MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants

Toward a deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging only workflow for postimplant dosimetry in I-125 seed brachytherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The current standard imaging-technique for creating postplans in seed prostate brachytherapy is computed tomography (CT), that is associated with additional radiation exposure and poor soft tissue contrast. To establish a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only workflow combining improved tissue contrast and high seed detectability, a deep learning-approach for automatic seed segmentation on MRI-scans was developed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients treated with I-125 seed brachytherapy received a postplan-CT and a 1.5 T MRI-scan on nominal day 30 after implantation. For MRI-based seed visualization, DIXON-sequences were acquired and deep learning-based quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM) were generated from 3D-gradient-echo-sequences from 20 patients. Seed segmentations created on CT served as ground truth. For automatic seed segmentation on MRI, a 3D nnU-net model was trained using QSM and DIXON, both solely and combined.

RESULTS

Of the implanted seeds 94.8 ± 2.4% were detected with deep learning automatic segmentation entrained on both QSM and DIXON data. Models trained on the individual sequence data-sets performed worse with detection rates of 87.5 ± 2.6% or 88.6 ± 7.5% for QSM and DIXON respectively. The seed centers identified on CT versus QSM and DIXON were on average 1.8 ± 1.3 mm apart. Postimplant dosimetry for evaluation of positioning inaccuracies revealed only small variations of up to 0.4 ± 4.26 Gy in D90 (dose 90% of the prostate receives) between the standard CT-approach and our MRI-only workflow.

CONCLUSION

The proposed deep learning-based MRI-only workflow provided a promisingly accurate and robust seed localization and thus has the potential to compete with current state-of-the-art CT-based postimplant dosimetry in the future.

Comparison between postoperative TRUS-CT fusion with MRI-CT fusion for postimplant quality assurance in prostate LDR permanent seed brachytherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE Permanent seed Low-Dose-Rate brachytherapy is planned and delivered using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Post-implant evaluation for quality assurance is usually performed using Computed Tomography (CT). Registration of the CT images with MRI reduces subjectivity in contouring by improving prostate edge detection. We hypothesized that a set of TRUS images post procedure may provide the same benefit. MATERIAL/METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing Low-Dose-Rate prostate brachytherapy were recruited. TRUS images were recorded under anesthesia at completion of their implant. In addition, all patients underwent standard post-implant quality assurance including prostate CT and MRI at day 30. These were co-registered, contoured and seeds were identified. Three independent observers contoured and registered the post implant TRUS images to the Day 30 CT using seed matching. Prostate volumes and dosimetric parameters were compared through Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) to evaluate the concordance between MRI and ultrasound (US). RESULTS 26 patients were recruited from 10/17 to 01/18. Mean prostate volume was 34.5 (SD 10.8) cm³ at baseline on planning TRUS images, 37.4 (SD 11.3) cm³ on Day 0 post implant TRUS and 36.7 (SD 11.7) cm³ on Day 30 MRI. D90 was 112.6% (SD 9.3) on CT-MRI and 112.9% (SD 11.1) on CT-US. V100 was 94.6% (SD 3.8) for CT-MRI, 95.1% (SD 4.3) for CT-US. Student t-tests were used to compare groups. No significant differences were noted. CONCLUSION Post implant TRUS may be useful for quality assurance for post-implant dosimetry particularly if access to an MRI is limited.

MRI and dual-energy CT fusion anatomic imaging in Ru-106 ophthalmic brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy with Ru-106 is widely used for the treatment of intraocular tumors, and its efficacy depends on the accuracy of radioactive plaque placement. Ru-106 plaques are MRI incompatible and create severe metal artifacts on conventional CT scans. Dual-energy CT scans (DECT) may be used to suppress such artifacts. This study examines the possibility of creating fusion images from MRI scans (preoperatively) and DECT scans (with the plaque in place) as a tool for confirming the anatomic accuracy of plaque placement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six patients with intraocular lesions (5 with choroidal melanoma and 1 with a retinal vasoproliferative lesion) were included. Fusion images of preoperative MRI scans and DECT scans with the plaque in place were created with the Demo version of the ImFusion suite (ImFusion GmbH, Munchen Germany). Clearance margins between the tumor and plaque edge in axial, transverse, and coronal planes as well as the elevation of the posterior plaque edge from the sclera were recorded and associated with the location of the lesion.

RESULTS

Plaque-tumor clearance margins for transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes were higher for anteriorly located lesions (5.13 mm ± 0.11 [5.0-5.2], 5.10 mm ± 0.26 [4.9-5.4], and 5.33 mm ± 0.45 [4.9-5.8] respectively) than for posteriorly located lesions (4.16 mm ± 1.44 [2.5-5.1], 4.13 mm ± 1.42 [2.5-5.1], and 4.2 mm ± 1.21 [2.8-5.0], respectively). The elevation of the posterior plaque edge from the sclera was 0.33 mm ± 0.28 [0-0.5] and 0.63 mm ± 0.60 [0.7-1.2] for posterior and anterior lesions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fusion images between DECT and MRI scans may be used as a tool to confirm the accuracy of Ru-106 plaque placement in relation with the intraocular tumors in ophthalmic brachytherapy.

Fully Balanced SSFP Without an Endorectal Coil for Postimplant QA of MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS) of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To investigate fully balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) with optimized acquisition protocols for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based postimplant quality assessment of low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy without an endorectal coil (ERC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventeen patients at a major academic cancer center who underwent MRI-assisted radiosurgery (MARS) LDR prostate cancer brachytherapy were imaged with moderate, high, or very high spatial resolution fully bSSFP MRIs without using an ERC. Between 1 and 3 signal averages (NEX) were acquired with acceleration factors (R) between 1 and 2, with the goal of keeping scan times between 4 and 6 minutes. Acquisitions with R >1 were reconstructed with parallel imaging and compressed sensing (PICS) algorithms. Radioactive seeds were identified by 3 medical dosimetrists. Additionally, some of the MRI techniques were implemented and tested at a community hospital; 3 patients underwent MARS LDR prostate brachytherapy and were imaged without an ERC.

