Phase I North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial-N9923 of escalating doses of twice-daily thoracic radiation therapy with amifostine and with alternating chemotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer

Amifostine- and chemoradiotherapy-related esophagitis in small cell lung cancer: a single institutional series and literature update

Objectives

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered a standard option for patients with stage 3 small cell lung carcinoma. A 25% risk of acute esophagitis is experienced by patients as a result of the volume of esophagus encompassed within a conformal radiotherapy technique. We reviewed our institutional experience administering the radioprotectant amifostine prior to daily radiotherapy to determine its effects on the onset of esophagitis.

Materials and methods

From 2005 to 2016, 49 patients diagnosed with stage 3 small cell lung carcinoma received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy (CT) consisted of cisplatin and etoposide with radiotherapy (RT) encompassing CT-identified gross tumor volume. In 32 patients (group 1), amifostine was delivered (500 mg subcutaneously divided in two injections) prior to the second daily RT fraction. The remaining 17 patients (group 2) did not receive amifostine due to choice or drug intolerance.

Results

Metrics of esophagitis included weight loss and opiate requirement during treatment. About 31% of group 1 required opiates at a median RT dose of 3300 cGy, and 41% of group 2 required opiates at a median dose of 2250 cGy. The dose of radiotherapy delivered to 50% of the esophageal volume for group 1 was significantly greater than that in group 2 (3000 cGy vs 576 cGy).

Conclusion

In this modern retrospective series of thoracic chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of stage 3 small cell lung cancer, amifostine that was delivered subcutaneously postponed the onset of esophagitis.

The Complementary Nature of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Adverse Event Reporting in Cooperative Group Oncology Clinical Trials: A Pooled Analysis (NCCTG N0591)

CONTEXT

Clinical trials use clinician-graded adverse events (AEs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to describe symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to examine the agreement between PROs and AEs in the clinical trial setting.

METHODS

Patient-level data were pooled from seven North Central Cancer Treatment Group, two Southwest Oncology Group, and three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group lung studies that included both PROs and AE data. Ten-point changes (on a 0-100 scale) in PRO scores were considered clinically significant differences (CSDs). PRO score changes were compared to AE grade (Gr) categories (2+ yes vs. no and 3+ yes vs. no) using Wilcoxon rank-sum or two-sample t-tests between Gr categories. Incidence rates and concordance of CSD in PRO scores and AE Gr categories were compiled. Spearman correlations were computed between PRO scores and AE severity.

RESULTS

PROs completed by patients (n = 1013) were the Uniscale, Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L), Symptom Distress Scale, and/or Functional Living Index-Cancer. Significantly worse PRO score changes were found for the FACT-L in patients with Gr 2+ AEs. Worse scores were seen for the Uniscale for patients with Gr 2+ AEs (P = 0.07) and LCSS for patients with Gr 3+ AEs (P = 0.09). Agreement between incidence of any Gr 2+ (Gr 3+) AE and a CSD in PROs ranged from 27% to 67% (36%-61%). Correlations between PRO scores and AE severity were low: -0.06 Uniscale, -0.03 LCSS, 0.10 FACT-L, -0.11 Symptom Distress Scale, and -0.51 Functional Living Index-Cancer.

CONCLUSION

These results support previous work and an a priori hypothesis that AEs and PROs measure differing aspects of the disease experience and are complementary.

Pulmonary toxicity in a rabbit model of stereotactic lung radiation therapy: efficacy of a radioprotector

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the radioprotector amifostine in limiting radiation toxicity in a rabbit model of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) by correlating contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (ce-MRA), computed tomography (CT), and helium-3 (He-3) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with histopathology. Multiple MRI techniques were tested to obtain complementing physiologic information. Thirteen rabbits received SBRT to the right lower lobe of the lung. Specifically, 4 received 3 × 11 Gray (Gy), 6 received 3 × 11 Gy and 50 mg/kg of amifostine pre-SRBT, and 3 received 3 × 7, 3 × 9, or 3 × 13 Gy. Imaging was performed at baseline and 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks post-SBRT. Ce-MRA perfusion difference between lungs in the irradiated group at 16 weeks post-treatment was statistically significant (P = .04) whereas the difference in the irradiated + amifostine group was not (P = .30). Histologically observed low red blood cell (RBC) count and CT hypodensity suggests changes were primarily related to perfusion; however, structural changes, such as increased alveolar size, were also present. No changes in He-3 MRI lung ventilation were observed in either group. Although radiation-induced injury detected in rabbits as CT hypodensity contrasted with increased density observed in humans/rodents, the changes in ce-MRA and CT were still significantly reduced after the addition of amifostine to SBRT. Use of CT and selected MRI techniques helped to pinpoint primary physiologic changes.

Feasibility of tomotherapy-based image-guided radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer

Background: To assess the tolerance of patients with small cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiation with tomotherapy-based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).

Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of the toxicity profile for nine patients with small cell lung cancer of the limited stage who underwent chemoradiation delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) has been conducted.

