technologies LTD, Tirat Carmel, Israel
| | - Y. Shapira
- grid.413795.d0000 0001 2107 2845Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Y. Henkin
- grid.413795.d0000 0001 2107 2845Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621 Ramat Gan, Israel ,grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Department of Communication Disorders, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Távora-Vieira D, Wedekind A, Ffoulkes E, Voola M, Marino R. Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users: An objective method to improve speech perception. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274643. [PMID: 36206248 PMCID: PMC9543874 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate if cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) measures can be used to verify the cochlear implant (CI) map and consequently improve CI outcomes in adults with bilateral hearing loss. DESIGN CAEPs were measured in CI recipients using the speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/ and /s/. If CAEP responses were present for all speech tokens, the participant's map was considered "satisfactory". If CAEP responses were absent, the CI map was considered "unsatisfactory" and therefore adjusted and CAEP measures repeated. This was repeated until auditory potentials were seen in response to all four speech tokens. Speech testing was conducted pre-CI, as well as before and after CAEP-guided map adjustments. RESULTS 108 adult unilateral CI users participated, whose sound processors were previously programmed using subjective methods. 42 CI users elicited a CAEP response to all four speech tokens and therefore no further mapping adjustments were made. 66 subjected lacked a CAEP response to at least one speech token and had their CI map adjusted accordingly. Of those, 31 showed a CAEP response to all four speech tokens, and the average speech score significantly improved after CI map adjustments based on CAEP responses. CONCLUSION CAEP's are an objective tool that can be used to guide and verify CI mapping in adults CI users. Significant improvement in speech scores was observed in participants who had their CI map adjusted based on CAEP responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Andre Wedekind
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Ellen Ffoulkes
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marcus Voola
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Roberta Marino
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Single-Sided Deafness: Using Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential to Improve Cochlear Implant Fitting. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e976-e983. [PMID: 36040051 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate if acoustic cortical auditory evoked potential (aCAEP) measures can be used to verify the cochlear implant (CI) map and consequently improve auditory outcomes in adults with single-sided deafness (SSD). DESIGN aCAEPs were measured in SSD-CI recipients using speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/. If aCAEP responses were present for all speech tokens at the outset, no map adjustments were implemented. If aCAEP responses were absent for one or more tokens, the map was adjusted until aCAEPs were observed for all four tokens. Speech in noise testing using BKB-SiN was performed before and after aCAEP recording. The results of the speech testing results at presurgery, 6, 12, and 24 months post-CI were also analyzed. RESULTS Sixty-seven CI users with SSD participated in this study. All CIs had been mapped according to the conventional subjective loudness perception method. Twenty-three SSD-CI users exhibited an aCAEP response for all four speech tokens and were therefore considered optimized at outset. Forty-four participants lacked an aCAEP response from at least one speech token and had their most comfortable levels adjusted accordingly. Of these, map adjustments allowed aCAEPs to be elicited for all four speech tokens in 23 individuals. Speech in noise testing significantly improved pre- to post-aCAEP-based adjustment. CONCLUSION aCAEP recordings were successfully used to verify CI mapping and improve resultant speech outcomes in SSD-CI users.
Collapse
|
7
|
Di Berardino F, Cavicchiolo S, Del Carmen Fuentes M, Kontides A, Lauss K, Zanetti D. Maximum acceptable level for the determination of ECAP and ESRT in a paediatric population. Cochlear Implants Int 2022; 23:214-224. [PMID: 35380097 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2054097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Two of the most used objective measures are electrically evoked action potentials (ECAPs) and electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds (ESRTs). Although stimuli used for these measures differ considerably, both measures are influenced by subjective loudness percept. We focus on the subjective maximum acceptable loudness (MAL) to investigate if loudness sensitivity varied along the electrode array during ECAP recordings. In addition, we explored how the MAL reached during an ECAP recording related to the postoperative ESRT. METHODS Uni- and bilaterally implanted young CI users (n = 15, average age = 9 y, age range 3-18 y) underwent ECAP and ESR recordings using the clinical software MAESTRO (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) and a commercially available immittance instrument (PATH MEDICAL GmbH, Germering, Germany). RESULTS Loudness tolerance during ECAP recordings was lowest at the two apical-most electrode contacts (number 1 and 2). There was a moderate correlation between the MAL achieved during ECAP recordings and ESR maximum stimulation amplitudes. (r: 0.44344). CONCLUSIONS ECAP recordings should commence at basal or medial contacts to increase the users' comfort and loudness tolerance, especially in young CI users. A higher maximum stimulation appears to increase the chance of the automatic determination of ECAP thresholds for all electrode contacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Di Berardino
- Audiology Unit, Dept of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, State University of Milano and Dept. of Specialistic Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Sara Cavicchiolo
