American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guideline for the performance of stereotactic body radiation therapy

Analysis of intra-fractional positioning correction performed by cone beam computed tomography in SBRT treatments

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the positioning correction extracted from Intra-fraction Cone Beam (IF-CBCT) images obtained during Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments, and to assess whether its magnitude justifies its acquisition. In addition, the results obtained in lung, liver, and pancreas SBRTs with two deep inspiration breath-hold systems (DIBH), and for prostate with/without ultrasound (US) monitoring were compared.

METHODS

1449 treatments, performed with two linear accelerators (LINACs) were retrospectively analyzed. DIBH were performed either with a spirometry-based device or a surface-guidance system and one LINAC was equipped with US monitoring system for prostate. Significance tests were used to account for differences between units.

RESULTS

Group systematic error (M) was approximately -0.7 mm for DIBH treatments in superior-inferior (SI) direction with no difference (p > 0.7) between LINACs. Moreover, there was a SI difference of 0.5 mm for prostate treatments (p = 0.008), in favor of the US monitored one. In anterior-posterior (AP) direction, only liver treatments exhibited differences between LINACs, with the spirometer-based system being 0.8 mm inferior (p = 0.003). M<0.4 mm in left-right (LR) direction was found for all locations and LINACs. The spirometer-based system resulted in lower standard deviation of systematic and random errors in most components and locations, with a greater effect observed in liver SBRTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The corrections made with IF-CBCT during SBRT treatments were not negligible. Both DIBH systems were effective in managing respiratory movements. However, the spirometry-based system was slightly more accurate. In addition, US monitoring of the prostate appeared to be useful in reducing target shift.

[New Radiation Therapy Concepts in Non-Metastatic Lung Cancer]

Radiotherapy plays a critical role in the management of non-metastatic lung cancer, offering curative potential and symptom relief. It serves as a primary treatment modality or adjuvant therapy post-surgery, enhancing local control and survival rates. Modern techniques like Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) enable precise tumor targeting, minimizing damage to healthy tissue and reducing treatment duration. The synergy between radiotherapy and systemic treatments, including immunotherapy, holds promise in improving outcomes. Immunotherapy augments the immune response against cancer cells, potentially enhancing radiotherapy's efficacy. Furthermore, radiotherapy's ability to modulate the tumor microenvironment complements the immunotherapy's mechanism of action. As a result, the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy may offer superior tumor control and survival benefits. Moreover, the integration of radiotherapy with surgery and chemotherapy in multidisciplinary approaches maximizes treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Herein we present an overview on modern radiotherapy and potential developments in the close future.

NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group Patterns of Practice Survey and Consensus Recommendations on Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionation using pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PBSPT) is an attractive option for thoracic malignancies. Combining the advantages of target coverage conformity and critical organ sparing from both PBSPT and SBRT, this new delivery technique has great potential to improve the therapeutic ratio, particularly for tumors near critical organs. Safe and effective implementation of PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation to treat thoracic malignancies is more challenging than the conventionally fractionated PBSPT because of concerns of amplified uncertainties at the larger dose per fraction. The NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Thoracic Subcommittee surveyed proton centers in the United States to identify practice patterns of thoracic PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation. From these patterns, we present recommendations for future technical development of proton SBRT/hypofractionation for thoracic treatment. Among other points, the recommendations highlight the need for volumetric image guidance and multiple computed tomography-based robust optimization and robustness tools to minimize further the effect of uncertainties associated with respiratory motion. Advances in direct motion analysis techniques are urgently needed to supplement current motion management techniques.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Is More Better?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its advanced stage upon diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgical resection, the primary curative approach, often results in poor long-term survival rates, leading to the exploration of alternative strategies like neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). While NAT aims to enhance resectability and overall survival, there appears to be potential for improvement, prompting consideration of alternative neoadjuvant strategies integrating full-dose chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in TNT approaches. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery, potentially improving margin-negative resection rates and enabling curative resection for locally advanced cases. The lingering question: is more always better? This article categorizes TNT strategies into six main groups based on radiotherapy (RT) techniques: (1) conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), (2) the Dutch PREOPANC approach, (3) hypofractionated ablative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HFA-IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques, which further divide into (4) non-ablative SBRT, (5) nearly ablative SBRT, and (6) adaptive ablative SBRT. A comprehensive analysis of the literature on TNT is provided for both borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), with detailed sections for each.

Invasive Nodal Staging via Endobronchial Ultrasound and Outcome in Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - Results from a Single Institution Study

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prognostic value of invasive nodal staging (INS) for patients undergoing SRBT has not been studied extensively. Herein, we report the impact of INS in addition to 18F-FDG-PET on treatment outcome for patients with NSCLC undergoing SBRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage I/ II NSCLC who underwent SBRT were included with IRB approval. Clinical, dosimetric, and radiological data were obtained. Overall survival (OS), regional recurrence free survival (RRFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) were analyzed using Kaplan Meyer method. Univariable analysis (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed to assess the relationship between the variables and the outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 376 patients were included in the analysis. Median follow up was 43 months (IQ 32.6-45.8). Median OS, LRFS, RRFS, DRFS were 40, 32, 32, 33 months, respectively. The 5-year local, regional, and distant failure rates were 13.4%, 23.5% and 25.3%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS were 83.8%, 55.6%, and 36.3%, respectively. On MVA, INS was not a predictor of either improved overall or any recurrence free survival endpoints while larger tumor size, age, and adjusted Charleston co-morbidity index (aCCI) were significant for inferior LRFS, RRFS, and DRFS.

CONCLUSION

Invasive nodal staging did not improve overall or recurrence free survival among patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT whereas older age, aCCI, and larger tumor size were significant predictors of LRFS, RRFS, and DRFS.

Second Chance for Cure: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Disease

PURPOSE

Local ablative therapy, such as radiotherapy or surgery, plays a key role in treatment of patients with oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) comes to the fore as a safe and effective treatment for patients with a limited number of metastases, even those located in hard-to-reach body sites. Many researchers have suggested that metastatsis-directed therapy could improve long-term progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with oligometastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study conducted between July 2015 and February 2022. In our institute, 60 patients with controlled primary tumors and one to five metastases were treated with SABR. Prescribed radiation doses ranged from 12 to 60 Gy administered in one to seven fractions. We aimed to determine whether metastatic-directed therapy using SABR for all oligometastases affects OS and PFS and whether the primary tumor or metastatic site influences OS/PFS.

RESULTS

The most common primary malignancy types were prostate (n = 14), colorectal (n = 10), lung (n = 7), and breast cancers (n = 6). The median follow-up was 30 months, ranging from 9 to 79. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS and OS rates were 54.9%, 37.0%, and 37.0% and 98.3%, 84.4%, and 73.8%, respectively, and the median time to first progression was 15 (range, 2-32) months. Twenty-four (40%) patients had no recurrence. In our analysis, primary tumor site was not an independent prognostic factor. The metastatic site may influence on patient outcome in cases of localized bone and liver metastases.

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective analysis, SABR was associated with favorable levels of PFS and OS in patients with oligometastases. The limitations of our study were lacking high-level evidence, and randomized studies to compare SABR and palliative standard of care are mandatory.

