Treatment results of chemoradiotherapy for clinical stage I (T1N0M0) esophageal carcinoma

Definitive radiotherapy in patients with clinical T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study (KROG 21-10)

PURPOSE

To assess the failure pattern and analyze the treatment scheme of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis in T1N0M0 ESCC patients who underwent definitive RT from 2010 to 2019. Patterns of failure were demonstrated as in-, and out-field locoregional, and distant metastasis. In the analysis, freedom-from locoregional recurrence (FFLRR) and their association with clinicopathologic factors were evaluated. Propensity score matching in cT1b patients was done.

RESULTS

168 patients were included with a median follow-up of 34.0 months, and 26 cT1a, 116 cT1b disease. The rates of 3-year all and locoregional recurrence for cT1a were 30.5% and 24.1% and those for cT1b were 27.1% and 25.9%, respectively. Among 116 cT1b patients, 69 patients received elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and 47 received involved field irradiation (IFI). After propensity score matching, the 3-year FFLRR rate was 84.5%. There was no difference between ENI and IFI in FFLRR (P = 0.831) and OS (P = 0.525). The 3-year FFLRR was 83.8% (95% Confidence interval (CI), 61.8-93.8%) in IFI group and 85.3% (95% CI, 65.1-94.3%) in ENI group. In multivariate analysis, concurrent chemotherapy use was marginally associated with FFLRR (Hazard ratio, 0.16; P = 0.064).

CONCLUSION

cT1a patients who cannot receive endoscopic resection showed similar failure rates as cT1b patients, questioning the staging accuracy and raised the need for thorough treatment like chemoradiotherapy. In cT1b patients, IFI with 50 to 60 Gy and concurrent chemotherapy could be reasonable.

Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Brachytherapy for the Definitive Treatment of Esophageal Carcinoma

This study aims to investigate the effect of dose escalation with brachytherapy (BT) as an addition to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on local control and survival in esophageal cancer. From 2001 to 2020, 183 patients with locally limited or locally advanced esophageal cancer received definitive CRT with or without brachytherapy in a two-center study. External-beam radiotherapy was delivered at 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions, followed by a sequential boost to the primary tumor of 9 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions if indicated. Intraluminal high dose rate (HDR) Ir-192 brachytherapy was performed on 71 patients at 10 Gy in two fractions, with one fraction per week. The combined systemic therapy schedules used included 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil alone. Cisplatin was not administered in patients receiving brachytherapy. The median local progression-free survival was significantly extended in the BT group (18.7 vs. 6.0 months; p < 0.0001), and the median local control was also significantly prolonged (30.5 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.008). Overall survival (OS) significantly increased in the BT group (median OS 22.7 vs. 9.1 months, p < 0.0001). No significant difference in the overall rate of acute toxicities was observed; however, the rate of acute esophagitis was significantly higher in the BT group (94.4% vs. 81.2%). Likewise, the overall rate of late toxicities (43.7% vs. 18.8%) was significantly higher in the BT group, including the rate of esophageal stenosis (22.5% vs. 9.8%). There was no difference in the occurrence of life-threatening or lethal late toxicities (grades 4 and 5). Brachytherapy, after chemoradiation with single-agent 5-FU, represents a safe and effective alternative for dose escalation in the definitive treatment of esophageal cancer.

Novel Photodynamic Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma following Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are frequently selected as treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, salvage treatment remains challenging when endoscopic resection is not indicated for residual or recurrent ESCC following RT or CRT. Recently, owing to the emergence of second-generation photodynamic therapy (PDT) using talaporfin sodium, PDT can be performed with less phototoxicity and therefore has regained popularity in the treatment of ESCC. In this study, the effectiveness and safety of second-generation PDT in patients with residual or recurrent ESCC following RT or CRT were examined. Local complete response (L-CR) rates, procedure-related adverse events, and prognosis were evaluated. In 12 patients with 20 ESCC lesions, the L-CR rates were 95.0%. Perforation, postoperative bleeding, and photosensitivity were not observed. Esophageal stricture following PDT developed in one patient, but this could be addressed using balloon dilation. During a median follow-up period of 12 (range, 3-42) months, the 3-year cause-specific survival rate was 85.7%. Even in patients with a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 3, the 2-year overall survival rates were 100%. In conclusion, PDT was an efficacious and a safe salvage treatment in patients with local residual or recurrent ESCC following RT or CRT.

Combination of photodynamic therapy and endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was developed for residual or recurrent esophageal cancer after radiotherapy. Here, we report a case of successful treatment of highly elevated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that recurred after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) using PDT combined with endoscopic resection (ER). An 86-year-old man was found to have an ESCC in the mid-thoracic esophagus. One year and two months after dCRT, a local recurrence was seen. The recurrent ESCC had a highly elevated component. The ESCC was estimated to have invaded the deep submucosa at the highly elevated component. PDT was selected as a treatment option since no lymph node or distant metastases were found. However, there was concern that the laser would not be able to penetrate deep into the ESCC due to its high elevated component. Therefore, ER was performed to remove the highly elevated component, and PDT was performed later. However, after the ER, the circumference of the recurrent ESCC was found to be approximately half the circumference, and post-PDT stenosis was also a concern due to the wide circumference of the ESCC. Therefore, we limited the area of laser irradiation in one session of PDT. Four sessions of PDT were needed over 13 months, but a local complete response was achieved without adverse events.