RESULTS

Increasing the in-plane spatial resolution mitigated partial volume artifacts and improved overall seed and seed marker visualization at the expense of reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The reduced SNR as a result of imaging at higher spatial resolution and without an ERC was partially compensated for by the multi-NEX acquisitions enabled by PICS. Resultant image quality was superior to the current clinical standard. All 3 dosimetrists achieved near-perfect precision and recall for seed identification in the 17 patients. The 3 postimplant MRIs acquired at the community hospital were sufficient to identify 208 out of 211 seeds implanted without reference to computed tomography (CT).

CONCLUSIONS

Acquiring postimplant prostate brachytherapy MRI without an ERC has several advantages including better patient tolerance, lower costs, higher clinical throughput, and widespread access to precision LDR prostate brachytherapy. This prospective study confirms that the use of an ERC can be circumvented with fully bSSFP and advanced MRI scan techniques in a major academic cancer center and community hospital, potentially enabling postimplant assessment of MARS LDR prostate brachytherapy without CT.

Medical Image Fusion using bi-dimensional empirical mode decomposition (BEMD) and an Efficient Fusion Scheme

Background

Medical image fusion is being widely used for capturing complimentary information from images of different modalities. Combination of useful information presented in medical images is the aim of image fusion techniques, and the fused image will exhibit more information in comparison with source images.

Objective

In the current study, a BEMD-based multi-modal medical image fusion technique is utilized. Moreover, Teager-Kaiser energy operator (TKEO) was applied to lower BIMFs. The results were compared to six routine methods.

Material and Methods

In this study, which is of experimental type, an image fusion technique using bi-dimensional empirical mode decomposition (BEMD), Teager-Kaiser energy operator (TKEO) as a local feature selection and Hierarchical Model And X (HMAX) model is presented. BEMD fusion technique can preserve much functional information. In the process of fusion, we adopt the fusion rule of TKEO for lower bi-dimensional intrinsic mode functions (BIMFs) of two images and HMAX visual cortex model as a fusion rule for higher BIMFs, which are verified to be more appropriate for human vision system. Integrating BEMD and this efficient fusion scheme can retain more spatial and functional features of input images.

Results

We compared our method with IHS, DWT, LWT, PCA, NSCT and SIST methods. The simulation results and fusion performance show that the presented method is effective in terms of mutual information, quality of fused image (QAB/F), standard deviation, peak signal to noise ratio, structural similarity and considerably better results compared to six typical fusion methods.

Conclusion

The statistical analyses revealed that our algorithm significantly improved spatial features and diminished the color distortion compared to other fusion techniques. The proposed approach can be used for routine practice. Fusion of functional and morphological medical images is possible before, during and after treatment of tumors in different organs. Image fusion can enable interventional events and can be further assessed.

Comparison of post-implant dosimetrics between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds and loose seeds by sector analysis at 24 hours and 1 month for localized prostate cancer

Purpose

To compare post-implant dosimetrics between intraoperatively built custom-linked (IBCL) seeds and loose seeds (LS) at 24 hours and 1 month by sector analysis, and to evaluate the effect of IBCL seeds with regard to change in dosimetric parameters, in patients with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Consecutive patients treated for localized prostate cancer who received definitive brachytherapy between March 2013 and October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Prostate V₁₀₀ (PV₁₀₀), prostate D₉₀ (PD₉₀), prostate V₁₅₀ (PV₁₅₀), urethral D₃₀ (UD₃₀), urethral V₁₅₀ (UV₁₅₀), and rectal V₁₀₀ (RV₁₀₀) were assessed.

Results

Thirty-two patients were treated with LS and 32 patients were treated with IBCL seeds. The median follow-up time was 49.9 months in the LS group and 27.1 months in the IBCL group. PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀ at 24 hours and UD₃₀ at 1 month showed significant difference (F-test), and standard deviation (SD) tended to be lower in the IBCL group. Analysis of change in the variables revealed significance for ΔPV₁₀₀ and ΔPD₉₀ (F-test, p = 0.014 and < 0.001, respectively), and ΔPV₁₅₀ and ΔUD₃₀ showed marginal significance (p = 0.084 and 0.097, respectively). PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀ at 24 hours and 1 month were significantly lower in the IBCL group, and there was no significant difference in PV₁₀₀, PD₉₀, and RV₁₀₀ compared with the LS group (t-test). The homogeneity index (HI) was significantly higher in the IBCL group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this retrospective single institutional study, there was a decrease in the SD of the dosimetric parameters in the IBCL group, and it was statistically significant in change in the variables between 24 hours and 1 month (F-test). The use of IBCL seeds significantly decreased PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀, and significantly improved HI, without lowering PD₉₀ or PD₁₀₀.

Prostate brachytherapy intraoperative dosimetry using a combination of radiographic seed localization with a C-arm and deformed ultrasound prostate contours

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility of performing intraoperative dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy by combining transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and fluoroscopy/cone beam CT [CBCT] images and accounting for the effect of prostate deformation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

13 patients underwent TRUS and multiview two-dimensional fluoroscopic imaging partway through the implant, as well as repeat fluoroscopic imaging with the TRUS probe inserted and retracted, and finally three-dimensional CBCT imaging at the end of the implant. The locations of all the implanted seeds were obtained from the fluoroscopy/CBCT images and were registered to prostate contours delineated on the TRUS images based on a common subset of seeds identified on both image sets. Prostate contours were also deformed, using a finite-element model, to take into account the effect of the TRUS probe pressure. Prostate dosimetry parameters were obtained for fluoroscopic and CBCT-dosimetry approaches and compared with the standard-of-care Day-0 postimplant CT dosimetry.

RESULTS

High linear correlation (R² > 0.8) was observed in the measured values of prostate D_90%, V_100%, and V_150%, between the two intraoperative dosimetry approaches. The prostate D_90% and V_100% obtained from intraoperative dosimetry methods were in agreement with the postimplant CT dosimetry. Only the prostate V_150% was on average 4.1% (p-value <0.05) higher in the CBCT-dosimetry approach and 6.7% (p-value <0.05) higher in postimplant CT dosimetry compared with the fluoroscopic dosimetry approach. Deformation of the prostate by the ultrasound probe appeared to have a minimal effect on prostate dosimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have shown that both of the proposed dosimetric evaluation approaches have potential for real-time intraoperative dosimetry.

