The role of dual-time combined 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the staging and restaging workup of locally advanced rectal cancer, treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy and radical surgery

Unanticipated pathological clearance in two cases of clinical T4b dMMR/MSI-h advanced colorectal cancer: the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors despite positive positron-emission tomography results

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for colorectal cancer consists of surgery and chemotherapy, which can be combined to improve outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a significant advancement in the standard treatment of metastatic, unresectable colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). However, limited data are available about the use of ICI in the neoadjuvant and conversion settings. Here, we present two cases treated with ICI.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1: A 75-year-old male with a large, borderline resectable rectal cancer diagnosed as cT4bN1bM0 who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by combination ICI consisting of ipilimumab and nivolumab. After four courses of ICI, the tumor significantly shrank, but positron emission tomography still showed a positive result and R0 resection was performed. Pathological analysis revealed no residual cancer cells. The patient has been monitored without adjuvant chemotherapy, and no recurrences have occurred after one year. Case 2: A 60-year-old male with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. The tumor partially shrank after three courses, and continued pembrolizumab monotherapy resulted in further tumor shrinkage which still showed positive positron emission tomography. Curative sigmoidectomy with partial resection of the ileum and bladder was performed, and the pathological outcome was pCR. There was no viable tumor in the specimen. The patient has been monitored without adjuvant chemotherapy for six months, and no recurrence has been observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study reports two cases, including a large, borderline resectable rectal cancer after failure of chemotherapy followed by combination treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab and one case of sigmoid colon cancer after pembrolizumab treatment, which resulted in pathological complete response. However, it remains unknown whether ICI therapy can replace surgery or diminish the optimal extent of resection, or whether adjuvant chemotherapy is needed after surgery in the case of achieving pCR after ICI therapy. Overall, this case report suggests that ICI before colorectal surgery can be effective and potentially a 'watch-and-wait" strategy could be used for cases in which ICI is effective.

Preoperative Radiotherapy with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost Compared to Chemoradiotherapy for cT3-4 Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for T3-4 rectal cancer. Here, we compared image-guided and intensity-modulated RT (IG-IMRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) (instead of concomitant chemotherapy) versus CRT in a multi-centric randomized trial.

METHODS

cT3-4 rectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive preoperative IG-IMRT 46 Gy/23 fractions plus capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily (CRT arm) or IG-IMRT 46 Gy/23 fractions with an SIB to the rectal tumor up to a total dose of 55.2 Gy (RTSIB arm).

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients were randomly assigned between April 2010 and May 2014. Grade 3 acute toxicities were 6% and 4% in the CRT and RTSIB arms, respectively. The mean fractional change in SUVmax at 5 weeks after completion of preoperative RT were -55.8% (±24.0%) and -52.9% (±21.6%) for patients in the CRT arm and RTSIB arm, respectively (p = 0.43). The pathologic complete response rate was 24% with CRT compared to 14% with RTSIB. There were no differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or local control (LC).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative RTSIB approach was not inferior to CRT in terms of metabolic response, toxicity, OS, PFS and LC, and could be considered an available option for patients unfit for fluorouracil-based CRT.

Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy

In recent years, several key advances in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer have been made, including the implementation of total mesorectal excision as the standard surgical approach; use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in selected patients with a high risk of local recurrence, and finally, adoption of organ preservation strategies, through either local excision or nonoperative management in selected patients with clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This review aims to shed light on the role of rectal MRI in the assessment of treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy, which is especially important given the growing feasibility of nonoperative management. First, an overview of current neoadjuvant therapies and response assessment based on digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI will be provided. Second, the use of a high-quality restaging rectal MRI protocol will be presented. Third, a step-by-step approach to assessing treatment response on restaging rectal MRI following neoadjuvant treatment will be outlined, acknowledging challenges faced by radiologists during MRI interpretation. Finally, research related to response assessment will be discussed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

MRI VS. FDG-PET for diagnosis of response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Aim

In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic values of MRI and FDG-PET for the prediction of the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACT) of patients with locally advanced Rectal cancer (RC).

Methods

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library, were systematically searched through December 2021 for studies that investigated the diagnostic value of MRI and FDG-PET in the prediction of the response of patients with locally advanced RC to NACT. The quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR), and the area under the ROC (AUC) of MRI and FDG-PET were calculated using a bivariate generalized linear mixed model, random-effects model, and hierarchical regression.

Results

A total number of 74 studies with recruited 4,105 locally advanced RC patients were included in this analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and AUC for MRI were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89), 5.50 (95% CI: 4.11-7.35), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.27), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively. The summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and AUC for FDG-PET were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70-0.80), 3.29 (95% CI: 2.64-4.10), 0.25 (95% CI: 0.20-0.31), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), respectively. Moreover, there were no significant differences between MRI and FDG-PET in sensitivity (P = 0.565), and NLR (P = 0.268), while the specificity (P = 0.006), PLR (P = 0.006), and AUC (P = 0.003) of MRI was higher than FDG-PET.

Conclusions

MRI might superior than FGD-PET for the prediction of the response of patients with locally advanced RC to NACT.

