Four Dimensional Target Volume Generation in Pulmonary Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Evaluation of the radiobiological impact of anatomic modifications during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: can we simply summate the dose?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Adaptive strategies in radiotherapy (RT) require the knowledge of the total dose given to every organ of the body. Because of anatomical changes and setup errors non-rigid registration is necessary to map the different dose fractions to a common reference. This study evaluates practically if the accumulation of all of these registered dose fractions must take radiobiology into account in a classical clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with head and neck tumors treated by chemo-RT were used. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were acquired prior and during RT following delivery of mean doses of 14.2, 24.5, 35.0 and 44.9 Gy and the planned pre-treatment helical tomotherapy sinograms were applied on the per-treatment CTs to create a series of per-treatment dose distributions corresponding to each per-treatment CT image. In order to calculate the cumulative dose distribution, the per-treatment dose maps were non-rigidly deformed by using the deformation map computed by a non-rigid registration. The deformed dose maps were then summed in two ways: one while taking radiobiology into account and one without. These two strategies were compared using clinical surrogates in the target volumes (TV) and in surrounding organs at risk (OAR).

RESULTS

The differences between the strategies, while statistically significant (p<0.05), are clinically irrelevant. In the OARs, the mean differences stay in the 0.01-0.07 Gy range for the total dose. In the targets, all mean differences stay in the 0.001-0.012 Gy range. However, some local high difference spots appear leading to punctual errors as high as 2.5 Gy.

CONCLUSION

If using current radiotherapy practices and clinical recommendations based on dose surrogates computed globally on OARs and TVs, one does not need to take radiobiological effects into account while accumulating total dose as these lead to very small differences compared to a simple accumulation technique consisting of a linear sum of the dose fractions. However, care must be taken if other adaptive strategies, based on local rather than global information, are used.

A study on the dosimetric accuracy of treatment planning for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung cancer using average and maximum intensity projection images

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of current stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) lung treatment planning methodologies on irregular breathing patterns, we have performed a systematic dosimetric evaluation in phantoms by utilizing maximum intensity projection (MIP) and average (AVG) images generated from four dimensional computed tomography (4DCT).

METHODS

A custom built programmable lung phantom was used to simulate tumor motions due to various breathing patterns of patients. 4DCT scans were obtained in helical mode, and reconstructed AVG and MIP datasets were imported into the Pinnacle 8.0 h treatment planning system. SBRT plans were generated and executed, and delivered doses were measured by radiochromic film for analysis.

RESULTS

For targets moving regularly or irregularly within a small range (7.0+/-1.8 mm, n=6), we observed good agreement between the measured and computed dose distributions. However, for targets moving irregularly with a larger range (20.8+/-2.6 mm, n=4), the measured isodose lines were found to be shifted relative to the planned distribution, resulting in an under-dosing (over 10%) in a portion of the PTV. We further observed that the discrepancy between planned and measured dose distribution is due to the inaccurate representation of irregular target motion in the MIP images generated from 4DCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Caution should be used when planning from 4DCT images in the presence of large and irregular target motion. The inaccuracy inherent in 4DCT MIP and AVG images can be mitigated through the application of methodologies to reduce respiratory motion, such as abdominal compression, and through the use of volumetric image guidance (e.g., cone beam CT-CBCT) to assure precise targeting with minimal shifts.

Effect of breathing motion in radiotherapy of breast cancer: 4D dose calculation and motion tracking via EPID

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of breathing motion in postoperative whole-breast radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For ten patients with left-sided breast cancer, radiotherapy treatment plans were generated based on conventional three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) studies: two techniques (segmented and wedge-based tangential fields) were compared. The influence of breathing motion on the dose to the target and organs at risk (OARs) was evaluated with four-dimensional (4D) dose calculation based on respiration-correlated CTs. Reproducibility of breathing motion was evaluated with electronic portal images (EPID) acquired in cine mode during treatment.

RESULTS

Differences in dose distributions were small between segmented and wedge techniques based on 3D studies. Because of small motion amplitude of the chest in the 4D CT studies (1.8 mm +/- 0.9 mm), target coverage was reduced by < 5% due to breathing motion. Differences between 3D and 4D dose calculation were similar for segmented and wedge techniques. Blurring of the dose distribution in 4D dose calculation resulted in lower doses to the OARs. Analysis of EPID movies proved good reproducibility of breathing motion observed in the 4D CT study.

CONCLUSION

Breathing motion was of minor relevance in postoperative radiotherapy treatment of breast cancer for both segmented and wedge tangential field techniques.

Mid-ventilation concept for mobile pulmonary tumors: internal tumor trajectory versus selective reconstruction of four-dimensional computed tomography frames based on external breathing motion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of direct reconstruction of mid-ventilation and peak-phase four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) frames based on the external breathing signal.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 11 patients with 15 pulmonary targets, a respiration-correlated CT study (4D CT) was acquired for treatment planning. After retrospective time-based sorting of raw projection data and reconstruction of eight CT frames equally distributed over the breathing cycle, mean tumor position (P(mean)), mid-ventilation frame, and breathing motion were evaluated based on the internal tumor trajectory. Analysis of the external breathing signal (pressure sensor around abdomen) with amplitude-based sorting of projections was performed for direct reconstruction of the mid-ventilation frame and frames at peak phases of the breathing cycle.