MRI-assisted radiosurgery: A quality assurance nomogram for palladium-103 and iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

We sought to develop an activity nomogram for magnetic resonance (MR)-planned permanent seed prostate brachytherapy to improve quality assurance through a secondary dosimetric check.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients undergoing MRI-assisted radiosurgery (MARS), whereby MRI is used for preoperative planning and postimplant dosimetry, were reviewed from May 2016 to September 2018. Planned activity (U) was fitted by MR-prostate volume (cc) via simple linear regression. Resulting monotherapy nomograms were compared with institutional nomograms from an ultrasound-planned cohort. Dosimetric coverage and external urinary sphincter (EUS) dose were also assessed for MR-planned patients.

RESULTS

We identified 183 patients treated with MARS: 146 patients received palladium-103 (¹⁰³Pd; 102 monotherapy and 44 boost), and 37 received iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) monotherapy. Median prostate volume was 28 cc (interquartile range: 22-35). Lines of best fit for implant activity were U = 4.344 × (vol) + 54.13 (R²: 95%) for ¹⁰³Pd monotherapy, U = 3.202 (vol) + 39.72 (R²: 96%) for ¹⁰³Pd boost and U = 0.684 (vol) + 13.38 (R²: 96%) for ¹²⁵I monotherapy. Compared with ultrasound, MR-planned nomograms had lower activity per volume (p < 0.05) for both ¹⁰³Pd monotherapy (∼6%) and ¹²⁵I monotherapy (∼11%), given a median size (30 cc) prostate. Across all MARS implants, postimplant dosimetry revealed a median V100% of 94% (interquartile range: 92-96%). Median EUS V125 was <1 cc for all patients, regardless of isotope.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a quality assurance nomogram for MR-planned prostate brachytherapy. When compared with ultrasound-planned, MR-planned monotherapy resulted in a lower activity-to-volume ratio while maintaining dosimetric coverage, likely secondary to EUS-sparing and reduced planning target margins.

Interobserver variability of 3.0-tesla and 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy

This study aimed to compare the interobserver variabilities in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomography (CT) fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry of permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) between 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI. The study included 60 patients. Of these patients, 30 underwent 1.5-T MRI and CT 30 days after seed implantation (1.5-T group), and 30 underwent 3.0-T MRI and CT 30 days after seed implantation (3.0-T group). All patients received PPB alone. Two radiation oncologists performed MRI/CT fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry, and the interobserver variabilities of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters [dose (Gy) received by 90% of the prostate volume (prostate D90)], percentage of the prostate volume receiving at least the full prescribed dose (prostate V100), percentage of the prostate volume receiving at least 150% of the prescribed dose (prostate V150), dose (Gy) received by 5% of the urethral volume (urethral D5) and the urethral volume receiving at least 150% of the prescribed dose (urethral V150)] were retrospectively estimated using the paired Student's t test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Pearson's correlation coefficients of all DVH parameters were higher in the 3.0-T group than in the 1.5-T group (1.5-T vs 3.0-T: prostate D90, 0.65 vs 0.93; prostate V100, 0.62 vs 0.82; prostate V150, 0.97 vs 0.98; urethral D5, 0.92 vs 0.93; and urethral V150, 0.88 vs 0.93). In the paired Student's t test, no significant differences were observed in any of the DVH parameters between the two radiation oncologists in the 3.0-T group (0.068 ≤ P ≤ 0.842); however, significant differences were observed in prostate D90 (P = 0.004), prostate V100 (P = 0.011) and prostate V150 (P = 0.002) between the oncologists in the 1.5-T group. The interobserver variability of DVH parameters in the MRI/CT fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry analysis of brachytherapy was lower with 3.0-T MRI than with 1.5-T MRI.

Deformable registration of x ray and MRI for postimplant dosimetry in low dose rate prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Dosimetric assessment following permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) commonly involves seed localization using CT and prostate delineation using coregistered MRI. However, pelvic CT leads to additional imaging dose and requires significant resources to acquire and process both CT and MRI. In this study, we propose an automatic postimplant dosimetry approach that retains MRI for soft-tissue contouring, but eliminates the need for CT and reduces imaging dose while overcoming the inconsistent appearance of seeds on MRI with three projection x rays acquired using a mobile C-arm.

METHODS

Implanted seeds are reconstructed using x rays by solving a combinatorial optimization problem and deformably registered to MRI. Candidate seeds are located in MR images using local hypointensity identification. X ray-based seeds are registered to these candidate seeds in three steps: (a) rigid registration using a stochastic evolutionary optimizer, (b) affine registration using an iterative closest point optimizer, and (c) deformable registration using a local feature point search and nonrigid coherent point drift. The algorithm was evaluated using 20 PPB patients with x rays acquired immediately postimplant and T2-weighted MR images acquired the next day at 1.5 T with mean 0.8 × 0.8 × 3.0 mm 3 voxel dimensions. Target registration error (TRE) was computed based on the distance from algorithm results to manually identified seed locations using coregistered CT acquired the same day as the MRI. Dosimetric accuracy was determined by comparing prostate D90 determined using the algorithm and the ground truth CT-based seed locations.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation TREs across 20 patients including 1774 seeds were 2.23 ± 0.52 mm (rigid), 1.99 ± 0.49 mm (rigid + affine), and 1.76 ± 0.43 mm (rigid + affine + deformable). The corresponding mean ± standard deviation D90 errors were 5.8 ± 4.8%, 3.4 ± 3.4%, and 2.3 ± 1.9%, respectively. The mean computation time of the registration algorithm was 6.1 s.

CONCLUSION

The registration algorithm accuracy and computation time are sufficient for clinical PPB postimplant dosimetry.

