1
|
Kuperman VY, Altundal Y, Kandel S, Kouskoulas TN. Dose conformity and falloff in single-lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14415. [PMID: 38924344 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) aims at achieving highly conformal dose distribution and, at the same time, attaining rapid dose falloff outside the treatment target. SRS is performed using different techniques including dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). PURPOSE In this study, we compare dose conformity and falloff in DCA and VMAT plans for SRS with a single target. METHODS To compare dose conformity in SRS plans, we employ a novel conformity indexC I d e x p $C{I}_{{d}_{exp}}$ , RTOG conformity index (C I R T O G $C{I}_{RTOG}$ ), and Riet-Paddick conformity index (C I R P $C{I}_{RP}$ ). In addition, we use indicesR 50 % $R50\% $ ,V 10 G y ${V}_{10Gy}$ , andV 12 G y ${V}_{12Gy}$ to evaluate dose falloff. For each of the considered 118 cases of SRS, two plans were created using DCA and VMAT. A two-tailed Student's t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the employed indices for the DCA and VMAT plans. RESULTS The studied VMAT plans were characterized by higher dose conformity than the DCA plans. The differences between the conformity indices for the DCA plans and VMAT plans were statistically significant. The DCA plans had a smaller number of monitor units (MUs) and smaller indices R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy than the VMAT plans. However, the differences between R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy for the DCA and VMAT plans were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Although the studied VMAT plans had higher dose conformity, they also had larger MUs than the DCA plans. In terms of dose falloff characterized by parameters R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy, DCA serves as a reasonable alternative to VMAT in the case of a single brain metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim Y Kuperman
- Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, Hudson, Florida, USA
| | - Yücel Altundal
- Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, Hudson, Florida, USA
| | - Sunil Kandel
- Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, Hudson, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sakai Y, Kubo K, Monzen H, Ueda Y, Tanooka M, Miyazaki M, Ishii K, Kawamorita R. Exploring feasibility criteria for stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of multiple brain metastases using five linac machines. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14413. [PMID: 38923786 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to find descriptors that correlates with normal brain dose to determine the feasibility of performing fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for multiple brain metastases (BMs) using five linac machines. METHODS Thirty-two patients with 1-30 BMs were enrolled. Treatment plans were created using TrueBeam, Novalis Tx, TrueBeam Edge, Halcyon, and Tomotherapy linacs. The sum of all planning target volumes (PTVs) was defined as PTVall, and the brain region excluding PTVall was defined as normal brain. The total surface area (TSA) of the PTV was calculated from the sum of the surface areas of the equivalent spheres for each PTV. Volumes receiving more than 5, 12, and 18 Gy (V5Gy, V12Gy, and V18Gy, respectively) were used for evaluation of normal brain dose. Correlations between normal brain dose and each tumor characteristic (number, PTVall, and TSA) were investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS Correlations between each characteristic and normal brain dose were statistically significant (p < 0.05) across all machines. The correlation coefficients between each characteristic and V18Gy for the five machines were as follows: tumor number, 0.39-0.60; PTVall, 0.79-0.93; TSA, 0.93-0.99. The fit equations between TSA and V18Gy exhibited high coefficients of determination, ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 across five machines. CONCLUSION This study devised fractionated SRS plans using for 1-30 BMs across five linac machines to find descriptors for determining SRS feasibility based on normal brain dose. TSA proved to be a promising descriptor of SRS feasibility for treating multiple BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Sakai
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuki Kubo
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hajime Monzen
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ueda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masao Tanooka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Miyazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ishii
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tane General Hospital, Nishi-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryu Kawamorita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tane General Hospital, Nishi-ku, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sagawa T, Ikawa T, Ohira S, Kanayama N, Ueda Y, Inui S, Miyazaki M, Konishi K. What is the optimal isodose line for stereotactic radiotherapy for single brain metastases using HyperArc? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14408. [PMID: 38863310 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to investigate the optimal isodose line (IDL) in linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for single brain metastasis, using HyperArc. We compared the dosimetric parameters for target and normal brain tissue among six plans with different IDLs. METHODS This study included 30 patients with single brain metastasis. We retrospectively generated six plans for each tumor with different IDLs (80%, 70%, 60%, 50%, 40%, and 33%) using HyperArc. All treatment plans were normalized to the prescription dose of 35 Gy in five fractions which was covered by 95% of the planning target volume (PTV), defined by adding a 1.0 mm margin to the gross tumor volume (GTV). The dosimetric parameters were compared among the six plans. RESULTS For GTV > 0.1 cm3, the ratio of brain-GTV volumes receiving 25 Gy to PTV (V25Gy/PTV) was significantly lower at IDL 40%-70% than at IDL 80% and 33% (p < 0.01, retrospectively). For GTV < 0.1 cm3, V25Gy/PTV decreased continuously as IDL decreased. The values of D99% and D80% for GTV increased with decreasing IDL. An IDL of 50% or less was required to achieve D99% of greater than 43 Gy and D80% of greater than 50 Gy. The mean values of D99% and D80% for IDL 50% were 44.3 and 51.9 Gy. CONCLUSION The optimal IDL is 40%-50% for GTV > 0.1 cm3. These lower IDLs could increase D99% and D80% of GTV while lowering V25Gy of normal brain tissue, which may help reduce the risk of radiation necrosis and improve local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Sagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shingo Ohira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ueda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shoki Inui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Miyazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doğan B, Demir H, Işık N, Gunalp G, Günbey HP, Yaprak G. Investigation of the risk factors in the development of radionecrosis in patients with brain metastases undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1022-1028. [PMID: 38426391 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidence, timing, and the factors predictors radionecrosis (RN) development in brain metastases (BMs) undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). METHODS The study evaluated 245 BMs who exclusively received SRT between 2010 and 2020. RN was detected pathologically or radiologically. RESULTS The median of follow-up was 22.6 months. RN was detected in 18.4% of the metastatic lesions, and 3.3% symptomatic, 15.1% asymptomatic. The median time of RN was 22.8 months (2.5-39.5), and the rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 16.8%, 41.4%, and 66%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that Graded Prognostic Assessment (P = .005), Score Index of Radiosurgery (P = .015), Recursive Partitioning Analysis (P = .011), the presence of primary cancer (P = .004), and localization (P = .048) significantly increased the incidence of RN. No significant relationship between RN and brain-gross tumour volume doses, planning target volume, fractionation, dose (P > .05). Multivariate analysis identified SIR > 6 (OR: 1.30, P = .021), primary of breast tumour (OR: 2.33, P = .031) and supratentorial localization (OR: 3.64, P = .025) as risk factors. CONCLUSIONS SRT is used effectively in BMs. The incidence of RN following SRT is undeniably frequent. It was observed that the incidence rate increased as the follow-up period increased. We showed that brain-GTV doses are not predictive of RN development, unlike other publications. In study, a high SIR score and supratentorial localization were identified as factors that increased the risk of RN. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE RN is still a common complication after SRT. Symptomatic RN is a significant cause of morbidity. The causes of RN are still not clearly identified. In many publications, brain dose and volumes have been found to be effective in RN. But, with this study, we found that brain dose volumes and fractionation did not increase the incidence of RN when brain doses were taken into account. The most important factor in the development of RN was found to be related to long survival after SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bedriye Doğan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Malatya, 44280, Turkey
| | - Harun Demir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Konya, 42020, Turkey
| | - Naciye Işık
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Istanbul, 34100, Turkey
| | - Gun Gunalp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Istanbul, 34100, Turkey
| | - Hediye Pınar Günbey
- Department of Radiology, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Istanbul, 34100, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Yaprak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Istanbul, 34100, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lehrer EJ, Breen WG, Singh R, Palmer JD, Brown PD, Trifiletti DM, Sheehan JP. Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01093. [PMID: 38511946 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important weapon in the management of brain metastases. Single-fraction SRS is associated with local control rates ranging from approximately 70% to 100%, which are largely dependent on lesion and postoperative cavity size. The rates of local control and improved neurocognitive outcomes compared with conventional whole-brain radiation therapy have led to increased adoption of SRS in these settings. However, when treating larger targets and/or targets located in eloquent locations, the risk of normal tissue toxicity and adverse radiation effects within healthy brain tissue becomes significantly higher. Thus, hypofractionated SRS has become a widely adopted approach, which allows for the delivery of ablative doses of radiation while also minimizing the risk of toxicity. This approach has been studied in multiple retrospective reports in both the postoperative and intact settings. While there are no reported randomized data to date, there are trials underway evaluating this paradigm. In this article, we review the role of hypofractionated SRS in the management of brain metastases and emerging data that will serve to validate this treatment approach. Pertinent articles and references were obtained from a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mayo ZS, Billena C, Suh JH, Lo SS, Chao ST. The dilemma of radiation necrosis from diagnosis to treatment in the management of brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S56-S65. [PMID: 38437665 PMCID: PMC10911797 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiation therapy is a mainstay of treatment for patients with brain metastases. The use of SRS in the management of brain metastases is becoming increasingly common and provides excellent local control. Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN) is a late complication of radiation treatment that can be seen months to years following treatment and is often indistinguishable from tumor progression on conventional imaging. In this review article, we explore risk factors associated with the development of radiation necrosis, advanced imaging modalities used to aid in diagnosis, and potential treatment strategies to manage side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Cole Billena
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mann T, Ploquin N, Faruqi S, Loewen S, Thind K. Stereotactic Optimized Automated Radiotherapy (SOAR): a novel automated planning solution for multi-metastatic SRS compared to HyperArc™. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:025037. [PMID: 38364285 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad2a1b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Automated Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) planning solutions improve clinical efficiency and reduce treatment plan variability. Available commercial solutions employ a template-based strategy that may not be optimal for all SRS patients. This study compares a novel beam angle optimized Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning solution for multi-metastatic SRS to the commercial solution HyperArc.Approach.Stereotactic Optimized Automated Radiotherapy (SOAR) performs automated plan creation by combining collision prediction, beam angle optimization, and dose optimization to produce individualized high-quality SRS plans using Eclipse Scripting. In this retrospective study 50 patients were planned using SOAR and HyperArc. Assessed dose metrics included the Conformity Index (CI), Gradient Index (GI), and doses to organs-at-risk. Complexity metrics evaluated the modulation, gantry speed, and dose rate complexity. Plan dosimetric quality, and complexity were compared using double-sided Wilcoxon signed rank tests (α= 0.05) adjusted for multiple comparisons.Main Results.The median target CI was 0.82 with SOAR and 0.79 with HyperArc (p < .001). Median GI was 1.85 for SOAR and 1.68 for HyperArc (p < .001). The median V12Gy normal brain volume for SOAR and HyperArc were 7.76 cm3and 7.47 cm3respectively. Median doses to the eyes, lens, optic nerves, and optic chiasm were statistically significant favoring SOAR. The SOAR algorithm scored lower for all complexity metrics assessed.Significance.In-house developed automated planning solutions are a viable alternative to commercial solutions. SOAR designs high-quality patient-specific SRS plans with a greater degree of versatility than template-based methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Mann
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nicolas Ploquin
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Salman Faruqi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shaun Loewen
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kundan Thind
