1
|
Belkacemi Y, Debbi K, Loganadane G, Ghith S, Hadhri A, Hassani W, Cherif MA, Coraggio G, To NH, Colson-Durand L, Grellier N. [Adjuvant and neoadjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer: A literaure review and update on the state of the evidence in 2020]. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:482-492. [PMID: 32839105 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy has benefited from many developments over the past 20 years. These developments are mainly linked to the technology, imaging and informatics evolutions which allow better targets definitions, ensure better organs-at-risk sparing and excellent reproducibility of treatments, with a perfect control of patient positioning. In breast cancer radiotherapy, the evolution was marked by the possibility of reducing the duration of treatments from 6-7 to 3-4 weeks by using hypofractionated regimens, or by further reducing the irradiation to one week when treatment is solely focalised to the tumour bed. This concept of accelerated partial breast irradiation has challenged the paradigm of the obligation to irradiate the whole breast after conservative surgery in all patients. In addition, the technical mastery of accelerated partial breast irradiation and the development of stereotactic radiotherapy techniques are currently contributing to the development of research projects in neoadjuvant settings. Thus, numerous ongoing studies are evaluating the impact of high-dose preoperative tumour irradiation, alone or in combination with systemic treatments, on biological tumor changes, on anti-tumour immunity, and on the pathologic complete response, which is considered as predictive of better long-term survival in some molecular breast cancer subtypes. In this review, we discuss all these developments which allow breast radiation therapy to enter the era of personalisation of treatments in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Belkacemi
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Centre sein Henri-Mondor, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955 equipe 21, IMRB, 94010 Créteil, France.
| | - K Debbi
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - G Loganadane
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955 equipe 21, IMRB, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - S Ghith
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Centre sein Henri-Mondor, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - A Hadhri
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - W Hassani
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - M A Cherif
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - G Coraggio
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - N H To
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955 equipe 21, IMRB, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - L Colson-Durand
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - N Grellier
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Centre sein Henri-Mondor, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Comparison of postoperative CT- and preoperative MRI-based breast tumor bed contours in prone position for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:345-355. [PMID: 32740818 PMCID: PMC7755637 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07085-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To compare the target volume of tumor bed defined by postoperative computed tomography (post-CT) in prone position registered with or without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pre-MRI). Methods A total of 22 patients were included with early-stage breast invasive ductal cancer, who have undergone breast-conservative surgery and received the pre-MRI and post-CT in prone position. The MRI sequences (T1W, T2W, T2W-SPAIR, DWI, dyn-eTHRIVE, sdyn-eTHRIVE) were delineated and manually registered to CT, respectively. The clinical target volumes (CTVs) and planning target volumes (PTVs) were contoured on CT and different MRI sequences, respectively. Differences were measured in terms of consistence index (CI), dice coefficient (DC), geographical miss index (GMI), and normal tissue index (NTI). Results The differences of delineation volumes among CT and MRIs were significant, both in the CTVs (p = 0.035) and PTVs (p < 0.001). The values of CI and DC for sdyn-eTHRIVE registration to CT were the largest among all MRI sequences, but GMI and NTI were the smallest. No obvious linear correlation (p > 0.05) between the CI derived from the registration of CT and sdyn-eTHRIVE of CTV with the breast volume, the cavity visualization score (CVS) of CT, time interval from surgery to CT simulation, the maximum diameter of the intraoperative mass, and the number of titanium clips, respectively. Conclusions The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT. The pre-MRI, especially the sdyn-eTHRIVE, could be used to optimize the post-CT-based target delineation of breast cancer. Key Points • Registered pre-MRI to post-CT in order to improve the accuracy of target volume delineation of breast cancer. • The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT. • The sdyn-eTHRIVE of pre-MRIs may be a better choice to improve the delineation of CT-based CTV and PTV. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07085-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
3
|
Predicting adherence of dose-volume constraints for personalized partial-breast irradiation technique. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:163-170. [PMID: 32741559 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) and external-beam (EB) radiotherapy are established partial-breast irradiation (PBI) techniques. Although EB-PBI is widely available, it requires extra irradiated margins for target uncertainties. We examined the impact of EB-PBI on dose-volume constraints as compared to MIB-PBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS Among 653 patients receiving MIB-PBI between October 2008 and April 2020, consequent 159 patients after September 2018 were examined. Clinical target volume (CTV) included the lumpectomy cavity plus 1.0 cm. Planning target volume (PTV) for EB-PBI was defined as CTV with 1.0-cm expansion. Because the ratio of PTV to breast volume (RPB) was related to cosmesis, <25% of RPB was defined as suitable for the ipsilateral breast constraints. Preoperative breast size was classified as very small (<350 cm3), small (350-699 cm3), and medium or large (≥700 cm3). According to each category, the dose-volume constraints of the organs at risk were compared between the two PBI techniques. RESULTS Patients including 84 very small, 59 small, and 16 moderate to large breasts were examined. Although RPB was suitable in all patients receiving MIB-PBI, it was achieved in 74 patients (46.5%) receiving EB-PBI (p < 0.0001). The suitable RPB in patients with very small, small, and moderate to large breast was 32.1%, 55.9%, and 100%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Normal-tissue constraints for the other organs could be satisfied in patients with moderate to large breasts. CONCLUSION Although EB-PBI may be an appropriate option for patients with moderate to large breasts, MIB-PBI could still be a crucial technique, especially for patients with small breasts.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chand-Fouché ME, Lam Cham Kee D, Gautier M, Hannoun-Levi JM. Technique d’irradiation partielle du sein : radiothérapie externe et curiethérapie. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:587-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Revised: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
