1
|
Tatekawa S, Hoshino S, Takemoto N, Oda M, Akino Y, Iwahori K, Hirata T, Hayashi K, Tamari K, Seo Y, Isohashi F, Shimizu S, Ogawa K. COVID-19 vaccine-induced recurrence of the radiation recall phenomenon in the laryngeal mucosa due to a VEGF inhibitor. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:101048. [PMID: 35992570 PMCID: PMC9376028 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The radiation recall phenomenon (RRP) is a rare and unexpected late complication of radiation therapy (RT). Although predominantly in the skin, RRP of the upper respiratory tract has also been reported. In general, RRP is caused by anticancer agents, and the COVID-19 vaccine has also been reported to cause RRP in recent years. Methods and Materials A 50-year-old woman who had received RT around the larynx 3 years prior and was receiving a docetaxel + ramucirumab (RAM) regimen experienced recurrent sore throat. The administration of RAM was discontinued after a gastroscopic examination revealed mucosal bleeding from around the larynx, which was thought to be RRP caused by RAM, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor. Results After the remission of the RRP, the patient received a COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Five days later, the appearance of cough and recurrence of sore throat worsened with time, and marked stridor was observed. The patient was admitted, and steroid pulse therapy was administered for 3 days starting on day 18 after vaccination. On day 50 after vaccination, edema of the vocal cords improved. Conclusions When administering COVID-19 vaccines, considering that these vaccines may cause RRP is important, because RRP can be fatal in patients with a history of RT in the laryngeal region and treated with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shotaro Tatekawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- Corresponding author: Shotaro Tatekawa, MD, PhD
| | - Shigenori Hoshino
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saito Yukoukai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norihiko Takemoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saito Yukoukai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Michio Oda
- Department of Medical Technology, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichi Akino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kota Iwahori
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takero Hirata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Hayashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keisuke Tamari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuji Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Isohashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suto H, Okano K, Oshima M, Ando Y, Matsukawa H, Takahashi S, Shibata T, Kamada H, Kobara H, Tsuji A, Masaki T, Suzuki Y. Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Administered for 5 Versus 2 Weeks for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 2022; 51:269-277. [PMID: 35584385 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Indications of preoperative treatment for resectable (R-) or borderline resectable (BR-) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are unclear, and the protocol remains to be standardized. METHODS Included 65 patients with R- and BR-PDAC with venous involvement (V-) received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and 50 Gy of radiation as the 5-week regimen. The outcomes of this group were compared with those of 52 patients who underwent S-1 and 30 Gy of radiation as the 2-week regimen, previously collected as our prospective phase II study. RESULTS Compared with the 2-week regimen, there were no significant differences in the rate of protocol completion, adverse events, mortality and morbidity, or R0 resection in the 5-week regimen. In subgroup analyses of R-PDAC, there were no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the groups. In contrast, the 5-week regimen had significantly better overall survival and recurrence-free survival than the 2-week regimen for BRV-PDAC. Similar results were observed after propensity score matching analysis. CONCLUSIONS The 5-week regimen of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has good clinical efficacy and safety for R- and BRV-PDAC. The 5-week regimen could achieve better outcomes than the 2-week regimen for BRV-PDAC. In contrast, both regimens achieved similar outcomes for R-PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Akihito Tsuji
- Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gouveia AG, Chan DCW, Hoskin PJ, Marta GN, Trippa F, Maranzano E, Chow E, Silva MF. Advances in radiotherapy in bone metastases in the context of new target therapies and ablative alternatives: A critical review. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:55-67. [PMID: 34333087 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In patients with bone metastases (BM), radiotherapy (RT) is used to alleviate symptoms, reduce the risk of fracture, and improve quality of life (QoL). However, with the emergence of concepts like oligometastases, minimal invasive surgery, ablative therapies such as stereotactic ablative RT (SABR), radiosurgery (SRS), thermal ablation, and new systemic anticancer therapies, there have been a paradigm shift in the multidisciplinary approach to BM with the aim of preserving mobility and function survival. Despite guidelines on using single-dose RT in uncomplicated BM, its use remains relatively low. In uncomplicated BM, single-fraction RT produces similar overall and complete response rates to RT with multiple fractions, although it is associated with a higher retreatment rate of 20% versus 8%. Complicated BM can be characterised as the presence of impending or existing pathologic fracture, a major soft tissue component, existing spinal cord or cauda equina compression and neuropathic pain. The rate of complicated BM is around 35%. Unfortunately, there is a lack of prospective trials on RT in complicated BM and the best dose/fractionation regimen is not yet established. There are contradictory outcomes in studies reporting BM pain control rates and time to pain reduction when comparing SABR with Conventional RT. While some studies showed that SABR produces a faster reduction in pain and higher pain control rates than conventional RT, other studies did not show differences. Moreover, the local control rate for BM treated with SABR is higher than 80% in most studies, and the rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity is very low. The use of SABR may be preferred in three circumstances: reirradiation, oligometastatic disease, and radioresistant tumours. Local ablative therapies like SABR can delay change or use of systemic therapy, preserve patients' Qol, and improve disease-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, despite the potential benefit of SABR in oligometastatic disease, there is a need to establish the optial indication, RT dose fractionation, prognostic factors and optimal timing in combination with systemic therapies for SABR. This review evaluates the role of RT in BM considering these recent treatment advances. We consider the definition of complicated BM, use of single and multiple fractions RT for both complicated and uncomplicated BM, reirradiation, new treatment paradigms including local ablative treatments, oligometastatic disease, systemic therapy, physical activity and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André G Gouveia
- Radiation Oncology Department, Américas Centro de Oncologia Integrado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
| | - Dominic C W Chan
- Department of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Peter J Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom; Radiation Oncology Department, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gustavo N Marta
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Radiation Oncology Center, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | - Edward Chow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Mauricio F Silva