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jung H, Yoon J, Dona Lemus O, Tanny S, Zhou Y, Milano M, Usuki K, Hardy S, Zheng D. Dosimetric evaluation of LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with more than 20 targets: comparing MME, HyperArc, and RapidArc. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:19. [PMID: 38326813 PMCID: PMC10848506 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02416-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the dosimetric quality of three widely used techniques for LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) with more than 20 targets: dynamic conformal arc (DCA) in BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME) module and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using RapidArc (RA) and HyperArc (HA) in Varian Eclipse. METHODS Ten patients who received single-isocenter fSRS with 20-37 targets were retrospectively replanned using MME, RA, and HA. Various dosimetric parameters, such as conformity index (CI), Paddick CI, gradient index (GI), normal brain dose exposures, maximum organ-at-risk (OAR) doses, and beam-on times were extracted and compared among the three techniques. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS All plans achieved the prescribed dose coverage goal of at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). HA plans showed superior conformity compared to RA and MME plans. MME plans showed superior GI compared to RA and HA plans. RA plans resulted in significantly higher low and intermediate dose exposure to normal brain compared to HA and MME plans, especially for lower doses of ≥ 8Gy and ≥ 5Gy. No significant differences were observed in the maximum dose to OARs among the three techniques. The beam-on time of MME plans was about two times longer than RA and HA plans. CONCLUSIONS HA plans achieved the best conformity, while MME plans achieved the best dose fall-off for LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction SRS with more than 20 targets. The choice of the optimal technique should consider the trade-offs between dosimetric quality, beam-on time, and planning effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunuk Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Jihyung Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Olga Dona Lemus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sean Tanny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Yuwei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Michael Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Usuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sara Hardy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Salans M, Ni L, Morin O, Ziemer B, Capaldi DPI, Raleigh DR, Vasudevan HN, Chew J, Nakamura J, Sneed PK, Boreta L, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Theodosopoulos P, Braunstein S. Adverse radiation effect versus tumor progression following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Implications of radiologic uncertainty. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:535-546. [PMID: 38316705 PMCID: PMC10876820 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04578-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse radiation effect (ARE) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is challenging to distinguish from tumor progression. This study characterizes the clinical implications of radiologic uncertainty (RU). METHODS Cases reviewed retrospectively at a single-institutional, multi-disciplinary SRS Tumor Board between 2015-2022 for RU following SRS were identified. Treatment history, diagnostic or therapeutic interventions performed upon RU resolution, and development of neurologic deficits surrounding intervention were obtained from the medical record. Differences in lesion volume and maximum diameter at RU onset versus resolution were compared with paired t-tests. Median time from RU onset to resolution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate associations between clinical characteristics and time to RU resolution were assessed with Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS Among 128 lesions with RU, 23.5% had undergone ≥ 2 courses of radiation. Median maximum diameter (20 vs. 16 mm, p < 0.001) and volume (2.7 vs. 1.5 cc, p < 0.001) were larger upon RU resolution versus onset. RU resolution took > 6 and > 12 months in 25% and 7% of cases, respectively. Higher total EQD2 prior to RU onset (HR = 0.45, p = 0.03) and use of MR perfusion (HR = 0.56, p = 0.001) correlated with shorter time to resolution; larger volume (HR = 1.05, p = 0.006) portended longer time to resolution. Most lesions (57%) were diagnosed as ARE. Most patients (58%) underwent an intervention upon RU resolution; of these, 38% developed a neurologic deficit surrounding intervention. CONCLUSIONS RU resolution took > 6 months in > 25% of cases. RU may lead to suboptimal outcomes and symptom burden. Improved characterization of post-SRS RU is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Salans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Lisa Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Olivier Morin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Benjamin Ziemer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Dante P I Capaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - David R Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (DRR), San Francisco, USA
| | - Harish N Vasudevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
| | - Jessica Chew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Jean Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Penny K Sneed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Lauren Boreta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (JEVM), San Francisco, USA
| | - Philip Theodosopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu B, Li S, Wang J, Wang J, Qiu W, Gao H. Bibliometric and visualization analysis of radiation brain injury from 2003 to 2023. Front Neurol 2024; 14:1275836. [PMID: 38298563 PMCID: PMC10828967 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1275836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Over the past two decades, the field of radiation brain injury has attracted the attention of an increasing number of brain scientists, particularly in the areas of molecular pathology and therapeutic approaches. Characterizing global collaboration networks and mapping development trends over the past 20 years is essential. Objective The aim of this paper is to examine significant issues and future directions while shedding light on collaboration and research status in the field of radiation brain injury. Methods Bibliometric studies were performed using CiteSpaceR-bibliometrix and VOSviewer software on papers regarding radiation brain injury that were published before November 2023 in the Web of Science Core Collection. Results In the final analysis, we found 4,913 records written in 1,219 publications by 21,529 authors from 5,007 institutions in 75 countries. There was a noticeable increase in publications in 2014 and 2021. The majority of records listed were produced by China, the United States, and other high-income countries. The largest nodes in each cluster of the collaboration network were Sun Yat-sen University, University of California-San Francisco, and the University of Toronto. Galldiks N, Barnett GH, Langen KJ and Kim JH are known to be core authors in the field. The top 3 keywords in that time frame are radiation, radiation necrosis, and radiation-therapy. Conclusions The objective and thorough bibliometric analysis also identifies current research hotspots and potential future paths, providing a retrospective perspective on RBI and offering useful advice to researchers choosing research topics. Future development directions include the integration of multi-omics methodologies and novel imaging techniques to improve RBI's diagnostic effectiveness and the search for new therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baofang Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Shaojie Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Jiayin Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Weizhi Qiu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Hongzhi Gao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Garcia MA, Turner A, Brachman DG. The role of GammaTile in the treatment of brain tumors: a technical and clinical overview. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:203-212. [PMID: 38261141 PMCID: PMC10834587 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04523-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Malignant and benign brain tumors with a propensity to recur continue to be a clinical challenge despite decades-long efforts to develop systemic and more advanced local therapies. GammaTile (GT Medical Technologies Inc., Tempe AZ) has emerged as a novel brain brachytherapy device placed during surgery, which starts adjuvant radiotherapy immediately after resection. GammaTile received FDA clearance in 2018 for any recurrent brain tumor and expanded clearance in 2020 to include upfront use in any malignant brain tumor. More than 1,000 patients have been treated with GammaTile to date, and several publications have described technical aspects of the device, workflow, and clinical outcome data. Herein, we review the technical aspects of this brachytherapy treatment, including practical physics principles, discuss the available literature with an emphasis on clinical outcome data in the setting of brain metastases, glioblastoma, and meningioma, and provide an overview of the open and pending clinical trials that are further defining the efficacy and safety of GammaTile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam Turner
- GT Medical Technologies, Inc., Tempe, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Spaniol M, Abo-Madyan Y, Ruder AM, Fleckenstein J, Giordano FA, Stieler F. Homogenous dose prescription in Gamma Knife Radiotherapy: Combining the best of both worlds. Phys Med 2024; 117:103202. [PMID: 38159546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery with linear accelerators (LINACs) or Leksell Gamma Knife® (LGK, Elekta AB) is an established treatment option for intracranial tumors. When those are involving/abutting organs at risk (OAR), homogenous and normofractionated treatments outmatch single fraction deliveries. In such situations, it would be desirable to balance LINAC's homogeneity benefits with LGK's dose gradient attributes. In this study, we determined homogeneity and OAR sparing ranges using a non-clinical, homogenous prototype version of LGK Lightning. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed thirty fractionated LGK Icon in-house patients with acoustic neuromas, pituitary adenomas and meningiomas. Four treatment plans were generated (54 Gy,1.8 Gy/fx) per patient: one LINAC plan, one clinical Lightning plan ("LGK") and two prototype Lightning plans ("LGK Hom" and "LGK OAR"). We analyzed Dmean and D2% for different OAR, Gradient Index (GI), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), Homogeneity Index (HI) and beam-on-time (BOT). RESULTS While the LINAC vs. Lightning plans (LGK Hom|LGK OAR|LGK) boast better homogeneity (median: 1.08 vs. 1.18|1.24|1.35) and shorter BOT (median: 137 s vs. 432 s|510 s|510 s), Lightning plans show improved GI (median: 6.68 vs. 3.86|3.50|3.19), similar PCI (median: 0.75 vs. 0.76|0.75|0.82) and significantly reduced OAR doses. For in-tumor OAR, LGK Hom and LINAC plans achieves similar OAR sparing with improved GI for LGK Hom. CONCLUSIONS This study is a preliminary attempt to combine the dosimetric advantages of LINAC and LGK treatment planning. We observed that LGK plan homogeneity can be improved toward LINAC standards while maintaining the LGK advantage of favorable OAR doses and GI. Additionally, in-tumor OAR hotspots can be considerably reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Spaniol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Yasser Abo-Madyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Arne M Ruder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Jens Fleckenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Florian Stieler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Upadhyay R, Ayan AS, Jain S, Klamer BG, Perlow HK, Zoller W, Blakaj DM, Beyer S, Grecula J, Arnett A, Thomas E, Chakravarti A, Raval RR, Palmer JD. Dose-Volume Tolerance of the Brain and Predictors of Radiation Necrosis After 3-Fraction Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: A Large Single-Institutional Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:275-284. [PMID: 37574170 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the current standard of care in patients with brain metastases and controlled extracranial disease. Radiation necrosis (RN) is the dose-limiting side effect of SRS, but the dose constraints especially for fractionated SRS remain poorly defined. We assessed the risk of RN after 3-fraction SRS with a goal to identify specific dose-volume constraints associated with grade 3 or higher RN (G3RN). METHODS AND MATERIALS A single-institutional retrospective review of patients treated with 3-fraction SRS was performed. The primary endpoint was G3RN, which was defined as severe symptoms with evidence of necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging with perfusion and/or biopsy confirmation. Tissue volume around each target lesion was contoured, and volumetric doses per lesion were recorded. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the relationship between RN and each volumetric dose, and normal tissue complication probability modeling was performed using a modified Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model. RESULTS From 2015 to 2021, 434 patients underwent 539 courses of linear accelerator-based SRS; 2518 lesions were treated. Median SRS dose was 24 Gy. Median follow-up after SRS was 7.9 months, and the median overall survival was 9 months. A total of 93 patients (17.2%) and 123 lesions (4.9%) developed any RN. Forty-two patients (7.8%) and 57 lesions (2.3%) developed G3RN. On logistic regression, V20 and V23 were best predictors of any grade RN and G3RN, respectively, with cutoff values of 4 cc, 10 cc, and 20 cc associated with <5%, <7.5%, and <10% risk of any RN, respectively, and V23 < 15 cc associated with <5% risk of G3RN. With constrained optimization of the normal tissue complication probability Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model for G3RN, we obtained a TD50 (uniform dose resulting in a 50% complication risk) of 31.4 Gy (95% CI, 27.8-35.1 Gy). CONCLUSIONS In patients receiving 3-fraction SRS, G3RN was seen in 7.8% of patients, and 2.3% of the lesions were treated. V20 and V23 were the most robust dosimetric parameters associated with RN. Further studies evaluating the outcomes and RN in patients treated with fractionated SRS compared with single-fraction SRS are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ahmet S Ayan
- Division of Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sagarika Jain
- Division of Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Brett G Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Wesley Zoller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sasha Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - John Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Andrea Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Evan Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gruber I, Weidner K, Treutwein M, Koelbl O. Stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: a retrospective study. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:202. [PMID: 38115009 PMCID: PMC10731882 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02389-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established standard for radiation therapy of brain metastases although recent developments indicate that multi-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) results in lower radiation necrosis especially for larger metastases, and the same or even better local control in comparison to SRS. METHODS Seventy-two patients with 111 brain metastases received SRS with a single dose of 18 Gy between September 2014 and December 2021. The dose prescription was either 18 Gy given to the enclosing 80% isodose with a normalization to Dmax = 100% of 22.5 Gy (part I) or 18 Gy = D98, while D0.03 cc of 21.6-22.5 Gy was accepted (part II). The study retrospectively evaluated local progression-free survival (LPFS), response on the first follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and radiation necrosis. RESULTS Melanoma brain metastases (n = 44) were the most frequent metastases. The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 0.30 cm³ (IQR, 0.17-0.61). The median follow-up time of all patients was 50.8 months (IQR, 30.4-64.6). Median LPFS was 23.5 months (95%CI 17.2, 29.8). The overall LPFS rates at 12-, 18-, 24- and 30 months were 65.3%, 56.3%, 46.5%, and 38.8%. Brain metastases with radioresistant histology (melanoma, renal cell cancer, and sarcoma) showed a 12-month LPFS of 60.2%, whereas brain metastases with other histology had a 12-month LPFS of 70.1%. The response of brain metastases on first follow-up MRIs performed after a median time of 47 days (IQR, 40-63) was crucial for long-term local control and survival. Eight brain metastases (7.2%) developed radiation necrosis after a median time of 18.4 months (IQR, 9.4-26.5). In multivariate analyses, a GTV > 0.3 cm³ negatively affected LPFS (HR 2.229, 95%CI 1.172, 4.239). Melanoma, renal cell cancers, and sarcoma had a lower chance of LPFS in comparison to other cancer types (HR 2.330, 95%CI 1.155, 4.699). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate a reasonable 1-year local control of brain metastases with radiosensitive histology. Radioresistant metastases show a comparatively poor local control. Treatment refinements merit exploration to improve local control of brain metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is retrospectively registered (ethics approval number 23-3451-104).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Gruber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, Regensburg, Bavarian, 93053, Germany.