5
|
Ruschin M, Davidson SRH, Phounsy W, Yoo TS, Chin L, Pignol JP, Ravi A, McCann C. Technical Note: Multipurpose CT, ultrasound, and MRI breast phantom for use in radiotherapy and minimally invasive interventions. Med Phys 2016; 43:2508. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4947124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
|
6
|
Hughes KS. DCIS does not need treatment… really? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 154:1-4. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3606-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
7
|
Hansen TM, Bartlett GK, Mannina EM, Srivastava SP, Cox JA, Das IJ. Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Techniques: Brachytherapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Proton Beam in Partial Breast Irradiation. Int J Part Ther 2015. [DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-15-00006.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
8
|
Trifiletti DM, Jones R, Showalter SL, Libby BB, Brenin DR, Schroen A, Morris MM, Reardon KA, Showalter TN. Techniques for intraoperative radiation therapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. Future Oncol 2015; 11:1047-58. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a method of accelerated partial breast irradiation developed to replace other longer courses of radiotherapy with a single radiation session administered at the time of breast-conserving surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of breast IORT techniques that are currently available, as well to consider potential alternative techniques for breast IORT or ultra-short course breast radiotherapy. Furthermore, we highlight the published outcomes for the IORT treatment approaches including: electron therapy, superficial photon therapy and other techniques. Potential future directions of IORT are explored including novel IORT techniques utilizing intraoperative brachytherapy with in-room imaging and rapid treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ryan Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Bruce B Libby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - David R Brenin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Anneke Schroen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Monica M Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kelli A Reardon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
He Z, Wu S, Zhou J, Li F, Sun J, Lin Q, Lin H, Guan X. Accelerated partial breast irradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy is feasible for chinese breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer 2014; 17:256-64. [PMID: 25320624 PMCID: PMC4197356 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.3.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Accepted: 07/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Several accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques are being investigated in patients with early-stage breast cancer. The present study evaluated the feasibility, early toxicity, initial efficacy, and cosmetic outcomes of accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for Chinese female patients with early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. METHODS A total of 38 patients met the inclusion criteria and an accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (APBI-IMRT) plan was designed for each patient. The prescription dose was 34 Gy in 10 fractions, 3.4 Gy per fraction, twice a day, in intervals of more than 6 hours. RESULTS Of the 38 patients, six patients did not meet the planning criteria. The remaining 32 patients received APBI-IMRT with a mean target volume conformity index of 0.67 and a dose homogeneity index of 1.06. The median follow-up time was 53 months and no local recurrence or distant metastasis was detected. The most common acute toxicities observed within 3 months after radiotherapy were erythema, breast edema, pigmentation, and pain in the irradiated location, among which 43.8%, 12.5%, 31.3%, and 28.1% were grade 1 toxicities, respectively. The most common late toxicities occurring after 3 months until the end of the follow-up period were breast edema, pigmentation, pain in the irradiated location, and subcutaneous fibrosis, among which 6.2%, 28.1%, 21.9%, and 37.5% were grade 1 toxicities, respectively. Thirty-one patients (96.8%) had fine or excellent cosmetic outcomes, and only one patient had a poor cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSION It is feasible for Chinese females to receive APBI-IMRT after breast conserving surgery. The radiotherapeutic toxicity is acceptable, and both the initial efficacy and cosmetic outcomes are good.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyu He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sangang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Juan Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Fengyan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiayan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huanxin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xunxing Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Macdonald SM, Taghian AG. Partial–breast irradiation: towards a replacement for whole–breast irradiation? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 7:123-34. [PMID: 17288524 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.7.2.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Largely thanks to all of the investigators and patients who have participated in randomized breast-conservation trials, many women facing a diagnosis of breast cancer today can conserve their breast with the help of adjuvant radiation therapy. A standard course of radiation consists of 5-7 weeks of daily radiation treatments delivered to the whole breast. The success of this treatment has led investigators to attempt to determine whether the same control can be achieved while decreasing the volume of breast tissue irradiated, thus allowing treatment to be delivered in a shorter period of time. This approach could alleviate time and logistical problems faced by patients during their course of treatment as well as improving overall cost-effectiveness. It can also allow complete avoidance of the adjacent heart and lung tissue in the radiation treatment portal. Partial-breast irradiation (the delivery of radiation to the resection cavity, plus a safety margin) delivered in just hours or days, is currently under investigation. Although relatively new, its use is growing rapidly and many institutional and cooperative group trials are quickly enlisting patients, while physicians are gaining experience in a variety of partial-breast irradiation techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M Macdonald
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
