1
|
Chen X, Yu Q, Li P, Fu S. Landscape of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Clinical Application and Translational Research. Front Oncol 2021; 11:760752. [PMID: 34804961 PMCID: PMC8602827 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.760752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a useful and advanced technique for prostate cancer. This study sought to investigate the clinical efficacy and translational research for prostate cancer with carbon ion radiotherapy. We integrated the data from published articles, clinical trials websites, and our data. The efficacy of CIRT for prostate cancer was assessed in terms of overall survival, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and toxicity response. Up to now, clinical treatment of carbon ion radiotherapy has been carried in only five countries. We found that carbon ion radiotherapy induced little genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity when used for prostate cancer treatment. To some extent, it led to improved outcomes in overall survival, biochemical recurrence-free survival than conventional radiotherapy, especially for high-risk prostate cancer. Carbon ion radiotherapy brought clinical benefits for prostate cancer patients, and quality of life assessment indicated that CIRT affected patients to a lesser extent. Potential biomarkers from our omics-based study could be used to predict the efficacy of prostate cancer with CIRT. Carbon ion radiotherapy brought clinical benefits for prostate cancer patients. The omics-based translational research may provide insights into individualized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Proton & Heavy Ion Medical Center, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Concord Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy lon Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shen Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Proton & Heavy Ion Medical Center, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Concord Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tamponi M, Gabriele D, Maggio A, Stasi M, Meloni GB, Conti M, Gabriele P. Prostate cancer dose-response, fractionation sensitivity and repopulation parameters evaluation from 25 international radiotherapy outcome data sets. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180823. [PMID: 31017457 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to model the biochemical free survival at 5 years and to evaluate the parameters defining dose-response curve, dose-fractionation radiosensitivity and repopulation. METHODS It was carried out a literature search on Pubmed to retrieve data sets of patients treated with external beam radiation therapy of 1.8-4.0 Gy per fraction and overall treatment time of 3 to 10 weeks. 10 groups were identified, based on risk class and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Dose-response curve D50 (dose at 50% probability of control) and g50 (steepness), α/β (dose-fractionation radiosensitivity), and repopulation parameters, dprolif and Tprolif , were calculated. Bootstrap-based cross-validation was performed and median and 95% CI (confidence interval) were evaluated. RESULTS 25 data sets, including 20,310 patients, were considered. The median (95% CI) D50 and g50 values were 62 (CI 53 - 66) Gy and 1.6 (0.8 - 2.4). ADT patients showed lower values of D50 and g50 (57 ± 5 Gy and 1.1 ± 0.4) compared to no-ADT patients (65 ± 2 Gy and 2.3 ± 0.6), with p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002. If we did not consider any dependence on overall treatment time, the median (95% CI) value of α/β was 1.4 (1.0 - 1.9) Gy with p < 0.0001 for all patients. The median values of dproli f and Tprolif were 0.0 to 0.3 Gy/d and 18-40 days. CONCLUSION Dose-response curve resulted dependent on risk class and ADT, with higher steepness for no-ADT patients. Low values of dose-fractionation radiosensitivity were found, supporting the use of moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy in each risk class. A limited dependence on repopulation was observed. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Prostate cancer response to moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy was reliably quantified considering risk class and androgen deprivation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Tamponi
- 1 ATS, Sardinia Regional Health Service , Sassari , Italy
| | | | - Angelo Maggio
- 3 Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO , IRCCS, Candiolo (To) , Italy
| | - Michele Stasi
- 3 Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO , IRCCS, Candiolo (To) , Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Conti
- 2 Institute of Radiological Sciences University of Sassari , Italy.,4 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, AOU, University Hospital Trust of Sassari , Italy
| | - Pietro Gabriele
- 5 Radiation Therapy, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO , IRCCS, Candiolo (To) , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martell K, Mendez LC, Chung H, Tseng CL, Zhang L, Alayed Y, Liu S, Vesprini D, Chu W, Paudel M, Cheung P, Szumacher E, Ravi A, Loblaw A, Morton G. Absolute percentage of biopsied tissue positive for Gleason pattern 4 disease (APP4) appears predictive of disease control after high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019; 135:170-177. [PMID: 31015164 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To identify if, in intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa), the absolute percentage of biopsied tissue positive for pattern 4 disease (APP4) may be a predictor of outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS 411 patients with IR-PCa were retrospectively reviewed. APP4 was calculated based on biopsy reports. Multivariable competing risk analysis was then performed on optimized APP4 cutpoints to predict for biochemical failure (BF), androgen deprivation use for BF (ADT-BF) and development of metastases (MD). RESULTS Median follow-up for the cohort was 5.2 (Inter Quartile Range: 2.9-6.6) years. Median baseline PSA was 7.3 (5.3-9.8) ng/mL. 234 (56.9%) patients had T1 and 177 (43.1%) had T2 disease. Median APP4 was 2.00 (0.75-7.50)%. 38 (9.3%) patients experienced BF. The optimal cutpoint of APP4 for BF was >3.3% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66. 17 (4.1%) received ADT-BF. The ADT-BF cutpoint was >6.6% with an AUC of 0.72. Eight (2.0%) developed MD. The MD cutpoint was >17.5% with an AUC of 0.86. Using APP4 >3.3 vs ≤ 3.3, log-transformed baseline PSA ln(PSA) (HR 2.5, 1.1-6.1; p = 0.037) and APP4 (HR 2.3, 1.1-4.7; p = 0.031) predicted for BF. Using APP4 >6.6 vs ≤ 6.6, ln(PSA) (HR 4.2, 1.4-12.4; p = 0.010) and APP4 (HR 3.7, 1.4-10.0; p = 0.009) were predictive of ADT-BF. APP4 >17.5 vs ≤ 17.5 alone was predictive of MD (HR 25.7, 4.9-135.3; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION APP4 cutpoints of >3.3%, >6.6% and >17.5% were strongly associated with increased risk of BF, ADT-BF and developing MD respectively. These findings may inform future practice when treating IR-PCa but require external validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Martell
