PET/CT for radiotherapy treatment planning in patients with soft tissue sarcomas

The role of 18F-FDG PET in minimizing variability in gross tumor volume delineation of soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Accurate gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation is a critical step in radiation therapy treatment planning. However, it is reader dependent and thus susceptible to intra- and inter-reader variability. GTV delineation of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) often relies on CT and MR images.

PURPOSE

This study investigates the potential role of 18F-FDG PET in reducing intra- and inter-reader variability thereby improving reproducibility of GTV delineation in STS, without incurring additional costs or radiation exposure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three readers performed independent GTV delineation of 61 patients with STS using first CT and MR followed by CT, MR, and 18F-FDG PET images. Each reader performed a total of six delineation trials, three trials per imaging modality group. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to assess both intra- and inter-reader variability using generated simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) GTVs as ground truth. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon signed-ranked test.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant decrease in both intra- and inter-reader variability in GTV delineation using CT, MR 18F-FDG PET images vs. CT and MR images. This was translated by an increase in the DSC score and a decrease in the HD for GTVs drawn from CT, MR and 18F-FDG PET images vs. GTVs drawn from CT and MR for all readers and across all three trials.

CONCLUSION

Incorporation of 18F-FDG PET into CT and MR images decreased intra- and inter-reader variability and subsequently increased reproducibility of GTV delineation in STS.

Comparison of local recurrence with conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity

PURPOSE

The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity is increasing, but no large-scale direct comparison has been reported between conventional external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and IMRT.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and December 2010, 319 consecutive adult patients with primary nonmetastatic extremity STS were treated with limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) at a single institution. Conventional EBRT was used in 154 patients and IMRT in 165 with similar dosing schedules. Median follow-up time for the cohort was 58 months.

RESULTS

Treatment groups were comparable in terms of tumor location, histology, tumor size, depth, and use of chemotherapy. Patients treated with IMRT were older (P = .08), had more high-grade lesions (P = .05), close (< 1 mm) or positive margins (P = .04), preoperative radiation (P < .001), and nerve manipulation (P = .04). Median follow-up was 90 months for patients treated with conventional EBRT and 42 months for patients treated with IMRT. On multivariable analysis adjusting for patient age and tumor size, IMRT retained significance as an independent predictor of reduced LR (hazard ratio = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.89; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Despite a preponderance of higher-risk features (especially close/positive margin) in the IMRT group, IMRT was associated with significantly reduced local recurrence compared with conventional EBRT for primary STS of the extremity.

Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in soft-tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

The present observational study reports the results of a multi-institutional dummy-run designed to estimate the consistency of interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in two different cases of soft-tissue sarcomas in which postoperative and preoperative radiotherapy were prescribed, respectively. The purpose of this work was to quantify interobserver variability in routine clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two different cases of soft-tissues sarcomas were chosen: a case of postoperative and a case of preoperative radiation therapy. Participating centres were requested to delineate clinical target volumes according to their experience in both cases. Descriptive statistic was calculated for each variable (volume, diameters) separately for two cases. Box-whiskers plots were used for presentation of clinical target volume. A Shapiro-Wilk's test was performed to evaluate the departures from normality distribution for each variable. The comparison between relative variations of diameters was evaluated using the Student's t test.

RESULTS

Several variations affecting both volumes and diameters were observed. Main variations were observed in the craniocaudal and laterolateral diameters. Each case showed similar dispersion, indicating a lack of reproducibility in volumes definition.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study highlighted that, in the absence of specific instructions or guidelines, the interobserver variability can be significant both in postoperative and preoperative radiotherapy of soft-tissue sarcomas.

Perioperative irradiation in extremity soft tissue sarcoma

Adjuvant radiotherapy constitutes an important component of the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. Extremity soft tissue sarcomas constitute a large proportion of this rare mesenchymal tumor. Questions regarding timing, techniques and toxicity come into play about optimizing adjuvant radiotherapy. This article will discuss recent trends and outcomes of perioperative, that is, preoperative and postoperative, irradiation.