A comparison of morpho-syntactic abilities in deaf children with cochlear implant and 5-year-old normal-hearing children

Comprehension of clitic pronouns by children with cochlear implants: the role of sentence stress

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the role of sentence stress on the comprehension of sentences with clitic pronouns (unstressed morphemes and a typical feature of Romance languages) by children with cochlear implants (CIs).

METHODS

Thirteen children (seven girls) with CIs and 15 children (seven girls) with NH between eight and 12 years who are monolingual speakers of Brazilian Portuguese participated on a computerized sentence comprehension task that involved manipulation of stress placement of possible antecedent words to clitic pronouns.

RESULTS

Children with CIs were significantly less accurate than children with NH in comprehending sentences with clitics, regardless of sentence stress. For children with NH, stress on the correct antecedent significantly increased sentence comprehension accuracy. For children with CI, there was no significant effect of sentence stress on selecting the correct antecedent for clitic pronouns.

DISCUSSION

Comprehension of sentences with clitic pronouns is challenging for children with CIs and this challenge holds cross-linguistically. Furthermore, children with CIs do not use prosodic information to support comprehension of sentences with clitics similarly to NH children.

CONCLUSION

Language-specific syntactic, morphosyntactic, and prosodic contrasts affecting sentence comprehension need to be assessed in children with CIs to plan an effective intervention.

Long-term speech perception and morphosyntactic outcomes in adolescents and young adults implanted in childhood

BACKGROUND

Long-term assessments of children with cochlear implants (CI) are important inputs to help guide families and professionals in therapeutic and counselling processes. Based on these premises, the primary aim of the present study was to assess the long-term speech and language outcomes in a sample of prelingually deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral implantation in childhood. The secondary aim was to investigate the correlations of age at implantation with long-term speech and language outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective observational study on 54 long-term CI users, 33 unilateral and 21 bilateral (mean age at CI surgery 38.1 ± 24.6 months; mean age at last follow-up assessment 19.1 ± 4.3 years of age and mean follow-up time 16 ± 3.7 years). Means and standards were used to describe speech perception (in quiet, in fixed noise and in adaptive noise using It-Matrix) and morphosyntactic comprehension (TROG-2) outcomes. A univariate analysis was used to evaluate outcome differences between unilateral and bilateral patients. Bivariate analysis was performed to investigate the relationships between age at CI, audiological variables, and language outcomes. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed to quantify the relationship between It-Matrix, sentence recognition in quiet and at SNR+10 and TROG-2.

RESULTS

The participants showed good speech recognition performance in quiet (94% for words and 89% for sentences) whilst their speech-in-noise scores decreased significantly. For the It-Matrix, only 9.2% of the participants showed scores within the normative range. This value was 60% for TROG-2 performance. For both auditory and language skills, group differences for unilateral versus bilateral CI users were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Bivariate analysis showed that age at CI correlated significantly with overall results at TROG-2 (r = -0.6; p < 0.001) and with It-Matrix (r = 0.5; p < 0.001). TROG-2 was negatively correlated with results for It-Matrix (r = -0.5; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis with It-Matrix as a dependent variable, the model explained 63% of the variance, of which 60% was related to sentence recognition and 3% to morphosyntax.

CONCLUSIONS

These data contribute to the definition of average long-term outcomes expected in subjects implanted during childhood whilst increasing our knowledge of the effects of variables such as age at CI and morphosyntactic comprehension on speech perception. Although the majority of this prelingually DHH cohort did not achieve scores within a normative range, remarkably better It-Matrix scores were observed when compared to those from postlingually deafened adult CI users.

Language therapy outcomes in deaf children with cochlear implant using a new developed program: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implanted (CI) children have problems in most aspects of language and in particular with regards to grammar. Considering the lack of studies in the field of grammar treatment in CI children and bearing in the mind that CI children have the potential to develop language, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of treating grammar in CI children using a treatment grammar program.

METHODOLOGY

first, the literature related to grammar were reviewed so as to extract different grammatical components for developing grammar treatment program and to make sentences for each element as well as to compile a manual for its implementation. Second, the validity of the sentences was examined using the Delphi method. Third, grammar treatment was performed on five CI children. Persian Developmental Sentence Scoring(PDSS) and Mean Length of Utterance(MLU) were used to evaluate them before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Five grammatical classes were extracted, and the grammatical elements were classified in each category according to age. For all of the grammatical items, 2076 sentences were constructed. After applying the Delphi method, a total of 1936 sentences with Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) of 71%, remained. Using this program, grammar treatment was effective in all five children. The PDSS and MLU increased in all five children during the treatment phase, which was confirmed by Percentage of Non-overlapping Data (PND), Improvement Rate Difference (IRD). During the follow-up period, the children showed that they were able to maintain the trained components.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implants have the potential to learn language skills, and the present study confirms their ability to learn grammar, using a comprehensive grammar treatment program.

Effect of cochlear implantation on language development and assessment of the quality of studies in this field: A systematic review

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is an achievement that facilitates the acquisition of language skills in deaf children throughout the world. The use of this technology has a positive effect on all components of language acquisition (syntax, semantic, pragmatic, etc.). However, this positive impact is influenced by various factors. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of studies on the development of language abilities can help improve these studies. Consequently, in the future, it will lead to the improvement of language rehabilitation in these children. Limited studies on children with CI in have been done so far. This article summarized the outcomes of scientific articles on the clinical efficacy of CI on Persian speaking children. This study also provided a clear picture of these studies by examining the quality of their methodologies and tools.

Methods: Articles indexed in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus and Iranian databases (Danesh Gostar, Magiran, and SID) were searched using keywords "language," "Cochlear implant", "Persian/ Farsi" in English and Persian languages with "and/or". Original articles investigated on children younger than 13 years old with hearing impairment and CI were included.

Results: Five hundred and twenty-three articles were found based on the keywords. Among all of these, 485 were excluded due to the title and the abstract; we selected 38, of which 24 were repeated. Finally, 14 articles remained. We reviewed the articles based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and checklist and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE).

Conclusion: Similar to international studies, Persian speaking children with CI have slower language development than their peers with normal hearing, but they are better than their peers who use hearing aids. The results of reviewing on quality of the articles showed that the studies could not meet reasonable quality because of the lack of a standard test in different aspects of Persian language and the absence of patients’ databanks. These results also can be used by other nationalities that recently have started surveys on children with CIs.

Cluster production in speech of Persian-speaking cochlear implanted children

OBJECTIVE

This study is to examine the final cluster processing in Cochlear implanted child and compare the hearing age factor with the chronological age one.

INTRODUCTION

Scholars argue that, in a Cochlear Implanted (CI) child, the hearing age is the crucial factor in the speech rather than the chronological age. To determine which factor affects the production more, we examined the mastery of Persian final consonant clusters realization in CI children at one-to-two years of hearing experience and compared the result to Normal Hearing (NH) peers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study included 21 children in two categories of girls and boys. Using picture-naming task, we collected the data from participants.

RESULT

Data analysis showed that all the children used the same set of phonological rules at their developmental stages of word final consonant cluster but the distribution of preferences differed between the groups. In one hand, Cluster reduction was the most produced phonological rule in both groups and on the other hand, CI children preferred breathing, coalescence and cluster simplification more than NH children did. Considering Gender, unlike NH girls and boys who had the same trend in their phonological system, CI girls were closer to complete production rather than boys.

CONCLUSION

According to this survey, what seems to be important in speech production of CI children is years of hearing experience rather than chronological age. Girls tried different rules compared to boys for cluster production, but when the mastery over cluster production was achieved, there was no difference between girls and boys.