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Federal University, Santa Maria, Brazil; Clínica de Radioterapia de Santa Maria, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arias-Pinilla GA, Modjtahedi H. Therapeutic Application of Monoclonal Antibodies in Pancreatic Cancer: Advances, Challenges and Future Opportunities. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081781. [PMID: 33917882 PMCID: PMC8068268 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains as one of the most aggressive cancer types. In the absence of reliable biomarkers for its early detection and more effective therapeutic interventions, pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer death in the Western world in the next decade. Therefore, it is essential to discover novel therapeutic targets and to develop more effective and pancreatic cancer-specific therapeutic agents. To date, 45 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been approved for the treatment of patients with a wide range of cancers; however, none has yet been approved for pancreatic cancer. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the FDA approved anticancer mAb-based drugs, the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials with mAbs in pancreatic cancer and the factors contributing to the poor response to antibody therapy (e.g. tumour heterogeneity, desmoplastic stroma). MAb technology is an excellent tool for studying the complex biology of pancreatic cancer, to discover novel therapeutic targets and to develop various forms of antibody-based therapeutic agents and companion diagnostic tests for the selection of patients who are more likely to benefit from such therapy. These should result in the approval and routine use of antibody-based agents for the treatment of pancreatic cancer patients in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo A. Arias-Pinilla
- Department of Oncology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK;
- School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey KT1 2EE, UK
| | - Helmout Modjtahedi
- School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey KT1 2EE, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-02084-172240
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim N, Choi SH, Chang JS, Kim YT, Kim SW, Kim GM, Kim YB. Use of bevacizumab before or after radiotherapy increases the risk of fistula formation in patients with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:59-65. [PMID: 33273018 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several reports have documented the risk of fistula formation after bevacizumab in patients previously treated with radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of fistula formation with bevacizumab and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage I-IV cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients who had a history of pelvic radiotherapy, who were treated with intracavitary brachytherapy alone, received radiotherapy at another hospital, received concurrent bevacizumab and radiotherapy, or had missing follow-up data or a short follow-up period (<6 months) were excluded. The fistula rates were compared between the groups using the Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score analyses. RESULTS A total of 302 patients were included in the study: 249 patients were treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy, and 53 patients were treated with radiotherapy before or after bevacizumab. With a median follow-up of 35.9 (IQR 22.8-53.5) months, the 3 year cumulative fistula incidence rate was significantly higher in the radiotherapy + bevacizumab group than in the radiotherapy group (27.0% vs 3.0%, p<0.001). Bevacizumab administration was significantly associated with fistula formation in the multivariable adjusted model (HR 4.76, 95% CI 1.71 to 13.23) and three propensity score adjusted model (all p<0.05). Biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions for 2 cc of the rectum more than 76 Gy was also associated with fistula formation (HR 4.30, 95% CI 1.52 to 12.18). Additionally, a 10 month interval between radiotherapy and bevacizumab reduced the incidence of fistula formation in the radiotherapy + bevacizumab group (p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS In patients with cervical cancer treated with pelvic radiotherapy, the addition of bevacizumab substantially increased the risk of fistula formation. Physicians should perform pelvic radiotherapy in combination with bevacizumab with caution; moreover, close monitoring for fistula formation is warranted in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalee Kim
- Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Seo Hee Choi
- Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Young-Tae Kim
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Sang Wun Kim
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Gun Min Kim
- Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Versteijne E, Suker M, Groothuis K, Akkermans-Vogelaar JM, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Buijsen J, Busch OR, Creemers GJM, van Dam RM, Eskens FALM, Festen S, de Groot JWB, Groot Koerkamp B, de Hingh IH, Homs MYV, van Hooft JE, Kerver ED, Luelmo SAC, Neelis KJ, Nuyttens J, Paardekooper GMRM, Patijn GA, van der Sangen MJC, de Vos-Geelen J, Wilmink JW, Zwinderman AH, Punt CJ, van Eijck CH, van Tienhoven G. Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:1763-1773. [PMID: 32105518 PMCID: PMC8265386 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 598] [Impact Index Per Article: 149.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may improve the radical resection rate for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, but the overall benefit is unproven. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized phase III trial in 16 centers, patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy, which consisted of 3 courses of gemcitabine, the second combined with 15 × 2.4 Gy radiotherapy, followed by surgery and 4 courses of adjuvant gemcitabine or to immediate surgery and 6 courses of adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary end point was overall survival by intention to treat. RESULTS Between April 2013 and July 2017, 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned; 119 were assigned to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 127 to immediate surgery. Median overall survival by intention to treat was 16.0 months with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 14.3 months with immediate surgery (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.05; P = .096). The resection rate was 61% and 72% (P = .058). The R0 resection rate was 71% (51 of 72) in patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 40% (37 of 92) in patients assigned to immediate surgery (P < .001). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with significantly better disease-free survival and locoregional failure-free interval as well as with significantly lower rates of pathologic lymph nodes, perineural invasion, and venous invasion. Survival analysis of patients who underwent tumor resection and started adjuvant chemotherapy showed improved survival with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (35.2 v 19.8 months; P = .029). The proportion of patients who suffered serious adverse events was 52% versus 41% (P = .096). CONCLUSION Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer did not show a significant overall survival benefit. Although the outcomes of the secondary end points and predefined subgroup analyses suggest an advantage of the neoadjuvant approach, additional evidence is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Versteijne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mustafa Suker
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Groothuis
- Clinical Research Department, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands (IKNL), Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Janine M Akkermans-Vogelaar
- Clinical Research Department, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands (IKNL), Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Buijsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary & Oncology, European Surgery Center Aachen Maastricht, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ferry A L M Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Festen
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emile D Kerver
- Department of Medical Oncology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia A C Luelmo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Karen J Neelis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aeilko H Zwinderman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched to identify relevant original articles investigating neoadjuvant therapy in resectable PDAC. Qualitative analyses were performed to investigate patient selection, disease stage, impact on perioperative outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Forty-three studies met inclusion criteria for this review. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upfront resectable PDAC is cost-effective, safe, may result in lower stage disease and has potential survival advantages. With proper patient selection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an appropriate approach for upfront resectable PDAC. Nevertheless, the risk for disease progression and losing a curative surgical window highlights the need for appropriate patient identification, further discovery of superior biomarkers or molecular profiles representative of positive treatment response, and additional prospective comparative study.