- Audiology Unit, Dept of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, State University of Milano and Dept. of Specialistic Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Diego Zanetti
- Audiology Unit, Dept of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, State University of Milano and Dept. of Specialistic Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary goal of the study was to investigate electrical cortical auditory evoked potentials (eCAEPs) at maximum comfortable level (MCL) and 50% MCL on three cochlear implant (CI) electrodes and compare them with the acoustic CAEP (aCAEPs), in terms of the amplitude and latency of the P1-N1-P2 complex. This was achieved by comparing the eCAEP obtained with the method described and stimulating single electrodes, via the fitting software spanning the cochlear array and the aCAEP obtained using the HEARLab system at four speech tokens. DESIGN Twenty MED-EL (MED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria) CI adult users were tested. CAEP recording with HEARLab System was performed with speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/ in free field, presented at 55 dB SPL. eCAEPs were recorded with an Evoked Potential device triggered from the MAX Programming Interface (MED-EL Medical Devices) with 70 msec electrical burst at 0.9 Hz at the apical (1), middle (6), and basal (10 or 11) CI electrode at their MCL and 50% MCL. RESULTS CAEP responses were recorded in 100% of the test subjects for the speech token /t/, 95% for the speech tokens /g/ and /s/, and 90% for the speech token /m/. For eCAEP recordings, in all subjects, it was possible to identify N1 and P2 peaks when stimulating the apical and middle electrodes. This incidence of detection decreased to an 85% chance of stimulation at 50% MCL on the same electrodes. A P1 peak was less evident for all electrodes. There was an overall increase in latency for stimulation at 50% MCL compared with MCL. There was a significant difference in the amplitude of adjacent peaks (P1-N1 and N1-P2) for 50% MCL compared with MCL. The mean of the maximum cross-correlation values were in the range of 0.63 to 0.68 for the four speech tokens. The distribution of the calculated time shift, where the maximum of the cross-correlation was found, was distributed between the speech tokens. The speech token /g/ had the highest number of valid cross-correlations, while the speech token /s/ had the lowest number. CONCLUSIONS This study successfully compared aCAEP and eCAEP in CI users. Both acoustic and electrical P1-N1-P2 recordings obtained were clear and reliable, with good correlation. Latency increased with decreasing stimulation level, while amplitude decreased. eCAEP is potentially a better option to verify speech detection at the cortical level because it (1) uses direct stimulation and therefore creates less interference and delay of the sound processor and (2) creates more flexibility with the recording setup and stimulation setting. As such, eCAEP is an alternative method for CI optimization.
Collapse
|
9
|
Martins KVC, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Tsuji RK, Bento RF. Do the minimum and maximum comfortable stimulation levels influence the cortical potential latencies or the speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users? Hear Res 2021; 404:108206. [PMID: 33677193 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cochlear implants (CI) programming is based on both the measurement of the minimum levels required to stimulate the auditory nerve and the maximum levels to generate loud, yet comfortable loudness. Seeking for guidance in the adequacy of this programming, the cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) have been gaining space as an important tool in the evaluation of CI users, providing information on the central auditory system. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of mishandling of electrical stimulation levels on speech processor programming on hearing thresholds, speech recognition and cortical auditory evoked potential in adult CI users. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a prospective cross-sectional study, with a sample of adult unilateral CI users of both sexes, aged at least 18 years, post-lingual deafness, with minimum experience of 12 months of device use. Selected subjects should have average free field hearing thresholds with cochlear implant equal to or better than 34 dBHL and monosyllable recognition different from 0%. Individuals who could not collaborate with the procedures or who had no CAEP recordings were excluded. Participants were routinely programmed, and the map was named MO (optimized original map). Then three experimentally wrong maps were made: optimized original map with 10 current units below the maximum comfort level (C), named MC- (map minus C); optimized original map with minus 10 current units at minimum threshold level (T), named MT- (map minus T) and optimized original map with 10 current units above minimum level (T), named MT + (map plus T). In all programs, participants underwent free-field auditory thresholds from 250Hz to 6000Hz, recorded sentences and monosyllabic recognition tests presented at 65dB SPL in quiet and in noise, and free field CAEP evaluation. All tests were performed in an acoustically treated booth, in a randomized order of map presentation. Data were compared by Wilcoxon test. RESULTS Thirty individuals were selected and signed an informed consent form. The MC- map provided worsening of all free field thresholds, quiet and noise speech recognition, and P1 wave latency delay with significant difference from the results with the MO map. The MT- map worsened the hearing thresholds and statistically significantly reduced the P2 wave latency; MT+ map improved free field thresholds except 6000Hz, worsening speech recognition, without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that maximum levels below the optimal thresholds lead to worse cochlear implant performance in both hearing thresholds and speech recognition tests in quiet and noise, increasing CAEP component P1 latency. On the other hand, the manipulation of minimum threshold levels showed alteration in audibility without significant impact on speech recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Vasconcelos Chaves Martins
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil.