The role of brachytherapy in treatment of stage I esophageal cancer: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Despite advancements in the early detection of esophageal cancer, optimal radiotherapy methods for treatment of early disease have not yet been determined. Moreover, the benefit of intraluminal brachytherapy on local control or survival remains controversial. We performed a systematic review to establish the role of brachytherapy as boost therapy in stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and to evaluate associated survival outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic search of three bibliographic databases from January 1950 to January 2019 was conducted. All studies investigating brachytherapy for curative intent were included and palliative treatment was excluded. Primary outcomes included overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included loco-regional control (LRC) and toxicity grades and/or complications. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and evaluated study quality using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation, pooled results were presented through risk ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 12 retrospective studies met inclusion criteria. The overall quality of evidence yielded a Grade 1C rating (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). Of 525 included patients, 325 patients received both external beam radiation (EBRT), and brachytherapy, 132 underwent EBRT only, and 68 received brachytherapy with and/or without chemoradiation. For patient group treated with EBRT and brachytherapy, 5-year mortality, DFS and LRC were: 43% (27-59%), 63% (49-76%) and 72% (63-80%) respectively. Rates of complications reported included 82.1% Grade 1 esophagitis for a combined external beam radiation and brachytherapy cohort, 12.3% ulcerations, and 3.3% fistulae.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy as a combined modality is encouraging, given its relative safety and effectiveness. Further prospective analysis using higher quality evidence is warranted to evaluate oncologic outcomes and survival advantage.

Association between Submucosal Fibrosis and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers after Chemoradiotherapy

Simple Summary

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy have not been established. In this study, we focused on the fibrosis of the submucosa. As a result, we found that endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer can be performed reliably without adverse events, but the procedure takes longer for lesions with strong fibrosis of the submucosa.

Abstract

Endoscopic resection is a treatment of choice for a metachronous early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) appearing after a radical cure of esophageal cancer by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, non-curative resection, and procedural complications including perforation due to radiation-induced submucosal fibrosis, are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the association between submucosal fibrosis and the usefulness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in ESCC after CRT. This study retrospectively analyzed 13 lesions in 11 patients in our institute. Submucosal fibrosis under the lesion (F score) was classified into three levels (F0: none or mild, F1: moderate, and F2: severe) based on endoscopic and histopathologic findings. All lesions were F1 or greater (F1: 8 lesions and F2: 5 lesions). En bloc and R0 resection rates were both 100%. The procedural speed was slower in F2 than in F1 (F1 vs. F2; 15.1 mm²/min vs. 7.1 mm²/min, p = 0.019), without procedure-related adverse events. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 14–117 months) after ESD, 7 of 11 (63.6%) patients were alive without recurrence, and without ESCC-related death. ESCC after CRT reliably and safely resected en bloc by ESD but was more difficult in lesions with strong submucosal fibrosis.

Comparison of Recurrence Patterns and Salvage Treatments After Definitive Radiotherapy for cT1a and cT1bN0M0 Esophageal Cancer

Background

Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for stage I esophageal cancer was reported to result in noninferior overall survival (OS) compared with surgery. However, only a few detailed reports of recurrence patterns and subsequent salvage treatments have been published. This study aimed to compare recurrence patterns and subsequent salvage treatments after definitive RT or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between cT1a and cT1bN0M0 esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

Patients with cT1a or cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received definitive RT or CRT were included. Survival outcomes, recurrence patterns, and salvage treatments were evaluated.

Results

In total, 40 patients with EC receiving RT or CRT were divided into two groups for evaluation: cT1a (20 patients) and cT1b (20 patients) groups. The 3-year OS rates were 83% and 65% (p = 0.06) and the 3-year progression-free survival rates were 68% and 44% (p = 0.15) in the cT1a and cT1b groups, respectively. Among those in the cT1a group, six had local recurrence and two had metachronous recurrence. Seven patients underwent salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection and one patient received argon plasma coagulation treatment. Among those in the cT1b group, six had local recurrence, one had regional recurrence, and one had both. Of these, one underwent salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection, one received photodynamic therapy, three underwent surgery, one received RT, and two received the best supportive care. Compared with the cT1b group, the cT1a group had a higher proportion of patients who underwent endoscopic treatments (p = 0.007). After the endoscopic treatments, no recurrences were observed in both groups.

Conclusions

Regional recurrence and distant metastasis were not observed in the cT1a group. A higher proportion of patients in the cT1a group received salvage endoscopic treatments, and their OS tended to be favorable.

Endoscopic resection as an independent predictive factor of local control in patients with T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

Background

Although chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is one of the curative treatments for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with submucosal invasion, the risk of local recurrence after CRT remains a clinical problem. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the predictive factors for local recurrence after CRT.