Value of CT-MRI fusion in iodine-125 brachytherapy for high-grade glioma

Purposes

To develop a fast, accurate and robust method of fusing Computed Tomography (CT) with pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and evaluate the impact of using the fused data on the implantation of Iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seeds for brachytherapy of high-grade gliomas (HGG).

Methods

A study was performed on a cohort of 10 consecutive patients with HGG were treated by ¹²⁵I brachytherapy with CT-MRI fusion image guided (CMGB), and 10 patients treated with CT alone guided (CGB). Statistical analysis was performed to compare (1) the planning target volume, (2) the accuracy of location of catheters, (3) the target volume covered by 150% prescribe dose (V150), (4) the target volume covered by 200% prescribe dose (V200), and (5) the conformity index (CI) with or without fused data.

Results

The median planning target volume was 50.1 cm³ in CGB, and 56.25 cm³ in CMGB with significant difference (p = 0.005). The accuracy of catheter insertion was 94.4% with CMGB and 78.9% with CGB. The median V150 and V200 was 45.32% vs 64.24% and 32.81% vs 53.17% in CGB and CMGB, respectively. There was significant difference for CI (83.5% vs. 74.5%, p < 0.05) in the two groups for the post-operative verification.

Conclusions

The proposed MRI-CT fusion method enables a quantitative assessment of impact on HGG brachytherapy. The additional information obtained from the fused images can be utilized for more accurate delineation of lesion boundaries and targeting of catheters. Experimental results show that the fusion algorithm is robust and reliable in clinical practice.

Does intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alter prostate size? Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients undergoing IMRT alone

AIM

To assess the changes in prostate size in patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

BACKGROUND

The effect of size change produced by IMRT is not well known.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 72 patients who received IMRT alone without androgen-deprivation therapy and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination before and after IMRT. The diameter of the entire prostate in the anterior-posterior (P-AP) and left-right (P-LR) directions was measured. The transitional zone diameter in the anterior-posterior (T-AP) and left-right (T-LR) directions was also measured.

RESULTS

The average relative P-AP values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after IMRT compared to the pre-IMRT value were 0.94, 0.90, 0.89, 0.89, and 0.90, respectively; the average relative P-LR values were 0.93, 0.92, 0.91, 0.91, and 0.90, respectively. The average P-AP and P-LR decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months post-IMRT, and remained unchanged thereafter. The average relative T-AP values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after IMRT compared to the pre-IMRT value were 0.93, 0.88, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively; the average relative T-LR values were 0.96, 0.90, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.88, respectively. The average T-AP and T-LR also decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months post-IMRT, and remained unchanged thereafter. At 12 months after IMRT, the average relative T-AP was significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those without recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The average prostate diameter decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months after IMRT; thereafter remained unchanged.

Is intraoperative real-time dosimetry in prostate seed brachytherapy predictive of biochemical outcome?

Purpose

To analyze intraoperative (IO) dosimetry using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), performed before and after prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), and compare it to dosimetry performed 30 days following the LDR-BT implant (Day 30).

Material and methods

A total of 236 patients underwent prostate LDR-BT using ¹²⁵I that was performed with a three-dimensional TRUS-guided interactive inverse preplanning system (preimplant dosimetry). After the implant procedure, the TRUS was repeated in the operating room, and the dosimetry was recalculated (postimplant dosimetry) and compared to dosimetry on Day 30 computed tomography (CT) scans. Area under curve (AUC) statistics was used for models predictive of dosimetric parameters at Day 30.

Results

The median follow-up for patients without BF was 96 months, the 5-year and 8-year biochemical recurrence (BR)-free rate was 96% and 90%, respectively. The postimplant median D₉₀ was 3.8 Gy lower (interquartile range [IQR], 12.4-0.9), and the V₁₀₀ only 1% less (IQR, 2.9-0.2%) than the preimplant dosimetry. When comparing the postimplant and the Day 30 dosimetries, the postimplant median D₉₀ was 9.6 Gy higher (IQR [–] 9.5-30.3 Gy), and the V₁₀₀ was 3.2% greater (0.2-8.9%) than Day 30 postimplant dosimetry. The variables that best predicted the D₉₀ of Day 30 was the postimplant D₉₀ (AUC = 0.62, p = 0.038). None of the analyzed values for IO or Day 30 dosimetry showed any predictive value for BR.

Conclusions

Although improving the IO preimplant and postimplant dosimetry improved dosimetry on Day 30, the BR-free rate was not dependent on any dosimetric parameter. Unpredictable factors such as intraprostatic seed migration and IO factors, prevented the accurate prediction of Day 30 dosimetry.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant magnetic resonance imaging dosimetry using positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging markers

PURPOSE

Permanent prostate brachytherapy dosimetry using computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (CT-MRI) fusion combines the anatomic detail of MRI with seed localization on CT but requires multimodality imaging acquisition and fusion. The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of MRI only postimplant dosimetry to standard CT-MRI fusion-based dosimetry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-three patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy with use of positive contrast MRI markers were included in this study. Dose calculation to the whole prostate, apex, mid-gland, and base was performed via standard CT-MRI fusion and MRI only dosimetry with prostate delineated on the same T2 MRI sequence. The 3-dimensional (3D) distances between seed positions of these two methods were also evaluated. Wilcoxon-matched-pair signed-rank test compared the D90 and V100 of the prostate and its sectors between methods.

RESULTS

The day 0 D90 and V100 for the prostate were 98% versus 94% and 88% versus 86% for CT-MRI fusion and MRI only dosimetry. There were no differences in the D90 or V100 of the whole prostate, mid-gland, or base between dosimetric methods (p > 0.19), but prostate apex D90 was high by 13% with MRI dosimetry (p = 0.034). The average distance between seeds on CT-MRI fusion and MRI alone was 5.5 mm. After additional automated rigid registration of 3D seed positions, the average distance between seeds was 0.3 mm, and the previously observed differences in apex dose between methods was eliminated (p > 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Permanent prostate brachytherapy dosimetry based only on MRI using positive contrast MRI markers is feasible, accurate, and reduces the uncertainties arising from CT-MRI fusion abating the need for postimplant multimodality imaging.