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - L C Mendez
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Western University, Department of Radiation Oncology, London, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
| | - H Chung
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - C L Tseng
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Zhang
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Y Alayed
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - S Liu
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - D Vesprini
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - W Chu
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Paudel
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - P Cheung
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - E Szumacher
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Ravi
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Loblaw
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Morton
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berlin A, Murgic J, Hosni A, Pintilie M, Salcedo A, Fraser M, Kamel-Reid S, Zhang J, Wang Q, Ch'ng C, Deheshi S, Davicioni E, van der Kwast T, Boutros PC, Bristow RG, Chua ML. Genomic Classifier for Guiding Treatment of Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancers to Dose-Escalated Image Guided Radiation Therapy Without Hormone Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103:84-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
5
|
Siddiqui ZA, Krauss DJ. Adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:378-389. [PMID: 30050798 PMCID: PMC6043751 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.01.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a commonly used curative modality for prostate cancer. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) increases the curative potential of prostate radiotherapy (RT) in multiple subsets of patients. In addition to having an independent cytotoxic effect, current evidence suggests that androgen deprivation synergistically works with radiation therapy by preventing DNA repair. Given the wide-ranging toxicities of this therapy, clinicians must judiciously choose which patients may benefit from ADT and also consider the appropriate length of treatment. With recent advances in RT delivery, higher doses of radiation are currently used when compared with the dose used in historic trials, leading to the unanswered question of how RT dose interacts with ADT. Current and future clinical studies are attempting to further define the appropriate indications and patient populations for which ADT represents a clinically appropriate addition to prostate RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaid A Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel J Krauss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hou WH, Huang CY, Wang CC, Lan KH, Chen CH, Yu HJ, Liu SP, Lai MK, Pu YS, Cheng JCH. Impact of androgen-deprivation therapy on the outcome of dose-escalation prostate cancer radiotherapy without elective pelvic irradiation. Asian J Androl 2018; 19:596-601. [PMID: 27506334 PMCID: PMC5566856 DOI: 10.4103/1008-682x.183569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The benefit of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with dose-escalated radiotherapy (DERT) for localized prostate cancer has not been determined in randomized studies. In this study, the benefit of ADT was assessed in patients uniformly treated with dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to the prostate and seminal vesicles but not pelvis. In all, 419 patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma underwent definitive IMRT (cumulative dose 78 Gy), with 32.6%, 33.1%, 32.1%, and 2.1% having T1 through T4 disease, respectively, and 51.2% having high-risk disease. ADT was given to 76.1% of patients. With a median follow-up of 60 months, 5-year biochemical failure-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates were 87%, 86%, and 87%, respectively. T stage was an independent predictor of all three rates. Five-year pelvic nodal recurrence rate was 2.9%. ADT improved biochemical failure-free and disease-free survival but not overall survival. ADT showed benefit in high-risk disease but not intermediate-risk disease. Late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities ≥ grade 2 occurred in 11.0% and 6.7%, respectively. In conclusion, DERT with 78 Gy yields good disease control and low rate of pelvic nodal recurrence. ADT improves disease-free survival in patients with high-risk but not intermediate-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Hsien Hou
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Chia-Chun Wang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Keng-Hsueh Lan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Hong-Jen Yu
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Shih-Ping Liu
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Ming-Kuen Lai
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Yeong-Shau Pu
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.,Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.,Graduate Institutes of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, China.,Graduate Institutes of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an important adjunctive therapy to external beam radiation therapy (RT) for the definitive management of prostate cancer. The role of ADT is well-established for locally advanced or high-risk disease in conjunction with standard doses of RT, but less defined for intermediate-risk disease or with dose-escalated RT. The goal of this review is to summarize evidence evaluating the combination of ADT/RT, focusing on recent trials and current controversies as they pertain to the practicing clinician. RECENT FINDINGS The benefit of ADT on biochemical control is maintained with dose-escalated RT according to recently reported phase III studies. Furthermore, there is now prospective, randomized evidence to support the addition of ADT to RT in the post-prostatectomy setting. ADT continues to play an important role for prostate cancer patients receiving dose-escalated RT. Future research is needed to identify subgroups most likely to benefit from this combination.