18 F-FDG PET/CT parameters for prediction of response to neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis in rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the role of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) parameters in the prediction of treatment response and the prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

We investigated the relationship of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters [rectal metabolic tumor volume (MTV), rectal total lesion glycolysis (TLG), rectal standard uptake value (SUV) max, rectal highest peak SUV, lymph node MTV, lymph node TLG, lymph node highest peak SUV] with the pathological response and disease-free survival (DFS) in 60 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy for a diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients with a total score of 0 were assigned to the low-risk group, patients with a score of 1 were assigned to the intermediate-risk group and patients with a score of 2 were assigned to the high-risk group.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis revealed that, from baseline PET CT parameters, lymph node highest peak SUV strongly predicted the pathological response at a cutoff value of 2.23. DFS was predicted by the lymph node highest peak SUV at a cutoff value of 3.13 and by the MTV value at a cutoff value of 27 cm 3 . The risk scoring performed with regard to rectal MTV and lymph node highest peak SUV values determined a median DFS of 19 months in patients with a risk score of 2, whereas the median DFS was not reached in patients with risk scores of 0 and 1 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study determined that rectal MTV and lymph node highest peak SUV predicted the response to neoadjuvant therapy and DFS.

The reduction of 18F-FDG uptake ability of tumor tissue after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer can effectively reflect the degree of tumor regression

Introduction

To evaluate the predictive value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT) imaging parameters for the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

From January 2016 to March 2020, 52 LARC patients who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT scans within 1 week before and 8-9 weeks after nCRT, were enrolled in this study according to a pre-designed screening criteria. After total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, we assessed tumor response to treatment and analyzed the correlation between imaging parameters obtained from two PET-CT scans and tumor regression status.

Results

Tumor response assessment showed that 13 of 52 patients received good response (GR), including 9 cases with pathological complete regression (pCR) and 4 cases with near-pathological complete regression (near-pCR). We also found that the maximum standard uptake value after nCRT (post-SUVmax), the response index (RI), the mean standard uptake values after nCRT (post-SUVmean), and the ratio of tumor SUVmean to liver SUVmean after nCRT (post-Ratio), were correlated with GR and pCR. Among these parameters, post-SUVmax and RI had a near-strong correlation with pCR (r_s= -0.58 and 0.59, respectively), and also had a strong correlation with GR (r_s = -0.7 and 0.63, respectively). Further ROC analysis showed that post-SUVmax and RI had higher values in predicting whether patients could achieve GR and pCR after nCRT, and the area under the curve (AUC) of both were greater than 0.9. The positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) of post-SUVmax for GR were 80.01% and 97.3%, and for pCR were 66.68% and 97.5%, respectively. The PPVs and NPVs of the RI values for GR were 84.61% and 94.87%, and for pCR were 69.24% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

For LARC patients, the analysis of imaging parameters such as post-SUVmax and RI, which can reflect the changes of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake capacity of tumor tissues before and after nCRT, is of great value for predicting the response of patients to neoadjuvant therapy and guiding the selection of subsequent treatment strategies.

[Dose-escalated radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A review of the literature]

For non-operable, localized esophageal cancer, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment. Currently, the radiation dose recommended is 50 to 50,4Gy. However, the optimal radiation dose remains controversial. Many studies have demonstrated that locoregional failure remains a common failure pattern, most likely to occur within the original gross tumor volume. Several retrospective studies have indicated that higher radiation dose may improve local control and survival while others failed to demonstrate improved oucomes. In three randomized trials (INT0123, ARTDECO, and CONCORDE), dose escalation did not improve locoregional control nor survival, establishing 50Gy as the standard chemoradiation dose for patients who will not undergo surgery. Here, we reviewed the results of dose escalation in the literature in the neoadjuvant and definitive settings.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging of Colorectal Cancer: 2021 Update

Preoperative imaging of rectal carcinoma involves accurate assessment of the primary tumor as well as distant metastatic disease. Preoperative imaging of nonrectal colon cancer is most beneficial in identifying distant metastases, regardless of primary T or N stage. Surgical treatment remains the definitive treatment for colon cancer, while organ-sparing approach may be considered in some rectal cancer patients based on imaging obtained before and after neoadjuvant treatment. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Current State of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer, with rectal cancer accounting for 30% of cases. The current standard of care curative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is (chemo)radiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Although neoadjuvant radiotherapy has reduced the risk of local recurrence to less than 10%, the risk of distant metastasis remained high at 30% affecting patient survival. In addition, there is a recognition that there is heterogeneity in tumor biology and treatment response with good responders potentially suitable for treatment de-escalation. Therefore, new treatment sequencing and regimens were investigated. Here, we reviewed the evidence for current neoadjuvant treatment options in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, and highlight the new challenges in this new treatment landscape.

The role of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT with respect to evaluation of pathological response in the rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in determining the correct stage and predicting the pathological response.

METHODS

Seventy one patients with pathologic proven rectal adenocarcinoma, clinical stage IIA-IVA, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were evaluated retrospectively. Radiotherapy was delivered 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions with concomitant oral capecitabine. Pelvic MRI, colonoscopy, and 18F-FDG PET-CT were performed before the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). After NAT, MRI and PET-CT were performed for re-evaluation.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 25 months (range: 3-57 months). Of the 71 patients who underwent NAT, 57 patients underwent surgery. Downstaging was recorded in 48 (84.2%) of 57 patients who underwent surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between both MRI and PET-CT with pathology results in terms of response evaluation. As a result of the comparison of MRI and PET-CT with pathological results; sensitivity and specificity were 91.6% (44/48) and 22.2% (2/9) for MRI, and 100% (47/47) and 12.5% (1/8) for PET-CT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PET-CT and MRI are effective in predicting response to NAT and predictive for the pathological response. A more accurate response can be judged when both PET-CT and MRI are executed together in restaging after NAT.