Pulse sequence considerations for simulation and postimplant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work is to present a brief review of MRI physics principles pertinent to prostate brachytherapy, and a summary of our experience in optimizing protocols for prostate brachytherapy applications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We summarized essential MR imaging characteristics and their interplays that need to be considered for prostate brachytherapy applications. These include spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, image contrast, artifacts, geometric distortion, specific absorption rate, and total scan time. We further described the optimization of the protocols for three pulse sequences: three-dimensional (3D) fast-spoiled gradient echo sequence for T1-weighted imaging, 3D fast-spin echo sequence for T2-weighted imaging, and 3D fast imaging in steady-state precession sequence for combined T1 and T2-weighed imaging. The utilization of an endorectal coil was also described.

RESULTS

Using the optimized protocols, we acquired high-quality images of the entire prostate within 3-5 minutes for each sequence. These images display the desired image contrasts and a spatial resolution that is equal to or better than 0.59 mm × 0.73 mm × 1.2 mm. While 3D fast-spoiled gradient echo sequence and 3D fast-spin echo sequence depict radioactive seed markers and anatomic structures separately, 3D fast imaging in steady-state precession sequence demonstrates great promise for imaging both seed markers and prostate anatomy simultaneously in a single acquisition.

CONCLUSIONS

We have optimized current MRI protocols and demonstrated that the anatomic structures and positive contrast radioactive seed markers for prostate post-implant dosimetry can be adequately imaged either separately or simultaneously using different pulse sequences within a total scan time of 3-5 minutes each.

Effect of a urinary catheter on seed position and rectal and bladder doses in CT-based post-implant dosimetry for prostate cancer brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the variability in rectal and bladder dosimetric parameters determined according to post-implant computed tomography (CT) images in patients with or without a urethral catheter.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with prostate cancer who were scheduled to undergo CT after brachytherapy between October 2012 and January 2014 were included. We obtained CT series with and without a urinary catheter in each patient. We compared the rectal and bladder doses in 18 patients on each CT series.

RESULTS

The shifts in the seed positions between with and without a catheter in place were 1.3 ± 0.3 mm (mean ± standard deviation). The radiation doses to the rectum, as determined on the CT series, with a urethral catheter were higher than those on CT without a catheter (p < 0.001). Radiation doses to the bladder with a catheter were significantly lower than those without a catheter (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-implant dosimetry (PID) with no catheter showed significantly lower rectal doses and higher bladder doses than those of PID with a catheter. We recommend the PID procedure for CT images in patients without a catheter. Use of CT with a catheter is limited to identifying urethral position.

A new two-step accurate CT-MRI fusion technique for post-implant prostate cancer

Purpose

To develop an accurate method of fusing computed tomography (CT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for post-implant dosimetry after prostate seed implant brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Prostate cancer patients were scheduled to undergo CT and MRI after brachytherapy. We obtained the three MRI sequences on fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (FST1-WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI), and T2*-weighted imaging (T2*-WI) in each patient. We compared the lengths and widths of 450 seed source images in the 10 study patients on CT, FST1-WI, T2-WI, and T2*-WI. After CT-MRI fusion using source positions by the least-squares method, we decided the center of each seed source and measured the distance of these centers between CT and MRI to estimate the fusion accuracy.

Results

The measured length and width of the seeds were 6.1 ± 0.5 mm (mean ± standard deviation) and 3.2 ± 0.2 mm on CT, 5.9 ± 0.4 mm, and 2.4 ± 0.2 mm on FST1-WI, 5.5 ± 0.5 mm and 1.8 ± 0.2 mm on T2-WI, and 7.8 ± 1.0 mm and 4.1 ± 0.7 mm on T2*-WI, respectively. The measured source location shifts on CT/FST1-WI and CT/T2-WI after image fusion in the 10 study patients were 0.9 ± 0.4 mm and 1.4 ± 0.2 mm, respectively. The shift on CT/FST1-WI was less than on CT/T2-WI (p = 0.005).

Conclusions

For post-implant dosimetry after prostate seed implant brachytherapy, more accurate fusion of CT and T2-WI is achieved if CT and FST1-WI are fused first using the least-squares method and the center position of each source, followed by fusion of the FST1-WI and T2-WI images. This method is more accurate than direct image fusion.

Improved dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy using high resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study

Purpose

To assess detailed dosimetry data for prostate and clinical relevant intra- and peri-prostatic structures including neurovascular bundles (NVB), urethra, and penile bulb (PB) from postbrachytherapy computed tomography (CT) versus high resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (HR-CEMRI).

Material and methods

Eleven postbrachytherapy prostate cancer patients underwent HR-CEMRI and CT imaging. Computed tomography and HR-CEMRI images were randomized and 2 independent expert readers created contours of prostate, intra- and peri-prostatic structures on each CT and HR-CEMRI scan for all 11 patients. Dosimetry data including V₁₀₀, D₉₀, and D₁₀₀ was calculated from these contours.

Results

Mean V₁₀₀ values from CT and HR-CEMRI contours were as follows: prostate (98.5% and 96.2%, p = 0.003), urethra (81.0% and 88.7%, p = 0.027), anterior rectal wall (ARW) (8.9% and 2.8%, p < 0.001), left NVB (77.9% and 51.5%, p = 0.002), right NVB (69.2% and 43.1%, p = 0.001), and PB (0.09% and 11.4%, p = 0.005). Mean D₉₀ (Gy) derived from CT and HR-CEMRI contours were: prostate (167.6 and 150.3, p = 0.012), urethra (81.6 and 109.4, p = 0.041), ARW (2.5 and 0.11, p = 0.003), left NVB (98.2 and 58.6, p = 0.001), right NVB (87.5 and 55.5, p = 0.001), and PB (11.2 and 12.4, p = 0.554).

Conclusions

Findings of this study suggest that HR-CEMRI facilitates accurate and meaningful dosimetric assessment of prostate and clinically relevant structures, which is not possible with CT. Significant differences were seen between CT and HR-CEMRI, with volume overestimation of CT derived contours compared to HR-CEMRI.