Collapse
|
8
|
Daoud MA, Aboelnaga EM, Alashry MS, Fathy S, Aletreby MA. Clinical outcome and toxicity evaluation of simultaneous integrated boost pelvic IMRT/VMAT at different dose levels combined with androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:4981-4988. [PMID: 29066917 PMCID: PMC5644603 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s141224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of dose escalation in patients receiving long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is still a controversial issue. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether dose escalation for ≥76–80 Gy had any advantage in terms of biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), or overall survival outcomes over the dose levels from 70 to <76 Gy. Patients and methods The study included a cohort of 24 patients classified with high- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. All patients received ADT, starting at 4–6 months before radiation therapy and continued for a total period of 12–24 months in high-risk patients. The treatment plan was given in two phases. In the first phase, the nodal planning target volume (PTV) and the prostate PTV received 48.6 and 54 Gy, respectively, over 27 fractions. The treatment was applied through intensity-modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Results More than half of the patients were in T3–T4 stage, 79.1% of the patients were in the high-risk category, and all patients received ADT. The rate of acute grade II gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities in all patients were 41.7% and 62.5%, respectively. The rate of freedom from grade II rectal toxicity at 2 years was 89% and 83% for patients treated with dose levels <76 and ≥76 Gy, respectively. The rate of BDFS at 2 years was 90% and 85% for doses <76 and ≥76 Gy, respectively. The DMFS at 2 years was 100% and 76% for dose levels <76 and ≥76 Gy, respectively. Conclusion In the current study, there were no significant differences in the BDFS and DMFS between patients treated with a dose of <76 and ≥76 Gy, including elective pelvic lymph nodes irradiation combined with ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A Daoud
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura.,Department of Oncology, Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Engy M Aboelnaga
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura
| | - Mohamed S Alashry
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura
| | - Salwa Fathy
- Department of Radiation, Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut
| | - Mostafa A Aletreby
- Department of Oncology, Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Medical Physics, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Al Manial, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Comparison of neoadjuvant vs concurrent/adjuvant androgen deprivation in men with high-risk prostate cancer receiving definitive radiation therapy. TUMORI JOURNAL 2017; 103:387-393. [PMID: 28085179 DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is unknown whether there is a benefit to starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prior to rather than concurrently with definitive radiation therapy in men with high-risk prostate cancer. We studied the National Cancer Data Base to determine whether the timing of ADT impacts survival. METHODS Men diagnosed with high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to a dose of 70-81 Gy along with ADT from 2004-2011 were included. Those who started ADT 42-90 days before EBRT were identified as having received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (N-HT) and those who received ADT from 14 days before their radiation until 84 days after the start of EBRT were categorized as receiving concurrent/adjuvant treatment (C-HT). We used the log-rank test to compare Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression to assess the impact of covariables on overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 11,491 included patients, those receiving N-HT were 1 year older (p<0.001) and more likely to have Gleason 8-10 disease (p = 0.01) and cT3-4 disease (p = 0.002). Men receiving N-HT had a 5-year and median OS of 80.6% and 111.4 months, respectively, compared to 78.3% and 108.9 months, respectively, in those receiving C-HT (p = 0.03). This benefit remained significant on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.96, p = 0.008). Duration of ADT was not available to report. CONCLUSIONS External beam radiation therapy with N-HT was associated with improved overall survival compared to C-HT. This study is hypothesis-generating and further studies are needed to best qualify the sequencing of hormone therapy with the duration of treatment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Riva G, Bassi C, Fodor C, Ciardo D, Cambria R, Pansini F, Zerini D, De Marco P, Cattani F, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R. High-Risk Prostate Cancer and Radiotherapy: The Past and the Future. A Benchmark for a New Mixed Beam Radiotherapy Approach. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:376-383. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Revised: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
11
|
Choong ES, Hruby G, Yang J, Kwong C, Patanjali N. 78Gy with Fiducial Marker Image-Guided Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Single Center Analysis of 301 Patients. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2016; 13:e356-e363. [PMID: 27863019 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2016] [Accepted: 09/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIM In prostate cancer, fiducial marker image-guided radiotherapy (FMIGRT) allows correction of setup errors and interfraction physiological motion resulting in improved accuracy of target and sparing of at risk organs. We aim to report outcomes and toxicities observed in patients treated with dose escalation to 78Gy with FMIGRT in our center. METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective review of consecutive patients with histologically confirmed T1-4N0M0 localized prostate cancer treated with dose escalation to 78Gy with FMIGRT in our center. All patients had 3-D conformal radiotherapy. Duration of androgen deprivation therapy use was tailored to risk group. Toxicity was scored according to CTCAE.v04. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), prostate cancer-specific survival and overall survival. RESULTS Median follow-up was 48.6 months. Median duration of androgen deprivation therapy was 6 and 23 months in the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. FFBF at 5 years was 88.8%. FFBFs when stratified to risk groups were 100% for low risk, 88.9% for low-intermediate risk, 89.9% for high-intermediate risk and 85.4% for high risk, respectively. Acute severe toxicity (grade≥3) rate for both genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) was 1%. Late moderate-to-severe toxicity (grade≥2) rates for GU and GI were 15% and 17%, respectively, with severe (grade≥3) toxicity rate for GU and GI at 2% and 3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Dose escalation to 78Gy with FMIGRT in our series achieved good FFBF at 5 years with low acute and late toxicity rates. These results provide a good comparator cohort to our current use of image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ee Siang Choong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jean Yang