Imaging Considerations before and after Liver-Directed Locoregional Treatments for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Liver metastases will develop in over one-third of patients with colorectal cancer and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Even though surgical resection has been considered the mainstay of treatment, only approximately 20% of the patients are surgical candidates. Liver-directed locoregional therapies such as thermal ablation, Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization, and stereotactic body radiation therapy are pivotal in managing colorectal liver metastatic disease. Comprehensive pre- and post-intervention imaging, encompassing both anatomic and metabolic assessments, is invaluable for precise treatment planning, staging, treatment response assessment, and the prompt identification of local or distant tumor progression. This review outlines the value of imaging for colorectal liver metastatic disease and offers insights into imaging follow-up after locoregional liver-directed therapy.

An optimal method of hydrogel spacer insertion for stereotactic body radiation therapy of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore an ideal method for hydrogel spacer insertion by analyzing the efficacy and safety of our originally developed apex expansion method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 100 patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy were included. A hydrogel spacer was inserted in 64 and 36 patients using the conventional and apex expansion methods, respectively. For dosimetry, we trisected the rectum into the upper rectum, middle rectum, and lower rectum on the sagittal section of magnetic resonance imaging. We compared the dose to each part of the rectum between the two methods using dose-volume histograms. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity assessments were conducted until 3 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The whole rectal dose in the apex expansion method group was lower than that in the conventional method group, which was significant in all dose regions (V5-V35). Similarly, in the apex expansion method group, the dose to the middle rectum was lower in the low- to high-dose region (V10-V35), and the dose to the lower rectum was lower in the middle- to high-dose region (V15-35). No Grade ≥ 3 toxicity or procedure-related complications were observed. Additionally, Grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities during the treatment showed no significant differences between the two methods.

CONCLUSION

The apex expansion method may be safe and effective in achieving a more efficient rectal dose reduction by expanding the anterior perirectal space in the prostatic apex area.

High dose proton and photon-based radiation therapy for 213 liver lesions: a multi-institutional dosimetric comparison with a clinical perspective

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and Proton therapy (PT) are both options in the management of liver lesions. Limited clinical-dosimetric comparison are available. Moreover, dose-constraint routinely used in liver PT and SRT considers only the liver spared, while optimization strategies to limit the liver damaged are poorly reported.

METHODS

Primary endpoint was to assess and compare liver sparing of four contemporary RT techniques. Secondary endpoints were freedom from local recurrence (FFLR), overall survival (OS), acute and late toxicity. We hypothesize that Focal Liver Reaction (FLR) is determined by a similar biologic dose. FLR was delineated on follow-up MRI. Mean C.I. was computed for all the schedules used. A so-called Fall-off Volume (FOV) was defined as the area of healthy liver (liver-PTV) receiving more than the isotoxic dose. Fall-off Volume Ratio (FOVR) was defined as ratio between FOV and PTV.

RESULTS

213 lesions were identified. Mean best fitting isodose (isotoxic doses) for FLR were 18Gy, 21.5 Gy and 28.5 Gy for 3, 5 and 15 fractions. Among photons, an advantage in terms of healthy liver sparing was found for Vmat FFF with 5mm jaws (p = 0.013) and Cyberknife (p = 0.03). FOV and FOVR resulted lower for PT (p < 0.001). Three years FFLR resulted 83%. Classic Radiation induced liver disease (RILD, any grade) affected 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyberknife and V-MAT FFF with 5mm jaws spare more liver than V-MAT FF with 10 mm jaws. PT spare more liver compared to photons. FOV and FOVR allows a quantitative analysis of healthy tissue sparing performance showing also the quality of plan in terms of dose fall-off.

Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies

The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is not well studied or reported in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies, despite its success in the definitive management of other cancer sites. This report describes a rigorous quality assurance process for patients to undergo dose escalation to the pelvis via stereotactic photon beam irradiation. Patients who receive SBRT must be ineligible for conventional brachytherapy boost and undergo comprehensive informed consent. Fiducial placement, bowel prep, Foley catheter placement with standardized bladder filling, computerized tomography (CT) simulation with whole-body immobilization, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assisted target delineation, planning aims based on the established brachytherapy literature, and physics consultation for SBRT plan optimization are necessary. Prior to each fraction, the simulation position is reproduced and verified with on-table cone beam CT, and the position is maintained with whole-body immobilization. Following treatment, the treating physician is active in survivorship and toxicity management. Gynecologic SBRT is an ongoing area of study, and preliminary successes in delivering high-quality stereotactic dose escalation suggest prospective investigation is warranted. By adhering to strict quality control measures and following a pre-defined best standard of practice, patients with gynecologic malignancies who are ineligible for traditional brachytherapy procedures can be safely treated with SBRT.

Optimizing Clinical Implementation of Hypofractionation: Comprehensive Evidence Synthesis and Practical Guidelines for Low- and Middle-Income Settings

The global cancer burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), worsens existing disparities, amplified by the rising costs of advanced treatments. The shortage of radiation therapy (RT) services is a significant issue in LMICs. Extended conventional treatment regimens pose significant challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) and ultra-hypofractionated/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offer promising alternatives by shortening treatment durations. This approach optimizes the utilization of radiotherapy machines, making them more effective in meeting the growing demand for cancer care. Adopting HRT/SBRT holds significant potential, especially in LMICs. This review provides the latest clinical evidence and guideline recommendations for the application of HRT/SBRT in the treatment of breast, prostate, and lung cancers. It emphasizes the critical importance of rigorous training, technology, stringent quality assurance, and safety protocols to ensure precise and secure treatments. Additionally, it addresses practical considerations for implementing these treatments in LMICs, highlighting the need for comprehensive support and collaboration to enhance patient access to advanced cancer care.

MR-LINAC, a New Partner in Radiation Oncology: Current Landscape

Technological advances in radiation oncology are oriented towards improving treatment precision and tumor control. Among these advances, magnetic-resonance-image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) stands out, with technological advances to deliver targeted treatments adapted to a tumor's anatomy on the day while minimizing incidental exposure to organs at risk, offering an unprecedented therapeutic advantage compared to X-ray-based IGRT delivery systems. This new technology changes the traditional workflow in radiation oncology and requires an evolution in team coordination to administer more precise treatments. Once implemented, it paves the way for newer indication for radiation therapy to safely deliver higher doses than ever before, with better preservation of healthy tissues to optimize patient outcomes. In this narrative review, we assess the technical aspects of the novel linear accelerators that can deliver MRgRT and summarize the available published experience to date, focusing on oncological results and future challenges.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer: a systematic review on the choice of photon energy and linac flattened/unflattened beams

SBRT is an effective local treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This treatment is currently used in patients who have poor lung function or who decline surgery. As SBRT usually has small PTV margins, reducing the beam-on-time (BOT) is beneficial for accurate dose delivery by minimising intrafraction motion as well as improved patient comfort. Removal of the linear accelerator flattening filter can provide a higher dose rate which results in a faster treatment. In addition, the choice of photon energy can also affect the dose distribution to the target and the organs-at-risk (OAR). In this systematic review, studies analysing the choice of various photon beam energies, with a flattening filter or flattening filter free (FFF), were compared for their overall dosimetric benefit in the SBRT treatment for early-stage NSCLC. It was found that FFF treatment delivers a comparatively more conformal dose distribution, as well as a better homogeneity index and conformity index, and typically reduces BOT by between 30 and 50%. The trade-off may be a minor increase in monitor units for FFF treatment found in some studies but not others. Target conformity and OAR sparing, particularly lung doses appear better with 6MV FFF, but 10MV FFF was marginally more advantageous for skin sparing and BOT reduction. The favourable beam modality for clinical use would depend on the individual case, for which tumour size and depth, radiotherapy technique, as well as fractionation scheme need to be taken into account.

Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)is a common type of liver cancer with a poor prognosis, especially in patients with advanced stages or underlying liver disease. While surgical resection, liver transplantation, and ablation therapies have traditionally been the mainstay of treatment for HCC, radiation therapy has become increasingly recognized as an effective alternative, particularly for those who are not surgical candidates. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a highly precise form of radiation therapy that delivers very high doses of radiation to the tumor while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. Several studies have reported favorable outcomes with SBRT in HCC treatment. Moreover, SBRT can be used to treat recurrent HCC after prior treatment, offering a potentially curative approach in select cases. While SBRT has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in treating HCC, future studies are needed to further investigate the potential role of SBRT in combination with other treatments for HCC.

Tumor hypoxia and radiotherapy: A major driver of resistance even for novel radiotherapy modalities

Hypoxia in solid tumors is an important predictor of poor clinical outcome to radiotherapy. Both physicochemical and biological processes contribute to a reduced sensitivity of hypoxic tumor cells to ionizing radiation and hypoxia-related treatment resistances. A conventional low-dose fractionated radiotherapy regimen exploits iterative reoxygenation in between the individual fractions, nevertheless tumor hypoxia still remains a major hurdle for successful treatment outcome. The technological advances achieved in image guidance and highly conformal dose delivery make it nowadays possible to prescribe larger doses to the tumor as part of single high-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy, while keeping an acceptable level of normal tissue complication in the co-irradiated organs at risk. However, we insufficiently understand the impact of tumor hypoxia to single high-doses of RT and hypofractionated RT. So-called FLASH radiotherapy, which delivers ionizing radiation at ultrahigh dose rates (> 40 Gy/sec), has recently emerged as an important breakthrough in the radiotherapy field to reduce normal tissue toxicity compared to irradiation at conventional dose rates (few Gy/min). Not surprisingly, oxygen consumption and tumor hypoxia also seem to play an intriguing role for FLASH radiotherapy. Here we will discuss the role of tumor hypoxia for radiotherapy in general and in the context of novel radiotherapy treatment approaches.

Incorporating Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy into the Multidisciplinary Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has challenged the conventional wisdom surrounding the radioresistance of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the past decade, there has been a significant accumulation of clinical data to support the safety and efficacy of SABR in RCC. Herein, we review the use of SABR across the spectrum of RCC. We performed an online search of the Pubmed database from January 1990 through April 2023. Studies of SABR/stereotactic radiosurgery targeting primary, extracranial, and intracranial metastatic RCC were included. For SABR in non-metastatic RCC, this includes its use in small renal masses, larger renal masses, and inferior vena cava tumor thrombi. In the metastatic setting, SABR can be used at diagnosis, for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease, and for symptomatic reasons. Notably, SABR can be used for both the primary renal tumor and metastasis-directed therapy. Management of RCC is evolving rapidly, and the role that SABR will have in this landscape is being assessed in a number of ongoing prospective clinical trials. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence corroborating the use of SABR in RCC.

Automated treatment planning for liver cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quality of fully automated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning based on volumetric modulated arc therapy, which can reduce the reliance on historical plans and the experience of dosimetrists.

METHODS

Fully automated re-planning was performed on twenty liver cancer patients, automated plans based on automated SBRT planning (ASP) program and manual plans were conducted and compared. One patient was randomly selected and evaluate the repeatability of ASP, ten automated and ten manual SBRT plans were generated based on the same initial optimization objectives. Then, ten SBRT plans were generated for another selected randomly patient with different initial optimization objectives to assess the reproducibility. All plans were clinically evaluated in a double-blinded manner by five experienced radiation oncologists.

RESULTS

Fully automated plans provided similar planning target volume dose coverage and statistically better organ at risk sparing compared to the manual plans. Notably, automated plans achieved significant dose reduction in spinal cord, stomach, kidney, duodenum, and colon, with a median dose of D2% reduction ranging from 0.64 to 2.85 Gy. R50% and Dmean of ten rings for automated plans were significantly lower than those of manual plans. The average planning time for automated and manual plans was 59.8 ± 7.9 min vs. 127.1 ± 16.8 min (- 67.3 min).

CONCLUSION

Automated planning for SBRT, without relying on historical data, can generate comparable or even better plan quality for liver cancer compared with manual planning, along with better reproducibility, and less clinically planning time.

Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Mistletoe and Hyperthermia in Addition to Palliative Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

This retrospective analysis investigated the influence of integrative therapies in addition to palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, treated at a single institution specialized in integrative oncology between January 2015 and December 2019. In total, 206 consecutive patients were included in the study, whereof 142 patients (68.9%) received palliative chemotherapy (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel 33.8%; FOLFIRINOX 35.9%; gemcitabine 30.3%) while the remainder were treated with best supportive and integrative care. Integrative therapies were used in 117 of 142 patients (82.4%) in addition to conventional chemotherapy, whereby mistletoe was used in 117 patients (82.4%) and hyperthermia in 74 patients (52.1%). A total of 107/142 patients (86.3%) died during the observation period, whereby survival times differed significantly depending on the additional use of integrative mistletoe or hyperthermia: chemotherapy alone 8.6 months (95% CI 4.7-15.4), chemotherapy and only mistletoe therapy 11.2 months (95% CI 7.1-14.2), or a combination of chemotherapy with mistletoe and hyperthermia 18.9 months (95% CI 15.2-24.5). While the survival times observed for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy alone are consistent with pivotal phase-III studies and German registry data, we found significantly improved survival using additional mistletoe and/or hyperthermia.

Optimal timing for local ablative treatment of bone oligometastases in non-small cell lung cancer

Oligometastases is a term commonly used to describe a disease state characterized by a limited number of distant metastases, and represents a transient phase between localized and widespread systemic diseases. This subgroup of stage IV cancer has increased in clinical importance due to the possibility of curative rather than palliative treatment. Among advanced lung cancer patients, 30-40% show bone metastases, and can show complications such as pathological fractures. Many prospective studies have shown efficacy of localized treatment in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in improving progression-free survival and overall survival. Compared to metastases in other organs, bone metastases are unique in terms of tumor microenvironment and clinical outcomes. Radiotherapy is the most frequently used treatment modality for local ablative treatment for both primary and metastatic lesions. Stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrated more rapid and effective pain control compared to conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy. Radiotherapy improved outcomes in terms of time-to-skeletal related events skeletal-related events (SRE), hospitalization for SRE, pain relief, and overall survival in patients with bone metastases. Decision on timing of local ablative treatment depends on patient's overall clinical status, treatment goals, potential side effects of each approach, and expected initial responses to systemic anti-cancer treatment.

Outcomes for oligometastatic head and neck cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: Results from an international multi-institutional consortium

BACKGROUND

We report the results of an international multi-institutional cohort of oligometastatic (OMD) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with SBRT.