An adaptive MR-CT registration method for MRI-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy

Magnetic Resonance images (MRI) have superior soft tissue contrast compared with CT images. Therefore, MRI might be a better imaging modality to differentiate the prostate from surrounding normal organs. Methods to accurately register MRI to simulation CT images are essential, as we transition the use of MRI into the routine clinic setting. In this study, we present a finite element method (FEM) to improve the performance of a commercially available, B-spline-based registration algorithm in the prostate region. Specifically, prostate contours were delineated independently on ten MRI and CT images using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Each pair of MRI and CT images was registered with the B-spline-based algorithm implemented in the VelocityAI system. A bounding box that contains the prostate volume in the CT image was selected and partitioned into a tetrahedral mesh. An adaptive finite element method was then developed to adjust the displacement vector fields (DVFs) of the B-spline-based registrations within the box. The B-spline and FEM-based registrations were evaluated based on the variations of prostate volume and tumor centroid, the unbalanced energy of the generated DVFs, and the clarity of the reconstructed anatomical structures. The results showed that the volumes of the prostate contours warped with the B-spline-based DVFs changed 10.2% on average, relative to the volumes of the prostate contours on the original MR images. This discrepancy was reduced to 1.5% for the FEM-based DVFs. The average unbalanced energy was 2.65 and 0.38 mJ cm(-3), and the prostate centroid deviation was 0.37 and 0.28 cm, for the B-spline and FEM-based registrations, respectively. Different from the B-spline-warped MR images, the FEM-warped MR images have clear boundaries between prostates and bladders, and their internal prostatic structures are consistent with those of the original MR images. In summary, the developed adaptive FEM method preserves the prostate volume during the transformation between the MR and CT images and improves the accuracy of the B-spline registrations in the prostate region. The approach will be valuable for the development of high-quality MRI-guided radiation therapy.

Magnetic resonance image guided brachytherapy

The application of magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided brachytherapy has demonstrated significant growth during the past 2 decades. Clinical improvements in cervix cancer outcomes have been linked to the application of repeated MRI for identification of residual tumor volumes during radiotherapy. This has changed clinical practice in the direction of individualized dose administration, and resulted in mounting evidence of improved clinical outcome regarding local control, overall survival as well as morbidity. MRI-guided prostate high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapies have improved the accuracy of target and organs-at-risk delineation, and the potential exists for improved dose prescription and reporting for the prostate gland and organs at risk. Furthermore, MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy has significant potential to identify prostate subvolumes and dominant lesions to allow for dose administration reflecting the differential risk of recurrence. MRI-guided brachytherapy involves advanced imaging, target concepts, and dose planning. The key issue for safe dissemination and implementation of high-quality MRI-guided brachytherapy is establishment of qualified multidisciplinary teams and strategies for training and education.

Improved guided image fusion for magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging

Improved guided image fusion for magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging is proposed. Existing guided filtering scheme uses Gaussian filter and two-level weight maps due to which the scheme has limited performance for images having noise. Different modifications in filter (based on linear minimum mean square error estimator) and weight maps (with different levels) are proposed to overcome these limitations. Simulation results based on visual and quantitative analysis show the significance of proposed scheme.

Magnitude and Implications of Interfraction Variations in Organ Doses during High Dose Rate Brachytherapy of Cervix Cancer: A CT Based Planning Study

Background. Quantifying the interfraction dose variations in the organs at risk (OAR) in HDR intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR ICBT). Methods. Rectum and bladder were contoured in 44 patients of cervical carcinoma on CT after each fraction of HDR ICBT (9 Gy/2 fractions). Interfraction dose variations (VAR_act) were calculated. Rigid image registration of consecutive fraction images allowed quantification of the hypothetical variation in dose (VAR_hypo) arising exclusively due to changes in applicator placement and geometry. VAR_hypo was regressed against the VAR_act to find out to what extent the applicator variation could explain the VAR_act in the OAR. The rest of the variation was assumed to be due to organ deformation. Results. The VAR_act in the dose to 2 cc of bladder and rectum were 1.46 and 1.16 Gy, respectively. Increased dose was seen in 16 and 23 patients in the subsequent fraction for bladder and rectum, respectively. Doses to OAR would have exceeded constraints in 16% patients if second fraction was not imaged. VAR_hypo explained 19% and 47% of the VAR_act observed for the bladder and rectum respectively. Conclusions. Significant interfraction variations in OAR doses can occur in HDR ICBT. Organ deformations are mostly responsible for this variation.

MR-CT registration using a Ni-Ti prostate stent in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

In image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer defining the clinical target volume often relies on magnetic resonance (MR). The task of transferring the clinical target volume from MR to standard planning computed tomography (CT) is not trivial due to prostate mobility. In this paper, an automatic local registration approach is proposed based on a newly developed removable Ni-Ti prostate stent.

METHODS

The registration uses the voxel similarity measure mutual information in a two-step approach where the pelvic bones are used to establish an initial registration for the local registration.

RESULTS

In a phantom study, the accuracy was measured to 0.97 mm and visual inspection showed accurate registration of all 30 data sets. The consistency of the registration was examined where translation and rotation displacements yield a rotation error of 0.41° ± 0.45° and a translation error of 1.67 ± 2.24 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the feasibility for an automatic local MR-CT registration using the prostate stent.

MRI-based sector analysis enhances prostate palladium-103 brachytherapy quality assurance in a phase II prospective trial of men with intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Palladium-103 ((103)Pd) may be superior to other isotopes in brachytherapy for localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer because of its relatively short half-life, higher initial dose rate, and greater dose heterogeneity within the target volume; these properties also underscore the need for accurate target delineation and postimplant quality assurance. We assessed the use of prostate sector analysis based on MRI for quality assurance after (103)Pd monotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer underwent (103)Pd monotherapy in a prospective phase II trial at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dosimetric analyses on day 30 after the implant were done using both CT and fused CT/MRI scans. Dosimetric variables were assessed for the entire prostate and for each of three or six sectors. Volumes and dosimetric variables were compared with paired t tests.