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carol Kwong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nitya Patanjali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Francini E, Taplin ME. Prostate cancer: Developing novel approaches to castration-sensitive disease. Cancer 2016; 123:29-42. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Revised: 08/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Francini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Umberto I Hospital; University of Rome; Rome Italy
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gadia R, Teixeira Leite ET, Bierrenbach AL, Ynoe de Moraes F, Spratt DE, Arruda FF, Cintra Vita Abreu CE, Fernandes da Silva JL, de Andrade Carvalho H, Garicochea B. Long-term outcomes of dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy alone without androgen deprivation therapy for patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2016; 1:300-309. [PMID: 28740901 PMCID: PMC5514229 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2016] [Revised: 10/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to conventional radiation therapy improves overall survival (OS) in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. The benefit of ADT to added to dose-escalated radiotherapy is less clear. The aim of this study was to report disease control outcomes and to identify prognostic variables associated with favorable outcomes in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy without ADT. Methods and materials From September 2001 to March 2010, 127 patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer were treated with dose-escalated radiation otherapy without ADT. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), prostate cancer–specific mortality, and OS were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox regression modeling were performed. Results The median follow-up was 6.5 years, and the 5-year estimated bRFS, DMFS, prostate cancer–specific mortality, and OS for all patients was 89%, 96.1%, 98.4%, and 96.9% respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors that predict bRFS include risk group and PSA nadir, and factors that predict DMFS include perineural invasion, risk group, and PSA nadir. Conclusions Patients with favorable intermediate-risk cancer could likely be treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy without ADT. Patients with high-risk and unfavorable intermediate-risk cancer, perineural invasion, and PSA nadir ≥1ng/dL had worse outcomes and likely need distinct therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Gadia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
| | - Elton Trigo Teixeira Leite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Department of Radiology and Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Fabio Ynoe de Moraes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | - Heloisa de Andrade Carvalho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Department of Radiology and Oncology, Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Bernardo Garicochea
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bolla M, Maingon P, Carrie C, Villa S, Kitsios P, Poortmans PM, Sundar S, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Armstrong J, Bosset JF, Herrera FG, Pieters B, Slot A, Bahl A, Ben-Yosef R, Boehmer D, Scrase C, Renard L, Shash E, Coens C, van den Bergh AC, Collette L. Short Androgen Suppression and Radiation Dose Escalation for Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of EORTC Trial 22991. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1748-56. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.8055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Up to 30% of patients who undergo radiation for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer relapse biochemically within 5 years. We assessed if biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) is improved by adding 6 months of androgen suppression (AS; two injections of every-3-months depot of luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone agonist) to primary radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 819 patients staged: (1) cT1b-c, with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 10 ng/mL or Gleason ≥ 7, or (2) cT2a (International Union Against Cancer TNM 1997), with no involvement of pelvic lymph nodes and no clinical evidence of metastatic spread, with PSA ≤ 50 ng/mL, were centrally randomized 1:1 to either RT or RT plus AS started on day 1 of RT. Centers opted for one dose (70, 74, or 78 Gy). Biochemical DFS, the primary end point, was defined from entry until PSA relapse (Phoenix criteria) and clinical relapse by imaging or death of any cause. The trial had 80% power to detect hazard ratio (HR), 0.714 by intent-to-treat analysis stratified by dose of RT at the two-sided α = 5%. Results The median patient age was 70 years. Among patients, 74.8% were intermediate risk and 24.8% were high risk. In the RT arm, 407 of 409 patients received RT; in the RT plus AS arm, 403 patients received RT plus AS and three patients received RT only. At 7.2 years median follow-up, RT plus AS significantly improved biochemical DFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.66; P < .001, with 319 events), as well as clinical progression-free survival (205 events, HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.84; P = .001). In exploratory analysis, no statistically significant interaction between treatment effect and dose of RT could be evidenced (heterogeneity P = .79 and P = .66, for biochemical DFS and progression-free survival, respectively). Overall survival data are not mature yet. Conclusion Six months of concomitant and adjuvant AS improves biochemical and clinical DFS of intermediate- and high-risk cT1b-c to cT2a (with no involvement of pelvic lymph nodes and no clinical evidence of metastatic spread) prostatic carcinoma, treated by radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Bolla
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Christian Carrie
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Salvador Villa
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Petros Kitsios
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Philip M.P. Poortmans
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Santhanam Sundar
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Elzbieta M. van der Steen-Banasik
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - John Armstrong
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Jean-François Bosset
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Fernanda G. Herrera
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Bradley Pieters
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Annerie Slot
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Amit Bahl
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Rahamim Ben-Yosef
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Christopher Scrase
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Laurette Renard
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Emad Shash
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Corneel Coens
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Alphonsus C.M. van den Bergh
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| | - Laurence Collette