[Partial breast irradiation]. Bull Cancer 2014; 101:52-5. [PMID: 24445657 DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2013.1869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Owing to breast cancer screening, breast cancer is more and more diagnosed at early stage. For those breast cancer women, breast conserving treatment (breast conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation) is commonly used since many years. New radiation modalities have been recently developed in early breast cancers particularly accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Among all techniques of radiotherapy, 3D-conformal APBI and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) are the main modalities of radiotherapy used. The present review states on indications, treatment modalities and updated results of local control and side effects of partial breast irradiation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang X, Zhang X, Li X, Amos RA, Shaitelman SF, Hoffman K, Howell R, Salehpour M, Zhang SX, Sun TL, Smith B, Tereffe W, Perkins GH, Buchholz TA, Strom EA, Woodward WA. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation using intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy: do uncertainties outweigh potential benefits? Br J Radiol 2013; 86:20130176. [PMID: 23728947 PMCID: PMC3755395 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2013] [Revised: 05/22/2013] [Accepted: 05/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Passive scattering proton beam (PSPB) radiotherapy for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) provides superior dosimetry for APBI three-dimensional conformal photon radiotherapy (3DCRT). Here we examine the potential incremental benefit of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) for APBI and compare its dosimetry with PSPB and 3DCRT. METHODS Two theoretical IMPT plans, TANGENT_PAIR and TANGENT_ENFACE, were created for 11 patients previously treated with 3DCRT APBI and were compared with PSPB and 3DCRT plans for the same CT data sets. The impact of range, motion and set-up uncertainties as well as scanned spot mismatching between fields of IMPT plans was evaluated. RESULTS IMPT plans for APBI were significantly better regarding breast skin sparing (p<0.005) and other normal tissue sparing than 3DCRT plans (p<0.01) with comparable target coverage (p=ns). IMPT plans were statistically better than PSPB plans regarding breast skin (p<0.002) and non-target breast (p<0.007) in higher dose regions but worse or comparable in lower dose regions. IMPT plans using TANGENT_ENFACE were superior to that using TANGENT_PAIR in terms of target coverage (p<0.003) and normal tissue sparing (p<0.05) in low-dose regions. IMPT uncertainties were demonstrated for multiple causes. Qualitative comparison of dose-volume histogram confidence intervals for IMPT suggests that numeric gains may be offset by IMPT uncertainties. CONCLUSION Using current clinical dosimetry, PSPB provides excellent dosimetry compared with 3DCRT with fewer uncertainties compared with IMPT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE As currently delivered in the clinic, PSPB planning for APBI provides as good or better dosimetry than IMPT with less uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bourgier C, Aimard L, Bodez V, Bollet MA, Cutuli B, Franck D, Hennequin C, Kirova YM, Azria D. Adjuvant radiotherapy in the management of axillary node negative invasive breast cancer: a qualitative systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012; 86:33-41. [PMID: 23088955 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2012] [Revised: 08/06/2012] [Accepted: 09/25/2012] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To actualize and to detail guidelines used in technical radiotherapy and indications for innovative radiation technologies in early axillary node negative breast cancer (BC). METHODS Dosimetric and treatment planning studies, phase II and III trials, systematic reviews and retrospective studies were all searched (Medline(®) database). Their quality and clinical relevance were also checked against validated checklists. A level of evidence was associated for each result. RESULTS A total of 75 references were included. Adjuvant BC radiotherapy (50Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks followed by a tumor boost of 16Gy/8 fractions) is still the standard of care. Overall treatment time could be shortened for patients who present with low local relapse risk BC by using either hypofractionated whole breast irradiation; or accelerated partial breast irradiation. BC IMRT is not used in current practice. CONCLUSION Our group aimed to provide guidelines for technical and clinical applications of innovative BC radiation technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bourgier C, Dumas I, Marsiglia H, Rossier C, Taright N, Biron B, Auzac G. Irradiation partielle accélérée du cancer du sein : aspect théorique. Cancer Radiother 2012; 16:470-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2012] [Accepted: 05/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
15
|
Bourgier C, Acevedo-Henao C, Dunant A, Rossier C, Levy A, El Nemr M, Dumas I, Delaloge S, Mathieu MC, Garbay JR, Taghian A, Marsiglia H. Higher toxicity with 42 Gy in 10 fractions as a total dose for 3D-conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation: results from a dose escalation phase II trial. Radiat Oncol 2012; 7:141. [PMID: 22913640 PMCID: PMC3502482 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-7-141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Recent recommendations regarding indications of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) have been put forward for selected breast cancer (BC) patients. However, some treatment planning parameters, such as total dose, are not yet well defined. The Institut Gustave Roussy has initiated a dose escalation trial at the 40 Gy/10 fractions/5 days and at a further step of total dose (TD) of 42 Gy/10 fractions/ 5 days. Here, we report early results of the latest step compared with the 40 Gy dose level. Methods and materials From October 2007 to March 2010, a total of 48 pT1N0 BC patients were enrolled within this clinical trial: 17 patients at a TD of 42 Gy/10f/5d and 31 at a TD of 40 Gy/10f/5d. Median follow-up was 19 months (min-max, 12–26). All the patients were treated by APBI using a technique with 2 minitangents and an “enface” electrons delivering 20% of the total dose. Toxicities were systematically assessed at 1; 2; 6 months and then every 6 months. Results Patients’ recruitment of 42 Gy step was ended owing to persistent grade 3 toxicity 6 months after APBI completion (n = 1). Early toxicities were statistically higher after a total dose of 42 Gy regarding grade ≥2 dry (p = 0.01) and moist (p = 0.05) skin desquamation. Breast pain was also statistically higher in the 42 Gy step compared to 40 Gy step (p = 0.02). Other late toxicities (grade ≥2 fibrosis and telangectasia) were not statistically different between 42 Gy and 40 Gy. Conclusions Early toxicities were more severe and higher rates of late toxicities were observed after 42 Gy/10 fractions/5 days when compared to 40 Gy/10 fractions/5 days. This data suggest that 40 Gy/10 fractions/ 5 days could potentially be the maximum tolerance for PBI although longer follow-up is warranted to better assess late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine Bourgier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94 805, Villejuif, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Acevedo-Henao CM, Heymann S, Rossier C, Garbay JR, Arnedos M, Balleyguier C, Ferchiou M, Marsiglia H, Bourgier C. [Conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation: state of the art]. Cancer Radiother 2012; 16:641-9. [PMID: 22727723 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2011] [Revised: 03/09/2012] [Accepted: 03/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Breast conserving treatment (breast conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation) has commonly been used in early breast cancer since many years. New radiation modalities have been recently developed in early breast cancers, particularly accelerated partial breast irradiation. Three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation is the most commonly used modality of radiotherapy. Other techniques are currently being developed, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, arctherapy, and tomotherapy. The present article reviews the indications, treatment modalities and side effects of accelerated partial breast irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-M Acevedo-Henao