METHODS

Patients with OMD HNC (≤5 metastases) treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2016 at six institutions were included. Treated metastasis control (TMC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by multivariable analysis (MVA).

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with 84 HNC oligometastases were analyzed. The TMC rate at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 66%, with a median time to recurrence of 10.1 months. The median PFS and OS were 4.7 and 23.3 months. MVA identified a PTV point maximum (BED)10 > 100 Gy as a predictor of improved TMC (HR = 0.31, p = 0.034), and a cumulative PTV > 48 cc as having worse PFS (HR = 2.99, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Favorable TMC and OS was observed in OMD HNCs treated with SBRT.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for sarcoma pulmonary metastases

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is standard for patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC. We hypothesized that SBRT for sarcoma pulmonary metastases would achieve high rates of local control with acceptable toxicity and that patients with oligometastatic disease may achieve prolonged survival following SBRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This retrospective review included consecutive patients at our institution treated with SBRT for sarcoma pulmonary metastases. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was estimated using a competing risks framework.

RESULTS

We identified 66 patients treated to 95 pulmonary metastases with SBRT. The median follow-up from the time of SBRT was 36 months (95% CI 34 - 53 months). The cumulative incidence of LF at 12 and 24 months was 3.1% (95% CI 0.9 - 10.6%) and 7.4% (95% CI 4.0% - 13.9%), respectively. The 12- and 24-month overall survival was 74% (95% CI 64 - 86%) and 49% (38 - 63%), respectively. Oligometastatic disease, intrathoracic only disease, and performance status were associated with improved survival on univariable analysis. Three patients had grade 2 pneumonitis, and one patient had grade 2 esophagitis. No patients had ≥ grade 3+ toxicities.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients treated with SBRT for pulmonary sarcoma metastases. We observed that SBRT offers an effective alternative to surgical resection with excellent local control and low proportions of toxicity.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for ultracentral lung tumours

Ultracentral (UC) lung lesions are generally defined by the presence of the tumour or the Planning Target Volume (PTV) abutting proximal bronchial tree (PBT) or the esophagus. Initial reports rose awareness regarding the potential toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) when delivered to UC lesions. Major concerns include necrosis, stenosis, and bleeding of the PBT. Technological improvements now enable the delivery of more accurate treatments, possibly redefining the historical "no-fly zone". In this review, studies focusing on the treatment of UC lesions with SBRT are presented. The narrow therapeutic window requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Salvage Locoregional Therapy Following Progression After Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Associated with Improved Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of salvage locoregional therapy (salvage-LT) on survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients presenting with intrahepatic tumor progression following radiotherapy.

METHODS

This single-institution retrospective analysis included consecutive HCC patients having intrahepatic tumor progression following radiotherapy during 2015-2019. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of intrahepatic tumor progression after initial radiotherapy by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests and Cox regression models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. An inverse probability weighting was used to estimate treatment effect of salvage-LT considering confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients (mean age ± SD, 70 years ± 10; 97 men) were evaluated. Among those, 35 patients underwent 59 sessions of salvage-LT, including transarterial embolization/chemoembolization (n = 33), ablation (n = 11), selective internal radiotherapy (n = 7), and external beam radiotherapy (n = 8). At a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range, 3.4-54.5 months), the median OS was 23.3 months in patients who received salvage-LT and 6.6 months who did not. At multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh class, albumin-bilirubin grade, extrahepatic disease, and lack of salvage-LT were independent predictors of worse OS. After inverse probability weighting, salvage-LT was associated with a survival benefit of 8.9 months (95% CI: 1.1, 16.7 months; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage locoregional therapy is associated with increased survival in HCC patients suffering from intrahepatic tumor progression following initial radiotherapy.

Evaluation of tumour motion and internal/external correlation in lung SABR

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyse lung tumour motion and to investigate the correlation between the internal tumour motion acquired from four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and the motion of an external surrogate.

METHODS

A data set of 363 4DCT images was analysed. Tumours were classified based on their anatomical lobes. The recorded gross tumour volume (GTV) information included the centroid GTV motion in the superior-inferior, anteroposterior and left-right directions, and in three-dimensions (3D). For the internal/external correlation, the RPM surrogate breathing signals of 260 patients were analysed via an in-house script. The external motion was correlated with the 3D centroid motion, and the maximum tumour motion via Spearman's correlation. The effect of tumour volume on the amount of motion was evaluated.

RESULTS

The greatest 3D tumour amplitude was found for tumours located in the lower part of the lung, with a maximum of 26.7 mm. The Spearman's correlation of the internal 3D motion was weak in the upper (r = 0.21) and moderate in the middle (r = 0.51) and the lower (r = 0.52) lobes. There was no obvious difference in the correlation coefficients between the maximum tumour displacement and the centroid motion. No correlation was found between the tumour volume and the magnitude of motion.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that tumour location can be a good predictor of its motion. However, tumour size is a poor predictor of the motion.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This knowledge of the distribution of tumour motion throughout the thoracic regions will be valuable to research groups investigating the refinement of motion management strategies.

Are liver contour and bone fusion comparable to fiducials for IGRT in liver SBRT?

Introduction

Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly being used to treat tumours. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in patient positioning when using implanted fiducials as surrogates compared to alternative methods based on liver contour or bone registration.

Material and methods

Eighteen patients treated with SBRT who underwent a fiducial placement procedure were included. Fiducial guidance was our gold standard to guide treatment in this study. After recording the displacements, when fusing the planning CT and CBCT performed in the treatment unit using fiducials, liver contour and bone reference, the differences between fiducials and liver contour and bone reference were calculated. Data from 88 CBCT were analyzed. The correlation between the displacements found with fiducials and those performed based on the liver contour and the nearest bone structure as references was determined. The mean, median, variance, range and standard deviation of the displacements with each of the fusion methods were obtained. μ, Ʃ, and σ values and margins were obtained.

Results

Lateral displacements of less than 3 mm with respect to the gold standard in 92% vs. 62.5% of cases using liver contour and bone references, respectively, with 93.2% vs. 65.9% in the AP axis and SI movement in 69.3% vs. 51.1%. The errors μ, σ and Ʃ of the fusions with hepatic contour and bone reference in SI were 0.26 mm, 4 mm and 3 mm, and 0.8 mm, 5 mm and 3 mm respectively.

Conclusion

Our study showed that displacements were smaller with the use of hepatic contour compared to bone reference and comparable to those obtained with the use of fiducials in the lateral, AP and SI motion axes. This would justify that hepatic contouring can be a guide in the treatment of patients in the absence of fiducials.

Consensus Quality Measures and Dose Constraints for Lung Cancer From the Veterans Affairs Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance Program and ASTRO Expert Panel

PURPOSE

For patients with lung cancer, it is critical to provide evidence-based radiation therapy to ensure high-quality care. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Radiation Oncology Program partnered with the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) as part of the VA Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance to develop lung cancer quality metrics and assess quality of care as a pilot program in 2016. This article presents recently updated consensus quality measures and dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A series of measures and performance standards were reviewed and developed by a Blue-Ribbon Panel of lung cancer experts in conjunction with ASTRO in 2022. As part of this initiative, quality, surveillance, and aspirational metrics were developed for (1) initial consultation and workup; (2) simulation, treatment planning, and treatment delivery; and (3) follow-up. The DVH metrics for target and organ-at-risk treatment planning dose constraints were also reviewed and defined.