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Modern Treatment Approaches and Outcomes

AIMS

Improving pathological complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer may facilitate surgery-sparing treatment paradigms. Radiotherapy boost has been linked to higher rates of pCR; however, outcomes in moderately escalated inverse-planning studies have not been systematically evaluated. We therefore carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of radiation dose-escalation studies in the context of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for synonyms of 'rectal cancer', 'radiotherapy' and 'boost' was carried out. Studies were screened for radiotherapy prescription >54 Gy. Prespecified quality assessment was carried out for meta-analysis inclusion suitability. Pooled estimates of pCR, acute toxicity (grade ≥3) and R0 resection rates were determined with random-effects restricted maximum-likelihood estimation. Heterogeneity was assessed with Higgins I² and Cochran Q statistic. Subset analysis examined outcomes in modern inverse-planning studies. Meta-regression with permutation correction was carried out for each outcome against radiation dose, radiotherapy technique, boost technique, chemotherapy intensification and other patient- and treatment-related cofactors.

RESULTS

Forty-nine primary and three follow-up publications were included in the systematic review. Pooled estimates of pCR, toxicity and R0 resection across 37 eligible publications (n = 1817 patients) were 24.1% (95% confidence interval 21.2-27.4%), 11.2% (95% confidence interval 7.2-17.0%) and 90.7% (95% confidence interval 87.9-93.8%). Within inverse-planning studies (17 publications, n = 959 patients), these rates were 25.7% (95% confidence interval 21.0-31.1%), 9.8% (95% confidence interval 4.6-19.7%) and 95.3% (95% confidence interval 91.6-97.4%). Regression analysis did not identify any significant predictor of pCR (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy dose escalation above 54 Gy is associated with high rates of pCR and does not seem to increase the risk of acute grade ≥3 toxicity events. pCR rates approaching 25% may be achievable utilising moderate escalation (54-60 Gy) with modern inverse-planning techniques; however, a clear dose-response relationship was not identified in regression analysis and additional evidence is awaited given the prevalence of heterogenous single-arm studies to date.

FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cancer worldwide. Although its incidence is increasing, mainly in those aged under50, mortality has decreased by 50% in the more developed countries, principally due to the adoption of new practices in prevention, diagnosis and treatment. In particular, the various diagnostic imaging modalities allow improved therapeutic decision-making, evaluation of the response and early detection of recurrence. The aim of this paper is to review the available scientific evidence on the value of positron emission tomography with ¹⁸F-FDG (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in the colorectal cancer, with special emphasis on the indications of the guidelines and recommendations of the main international scientific associations regarding this imaging technique.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Staging of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancers are common tumors in the United States and appropriate imaging is essential to direct appropriate care. Staging and treatment differs between tumors arising in the colon versus the rectum. Local staging for colon cancer is less integral to directing therapy given radical resection is often standard. Surgical options for rectal carcinoma are more varied and rely on accurate assessment of the sphincter, circumferential resection margins, and peritoneal reflection. These important anatomic landmarks are best appreciated on high-resolution imaging with transrectal ultrasound or MRI. When metastatic disease is suspected, imaging modalities that provide a global view of the body, such as CT with contrast or PET/CT may be indicated. Rectal cancer often metastasizes to the liver and so MRI of the liver with and without contrast provides accurate staging for liver metastases. This article focuses on local and distant staging and reviews the appropriateness of different imaging for both variants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: dose, response and survival

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an extremely aggressive, lethal malignancy that is increasing in incidence worldwide. At present, definitive chemoradiotherapy is accepted as the standard treatment for locally advanced EC. The EC guidelines recommend a radiation dose of 50.4 Gy for definitive treatment, yet the outcomes for patients who have received standard-dose radiotherapy remain unsatisfactory. However, some studies indicate that a higher radiation dose could improve local tumor control, and may also confer survival benefits. Some studies, however, suggest that high-dose radiotherapy does not bring survival benefit. The available data show that most failures occurred in the gross target volume (especially in the primary tumor) after definitive chemoradiation. Based on those studies, we hypothesize that at least for some patients, more intense local therapy may lead to better local control and survival. The aim of this review is to evaluate the radiation dose, fractionation strategies, and predictive factors of response to therapy in functional imaging for definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma, with an emphasis on seeking the predictive model of response to CRT and trying to individualize the radiation dose for EC patients.

Advances in organ preserving strategies in rectal cancer patients

Treatment of rectal cancer patients has been subjected to change over the past thirty years. Total mesorectal excision is considered the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment, but is also associated with significant morbidity resulting in an impaired quality of life. The addition of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery has shown to improve survival and local control and may lead to a partial or even complete response (CR). This raises questions regarding the necessity for subsequent radical surgery. After careful patient selection local excision and wait-and-see approaches are explored, aiming to improve quality of life without compromising oncological outcome. A multimodality diagnostic approach for optimal staging is crucial in determining the appropriate neoadjuvant treatment regimen. Adequate endoscopic restaging of rectal tumours after multimodality treatment will aid in selecting patients who are eligible for an organ preserving approach. The role and accuracy of imaging in the detection of the primary tumour, residual rectal cancer or local recurrence seems vital. Alternative neoadjuvant regimens are currently explored to increase the rate of clinical CRs, which may support organ preserving approaches. This review aims to generate insight into the advances in diagnostics and treatment modalities in all stages of rectal cancer and will highlight future studies that may support further implementation of organ preservation treatment in rectal cancer.