Methods

Ninety-one patients with clinical or pathological (c/p) T1bN0M0 thoracic ESCC who underwent CRT from 2004 to 2017 in our institution were analyzed retrospectively. Sixty-three patients were diagnosed with pathological T1b after undergoing initial endoscopic resection (ER) and treated with additional CRT; meanwhile, 28 patients were clinically diagnosed with T1b and underwent definitive CRT. We investigated the predictors of disease–specific survival (DSS) and local recurrence–free survival (LRFS) by performing univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The median observation period was 59.8 months. The 5-year DSS and LRFS rates were 84.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76.1–92.5) and 87.1% (95% CI: 79.1–95.1), respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed no significant predictors associated with DSS. On the contrary, ER (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.48, p = 0.003) and tumor length (HR: 6.78, 95% CI: 1.28–36.05, p = 0.025) were recognized as independent predictive factors for LRFS. During follow-up, recurrence was observed in 18 patients (19.8%). With regard to the patterns of relapse, local recurrence was the most common in 11 patients, and salvage ER was performed in 9 of 11 patients.

Conclusions

ER and tumor length were independent predictive factors for LRFS. Our study suggested that performance of ER prior to CRT improved the local control in patients with c/p T1bN0M0 ESCC. In addition, most of the patients who experienced local recurrence were treated with salvage ER, which contributed to preserving the organs.

Temporal changes and risk factors for esophageal stenosis after salvage radiotherapy in superficial esophageal cancer following non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiotherapy (RT) has recently received increasing attention as an additional treatment for organ preservation after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with superficial esophageal cancer. Esophageal stenosis is an adverse event related to RT after ESD that is not widely studied. The aim of this study was to investigate esophageal stenosis related to salvage RT in superficial esophageal cancer after non-curative ESD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients who received salvage RT after non-curative ESD at a single institution between 2011 and 2018 were included in this study. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, was used to assess esophageal stenosis. Data were compared using Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 48 months (range, 12-95 months). Grade 2 and 3 esophageal stenosis were observed in 17 (34%), and 3 patients (6%), respectively. The frequency of grade 2 or worse esophageal stenosis decreased over time (before RT, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after RT: 16 (32%), 13 (26%), 10 (20%), and 6 (12%) patients, respectively). Only one patient required endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) 1 year after RT. All grade 3 esophageal stenosis improved grade 2 or less by EBD. In univariate analysis, only tumor location was a significant risk factor for grade 3 esophageal stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal stenosis, after salvage RT in patients with esophageal cancer who received non-curative ESD, improved naturally or after EBD; only a few cases required long-term EBD.

ACR-ABS-ASTRO practice parameter for the performance of radionuclide-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

This practice parameter aims to detail the processes, qualifications of personnel, patient selection, equipment, patient and personnel safety, documentation, and quality control and improvement necessary for an HDR brachytherapy program.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

RESULTS

Brachytherapy is a radiotherapeutic modality in which radionuclide or electronic sources are used to deliver a radiation dose at a distance of up to a few centimeters by surface, intracavitary, intraluminal, or interstitial application. Brachytherapy alone or combined with external beam radiotherapy plays an important role in the management and treatment of patients with cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy uses radionuclides, such as iridium-192, at dose rates of ≥12 Gy/hr to a designated target point or volume, and it is an important treatment for a variety of malignant and benign conditions. Its use allows for application of high doses of radiation to defined target volumes with relative sparing of adjacent critical structures.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy requires detailed attention to personnel, equipment, patient and personnel safety, and continuing staff education. Coordination between the radiation oncologist and treatment planning staff and effective quality assurance procedures are important components of successful HDR brachytherapy programs.

Long-term outcomes of an esophagus-preserving chemoradiotherapy strategy for patients with endoscopically unresectable stage I thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

•

Endoscopically unresectable stage I esophageal cancer is usually treated by surgery.

•

Operable stage I esophageal carcinomas were treated with our multimodal approach.

•

Based on interim appraisal, most patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy.

•

Although local recurrences were common, half of them were rescued without surgery.

•

We observed favorable long-term survival and esophagus preservation rates.

Background and purpose

To assess the long-term outcomes of a multimodal approach for maximum esophagus preservation in operable patients with endoscopically unresectable stage I thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Materials and methods

The medical records of patients with stage I thoracic ESCC treated with our protocol between 1992 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Our protocol consisted of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by either additional definitive chemoradiotherapy for good responders (CRT group) or surgery for moderate or poor responders (CRT-S group) after an interim appraisal.

Results

A total of 51 patients were analysed. The median age of the patients was 67 years. The median follow-up period was 124.8 months. After the interim assessment, 49 and 2 cases were assigned to the CRT and CRT-S groups, respectively. In the intent-to-treat analyses, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence for death from esophageal cancer, and that for loss of esophageal function were 78.9%, 53.5%, 10.5%, and 20.4% at 5 years, and 55.2%, 27.8%, 18.2%, and 22.9% at 10 years, respectively. Grade 3 late toxicities occurred with the following incidences: esophageal stenosis in 1 case, esophageal ulcer in 1 case, and pericardial effusion in 2 cases. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were observed.