Collapse
|
8
|
Toxicity of locoregional radiotherapy in combination with bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer (TOLERAB): Final long-term evaluation. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0221816. [PMID: 31469859 PMCID: PMC6716668 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Few data are available concerning the safety of bevacizumab (B) in combination with locoregional radiation therapy (RT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the 5-year late toxicity of concurrent B and RT in non-metastatic breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicentre prospective study included non-metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in phase 3 clinical trials evaluating B with concurrent RT versus RT alone. All patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and normofractionated breast or chest wall RT, with or without regional lymph node RT. B was administered at an equivalent dose of 5 mg/kg once a week for 1 year. The safety profile was evaluated 1, 3 and 5 years after completion of radiotherapy. RESULTS A total of 64 patients were included between November 2007 and April 2010. Median follow-up was 60 months (12-73) and 5-year late toxicity data were available for 46 patients. The majority of tumours were triple-negative (68.8%), tumour size <2cm (41.3%) with negative nodal status (50.8%). Median total dose of B was 15,000mg and median duration was 11.2 months. No grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. Only 8 patients experienced grade 1-2 toxicities: n = 3 (6.5%) grade 1 lymphedema, n = 2 (4.3%) grade 1 pain, n = 1 (2.2%) grade 2 lymphedema, n = 1 (2.2%) grade 1 fibrosis. Five-year overall survival was 93.8%, disease-free survival was 89% and locoregional recurrence-free survival was 93.1%. CONCLUSION Concurrent B and locoregional RT are associated with acceptable 5-year toxicity in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. No grade ≥3 toxicity was observed.
Collapse
|
9
|
van Mackelenbergh MG, Stroes CI, Spijker R, van Eijck CHJ, Wilmink JW, Bijlsma MF, van Laarhoven HWM. Clinical Trials Targeting the Stroma in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E588. [PMID: 31035512 PMCID: PMC6562438 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11050588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Revised: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment plays an important role in the initiation and progression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this systematic review, we provide an overview of clinical trials with stroma-targeting agents. We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed and the EMBASE database, using the PRISMA guidelines, for eligible clinical trials. In total, 2330 records were screened, from which we have included 106 articles. A meta-analysis could be performed on 51 articles which describe the targeting of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, and three articles which describe the targeting of hyaluronic acid. Anti-VEGF therapies did not show an increase in median overall survival (OS) with combined hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.13). Treatment with hyaluronidase PEGPH20 showed promising results, but, thus far, only in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in selected patients with hyaluronic acid (HA)high tumors: An increase in median progression free survival (PFS) of 2.9 months, as well as a HR of 0.51 (95% CI 0.26-1.00). In conclusion, we found that anti-angiogenic therapies did not show an increased benefit in median OS or PFS in contrast to promising results with anti-hyaluronic acid treatment in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. The PEGPH20 clinical trials used patient selection to determine eligibility based on tumor biology, which underlines the importance to personalize treatment for pancreatic cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelaine G van Mackelenbergh
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlotte I Stroes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - René Spijker
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bradley A, Van Der Meer R. Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: A Markov decision analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212805. [PMID: 30817807 PMCID: PMC6394923 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. In the absence of large randomized controlled trials offering a direct comparison, this study aims to use Markov decision analysis to compare efficacy of traditional surgery first (SF) and neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) pathways for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Methods An advanced Markov decision analysis model was constructed to compare SF and NAT pathways for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Transition probabilities were calculated from randomized control and Phase II/III trials after comprehensive literature search. Utility outcomes were measured in overall and quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) on an intention-to-treat basis as the primary outcome. Markov cohort analysis of treatment received was the secondary outcome. Model uncertainties were tested with one and two-way deterministic and probabilistic Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis. Results SF gave 23.72 months (18.51 QALMs) versus 20.22 months (16.26 QALMs). Markov Cohort Analysis showed that where all treatment modalities were received NAT gave 35.05 months (29.87 QALMs) versus 30.96 months (24.86QALMs) for R0 resection and 34.08 months (29.87 QALMs) versus 25.85 months (20.72 QALMs) for R1 resection. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that NAT was superior if the resection rate was greater than 51.04% or below 75.68% in SF pathway. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that pathway superiority depended on obtaining multimodal treatment in either pathway. Conclusion Whilst NAT is a viable alternative to traditional SF approach, superior pathway selection depends on the individual patient’s likelihood of receiving multimodal treatment in either pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Bradley
- Department of Management Science, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
- West of Scotland Pancreatic Cancer Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Robert Van Der Meer
- Department of Management Science, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wolfe AR, Williams TM. Altering the response to radiation: radiosensitizers and targeted therapies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preclinical and emerging clinical evidence. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 1. [PMID: 32656528 DOI: 10.21037/apc.2018.08.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy continues to have an evolving role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. While metastatic failure likely contributes to the majority of patient mortality, achieving local control through surgery and/or radiation appears to be important as certain studies suggest that mortality is contributed by local failure. Many studies support that pancreatic cancer is a relatively radiation resistant tumor type. In addition, the ability to further improve radiation through dose escalation strategies in the non-metastatic setting is hampered by closeness of normal organs, including small bowel and stomach, to the tumor. Thus subverting molecular pathways that promote radiation resistance will be critical to further success of radiation in this disease. There is a wealth of preclinical data supporting the targeting of various molecular pathways in combination with radiation therapy, including DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint proteins, receptor tyrosine kinases, oncoproteins, stem cells, and immunomodulation. A number of clinical trials have been completed or are on-going with novel molecular inhibitors. In this review, we summarize existing preclinical and clinical molecular strategies for improving the efficacy of radiation in pancreatic cancer, and highlight recent and ongoing clinical trials combining radiation and various targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam R Wolfe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Terence M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Versteijne E, Vogel JA, Besselink MG, Busch ORC, Wilmink JW, Daams JG, van Eijck CHJ, Groot Koerkamp B, Rasch CRN, van Tienhoven G. Meta-analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2018; 105:946-958. [PMID: 29708592 PMCID: PMC6033157 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 340] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Studies comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer may report only patients who underwent resection and so survival will be skewed. The aim of this study was to report survival by intention to treat in a comparison of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Methods MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival by intention to treat in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with or without neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included overall and R0 resection rate, pathological lymph node rate, reasons for unresectability and toxicity of neoadjuvant treatment. Results In total, 38 studies were included with 3484 patients, of whom 1738 (49·9 per cent) had neoadjuvant treatment. The weighted median overall survival by intention to treat was 18·8 months for neoadjuvant treatment and 14·8 months for upfront surgery; the difference was larger among patients whose tumours were resected (26·1 versus 15·0 months respectively). The overall resection rate was lower with neoadjuvant treatment than with upfront surgery (66·0 versus 81·3 per cent; P < 0·001), but the R0 rate was higher (86·8 (95 per cent c.i. 84·6 to 88·7) versus 66·9 (64·2 to 69·6) per cent; P < 0·001). Reported by intention to treat, the R0 rates were 58·0 and 54·9 per cent respectively (P = 0·088). The pathological lymph node rate was 43·8 per cent after neoadjuvant therapy and 64·8 per cent in the upfront surgery group (P < 0·001). Toxicity of at least grade III was reported in up to 64 per cent of the patients. Conclusion Neoadjuvant treatment appears to improve overall survival by intention to treat, despite lower overall resection rates for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016049374. Improved survival with neoadjuvant treatment
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Versteijne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J A Vogel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J G Daams
- Medical Library, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dautruche A, Belin L, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, de la Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Lévy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Denis F, Gobillion A, Pernin V, Kirova Y. Evaluation at 3 years of concurrent bevacizumab and radiotherapy for breast cancer: Results of a prospective study. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:222-228. [PMID: 29650388 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the 3 years late toxicity among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who received concurrent bevacizumab and locoregional radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a single-arm, multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant concomitant association of bevacizumab and radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Toxicity was assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 during the radiotherapy and follow-up clinics at 12 and 36 months after its completion. The study was designed to evaluate the toxicity at one year, 3 years and 5 years. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were included from October 2007 to August 2010. All of them received concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and bevacizumab (in 24 cases after primary systemic treatment). All patients received non-fractionated radiotherapy to breast or chest wall with or without irradiation of regional lymph nodes. Early toxicity has been previously reported. Median follow-up was 46.4 months (range: 18-77 months). Median age was 53 years old (range: 23-68 years). The 3-years overall survival was 93% (range: 87-100%). Evaluation of the toxicity at 3 years was available for 67% of the patients. There was a low rate of toxicity: 14% grade 1 pain, 9% grade 1 fibrosis, 2% grade 1 telangiectasia, 2% grade 1 paresis, 7% grade 1 lymphedema and 2% grade 3 lymphedema. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. No patient had a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional radiotherapy is associated with acceptable 3-years toxicity in patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dautruche
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - L Belin
- Biostatistics department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P Cottu
- Oncology department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P Bontemps
- Radiotherapy department, CHU Jean-Minjoz, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - C Lemanski
- Radiotherapy department, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - B de la Lande
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, René-Huguenin hospital, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - P Baumann
- Radiotherapy department, centre d'oncologie de Gentilly, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - F Missohou
- Radiotherapy department, centre Henri-Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - C Lévy
- Radiotherapy department, centre François-Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| | - K Peignaux
- Radiotherapy department, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 21079 Dijon, France
| | | | - F Denis
- Radiotherapy department, centre Jean-Bernard, 72000 Le Mans, France
| | - A Gobillion
- Biostatistics department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - V Pernin
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dhir M, Malhotra GK, Sohal DP, Hein NA, Smith LM, O’Reilly EM, Bahary N, Are C. Neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5520 patients. World J Surg Oncol 2017; 15:183. [PMID: 29017581 PMCID: PMC5634869 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1240-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent years have seen standardization of the anatomic definitions of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and increasing utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The aim of the current review was to summarize the evidence for NAT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma since 2009, when consensus criteria for resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and locally advanced (LA) disease were endorsed. METHODS PubMed search was undertaken along with extensive backward search of the references of published articles to identify studies utilizing NAT for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abstracts from ASCO-GI 2014 and 2015 were also searched. RESULTS A total of 96 studies including 5520 patients were included in the final quantitative synthesis. Pooled estimates revealed 36% grade ≥ 3 toxicities, 5% biliary complications, 21% hospitalization rate and low mortality (0%, range 0-16%) during NAT. The majority of patients (59%) had stable disease. On an intention-to-treat basis, R0-resection rates varied from 63% among R patients to 23% among LA patients. R0 rates were > 80% among all patients who were resected after NAT. Among R and BR patients who underwent resection after NAT, median OS was 30 and 27.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The current study summarizes the recent literature for NAT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and demonstrates improving outcomes after NAT compared to those historically associated with a surgery-first approach for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mashaal Dhir
- Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
| | - Gautam K. Malhotra
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 98198 USA
| | - Davendra P.S. Sohal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| | - Nicholas A. Hein
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
| | - Lynette M. Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
| | - Eileen M. O’Reilly
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
| | - Chandrakanth Are
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 98198 USA
- Department of Surgery/Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dohopolski MJ, Glaser SM, Vargo JA, Balasubramani GK, Beriwal S. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally-advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer-patterns of care and overall survival. J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 8:766-777. [PMID: 29184680 PMCID: PMC5674248 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.08.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unresectable pancreatic cancer remains a challenging disease to treat. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows for a higher biologically equivalent dose in an abbreviated course more convenient for patients and the integration of systemic therapy. We sought to investigate utilization trends and survival outcomes for patients treated with pancreatic SBRT versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). METHODS We engaged the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 1998-2012 and identified locally-advanced unresectable patients with histologically confirmed, non-metastatic, pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received radiotherapy. Patients who received CFRT (1.5-4.0 Gy per fraction to a dose of ≥45 Gy, n=11,879) were compared to those who received SBRT (6-15 Gy per fraction to a dose of ≥20 Gy, n=474). RESULTS Median follow-up was 11.0 months (18.4 months for survivors). SBRT utilization increased from 0.2% to 7.4% from 1998 to 2012 (P<0.05). On multivariable analysis, factors predictive for preferential utilization of SBRT over CFRT were later year of diagnosis, age ≥75 years, increased facility volume, and no chemotherapy in the initial treatment plan. Unadjusted median survival was 11.2 months for CFRT vs. 12.6 months for SBRT (P=0.002). Results were consistent in the propensity matched model. Variables predictive for improved survival on multivariable analysis were diagnosis after 2010, younger age, lower comorbidity score, tumor size <3 cm, nodal stage zero, and receipt of chemotherapy (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS SBRT utilization has increased significantly and is associated with a small absolute improvement in overall survival (OS) compared to CFRT. The decreased treatment time, without apparent compromise in survival, makes SBRT an attractive option for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer warranting further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Dohopolski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Scott M. Glaser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John A. Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review of Postoperative Morbidity, Mortality, and Complications. Am J Clin Oncol 2017; 39:302-13. [PMID: 26950464 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this review was to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) result in differential postoperative morbidity and mortality as compared with pancreatic tumor resection surgery alone. Using PRISMA guidelines and the PubMed search engine, we reviewed all prospective phase II trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CRT for pancreatic cancer that examined postoperative morbidities and mortalities. A total of 30 articles were identified, collated, and analyzed. Risks of postoperative complications vary based on trial. With surgery alone, the most common postoperative complications included delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (17% to 24%), pancreatic fistula (10% to 20%), anastomotic leaks (0% to 15%), postoperative bleeding (2% to 13%), and infections/sepsis (17% to 20%). With surgery alone, the mortality was <5%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed comparable fistula rates (3% to 4%), leaks (3% to 11%), infection (3% to 7%), with mortality 0% to 4% in all but 1 study. CRT for resectable/borderline resectable patients also showed comparable complication rates: DGE (6% to 15%), fistulas (2% to 3%), leaks (3% to 7%), bleeding/hemorrhage (2% to 13%), infections/sepsis (3% to 19%), with 9/13 studies showing a mortality of ≤4%. As compared with initially borderline/resectable tumors, CRT for initially unresectable tumors (despite less data) showed higher complication rates: DGE (13% to 33%), fistulas (3% to 25%), infections/sepsis (3% to 16%). However, the confounding factor of the potentially higher tumor burden as an associative agent remains. The only parameters slightly higher than historical surgery-only complication rates were leaks and bleeding/hemorrhage (13% to 20%). Mortality rates in these patients were consistently 0%, with 2 outliers. Hence, neoadjuvant chemotherapy/CRT is safe from a postoperative complication standpoint, without significant increases in complication rates compared with surgery alone. Resectable and borderline resectable patients have fewer complications as compared with unresectable patients, although data for the latter are lacking.
Collapse
|
17
|
The Role of Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer in the Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Settings. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2017; 26:431-453. [PMID: 28576181 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Although surgery remains the only curative treatment, chemotherapy and radiation therapy are frequently used. In the adjuvant setting, radiation is usually delivered with chemotherapy to eradicate residual microscopic or macroscopic disease in the resection bed. Neoadjuvant radiation therapy has become more frequently utilized. This article reviews the historical and modern literature regarding radiation therapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, focusing on the evolution of radiation therapy techniques and clinical trials in an attempt to identify patients best suited to receiving radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang M, Deng W, Cao X, Shi X, Zhao H, Duan Z, Lv B, Liu B. Concurrent apatinib and local radiation therapy for advanced gastric cancer: A case report and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e6241. [PMID: 28248891 PMCID: PMC5340464 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Apatinib is a novel anti-angiogenic agent targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, which is effective in patients with chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer. There are no reports of concurrent apatinib with local radiation therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSES:: we present the first published report of a 70-year-old male patient with advanced gastric cancer who received concurrent apatinib and local radiation therapy after failure of oxaliplatin and S-1 chemotherapy. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES The patient received concurrent apatinib and local radiation therapy and was followed up 7 months after therapy without disease progress, 14 months later indicated extensive metastasis and this patient died of pulmonary infection. LESSONS Elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer may benefit from concurrent apatinib with local radiation therapy when chemotherapy is not tolerated or successful. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes and toxicities associated with concurrent apatinib and radiation therapy in gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Weiye Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Xiaoci Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | | | - Huanfen Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zheping Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Bonan Lv
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery
| | - Bin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Groot VP, van Santvoort HC, Rombouts SJE, Hagendoorn J, Borel Rinkes IHM, van Vulpen M, Herman JM, Wolfgang CL, Besselink MG, Molenaar IQ. Systematic review on the treatment of isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after surgery; re-resection, chemoradiotherapy and SBRT. HPB (Oxford) 2017; 19:83-92. [PMID: 28065427 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of patients who have undergone a pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer develop disease recurrence within two years. In around 30% of these patients, isolated local recurrence (ILR) is found. The aim of this study was to systematically review treatment options for this subgroup of patients. METHODS A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Studies reporting on the treatment of ILR after initial curative-intent resection of primary pancreatic cancer were included. Primary endpoints were morbidity, mortality and survival after ILR treatment. RESULTS After screening 1152 studies, 18 studies reporting on 313 patients undergoing treatment for ILR were included. Treatment options for ILR included surgical re-resection (8 studies, 100 patients), chemoradiotherapy (7 studies, 153 patients) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) (4 studies, 60 patients). Morbidity and mortality were reported for re-resection (29% and 1%, respectively), chemoradiotherapy (54% and 0%) and SBRT (3% and 1%). Most patients had a prolonged disease-free interval before recurrence. Median survival after treatment of ILR of up to 32, 19 and 16 months was reported for re-resection, chemoradiotherapy and SBRT, respectively. CONCLUSION In selected patients, treatment of ILR following pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer seems safe, feasible and associated with relatively good survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Groot
- Dept. of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, The Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Dept. of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steffi J E Rombouts
- Dept. of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Dept. of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marco van Vulpen
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Marc G Besselink