Optimal Interval for 18F-FDG-PET After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) has been increasingly used to evaluate the response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer, the optimal intervals between completion of CRT, PET, and surgery have not been fully investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 148 consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who received CRT followed by FDG-PET and radical surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The association between the FDG-PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and pathological response was assessed using a logistic regression model, with a primary focus on the intervals between CRT and PET as well as between PET and surgery.

RESULTS

The baseline SUVmax showed no association with pathological response (P = .201; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.528), whereas the SUVmax after CRT completion showed a strong association (P < .001; AUC = 0.707). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the ability of the SUVmax to accurately predict pathological good responders was significantly associated with a long CRT-PET interval (≥ 7 weeks; P = .027), but was not affected by the length of PET-surgery interval. In patients with a short CRT-PET interval (< 7 weeks), the ability of the SUVmax to predict good responders was poor (P = .201; AUC = 0.669); however, in patients with long intervals (≥ 7 weeks), the predictive ability markedly improved (P < .001; AUC = 0.879).

CONCLUSION

A minimum wait time of 7 weeks is recommended before performing FDG-PET after neoadjuvant CRT for rectal cancer to obtain maximal predictive accuracy for pathological response.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background

The aim of the study was to present an update concerning several imaging modalities in diagnosis, staging and pre-surgery treatment response assessment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Modalities include: traditional morphological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI such as dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). A systematic review about the diagnostic accuracy in neoadjuvant therapy response assessment of MRI, DCE-MRI, DWI and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) has been also reported.

Methods

Several electronic databases were searched including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. All the studies included in this review reported findings about therapy response assessment in LARC by means of MRI, DCE-MRI, DWI and PET/CT with details about diagnostic accuracy, true and false negatives, true and false positives. Forest plot and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis were performed. Risk of bias and the applicability at study level were calculated.

Results

Twenty-five papers were identified. ROC curves analysis demonstrated that multimodal imaging integrating morphological and functional MRI features had the best accuracy both in term of sensitivity and specificity to evaluate preoperative therapy response in LARC. DCE-MRI following to PET/CT showed high diagnostic accuracy and their results are also more reliable than conventional MRI and DWI alone.

Conclusions

Morphological MRI is the modality of choice for rectal cancer staging permitting a correct assessment of the disease extent, of the lymph node involvement, of the mesorectal fascia and of the sphincter complex for surgical planning. Multimodal imaging and functional DCE-MRI may also help in the assessment of treatment response allowing to guide the surgeon versus conservative strategies and/or tailored approach such as “wait and see” policy.

FDG PET/CT Can Assess the Response of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Evidence From Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is indicated in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma where there is a high risk of local recurrence based on preoperative imaging. Optimal radiological assessment of CRT response is unknown, and metabolic assessment of the tumor has been suggested to gauge response before surgical resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE database was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement to identify papers comparing pre- and post-CRT PET/CT in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma with histopathological assessment of tumor regression. Papers were assessed with the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool. Meta-analysis was performed for response index (RI) and SUVmax post-CRT.

RESULTS

Ten of 69 studies met inclusion criteria containing a total of 538 patients. Methodological quality was high with low heterogeneity. In all studies, post-CRT PET/CT showed a reduction in SUVmax and the RI irrespective of histological findings. Tumors confirmed to have regressed after CRT had a mean difference of 12.21% higher RI (95% confidence interval, 6.51-17.91; P < 0.00001) compared with nonresponders. Mean difference between pre- and post-CRT SUVmax groups was -2.48 (95% confidence interval, -3.06 to -1.89; P < 0.00001) with histopathological responders having a lower post-CRT SUVmax.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that PET/CT may be a useful addition to the current imaging modalities in the assessment of treatment response.

Beyond Histologic Staging: Emerging Imaging Strategies in Colorectal Cancer with Special Focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Imaging plays an increasingly important role in the staging and management of colorectal cancer. In recent years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has supplanted transrectal ultrasound as the preferred modality for the locoregional staging of rectal cancer. Furthermore, the advent of both diffusion-weighted imaging and hepatobiliary contrast agents has significantly enhanced the ability of MRI to detect colorectal liver metastases. In clinical practice, MRI routinely provides prognostic information, helps to guide surgical strategy, and determines the need for neoadjuvant therapies related to both the primary tumor and metastatic disease. Expanding on these roles for MRI, positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI is the newest clinical hybrid imaging modality and combines the metabolic information of PET with the high soft tissue contrast of MRI. The addition of PET/MRI to the clinical staging armamentarium has the potential to provide comprehensive state-of-the-art colorectal cancer staging in a single examination.

Relative Value of Restaging MRI, CT, and FDG-PET Scan After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Management of rectal cancer has become multidisciplinary and is driven by the stage of the disease, with increased focus on restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the relative impact of restaging after preoperative chemoradiation with FDG-PET scan, CT, and MRI in the management of patients with rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study from a single institution.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center.

PATIENTS

A total of 199 patients met the inclusion criteria: patients with rectal adenocarcinoma; staged with positron emission tomography, CT, and MRI; T2 to T4, N0 to N2, M0 to M1; treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation 50.4 Gy and infusional 5-fluorouracil; and restaged 4 weeks after chemoradiation before surgery between 2003 and 2013.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparisons of the tumor stage among different imaging modalities before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation were performed. The impact of restaging on the management plan was assessed.