Conclusion

Long-term survival and esophagus preservation outcomes were favorable, with acceptable toxicities. Our results suggest that CCRT is an alternative treatment for majority of operable patients with endoscopically unresectable stage I thoracic ESCC in combination with salvage therapy.

Esophageal cancer patients' survival after complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is an alternative to surgery for esophageal cancer, with a putatively equivalent outcome. However, disease recurrence after a complete response is common and if follow-up surveillance detects recurrence, salvage treatments for potentially curable disease must follow.

METHODS

We conducted a nation-wide questionnaire survey of institutions in Japan certified by the Japanese Esophageal Society to investigate outcomes of primary thoracic esophageal cancer patients initially treated by chemoradiotherapy with complete response diagnoses. The primary endpoint was overall survival, the secondary endpoint disease recurrence. Outcomes of patients who had undergone salvage treatments were also investigated. Cases were excluded from analysis if endoscopic study, endoscopic biopsy, or computed tomography data were lacking.

RESULTS

At 41 institutes 544 case records were collected; valid data on 392 patients were obtained; 5-year survival was 74.8%, 5-year disease-free survival, 66.8%. Clinical staging before treatment significantly affected both overall and disease-free survival rates, but differences between adjoining stages were unexpectedly small. The primary relapse site was classified as primary site (n = 58), regional lymph nodes (n = 36), or distant disease (n = 34). Salvage treatments with curative intent (surgery, endoscopic treatments, and additional radiation) were performed on 38, 23, and 4 cases; 5-year survival after esophagectomy (n = 22), endoscopic treatment (n = 23), and lymphadenectomy (n = 9) was 47.4%, 70.9%, and 33.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of patients developed recurrent disease, mostly locoregional, after complete response. Complete response patients with originally advanced stage disease had fair clinical outcomes; salvage treatments after locoregional recurrence achieved modest long-term survival.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with additional radiotherapy in the treatment of T1a esophageal squamous cell cancer: randomized controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is effective for treating T1a early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, occasional recurrences are inevitable. This trial was designed to clarify the efficacy of combining ESD with additional radiotherapy in the treatment of T1a ESCC.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and September 2018, patients with early ESCC (T1aN0M0) following ESD were randomly assigned (1:1) to the radiotherapy group or non-radiotherapy group. Patients in the radiotherapy group received a median radiation dose of 59.4 Gy within 2 months after ESD. In the non-radiotherapy group, patients underwent regular follow-up only. Recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

70 patients completed the per-protocol treatment. Three patients in the non-radiotherapy group experienced intraluminal mucosal recurrence compared with none in the radiotherapy group. No local lymph node or distant metastases occurred in either group. The 3-year cumulative recurrence-free survival was 100 % in the radiotherapy group and 85.3 % in the non-radiotherapy group (P = 0.04; hazard ratio 0.08, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01 - 0.86). However, there was no significant difference in RFS between the treatments within the T1a invasion subgroups (P > 0.05). No patient died in either group. Mucosal defects of more than three-quarters of the esophageal circumference were positively correlated with stenosis (P < 0.01; odds ratio 23.26, 95 %CI 4.04 - 133.86). No severe radiation toxicities were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy after ESD might be a safe and effective optional therapeutic strategy to prevent recurrence of T1a ESCC.

Management following endoscopic resection in elderly patients with early-stage upper gastrointestinal neoplasia

With the ongoing increase in the aging population in Japan, the number of elderly patients among the total population with upper gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasia has also been increasing. As elderly patients present unique age-related variations in their physical condition, the therapeutic approach for upper GI neoplasia should be differentiated between elderly and nonelderly patients. According to the existing guidelines, additional treatment is the standard therapy in patients who undergo endoscopic resection (ER) with a possible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) for upper GI neoplasia. However, due to the relatively low rate of LNM, applying additional treatment in all elderly patients may be excessive. Although additional treatment has the advantage of reducing cancer-specific mortality, its disadvantages include deteriorated quality of life, complications, and mortality in surgery. In patients with early gastric cancer, we propose treatment decisions be made using a risk-scoring system for LNM and upon considering the physical condition of the patient after ER with curability C-2. In those with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with a possible risk of LNM after ER, selective chemoradiotherapy may be a less-invasive treatment option, although the present standard treatment is esophagectomy. When considering the treatment decision, achieving a "cure" of the tumor has been regarded as critical. However, as the main cause of mortality in elderly patients with ER for upper GI neoplasia is noncancer-related death, both achieving a "cure" and also a good level of "care" is important in the management of elderly patients.