RESULTS

On the basis of the eight 4D CT frames equally spaced in time, tumor motion was largest in the craniocaudal direction, with 12 +/- 7 mm on average. Tumor motion between the two frames reconstructed at peak phases was not different in the craniocaudal and anterior-posterior directions but was systematically smaller in the left-right direction by 1 mm on average. The 3-dimensional distance between P(mean) and the tumor position in the mid-ventilation frame based on the internal tumor trajectory was 1.2 +/- 1 mm. Reconstruction of the mid-ventilation frame at the mean amplitude position of the external breathing signal resulted in tumor positions 2.0 +/- 1.1 mm distant from P(mean). Breathing-induced motion artifacts in mid-ventilation frames caused negligible changes in tumor volume and shape.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct reconstruction of the mid-ventilation frame and frames at peak phases based on the external breathing signal was reliable. This makes the reconstruction of only three 4D CT frames sufficient for application of the mid-ventilation technique in clinical practice.

Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study

BACKGROUND

A phase III multi-centre randomised trial (ROSEL) has been initiated to establish the role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with operable stage IA lung cancer. Due to rapid changes in radiotherapy technology and evolving techniques for image-guided delivery, guidelines had to be developed in order to ensure uniformity in implementation of stereotactic radiotherapy in this multi-centre study.

METHODS/DESIGN

A Quality Assurance Working Party was formed by radiation oncologists and clinical physicists from both academic as well as non-academic hospitals that had already implemented stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. A literature survey was conducted and consensus meetings were held in which both the knowledge from the literature and clinical experience were pooled. In addition, a planning study was performed in 26 stage I patients, of which 22 were stage 1A, in order to develop and evaluate the planning guidelines. Plans were optimised according to parameters adopted from RTOG trials using both an algorithm with a simple homogeneity correction (Type A) and a more advanced algorithm (Type B). Dose conformity requirements were then formulated based on these results.

CONCLUSION

Based on current literature and expert experience, guidelines were formulated for this phase III study of stereotactic radiotherapy versus surgery. These guidelines can serve to facilitate the design of future multi-centre clinical trials of stereotactic radiotherapy in other patient groups and aid a more uniform implementation of this technique outside clinical trials.

Lung 4D-IMRT treatment planning: an evaluation of three methods applied to four-dimensional data sets

PURPOSE

To compare 4D-dose distributions for IMRT planning on three data sets: a single 4D-CT phase, a 4D-CT phase with a density override to the tumor motion envelope (TME) volume, and the average intensity projection (AIP).

METHODS

Eight planning cases were considered. IMRT inverse planning optimization was performed on each of the three data set types, for each case considered. The plans were then applied to all ten phases of the associated 4D-CT data set. The dose to the GTV in each breathing phase was compared to the TME dose from the optimized dose distribution, as well as the GTV dose determined from a model-based deformable registration algorithm.

RESULTS

IMRT optimization on a single 3D data set resulted in a greater equivalent uniform dose (EUD) to the GTV when applied to a 4D-CT data set than the EUD for the TME in the optimized plan. The difference was up to 5.5Gy in one case. For all cases and planning techniques considered, a maximum difference of 0.3Gy in the NTDmean to the healthy lung throughout the breathing cycle was found.

CONCLUSIONS

For tumors located in the periphery of the lung, optimization on the AIP image resulted in a more uniform GTV dose throughout the breathing cycle. Averages in GTV EUD and healthy lung NTDmean taken over all the breathing phases were found to be in agreement with the dose effect parameters obtained from model-based deformable registration algorithms. All planning methods yielded GTV EUD values that were larger than the prescribed dose when the full 4D data set was considered.

Image-guided radiotherapy for liver cancer using respiratory-correlated computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography

PURPOSE

To evaluate a novel four-dimensional (4D) image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) technique in stereotactic body RT for liver tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 11 patients with 13 intrahepatic tumors, a respiratory-correlated 4D computed tomography (CT) scan was acquired at treatment planning. The target was defined using CT series reconstructed at end-inhalation and end-exhalation. The liver was delineated on these two CT series and served as a reference for image guidance. A cone-beam CT scan was acquired after patient positioning; the blurred diaphragm dome was interpreted as a probability density function showing the motion range of the liver. Manual contour matching of the liver structures from the planning 4D CT scan with the cone-beam CT scan was performed. Inter- and intrafractional uncertainties of target position and motion range were evaluated, and interobserver variability of the 4D-IGRT technique was tested.

RESULTS

The workflow of 4D-IGRT was successfully practiced in all patients. The absolute error in the liver position and error in relation to the bony anatomy was 8 +/- 4 mm and 5 +/- 2 mm (three-dimensional vector), respectively. Margins of 4-6 mm were calculated for compensation of the intrafractional drifts of the liver. The motion range of the diaphragm dome was reproducible within 5 mm for 11 of 13 lesions, and the interobserver variability of the 4D-IGRT technique was small (standard deviation, 1.5 mm). In 4 patients, the position of the intrahepatic lesion was directly verified using a mobile in-room CT scanner after application of intravenous contrast.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that 4D image guidance using liver contour matching between respiratory-correlated CT and cone-beam CT scans increased the accuracy compared with stereotactic positioning and compared with IGRT without consideration of breathing motion.