RESULTS

The stage at presentation was T2, 8.04%; T3, 65.33%; T4, 26.63%; N0, 17.09%; N1, 47.74%; N2, 34.67%; M0, 81.91%; and M1, 18.09%. Changes in disease stage postneoadjuvant chemoradiation were observed in 99 patients (50%). The management plans of 29 patients (15%) were changed. The impact of each restaging modality on management for all of the patients was positron emission tomography, 11%; CT, 4%; and MRI, 4%. In patients with metastatic disease at primary staging, the relative impact of each restaging modality in changing management was positron emission tomography, 32%; CT, 18%; and MRI, 6%.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its single-center and retrospective design. Operations were performed 4 weeks after restaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in the extent of disease after long-course chemoradiotherapy result in changes of management in a significant percentage of patients. Positron emission tomography has the most significant impact in the change of management overall, and its use in restaging advanced rectal cancer should be further explored.

Consolidation chemotherapy during neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for distal rectal cancer leads to sustained decrease in tumor metabolism when compared to standard CRT regimen

Background

Neoadjuvant CRT may lead to significant tumor regression in patients with rectal cancer. Different CRT regimens with consolidation chemotherapy may lead to increased rates of complete tumor regression. The purpose of this study was to understand tumor metabolic activity following two different neoadjuvant CRT regimens using sequential PET/CT imaging in two different intervals following RT.

Methods

Patients with cT2-4 N0-2 M0 rectal cancer treated by standard CRT (54Gy and 2 cycles of 5FU-based chemotherapy) or extended CRT (54Gy and 6 cycles of 5FU-based chemotherapy) underwent sequential PET/CT imaging at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks from radiation completion.

Results

99 patients undergoing standard CRT were compared to 12 patients undergoing CRT with consolidation chemotherapy. Patients treated with consolidation CRT had increased rates of complete clinical or pathological response (66 % vs. 23 %; p < 0.001). SUVmax variation between baseline and 6 weeks (88 % vs. 63 %; p < 0.001) and between baseline and 12 weeks (90 % vs. 57 %; p < 0.001) were significantly more pronounced among patients undergoing extended CRT with consolidation chemotherapy. An increase in SUVmax between 6 and 12 weeks was observed in 51 % of patients undergoing standard and 18 % of patients undergoing consolidation CRT (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Most of the reduction in tumor metabolism after neoadjuvant CRT occurs within the first 6 weeks from RT completion. In patients undergoing CRT with consolidation chemotherapy, tumors are less likely to regain metabolic activity between 6 and 12 weeks. Therefore, assessment of tumor response may be safely postponed to 12 weeks in patients undergoing extended CRT with consolidation chemotherapy.

Trial registration

NCT00254683

Predictive value of repeated F-18 FDG PET/CT parameters changes during preoperative chemoradiotherapy to predict pathologic response and overall survival in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma patients

INTRODUCTION

The goal of the current study was to investigate the predictive and prognostic values of repeated F-18 FDG PET/CT parameter changes for prediction of complete pathologic response (pCR) in patients with adenocarcinoma of locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) who received preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (PCRT).

METHODS

A total 53 patients with LAEC patients were included in the current study. All patients were evaluated by F-18 FDG PET/CT before and during chemoradiotherapy. The percent changes (∆, %) in F-18 FDG PET/CT parameters were used to predict pCR and to calculate overall survival (OS). The predictive value for pCR of F-18 FDG PET/CT cutoff values was determined by ROC analysis. The prognostic significance was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

pCR occurred in 15 patients (28.3 %). When ΔSUVmax > 23.5 % was used as cutoff, the sensitivity and specificity of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of pCR were 100 % and 52.6, respectively. The AUC was 0.750 (95 % CI; 0.612-0.859), and standard error (SE) was 0.0633 (p = 0.0002). ΔMTV resulted in 80 % sensitivity, 76.3 % specificity, and 0.731 AUC (95 % CI; 0.591-0.843, SE = 0.077, p = 0.0027) for cutoff values >25.5 %. When ΔTLG > 44.8 % was used as cutoff, the sensitivity and specificity of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of pCR were 100 and 65.8 %, respectively. The AUC was 0.893 (95 % CI; 0.777-0.961), and SE was 0.0431 (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that high ΔSUVmax, ΔMTV, and ΔTLG were associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the current study shows the capability of the changes (Δ) in repeated F-18 FDG PET/CT parameters to predict the achievement of pCR during PCRT in LAEC patients. Among the parameters, the ΔSUVmax, ΔMTV, and ΔTLG were predictors for pCR and well associated with OS.

The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A metaanalysis

BACKGROUND

To perform a metaanalysis to determine and compare the diagnostic performance of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS), and computed tomography (CT) in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy.

METHODS

All previously published articles on the role of MRI, CT, and/or ERUS in predicting the response of rectal cancer to preoperative therapy were collected. We divided the objective in 3 parts: the accuracy to assess (i) complete response, (ii) to detect T4 tumors with invasion to the circumferential resection margin (CRM), and (iii) to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis. The pooled estimates of, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated using a bivariate mixed effect analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies comprising 2,224 patients were included. (i) The pooled accuracy to assess complete tumor response were (a) 75% for MRI, (b) 82% for ERUS, (c) and 83% for CT. (ii) Pooled accuracy to detect T4 tumors with invasion to the CRM were (a) 88% and (b) 94% for ERUS. (iii) Pooled accuracy to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis was (a) 72% for MRI, (b) 72% for ERUS, (c) and 65% for CT.