- Dept. of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Dept. of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jamorabo DS, Lin SH, Jabbour SK. Successes and Failures of Combined Modalities in Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies: New Directions. Semin Radiat Oncol 2016; 26:307-19. [PMID: 27619252 PMCID: PMC10794083 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal malignancies generally have moderate to poor cure rates, even in the earliest stages, thereby implying that both local and systemic treatments have room for improvement. Therapeutic options are broadening, however, with the development of new immunotherapies and targeted agents, which can have synergistic effects with radiotherapy. Here we discuss the current state of combined modality therapy for upper gastrointestinal malignancies, specifically recent successes and setbacks in trials of radiation therapy with targeted therapies, vaccines, immunotherapies, and chemotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Jamorabo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nayır E, Ermis E. Chemoradiation of pancreatic carcinoma. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jons.2016.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
22
|
Safety assessment of molecular targeted therapies in association with radiotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs 2016; 27:427-32. [DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
23
|
Rakhra S, Strauss JB, Robertson J, McGinn CJ, Kim T, Huang J, Blake A, Helenowski I, Hayes JP, Mulcahy M, Small W. Hypofractionated Conformal Radiotherapy with Concurrent Full-Dose Gemcitabine Versus Standard Fractionation Radiotherapy with Concurrent Fluorouracil for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: a Multi-Institution Experience. J Gastrointest Cancer 2016; 47:196-201. [PMID: 27112332 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9821-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The purpose of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes and toxicity profile of hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent full-dose gemcitabine versus standard fractionation RT with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of unresectable non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with unresectable non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated at three institutions were included. All patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) consisting of either hypofractionated RT to the gross disease concurrent with a full-dose gemcitabine-based regimen versus standard fractionation RT to the tumor and elective nodes concurrent with 5-FU. End points included rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). RESULTS From January 1999 to December 2009, 170 patients were identified (118 RT/gemcitabine, 52 RT/5-FU). There were no differences in demographic or clinical factors. Acute GI toxicities (grades <3 versus ≥3) were 82.2 and 17.8 %, respectively, for patients treated with RT/gemcitabine and 78.9 and 21.2 % for those treated with RT/5-FU (p = 0.67). Late GI toxicities (grades <3 versus ≥3) were 88.1 and 11.9 %, respectively, for RT/gemcitabine and 80.8 and 19.2 % for RT/5-FU (p = 0.23). OS for RT/gemcitabine and RT/5-FU were 52 versus 36 % at 1 year and 14 versus 6 % at 2 years favoring the RT/gemcitabine group (p = 0.02). DMFS at 1 and 2 years for RT/gemcitabine were 41 and 11 % versus 24 and 4 % for RT/5-FU (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS RT/gemcitabine was equivalent in toxicity to RT/5-FU but was associated with superior OS and DMFS. When RT is used in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer, hypofractionated conformal RT with concurrent full-dose gemcitabine may be the preferred approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunpreet Rakhra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jonathan B Strauss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John Robertson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Cornelius J McGinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Thomas Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jiayi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrew Blake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Irene Helenowski
- Northwestern University Cancer Biostatistics Core, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John P Hayes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mary Mulcahy
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S 1st Ave Maguire Center, Rm 2932, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The outcomes for treatment of pancreatic cancer have not improved dramatically in many decades. However, the recent promising results with combination chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease increase optimism for future treatments. With greater control of overt or occult metastatic disease, there will likely be an expanding role for local treatment modalities, especially given that nearly a third of pancreatic cancer patients have locally destructive disease without distant metastatic disease at the time of death. Technical advances have allowed for the safe delivery of dose-escalated radiation therapy, which can then be combined with chemotherapy, targeted agents, immunotherapy, and nanoparticulate drug delivery techniques to produce novel and improved synergistic effects. Here we discuss recent advances and future directions for multimodality therapy in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
25
|
Versteijne E, van Eijck CHJ, Punt CJA, Suker M, Zwinderman AH, Dohmen MAC, Groothuis KBC, Busch ORC, Besselink MGH, de Hingh IHJT, Ten Tije AJ, Patijn GA, Bonsing BA, de Vos-Geelen J, Klaase JM, Festen S, Boerma D, Erdmann JI, Molenaar IQ, van der Harst E, van der Kolk MB, Rasch CRN, van Tienhoven G. Preoperative radiochemotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:127. [PMID: 26955809 PMCID: PMC4784417 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1262-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer is the fourth largest cause of cancer death in the United States and Europe with over 100,000 deaths per year in Europe alone. The overall 5-year survival ranges from 2–7 % and has hardly improved over the last two decades. Approximately 15 % of all patients have resectable disease at diagnosis, and of those, only a subgroup has a resectable tumour at surgical exploration. Data from cohort studies have suggested that outcome can be improved by preoperative radiochemotherapy, but data from well-designed randomized studies are lacking. Our PREOPANC phase III trial aims to test the hypothesis that median overall survival of patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer can be improved with preoperative radiochemotherapy. Methods/design The PREOPANC trial is a randomized, controlled, multicentric superiority trial, initiated by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer are randomized to A: direct explorative laparotomy or B: after negative diagnostic laparoscopy, preoperative radiochemotherapy, followed by explorative laparotomy. A hypofractionated radiation scheme of 15 fractions of 2.4 gray (Gy) is combined with a course of gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m2/dose on days 1, 8 and 15, preceded and followed by a modified course of gemcitabine. The target volumes of radiation are delineated on a 4D CT scan, where at least 95 % of the prescribed dose of 36 Gy in 15 fractions should cover 98 % of the planning target volume. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy is administered in both treatment arms after resection (six cycles in arm A and four in arm B). In total, 244 patients will be randomized in 17 hospitals in the Netherlands. The primary endpoint is overall survival by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints are (R0) resection rate, disease-free survival, time to locoregional recurrence or distant metastases and perioperative complications. Secondary endpoints for the experimental arm are toxicity and radiologic and pathologic response. Discussion The PREOPANC trial is designed to investigate whether preoperative radiochemotherapy improves overall survival by means of increased (R0) resection rates in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Trial registration Trial open for accrual: 3 April 2013 The Netherlands National Trial Register – NTR3709 (8 November 2012) EU Clinical Trials Register – 2012-003181-40 (11 December 2012)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Versteijne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mustafa Suker
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Aeilko H Zwinderman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiologic Biostatics, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Miriam A C Dohmen
- Clinical Research Department, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands (IKNL), Postbus 1281, 6501 BG, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Karin B C Groothuis
- Clinical Research Department, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands (IKNL), Postbus 1281, 6501 BG, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Oliver R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc G H Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Albert J Ten Tije
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Postbus 90158, 4800 RK, Breda, The Netherlands.