| | - Karin Weidner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, Regensburg, Bavarian, 93053, Germany
| | - Marius Treutwein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, Regensburg, Bavarian, 93053, Germany
| | - Oliver Koelbl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, Regensburg, Bavarian, 93053, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hall J, Lui K, Tan X, Shumway J, Collichio F, Moschos S, Sengupta S, Chaudhary R, Quinsey C, Jaikumar S, Forbes J, Andaluz N, Zuccarello M, Struve T, Vatner R, Pater L, Breneman J, Weiner A, Wang K, Shen C. Factors associated with radiation necrosis and intracranial control in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 189:109920. [PMID: 37769968 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Emerging data suggest immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or radiotherapy (SRT) may work synergistically, potentially increasing both efficacy and toxicity. This manuscript characterizes factors associated with intracranial control and radiation necrosis in this group. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients had non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma and were treated from 2013 to 2021 at two institutions with ICI and SRS/SRT. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to analyze factors associated with local failure (LF) and grade 2+ (G2 + ) radiation necrosis. RESULTS There were 179 patients with 549 metastases. The median follow up from SRS/SRT was 14.7 months and the median tumor size was 7 mm (46 tumors ≥ 20 mm). Rates of LF and G2 + radiation necrosis per metastasis were 5.8% (32/549) and 6.9% (38/549), respectively. LF rates for ICI +/- 1 month from time of radiation versus not were 3% (8/264) and 8% (24/285) (p = 0.01), respectively. G2 + radiation necrosis rates for PD-L1 ≥ 50% versus < 50% were 17% (11/65) and 3% (5/203) (p=<0.001), respectively. PD-L1 ≥ 50% remained significantly associated with G2 + radiation necrosis on multivariate analysis (p = 0.03). Rates of intracranial failure were 54% (80/147) and 17% (4/23) (p = 0.001) for those without and with G2 + radiation necrosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PD-L1 expression (≥50%) may be associated with higher rates of G2 + radiation necrosis, and there may be improved intracranial control following the development of radiation necrosis. Administration of ICIs with SRS/SRT is overall safe, and there may be some local control benefit to delivering these concurrently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Kevin Lui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Xianming Tan
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - John Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Frances Collichio
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stergios Moschos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Soma Sengupta
- Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Rekha Chaudhary
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Carolyn Quinsey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sivakumar Jaikumar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jonathan Forbes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Norberto Andaluz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Mario Zuccarello
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Timothy Struve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ralph Vatner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Luke Pater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - John Breneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ashley Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Colette Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Giordano G, Griguolo G, Landriscina M, Meattini I, Carbone F, Leone A, Del Re M, Fogli S, Danesi R, Colamaria A, Dieci MV. Multidisciplinary management of HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases: An evidence-based pragmatic approach moving from pathophysiology to clinical data. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 192:104185. [PMID: 37863404 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION About 30-50 % of stage IV HER2+ breast cancers (BC) will present brain metastases (BMs). Their management is based on both local treatment and systemic therapy. Despite therapeutic advances, BMs still impact on survival and quality of life and the development of more effective systemic therapies represents an unmet clinical need. MATERIALS AND METHODS A thorough analysis of the published literature including ongoing clinical trials has been performed, investigating concepts spanning from the pathophysiology of tumor microenvironment to clinical considerations with the aim to summarize the current and future locoregional and systemic strategies. RESULTS Different trials have investigated monotherapies and combination treatments, highlighting how the blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a major problem hindering diffusion and consequently efficacy of such options. Trastuzumab has long been the mainstay of systemic therapy and over the last two decades other HER2-targeted agents including lapatinib, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine, as well as more recently neratinib, tucatinib, and trastuzumab deruxtecan, have been introduced in clinical practice after showing promising results in randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS We ultimately propose an evidence-based treatment algorithm for clinicians treating HER2 + BCs patients with BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Giordano
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - Policlinico Riuniti, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy.
| | - Gaia Griguolo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova 35128, Italy; Division of Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova 35128, Italy
| | - Matteo Landriscina
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - Policlinico Riuniti, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences M Serio, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Carbone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruher Neurozentrum, Karlsruhe 76133, Germany
| | - Augusto Leone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruher Neurozentrum, Karlsruhe 76133, Germany; Faculty of Human Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Marzia Del Re
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Fogli
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Romano Danesi
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Colamaria
- Division of Neurosurgery, Policlinico Riuniti Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova 35128, Italy; Division of Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova 35128, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
DeVries DA, Tang T, Albweady A, Leung A, Laba J, Johnson C, Lagerwaard F, Zindler J, Hajdok G, Ward AD. Predicting stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes with multi-observer qualitative appearance labelling versus MRI radiomics. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20977. [PMID: 38017055 PMCID: PMC10684869 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47702-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Qualitative observer-based and quantitative radiomics-based analyses of T1w contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T1w-CE MRI) have both been shown to predict the outcomes of brain metastasis (BM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Comparison of these methods and interpretation of radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models remains limited. To address this need, we collected a dataset of n = 123 BMs from 99 patients including 12 clinical features, 107 pre-treatment T1w-CE MRI radiomic features, and BM post-SRS progression scores. A previously published outcome model using SRS dose prescription and five-way BM qualitative appearance scoring was evaluated. We found high qualitative scoring interobserver variability across five observers that negatively impacted the model's risk stratification. Radiomics-based ML models trained to replicate the qualitative scoring did so with high accuracy (bootstrap-corrected AUC = 0.84-0.94), but risk stratification using these replicated qualitative scores remained poor. Radiomics-based ML models trained to directly predict post-SRS progression offered enhanced risk stratification (Kaplan-Meier rank-sum p = 0.0003) compared to using qualitative appearance. The qualitative appearance scoring enabled interpretation of the progression radiomics-based ML model, with necrotic BMs and a subset of heterogeneous BMs predicted as being at high-risk of post-SRS progression, in agreement with current radiobiological understanding. Our study's results show that while radiomics-based SRS outcome models out-perform qualitative appearance analysis, qualitative appearance still provides critical insight into ML model operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A DeVries
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada.
- Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - Terence Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Ali Albweady
- Department of Radiology, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, 56219, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Andrew Leung
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Joanna Laba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Carol Johnson
- Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Frank Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, 1081, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Zindler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Hague, 2512VA, The Netherlands
- Holland Proton Centre, Delft, 2629JA, The Netherlands
| | - George Hajdok
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Aaron D Ward
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
- Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ngu S, Werner C, D' Amico RS, Wernicke AG. Whole brain radiation therapy resulting in radionecrosis: a possible link with radiosensitising chemoimmunotherapy. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e256758. [PMID: 38016763 PMCID: PMC10685978 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Radionecrosis describes a rare but serious complication of radiation therapy. In clinical practice, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used in combination with systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy, either concurrently or sequentially. There is a paucity of literature regarding radionecrosis in patients receiving whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone (without additional SRS) in combination with immunotherapy or targeted therapies. It is observed that certain combinations increase the overall radiosensitivity of the tumorous lesions. We present a rare case of symptomatic radionecrosis almost 1 year after WBRT in a patient with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer on third-line chemoimmunotherapy. We discuss available research regarding factors that may lead to radionecrosis in these patients, including molecular and genetic profiles, specific drug therapy combinations and their timing or increased overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Ngu
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Cassidy Werner
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Randy S D' Amico
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bodensohn R, Maier SH, Belka C, Minniti G, Niyazi M. Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases: A Review of Treatment Techniques. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5404. [PMID: 38001664 PMCID: PMC10670108 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The advancement of systemic targeted treatments has led to improvements in the management of metastatic disease, particularly in terms of survival outcomes. However, brain metastases remain less responsive to systemic therapies, underscoring the significance of local interventions for comprehensive disease control. Over the past years, the threshold for treating brain metastases through stereotactic radiosurgery has risen. Yet, as the number of treated metastases increases, treatment complexity and duration also escalate. This trend has made multi-isocenter radiosurgery treatments, such as those with the Gamma Knife, challenging to plan and lengthy for patients. In contrast, single-isocenter approaches employing linear accelerators offer an efficient and expeditious treatment option. This review delves into the literature, comparing different linear-accelerator-based techniques with each other and in relation to dedicated systems, focusing on dosimetric considerations and feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sebastian H. Maier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.H.M.); (C.B.)