RESULTS

Postimplant dosimetric variables for the entire prostate were significantly different on CT vs. CT/MRI (p = 0.019 for V100 and p < 0.01 for D90). Prostate volumes were smaller on the CT/MRI scans (p < 0.00001). The base sector contributed the greatest difference, with doses based on CT/MRI lower than those based on CT (p < 0.01 for V100 and D90). To date, these lower base doses have not affected biochemical outcomes for patients with disease in prostate base biopsy samples.

CONCLUSIONS

CT/MRI is more precise than CT for prostate volume delineation and dosimetric quality assessment and thus provides superior heterogeneity control assessment after (103)Pd monotherapy implants.

Improving prostate brachytherapy quality assurance with MRI-CT fusion-based sector analysis in a phase II prospective trial of men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We combined sector analysis with MRI-CT fusion to comprehensively assess postimplant dosimetry after prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Subjects were 50 men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with (125)I brachytherapy in a prospective phase II clinical trial. On Day 30 after the implantation, dosimetry was evaluated in the prostate base, midgland, and apex regions on fused MRI-CT scans and CT scans. Volumes of each sector receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100) and doses to 90% of each sector (D90) were also calculated on the ultrasonogram used for treatment planning and compared with values derived from CT and fused MRI-CT scans.

RESULTS

Fused MRI-CT scans revealed lower-than-expected doses for the whole prostate (V100=91.3%, D90=152.9Gy) compared with CT scans (98.5% and 183.6Gy, p<0.0001) and lower doses to the prostate base (V100=79%, D90=130Gy) vs. CT (96% and 170Gy, p<0.0001). However, lower doses to the prostate base did not adversely affect biochemical outcomes in men with biopsy-proven disease at the base. At a median followup time of 42 months, the mean prostate-specific antigen level for all patients was 0.3ng/mL, and no patient had experienced biochemical or clinical progression or recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-CT fusion-based sector analysis was feasible and revealed significantly lower doses to the prostate base than doses estimated from CT alone, although this did not affect biochemical outcomes. MRI-CT fusion-based sector analysis may be useful for developing MRI-based dosimetric markers to predict disease outcomes and treatment-related morbidity.

CT- and MRI-based seed localization in postimplant evaluation after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the uncertainties in CT- and MRI-based seed reconstruction in postimplant evaluation after prostate seed brachytherapy in terms of interobserver variability and quantify the impact of seed detection variability on a selection of dosimetric parameters for three postplan techniques: (1) CT, (2) MRI-T1 weighted fused with MRI-T2 weighted, and (3) CT fused with MRI-T2 weighted.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seven physicists reconstructed the seed positions on postimplant CT and MRI-T1 images of three patients. For each patient and imaging modality, the interobserver variability was calculated with respect to a reference seed set. The effect of this variability on dosimetry was calculated for CT and CT + MRI-T2 (CT-based seed reconstruction), as well as for MRI-T1 + MRI-T2 (MRI-T1-based seed reconstruction), using fixed CT and MRI-T2 prostate contours.

RESULTS

Averaged over three patients, the interobserver variability in CT-based seed reconstruction was 1.1 mm (1 SDref, i.e., standard deviation with respect to the reference value). The D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the target) variability was 1.5% and 1.3% (1 SDref) for CT and CT + MRI-T2, respectively. The mean interobserver variability in MRI-based seed reconstruction was 3.0 mm (1 SDref), and the impact of this variability on D90 was 6.6% for MRI-T1 + MRI-T2.

CONCLUSIONS

Seed reconstruction on MRI-T1-weighted images was less accurate than on CT. This difference in uncertainties should be weighted against uncertainties due to contouring and image fusion when comparing the overall reliability of postplan techniques.

Prostate post-implant dosimetry: interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion

AIM

Reliable post-implant evaluation of prostate seed implants requires optimal seed identification and accurate delineation of anatomical structures. In this study the GEC-ESTRO groups BRAPHYQS and PROBATE investigated the interobserver variability in post-implant prostate contouring, seed reconstruction and image fusion and its impact on the dose-volume parameters.

MATERIALS

Post-implant T2-TSE, T1-GE and CT images were acquired for three patients, in order to evaluate four post-plan techniques: (a) CT, (b) T1+T2, (c) CT+T2, (d) CT+T1(int)+T2. Three interobserver studies were set up. (1) Contouring: the CTV-prostate was delineated on CT and T2 by eight physicians. Additionally one reference contour was defined on both image modalities for each patient. (2) Seed reconstruction: seven physicists localised the seeds on T1 and CT, manually and with CT seed finder tools. A reference seed geometry was defined on CT and T1. (3) Fusion: six physicists registered the image sets for technique (b)-(d), using seeds (if visible) and anatomical landmarks. A reference fusion was determined for each combined technique.

RESULTS

(1) The SD(ref) for contouring (1 SD with respect to the reference volume) was largest for CT (23%), but also surprisingly large for MRI (17%). This resulted in large SD(ref) values for D90 for all techniques (17-23%). The surprisingly large SD(ref) for MRI was partly due to variations in interpretation of what to include in the prostate contour. (2) The SD(ref) in D90 for seed reconstruction was small (2%) for all techniques, except for T1+T2 (7%). (3) The SD(ref) in D90 due to image fusion was quite large, especially for direct fusion of CT+T2 (16%) where clearly corresponding landmarks were missing (seeds hardly visible on T2). In general, we observed large differences in D90 depending on the technique used.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosimetric parameters for prostate post-implant evaluation showed large technique-dependent interobserver variabilities. Contouring and image fusion are the 'weak links' in the procedure. Guidelines and training in contouring together with incorporation of automated fusion software need to be implemented.

Comparison of prostate volume, shape, and contouring variability determined from preimplant magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images

PURPOSE

To compare preimplant prostate contours and contouring variability between magnetic resonance (MR) and transrectal ultrasound images.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-three patients were imaged using ultrasound (US) and MR before permanent brachytherapy treatment. Images were anonymized, randomized, and duplicated, and the prostate was independently delineated by five radiation oncologists. Contours were compared in terms of volume, dimensions, posterior rectal indentation, and observer variability. The Jaccard index quantified spatial overlap between contours from duplicated images.