Effectiveness of salvage radiotherapy for superficial esophageal Cancer after non-curative endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection is widely used as an effective treatment for superficial esophageal cancer. However, the risk of lymph node metastasis increases in cases of muscularis mucosae or deeper invasion, for which additional treatment such as radiotherapy or surgery is required. Accordingly, the current study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of salvage radiotherapy after non-curative endoscopic resection as an organ preservation strategy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 37 esophageal cancer patients who received salvage radiotherapy after non-curative endoscopic resection. The pathological invasion depths were the muscularis mucosae, submucosal layer, and muscularis propria in 14, 22, and one patient, respectively. All patients received external beam radiotherapy. Among them, eight received intraluminal brachytherapy following external beam radiotherapy. Elective nodal irradiation was administered to all patients. Twenty-five patients received concurrent platinum and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 74 months (range: 3-212). The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 64 and 78%, respectively. No local or regional lymph node recurrence was observed. The causes of death included esophageal cancer in one patient, metachronous esophageal cancer in one patient, other malignancies in eight patients, and other causes in six patients. Late cardiac toxicities ≥ grade 3 were observed in six patients, one of whom died of arrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage radiotherapy after non-curative esophageal endoscopic resection is an effective treatment as an organ preservation strategy. Although muscularis mucosae and submucosal cancer have a high risk of lymph node metastasis, our results suggest that elective nodal irradiation contributes to reduced regional node metastases.

The role of definitive chemoradiotherapy versus surgery as initial treatments for potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma

Background

We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and esophagectomy as initial treatments for potentially resectable esophageal cancer.

Methods

To assess both strategies, the combined odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Thirteen studies (N = 2071; dCRT = 869 and surgery = 1202) were included. In all, 90.39% of the patients were diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Results

The 2-year (OR = 1.199, 95% CI 0.922–1.560; P = 0.177) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (OR = 0.947, 95% CI 0.628–1.429; P = 0.796) were not significantly different. No significant differences were identified in the 2-year OS among patients with stage I disease (OR = 1.397, 95% CI 0.740–2.638; P = 0.303) or stage II–III (OR = 0.418, 95% CI 0.022–7.833; P = 0.560). Patients with lymph node metastases tended to have a better 5-year OS when treated with dCRT than with surgery (OR = 0.226, 95% CI 0.044–1.169; P = 0.076); however, the difference between the two methods was not significant. Western patients who received dCRT had poorer prognoses than patients who underwent surgery (OR = 1.522, 95% CI 1.035–2.238; P = 0.033). dCRT and surgery led to similar 5-year progression-free survival rates (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.79–1.42; P = 0.70).

Conclusions

dCRT and surgery are equally effective as initial treatments for potentially resectable esophageal cancer. These results apply primarily to Asian populations as they have an increased incidence of ESCC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-018-1470-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The American College of Radiology and the American Brachytherapy Society practice parameter for the performance of radionuclide-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Brachytherapy is a radiation therapy method in which radionuclide sources are used to deliver a radiation dose at a distance of up to a few centimeters by surface, intracavitary, intraluminal, or interstitial application. This practice parameter refers only to the use of radionuclides for brachytherapy. Brachytherapy alone or combined with external beam therapy plays an important role in the management and treatment of patients with cancer. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy uses radionuclides such as iridium-192 at dose rates of 20 cGy per minute (12 Gy per hour) or more to a designated target point or volume. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is indicated for treating malignant or benign tumors where the treatment volume or targeted points are defined and accessible.

Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

The treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer is controversial. For patients who are candidates for surgical resection, multiple prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the advantages of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. For patients who are medically inoperable, definitive chemoradiation is an alternative approach with survival rates comparable to trimodality therapy. Although trials of dose escalation are ongoing, the standard radiation dose remains 50.4 Gy. Modern radiotherapy techniques such as image-guided radiation therapy with motion management and intensity-modulated radiation therapy are strongly encouraged with a planning objective to maximize conformity to the intended target volume while reducing dose delivered to uninvolved normal tissues.

Clinical outcomes of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2008: the second survey of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG)

BACKGROUND

This second questionnaire-based survey was performed to determine the clinical results of definitive esophageal cancer treatment with radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between 2004 and 2008.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Clinical results of definitive RT for patients were collected from major Japanese institutions. Patients were classified into three groups: (A) stage I, (B) resectable stages II-III, (C) unresectable stages III-IVA. For group A, all patients treated with RT alone or CRT were included. For groups B and C, only those treated with CRT were included.

RESULTS

In total, 990 patients (group A 259, group B 333, group C 398 patients) were included from 11 institutions. In group A, 199 patients (78 %) were treated with CRT, and 60 patients (23 %) received RT alone. In groups B and C, 420 patients (57 %) were treated with full-dose cisplatin/5-FU, and 181 patients (25 %) with low-dose protracted-infusion cisplatin/5-FU. The median and range of the 5-year overall survival rate were 73 % (40-94 %) for group A, 40 % (0-57 %) for group B, and 18 % (6-26 %) for group C, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were consistently good for five high-volume centers where more than 20 patients/year with esophageal cancer were treated definitively as compared with the remaining six medium-volume centers (5-15 patients/year). The median and range of the incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicities were 10 % and 6-22 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide disparity in 5-year overall survival rates among the institutions was still apparent in the second survey for groups A and B.