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.H.M.); (C.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, A Partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy;
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.H.M.); (C.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hsu EJ, Yan Y, Timmerman RD, Wardak Z, Dan TD, Patel TR, Vo DT, Stojadinovic S. Modeling gamma knife radiosurgical toxicity for multiple brain metastases. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109874. [PMID: 37640162 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation oncology protocols for single fraction radiosurgery recommend setting dosing criteria based on assumed risk of radionecrosis, which can be predicted by the 12 Gy normal brain volume (V12). In this study, we show that tumor surface area (SA) and a simple power-law model using only preplan variables can estimate and minimize radiosurgical toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 245-patient cohort with 1217 brain metastases treated with single or distributed Gamma Knife sessions was reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models and power-law models determined which modeling parameters best predicted V12. The V12 power-law model, represented by a product of normalized Rx dose Rxn, and tumor longest axial dimension LAD (V12 ∼ Rxn1.5*LAD2), was independently validated using a secondary 63-patient cohort with 302 brain metastases. RESULTS Surface area was the best univariate linear predictor of V12 (adjR2 = 0.770), followed by longest axial dimension (adjR2 = 0.755) and volume (adjR2 = 0.745). The power-law model accounted for 90% variance in V12 for 1217 metastatic lesions (adjR2 = 0.906) and 245 patients (adjR2 = 0.896). The average difference ΔV12 between predicted and measured V12s was (0.28 ± 0.55) cm3 per lesion and (1.0 ± 1.2) cm3 per patient. The power-law predictive capability was validated using a secondary 63-patient dataset (adjR2 = 0.867) with 302 brain metastases (adjR2 = 0.825). CONCLUSION Surface area was the most accurate univariate predictor of V12 for metastatic lesions. We developed a preplan model for brain metastases that can help better estimate radionecrosis risk, determine prescription doses given a target V12, and provide safe dose escalation strategies without the use of any planning software.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Yulong Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Robert D Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Zabi Wardak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tu D Dan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Toral R Patel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dat T Vo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Miura H, Kenjo M, Doi Y, Ueda T, Nakao M, Ozawa S, Nagata Y. Effect of Target Changes on Target Coverage and Dose to the Normal Brain in Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Brain Tumors. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101264. [PMID: 37457819 PMCID: PMC10344692 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated the dosimetric effect of tumor changes in patients with fractionated brain stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) on the tumor and normal brain using repeat verification magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the middle of the treatment period. Methods and Materials Fifteen large intracranial metastatic lesions with fractionated SRT were scanned employing standardized planning MRI (MRI-1). Repeat verification MRI (MRI-2) were performed during the middle of the irradiation period. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the volume of the contrast-enhancing lesion on T1-weighted MRI with gadolinium contrast agent. The doses to the tumor and normal brain were evaluated on the MRI-1 scan. Beam configuration and intensity on the initial volumetric modulated arc therapy plan were used to evaluate the dose to the tumor and the normal brain on MRI-2. We evaluated the effect of D98% (percent dose irradiating 98% of the volume) on the GTV using the plans on the MRI-1 and MRI-2 scans. For the normal brain, the V90%, V80%, and V50% (volume of the normal brain receiving >90%, 80%, and 50% of the prescribed dose, respectively) were investigated. Results Three (20% of the total) and 4 (26% of the total) tumors exhibited volume shrinkage or enlargement changes of >10%. Five (33% of the total) tumors exhibited volume shrinkage and enlargement changes of <10%. Three tumors (20% of the total) showed no volume changes. D98% of the GTV increased in patients with tumor shrinkage because of dose inhomogeneity and decreased in patients with tumor enlargement, with a coefficient of determination of 0.28. The V90%, V80%, and V50% increase with decreasing tumor volumes and were linearly related to the tumor volume difference with a coefficient of determination values of 0.97, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively. Conclusions Repeat verification MRI for brain fractionated SRT during the treatment period should be considered to reduce the magnitude of target underdosing or normal brain overdosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideharu Miura
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiation therapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kenjo
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiation therapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Doi
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiation therapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Taro Ueda
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiation therapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan
| | - Minoru Nakao
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiation therapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Shuichi Ozawa
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiation therapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nagata
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiation therapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima, 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Buszek SM, Tran B, Long JP, Luo D, Suki D, Li J, Ferguson S, Chung C. Postoperative Management of Recurrence After Radiosurgery and Surgical Resection for Brain Metastases and Predicting Benefit From Adjuvant Radiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e499-e503. [PMID: 37295724 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often used as upfront treatment for brain metastases. Progression or radionecrosis after SRS is common and can prompt resection. However, postoperative management strategies after resection for SRS failure vary widely, and no standard practice has been established. In this approved study, we retrospectively reviewed patients who received SRS for a brain metastasis followed by resection of the same lesion. We extracted patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables and information on disease-related outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic variables were used to create a model to predict factors associated with local failure (LF). A total of 225 patients with brain metastases treated with SRS from 2009 to 2017 followed by surgical resection were identified. Overall, 65% of cases had gross total resection (GTR) on postoperative imaging review. Twenty-one patients (9.3%) received adjuvant radiation therapy to the surgical cavity, and 204 (90.7%) were observed. Of these 204 patients, 118 had GTR with evidence of tumor within the pathology specimen. With a median follow-up of 13 months after resection, 47 patients (40%) developed LF after surgery. After salvage resection of a brain metastasis initially treated with SRS, the observed LF rate was 40% among those who had a GTR and evidence of tumor on pathologic examination. This LF rate is sufficiently high that adjuvant radiation to the surgical bed after salvage resection should be considered in these cases when there is tumor in the pathology, even after a GTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Buszek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James P Long
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dershan Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dima Suki
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
de Camargo AV, de Mattos MD, Kawasaki MK, Gomes DNS, Borges ABB, Vazquez VDL, Araujo RLC. Treatment of patients with multiple brain metastases by isolated radiosurgery: Toxicity and survival. World J Clin Oncol 2023; 14:400-408. [PMID: 37970107 PMCID: PMC10631349 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i10.400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases has been more reported recently without using whole-brain radiotherapy. Nevertheless, the sparsity of the data still claims more information about toxicity and survival and their association with both dosimetric and geometric aspects of this treatment. AIM To assess the toxicity and survival outcome of radiosurgery in patients with multiple (four or more lesions) brain metastases. METHODS In a single institution, data were collected retrospectively from patients who underwent radiosurgery to treat brain metastases from diverse primary sites. Patients with 4-21 brain metastases were treated with a single fraction with a dose of 18 Gy or 20 Gy. The clinical variables collected were relevant to toxicity, survival, treatment response, planning, and dosimetric variables. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Log-rank test were used according to the type of variable and outcomes. RESULTS From August 2017 to February 2020, 55 patients were evaluated. Headache was the most common complaint (38.2%). The median overall survival (OS) for patients with karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 70 was 8.9 mo, and this was 3.6 mo for those with KPS ≤ 70 (P = 0.047). Patients with treated lesions had a median progression-free survival of 7.6 mo. There were no differences in OS (19.7 vs 9.5 mo) or progression-free survival (10.6 vs 6.3 mo) based on prior irradiation. There was no correlation found between reported toxicities and planning, dosimetric, and geometric variables, implying that no additional significant toxicity risks appear to be added to the treatment of multiple (four or more) lesions. CONCLUSION No associations were found between the evaluated toxicities and the planning dosimetric parameters, and no differences in survival rates were detected based on previous treatment status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Murilo Kenji Kawasaki
- Department of Radiotherapy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Raphael L C Araujo
- Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil
- IEP, Barretos Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lehrer EJ, Khosla AA, Ozair A, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Lunsford LD, Mathieu D, Trudel C, Deibert CP, Malouff TD, Ruiz-Garcia H, Peterson JL, Patel S, Bonney P, Hwang L, Yu C, Zada G, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Prasad RN, Raval RR, Palmer JD, Lee CC, Yang HC, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Dickstein DR, Sheehan JP, Trifiletti DM, Ahluwalia MS. Immune checkpoint inhibition and single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: an international multicenter study of 395 patients. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:63-77. [PMID: 37889444 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04413-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Approximately 80% of brain metastases originate from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are frequently utilized in this setting. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) when SRS and ICI are administered concurrently. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted through the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Logistic regression models and competing risks analyses were utilized to identify predictors of any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN). RESULTS The study included 395 patients with 2,540 brain metastases treated with single fraction SRS and ICI across 11 institutions in four countries with a median follow-up of 14.2 months. The median age was 67 years. The median margin SRS dose was 19 Gy; 36.5% of patients had a V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3. On multivariable analysis, V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3 was a significant predictor of developing any grade RN (OR: 2.18) and SRN (OR: 3.95). At 1-year, the cumulative incidence of any grade and SRN for all patients was 4.8% and 3.8%, respectively. For concurrent and non-concurrent groups, the cumulative incidence of any grade RN was 3.8% versus 5.3%, respectively (p = 0.35); and for SRN was 3.8% vs. 3.6%, respectively (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION The risk of any grade RN and symptomatic RN following single fraction SRS and ICI for NSCLC brain metastases increases as V12 Gy exceeds 10 cm3. Concurrent ICI and SRS do not appear to increase this risk. Radiosurgical planning techniques should aim to minimize V12 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Atulya A Khosla
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Claire Trudel
- Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Phillip Bonney
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lindsay Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Cheng Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Rahul N Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ito T, Kubo K, Monzen H, Yanagi Y, Nakamura K, Sakai Y, Nishimura Y. Overcoming Problems Caused by Offset Distance of Multiple Targets in Single-isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning for Stereotactic Radiosurgery. J Med Phys 2023; 48:365-372. [PMID: 38223796 PMCID: PMC10783189 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_8_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the study is to investigate the impact of large target offset distances on the dose distribution and gamma passing rate (GPR) in single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT SRS) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a flattening filter-free (FFF) beam from a linear accelerator. Methods Two targets with a diameter of 1 cm were offset by "±2, ±4, and ±6 cm from the isocenter in a verification phantom for head SRS (20 Gy/fr). The VMAT plans were created using collimator angles that ensured the two targets did not share a leaf pair from the multi-leaf collimator. To evaluate the low-dose spread intermediate dose spill (R50%), GPRs were measured with a criterion of 3%/2 mm using an electronic portal imaging device and evaluated using monitor unit (MU), modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv), and leaf travel (LT) parameters. Results For offsets of 2, 4, and 6 cm, the respective parameters were: R50%, 4.75 ± 0.36, 5.13 ± 0.36, and 5.11 ± 0.33; GPR, 95.01%, 93.82%, and 90.67%; MU, 5893 ± 186, 5825 ± 286, and 5810 ± 396; MCSv, 0.24, 0.16, and 0.13; and LT, 189.21 ± 36.04, 327.69 ± 67.01, and 430.39 ± 114.34 mm. There was a spread in the low-dose region from offsets of ≥4 cm and the GPR negatively correlated with LT (r = -0.762). There was minimal correlation between GPR and MU or MCSv. Conclusions In SIMT SRS VMAT plans with an FFF beam from a linear accelerator, target offsets of <4 cm from the isocenter can minimize the volume of the low-dose region receiving 10 Gy or more. During treatment planning, it is important to choose gantry, couch, and collimator angles that minimize LT and thereby improve the GPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Ito