- Michel Bolla, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble; Philippe Maingon, Georges-Francois-Leclerc Centre, Dijon; Christian Carrie, Leon Bérard Center, Lyon; Jean-François Bosset, University Hospital of Besancon–Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France; Salvador Villa, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Petros Kitsios, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; Philip M.P. Poortmans, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Elzbieta M. van der
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bellefqih S, Hadadi K, Mezouri I, Maghous A, Marnouche E, Andaloussi K, Elmarjany M, Sifat H, Mansouri H, Benjaafar N. Association de radiothérapie et d’hormonothérapie dans la prise en charge des cancers localisés de la prostate : où en est-on ? Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:141-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
16
|
Survival outcomes of radiotherapy with or without androgen-deprivation therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer using the National Cancer Data Base. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:165.e1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2015] [Revised: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
17
|
Pollack A, Abramowitz MC. Weighing the Addition of Androgen Suppression Therapy to Radiotherapy Dose Escalation for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1715-7. [PMID: 26976421 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.66.2320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Pollack
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Amini A, Jones BL, Jackson MW, Rusthoven CG, Maroni P, Kavanagh BD, Raben D. Survival outcomes of combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy vs. brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients using the National Cancer Data Base. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:136-46. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Revised: 11/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
19
|
Amini A, Kavanagh BD, Rusthoven CG. Improved survival with the addition of radiotherapy to androgen deprivation: questions answered and a review of current controversies in radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2016; 4:14. [PMID: 26855950 PMCID: PMC4716946 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.10.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Accepted: 09/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
The contemporary standard of care for locally advanced high-risk prostate cancer includes a combination of dose-escalated radiotherapy (RT) plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). However, 20 years ago, at the inception of the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) led study (NCIC Clinical Trials Group PR.3/Medical Research Council PR07/Intergroup T94-0110), the survival impact of prostate RT for high-risk disease was uncertain. Recently, Mason, Warde and colleagues presented the final results of this NCIC/MRC study (PMID: 25691677) randomizing 1,205 high-risk prostate cancer patients to ADT + RT vs. ADT alone. These updated results confirm substantial improvements with the addition of RT to ADT for the endpoints of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and biochemical recurrence. Close examination of subtleties of this trial's design highlight some of the most salient controversies in the field of prostate RT, including the risk-stratified roles of ADT, optimal ADT duration, and RT field design in the dose-escalated and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Brian D Kavanagh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Voog JC, Paulus R, Efstathiou JA. Reply from Authors re: Ronald C. Chen. Decisions Regarding Whether to Use Androgen Deprivation Therapy with Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is Cardiovascular Mortality the Most Relevant Outcome? Eur Urol 2016;69:211-2: Outcomes for Favorable and Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy With or Without Short-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Eur Urol 2015; 69:212-3. [PMID: 26443430 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca Paulus
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Amini A, Jones BL, Yeh N, Rusthoven CG, Armstrong H, Kavanagh BD. Survival Outcomes of Whole-Pelvic Versus Prostate-Only Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients With Use of the National Cancer Data Base. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:1052-63. [PMID: 26581142 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2015] [Revised: 08/25/2015] [Accepted: 09/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES The addition of whole pelvic (WP) compared with prostate-only (PO) radiation therapy (RT) for clinically node-negative prostate cancer remains controversial. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the survival benefit of adding WPRT versus PO-RT for high-risk, node-negative prostate cancer, using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated from 2004 to 2006, with available data for RT volume, coded as prostate and pelvis (WPRT) or prostate alone (PO-RT) were included. Multivariate analysis (MVA) and propensity-score matched analysis (PSM) were performed. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) based on overall survival (OS) using Gleason score (GS), T stage, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was also conducted. RESULTS A total of 14,817 patients were included: 7606 (51.3%) received WPRT, and 7211 (48.7%) received PO-RT. The median follow-up time was 81 months (range, 2-122 months). Under MVA, the addition of WPRT for high-risk patients had no OS benefit compared with PO-RT (HR 1.05; P=.100). On subset analysis, patients receiving dose-escalated RT also did not benefit from WPRT (HR 1.01; P=.908). PSM confirmed no survival benefit with the addition of WPRT for high-risk patients (HR 1.05; P=.141). In addition, RPA was unable to demonstrate a survival benefit of WPRT for any subset. Other prognostic factors for inferior OS under MVA included older age (HR 1.25; P<.001), increasing comorbidity scores (HR 1.46; P<.001), higher T stage (HR 1.17; P<.001), PSA (HR 1.81; P<.001), and GS (HR 1.29; P<.001), and decreasing median county household income (HR 1.15; P=.011). Factors improving OS included the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (HR 0.92; P=.033), combination external beam RT plus brachytherapy boost (HR 0.71; P<.001), and treatment at an academic/research institution (HR 0.84; P=.002). CONCLUSION In the largest reported analysis of WPRT for patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated in the dose-escalated era, the addition of WPRT demonstrated no survival advantage compared with PO-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Bernard L Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Norman Yeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Hirotatsu Armstrong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Brian D Kavanagh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Locke JA, Dal Pra A, Supiot S, Warde P, Bristow RG. Synergistic action of image-guided radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Nat Rev Urol 2015; 12:193-204. [PMID: 25800395 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The combined use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) can improve overall survival in aggressive, localized prostate cancer. However, owing to the adverse effects of prolonged ADT, it is imperative to identify the patients who would benefit from this combined-modality therapy relative to the use of IGRT alone. Opportunities exist for more personalized approaches in treating aggressive, locally advanced prostate cancer. Biomarkers--such as disseminated tumour cells, circulating tumour cells, genomic signatures and molecular imaging techniques--could identify the patients who are at greatest risk for systemic metastases and who would benefit from the addition of systemic ADT. By contrast, when biomarkers of systemic disease are not present, treatment could proceed using local IGRT alone. The choice of drug, treatment duration and timing of ADT relative to IGRT could be predicated on these personalized approaches to prostate cancer medicine. These novel treatment intensification and reduction strategies could result in improved prostate-cancer-specific survival and overall survival, without incurring the added expense of metabolic syndrome and other adverse effects of ADT in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Locke