| | | | - Robinson Koji Tsuji
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Ferreira Bento
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaneshiro S, Hiraumi H, Sato H. Central processing of speech sounds and non-speech sounds with similar spectral distribution: An auditory evoked potential study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2020; 47:727-733. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
11
|
Wedekind A, Rajan G, Van Dun B, Távora-Vieira D. Restoration of cortical symmetry and binaural function: Cortical auditory evoked responses in adult cochlear implant users with single sided deafness. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227371. [PMID: 31935234 PMCID: PMC6959557 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness (SSD) is the only treatment option with the potential to restore binaural hearing cues. Significant binaural benefit has been measured in adults by speech in noise and localisation tests, who receive a cochlear implant for SSD, however, little is known on the cortical changes that help provide this benefit. In the present study, detection of sound in the auditory cortex, speech testing and localisation was used to investigate the ability of a cochlear implant (CI) to restore auditory cortical latencies and improve binaural benefit in the adult SSD population. Methods Twenty-nine adults with acquired single-sided deafness who received a CI in adulthood were studied. Speech perception in noise was tested using the Bamford-Kowal-Bench speech-in-noise test, localisation ability was measured using the auditory speech sounds evaluation (AδE) localisation test and cortical auditory evoked responses, comparing N1-P2 latencies recorded from the normal hearing ear and cochlear implant were used to investigate the synchrony of the cortical pathway from the CI and normal hearing ear (NHe) with binaural hearing function. Results There was a significant improvement in speech perception in noise in all spatial configurations S0/N0 (Z = -3.066, p<0.002), S0/NHE (Z = -4.031, p<0.001), SCI/NHE (Z = -3.851, p<0.001). Localization significantly improved when tested with the cochlear implant on (p<0.001) with a shorter duration of deafness correlating to a greater improvement in localisation ability F(1:18) = 6.854; p = 0.017). There was no significant difference in N1-P2 latency recorded from the normal hearing ear and the CI. Conclusion Cortical auditory evoked response latencies recorded from the CI and NHe showed no significant difference, indicating that the detection of sound in the auditory cortex occurred simultaneously, providing the cortex with auditory information for binaural hearing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Wedekind
- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Bram Van Dun
- The National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Automated analysis of bone-conduction cortical auditory evoked potential in normal-hearing neonates. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 87:290-297. [PMID: 31740284 PMCID: PMC9422526 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The cortical auditory evoked potential allows the possibility of objectively evaluating the entire auditory system, which is desirable in the pediatric population. Bone conduction auditory stimulation is recommended in the differential diagnosis of conductive hearing loss. However, there are not many studies of cortical auditory evoked potential using bone conduction. Objective The aim of this study was to characterize the response of cortical auditory evoked potential through bone conduction in normal-hearing neonates using an automated response analysis equipment. Methods This study included 30 normal-hearing neonates, without risk factors for hearing loss. The equipment used was the HEARlab automated response analysis and the cortical responses were evaluated at the frequencies of 500–4000 Hz through bone conduction, at intensity ranging from 0 to 60 dBnHL. The latencies and amplitudes were manually marked by experienced judges. Results Cortical auditory evoked potential responses were detected in 100% of the evaluated subjects and there was no difference regarding the cortical response of the neonates in relation to the variables of gender, ear and masking use. At an intensity of 60 dBnHL for the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz the latencies were 234; 241; 239 and 253 ms and the amplitudes were 15.6; 8.4; 6.2; 6.3 μV. The mean thresholds were 23.6; 28; 31 and 33.1 dBnHL, respectively. Conclusion It was possible to measure the cortical auditory evoked potential response in the neonatal population using bone vibrator as sound transducer and to draw the profile of the cortical auditory evoked potential latencies and amplitudes by frequencies at the intensity of 60 dBnHL and at the threshold.
Collapse
|