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kobe City Nishi Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuki Kubo
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hajime Monzen
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuya Yanagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakamura
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sakai
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Nishimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Demetz M, Mangesius J, Krigers A, Nevinny-Stickel M, Thomé C, Freyschlag CF, Kerschbaumer J. Tumor Location Impacts the Development of Radiation Necrosis in Benign Intracranial Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4760. [PMID: 37835452 PMCID: PMC10571857 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation necrosis (RN) is a possible late complication of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but only a few risk factors are known. The aim of this study was to assess tumor location in correlation to the development of radiation necrosis for skull base (SB) and non-skull base tumors. METHODS All patients treated with radiosurgery for benign neoplasms (2004-2020) were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical, imaging and medication data were obtained and the largest axial tumor diameter was determined using MRI scans in T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium. The diagnosis of RN was established using imaging parameters. Patients with tumors located at the skull base were compared to patients with tumors in non-skull base locations. RESULTS 205 patients could be included. Overall, 157 tumors (76.6%) were located at the SB and compared to 48 (23.4%) non-SB tumors. Among SB tumors, the most common were vestibular schwannomas (125 cases) and meningiomas (21 cases). In total, 32 (15.6%) patients developed RN after a median of 10 (IqR 5-12) months. Moreover, 62 patients (30.2%) had already undergone at least one surgical resection. In multivariate Cox regression, SB tumors showed a significantly lower risk of radiation necrosis with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.252, p < 0.001, independently of the applied radiation dose. Furthermore, higher radiation doses had a significant impact on the occurrence of RN (HR 1.372, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The risk for the development of RN for SB tumors appears to be low but should not be underestimated. No difference was found between recurrent tumors and newly diagnosed tumors, which may support the value of radiosurgical treatment for patients with recurrent SB tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Demetz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Julian Mangesius
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Aleksandrs Krigers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian F Freyschlag
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Johannes Kerschbaumer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Faccenda V, Panizza D, Pisoni V, Trivellato S, Daniotti MC, Bianchi SP, De Ponti E, Arcangeli S. Single-Isocenter Linac-Based Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases with Coplanar Arcs: A Dosimetric and Clinical Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4496. [PMID: 37760466 PMCID: PMC10526167 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of linac-based SRS/fSRS treatments using the single-isocenter coplanar FFF-VMAT technique for both single and multiple BM was investigated. Seventy patients (129 BM) treated with 15-21 Gy in 1 (n = 59) or 27 Gy in 3 (n = 11) fractions were analyzed. For each fraction, plans involving the intra-fractional errors measured by post-treatment CBCT were recalculated. The relationships of BM size, distance-to-isocenter, and barycenter shift with the difference in target coverage were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The median delivery time was 3.78 min (range, 1.83-9.25). The median post-treatment 3D error was 0.5 mm (range, 0.1-2.7) and the maximum rotational error was 0.3° (range, 0.0-1.3). In single BM patients, the GTV D95% was never reduced by >5%, whereas PTV D95% reductions >1% occurred in only 11 cases (29%). In multiple BM patients, dose deficits >5% and >1% occurred in 2 GTV (2%) and 34 PTV (37%), respectively. The differences in target coverage showed a moderate-to-strong correlation only with barycenter shift. Local failure of at least one treated BM occurred in 13 (21%) patients and the 1-year and 2-year local control rates for all lesions were 94% and 90%, respectively. The implemented workflow ensured that the degradation of target and brain dose metrics in delivered treatments was negligible. Along with encouraging clinical outcomes, these findings warrant a reduction in the PTV margins at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Faccenda
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy; (V.F.); (D.P.); (S.T.); (M.C.D.); (E.D.P.)
| | - Denis Panizza
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy; (V.F.); (D.P.); (S.T.); (M.C.D.); (E.D.P.)
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy;
| | - Valerio Pisoni
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| | - Sara Trivellato
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy; (V.F.); (D.P.); (S.T.); (M.C.D.); (E.D.P.)
| | - Martina Camilla Daniotti
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy; (V.F.); (D.P.); (S.T.); (M.C.D.); (E.D.P.)
| | - Sofia Paola Bianchi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy;
| | - Elena De Ponti
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy; (V.F.); (D.P.); (S.T.); (M.C.D.); (E.D.P.)
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy;
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy;
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chambrelant I, Jarnet D, Bou-Gharios J, Le Fèvre C, Kuntz L, Antoni D, Jenny C, Noël G. Stereotactic Radiation Therapy of Single Brain Metastases: A Literature Review of Dosimetric Studies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3937. [PMID: 37568753 PMCID: PMC10416831 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) plays a major role in treating brain metastases (BMs) and can be delivered using various equipment and techniques. This review aims to identify the dosimetric factors of each technique to determine whether one should be preferred over another for single BMs treatment. A systematic literature review on articles published between January 2015 and January 2022 was conducted using the MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases, following the PRISMA methodology, using the keywords "dosimetric comparison" and "brain metastases". The included articles compared two or more SRT techniques for treating single BM and considered at least two parameters among: conformity (CI), homogeneity (HI) and gradient (GI) indexes, delivery treatment time, and dose-volume of normal brain tissue. Eleven studies were analyzed. The heterogeneous lesions along with the different definitions of dosimetric indexes rendered the studied comparison almost unattainable. Gamma Knife (GK) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) provide better CI and GI and ensure the sparing of healthy tissue. To conclude, it is crucial to optimize dosimetric indexes to minimize radiation exposure to healthy tissue, particularly in cases of reirradiation. Consequently, there is a need for future well-designed studies to establish guidelines for selecting the appropriate SRT technique based on the treated BMs' characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Chambrelant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (I.C.); (C.L.F.); (L.K.); (D.A.)
| | - Delphine Jarnet
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Jolie Bou-Gharios
- Radiobiology Laboratory, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Clara Le Fèvre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (I.C.); (C.L.F.); (L.K.); (D.A.)
| | - Laure Kuntz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (I.C.); (C.L.F.); (L.K.); (D.A.)
| | - Delphine Antoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (I.C.); (C.L.F.); (L.K.); (D.A.)
| | - Catherine Jenny
- Department of Medical Physics, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, CEDEX 13, 75651 Paris, France;
| | - Georges Noël
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 67200 Strasbourg, France; (I.C.); (C.L.F.); (L.K.); (D.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tangsrivimol JA, Schonfeld E, Zhang M, Veeravagu A, Smith TR, Härtl R, Lawton MT, El-Sherbini AH, Prevedello DM, Glicksberg BS, Krittanawong C. Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: A State-of-the-Art Review from Past to Future. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2429. [PMID: 37510174 PMCID: PMC10378231 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a significant surge in discussions surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), along with a corresponding increase in its practical applications in various facets of everyday life, including the medical industry. Notably, even in the highly specialized realm of neurosurgery, AI has been utilized for differential diagnosis, pre-operative evaluation, and improving surgical precision. Many of these applications have begun to mitigate risks of intraoperative and postoperative complications and post-operative care. This article aims to present an overview of the principal published papers on the significant themes of tumor, spine, epilepsy, and vascular issues, wherein AI has been applied to assess its potential applications within neurosurgery. The method involved identifying high-cited seminal papers using PubMed and Google Scholar, conducting a comprehensive review of various study types, and summarizing machine learning applications to enhance understanding among clinicians for future utilization. Recent studies demonstrate that machine learning (ML) holds significant potential in neuro-oncological care, spine surgery, epilepsy management, and other neurosurgical applications. ML techniques have proven effective in tumor identification, surgical outcomes prediction, seizure outcome prediction, aneurysm prediction, and more, highlighting its broad impact and potential in improving patient management and outcomes in neurosurgery. This review will encompass the current state of research, as well as predictions for the future of AI within neurosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Tangsrivimol
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Jame Cancer Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ethan Schonfeld
- Department Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - Michael Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- Stanford Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center (CNOC), Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Roger Härtl
- Weill Cornell Medicine Brain and Spine Center, New York, NY 10022, USA
| | - Michael T Lawton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI), Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Adham H El-Sherbini
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Daniel M Prevedello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Jame Cancer Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Benjamin S Glicksberg
- Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Chayakrit Krittanawong
- Cardiology Division, New York University Langone Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Diehl CD, Giordano FA, Grosu AL, Ille S, Kahl KH, Onken J, Rieken S, Sarria GR, Shiban E, Wagner A, Beck J, Brehmer S, Ganslandt O, Hamed M, Meyer B, Münter M, Raabe A, Rohde V, Schaller K, Schilling D, Schneider M, Sperk E, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Vatter H, Combs SE. Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3670. [PMID: 37509330 PMCID: PMC10377800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Niedersachsen (CCC-N), 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Ganslandt
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Karl Schaller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Geneva Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Mannheim Cancer Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Calderon B, Vazquez L, Belkacemi M, Pourel N. Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: predictive factors of radionecrosis. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:233. [PMID: 37443046 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01178-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is a highly effective approach and represents the current standard of treatment for patients with limited number of brain metastasis (BM). SRT is generally well tolerated but can sometimes lead to radionecrosis (RN). The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of radionecrosis related to SRT for brain metastasis. METHODS This retrospective observational cohort study included patients who underwent SRT in the Institut Sainte Catherine between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2020 for the treatment of brain metastasis from any cancer. Individual data and particularly signs of radionecrosis (clinical, imaging, anatomopathological) were collected from electronic medical records. Radionecrosis was defined as the occurrence on MRI of contrast-enhancing necrotic lesions, surrounded by edema, occurring at least 6 months after SRT and localized within fields of irradiation. RESULTS 123 patients were included; median age was 66 years. 17 patients (11.8%) developed radionecrosis after a median follow up of 418.5 days [63;1498]. Predictive factors of radionecrosis in multivariate analysis were age under 66 years with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 56%. No other factor as the presence of comorbidities, the number of irradiated metastases, the PTV volume or the volume of irradiated healthy brain were predictive of radionecrosis. CONCLUSION Age at treatment initiation and tumor location seems to be correlated with radionecrosis in patients with brain metastasis treated with SRT. These elements could be useful to adapted radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoît Calderon
- Institut Sainte Catherine, 250 Chemin Des Baigne-Pieds, 84000, Avignon, France
| | - Léa Vazquez
- Institut Sainte Catherine, 250 Chemin Des Baigne-Pieds, 84000, Avignon, France.