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Postbus 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbus 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Postbus 50 000, 7500 KA, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Sebastiaan Festen
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Postbus 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Postbus 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Postbus 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Erwin van der Harst
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marion B van der Kolk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Coen R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Combination of carbon ion beam and gemcitabine causes irreparable DNA damage and death of radioresistant pancreatic cancer stem-like cells in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget 2016; 6:5517-35. [PMID: 25849939 PMCID: PMC4467384 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
We try to elucidate whether a carbon ion beam alone or in combination with gemcitabine has advantages over X-ray in targeting putative pancreatic cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Colony, spheroid formation and tumorigenicity assays confirmed that CD44+/ESA+ cells sorted from PANC1 and PK45 cells have more CSC properties than CD44−/ESA− cells. The number of colonies and spheroids formed from CSCs after carbon ion beam irradiation was significantly reduced compared to after X-ray irradiation, and they were extremely highly suppressed when carbon ion beam combined with gemcitabine. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for the carbon ion beam relative to X-ray at the D10 levels for CSCs were 2.23-2.66. Expressions of multiple cell death-related genes were remarkably highly induced, and large numbers of γH2AX foci in CSCs were formed after carbon ion beam combined with gemcitabine. The highly expressed CSC markers were significantly inhibited after 30 Gy of carbon ion beam and almost lost after 25 Gy carbon ion beam combined with 50 mg/kg gemcitabine. In conclusion, a carbon ion beam combined with gemcitabine has superior potential to kill pancreatic CSCs via irreparable clustered DSB compared to a carbon ion alone or X-rays combined with gemcitabine.
Collapse
|
27
|
Overview of pre-clinical and clinical studies targeting angiogenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Lett 2015; 381:201-10. [PMID: 26723874 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.11.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The importance of angiogenesis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its therapeutic potential have been explored in both pre-clinical and clinical studies. Human PDACs overexpress a number of angiogenic factors and their cognate high-affinity receptors, and anti-angiogenic agents reduce tumor volume, metastasis, and microvessel density (MVD), and improve survival in subcutaneous and orthotopic pre-clinical models. Nonetheless, clinical trials using anti-angiogenic therapy have been overwhelmingly unsuccessful. This review will focus on these pre-clinical and clinical studies, the potential reasons for failure in the clinical setting, and ways these shortcomings could be addressed in future investigations of angiogenic mechanisms in PDAC.
Collapse
|
28
|
Pollom EL, Deng L, Pai RK, Brown JM, Giaccia A, Loo BW, Shultz DB, Le QT, Koong AC, Chang DT. Gastrointestinal Toxicities With Combined Antiangiogenic and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:568-76. [PMID: 26068491 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2014] [Revised: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Combining the latest targeted biologic agents with the most advanced radiation technologies has been an exciting development in the treatment of cancer patients. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an ablative radiation approach that has become established for the treatment of a variety of malignancies, and it has been increasingly used in combination with biologic agents, including those targeting angiogenesis-specific pathways. Multiple reports have emerged describing unanticipated toxicities arising from the combination of SBRT and angiogenesis-targeting agents, particularly of late luminal gastrointestinal toxicities. In this review, we summarize the literature describing these toxicities, explore the biological mechanism of action of toxicity with the combined use of antiangiogenic therapies, and discuss areas of future research, so that this combination of treatment modalities can continue to be used in broader clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Reetesh K Pai
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - J Martin Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Amato Giaccia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - David B Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Zweeden AA, van der Vliet HJ, Wilmink JW, Meijerink MR, Meijer OWM, Bruynzeel AME, van Tienhoven G, Giovannetti E, Kazemier G, Jacobs MAJM, Verheul HMW. Phase I Clinical Trial to Determine the Feasibility and Maximum Tolerated Dose of Panitumumab to Standard Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21:4569-75. [PMID: 26056353 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2014] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors may improve both the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy and the radiosensitizing activity of gemcitabine. Based on this rationale and the nonoverlapping toxicity profiles of gemcitabine and the monoclonal EGFR antibody panitumumab, we designed a phase I trial to investigate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and activity of panitumumab added to gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with LAPC and WHO performance status 0 to 1 were treated with weekly panitumumab at four dose levels (1-2.5 mg/kg), combined with weekly gemcitabine 300 mg/m(2) and radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) for 6 weeks, followed by gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Each cohort was monitored during the combination therapy to establish dose limiting toxicity. Tumor evaluation was performed after CRT and during gemcitabine monotherapy. RESULTS Fourteen patients were enrolled; 14 were evaluable for toxicity and 13 for response. The MTD for panitumumab was 1.5 mg/kg. Three of the 6 patients, treated at MTD, experienced grade 3 adverse events during the combination therapy; neutropenia (n = 2; 33%), fatigue (n = 1; 17%), nausea (n = 1; 17%), and vomiting (n = 1; 17%). Partial response was achieved by 3 patients (23%), 1 in each dose cohort. Median progression free survival of the three cohorts together was 8.9 months. CONCLUSIONS The addition of panitumumab to gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in LAPC has manageable toxicity and potential clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette A van Zweeden
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans J van der Vliet
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Otto W M Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Elisa Giovannetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten A J M Jacobs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
This article focuses on the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer, which should be treated as a distinct entity separate from metastatic disease and borderline resectable disease. Although the role, timing, and sequencing of radiation relative to systemic therapy in this disease are controversial, an emerging treatment paradigm involves induction chemotherapy, followed by consolidative chemoradiation in patients who do not progress. In addition, new chemotherapy regimens as well as novel radiosensitizers have shown promise and need to be tested further in the locally advanced setting. Advances in radiotherapy have enabled stereotactic body radiotherapy and should continue to be prospectively evaluated.