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Gordon &Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Level 6, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 4, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-St-Herblain, 8 quai Moncousu, BP 70721, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - Padraig Warde
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Weller MA, Kupelian PA, Reddy CA, Stephans KL, Tendulkar RD. Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant androgen deprivation with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: does sequencing matter? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2014; 13:e183-9. [PMID: 25660127 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2014] [Revised: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is typically provided neoadjuvantly and concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) in the management of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Our objective was to compare outcomes between patients who received adjuvant ADT (ADJ), ie, immediately after the completion of RT, to those who received a neoadjuvant and concurrent regimen (NEO). MATERIALS AND METHODS From 1995 to 2002, 515 patients with prostate cancer were definitively treated with RT and ADT. NEO was provided 2 to 3 months before the start of RT (n = 311). ADJ was initiated immediately after the completion of RT (n = 204). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the impact of ADT timing on outcomes. RESULTS Ten-year bRFS, DMFS, and OS rates were 61%, 80%, and 66%, respectively. Ten-year bRFS rates for ADJ versus NEO were 63% versus 60% (P = .98). Ten-year DMFS rates for ADJ versus NEO were both 80% (P = .60). Ten-year OS rates for ADJ versus NEO were 65% versus 67% (P = .98). CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in bRFS, DMFS, or OS between neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ADT in the setting of dose-escalated RT for localized prostate cancer. This suggests that the synergy between RT and androgen deprivation is independent of the sequencing of both modalities and that the initiation of RT does not need to be delayed for a course of neoadjuvant ADT.
Collapse
|
24
|
Crook J, Ots A, Gaztañaga M, Schmid M, Araujo C, Hilts M, Batchelar D, Parker B, Bachand F, Milette MP. Ultrasound-planned high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: Dose painting to the dominant intraprostatic lesion. Brachytherapy 2014; 13:433-41. [PMID: 24958556 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2014] [Accepted: 05/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
25
|
Wilcox SW, Aherne NJ, Benjamin LC, Wu B, de Campos Silva T, McLachlan CS, McKay MJ, Last AJ, Shakespeare TP. Long-term outcomes from dose-escalated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with androgen deprivation: encouraging results for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2014; 7:1519-23. [PMID: 25210465 PMCID: PMC4155897 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s65238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Dose-escalated (DE) radiotherapy in the setting of localized prostate cancer has been shown to improve biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in several studies. In the same group of patients, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been shown to confer a survival benefit when combined with radiotherapy doses of up to 70 Gy; however, there is currently little long-term data on patients who have received high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with ADT. We report the long-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients treated with the combination of DE image-guided IMRT (IG-IMRT) and ADT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with localized prostate cancer were identified from a centralized database across an integrated cancer center. All patients received DE IG-IMRT, combined with ADT, and had a minimum follow up of 12 months post-radiotherapy. All relapse and toxicity data were collected prospectively. Actuarial bDFS, metastasis-free survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and multivariate analyses were calculated using the SPSS v20.0 statistical package. RESULTS Seven hundred and eighty-two eligible patients were identified with a median follow up of 46 months. Overall, 4.3% of patients relapsed, 2.0% developed distant metastases, and 0.6% died from metastatic prostate cancer. At 5-years, bDFS was 88%, metastasis-free survival was 95%, and prostate cancer-specific survival was 98%. Five-year grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was 2.1% and 3.4%, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 late toxicities were reported. Pretreatment prostate specific antigen (P=0.001) and Gleason score (P=0.03) were significant in predicting biochemical failure on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION There is a high probability of tumor control with DE IG-IMRT combined with androgen deprivation, and this is a technique with a low probability of significant late toxicity. Our long term results corroborate the safety and efficacy of treating with IG-IMRT to high doses and compares favorably with published series for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shea W Wilcox
- North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia ; The University of New South Wales, Rural Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Noel J Aherne
- North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia ; The University of New South Wales, Rural Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Bosco Wu
- North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Craig S McLachlan
- The University of New South Wales, Rural Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael J McKay
- North Coast Cancer Institute, Lismore, NSW, Australia ; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J Last
- North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas P Shakespeare
- North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia ; North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia ; North Coast Cancer Institute, Lismore, NSW, Australia ; The University of New South Wales, Rural Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
A New Risk Classification System for Therapeutic Decision Making with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Dose-escalated External-beam Radiation Therapy. Eur Urol 2013; 64:895-902. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 289] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2013] [Accepted: 03/08/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