| | | | - Nicolas Pourel
- Institut Sainte Catherine, 250 Chemin Des Baigne-Pieds, 84000, Avignon, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Beddok A, Loi M, Rivin Del Campo E, Dumas JL, Orthuon A, Créhange G, Huguet F. [Limits of dose constraint definition for organs at risk specific to stereotactic radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2023:S1278-3218(23)00067-7. [PMID: 37208260 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy is a very hypofractionated radiotherapy (>7.5Gy per fraction), and therefore is more likely to induce late toxicities than conventional normofractionated irradiations. The present study examines four frequent and potentially serious late toxicities: brain radionecrosis, radiation pneumonitis, radiation myelitis, and radiation-induced pelvic toxicities. The critical review focuses on the toxicity scales, the definition of the dose constrained volume, the dosimetric parameters, and the non-dosimetric risk factors. The most commonly used toxicity scales remain: RTOG/EORTC or common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). The definition of organ-at-risk volume requiring protection is often controversial, which limits the comparability of studies and the possibility of accurate dose constraints. Nevertheless, for the brain, whatever the indication (arteriovenous malformation, benign tumor, metastasis of solid tumors...), the association between the volume of brain receiving 12Gy (V12Gy) and the risk of cerebral radionecrosis is well established for both single and multi-fraction stereotactic irradiation. For the lung, the average dose received by both lungs and the V20 seem to correlate well with the risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis. For the spinal cord, the maximum dose is the most consensual parameter. Clinical trial protocols are useful for nonconsensual dose constraints. Non-dosimetric risk factors should be considered when validating the treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Beddok
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm, Lito U1288, 75005 Orsay, France; Service de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France.
| | - M Loi
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italie
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France; Faculté de médecine, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - J-L Dumas
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France
| | - A Orthuon
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - G Créhange
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm, Lito U1288, 75005 Orsay, France; Service de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France; Faculté de médecine, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ikawa T, Kanayama N, Arita H, Ohira S, Takano K, Hirata T, Morimoto M, Teshima T, Konishi K. Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, carries a low incidence of acute toxicities: a retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:80. [PMID: 37165431 PMCID: PMC10173492 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02262-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on acute toxicities after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and nature of toxicities immediately after SRT using a linear accelerator. METHODS This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 315 patients with brain metastases treated with SRT at our institution between May 2019 and February 2022. In total, 439 SRT sessions were performed for 2161 brain metastases. The outcome of interest was immediate side effects (ISEs), defined as new or worsening symptoms occurring during SRT or within 14 days after the end of SRT. RESULTS Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 ISEs occurred in 16 (3.6%) and 7 (1.6%) cases, respectively. Among 63 treatments for 10 or more lesions (range: 10-40), 1 (1.6%) ISE occurred. Among 22 treatments for lesions with a maximum tumor volume of > 10 cc, 2 (9.1%) ISEs occurred. Grade ≥ 3 ISEs included 1, 4, 1, and 1 cases of grade 3 nausea, grade 3 new-onset partial and generalized seizures, grade 3 obstructive hydrocephalus, and grade 5 intracranial hemorrhage, respectively. ISEs were more common in patients with a larger maximum tumor volume, primary sites other than lung and breast cancer, and pre-treatment neurological symptoms. CONCLUSION SRT using a linear accelerator for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, is safe, with a low incidence of ISEs. Serious complications immediately after SRT are rare but possible; therefore, careful follow-up is necessary after treatment initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Arita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shingo Ohira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Takano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takero Hirata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Morimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tijtgat J, Calliauw E, Dirven I, Vounckx M, Kamel R, Vanbinst AM, Everaert H, Seynaeve L, Van Den Berge D, Duerinck J, Neyns B. Low-Dose Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Focal Radiation Necrosis of the Brain (fRNB): A Single-Center Case Series. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092560. [PMID: 37174026 PMCID: PMC10177060 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Focal radiation necrosis of the brain (fRNB) is a late adverse event that can occur following the treatment of benign or malignant brain lesions with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Recent studies have shown that the incidence of fRNB is higher in cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. The use of bevacizumab (BEV), a monoclonal antibody that targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is an effective treatment for fRNB when given at a dose of 5-7.5 mg/kg every two weeks. In this single-center retrospective case series, we investigated the effectiveness of a low-dose regimen of BEV (400 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg every 4 weeks) in patients diagnosed with fRNB. A total of 13 patients were included in the study; twelve of them experienced improvement in their existing clinical symptoms, and all patients had a decrease in the volume of edema on MRI scans. No clinically significant treatment-related adverse effects were observed. Our preliminary findings suggest that this fixed low-dose regimen of BEV can be a well-tolerated and cost-effective alternative treatment option for patients diagnosed with fRNB, and it is deserving of further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Tijtgat
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Evan Calliauw
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iris Dirven
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manon Vounckx
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Randa Kamel
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Marie Vanbinst
- Department of Medical Imaging, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hendrik Everaert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laura Seynaeve
- Department of Neurology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Den Berge
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Johnny Duerinck
- Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Vaios EJ, Winter SF, Shih HA, Dietrich J, Peters KB, Floyd SR, Kirkpatrick JP, Reitman ZJ. Novel Mechanisms and Future Opportunities for the Management of Radiation Necrosis in Patients Treated for Brain Metastases in the Era of Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2432. [PMID: 37173897 PMCID: PMC10177360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation necrosis, also known as treatment-induced necrosis, has emerged as an important adverse effect following stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) for brain metastases. The improved survival of patients with brain metastases and increased use of combined systemic therapy and SRS have contributed to a growing incidence of necrosis. The cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway (cGAS-STING) represents a key biological mechanism linking radiation-induced DNA damage to pro-inflammatory effects and innate immunity. By recognizing cytosolic double-stranded DNA, cGAS induces a signaling cascade that results in the upregulation of type 1 interferons and dendritic cell activation. This pathway could play a key role in the pathogenesis of necrosis and provides attractive targets for therapeutic development. Immunotherapy and other novel systemic agents may potentiate activation of cGAS-STING signaling following radiotherapy and increase necrosis risk. Advancements in dosimetric strategies, novel imaging modalities, artificial intelligence, and circulating biomarkers could improve the management of necrosis. This review provides new insights into the pathophysiology of necrosis and synthesizes our current understanding regarding the diagnosis, risk factors, and management options of necrosis while highlighting novel avenues for discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene J. Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Sebastian F. Winter
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Helen A. Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Katherine B. Peters
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Zachary J. Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Matsui JK, Perlow HK, Upadhyay R, McCalla A, Raval RR, Thomas EM, Blakaj DM, Beyer SJ, Palmer JD. Advances in Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:569-586. [PMID: 37182993 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone treatment of brain metastases. With new treatment advances, patients with brain metastases are living longer, and finding solutions for mitigating treatment-related neurotoxicity and improving quality of life is important. Historically, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was widely used but treatment options such as hippocampal sparing WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have emerged as promising alternatives. Herein, we discuss the recent advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases including the sparing of critical structures that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcomes (eg, hippocampus, fornix) that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcome, evidence supporting preoperative and fractionated-SRS, and treatment strategies for managing radiation necrosis.
Collapse
|
37
|
Thomson HM, Fortin Ensign SP, Edmonds VS, Sharma A, Butterfield RJ, Schild SE, Ashman JB, Zimmerman RS, Patel NP, Bryce AH, Vora SA, Sio TT, Porter AB. Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Related Radiation
Necrosis in Patients with Intracranial Metastasis from Melanoma. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2023; 17:11795549231161878. [PMID: 36968334 PMCID: PMC10034291 DOI: 10.1177/11795549231161878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiation necrosis (RN) is a clinically relevant complication of stereotactic
radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial metastasis (ICM) treatments. Radiation
necrosis development is variable following SRS. It remains unclear if risk
factors for and clinical outcomes following RN may be different for melanoma
patients. We reviewed patients with ICM from metastatic melanoma to
understand the potential impact of RN in this patient population. Methods: Patients who received SRS for ICM from melanoma at Mayo Clinic Arizona
between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included
demographics, tumor characteristics, radiation parameters, prior surgical
and systemic treatments, and patient outcomes. Radiation necrosis was
diagnosed by clinical evaluation including brain magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) and, in some cases, tissue evaluation. Results: Radiation necrosis was diagnosed in 7 (27%) of 26 patients at 1.6 to 38
months following initial SRS. Almost 92% of all patients received systemic
therapy and 35% had surgical resection prior to SRS. Patients with RN
trended toward having larger ICM and a prior history of surgical resection,
although statistical significance was not reached. Among patients with
resection, those who developed RN had a longer period between surgery and
SRS start (mean 44 vs 33 days). Clinical improvement following treatment for
RN was noted in 2 (29%) patients. Conclusions: Radiation necrosis is relatively common following SRS for treatment of ICM
from metastatic melanoma and clinical outcomes are poor. Further studies
aimed at mitigating RN development and identifying novel approaches for
treatment are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly M Thomson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Akanksha Sharma
- Department of Neurology, Pacific
Neurosciences Institute and John Wayne Cancer Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | | | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Naresh P Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alan H Bryce
- Department of Hematology and Oncology,
Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sujay A Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Hematology and Oncology,
Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Neurology, College of
Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Alyx B Porter, Department of Neurology,
College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Leu J, Akerman M, Mendez C, Lischalk JW, Carpenter T, Ebling D, Haas JA, Witten M, Barbaro M, Duic P, Tessler L, Repka MC. Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1132777. [PMID: 37091181 PMCID: PMC10113671 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionBrain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor diagnosed in adults. In patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the incidence of post-treatment radionecrosis appears to be rising, which has been attributed to improved patient survival as well as novel systemic treatments. The impacts of concomitant immunotherapy and the interval between diagnosis and treatment on patient outcomes are unclear.MethodsThis single institution, retrospective study consisted of patients who received single or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for intact brain metastases. Exclusion criteria included neurosurgical resection prior to treatment and treatment of non-malignant histologies or primary central nervous system malignancies. A univariate screen was implemented to determine which factors were associated with radionecrosis. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the two groups for categorical variables, and the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous data. Those factors that appeared to be associated with radionecrosis on univariate analyses were included in a multivariable model. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess potential predictors of time to local failure and time to regional failure.ResultsA total of 107 evaluable patients with a total of 256 individual brain metastases were identified. The majority of metastases were non-small cell lung cancer (58.98%), followed by breast cancer (16.02%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated increased risk of radionecrosis with increasing MRI maximum axial dimension (OR 1.10, p=0.0123) and a history of previous whole brain radiation therapy (OR 3.48, p=0.0243). Receipt of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of local failure (HR 0.31, p=0.0159). Time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, and concurrent immunotherapy had no impact on incidence of radionecrosis or regional failure.DiscussionAn optimal time interval between diagnosis and treatment for intact brain metastases that minimizes radionecrosis and maximizes local and regional control could not be identified. Concurrent immunotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of radionecrosis and may improve local control. These data further support the safety and synergistic efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Leu
- Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States
| | - Meredith Akerman
- Division of Health Services Research, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Christopher Mendez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
- NYCyberKnife at Perlmutter Cancer Center – Manhattan, New York, NY, United States
| | - Todd Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - David Ebling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan A. Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
- NYCyberKnife at Perlmutter Cancer Center – Manhattan, New York, NY, United States
| | - Matthew Witten
- Department of Medical Physics, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Marissa Barbaro
- Department of Neurology, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Paul Duic
- Department of Neurology, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Lee Tessler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Michael C. Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- *Correspondence: Michael C. Repka,
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lolli J, Tessari F, Berti F, Fusella M, Fiorentin D, Bimbatti D, Basso U, Busato F. Impressive reduction of brain metastasis radionecrosis after cabozantinib therapy in metastatic renal carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1136300. [PMID: 36959812 PMCID: PMC10028179 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1136300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radionecrosis is a consequence of SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery) for brain metastases in 34% of cases, and if symptomatic (8%-16%), it requires therapy with corticosteroids and bevacizumab and, less frequently, surgery. Oncological indications are increasing and appropriate stereotactic adapted LINACs (linear accelerators) are becoming more widely available worldwide. Efforts are being made to treat brain radionecrosis in order to relieve symptoms and spare the use of active therapies. Case presentation Herein, we describe a 65-year-old female patient presenting with brain radionecrosis 6 months after stereotactic radiotherapy for two brain metastatic lesions. Being symptomatic with headache and slow cognitive-motor function, the patient received corticosteroids. Because of later lung progression, the patient took cabozantinib. An impressive reduction of the two brain radionecrosis areas was seen at the brain MRI 2 months after the initiation of the angiogenic drug. Discussion The high incidence of radionecrosis (2/2 treated lesions) can be interpreted by the combination of SRS and previous ipilimumab that is associated with increased risk of radionecrosis. The molecular mechanisms of brain radionecrosis, and its exact duration in time, are poorly understood. We hypothesize that the antiangiogenic effect of cabozantinib may have had a strong effect in reducing brain radionecrosis areas. Conclusion In this clinical case, cabozantinib is associated with a fast and significant volume reduction of brain radionecrosis appearing after SRS and concomitant immunotherapy. This drug seems to show, like bevacizumab, clinical implications not only for its efficacy in systemic disease control but also in reducing brain radionecrosis. More research is needed to evaluate all molecular mechanisms of brain radionecrosis and their interaction with systemic therapies like third-generation TKIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Lolli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesca Tessari
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Franco Berti
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Fusella
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Davide Fiorentin
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Davide Bimbatti
- Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| | - Umberto Basso
- Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabio Busato
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Management of initial and recurrent radiation-induced contrast enhancements following radiotherapy for brain metastases: Clinical and radiological impact of bevacizumab and corticosteroids. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100600. [PMID: 36873269 PMCID: PMC9975203 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The appearance of radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) after radiotherapy for brain metastases can go along with severe neurological impairments. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate radiological changes, the course and recurrence of RICE and identify associated prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with brain metastases, who were treated with radiotherapy and subsequently developed RICE. Patient demographic and clinical data, radiation-, cancer-, and RICE-treatment, radiological results, and oncological outcomes were reviewed in detail. Results A total of 95 patients with a median follow-up of 28.8 months were identified. RICE appeared after a median time of 8.0 months after first radiotherapy and 6.4 months after re-irradiation. Bevacizumab in combination with corticosteroids achieved an improvement of clinical symptoms and imaging features in 65.9% and 75.6% of cases, respectively, both significantly superior compared to treatment with corticosteroids only, and further significantly prolonged RICE-progression-free survival to a median of 5.6 months. Recurrence of RICE after initially improved or stable imaging occurred in 63.1% of cases, significantly more often in patients after re-irradiation and was associated with high mortality of 36.6% after the diagnosis of flare-up. Response of recurrence significantly depended on the applied treatment and multiple courses of bevacizumab achieved good response. Conclusion Our results suggest that bevacizumab in combination with corticosteroids is superior in achieving short-term imaging and symptom improvement of RICE and prolongs the progression-free time compared to corticosteroids alone. Long-term RICE flare-up rates after bevacizumab discontinuation are high, but repeated treatments achieved effective symptomatic control.
Collapse
|
41
|
Nardone V, Romeo C, D'Ippolito E, Pastina P, D'Apolito M, Pirtoli L, Caraglia M, Mutti L, Bianco G, Falzea AC, Giannicola R, Giordano A, Tagliaferri P, Vinciguerra C, Desideri I, Loi M, Reginelli A, Cappabianca S, Tassone P, Correale P. The role of brain radiotherapy for EGFR- and ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a review. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:316-329. [PMID: 36786970 PMCID: PMC10020247 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01602-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is frequently complicated by central nervous system (CNS) metastases affecting patients' life expectancy and quality. At the present clinical trials including neurosurgery, radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments alone or in combination have provided controversial results. CNS involvement is even more frequent in NSCLC patients with EGFR activating mutations or ALK rearrangement suggesting a role of target therapy in the upfront treatment in place of loco-regionals treatments (i.e. RT and/or surgery). So far clinical research has not explored the potential role of accurate brain imaging (i.e. MRI instead of the routine total-body contrast CT and/or PET/CT staging) to identify patients that could benefit of local therapies. Moreover, for patients who require concomitant RT there are no clear guidelines on the timing of intervention with respect to innovative precision medicine approaches with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, ALK-inhibitors and/or immuno-oncological therapies. On this basis the present review describes the therapeutic strategies integrating medical and radiation oncology in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) adenocarcinoma with CNS involvement and EGFR activating mutations or ALK rearrangement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | - Caterina Romeo
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli" Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Emma D'Ippolito
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Maria D'Apolito
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli" Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Luigi Pirtoli
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Michele Caraglia
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Luciano Mutti
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Giovanna Bianco
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli" Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Antonella Consuelo Falzea
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli" Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Rocco Giannicola
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli" Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Antonio Giordano
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
- Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | - Pierosandro Tagliaferri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Græcia University, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Tassone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Græcia University, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Correale
- Medical Oncology Unit, "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli" Grand Metropolitan Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center of Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lai J, Liu S, Liu J, Li X, Chen J, Jia Y, Lei K, Zhou L. Clinical Feasibility of Using Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Combined with Non-coplanar Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Five or Fewer Multiple Intracranial Metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:408-416. [PMID: 37002009 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the clinical feasibility of single-isocentre non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT) with non-coplanar cone beam computed tomography (NC-CBCT) in hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for five or fewer multiple brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten patients with multiple brain metastases who underwent single-isocentre NC-VMAT HSRT with limited couch rotations (within ±45°) and NC-CBCT with a limited scanning range (150-200°) were included in the current analysis. Conventional single-isocentre coplanar VMAT (C-VMAT) plans were generated and compared with NC-VMAT plans. The intracranial response and toxicities of single-isocentre NC-VMAT HSRT were also evaluated. RESULTS Compared with C-VMAT, NC-VMAT generated better target conformity (P < 0.05), a lower gradient index (P < 0.05) and better normal brain tissue sparing, especially for volume ≥12 Gy, with a median reduction of 12.65 cm3. For 45° couch rotation, NC-CBCT produced sufficient image quality to differentiate bony anatomy, even with a 150° scanning range, which could be successfully used for patient set-up correction. After NC-CBCT, 57.1% of the measured non-coplanar set-up errors exceeded the threshold value. The median gamma passing rate of NC-VMAT was higher than that of C-VMAT plans (P < 0.05). The non-coplanar beam of NC-VMAT with NC-CBCT corrections exhibited superior gamma passing rate to that without NC-CBCT corrections. The intracranial objective response rate and disease control rate for all patients were 80% (8/10) and 100% (10/10), respectively, and the most common toxicities were headache (20%) and dizziness (20%). CONCLUSION NC-VMAT with limited couch rotation (within ±45°) combined with NC-CBCT with a limited scanning range (150-200°) markedly improves the plan quality and set-up accuracy in single-isocentre multiple-target HSRT.
Collapse
|
43
|
A Deep Learning-Based Computer Aided Detection (CAD) System for Difficult-to-Detect Brain Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:779-793. [PMID: 36289038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to develop a computer-aided detection (CAD) system that optimally augments human performance, excelling especially at identifying small inconspicuous brain metastases (BMs), by training a convolutional neural network on a unique magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data set containing subtle BMs that were not detected prospectively during routine clinical care. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for BMs at our institution from 2016 to 2018 without prior brain-directed therapy or small cell histology were eligible. For patients who underwent 2 consecutive courses of SRS, treatment planning MRIs from their initial course were reviewed for radiographic evidence of an emerging metastasis at the same location as metastases treated in their second SRS course. If present, these previously unidentified lesions were contoured and categorized as retrospectively identified metastases (RIMs). RIMs were further subcategorized according to whether they did (+DC) or did not (-DC) meet diagnostic imaging-based criteria to definitively classify them as metastases based upon their appearance in the initial MRI alone. Prospectively identified metastases (PIMs) from these patients, and from patients who only underwent a single course of SRS, were also included. An open-source convolutional neural network architecture was adapted and trained to detect both RIMs and PIMs on thin-slice, contrast-enhanced, spoiled gradient echo MRIs. Patients were randomized into 5 groups: 4 for training/cross-validation and 1 for testing. RESULTS One hundred thirty-five patients with 563 metastases, including 72 RIMS, met criteria. For the test group, CAD sensitivity was 94% for PIMs, 80% for +DC RIMs, and 79% for PIMs and +DC RIMs with diameter <3 mm, with a median of 2 false positives per patient and a Dice coefficient of 0.79. CONCLUSIONS Our CAD model, trained on a novel data set and using a single common MR sequence, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity overall, outperforming published CAD results for small metastases and RIMs - the lesion types most in need of human performance augmentation.
Collapse
|
44
|
Comparison between the HyperArc™ technique and the CyberKnife® technique for stereotactic treatment of brain metastases. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:136-144. [PMID: 36797159 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the planimetric capacities between HyperArc™-based stereotactic radiosurgery and robotic radiosurgery system-based planning using CyberKnife® M6 for single and multiple cranial metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated 51 treatment plans for cranial metastases, including 30 patients with a single lesion and 21 patients with multiple lesions, treated with the CyberKnife® M6. These treatment plans were optimized using the HyperArc™ (HA) system with the TrueBeam. The comparison of the quality of the treatment plans between the two treatment techniques (CyberKnife and HyperArc) was performed using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Dosimetric parameters were compared for target volumes and organs at risk. RESULTS Coverage of the target volumes was equivalent between the two techniques, whereas median Paddick conformity index and median gradient index for all target volumes were 0.9 and 3.4, respectively for HyperArc plans, and 0.8 and 4.5 for CyberKnife plans (P<0.001). The median dose of gross tumor volume (GTV) for HyperArc and CyberKnife plans were 28.4 and 28.8, respectively. Total brain V18Gy and V12Gy-GTVs were 11cm3 and 20.2cm3 for HyperArc plans versus 18cm3 and 34.1cm3 for CyberKnife plans (P<0.001). CONCLUSION The HyperArc provided better brain sparing, with a significant reduction in V12Gy and V18Gy, associated with a lower gradient index, whereas the CyberKnife gave a higher median GTV dose. The HyperArc technique seems to be more appropriate for multiple cranial metastases and for large single metastatic lesions.