Nedaplatin concurrent with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of nedaplatin (NDP) concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma were randomized into either a NDP group (n = 34) or a cisplatin (DDP) group (n = 34). The NDP group received NDP 80-100 mg/m²iv on day 1 + leucovorin (CF) 100 mg/m²iv on days 1-5 + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m²iv on days 1-5. The DDP group received DDP 30 mg/m²iv on days 1-3 + CF 100 mg/m² on days 1-5 + 5-FU 500 mg/m²iv on days 1-5. The treatment was repeated every 4 wk in both groups. Concurrent radiotherapy [60-66 Gy/(30-33 f)/(6-7 wk)] was given during chemotherapy.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the short-term response rate between the NDP group and DDP group (90.9% vs 81.3%, P = 0.528). Although the 1- and 2-year survival rates were higher in the NDP group than in the DDP group (75.8% vs 68.8%, 57.6% vs 50.0%), the difference in the overall survival rate was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.540). The incidences of nausea, vomiting and nephrotoxicity were significantly lower in the NDP group than in the DDP group (17.6% vs 50.0%, P = 0.031; 11.8% vs 47.1%, P = 0.016; 8.8% vs 38.2%, P = 0.039). There was no significant difference in the incidence of myelosuppression, radiation-induced esophagitis or radiation-induced pneumonia between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: NDP-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. NDP-based regimen has comparable efficacy to DDP-based regimen but is associated with lower incidences of gastrointestinal and renal toxicity.

Neoadjuvant hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: phase II study

PURPOSE

Concomitant use of chemotherapy and a radiation dose schedule that is more efficient compared to conventional radiotherapy may provide better outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy regimen in this group of patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 20 newly diagnosed treatment-naïve esophageal cancer patients were included in the study. Neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-FU were given with 28-day intervals in a total of three courses. Along with the third course of chemotherapy, hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) was given with the following dose schedule: 5760 cGy/36 fr/16 day.

RESULTS

All patients could receive the planned RT dose of 5760 cGy. Odynophagia was the most frequent grade III acute toxicity (50%). None of the acute toxicity reactions required treatment discontinuation. Grade III or higher subacute/late toxicity occurred in 10 patients (75%) including 5 deaths, mostly esophageal. Radiologically, 8 patients (40%) had complete response, 8 (40%) had partial response, and 3 (15%) had stable disease, with only 1 patient (5%) having progressive disease. Seven patients underwent surgery. Overall, 8 patients (40%) had local control. The 5 years overall survival rate was 38.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy may help to target local disease control and increase survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Further studies to improve neoadjuvant and radical chemoradiotherapy dose schedules are warranted for maximum tumor control rates with minimal toxicity.

Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the best approach? Frame the issue

Surgical resection continues to be the gold standard treatment approach for early invasive and locoregional esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy has historically had a reputation as a complex operation with high mortality and morbidity. Increasingly, results from high-volume specialized centers have demonstrated that mortality rates of below 4% should be expected and that patients can potentially demonstrate excellent levels of quality of life following surgical resection. Up until recently, virtually all surgical resections were done utilizing an open approach utilizing either a transthoracic or a transhiatal operation. Over the past several years, however, a variety of fully minimally invasive or hybrid procedures have been advocated with a view of improving mortality and morbidity outcomes. In the absence of either randomized or controlled prospective comparisons, this series of papers will review current perceptions of the advantages of both minimally invasive and open surgery for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Patterns of failure associated with involved field radiotherapy in patients with clinical stage I thoracic esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the patterns of the first sites of failure in patients with clinical stage I thoracic esophageal cancer after involved field radiotherapy and to determine whether elective nodal irradiation is necessary for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2000 and 2007, 68 patients aged 43-84 years with clinical stage I thoracic esophageal cancer received definitive radiotherapy. The radiation field included the primary tumor with a 3-cm margin in the cranio-caudal direction. Patterns of lymph node failure were classified according to the first sites of failure. In-field, regional and distant lymph node failures were defined as lymph node failures within the irradiated area, within the mediastinum or perigastric area beyond the irradiated area, and outside the regional lymph nodes, respectively.

RESULTS

The 3 year overall and disease-free survival rates were 76 and 66%, respectively (median follow-up: 42 months). Twenty-two of the 68 patients exhibited treatment failure. Local failure with or without recurrence in other sites was observed in 11 patients, lymph node failure in 10 patients, and distant metastasis in 1. Of the 10 patients with lymph node failure, sites of failure were in-field in 1 patient, in-field and distant in 1, regional in 3, distant in 2 and distant and regional in 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Involved field radiotherapy did not result in significant incidence of regional lymph node failure in clinical stage I thoracic esophageal cancer patients. However, further investigation is needed to establish the optimal radiotherapy field for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal cancer.

Clinical practice and outcome of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer between 1999 and 2003: the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG) Survey

BACKGROUND

To determine the clinical results of radiotherapy (RT) for esophageal cancer in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire-based survey was conducted for esophageal cancer treated by definitive RT between 1999 and 2003. Clinical results of definitive RT for patients were collected from 9 major institutions. Only patients with good performance status (PS 0-2) who received a total dose of 50 Gy or more were included. Patients were classified into three groups: (A) stage I, (B) resectable stages II-III, (C) unresectable stages III-IVA. For group A, all patients treated by RT alone or chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) were included. For groups B and C, only those treated by CRT were included.

