1
|
Foda HMT, El Abany A. A Novel Ear Cartilage Caudal Septal Extension Graft. Facial Plast Surg 2023; 39:408-416. [PMID: 36630985 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
In cases of weak or deficient caudal septum, the caudal septum extension graft (CSEG) is the most commonly used reconstructive method. In the current study we introduce a newly-designed conchal cartilage CSEG and evaluate its cosmetic and functional outcomes. The graft has an average length of 3 ± 0.3 cm and composed of a distal double-layered part, which is 3 to 4 mm wide and a proximal single-layered part, which is 1.2 to 1.7 cm wide. The graft design allows the proximal single-layered part to be fixed on either sides of the caudal septum while keeping the distal double-layered segment in the midline. The study included 230 patients, of which 83% were revisions, all patients completed a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaire pre- and postoperatively. The PROMs used were either the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) survey or the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS). During the mean follow-up period of 18.2 months (range: 9-192 months) no serious complications were encountered and only six cases (2.3%) required minor revisions of the CSEG.Using the proposed conchal cartilage, CSEG resulted in an improved cosmetic and functional outcome as evidenced by the significant postoperative improvement in the NOSE, SCHNOS-O, and SCHNOS-C scores with a p-value <0.001, <0.05, and <0.0001, respectively. The graft provided adequate tensile strength and support to the nasal tip, which resulted in improved tip projection, rotation, definition, and symmetry, while maintaining a degree of flexibility and elasticity which is much more than that of the rib or even the septum thus resulting in the most natural feel of the nasal tip lobule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossam M T Foda
- Department of Otolaryngology, Alexandria Medical School, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ahmed El Abany
- Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wei H, Xu X, Wan T, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Liang Y. Correction of narrow nostril deformity secondary to cleft lip: indications for different surgical methods and a retrospective study. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1156275. [PMID: 37206975 PMCID: PMC10188927 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1156275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) can lead to severe nasolabial deformities that significantly affect the appearance of the patient. Among all types of nasolabial deformities, narrow nostril deformities are the most troublesome, causing poor and unstable surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to develop an algorithm for surgical method selection for revision of narrow nostril deformities secondary to CLP based on retrospective clinical data. Materials and methods Patients with narrow nostril deformities secondary to CLP were enrolled in the study. Before surgery, patients' clinical data were collected and the width of the nasal floor and the length of the alar rim were measured. Surgical methods were determined according to the measurements. After surgery, a nostril retainer was applied for 6 months to consolidate and maintain the nostril shape. The surgical method and postsurgical changes were recorded for the final summary of the algorithm to select surgical methods for narrow nostril deformities. Results The data from 9 patients were analyzed. According to the width of the nasal floor and the length of the alar rim, correct surgical methods were determined. Four patients received nasolabial skin flaps to widen the soft tissue of the nasal floor. Three patients received upper lip scar tissue flaps to treat the narrow nasal floor. For the short alar rim, free alar composite tissue flap or narrowing of the nostril of the noncleft side was recommended. Conclusion The width of the nasal floor and the length of the alar rim are critical elements to consider when selecting the correct surgical method for revising narrow nostril deformities secondary to CLP. The proposed algorithm provides a reference for selecting surgical methods in future clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongpu Wei
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaofeng Xu
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - Teng Wan
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - Yusheng Yang
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Zhang
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Correspondence: Yong Zhang Yilai Wu Yun Liang
| | - Yilai Wu
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Correspondence: Yong Zhang Yilai Wu Yun Liang
| | - Yun Liang
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
- Correspondence: Yong Zhang Yilai Wu Yun Liang
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang C, Jin TT, Li JY, Yan S, Zhao Y, Pan L, Sun Y. Application of Conchal Cartilage Grafts in Nasal Tip Plasty: Comparison and Experience of 3 Methods. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:S199-S207. [PMID: 33443878 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The autologous conchal cartilage of good elasticity is easy to harvest, thus is often used in nasal tip plasty of East Asians. However, the operation techniques vary a lot among different surgeons. This article aims to introduce 3 techniques commonly used in clinical practice. METHODS One hundred three patients were included in this study and divided into 3 groups according to the shape of the nasal tip during 2017 to 2019. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months. All patients were measured with Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS). ImageJ software was used to measure and calculate the projection ratio for lateral position standard image, and columella-labial angle (CLA) was measured. RESULTS In group 1, SCHNOS for nasal obstruction (SCHNOS-O) score were 13.23 ± 7.61 and 14.49 ± 10.55 (P > 0.05); SCHNOS for nasal cosmesis (SCHNOS-C) score were 66.55 ± 31.23 and 21.73 ± 18.91 (P < 0.001); projection ratio were 0.51 ± 0.04 and 0.57 ± 0.05 (P < 0.001); CLA were 91.02° ± 5.67° and 93.55° ± 4.64° (P > 0.05), preoperative and postoperative, respectively. In group 2, SCHNOS-O score were 16.76 ± 13.44 and 15.44 ± 9.26 (P > 0.05); SCHNOS-C score were 61.87 ± 44.14 and 19.16 ± 29.37 (P < 0.001); projection ratio were 0.50 ± 0.05 and 0.58 ± 0.03 (P < 0.001); CLA were 92.32° ± 6.39° and 94.86° ± 5.96°(P > 0.05), preoperative and postoperative, respectively. In group 3, SCHNOS-O score were 15.25 ± 7.83 and 17.73 ± 11.66 (P > 0.05); SCHNOS-C score were 52.03 ± 33.38 and 17.73 ± 11.66 (P < 0.001); projection ratio were 0.53 ± 0.05 and 0.57 ± 0.02 (P < 0.001); CLA were 91.65° ± 5.75° and 93.21° ± 5.38° (P > 0.05), preoperational and postoperational, respectively. CONCLUSIONS None of these 3 techniques cause or aggravate nasal obstruction, and all of them can achieve high cosmetic satisfaction. Technique 1 and technique 2 are suitable for the patients with moderate and moderate to severe short nose that is common in East Asia, which can better increase the protrusion of the tip and length of the nose. Technique 3 is suitable for the patients with better shape of the nose, who need to slightly increase the protrusion of the nasal tip and increase the upward rotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ce Zhang
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|