Results: Acute grade 3–4 hematologic and esophagitis toxicities developed in two and three patients respectively. One patient developed a pulmonary embolism during radiotherapy. Seven patients had weight loss ranging from 0 to 30 pounds (median: 4 pounds). Three patients had treatment breaks ranging from 2 to 12 days. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range: 2–24 months), no patients developed any radiation related toxicities such as grade 3–4 pneumonitis or other long-term complications. The median survival was estimated to be 15 months. There were two local recurrences, three mediastinal recurrences, and six distant metastases.

Conclusion: Grade 3–4 toxicities remained significant during chemoradiation when radiation was delivered with tomotherapy-based IGRT. However, the absence of grade 3–4 pneumonitis is promising and the use of HT needs to be investigated in future prospective studies.

Systematic review of agents for the management of gastrointestinal mucositis in cancer patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of agents for the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal mucositis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, and no guideline possible.

RESULTS

A total of 251 clinical studies across 29 interventions were examined. Panel members were able to make one new evidence-based negative recommendation; two new evidence-based suggestions, and one evidence-based change from previous guidelines. Firstly, the panel recommends against the use of misoprostol suppositories for the prevention of acute radiation-induced proctitis. Secondly, the panel suggests probiotic treatment containing Lactobacillus spp., may be beneficial for prevention of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with malignancies of the pelvic region. Thirdly, the panel suggests the use of hyperbaric oxygen as an effective means in treating radiation-induced proctitis. Finally, new evidence has emerged which is in conflict with our previous guideline surrounding the use of systemic glutamine, meaning that the panel is unable to form a guideline. No guideline was possible for any other agent, due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated review of the literature has allowed new recommendations and suggestions for clinical practice to be reached. This highlights the importance of regular updates.

Comparative proteomic and radiobiological analyses in human lung adenocarcinoma cells

In clinic, many non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receive radiation therapy after chemotherapy failure. However, whether the multidrug resistance (MDR) can elevate the radioresistance (RDR) remains unclear. To evaluate the MDR's effect on the RDR, screen MDR- and RDR-related proteins in human lung adenocarcinoma (HLA) cells and tissues A549, and A549/DDP cells after irradiation were analyzed by colony-forming assay and flow cytometry. Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) were utilized to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between them. The value of D0, Dq, and SF2 increased, the mean percentage in G2 phase and apoptosis rate significantly decreased in A549/DDP cells compared with A549 cells. 40 DEP points were found, and among them 27 were identified through proteomics. Four up-regulated proteins (HSPB1, Vimentin, Cofilin-1, and Annexin A4) in MDR cells compared with non-MDR cells, were confirmed by Western blot. Immuno-histochemistry showed that they were also over-expressed in MDR tissues compared with non-MDR counterparts of HLA. These results proved that the MDR in HLA cells and tissues increased the RDR. HSPB1, Vimentin, Cofilin-1, and Annexin A4 are potential biomarkers for predicting HLA response to MDR and RDR, and novel treatment targets of HLA.

A systematic methodology review of phase I radiation dose escalation trials

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the methodology used in published phase I radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation trials. A specific emphasis was placed on the frequency of reporting late complications as endpoint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review using a predefined search strategy to identify all phase I trials reporting on external radiotherapy dose escalation in cancer patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-three trials (phase I: n = 36, phase I-II: n = 17) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 used a modified Fibonacci design for the RT dose escalation, but 32 did not specify a design. Late toxicity was variously defined as > 3 months (n = 43) or > 6 months (n = 3) after RT, or not defined (n = 7). In only nine studies the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was related to late toxicity, while only half the studies reported the minimum follow-up period for dose escalation (n = 26).

CONCLUSION

In phase I RT trials, late complications are often not taken into account and there is currently no consensus on the methodology used for radiation dose escalation studies. We therefore propose a decision-tree algorithm which depends on the endpoint selected and whether a validated early surrogate endpoint is available, in order to choose the most appropriate study design.

Prognostic factors differ by tumor stage for small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials

BACKGROUND

An analysis of 14 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) trials was performed to improve the current understanding of potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in groups of patients with limited-stage disease SCLC (LD-SCLC) and extensive-stage disease SCLC (ED-SCLC) separately.

METHODS

Data on 688 patients with LD-SCLC and 910 patients with ED-SCLC were included. Clinical and laboratory factors were tested for their prognostic significance using Cox regression models that were stratified by protocol. Recursive partitioning and amalgamation (RPA) analyses were used to identify prognostic subgroups.

RESULTS

Poorer performance status (PS) led to worse OS and PFS in the ED-SCLC group but not in the LD-SCLC group. The prognostic impact of PS was strong for men but weak for women in the ED-SCLC group (interaction P value <.012 for OS and PFS). Other negative prognostic factors included increased age and men for the LD-SCLC group and increased age, men, increased number of metastatic sites at baseline, and increased creatinine levels for the ED-SCLC group. In patients with the ED-SCLC, RPA analyses identified 5 subgroups with different prognosis based on baseline PS, creatinine levels, sex, and the number of metastatic sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The current pooled analysis identified baseline creatinine levels and the number of metastatic sites as important prognostic factors in patients with ED-SCLC in addition to the well established factors of sex, age, and PS. There was a significant interaction between sex and PS within the ED-SCLC group, suggesting that PS is highly prognostic in men but has no significant impact in women. Within the LD-SCLC group, only age and sex were identified as important prognostic factors. RPA analyses confirmed many of these findings.