When did gastro-esophageal reflux become a disease? A historical perspective on GER(D) nomenclature

Relationship between endoscopic gastroesophageal valve grading and mean nocturnal baseline impedance and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between endoscopic gastroesophageal valve grading and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A total of 120 patients diagnosed with GERD disease were included in the study. According to the classification of endoscopic gastroesophageal valves, the patients were divided into 5 groups, group 1 as baseline group, and Group 2-4 as Hill grade I-IV. Basic information about the patients was collected, including age and gender. The mean nocturnal baseline impedance and creep wave index induced by swallowing after rumination were measured by high resolution creep measurement technique. Through statistical analysis, the relationship between valve classification and observation index was discussed. In terms of MNBI, impedance values gradually decreased with increasing valve classification. The average impedance of the Grade 1 group was 23.5 mm Hg/cm2, while the average impedance of the Grade 5 group was 15.2 mm Hg/cm2. This reduction showed a significant decreasing trend (P < .001). In addition, in terms of the peristaltic wave index caused by swallowing after regurgitation, the peristaltic wave index gradually increased with the increase of valve classification. The mean index in the Grade 1 group was 1.8 beats/min, while the mean index in the Grade 5 group was 3.6 beats/min. This increase showed a significant positive relationship (P < .001). Endoscopic gastroesophageal valve grading was significantly correlated with MNBI and PSPWI in patients with GERD. These observations can serve as useful tools for assessing the severity of GERD and monitoring disease progression.

Updates on Surgical Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition that is on the rise. Obesity is one risk factor that has increased in parallel with the rise of GERD. Typical symptoms include heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, cough, and chest pain. Patients with typical symptoms are empirically treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). If the diagnosis is not clear, further evaluation is performed with endoscopy, pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry. Untreated GERD increases the risk of esophagitis, esophageal stricture, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Treatment begins with lifestyle modification and medical therapy. If these fail, surgical and endoscopic surgical techniques are available, to provide treatment, symptom relief, and reduce long-term PPI use.

Acid Suppression Does Not Improve Laryngomalacia Outcomes but Treatment for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Might Be Protective

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the use of acid suppression and thickened feeds impact laryngomalacia outcomes in infants, including supraglottoplasty risk, time to supraglottoplasty, and hospitalization risk.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare risk and time with supraglottoplasty and frequency and duration of hospitalizations for infants diagnosed with laryngomalacia at Boston Children's Hospital between January 1 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcomes were supraglottoplasty requirement, time to supraglottoplasty, and hospitalization risk. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of supraglottoplasty and hospitalization risk after adjusting for laryngomalacia severity and comorbidities in addition to propensity score adjustment. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to determine the impact of acid suppression use on time to supraglottoplasty.

RESULTS

In total, 236 subjects with mean age 62.6 ± 4 days were included in the analysis; 55% were treated with acid suppression. Subjects treated with acid suppression had a greater risk of supraglottoplasty (hazard ratio 3.36, 95% CI 1.36-8.29, P = .009), shorter time to supraglottoplasty (5.64 ± 0.92 vs 7.98 ± 1.92 months, P = .006), and increased respiratory hospitalization risk (relative risk 1.97, 95% CI 1.01-3.85, 0.047), even after adjustment for covariates. Subjects receiving thickening had fewer respiratory hospitalization nights and longer time to supraglottoplasty (9.3 ± 1.7 vs 4.56 ± 0.73 months, P = .004), even after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Acid suppression use does not reduce the frequency of supraglottoplasty and related hospitalizations compared with untreated subjects. However, patients treated with thickening have decreased hospitalization and longer time to supraglottoplasty, suggesting that thickening of feeds may be a preferred intervention over acid suppression.