CONCLUSION

MRI, CT, and ERUS cannot be used to predict complete response of locally advanced rectal cancer after CRT. In addition, the positive predictive value for these imaging techniques is low for the assessment of tumor invasion in the CRM. The accuracy of the modalities to predict the presence of metastatic lymph node disease is also low.

New Perspectives on Predictive Biomarkers of Tumor Response and Their Clinical Application in Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and can improve local control and survival outcomes. However, the responses of individual tumors to CRT are not uniform and vary widely, from complete response to disease progression. Patients with resistant tumors can be exposed to irradiation and chemotherapy that are both expensive and at times toxic without benefit. In contrast, about 60% of tumors show tumor regression and T and N down-staging. Furthermore, a pathologic complete response (pCR), which is characterized by sterilization of all tumor cells, leads to an excellent prognosis and is observed in approximately 10-30% of cases. This variety in tumor response has lead to an increased need to develop a model predictive of responses to CRT in order to identify patients who will benefit from this multimodal treatment. Endoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, serum carcinoembryonic antigen, and molecular biomarkers analyzed using immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiling are the most commonly used predictive models in preoperative CRT. Such modalities guide clinicians in choosing the best possible treatment options and the extent of surgery for each individual patient. However, there are still controversies regarding study outcomes, and a nomogram of combined models of future trends is needed to better predict patient response. The aim of this article was to review currently available tools for predicting tumor response after preoperative CRT in rectal cancer and to explore their applicability in clinical practice for tailored treatment.

The role of diffusion-weighted MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of pathologic complete response after radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review

After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer, 15-27% of the patients experience a pathological complete response (pCR). This observation raises the question as to whether invasive surgery could be avoided in a selected cohort of patients who obtain a clinical complete response after preoperative RCT. In this respect, there has been growing interest in functional imaging techniques to improve clinical response assessment. This systematic review focuses on the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in the prediction of pCR after RCT for rectal cancer. A total of 14 publications on DWI and 25 on (18)F-FDG PET/CT were retrieved. Pooled analysis of individual patient data shows both imaging modalities have a low positive predictive value in the prediction of pCR (mean PPV of 54% and 39% for DWI- and (18)F-FDG PET/CT-based parameters respectively). Especially pre-RCT imaging is unable to predict pCR with overall accuracies of 68-72% for DWI and 44% for (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Qualitative DWI assessment 5-10weeks after the end of RCT may outperform apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-based DWI-parameters (overall accuracy of 87% vs. 74-78%). Although few data are available, early changes in FDG-uptake seem promising in the prediction of pCR and the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT during RCT should be further investigated. Quantitative and qualitative (18)F-FDG PET/CT measurements are equally effective in the assessment of pCR after RCT. The major strength of DWI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT lies in the identification of non-responders who are not candidates for organ preservation. Up to now, DWI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT are not accurate enough to safely select patients for organ-sparing strategies. Future research must focus on the integration of functional imaging with clinical data and molecular biomarkers.

Biomarkers and Molecular Imaging as Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Standard treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by surgery. Tumor regression after NCRT varies substantially among individuals and pathological complete response is a known prognostic factor for LARC. The identification of a predictive model for response to chemoradiotherapy would help clinicians to identify patients who would probably benefit from multimodal treatment and to perform an early assessment of individual prognosis. Carcinoembryonic antigen has proven to be a good predictor of response in several clinical trials. Other widely studied predictive models in LARC include molecular biomarkers, analyzed at various levels and by different techniques, and molecular imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Although none of the studied markers have been approved in clinical practice, their evaluation in larger, prospective trials and in combined predictive models could be of use to define tailored therapeutic strategies.

Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT methods of analysis for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT semiquantitative parameters for locally advanced low rectal cancer (LARC) treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT).

METHODS

68 patients with LARC had (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans twice (baseline and 5-6 weeks post-nCRT). All patients underwent surgery with preservation of the sphincter 8 weeks later. (18)F-FDG PET/CT analysis was performed by visual response assessment (VRA) and semiquantitative parameters: SUVmax(baseline), SUVmean(baseline), MTV(baseline), TLG(baseline), SUVmax(post-nCRT), SUVmean(post-nCRT), MTV(post-nCRT), TLG(post-nCRT); ΔSUVmax and mean and Response indexes (RImax% and RImean%). Assessment of nCRT tumor response was performed according to the Mandard's Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) and (y)pTNM staging on the surgical specimens. Concordances of VRA with TRG, and with (y)pTNM criteria were evaluated by Cohen's K. Results were compared by t student test for unpaired groups. ROC curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

VRA analysis of post-nCRT (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan for the (y)pTNM outcome showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 87.5%, 66.7%, 83.8%, 92.5%, and 53.3%, respectively. Concordances of VRA with TRG and with (y)pTNM were moderate. For the outcome variable TRG, the statistical difference between responders and non-responders was significant for SUVmax(post-nCRT) and RImean%; for the outcome variable (y)pTNM, there was a significant difference for MTV(baseline), SUVmax(post-nCRT), SUVmean(post-nCRT), MTV(post-nCRT), RImax%, and RImean%. ROC analysis showed better AUCs: for the outcome variable TRG for SUVmax(post-nCRT), SUVmean(post-nCRT), and RImean%; for the outcome variable (y)pTNM for MTVbaseline, SUVmax(post-nCRT), SUVmean(post-nCRT), MTV(post-nCRT), RImax%, and RImean%. No significant differences among parameters were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative and semiquantitative evaluations for (18)F-FDG PET/CT are the optimal approach; a valid parameter for response prediction has still to be established.