RESULTS

Altogether, a total of 19 lung cancer quality metrics were developed. There were 121 DVH constraints developed for various fractionation regimens, including ultrahypofractionated (1, 3, 4, or 5 fractions), hypofractionated (10 and 15 fractionations), and conventional fractionation (30-35 fractions).

CONCLUSIONS

The devised measures will be implemented for quality surveillance for veterans both inside and outside of the VA system and will provide a resource for lung cancer-specific quality metrics. The recommended DVH constraints serve as a unique, comprehensive resource for evidence- and expert consensus-based constraints across multiple fractionation schemas.

The immunogenic radiation and new players in immunotherapy and targeted therapy for head and neck cancer

Although treatment modalities for head and neck cancer have evolved considerably over the past decades, survival rates have plateaued. The treatment options remained limited to definitive surgery, surgery followed by fractionated radiotherapy with optional chemotherapy, and a definitive combination of fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lately, immunotherapy has been introduced as the fourth modality of treatment, mainly administered as a single checkpoint inhibitor for recurrent or metastatic disease. While other regimens and combinations of immunotherapy and targeted therapy are being tested in clinical trials, adapting the appropriate regimens to patients and predicting their outcomes have yet to reach the clinical setting. Radiotherapy is mainly regarded as a means to target cancer cells while minimizing the unwanted peripheral effect. Radiotherapy regimens and fractionation are designed to serve this purpose, while the systemic effect of radiation on the immune response is rarely considered a factor while designing treatment. To bridge this gap, this review will highlight the effect of radiotherapy on the tumor microenvironment locally, and the immune response systemically. We will review the methodology to identify potential targets for therapy in the tumor microenvironment and the scientific basis for combining targeted therapy and radiotherapy. We will describe a current experience in preclinical models to test these combinations and propose how challenges in this realm may be faced. We will review new players in targeted therapy and their utilization to drive immunogenic response against head and neck cancer. We will outline the factors contributing to head and neck cancer heterogeneity and their effect on the response to radiotherapy. We will review in-silico methods to decipher intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity and how these algorithms can predict treatment outcomes. We propose that (a) the sequence of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy should be designed not only to annul cancer directly, but to prime the immune response. (b) Fractionation of radiotherapy and the extent of the irradiated field should facilitate systemic immunity to develop. (c) New players in targeted therapy should be evaluated in translational studies toward clinical trials. (d) Head and neck cancer treatment should be personalized according to patients and tumor-specific factors.

Role of Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Management of Pancreatic Cancer: An Endoscopic Oncologist Perspective

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with an aggressive clinical course. Patients with pancreatic cancer are usually asymptomatic until significant progression of their disease. Additionally, there are no effective screening guidelines for pancreatic cancer in the general population. This leads to a delay in diagnosis and treatment, resulting in poor clinical outcomes and low survival rates. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) is an indispensable tool for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. In the modern era, with exponential advancements in technology and device innovation, EUS is also being increasingly used in a variety of therapeutic interventions. In the context of pancreatic cancer where therapies are limited due to the advanced stage of the disease at diagnosis, EUS-guided interventions offer new and innovative options. Moreover, due to their minimally invasive nature and ability to provide real-time images for tumor localization and therapy, they are associated with fewer complication rates compared to conventional open and laparoscopic approaches. In this article, we detail the most current and important therapeutic applications of EUS for pancreatic cancer, namely EUS-guided Fine Needle Injections, EUS-guided Radiotherapy, and EUS-guided Ablations. Furthermore, we also discuss the feasibility and safety profile of each intervention in patients with pancreatic cancer to provide gastrointestinal medical oncologists, radiation and surgical oncologists, and therapeutic endoscopists with valuable information to facilitate patient discussions and aid in the complex decision-making process.

Accelerated hypofractionated magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy for oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer

Given the positive results from recent randomized controlled trials in patients with oligometastatic, oligoprogressive, or oligoresidual disease, the role of radiotherapy has expanded in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While small metastatic lesions are commonly treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), treatment of the primary tumor and involved regional lymph nodes may require prolonged fractionation schedules to ensure safety especially when treating larger volumes in proximity to critical organs-at-risk (OARs). We have developed an institutional MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT) workflow for these patients. We present a 71-year-old patient with stage IV NSCLC with oligoprogression of the primary tumor and associated regional lymph nodes in which MR-guided, online adaptive radiotherapy was performed, prescribing 60 Gy in 15 fractions. We describe our workflow, dosimetric constraints, and daily dosimetric comparisons for the critical OARs (esophagus, trachea, and proximal bronchial tree [PBT] maximum doses [D0.03cc]), in comparison to the original treatment plan recalculated on the anatomy of the day (i.e., predicted doses). During MRgRT, few fractions met the original dosimetric objectives: 6.6% for esophagus, 6.6% for PBT, and 6.6% for trachea. Online adaptive radiotherapy reduced the cumulative doses to the structures by 11.34%, 4.2%, and 5.62% when comparing predicted plan summations to the final delivered summation. Therefore, this case study presets a workflow and treatment paradigm for accelerated hypofractionated MRgRT due to the significant variations in daily dose to the central thoracic OARs to reduce treatment-related toxicity associated with radiotherapy.

A phase 2 study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SHINE): a single arm clinical trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Cancers of the head and neck region are often characterized by locally advanced, non-metastatic disease. Standard treatments for advanced cervico-facial cancers of the skin or primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) include combinations of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, which are associated with high rates of acute toxicity and complications. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to be a promising modality of treatment for this patient population in retrospective studies; to our knowledge, there are no prospective clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of SBRT in these patients.

METHODS

This phase 2, single institution, single arm study aims to evaluate response rates to SBRT in older age patients with locally advanced HNSCC for whom primary surgery is not recommended or performed. The intervention is SBRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions given every 3-4 days. Toxicity, quality of life and patient outcomes will be recorded regularly up to 24 months after completion of SBRT.

DISCUSSION

For this patient population, SBRT may offer a shorter and more effective treatment than the current standard of care palliative regimens. If the study demonstrates that SBRT is safe and effective, then this may lead to randomized studies comparing conventional radiotherapy to SBRT for selected head and neck cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435938 .  Date registered: June 17, 2020.

The Management of Oligometastatic Disease in Colorectal Cancer: Present Strategies and Future Perspectives

Oligometastatic disease has been described as an intermediate clinical state between localized cancer and systemically metastasized disease. Recent clinical studies have shown prolonged survival when aggressive locoregional approaches are added to systemic therapies in patients with oligometastases. The aim of this review is to outline the newest options to treat oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), also considering its molecular patterns. We present an overview of the available local treatment strategies, including surgical procedures, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), thermal ablation, as well as trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Moreover, since imaging methods provide crucial information for the early diagnosis and management of oligometastatic CRC, we discuss the role of modern radiologic techniques in selecting patients that are amenable to potentially curative locoregional treatments.

