Value of DW-MRI in the preoperative evaluation of congenital cholesteatoma

Fusion computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging scans for pre-operative staging of congenital middle-ear cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if fusion computed tomography-diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging may have a role in the pre-operative assessment of congenital middle-ear cholesteatoma.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of surgically treated congenital middle-ear cholesteatoma patients over a 2-year timespan was conducted. Pre-operative staging was performed on computed tomography and fusion computed tomography-diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging based on extension of the disease according to the ChOLE classification system and the Potsic classification system. Intra-operative staging was compared to imaging findings to evaluate accuracy of the two imaging modalities in predicting congenital middle-ear cholesteatoma extent.

RESULTS

Computed tomography was able to correctly predict congenital middle-ear cholesteatoma extent in three out of six cases according to the ChOLE classification system, all of which were staged as Ch1a and Ch1b on pre-operative computed tomography. Cases in which computed tomography was not able correctly to determine congenital middle-ear cholesteatoma extent were staged as Ch3 on pre-operative computed tomography. Fusion scans correctly determined congenital middle-ear cholesteatoma extent in all cases according to the ChOLE classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Fusion computed tomography-diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging may be helpful in cases of congenital middle-ear cholesteatoma where pre-operative computed tomography shows mastoid and antrum opacification, in which computed tomography alone may overestimate cholesteatoma extension beyond the level of the lateral semi-circular canal.

Non-EPI versus Multishot EPI DWI in Cholesteatoma Detection: Correlation with Operative Findings

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although multishot EPI (readout-segmented EPI) has been touted as a robust DWI sequence for cholesteatoma evaluation, its efficacy in disease detection compared with a non-EPI (eg, HASTE) technique is unknown. This study sought to compare the accuracy of readout-segmented EPI with that of HASTE DWI in cholesteatoma detection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was completed of consecutive patients who underwent MR imaging for the evaluation of suspected primary or recurrent/residual cholesteatomas. Included patients had MR imaging examinations that included both HASTE and readout-segmented EPI sequences and confirmed cholesteatomas on a subsequent operation. Two neuroradiologist reviewers assessed all images, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. The ratio of signal intensity between the cerebellum and any observed lesion was noted.

RESULTS

Of 23 included patients, 12 (52.2%) were women (average age, 47.8 [SD, 25.2] years). All patients had surgically confirmed cholesteatomas: Six (26.1%) were primary and 17 (73.9%) were recidivistic. HASTE images correctly identified cholesteatomas in 100.0% of patients. On readout-segmented EPI sequences, 16 (69.6%) were positive, 5 (21.7%) were equivocal, and 2 (8.7%) were falsely negative. Excellent interobserver agreement was noted between reviews on both HASTE (κ = 1.0) and readout-segmented EPI (κ = 0.9) sequences. The average signal intensity ratio was significantly higher on HASTE than in readout-segmented EPI, facilitating enhanced detection (mean difference 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

HASTE outperforms readout-segmented EPI in the detection of primary cholesteatoma and disease recidivism.

Novel Radiologic Approaches for Cholesteatoma Detection: Implications for Endoscopic Ear Surgery

Technological advancement in computed tomography (CT) and MRI has improved cholesteatoma detection rates considerably in the past decade. Accurately predicting disease location and extension is essential for staging, planning, and preoperative counseling, in particular in the newer approach of endoscopic ear surgery. Improved sensitivity and specificity of these radiological methods may allow the surgeon to confidently monitor patients, therefore avoiding unnecessary surgery. This article outlines recent advances in CT and MRI technology and advantages and disadvantages of the newer techniques. Emphasis on improving the feedback loop between the radiologist and surgeon will increase the accuracy of these new technologies.