How can we determine the best neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen for rectal cancer?

SUMMARY 

The current management of patients with clinically defined ‘locally advanced rectal cancer’ often involves fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. The focus remains primarily on reducing local recurrence, and improving survival, with organ preservation an increasing target. The best neoadjuvant CRT is the most effective regimen, balanced against the tolerability and late functional consequences, which should be selected for the individual according to their individual risk of local and distant recurrence. Hence, what makes the best neoadjuvant treatment depends on the activity and toxicity of the particular schedule, the aims of treatment, the individual disease characteristics and the individual patient pharmacogenomics. Current research efforts focus on enhancing the efficacy of CRT by integrating additional cytotoxics and biologically targeted agents.

Prediction of response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with surgery has become a standard treatment strategy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The pathological response is an important prognostic factor for LARC. The variety of tumor responses has increased the need to find a useful predictive model for the response to CRT to identify patients who will really benefit from this multimodal treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), serum carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA), molecular biomarkers analyzed by immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiling are the most used predictive models in LARC. The majority of predictors have yielded encouraging results, but there is still controversy. Diffusion-weighted MRI may be the best model to detect the dynamic changes of rectal cancer and predict the response at an early stage. Gene expression profiling and single nucleotide polymorphisms hold considerable promise to unveil the underlying complex genetics of response to CRT. Because each parameter has its own inherent shortcomings, combined models may be the future trend to predict the response.

Is diffusion-weighted MRI superior to FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT in evaluating and predicting pathological response to preoperative neoadjuvant therapy in patients with rectal cancer?

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) in evaluating and predicting pathological response to preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature research was conducted to identify the relevant studies for this meta-analysis. Combined sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies including 1564 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity (81% [95% CI 74-86%] vs 85% [95% CI 75-91%]) and NPV (80% [95% CI 68-89%] vs 91% [95% CI 80-95%]) for FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT were significantly lower than those for DW-MRI (P < 0.05). No differences were observed in pooled specificity and PPV between DW-MRI and FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT. Further subgroup analyses showed that DW-MRI had higher sensitivity on adenocarcinomas alone than on those including mucinous-type adenocarcinomas (92% [95% CI 83-99%] vs 76% [95% CI 63-90%], P = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

DW-MRI is superior to FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT in predicting and evaluating pathological responses to preoperative NCRT in patients with rectal cancer. However, its relatively low specificity and PPV limit its application in clinic, making it currently inappropriate to monitor such patients, especially those with mucinous-type rectal adenocarcinomas.

Prospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT predictive value in patients with low rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and conservative surgery

This study prospectively assessed ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in predicting the response of locally advanced low rectal cancer (LRC) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Methods. 56 patients treated with chemoradiation underwent two ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans (baseline and 5-6 weeks post-nCRT). ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (SUVmax and SUVmean) and differences between baseline (SUV1) and post-nCRT (SUV2) scans (ΔSUV and RI%) were evaluated. Results were related to the Mandard's TRG and (y)pTNM. Results. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV resulted in 88.6%, 66.7%, 83.92%, 90.7%, and 61.5%. SUV2 resulted in better than SUV1 to predict nCRT response by TRG, with no significant statistical difference between the SUVmax2 and SUVmean2 AUC (0.737 versus 0.736; P = 0.928). The same applies to the (y)pTNM (0.798 versus 0.782; P = 0.192). In relation to the TRG, RI values had a higher AUC than ΔSUV, with no significant difference between RImax and RImean (0.672 versus 0.695; P = 0.292). The same applied to the (y)pTNM (0.742 versus 0.741; P = 0.940). In both cases ΔSUV does not appear to be a good predictive tool. Logistic regression confirmed the better predictive role of SUVmax2 for the (y)pTNM (odds ratio = 1.58) and SUVmean2 for the TRG (odds ratio = 1.87). Conclusions. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can evaluate response to nCRT in LRC, even if more studies are required to define the most significant parameter for predicting pathologic tumor changes.

18F-FDG PET predicts pathological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with primary rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting pathological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with primary rectal cancer.

METHODS

Potentially relevant articles were searched in the databases of PubMed and Embase from January 1990 to September 2013. The Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria was employed to assess the quality of all of the included studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and the area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was obtained. Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eligible studies involving 1527 patients were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Four main quantitative or qualitative parameters [response index (RI), post-treatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax-post), visual response (VR) and the percentage change in total lesion glycolysis (TLG) before and after CRT (deltaTLG%)] related to PET or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) were assessed for the prediction of histopathological response. The pooled sensitivities of these four parameters were comparable and were 74, 74, 75 and 78%, respectively (P>0.05). The pooled specificity of deltaTLG% was higher than that of the other three parameters (RI, SUVmax-post and VR) and was 81, 66, 64 and 67%, respectively (P<0.05). The results from subgroup analysis showed that the RI and SUVmax-post had higher specificity in predicting tumor regression grade (TRG) than complete pathological response (pCR) [RI, 71 vs. 59% (P=0.0275); SUVmax-post, 72 vs. 61% (P=0.0178)].The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the RI and SUVmax-post when the post-treatment PET or PET/CT scan was performed at two different time points (during CRT and after the completion of CRT) were 82 vs. 72% (P=0.0630) and 78 vs. 63% (P=0.0059), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FDG PET could be a potentially powerful non-invasive tool for predicting pathological response; the related parameters RI and SUVmax-post may be more suitable for the prediction of TRG than pCR. The current data also suggested that the optimum post-treatment 18F-FDG PET scan could be carried out during CRT.