Collapse
|
45
|
Scorsetti M, Navarria P, Cozzi L, Clerici E, Bellu L, Franceschini D, Marzo AM, Franzese C, Torri V, Reggiori G, Lobefalo F, Raspagliesi L, Attuati L, Pessina F, Franzini A, Picozzi P, Tomatis S. Radiosurgery of limited brain metastases from primary solid tumor: results of the randomized phase III trial (NCT02355613) comparing treatments executed with a specialized or a C-arm linac-based platform. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:28. [PMID: 36750848 PMCID: PMC9906937 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02216-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparative prospective data regarding different radiosurgery (SRS) modalities for treating brain metastases (BMs) from solid tumors are not available. To investigate with a single institute phase III randomized trial whether SRS executed with linac (Arm-B) is superior to a dedicated multi-source gamma-ray stereotactic platform (Arm-A). METHODS Adults patients with 1-4 BMs from solid tumors up to 30 mm in maximum diameter were randomly assigned to arms A and B. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2-3) radionecrosis (CIRN). Secondary endpoints were local progression cumulative incidence (CILP), distant brain failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 251 patients were randomly assigned to Arm-A (121) or Arm-B (130). The 1-year RN cumulative incidence was 6.7% in whole cohort, 3.8% (95% CI 1.9-7.4%) in Arm-B, and 9.3% (95% CI 6.2-13.8%) in the Arm-A (p = 0.43). CIRN was influenced by target volume irradiated only for the Arm-A (p << 0.001; HR 1.36 [95% CI 1.25-1.48]). Symptomatic RN occurred in 56 cases at a median time of 10.3 months (range 1.15-54.8 months), 27 in the Arm-B at a median time of 15.9 months (range 4.9-54.8 months), and 29 in the Arm-A at a median time of 6.9 months (1.2-32.3 months), without statistically significant differences between the two arms. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two arms in CILP, BDF, DFS or OS. The mean beam-on time to deliver SRS was 49.0 ± 36.2 min in Arm-A, and 3.1 ± 1.6 min in Arm-B. CONCLUSIONS Given the technical differences between the treatment platforms investigated in this single-institution study, linac-based SRS (Arm-B) did not lead to significantly lower grade 2-3 RN rates versus the multi-source gamma-ray system (Arm-A) in a population of patients with limited brain metastases of small volume. No significant difference in local control was observed between both arms. For Arm-B, the treatment delivery time was significantly lower than for Arm-A. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02355613.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Scorsetti
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy ,grid.452490.eDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Luca Cozzi
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy ,grid.452490.eDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Luisa Bellu
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Antonio Marco Marzo
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy ,grid.452490.eDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan Italy
| | - Valter Torri
- grid.4527.40000000106678902Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Francesca Lobefalo
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Luca Raspagliesi
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Neurosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Neurosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Federico Pessina
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy ,grid.452490.eDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Neurosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Piero Picozzi
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Neurosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Re-Irradiation by Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Brain Metastases in the Case of Local Recurrence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030996. [PMID: 36765953 PMCID: PMC9913463 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a second course of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT2) treatment for a local recurrence of brain metastases previously treated with SRT (SRT1), using the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) reporting standards and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines. METHODS From December 2014 to May 2021, 32 patients with 34 brain metastases received salvage SRT2 after failed SRT1. A total dose of 21 to 27 Gy in 3 fractions or 30 Gy in 5 fractions was prescribed to the periphery of the PTV (99% of the prescribed dose covering 99% of the PTV). After SRT2, multiparametric MRI, sometimes combined with 18F-DOPA PET-CT, was performed every 3 months to determine local control (LC) and radionecrosis (RN). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 12 months (range: 1-37 months), the crude LC and RN rates were 68% and 12%, respectively, and the median overall survival was 25 months. In a multivariate analysis, the performance of surgery was predictive of a significantly better LC (p = 0.002) and survival benefit (p = 0.04). The volume of a normal brain receiving 5 Gy during SRT2 (p = 0.04), a dose delivered to the PTV in SRT1 (p = 0.003), and concomitant systemic therapy (p = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of RN. CONCLUSION SRT2 is an effective approach for the local recurrence of BM after initial SRT treatment and is a potential salvage therapy option for well-selected people with a good performance status. Surgery was associated with a higher LC.
Collapse
|
47
|
Ahamed S, Singh N, Suryadevara A, Suvarna P. Monitor unit restrained hybrid approach using conformal arcs for radiosurgery of solitary brain metastasis. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.110817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
48
|
Dosimetric Impact of Lesion Number, Size, and Volume on Mean Brain Dose with Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030780. [PMID: 36765738 PMCID: PMC9913147 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the effect of lesion number and volume for brain metastasis treated with SRS using GammaKnife® ICON™ (GK) and CyberKnife® M6™ (CK). Four sets of lesion sizes (<5 mm, 5-10 mm, >10-15 mm, and >15 mm) were contoured and prescribed a dose of 20 Gy/1 fraction. The number of lesions was increased until a threshold mean brain dose of 8 Gy was reached; then individually optimized to achieve maximum conformity. Across GK plans, mean brain dose was linearly proportional to the number of lesions and total GTV for all sizes. The numbers of lesions needed to reach this threshold for GK were 177, 57, 29, and 10 for each size group, respectively; corresponding total GTVs were 3.62 cc, 20.37 cc, 30.25 cc, and 57.96 cc, respectively. For CK, the threshold numbers of lesions were 135, 35, 18, and 8, with corresponding total GTVs of 2.32 cc, 12.09 cc, 18.24 cc, and 41.52 cc respectively. Mean brain dose increased linearly with number of lesions and total GTV while V8 Gy, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy showed quadratic correlations to the number of lesions and total GTV. Modern dedicated intracranial SRS systems allow for treatment of numerous brain metastases especially for ≤10 mm; clinical evidence to support this practice is critical to expansion in the clinic.
Collapse
|
49
|
Lehrer EJ, Kowalchuk RO, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Lunsford LD, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Mathieu D, Trudel C, Malouff TD, Ruiz-Garcia H, Bonney P, Hwang L, Yu C, Zada G, Patel S, Deibert CP, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Prasad RN, Raval RR, Palmer JD, Lee CC, Yang HC, Harmsen WS, Jones BM, Sharma S, Ahluwalia MS, Sheehan JP, Trifiletti DM. Concurrent Administration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases is Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Radiation Necrosis Over Nonconcurrent Treatment: An International Multicenter Study of 657 Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00057-3. [PMID: 36690161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are highly effective treatments for brain metastases, particularly when these therapies are administered concurrently. However, there are limited data reporting the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) in this setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with brain metastases from primary non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma treated with SRS and ICI were considered. Time-to-event analyses were conducted for any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN) with death incorporated as a competing risk. As a secondary analysis, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used for model development, and a loop of potential models was analyzed, with the highest-fidelity model selected. Brain V12 Gy thresholds identified on RPA were then incorporated into the competing risks analysis. Concurrent SRS and ICI administration. RESULTS Six hundred fifty-seven patients with 4182 brain metastases across 11 international institutions were analyzed. The median follow-up for all patients was 13.4 months. The median follow-up was 12.8 months and 14.1 months for the concurrent and nonconcurrent groups, respectively (P = .03). The median patient age was 66 years, and the median Karnofsky Performance Status was 90. In patients with any grade RN, 1- and 2-year rates were 6.4% and 9.9%, respectively. In patients with SRN, 1- and 2-year rates were 4.8% and 7.2%, respectively. On RPA, the highest-fidelity models consistently identified V12 Gy as the dominant variable predictive of RN. Three risk groups were identified by V12 Gy: (1) < 12 cm3; (2) 20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3; (3) V12 Gy > 20 cm3. In patients with any grade RN, 1-year rates were 3.7% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 10.3% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 12.6% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3); the 2-year rates were 7.5% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 13.8% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 15.4% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3) (P < 0.001). In patients with any SRN, 1-year rates were 2.4% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 8.9% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 10.3% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3); the 2-year rates were 4.4% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 12.4% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 13.1% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3; P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of any grade RN or SRN when accounting for therapy timing for all patients and by V12 risk group identified on RPA. CONCLUSIONS The use of SRS and ICI results in a low risk of any grade RN and SRN. This risk is not increased with concurrent administration. Therefore, ICI can safely be administered within 4-weeks of SRS. Three risk groups based on V12 Gy were identified, which clinicians may consider to further reduce rates of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Roman O Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minneapolis
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claire Trudel
- Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada
| | - Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Phillip Bonney
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lindsay Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Cheng Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Rahul N Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan
| | | | - Brianna M Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Admojo L, Korte J, Anderson N, Phillips C, Caspersz L, Lasocki A. Investigating the role of delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate radiation necrosis from tumour recurrence in brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:292-298. [PMID: 36650724 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of radionecrosis (RN) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to brain metastases is increasing. An overlap in the conventional MRI appearances of RN and tumour recurrence (TR) is diagnostically challenging. Delayed contrast MRI compares contrast enhancement over two time periods to create treatment response assessment maps (TRAMs). We aim to assess the utility of TRAMs in brain metastases patients. METHODS Delayed contrast MRI scans were performed on ten brain metastases patients, previously treated with SRS, who developed equivocal lesion(s) on routine MRI follow-up. T1-weighted images were obtained five minutes and 60-75 min after contrast injection, followed by Brain Lab software analysis to create TRAMs. TRAMs patterns were then compared with the patient's clinical status, subsequent imaging, and histology results. RESULTS We identified three regions on TRAMs: central, peripheral, and surrounding. Each region could be described either as contrast accumulation (red colour and representing non-tumour tissue) or contrast clearance (blue colour and representing tumour tissue). Our analysis demonstrated similarities in the TRAMs pattern between TR and RN, though to varying degrees. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the TRAMs appearances of RN and TR overlap. Our findings suggest that the previously-described correlation between contrast clearance and TR is at least partially attributable to more solid initial enhancement, rather than convincingly a difference in the underlying tissue properties, and the additional diagnostic value of TRAMs may be limited. Thus, further research on TRAMs is necessary prior to incorporating it into routine clinical management after SRS for brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenztino Admojo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Korte
- Department of Physical Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel Anderson
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claire Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren Caspersz
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arian Lasocki
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|