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif cedex, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Azoury F, Heymann S, Acevedo C, Spielmann M, Vielh P, Garbay JR, Taghian AG, Marsiglia H, Bourgier C. Phase II trial of 3D-conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation: Lessons learned from patients and physicians’ evaluation. Radiother Oncol 2012; 103:193-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2011] [Revised: 03/09/2012] [Accepted: 03/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
18
|
Palma BA, Sánchez AU, Salguero FJ, Arráns R, Sánchez CM, Zurita AW, Hermida MIR, Leal A. Combined modulated electron and photon beams planned by a Monte-Carlo-based optimization procedure for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57:1191-202. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/5/1191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
19
|
Kumar R, Sharma SC, Kapoor R, Singh R, Bhardawaj A. Dosimetric evaluation of 3Dconformal acceleratedpartial-breast irradiation vs. whole-breast irradiation: A comparative study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2012; 2:52-7. [PMID: 23776810 PMCID: PMC3657992 DOI: 10.4103/2229-516x.96810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Conventional early breast cancer treatment consists of lumpectomy followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) therapy. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) is also an approach to post-lumpectomy radiation for early breast cancer. Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare two different external-beam APBI techniques using three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), with conventional whole-breast irradiation based on the radiation conformity index, dose homogeneity index, and dose to organs at risk. Materials and Methods: WBI treatment plans were compared with two different 3DCRT APBI plans for each of 15 patients (8 with right sided lesions, 7 with left sided lesions). The first APBI plan (APBI 1) used two small coplanar fields conformed to the planning target volume (PTV) using multileaf collimators (MLCs) and wedges, while the other APBI plan (APBI 2) used three non-coplanar fields conformed to the PTV using MLCs and wedges. Results: Both the APBI techniques improved the conformity index significantly over whole-breast tangents while maintaining dose homogeneity and not causing significant increase in dose to organs at risk. Conclusion: Both the 3DCRT APBI techniques are technically feasible and dosimetrically appealing,with better target coverage and relative sparing of normal critical organs
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritesh Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Njeh CF, Saunders MW, Langton CM. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using external beam conformal radiation therapy: A review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012; 81:1-20. [PMID: 21376625 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2010] [Revised: 01/03/2011] [Accepted: 01/25/2011] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
|
21
|
Three-field Electron/Minitangent Photon Technique Offer Dosimetric Advantages to a Multifield, Photon-only Technique for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation if Well Implemented. Am J Clin Oncol 2011; 34:648. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e31820059a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
22
|
Bourgier C, Pichenot C, Verstraet R, El Nemr M, Heymann S, Biron B, Delaloge S, Mathieu MC, Garbay JR, Bourhis J, Taghian AG, Marsiglia H. Early Side Effects of Three-Dimensional Conformal External Beam Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation to a Total Dose of 40 Gy in One Week (A Phase II Trial). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:1228-35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2010] [Revised: 07/09/2010] [Accepted: 07/13/2010] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
23
|
El Nemr M, Heymann S, Verstraet R, Biron B, Azoury F, Marsiglia H, Bourgier C. Mixed modality treatment planning of accelerated partial breast irradiation: to improve complex dosimetry cases. Radiat Oncol 2011; 6:154. [PMID: 22074547 PMCID: PMC3262019 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-6-154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2011] [Accepted: 11/10/2011] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed El Nemr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Prospective Study of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Prone Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:568-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2010] [Revised: 11/19/2010] [Accepted: 11/22/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
25
|
Débats autour du cancer du sein : « contre » la radiothérapie peropératoire. Cancer Radiother 2011; 15:453-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2011.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2011] [Accepted: 05/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
26
|
Interfractional target variations for partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 82:1594-604. [PMID: 21570200 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2010] [Revised: 12/28/2010] [Accepted: 01/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this work, we quantify the interfractional variations in the shape of the clinical target volume (CTV) by analyzing the daily CT data acquired during CT-guided partial breast irradiation (PBI) and compare the effectiveness of various repositioning alignment strategies considered to account for the variations. METHODS AND MATERIALS The daily CT data for 13 breast cancer patients treated with PBI in either prone (10 patients) or supine (3 patients) with daily kV CT guidance using CT on Rails (CTVision, Siemens, Malvern, PA) were analyzed. For approximately 25 points on the surface of the CTV, deformation vectors were calculated by means of deformable image registration and verified by visual inspection. These were used to calculate the distances along surface normals (DSN), which directly related to the required margin expansions for each point. The DSN values were determined for seven alignment methods based on volumetric imaging and also two-dimensional projections (portal imaging). RESULTS The margin expansion necessary to cover 99% of all points for all days was 2.7 mm when utilizing the alignment method based on deformation field data (the best alignment method). The center-of-mass based alignment yielded slightly worse results (a margin of 4.0 mm), and shifts obtained by operator placement (7.9 mm), two-dimensional-based methods (7.0-10.1 mm), and skin marks (13.9 mm) required even larger margin expansions. Target shrinkage was evident for most days by the negative values of DSN. Even with the best alignment, the range of DSN values could be as high as 7 mm, resulting in a large amount of normal tissue irradiation, unless adaptive replanning is employed. CONCLUSION The appropriate alignment method is important to minimize the margin requirement to cover the significant interfractional target deformations observed during PBI. The amount of normal tissue unnecessarily irradiated is still not insignificant, and can be minimized if adaptive radiotherapy is applied.