27
|
Lam ET, Glodé LM. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Hormonal and Chemotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2013; 27:1189-204, viii. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2013.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
28
|
Long-term outcome for prostate cancer using pseudo pulse–dosed rate brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, and hormones. Brachytherapy 2013; 12:608-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2013] [Revised: 03/21/2013] [Accepted: 04/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
29
|
Riou O, Regnault de la Mothe P, Azria D, Aillères N, Dubois JB, Fenoglietto P. Simultaneous integrated boost plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole pelvis irradiation of locally advanced prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2013; 14:4094. [PMID: 23835376 PMCID: PMC5714536 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2012] [Revised: 02/27/2013] [Accepted: 02/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Concurrent radiotherapy to the pelvis plus a prostate boost with long-term androgen deprivation is a standard of care for locally advanced prostate cancer. IMRT has the ability to deliver highly conformal dose to the target while lowering irradiation of critical organs around the prostate. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy is able to reduce treatment time, but its impact on organ sparing is still controversial when compared to static gantry IMRT. We compared the two techniques in simultaneous integrated boost plans. Ten patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were included. The planning target volume (PTV) 1 was defined as the pelvic lymph nodes, the prostate, and the seminal vesicles plus setup margins. The PTV2 consisted of the prostate with setup margins. The prescribed doses to PTV1 and PTV2 were 54 Gy in 37 fractions and 74 Gy in 37 fractions, respectively. We compared simultaneous integrated boost plans by means of either a seven coplanar static split fields IMRT, or a one-arc (RA1) and a two-arc (RA2) RapidArc planning. All three techniques allowed acceptable homogeneity and PTV coverage. Static IMRT enabled a better homogeneity for PTV2 than RapidArc techniques. Sliding window IMRT and VMAT permitted to maintain doses to OAR within acceptable levels with a low risk of side effects for each organ. VMAT plans resulted in a clinically and statistically significant reduction in doses to bladder (mean dose IMRT: 50.1 ± 4.6Gy vs. mean dose RA2: 47.1 ± 3.9 Gy, p = 0.037), rectum (mean dose IMRT: 44± 4.5 vs. mean dose RA2: 41.6 ± 5.5 Gy, p = 0.006), and small bowel (V30 IMRT: 76.47 ± 14.91% vs. V30 RA2: 47.49 ± 16.91%, p = 0.002). Doses to femoral heads were higher with VMAT but within accepted constraints. Our findings suggest that simultaneous integrated boost plans using VMAT and sliding window IMRT allow good OAR sparing while maintaining PTV coverage within acceptable levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Riou
- Radiation Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Denham JW, Steigler A. Picking the Optimal Duration of Hormonal Therapy in Men With High-Risk and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2013; 23:206-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
31
|
Castle KO, Hoffman KE, Levy LB, Lee AK, Choi S, Nguyen QN, Frank SJ, Pugh TJ, McGuire SE, Kuban DA. Is Androgen Deprivation Therapy Necessary in All Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated in the Dose Escalation Era? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85:693-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2012] [Revised: 06/09/2012] [Accepted: 06/17/2012] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
32
|
Zumsteg ZS, Spratt DE, Pei X, Yamada Y, Kalikstein A, Kuk D, Zhang Z, Zelefsky MJ. Short-term androgen-deprivation therapy improves prostate cancer-specific mortality in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 85:1012-7. [PMID: 22981709 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2012] [Revised: 07/27/2012] [Accepted: 07/28/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the benefit of short-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC) receiving dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The present retrospective study comprised 710 intermediate-risk PC patients receiving external beam radiation therapy with doses of ≥81 Gy at a single institution from 1992 to 2005, including 357 patients receiving neoadjuvant and concurrent ADT. Prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival (PSA-RFS) and distant metastasis (DM) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. PC-specific mortality (PCSM) was assessed using competing-risks analysis. RESULTS The median follow-up was 7.9 years. Despite being more likely to have higher PSA levels, Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7, multiple National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate-risk factors, and older age (P≤.001 for all comparisons), patients receiving ADT had improved PSA-RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.598; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.435-0.841; P=.003), DM (HR, 0.424; 95% CI, 0.219-0.819; P=.011), and PCSM (HR, 0.380; 95% CI, 0.157-0.921; P=.032) on univariate analysis. Using multivariate analysis, ADT was an even stronger predictor of improved PSA-RFS (adjusted HR [AHR], 0.516; 95% CI, 0.360-0.739; P<.001), DM (AHR, 0.347; 95% CI, 0.176-0.685; P=.002), and PCSM (AHR, 0.297; 95% CI, 0.128-0.685; P=.004). Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 and ≥50% positive biopsy cores were other independent predictors of PCSM. CONCLUSIONS Short-term ADT improves PSA-RFS, DM, and PCSM in patients with intermediate-risk PC undergoing dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bian SX, Kuban DA, Levy LB, Oh J, Castle KO, Pugh TJ, Choi S, McGuire SE, Nguyen QN, Frank SJ, Nguyen PL, Lee AK, Hoffman KE. Addition of short-term androgen deprivation therapy to dose-escalated radiation therapy improves failure-free survival for select men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:2346-2352. [PMID: 22357249 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose-escalated (DE) radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improve prostate cancer outcomes over standard-dose RT. The benefit of adding ADT to DE-RT for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PrCa) is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified 636 men treated for IR-PrCa with DE-RT (>75Gy). The adult comorbidity evaluation-27 index classifed comorbidity. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests compared failure-free survival (FFS) with and without ADT. RESULTS Forty-five percent received DE-RT and 55% DE-RT with ADT (median 6 months). On Cox proportional hazard regression that adjusted for comorbidity and tumor characteristics, ADT improved FFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.36; P = 0.004). Recursive partitioning analysis of men without ADT classified Gleason 4 + 3 = 7 or ≥50% positive cores as unfavorable disease. The addition of ADT to DE-RT improved 5-year FFS for men with unfavorable disease (81.6% versus 92.9%; P = 0.009) but did not improve FFS for men with favorable disease (96.3% versus 97.4%; P = 0.874). When stratified by comorbidity, ADT improved FFS for men with unfavorable disease and no or mild comorbidity (P = 0.006) but did not improve FFS for men with unfavorable disease and moderate or severe comorbidity (P = 0.380). CONCLUSION The addition of ADT to DE-RT improves FFS for men with unfavorable IR-PrCa, especially those with no or minimal comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S X Bian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - D A Kuban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - L B Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - J Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - K O Castle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - T J Pugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - S Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - S E McGuire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Q N Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - S J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - P L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - A K Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - K E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