RESULTS

In total, 167 patients were included in group A, 239 in group B, and 244 in group C. Approximately half of the patients in group A were treated by CRT. The median total RT dose ranged from 60 to 66 Gy. The median and range of the 5-year overall survival rates were 56% (48-83%) for group A, 29% (12-52%) for group B, and 19% (0-31%) for group C, respectively. A wide disparity in overall survival rates was noted among the institutions. A significant correlation between the number of patients treated per year and the 5-year overall survival rate was noted for groups B and C (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although the overall survival rates for stage I esophageal cancer were excellent, a significant disparity in survival rates was noted among the institutions for stage II-IVA tumors treated by CRT.

The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0-IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments that remove lesions while sparing healthy tissue. This review assesses their safety and efficacy/effectiveness relative to traditional, non-endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Bibliographic databases searched to identify relevant English language studies published in the last 3 years included: PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE and additional sources), EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS EED, DARE and HTA) databases, EconLit and Web of Science. Web sites of professional associations, relevant cancer organizations, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical trials were also searched. Two independent reviewers selected, critically appraised, and extracted information from studies.

RESULTS

The review included 75 studies spanning 3124 patients and 10 forms of treatment. Most studies were of short term duration and non-comparative. Adverse events reported across studies of endoscopic techniques were similar and less significant compared to those in the studies of non-endoscopic techniques. Complete response rates were slightly lower for photodynamic therapy (PDT) relative to the other endoscopic techniques, possibly due to differences in patient populations across studies. No studies compared overall or cause-specific survival in patients who received endoscopic treatments vs. those who received non-endoscopic treatments.

DISCUSSION

Based on findings from this review, there is no single "best practice" approach to the treatment of early esophageal cancer.

A single-institutional brachytherapy experience in the management of esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to analyze the efficacy of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2001 and 2008, 104 patients (88 males and 16 females) received a brachytherapy treatment as a part of a personalized multimodal approach. The median age was 72 years, and the median Karnofsky performance status was 60. Brachytherapy was used in different situations: to complete a primary treatment with radical intent in patients not suitable for surgery; to control local recurrences; or to obtain a rapid and durable palliation of dysphagia in patients with metastases or in poor general condition. In selected cases, endoscopic ultrasound images were integrated in treatment planning procedure to obtain a more accurate volume definition. Efficacy in controlling dysphagia was assessed 1 month after brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients received a radical treatment, and 53 patients were treated to relieve the symptoms. The median overall survival was 20.8 months. Lymph node involvement was found to be a significant prognostic factor for overall survival and dysphagia. Dysphagia was controlled in 88 patients (84.6%), and the median dysphagia-free interval was 17.5 months. Early and late adverse events were generally mild to moderate. The most severe effects were esophagotracheal fistulas, observed in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy has an important role in the management of esophageal cancer with a low rate of complications. endoscopic ultrasound-assisted treatment planning can be useful for a better individualization of curative treatments.

A suspected [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-negative metastatic lymph node successfully diagnosed by laparoscopic staging in esophageal cancer: report of two cases

An accurate preoperative staging is important for selecting an appropriate therapy for esophageal cancer. In particular, diagnosis of lymph node metastases influences the indication for radical surgery. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been widely applied primarily as a useful tool for initial staging of esophageal cancer. However, false-negative cases sometimes make it difficult to select the appropriate treatment. We report two patients with esophageal cancer and PET-negative enlarged lymph node successfully diagnosed by laparoscopic sampling. This procedure did not only allow accurate histopathological staging, but also helped to select the optimal minimally invasive management. This technique can be recommended for patients with esophageal cancer in whom the diagnosis of enlarged lymph node cannot be confirmed by preoperative imaging.

Two cases of carcinoma of the cervical esophagus adjacent to the larynx treated with surgery

We report herein two cases of carcinoma of the cervical esophagus adjacent to the larynx in which surgery achieved good results. Surgery for case 1, a 64-year-old woman, comprised resection of a carcinoma of the cervical esophagus at stage 0-IIa T1aN0M0, bilateral neck and paratracheal dissections (D1 and D2 dissection), reconstruction using the free jejunal segment, and tracheostomy. At 30 days postoperatively, she was able to eat normal food. For case 2, a 58-year-old man, the same operative procedures were conducted for stage 0-IIc T1bN0M0 carcinoma. At 33 days postoperatively, the patient was able to eat rice porridge (5 parts water, 1 part rice). We therefore consider that for carcinomas in the vicinity of the pharyngoesophageal segment, surgery can achieve both radical cure and preservation of function in some cases.

Treatment of double carcinoma of the esophagus and lung

We report four cases of double carcinoma of the esophagus and the lung. Case 1: a patient with synchronous double carcinoma of the esophagus and the lung underwent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) because of respiratory dysfunction. Case 2: a patient who was diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma after the surgery for lung carcinoma underwent CRT because of respiratory dysfunction. Case 3: a patient with synchronous double carcinoma underwent a two-stage operation. Case 4: a patient with synchronous double carcinoma underwent CRT at another hospital. To further treat the patients, we chose a two-stage operation. CRT is believed to be a feasible treatment in inoperable patients because patients 1 and 2 are alive 28 and 21 months after CRT, respectively. A two-stage operation is considered a suitably safe surgical procedure because no fatal postoperative complications occurred in cases 3 and 4.