Collapse
|
27
|
Donovan EM, Ciurlionis L, Fairfoul J, James H, Mayles H, Manktelow S, Raj S, Tsang Y, Tywman N, Yarnold J, Coles C. Planning With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Tomotherapy to Modulate Dose Across Breast to Reflect Recurrence Risk (IMPORT High Trial). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 79:1064-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2008] [Revised: 11/25/2009] [Accepted: 12/14/2009] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
28
|
Abstract
Radiotherapy has undergone significant technological advances during the last 20 years, although their use in breast cancer was relatively limited until recently. The major recent changes in the use of radiotherapy for breast cancer have been the following: the establishment of partial breast irradiation (PBI) as an option for therapy in early stage disease; the revival of hypofractionated therapies for breast only therapy; the clearer definition of the role of post-mastectomy irradiation; and the continuing investigation as to which patients having conservative surgery do not need radiation therapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is still not widely accepted to be medically necessary in breast cancer, but ongoing studies may demonstrate that it will prove to be useful in treating node-positive breast cancer when wide-field nodal targets need to be included in the treatment volume. Image-guided radiotherapy will prove to be necessary for PBI by external beam to keep the irradiated treatment volumes within long-term tolerance. The optimum dose and delivery schedule for PBI is yet to be finalized. Overall, the local control rates for all breast cancer treatment scenarios are generally good, and therefore, the emphasis is now on maintaining local control while reducing toxicities from treatment. The long-term risks of breast cancer radiotherapy on subsequent cancer induction are subject to ongoing studies. Biological enhancement of the effect of radiotherapy could allow dose reduction, with presumed reductions in the toxicity of treatment. In conclusion, breast cancer radiotherapy has much to understand and optimize in the 21st Century.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Étude pilote française de phase II d’irradiation partielle accélérée du sein conformationnelle tridimensionnelle bi-fractionnée hebdomadaire de 40Gy. Cancer Radiother 2010; 14:718-26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2010] [Revised: 04/13/2010] [Accepted: 05/13/2010] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
30
|
Belkacémi Y, Gligorov J, Chauvet MP, Tsoutsou PG, Boussen H, Bourgier C. [Radiotherapy and combined therapy in breast cancer: standards and innovations in the adjuvant setting]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2010; 39:F63-F69. [PMID: 21067872 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Due to the significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer seen in the last decades, increased survival rates and better outcomes of patients are being observed. The role of radiotherapy remains pivotal in the treatment of early breast cancer. In the adjuvant setting, whole breast irradiation remains the standard of care using a relatively well standardized radiation technique. The recent technology advances and 3D conformal radiotherapy allow for better volumes definition resulting to increased organ at risk--sparing and therefore treatment optimization. Sophisticated techniques and emerging options (such as accelerated partial breast irradiation) are not routinely used yet outside of a clinical trial. Moreover, new drugs and targeted therapies have recently been introduced to the clinical practice for treatment individualization according to the specific tumours' prognosis and/or prediction of the drugs' efficacy based on new biological tools. Regarding the synergistic effect of these molecules with ionizing radiation, rigorous prospective evaluation of combined therapy is important to ensure improved long-term benefit/risk ratio. In this review, the significant advances of radiotherapy and combined therapy in the new era of breast cancer management will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Belkacémi
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, CHU Henri-Mondor, AP-HP et faculté de médecine-université de Paris XII, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil cedex, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mancias JD, Taghian AG. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using TARGIT: the pros, cons and the need for long-term results. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2010; 10:1869-75. [PMID: 21110753 DOI: 10.1586/era.10.177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph D Mancias
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Impact of residual and intrafractional errors on strategy of correction for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5:96. [PMID: 20977723 PMCID: PMC2987941 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-5-96] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2010] [Accepted: 10/26/2010] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cone beam CT (CBCT) guided radiation can reduce the systematic and random setup errors as compared to the skin-mark setup. However, the residual and intrafractional (RAIF) errors are still unknown. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the magnitude of RAIF errors and correction action levels needed in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS Ten patients were enrolled in the prospective study of CBCT guided APBI. The postoperative tumor bed was irradiated with 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 days. Two cone-beam CT data sets were obtained with one before and one after the treatment delivery. The CBCT images were registered online to the planning CT images using the automatic algorithm followed by a fine manual adjustment. An action level of 3 mm, meaning that corrections were performed for translations exceeding 3 mm, was implemented in clinical treatments. Based on the acquired data, different correction action levels were simulated, and random RAIF errors, systematic RAIF errors and related margins before and after the treatments were determined for varying correction action levels. RESULTS A total of 75 pairs of CBCT data sets were analyzed. The systematic and random setup errors based on skin-mark setup prior to treatment delivery were 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm in the lateral (LR), 3.1 mm and 2.3 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), and 2.3 mm and 2.0 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) directions. With the 3 mm correction action level, the systematic and random RAIF errors were 2.5 mm and 2.3 mm in the LR direction, 2.3 mm and 2.3 mm in the SI direction, and 2.3 mm and 2.2 mm in the AP direction after treatments delivery. Accordingly, the margins for correction action levels of 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm and no correction were 7.9 mm, 8.0 mm, 8.0 mm, 7.9 mm and 8.0 mm in the LR direction; 6.4 mm, 7.1 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.2 mm and 10.5 mm in the SI direction; 7.6 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.4 mm, 10.1 mm and 12.7 mm in the AP direction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Residual and intrafractional errors can significantly affect the accuracy of image-guided APBI with nonplanar 3DCRT techniques. If a 10-mm CTV-PTV margin is applied, a correction action level of 5 mm or less is necessary so as to maintain the RAIF errors within 10 mm for more than 95% of fractions. Pre-treatment CBCT guidance is not a guarantee for safe delivery of the treatment despite its known benefits of reducing the initial setup errors. A patient position verification and correction during the treatment may be a method for the safe delivery.