T4 rectal cancer: do we always need an exenteration?

The management of rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the last few decades. Due to improvements in the multimodality treatment and the introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, previously irresectable tumours can nowadays be cured by extensive multivisceral resections. These highly complex operations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Due to optimization of chemoradiotherapy, the introduction of IORT, increasing knowledge of tumour pathology and patterns of recurrence the need for extensive surgery diminishes. The question arises which patients with T4 rectal cancer really need extensive surgery and who can safely be considered for an organ preserving approach.

Relationship between histologic response and the degree of tumor shrinkage after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly decreases local recurrence in advanced rectal cancer. We studied whether the degree of tumor shrinkage can be used as a predictor of histologic response.

METHODS

The subjects were 114 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision after receiving radiotherapy combined with uracil/tegafur (UFT) or S-1. The degree of tumor shrinkage based on barium enema examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were assessed before CRT and immediately before surgery.

RESULTS

A histologic complete response (ypCR), histologic marked regression, T and N downstaging were associated with significantly higher tumor-shrinkage rates on barium enema (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively) as well as on MRI (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P = 0.01, respectively). On multivariate analysis, ypCR and histologic marked regression were significantly related only to tumor-shrinkage rates on barium enema (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and were not related to tumor-shrinkage rates on MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of tumor shrinkage is closely related to the final histologic response. Two-dimensionally evaluated tumor-shrinkage rates based on barium enema are adequate for the prediction of histologic response.

The diagnostics of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent human malignant neoplasms. CRC has an estimated incidence of more than 1,000,000 new cases annually worldwide. Approximately one out of three people who develop CRC dies from the disease. Furthermore, CRC often affects inhabitants of industrialized countries in comparison to less developed countries. Several markers of colon cancer, including CEA, CA-19-9, TPS, TAG-72 and lysosomal hydrolases, have been identified and are now being adopted in routine clinical practice. Increased values of these markers are often the first signal of recurrence or metastases, which is useful in prediction and prognosis of clinical outcome of patients with CRC. Determination of the activity of lysosomal exoglycosidases in body fluids may bring some hope of improving diagnosis of colorectal cancer. However, it has to be remembered that currently the most effective diagnostic method of CRC is endoscopy.

How reliable is current imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?

In patients with advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemo radiotherapy provides tumor downstaging and downsizing and complete pathological response in up to 30% of cases. After proctectomy complete pathological response is associated with low rates of local recurrence and excellent long term survival. Several authors claim a less invasive surgery or a non operative policy in patients with partial or clinical complete response respectively, however to identify patients with true complete pathological response before surgical resection remains a challenge. Current imaging techniques have been reported to be highly accurate in the primary staging of rectal cancer, however neoadjuvant therapy course produces deep modifications on cancer tissue and on surrounding structures such as overgrowth fibrosis, deep stroma alteration, wall thickness, muscle disarrangement, tumor necrosis, calcification, and inflammatory infiltration. As a result, the same imaging techniques, when used for restaging, are far less accurate. Local tumor extent may be overestimated or underestimated. The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, rectal ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography using 18F-fluoro-2’-deoxy-D-glucose ranges between 25% and 75% being less than 60% in most studies, both for rectal wall invasion and for lymph nodes involvement. In particular the ability to predict complete pathological response, in order to tailor the surgical approach, remains low. Due to the radio-induced tissue modifications, combined with imaging technical aspects, low rate accuracy is achieved, making modern imaging techniques still unreliable in restaging rectal cancer after chemo-radiotherapy.

Neither FDG-PET Nor CT can distinguish between a pathological complete response and an incomplete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare the ability of flourodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) to identify a pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with rectal cancer treated by chemoradiation.

BACKGROUND

A major obstacle in pursuing nonoperative management in patients with rectal cancer after chemoradiation is the inability to identify a pCR preoperatively.

METHODS

A total of 121 patients with rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled. FDG-PET scans and helical CT scans were obtained before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Consensus readings of PET and CT scans were used to classify certainty of disease (5-point confidence rating scale). The ability of PET and CT scans to accurately distinguish a pCR (ypT0) from an incomplete response (ypT1-4) was estimated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients, 26 (21%) had a pCR. PET and CT scans were equally inadequate at distinguishing a pCR from an incomplete response (AUC = 0.64 for both, P = 0.97). Among the 26 patients with a pCR, 14 (54%) and 5 (19%) were classified as complete responders on PET and CT scans, respectively. Among the 95 patients with an incomplete pathological response, 63 (66%) and 90 (95%) were classified as incomplete responders on PET and CT scans, respectively. None of the individual PET parameters, including visual response score, mean standard uptake value (SUVmean), maximum SUV (SUVmax), and total lesion glycolysis, accurately distinguished a pCR (AUCs = 0.57-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither PET nor CT scans have adequate predictive value to be clinically useful in distinguishing a pCR from an incomplete response and, therefore, should not be obtained for the purpose of attempting to predict a pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.