A survey of compliance with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy quality recommendations

INTRODUCTION

Many publications have proposed quality standards for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). However, data on the level of compliance with these guidelines is lacking in the literature. This study aimed to understand how these guidelines are applied in the clinic and to identify barriers to implementing such recommendations.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with multidisciplinary staff at radiation oncology centres across New South Wales formulated around the RANZCR Guidelines for Safe Practice of Stereotactic Body (Ablative) Radiation Therapy. The interview responses were grouped into 20 topics, assessed against the guidelines and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Good compliance with the guidelines was found, with more than 80% of centres achieving satisfactory results in more than half the topics. The areas with the lowest compliance were auditing, risk assessment and reporting recommendations. Barriers to the quality of SABR treatments included limited training opportunities, low patient numbers and a lack of clear requirements on comprehensive auditing and reporting.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the centres surveyed reported good compliance with most of the RANZCR SABR guidelines. The tasks with the lowest compliance were those that monitor quality outcomes. Potential strategies for improvement include inclusion in clinical trials and the use of databases which link treatment parameters, dosimetry and outcomes. Further work will focus on the barriers identified in this survey and propose practical solutions to improve compliance in these areas.

Clinical value of styrofoam fixation in intracranial tumor radiotherapy

Objective

To analyze the application value of two postural fixation techniques.(styrofoam combined with head mask and fixed headrest combined with head mask) in intracranial tumor radiotherapy via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

This study included 104 patients with intracranial tumors undergoing radiotherapy. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (54 cases with styrofoam fixation) and Group B (50 cases with fixed headrest fixation). The positional deviation in 3D space between the two groups was compared using CBCT. The set-up errors were expressed as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile)or M(p25, p75) since the set-up errors in all directions were not normally distributed,The Mann-Whitney U test was performed.

Results

The age and gender of patients in the two groups were not significantly different. The set-up errors of A in lateral (X), longitudinal (Y), vertical (Z), and yaw(Rtn) axes were 1.0 (0,1) mm, 1.0 (0,1) mm, 1.0 (0,2) mm, and 0.4 (0.1, 0.8) degrees, respectively while the set-up errors of B were 1.0 (0,1) mm, 1.0 (1,2) mm, 1.0 (0,2) mm, and 0.5 (0.15,0.9) degrees, respectively. Moreover, patients in the styrofoam group had significantly smaller set-up errors in the Y-axis than patients in the headrest group (p=0.001). However, set-up errors in the X, Z, and Rtn axes were not significantly different between the two groups. The expansion boundaries of the target area in the X, Y, and Z directions were 1.77 mm, 2.45 mm, and 2.47 mm, respectively. The outer expansion boundaries of the headrest group were 2.03 mm, 3.88 mm, and 2.57 mm in X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. The set-up times of groups A and B were (32.71 ± 5.21) seconds and (46.57 ± 6.68) seconds, respectively (p=0.014). Patients in group A had significantly better comfort satisfaction than patients in group B (p=0.001).

Conclusion

Styrofoam plus head thermoplastic mask body fixation technique has a higher positional accuracy in intracranial tumor radiotherapy than headrest plus head thermoplastic mask fixation. Besides, styrofoam plus head thermoplastic mask body fixation technique is associated with improved positioning efficiency, and better comfort than headrest plus head thermoplastic mask fixation, and thus can be effectively applied for intracranial tumor radiotherapy positioning.

Local Liver Irradiation Concurrently Versus Sequentially with Cabozantinib on the Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution in Rats

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiotherapy (RT)-pharmacokinetics (PK) effect of cabozantinib in concurrent or sequential regimens with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Concurrent and sequential regimens involving RT and cabozantinib were designed. The RT–drug interactions of cabozantinib under RT were confirmed in a free-moving rat model. The drugs were separated on an Agilent ZORBAX SB-phenyl column with a mobile phase consisting of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4)–methanol solution (27:73, v/v) for cabozantinib. There were no statistically significant differences in the concentration versus time curve of cabozantinib (AUCcabozantinib) between the control group and the RT2Gy×3 f’x and RT9Gy×3 f’x groups in the concurrent and the sequential regimens. However, compared to those in the control group, the Tmax, T1/2 and MRT decreased by 72.8% (p = 0.04), 49.0% (p = 0.04) and 48.5% (p = 0.04) with RT2Gy×3 f’x in the concurrent regimen, respectively. Additionally, the T1/2 and MRT decreased by 58.8% (p = 0.01) and 57.8% (p = 0.01) in the concurrent RT9Gy×3 f’x group when compared with the control group, respectively. The biodistribution of cabozantinib in the heart increased by 271.4% (p = 0.04) and 120.0% (p = 0.04) with RT2Gy×3 f’x in the concurrent and sequential regimens compared to the concurrent regimen, respectively. Additionally, the biodistribution of cabozantinib in the heart increased by 107.1% (p = 0.01) with the RT9Gy×3 f’x sequential regimen. Compared to the RT9Gy×3 f’x concurrent regimen, the RT9Gy×3 f’x sequential regimen increased the biodistribution of cabozantinib in the heart (81.3%, p = 0.02), liver (110.5%, p = 0.02), lung (125%, p = 0.004) and kidneys (87.5%, p = 0.048). No cabozantinib was detected in the brain in any of the groups. The AUC of cabozantinib is not modulated by irradiation and is not affected by treatment strategies. However, the biodistribution of cabozantinib in the heart is modulated by off-target irradiation and SBRT doses simultaneously. The impact of the biodistribution of cabozantinib with RT9Gy×3 f’x is more significant with the sequential regimen than with the concurrent regimen.

The Effectiveness and Toxicity of Frameless CyberKnife Based Radiosurgery for Parkinson's Disease-Phase II Study

Frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has an established role in the treatment of tremor in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The low numbers of studies of frameless approaches led to our prospective phase 2 open-label single-arm clinical trial (NCT02406105), which aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CyberKnife frameless SRS. Twenty-three PD patients were irradiated on the area of the thalamic ventral nuclei complex with gradually increasing doses of 70 to 105 Gy delivered in a single fraction. After SRS, patients were monitored for tremor severity and the toxicity of the treatment. Both subjective improvement and dose-dependent efficacy were analysed using standard statistical tests. The median follow-up was 23 months, and one patient died after COVID-19 infection. Another two patients were lost from follow-up. Hyper-response resulting in vascular toxicity and neurologic complications was observed in two patients irradiated with doses of 95 and 100 Gy, respectively. A reduction in tremor severity was observed in fifteen patients, and six experienced stagnation. A constant response during the whole follow-up was observed in 67% patients. A longer median response time was achieved in patients irradiated with doses equal to or less than 85 Gy. Only two patients declared no improvement after SRS. The efficacy of frameless SRS is high and could improve tremor control in a majority of patients. The complication rate is low, especially when doses below 90 Gy are applied. Frameless SRS could be offered as an alternative for patients ineligible for deep brain stimulation; however, studies regarding optimal dose are required.

Multi-Institutional Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Incident Learning: Evaluation of Safety Barriers Using a Human Factors Analysis and Classification System

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can improve therapeutic ratios and patient convenience, but delivering higher doses per fraction increases the potential for patient harm. Incident learning systems (ILSs) are being increasingly adopted in radiation oncology to analyze reported events. This study used an ILS coupled with a Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) and barriers management to investigate the origin and detection of SBRT events and to elucidate how safeguards can fail allowing errors to propagate through the treatment process.