Collapse
|
33
|
Njeh CF, Saunders MW, Langton CM. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5:90. [PMID: 20920346 PMCID: PMC2958971 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-5-90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2010] [Accepted: 10/04/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is the procedure of choice for the management of the early stage breast cancer. However, its utilization has not been maximized because of logistics issues associated with the protracted treatment involved with the radiation treatment. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) is an approach that treats only the lumpectomy bed plus a 1-2 cm margin, rather than the whole breast. Hence because of the small volume of irradiation a higher dose can be delivered in a shorter period of time. There has been growing interest for APBI and various approaches have been developed under phase I-III clinical studies; these include multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy, balloon catheter brachytherapy, conformal external beam radiation therapy and intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT). Balloon-based brachytherapy approaches include Mammosite, Axxent electronic brachytherapy and Contura, Hybrid brachytherapy devices include SAVI and ClearPath. This paper reviews the different techniques, identifying the weaknesses and strength of each approach and proposes a direction for future research and development. It is evident that APBI will play a role in the management of a selected group of early breast cancer. However, the relative role of the different techniques is yet to be clearly identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher F Njeh
- Radiation Oncology Department, Texas Oncology Tyler, 910 East Houston Street, Tyler, Texas, USA
| | - Mark W Saunders
- Radiation Oncology Department, Texas Oncology Tyler, 910 East Houston Street, Tyler, Texas, USA
| | - Christian M Langton
- Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lisbona A, Averbeck D, Supiot S, Delpon G, Ali D, Vinas F, Diana C, Murariu C, Lagrange JL. [IMRT combined to IGRT: increase of the irradiated volume. Consequences?]. Cancer Radiother 2010; 14:563-70. [PMID: 20729117 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.07.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2010] [Accepted: 07/13/2010] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) combined or not with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are new and very useful techniques. However, these new techniques are responsible of irradiation at low dose in large volumes. The control of alignment, realignment of the patient and target positioning in external beam radiotherapy are increasingly performed by radiological imaging devices. The management of this medical imaging depends on the practice of each radiotherapy centre. The physical doses due to the IGRT are however quantifiable and traceable. In one hand, these doses appear justified for a better targeting and could be considered negligible in the context of radiotherapy. On the other hand, the potential impact of these low doses should deserve the consideration of professionals. It appears important therefore to report and consider not only doses in target volumes and in "standard" organs at risk, but also the volume of all tissue receiving low doses of radiation. The recent development of IMRT launches the same issue concerning the effects of low doses of radiation. Indeed, IMRT increases the volume of healthy tissue exposed to radiation. At low dose (<100mGy), many parameters have to be considered for health risk estimations: the induction of genes and activation of proteins, bystander effect, radio-adaptation, the specific low-dose radio-hypersensitivity and individual radiation sensitivity. With the exception of the latter, the contribution of these parameters is generally protective in terms of carcinogenesis. An analysis of secondary cancers arising out of field appears to confirm such notion. The risk of secondary tumours is not well known in these conditions of treatment associating IMRT and IGRT. It is therefore recommended that the dose due to imaging during therapeutic irradiation be reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lisbona
- CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wang X, Amos RA, Zhang X, Taddei PJ, Woodward WA, Hoffman KE, Yu TK, Tereffe W, Oh J, Perkins GH, Salehpour M, Zhang SX, Sun TL, Gillin M, Buchholz TA, Strom EA. External-beam accelerated partial breast irradiation using multiple proton beam configurations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 80:1464-72. [PMID: 20708848 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2010] [Revised: 04/02/2010] [Accepted: 04/06/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore multiple proton beam configurations for optimizing dosimetry and minimizing uncertainties for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and to compare the dosimetry of proton with that of photon radiotherapy for treatment of the same clinical volumes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Proton treatment plans were created for 11 sequential patients treated with three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DCRT) photon APBI using passive scattering proton beams (PSPB) and were compared with clinically treated 3DCRT photon plans. Monte Carlo calculations were used to verify the accuracy of the proton dose calculation from the treatment planning system. The impact of range, motion, and setup uncertainty was evaluated with tangential vs. en face beams. RESULTS Compared with 3DCRT photons, the absolute reduction of the mean of V100 (the volume receiving 100% of prescription dose), V90, V75, V50, and V20 for normal breast using protons are 3.4%, 8.6%, 11.8%, 17.9%, and 23.6%, respectively. For breast skin, with the similar V90 as 3DCRT photons, the proton plan significantly reduced V75, V50, V30, and V10. The proton plan also significantly reduced the dose to the lung and heart. Dose distributions from Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated minimal deviation from the treatment planning system. The tangential beam configuration showed significantly less dose fluctuation in the chest wall region but was more vulnerable to respiratory motion than that for the en face beams. Worst-case analysis demonstrated the robustness of designed proton beams with range and patient setup uncertainties. CONCLUSIONS APBI using multiple proton beams spares significantly more normal tissue, including nontarget breast and breast skin, than 3DCRT using photons. It is robust, considering the range and patient setup uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaochun Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas, M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Does a Three-Field Electron/Minitangent Photon Technique Offer Dosimetric Advantages to a Multifield, Photon-Only Technique for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation? Am J Clin Oncol 2010; 33:336-40. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e3181b0c370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
37
|
|
38
|
Dzhugashvili M, Pichenot C, Dunant A, Balleyguier C, Delaloge S, Mathieu MC, Garbay JR, Marsiglia H, Bourgier C. Surgical Clips Assist in the Visualization of the Lumpectomy Cavity in Three-Dimensional Conformal Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76:1320-4. [PMID: 19596169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2009] [Revised: 03/30/2009] [Accepted: 04/03/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Dzhugashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bourgier C, Marsiglia H, Taghian A. A mixed-modality 3d-conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation technique using opposed mini-tangent photon fields and en face electrons to minimize the lung exposure to radiation: in regard to Jain et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75:82-88). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76:956-7; author reply 957. [PMID: 20159367 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2009] [Accepted: 10/17/2009] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