RESULTS

The mean US/MR volume ratio was 0.99±0.08 (p=0.5). The width, height, and length ratios for the prostate were 0.98±0.06 (p=0.09), 0.99±0.08 (p=0.4), and 1.05±0.14 (p=0.1). Rectal indentation was larger on US by 0.18mL (p=0.01) and correlated with prostate volume (p<0.01). MR and US interobserver variability in volume were similar at 3.5±1.7 and 3.3±1.9mL (p=0.6). Intraobserver variability was smaller on US at 1.4±1.1mL compared with MR at 2.4±2.2mL (p=0.01). Local intraobserver variability was lower on US at the midgland slice (p<0.01) but lower on MR at the base (p<0.01) and apex (p<0.01) slices.

CONCLUSIONS

US is comparable to MR for preimplant prostate delineation, with no significant difference in volume and dimensions. Rectal indentation because of the transrectal ultrasound probe was measurable, although the effects were small. Intraobserver variability was lower on US for the prostate volume but was lower on MR locally at the base and apex. However, the difference was not observed for the interobserver variability, which was similar between MR and US.

Usefulness of CT-MRI fusion in radiotherapy planning for localized prostate cancer

We compared the prostate volumes and rectal doses calculated by CT and CT-MRI fusion, and verified the usefulness of CT-MRI fusion in three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy planning for localized prostate cancer. Three observers contoured the prostate and rectum of 13 patients with CT and CT-MRI fusion. Prostate delineations were classified into three sub-parts, and the volumes and distances to the rectum (PR distance) were calculated. 3D radiotherapy plans were generated. A dose-volume histogram (DVH) was constructed for the rectum. The intermodality and interobserver variations were assessed. CT-MRI fusion yielded a significantly lower prostate volume by 31%. In the sub-part analysis, the greatest difference was seen for the apical side. The PR distance was significantly extended by 3.5-mm, and the greatest difference was seen for the basal side. The irradiated rectal volume was reduced in the CT-MRI fusion-based plan. The reduction rates were greater in the relatively high-dose regions. The decrease of the prostate volume and length alteration of the distance between the prostate and rectum were correlated with the decrease of the irradiated rectal volume. The prostate volume delineated by CT-MRI fusion was negatively correlated with the decrease of the irradiated rectal volume. CT showed a tendency towards overestimation of the prostate volume and underestimation of the PR distance as compared to CT-MRI fusion. The rectal dose was significantly reduced in CT-MRI fusion-based plan. Using CT-MRI fusion, especially in cases with a small prostate, the irradiated rectal volume can be reduced, with consequent reduction in rectal complications.

T2*-weighted image/T2-weighted image fusion in postimplant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy

Computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion is considered to be the best method for postimplant dosimetry of permanent prostate brachytherapy; however, it is inconvenient and costly. In T2*-weighted image (T2*-WI), seeds can be easily detected without the use of an intravenous contrast material. We present a novel method for postimplant dosimetry using T2*-WI/T2-weighted image (T2-WI) fusion. We compared the outcomes of T2*-WI/T2-WI fusion-based and CT/T2-WI fusion-based postimplant dosimetry. Between April 2008 and July 2009, 50 consecutive prostate cancer patients underwent brachytherapy. All the patients were treated with 144 Gy of brachytherapy alone. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters (prostate D90, prostate V100, prostate V150, urethral D10, and rectal D2cc) were prospectively compared between T2*-WI/T2-WI fusion-based and CT/T2-WI fusion-based dosimetry. All the DVH parameters estimated by T2*-WI/T2-WI fusion-based dosimetry strongly correlated to those estimated by CT/T2-WI fusion-based dosimetry (0.77 ≤ R ≤ 0.91). No significant difference was observed in these parameters between the two methods, except for prostate V150 (p = 0.04). These results show that T2*-WI/T2-WI fusion-based dosimetry is comparable or superior to MRI-based dosimetry as previously reported, because no intravenous contrast material is required. For some patients, rather large differences were observed in the value between the 2 methods. We thought these large differences were a result of seed miscounts in T2*-WI and shifts in fusion. Improving the image quality of T2*-WI and the image acquisition speed of T2*-WI and T2-WI may decrease seed miscounts and fusion shifts. Therefore, in the future, T2*-WI/T2-WI fusion may be more useful for postimplant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.

Image fusion techniques in permanent seed implantation

Over the last twenty years major software and hardware developments in brachytherapy treatment planning, intraoperative navigation and dose delivery have been made. Image-guided brachytherapy has emerged as the ultimate conformal radiation therapy, allowing precise dose deposition on small volumes under direct image visualization. In this process imaging plays a central role and novel imaging techniques are being developed (PET, MRI-MRS and power Doppler US imaging are among them), creating a new paradigm (dose-guided brachytherapy), where imaging is used to map the exact coordinates of the tumour cells, and to guide applicator insertion to the correct position. Each of these modalities has limitations providing all of the physical and geometric information required for the brachytherapy workflow. Therefore, image fusion can be used as a solution in order to take full advantage of the information from each modality in treatment planning, intraoperative navigation, dose delivery, verification and follow-up of interstitial irradiation. Image fusion, understood as the visualization of any morphological volume (i.e. US, CT, MRI) together with an additional second morphological volume (i.e. CT, MRI) or functional dataset (functional MRI, SPECT, PET), is a well known method for treatment planning, verification and follow-up of interstitial irradiation. The term image fusion is used when multiple patient image datasets are registered and overlaid or merged to provide additional information. Fused images may be created from multiple images from the same imaging modality taken at different moments (multi-temporal approach), or by combining information from multiple modalities. Quality means that the fused images should provide additional information to the brachytherapy process (diagnosis and staging, treatment planning, intraoperative imaging, treatment delivery and follow-up) that cannot be obtained in other ways. In this review I will focus on the role of image fusion for permanent seed implantation.