Treatment outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with stage I esophageal cancer: a single institute experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of radiotherapy for patients with stage I esophageal cancer.

METHODS

From 1995 to 2005, 34 patients with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without lymph node metastasis were treated with radiotherapy at our institute. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 68 years; range, 47 to 84 years; male:female, 33:1; performance status, 0/1/2/3 = 23/9/1/1; T1a/T1b = 4/30. Median fraction and total doses of external irradiation given were 2.0 Gy and 60 Gy, respectively. Twenty-three patients had local irradiation to the primary lesion only; the remaining 11 patients received regional field irradiation, including one or 2 regional lymph node areas. Only one patient received adjuvant intracavitary radiotherapy after radiotherapy. Thirty of the patients received concurrent chemotherapy, most of the regimens of which included cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 5 patients. Fifteen patients (44%) had coexisting malignancies. The median follow-up was 38 months (range, 8-107 months).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall, cause-specific, and local-progression-free survival rates were 50.4%, 91.2%, and 81.1%, respectively. Of the 34 patients, 6 had in-field local recurrence, and one had recurrence in the esophagus outside of the irradiated field. Two patients experienced regional lymph node metastasis outside of the irradiated field, and one had distant metastasis. Two patients received salvage surgery, and 4 patients received salvage intracavitary radiotherapy after local recurrence. A late toxicity greater than grade 2 was not observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality for patients with stage I esophageal cancer.

Esophagectomy--it's not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal resection (ER) remains the standard therapy for early esophageal cancer; however, because of concerns regarding high levels of morbidity and mortality reported in analyses of national databases, many patients are relegated to less effective endoscopic or chemotherapeutic approaches.

METHODS

All patients undergoing esophagectomy by a single surgeon for cancer or high-grade dysplasia between 05/91-05/06 were prospectively entered into an IRB-approved database. All aspects of work-up and treatment were guided by an evolving standardized perioperative clinical pathway.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty consecutive patients, mean age of 64 (33-90), underwent ER for Barrett's esophagus (17) or invasive cancer stages I-87, II-133, III-94, IV-9. One hundred thirty-nine (41%) had neoadjuvant therapy. Sixty-three percent were American Society of Anesthesiologists class III or IV, and five different operative approaches were used. Patient were managed intraoperatively with a "fluid restriction" protocol. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 230 cc. 99.5% of patients were extubated immediately, and mean ICU and hospital stays were 2.25 (1-30) and 11.5 (6-49) days, respectively. Postoperative analgesia was managed with patient-controlled epidural analgesia in 98.5%, and 86% were mobilized on day 1 after surgery. Complications occurred in 153 patients (45%), most commonly atrial dysrhythmia (13%), and postoperative delirium (11%). Anastomotic leaks occurred in 13 patients (3.8%). Mortality occurred in one patient (0.3%). No significant differences were seen in length of stay, operative time, blood loss, or complications in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. For stages I, II, and III, patients between 1998-2004 Kaplan-Meier 5-year cumulative survival was 92.4, 57.1, and 34.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer can be done with moderate morbidity and very low mortality, and the expectation of improved levels of survival, especially in early-stage patients. Standardized perioperative clinical pathways can provide the infrastructure for the treatment of these patients and should include increased efforts to minimize blood loss and transfusions, improve postoperative pain control and extubation rates, and facilitate early mobilization and discharge. ER, as sole therapy or in combination with radiation/chemotherapy, should remain the standard of care in patients with early and locoregional esophageal cancer.

Argon Plasma Coagulation for the Treatment of Superficial Esophageal Carcinoma

AIMS

Recently, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has become the first choice of treatment for superficial esophageal cancer without metastasis. However, EMR is not safe for all patients. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is a noncontact electrocoagulation technique that creates tissue damage. The risk of bleeding may be lower with APC than with EMR. Therefore, we selected APC for the treatment of patients with superficial esophageal cancer who could not undergo EMR. The aim of the present study was to describe these cases and analyze the results of this treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients with superficial esophageal cancer underwent APC at our institution from February 2001 through January 2002. None of the patients could undergo EMR because of complications. Ablation was performed using an APC probe (ERBE APC probe; ERBE Elektromedizin, Tübingen, Germany), a high-frequency electrosurgical generator (ERBE ICC200), and an argon delivery unit (ERBE APC 300). All patients had uneventful recoveries.

RESULTS

No incidents of bleeding from the ablated lesion or infection occurred. Oral intake was resumed on the day after treatment. The mean duration of the procedure was 20 minutes (range, 10 to 40 minutes). Disease recurred in two patients. Two patients died of laryngeal cancer and liver failure, respectively.

CONCLUSION

APC is a safe and easy to perform procedure, but the effect of therapy is inferior to that of EMR in terms of the complete resection of the lesion. In conclusion, APC should be limited to cases of superficial esophageal cancer without metastasis in which EMR has been deemed difficult.