40
|
Dzhugashvili M, Tournay E, Pichenot C, Dunant A, Pessoa E, Khallel A, Gouy S, Uzan C, Garbay JR, Rimareix F, Spielmann M, Vielh P, Marsiglia H, Bourgier C. 3D-conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation treatment planning: the value of surgical clips in the delineation of the lumpectomy cavity. Radiat Oncol 2009; 4:70. [PMID: 20042124 PMCID: PMC2808304 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-4-70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2009] [Accepted: 12/31/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate localisation of the lumpectomy cavity (LC) volume is one of the most critical points in 3D-conformal Partial breast irradiation (3D-APBI) treatment planning because the irradiated volume is restricted to a small breast volume. Here, we studied the role of the placement of surgical clips at the 4 cardinal points of the lumpectomy cavity in target delineation. METHODS Forty CT-based 3D-APBI plans were retrieved on which a total of 4 radiation oncologists, two trainee and two experienced physicians, outlined the lumpectomy cavity. The inter-observer variability of LC contouring was assessed when the CTV was defined as the delineation that encompassed both surgical clips and remodelled breast tissue. RESULTS The conformity index of tumour bed delineation was significantly improved by the placement of surgical clips within the LC (median at 0.65). Furthermore, a better conformity index of LC was observed according to the experience of the physicians (median CI = 0.55 for trainee physicians vs 0.65 for experienced physicians). CONCLUSIONS The placement of surgical clips improved the accuracy of lumpectomy cavity delineation in 3D-APBI. However, a learning curve is needed to improve the conformity index of the lumpectomy cavity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Dzhugashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Elodie Tournay
- Biostatistics, and Epidemiology Unit, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Ariane Dunant
- Biostatistics, and Epidemiology Unit, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Eduardo Pessoa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Adel Khallel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Sébastien Gouy
- Department of Breast Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Catherine Uzan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Rémy Garbay
- Department of Breast Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Françoise Rimareix
- Department of Breast Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Marc Spielmann
- Department of Breast Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Philippe Vielh
- Department of Pathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Hugo Marsiglia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- University of Florence, Italy
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
MRI Guidance for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Prone Position: Imaging Protocol Design and Evaluation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75:285-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2008] [Revised: 01/08/2009] [Accepted: 03/24/2009] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
42
|
Prise en charge adjuvante des cancers invasifs du sein : les techniques de radiothérapie modifient-elles les taux de contrôle local et de survie ? Cancer Radiother 2009; 13:434-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2009.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2009] [Accepted: 01/29/2009] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
43
|
Recht A, Ancukiewicz M, Alm El-Din MA, Lu XQ, Martin C, Berman SM, Hirsch AE, Kachnic LA, Katz A, MacDonald S, Nedea EA, Stevenson MA, Powell SN, Taghian AG. Lung Dose-Volume Parameters and the Risk of Pneumonitis for Patients Treated With Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Using Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:3887-93. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.20.0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There are no data on how complication rates after accelerated partial-breast irradiation delivered by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy are affected by treatment technique. We therefore examined the risk of pneumonitis in relation to lung dose-volume parameters. Patients and Methods Our prospective dose-escalation trial enrolled 198 treated patients from 2003 to 2007. Patients received 32 or 36 Gy in 4-Gy fractions, given twice daily: 29 (14%) were treated with pure photons; 149 (77%) with mixed photons and electrons; and 20 (10%) with protons. Results There were four cases of pneumonitis at 4, 4, 7, and 9 months after treatment. All were in the 36-Gy cohort and were treated with pure photons. The risk of pneumonitis for the two cohorts combined was: 17% (four of 24) for an ipsilateral lung volume (ILV) receiving 20 Gy or higher (ILV, 20 Gy) of 3% or higher (P = .0002 for comparison to ILV 20 Gy < 3%, Fisher's exact test); 20% (four of 20) for an ILV 10 Gy of 10% or higher (P = .0001); and 15% (four of 26) for an ILV 5 Gy of 20% or higher (P = .0002). Conclusion The risk of pneumonitis appeared related to the ILV treated. This volume can be reduced by using mixed photons and electron when possible. We recommend that the ILV 20 Gy should be lower than 3%, the ILV 10 Gy lower than 10%, and the ILV 5 Gy lower than 20% when purely coplanar techniques are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abram Recht
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Marek Ancukiewicz
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Mohamed A. Alm El-Din
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Xing-Qi Lu
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Chrystalla Martin
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Stuart M. Berman
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Ariel E. Hirsch
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Lisa A. Kachnic
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Angela Katz
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Elena A. Nedea
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Mary Ann Stevenson
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Simon N. Powell
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| | - Alphonse G. Taghian