High-Dose Radiotherapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Cancer Control and Toxicity Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83:1473-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2011] [Revised: 08/16/2011] [Accepted: 10/13/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
35
|
Association hormonothérapie et radiothérapie dans le cancer de prostate localement avancé. Bull Cancer 2012; 99 Suppl 1:S30-6. [DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2012.1567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
36
|
Zumsteg ZS, Zelefsky MJ. Short-term androgen deprivation therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer undergoing dose-escalated radiotherapy: the standard of care? Lancet Oncol 2012; 13:e259-69. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70084-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
37
|
Smith MJ, Akhtar NH, Tagawa ST. The current role of androgen deprivation in patients undergoing dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer 2012; 2012:280278. [PMID: 22619727 PMCID: PMC3348643 DOI: 10.1155/2012/280278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2011] [Revised: 01/04/2012] [Accepted: 01/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose. To review existing literature on the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with dose escalated radiation therapy. Methods and Materials. A PubMed search was undertaken to identify relevant articles. Results. Multiple recent studies were identified examining the role of ADT in the current era of radiation dose-escalation. Among the reviewed studies, varying radiation doses and techniques, ADT regimens, and patient selection criteria were utilized. Conflicting results were reported, with some studies demonstrating a benefit of delivering a higher radiation dose with ADT. Other studies failed to show significant benefits with the addition of ADT to dose-escalated RT. Conclusions. The benefit of adding ADT to dose-escalated RT is still uncertain. Prospective randomized trials, several of which are ongoing, are necessary to more adequately examine this issue. In the interim, physicians and patients should continue to utilize the existing data to weigh the risks and benefits of each approach to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stitch Radiation Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, P.O. Box 575, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Naveed H. Akhtar
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Scott T. Tagawa
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ishikawa H, Tsuji H, Kamada T, Akakura K, Suzuki H, Shimazaki J, Tsujii H. Carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2012; 19:296-305. [PMID: 22320843 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02961.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
In 1994, carbon-ion radiotherapy was started at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences using the Heavy-Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba. Between June 1995 and March 2000, two phase I/II dose escalation studies (protocols 9402 and 9703) of hypofractionated carbon-ion radiotherapy for both early- and advance-stage prostate cancer patients had been carried out to establish radiotherapy technique and to determine the optimal radiation dose. To validate the feasibility and efficacy of hypofractionated carbon-ion radiotherapy, a phase II study (9904) was initiated in April 2000 using the shrinking field technique and the recommended dose fractionation (66 gray equivalents in 20 fractions over 5 weeks) obtained from the phase I/II studies, and was successfully completed in October 2003. The data from 175 patients in the phase II study showed the importance of an appropriate use of androgen deprivation therapy according to tumor risk group. Since November 2003, carbon-ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer was approved as "Highly Advanced Medical Technology" from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, and since then approximately 1100 patients have received carbon-ion radiotherapy as of July 2011. In this review, we introduce our steps thorough three clinical trials carried out at National Institute of Radiological Sciences, and show the updated data of carbon-ion radiotherapy obtained from approximately 1000 prostate cancer patients. In addition, our recent challenge and future direction will be also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitoshi Ishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba University Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Créhange G, Bolla M, Maingon P. Radiotherapy and androgen deprivation for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:1354; author reply 1354-5. [PMID: 21991967 DOI: 10.1056/nejmc1109225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
40
|
Wang T, Languino LR, Lian J, Stein G, Blute M, Fitzgerald TJ. Molecular targets for radiation oncology in prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2011; 1:17. [PMID: 22645712 PMCID: PMC3355820 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2011.00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2011] [Accepted: 06/27/2011] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent selected developments of the molecular science of prostate cancer (PrCa) biology and radiation oncology are reviewed. We present potential targets for molecular integration treatment strategies with radiation therapy (RT), and highlight potential strategies for molecular treatment in combination with RT for patient care. We provide a synopsis of the information to date regarding molecular biology of PrCa, and potential integrated research strategy for improved treatment of PrCa. Many patients with early-stage disease at presentation can be treated effectively with androgen ablation treatment, surgery, or RT. However, a significant portion of men are diagnosed with advanced stage/high-risk disease and these patients progress despite curative therapeutic intervention. Unfortunately, management options for these patients are limited and are not always successful including treatment for hormone refractory disease. In this review, we focus on molecules of extracellular matrix component, apoptosis, androgen receptor, RUNX, and DNA methylation. Expanding our knowledge of the molecular biology of PrCa will permit the development of novel treatment strategies integrated with RT to improve patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|