METHODS

Reported SBRT events were reviewed using an in-house ILS at 4 institutions over 2014-2019. Each institution used a customized care path describing their SBRT processes, including designated safeguards to prevent error propagation. Incidents were assigned a severity score based on the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group Report 275. An HFACS system analyzed failing safeguards.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty events were analyzed with 106 near misses (66.2%) and 54 incidents (33.8%). Fifty incidents were designated as low severity, with 4 considered medium severity. Incidents most often originated in the treatment planning stage (38.1%) and were caught during the pretreatment review and verification stage (37.5%) and treatment delivery stage (31.2%). An HFACS revealed that safeguard failures were attributed to human error (95.2%), routine violation (4.2%), and exceptional violation (0.5%) and driven by personnel factors 32.1% of the time, and operator condition also 32.1% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving communication and documentation, reducing time pressures, distractions, and high workload should guide proposed improvements to safeguards in radiation oncology.

Can the use of knowledge-based planning systems improve stereotactic radiotherapy planning? A systematic review

Introduction:

This study aimed to systematically review the literature to synthesise and summarise whether using knowledge-based planning (KBP) can improve the planning of stereotactic radiotherapy treatments.

Methods:

A systematic literature search was carried out using Medline, Scopus and Cochrane databases to evaluate the use of KBP planning in stereotactic radiotherapy. Three hundred twenty-five potential studies were identified and screened to find 25 relevant studies.

Results:

Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Where a commercial KBP was used, 72.7% of studies reported a quality improvement, and 45.5% reported a reduction in planning time. There is evidence that when used as a quality control tool, KBP can highlight stereotactic plans that need revision. In studies that use KBP as the starting point for radiotherapy planning optimisation, the radiotherapy plans generated are typically equal to or superior to those planned manually.

Conclusions:

There is evidence that KBP has the potential to improve the quality and speed of stereotactic radiotherapy planning. Further research is required to accurately quantify such systems’ quality improvements and time savings. Notably, there has been little research into their use for prostate, spinal or liver stereotactic radiotherapy, and research in these areas would be desirable. It is recommended that future studies use the ICRU 91 level 2 reporting format and that blinded physician review could add a qualitative assessment of KBP system performance.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Renal Cell Cancer: 24-Month Results of the RSR1 Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a new therapeutic option for primary renal cell carcinoma. However, treatment doses lack consistency in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for renal cancer SBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This phase 1 multicentric dose-escalation study assessed 4 dose levels: 8 Gy × 4, 8 Gy × 5, 10 Gy × 4, and 12 Gy × 4. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose, defined by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any acute side effect of grade ≥4 based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Averse Events, version 4.0.

RESULTS

From October 2010 to September 2017, 13 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 23 months. There was no dose-limiting toxicity in our study, and the highest dose was reached successfully. No acute or late toxic effects above grade 2 were seen. There was no significant alteration of renal function after treatment. At 24 months, 2 patients had partial response and the others had stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

After 24 months of follow-up, no dose-limiting toxicity was seen at any of the prescribed dose levels in our study. The findings suggest that our last dose level of 48 Gy in 4 12-Gy fractions can be considered safe and can be used in further studies.

Role of Functional MRI in Liver SBRT: Current Use and Future Directions

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for liver cancers whereby large doses of radiation can be delivered precisely to target lesions in 3-5 fractions. The target dose is limited by the dose that can be safely delivered to the non-tumour liver, which depends on the baseline liver functional reserve. Current liver SBRT guidelines assume uniform liver function in the non-tumour liver. However, the assumption of uniform liver function is false in liver disease due to the presence of cirrhosis, damage due to previous chemo- or ablative therapies or irradiation, and fatty liver disease. Anatomical information from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for SBRT planning. While its current use is limited to the identification of target location and size, functional MRI techniques also offer the ability to quantify and spatially map liver tissue microstructure and function. This review summarises and discusses the advantages offered by functional MRI methods for SBRT treatment planning and the potential for adaptive SBRT workflows.

Case report: Stereotactic body radiation therapy with 12 Gy for silencing refractory ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Encouraging results have been reported for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with 25 Gy. SBRT with 12 Gy for refractory VT was designed to reduce long-term cardiac toxicity.

METHODS

Stereotactic body radiation therapy-VT simulation, planning, and treatment were performed using standard techniques. A patient was treated with a marginal dose of 12 Gy in a single fraction to the planning target volume (PTV). The goal was for at least ≥ 95% of the PTV to be covered by at least 95% of 12 Gy radiation.

RESULTS

From April 2021 through June 2022, a patient with refractory VT underwent treatment. The volume for PTV was 65.8 cm3. The mean radiation dose administered to the heart (the heart volume excluding the PTV) was 2.2 Gy. No acute or late toxicity was observed after SBRT. Six months after SBRT, the patient experienced new monomorphic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) VT. Interestingly, the substrate of the left ventricular basal to middle posteroseptal wall before SBRT was turned into scar zones with a local voltage < 0.5 mV. Catheter ablation to treat RVOT VT was performed, and the situation remains stable to date.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the first patient with refractory VT successfully treated with 12.0 Gy SBRT, suggesting that 12 Gy is a potential dose to treat refractory VT. Further investigations and enrollment of more patients are warranted to assess the long-term efficacy and side effects of this treatment.

Imaging Features in the Liver after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Historically, radiation therapy was not considered in treatment of liver tumors owing to the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. However, development of highly conformed radiation treatments such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increased use of radiation therapy in the liver. SBRT is indicated in treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors with outcomes comparable to those of other local therapies, especially in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. After SBRT, imaging features of the tumor and surrounding background hepatic parenchyma demonstrate a predictable pattern immediately after treatment and during follow-up. The goals of SBRT are to deliver a lethal radiation dose to the targeted liver tumor and to minimize radiation dose to normal liver parenchyma and other adjacent organs. Evaluation of tumor response after SBRT centers on changes in size and enhancement; however, these changes are often delayed secondary to the underlying physiologic effects of radiation. Knowledge of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of SBRT should allow better understanding of the typical imaging features in detection of tumor response and avoid misinterpretation from common pitfalls and atypical imaging findings. Imaging features of radiation-induced change in the surrounding liver parenchyma are characterized by a focal liver reaction that can potentially be mistaken for no response or recurrence of tumor. Knowledge of the pattern and chronology of this phenomenon may allay any uncertainty in assessment of tumor response. Other pitfalls related to fiducial marker placement or combination therapies are important to recognize. The authors review the basic principles of SBRT and illustrate post-SBRT imaging features of treated liver tumors and adjacent liver parenchyma with a focus on avoiding pitfalls in imaging evaluation of response. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer: protocol for a prospective randomised control clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The systemic therapy, especially androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is currently recommended for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, the results have not been satisfactory including adverse reactions and castration resistance. Therefore, it is necessary to explore more effective treatment to prolong biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and delay the start of hormonal therapy for treating oligometastatic PCa. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment alternative for patients with oligometastases with high local control rates and minimal toxic effects. This prospective trial aims to demonstrate whether SBRT for the oligometastases of hormone-sensitive PCa can delay the start of ADT and prolong the time from inception of the study to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patients with ≤3 oligometastatic recurrences, diagnosed on Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT, will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio between arm A (ADT only) and arm B (SBRT for oligometastases only). SBRT is conducted by CyberKnife with prescription dose 30-50 Gy in 3-5 fractions. One of the primary endpoints is ADT-free survival of arm B, the other is the time from inception of the study to CRPC. The secondary endpoints include radiotherapy-related toxicity, ADT-related toxicity, bPFS, local PFS and overall survival. Toxicity will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria V.5.0.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Shanghai Changhai Hospital (CHEC2020-101). This is a randomised control clinical trial comparing SBRT to ADT for men with oligometastatic PCa. The study will be performed in compliance with applicable local legislation and in accordance with the ethical principles developed by the World Medical Association in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013. Study results will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT04599686.