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Medical Center; the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74:987-1001. [PMID: 19545784 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 603] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2009] [Accepted: 02/25/2009] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present guidance for patients and physicians regarding the use of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI), based on current published evidence complemented by expert opinion. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic search of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database yielded 645 candidate original research articles potentially applicable to APBI. Of these, 4 randomized trials and 38 prospective single-arm studies were identified. A Task Force composed of all authors synthesized the published evidence and, through a series of meetings, reached consensus regarding the recommendations contained herein. RESULTS The Task Force proposed three patient groups: (1) a "suitable" group, for whom APBI outside of a clinical trial is acceptable, (2) a "cautionary" group, for whom caution and concern should be applied when considering APBI outside of a clinical trial, and (3) an "unsuitable" group, for whom APBI outside of a clinical trial is not generally considered warranted. Patients who choose treatment with APBI should be informed that whole-breast irradiation (WBI) is an established treatment with a much longer track record that has documented long-term effectiveness and safety. CONCLUSION Accelerated partial-breast irradiation is a new technology that may ultimately demonstrate long-term effectiveness and safety comparable to that of WBI for selected patients with early breast cancer. This consensus statement is intended to provide guidance regarding the use of APBI outside of a clinical trial and to serve as a framework to promote additional clinical investigations into the optimal role of APBI in the treatment of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- David E Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Buehler A, Ng SK, Lyatskaya Y, Stsepankou D, Hesser J, Zygmanski P. Evaluation of clip localization for different kilovoltage imaging modalities as applied to partial breast irradiation setup. Med Phys 2009; 36:821-34. [PMID: 19378743 DOI: 10.1118/1.3075904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical clip localization and image quality were evaluated for different types of kilovoltage cone beam imaging modalities as applied to partial breast irradiation (PBI) setup. These modalities included (i) clinically available radiographs and cone beam CT (CB-CT) and (ii) various alternative modalities based on partial/sparse/truncated CB-CT. An anthropomorphic torso-breast phantom with surgical clips was used for the imaging studies. The torso phantom had artificial lungs, and the attached breast phantom was a mammographic phantom with realistic shape and tissue inhomogeneities. Three types of clips of variable size were used in two orthogonal orientations to assess their in-/cross-plane characteristics for image-guided setup of the torso-breast phantom in supine position. All studies were performed with the Varian on-board imaging (OBI, Varian) system. CT reconstructions were calculated with the standard Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm. First, the radiographs were studied for a wide range of viewing angles to characterize image quality for various types of body anatomy in the foreground/background of the clips. Next, image reconstruction quality was evaluated for partial/sparse/truncated CB-CT. Since these modalities led to reconstructions with strong artifacts due to insufficient input data, a knowledge-based CT reconstruction method was also tested. In this method, the input data to the reconstruction algorithm were modified by combining complementary data sets selected from the treatment and reference projections. Different partial/sparse/truncated CB-CT scan types were studied depending on the total are angle, angular increment between the consequent views (CT projections), orientation of the arc center with respect to the imaged breast and chest wall, and imaging field size. The central angles of the viewing arcs were either tangential or orthogonal to the chest wall. Several offset positions of the phantom with respect to the reference position were studied. The acquired and reconstructed image data sets were analyzed using home-built software focusing on the ability to localize clips in 3D. Streaking and leakage reconstruction artifacts and spatial distortions of breast surface were analyzed as well. Advantages and disadvantages of each kilovoltage CB imaging modality as applied to partial breast setup evaluation based on clips are presented. Because clips were found to be difficult to recognize in radiographs, 3D reconstructions were preferred. Even though it was possible to localize clips with about +/-1 mm accuracy based on reconstructions for short arcs of 40 degrees and incremental angle up to about 5 degrees, identification of clips in such reconstructions is difficult. Reconstructions obtained for arcs of as low as 80 degrees and incremental angle of as high as 3 degrees were suggested for easier clip identification. For more severely undersampled data, iterative CB-CT reconstruction is recommended to decrease the artifacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Buehler
- University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75:1290-6. [PMID: 19395195 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2008] [Revised: 01/12/2009] [Accepted: 01/13/2009] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the incidence and severity of late normal tissue toxicity using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 60 patients were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Treatment planning and delivery were in strict accordance with the technique and specified dose-volume constraints of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0413 protocol. Late toxicity was evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading schema. The cosmetic outcome was scored using the Harvard criteria. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of dosimetric variables with outcome. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 15 months, moderate-to-severe late toxicity developed in 10% of patients. The most pronounced late toxicity was subcutaneous fibrosis: 25% Grade 2-4 and 8.3% Grade 3-4. The modified planning tumor volume/whole breast volume ratio, ratio of the volume of breast tissue receiving 5%, 20%, 50%, and 80% of the prescription dose to the whole breast volume, and maximal dose within the breast correlated with the development of fibrosis (p = .10, p = .03, p = .04, p = .06, p = .09, and p = .046, respectively). The overall cosmetic outcome was good to excellent in 81.7%, fair in 11.7%, and poor in 6.7%. The presence of subcutaneous fibrosis, modified planning tumor volume/whole breast volume ratio, ratio of the volume of breast tissue receiving 5% and 20% of the prescription dose to the whole breast volume, and pathologic specimen volume correlated with the risk of a fair/poor cosmetic outcome (p < .001, p = .02, p = .05, p = .04, p = .01, respectively). CONCLUSION The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique for accelerated partial breast irradiation as specified in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0413 protocol resulted in a remarkably high rate of moderate-to-severe late normal tissue effects, despite the relatively brief follow-up period. The toxic events correlated clearly with several dose-volume parameters.
Collapse
|
48
|
Taghian AG, Bourgier C. Counterpoint: Conformal external beam for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2009; 8:184-188. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2009.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
49
|
Winey B, Zygmanski P, Lyatskaya Y. Evaluation of radiation dose delivered by cone beam CT and tomosynthesis employed for setup of external breast irradiation. Med Phys 2008; 36:164-73. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3036113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
50
|
Kader HA, Truong PT, Pai R, Panades M, Jones S, Ansbacher W, Olivotto IA. When Is CT-Based Postoperative Seroma Most Useful to Plan Partial Breast Radiotherapy? Evaluation of Clinical Factors Affecting Seroma Volume and Clarity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 72:1064-9. [PMID: 18411005 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2008] [Revised: 02/14/2008] [Accepted: 02/15/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|