The Emerging Role of Radiation Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Advancements in radiation delivery technology have made it feasible to treat tumors with ablative radiation doses via stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SAbR) at locations that were previously not possible. Renal cell cancer (RCC) was initially thought to be radioresistant, even considered toxic, in the era of conventional protracted course radiation. However, SAbR has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in providing local control to both primary and metastatic RCC by using ablative radiation doses. SAbR can be integrated with other local and systemic therapies to provide optimal management of RCC patients. We will discuss the rationale and available evidence for the integration and sequencing of SAbR with local and systemic therapies for RCC.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?

Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques on patient toxicity and survival rates reported from January 2017 to September 2020. The main aims are to establish if dosimetric and efficiency gains correlate with improved survival and reduced toxicities and to answer the question ‘What is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation of VMAT?’. Compared with 3DCRT, improvements have been reported with VMAT in prostate, locally advanced cervical carcinoma and various head and neck applications, leading to the shift in technology to VMAT. Other sites such as thoracic neoplasms and nasopharyngeal carcinomas have observed some improvement with VMAT although not in line with improved dosimetric measures, and the burden of toxicity and the incidence of cancer related deaths remain high, signaling the need to further mitigate toxicity and increase survival. As technological advancement continues, large randomised long-term clinical trials are required to determine the way-forward and offer site-specific recommendations. These studies are usually expensive and time consuming, therefore utilising pooled real-world data in a prospective nature can be an alternative solution to comprehensively assess the efficacy of modern radiotherapy techniques.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Conventional External Beam Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) in patients with previously unirradiated painful bone metastases (BM).

METHODS

We searched biomedical databases for eligible randomized trials (RCTs). The outcomes of interest were pain response, local progression, overall survival (OS) and adverse events. We used established tools to assess the quality of the individual trials and certainty of the pooled evidence. We performed meta-analyses using random effects models.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were identified. SBRT improved complete pain response rates at 3 months (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.88-6.07; high certainty), reduced local progression rates (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.62; high certainty) and increase pain flare rates. There were no differences for other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with previously unirradiated painful BM, SBRT significantly improved complete pain response rates at 3 months, delayed local progression and increase pain flare rates.

Treatment plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using either 6- or 10-MV photon energies

Purpose

The aim of this study was to dosimetrically compare volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques using either 6‐ or 10‐MV photon beam energies in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans.

Methods

Thirty patients with primary or metastatic lung tumors eligible for SBRT were randomly selected. VMAT and IMRT treatment plans using either 6‐ or 10‐MV photon energies were generated through automatic SBRT planning software in the RayStation treatment planning system.

Results

For planning target volume, there was no difference in D_95% for all plans, whereas D_2% and D_50% were significantly increased by 5.22%–5.98% and 2.47%–2.59%, respectively, using VMAT_6/10‐MV plans compared to IMRT_6/10‐MV plans. When comparing the D_max of organs at risk (OARs), VMAT_6/10‐MV was 18.32%–47.95% lower than IMRT_6/10‐MV for almost all OARs. VMAT_6/10‐MV obviously decreased D_mean, V_5Gy, V_10Gy, and V_20Gy of whole lung by 9.68%–20.92% than IMRT_6/10‐MV. Similar results were found when comparing VMAT_6‐MV with IMRT_10‐MV or VMAT_10‐MV with IMRT_6‐MV. The differences in the D_2%, heterogeneity index, and conformity index between 6‐ and 10‐MV plans are not statistically significant. Plans using 6‐MV performed 4.68%–8.91% lower levels of D_max of spinal cord, esophagus, great vessels, and trachea and proximal bronchial tree than those using 10‐MV plans. Similarly, D_mean, V_5Gy, V_10Gy, and V_20Gy of whole lung were also reduced by 2.79%–5.25% using 6‐MV. For dose fall‐off analysis, the D_2cm and R_50% of VMAT_6/10‐MV were lower than those of IMRT_6/10‐MV. Dose fall‐off curve based on 10 rings was steeper for VMAT plans than IMRT plans regardless of the energy used.

Conclusions

For lung SBRT plans, VMAT‐based plans significantly reduced OARs dose and steepened dose fall‐off curves compared to IMRT‐based plans. A 6‐MV energy level was a better choice than 10‐MV for lung SBRT. In addition, the dose differences between different techniques were more obvious than those between different energy levels.

In Silico Trial of Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the Treatment of Abdominal Oligometastases

PURPOSE

We conducted a prospective, in silico clinical imaging study (NCTXXXX) to evaluate the feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of abdominal oligometastases. We hypothesized that CT-STAR produces improved dosimetry compared to non-adapted CT-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS/MATERIALS

Eight patients receiving SBRT for abdominal oligometastatic disease received five additional kV cone beam CTs (CBCTs) on the ETHOS system. These additional CBCTs were used for imaging during an emulator treatment session. Initial plans were created based on their simulation (P_I) and emulated adaptive plans (P_A) were based on anatomy-of-the-day. The prescription was 50 Gy/5 fractions. Organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints were prioritized over planning target volume coverage under a strict isotoxicity approach. The P_I was applied to the patient's anatomy-of-the-day and compared to the re-optimized P_A using dose volume histogram metrics, with selection of the superior plan. Feasibility was defined as completion of the adaptive workflow and compliance with strict OAR constraints in ≥80% of fractions. Fractions were performed under time pressures by a physician and physicist to mimic the adaptive process.

RESULTS

CT-STAR was feasible, with successful workflow completion in 38/40 (95%) fractions. P_I application to daily anatomy created OAR constraint violations in 30/40 (75%) fractions. There were 8 stomach, 18 duodenum, 16 small bowel, and 11 large bowel P_I OAR constraint violations. In contrast, OAR violations occurred in 2/40 (5%) P_A (both small bowel violations, both improved from the P_I). CT-STAR also improved GTV V100 and D95 coverage in 25/40 (63%) and 20/40 (50%) fractions, respectively. 0/40 (0%) fractions were deemed non-feasible due to poor image quality and/or inability to delineate structures. Adaptation time per fraction was a median of 22.59 minutes (10.97-47.23).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-STAR resolved OAR hard constraint violations and/or improved target coverage in silico when compared to non-adapted CT-guided SBRT for the ablation of abdominal oligometastatic disease. While limitations of this study include its small sample size and in silico design, the consistently high quality CBCT images captured and comparable timing metrics to prior adaptive studies suggest that CT- STAR is a viable treatment paradigm for the ablation of abdominal oligometastatic disease. Clinical trials are in development to further evaluate CT-STAR in the clinic.