Collapse
|
31
|
CA 19-9 Nonproduction Is Associated With Poor Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2014; 37:550-4. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e318280d5f0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
32
|
Abstract
The development of molecular targeted therapeutics in oncology builds on many years of scientific investigation into the cellular mechanics of malignant transformation and progression. The past two decades have brought an accelerating pace to the clinical investigation of new molecular targeted agents, particularly in the setting of metastatic disease. The integration of molecular targeted agents into phase III clinical trial design has lagged in the curative treatment setting, particularly in combination with established therapeutic modalities such as radiation. In this review, we discuss the interaction of radiation and molecular targeted therapeutics. The dynamics of cellular and tumor response to radiation offer unique opportunities for beneficial interplay with molecular targeted agents that may go unrecognized with conventional screening and monotherapy clinical testing of novel agents. By using epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a primary example, we discuss recent clinical studies that illustrate the potential synergy of molecular targeted agents with radiation and highlight the clinical value of such interactions. For various molecular targeted agents, their greatest clinical impact may rest in combination with radiation, and efforts to facilitate systematic investigation of this approach appear highly warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Morris
- All authors: University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Paul M Harari
- All authors: University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the Western world. Owing to a lack of specific symptoms and no accessible precursor lesions, primary diagnosis is commonly delayed, resulting in only 15%-20% of patients with potentially curable disease. The standard of care in advanced pancreatic cancer has improved. Apart from gemcitabine (plus erlotinib), FOLFIRINOX and the combination of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel are novel and promising therapeutic options for patients with metastatic PDAC. A better molecular understanding of pancreatic cancer has led to the identification of a variety of potential molecular therapeutic targets. Many targeted therapies are currently under clinical evaluation in combination with standard therapies for PDAC. This review highlights the current status of targeted therapies and their potential benefit for the treatment of advanced PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kleger
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - L Perkhofer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - T Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. Due to lack of specific symptoms and no accessible precursor lesions, primary diagnosis is commonly delayed, resulting in the identification of only 15-20% of patients with potentially curable disease. The major limiting factor is an already locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Consequently, systemic therapy forms the backbone of treatment strategy for the majority of patients. SUMMARY A deeper understanding of the molecular characteristics of pancreatic cancer has led to the identification of several potential therapeutic targets. A variety of targeted therapies are currently under clinical evaluation as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy for PDAC. This review highlights the current state of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer and provides an outlook on its future perspectives. KEY MESSAGE This review focuses on the current chemotherapy regimens for the systemic treatment of PDAC. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Various neoadjuvant approaches have been explored, including chemoradiation, chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or intensified chemotherapy without defining a standard of care so far. The standard of care is gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil. The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 may be a promising new agent in this setting. For first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer, no targeted therapy has yet demonstrated clinical benefit apart from the combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib plus gemcitabine. Recently, novel chemotherapeutic regimens such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel have been introduced. Both combinations have proved to be superior to the standard gemcitabine regimen. For second-line treatment the combination of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin yields improved results compared to best supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
A phase I, dose-finding study of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and radiation therapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a Grupo Español Multidisciplinario en Cáncer Digestivo (GEMCAD) study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e82209. [PMID: 24416138 PMCID: PMC3886976 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2013] [Accepted: 10/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Sorafenib, an oral inhibitor of B-raf, VEGFR2, and PDGFR2-beta, acts against pancreatic cancer in preclinical models. Due to the radio-sensitization activity of both sorafenib and gemcitabine, we designed a multicenter, phase I trial to evaluate the safety profile and the recommended dose of this combination used with concomitant radiation therapy. METHODS Patients with biopsy-proven, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (based on vascular invasion detected by computed tomography) were treated with gemcitabine (300 mg/m2 i.v. weekly ×5 weeks) concurrently with radiation therapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) and sorafenib (escalated doses in a 3+3 design, from 200 to 800 mg/day). Radiation portals included the primary tumor but not the regional lymph nodes. Patients with planning target volumes (PTV) over 500 cc were excluded. Cases not progressing during chemoradiation were allowed to continue with sorafenib until disease progression. RESULTS Twelve patients were included. Three patients received 200 mg/day, 6 received 400 mg/day, and 3 received 800 mg/day; PTVs ranged from 105 to 500 cc. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The most common grade 2 toxicities were fatigue, neutropenia, nausea, and raised serum transaminases. Treatment was discontinued in one patient because of a reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION The addition of sorafenib to concurrent gemcitabine and radiation therapy showed a favorable safety profile in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A dose of 800 mg/day is recommended for phase II evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT 2007-003211-31 ClinicalTrials.gov 00789763.
Collapse
|
36
|
Barney BM, Markovic SN, Laack NN, Miller RC, Sarkaria JN, Macdonald OK, Bauer HJ, Olivier KR. Increased Bowel Toxicity in Patients Treated With a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor (VEGFI) After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 87:73-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2013] [Revised: 05/03/2013] [Accepted: 05/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
37
|
Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, Laheru DA, Klein AP, Erdek MA, Fishman EK, Hruban RH. Recent progress in pancreatic cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63:318-48. [PMID: 23856911 PMCID: PMC3769458 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 644] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2013] [Revised: 03/22/2013] [Accepted: 03/22/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is currently one of the deadliest of the solid malignancies. However, surgery to resect neoplasms of the pancreas is safer and less invasive than ever, novel drug combinations have been shown to improve survival, advances in radiation therapy have resulted in less toxicity, and enormous strides have been made in the understanding of the fundamental genetics of pancreatic cancer. These advances provide hope but they also increase the complexity of caring for patients. It is clear that multidisciplinary care that provides comprehensive and coordinated evaluation and treatment is the most effective way to manage patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L. Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Joseph M. Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Daniel A. Laheru
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Alison P. Klein
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
- Department of Epidemiology, the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael A. Erdek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Van Buren G, Ramanathan RK, Krasinskas AM, Smith RP, Abood GJ, Bahary N, Lembersky BC, Shuai Y, Potter DM, Bartlett DL, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Moser AJ. Phase II study of induction fixed-dose rate gemcitabine and bevacizumab followed by 30 Gy radiotherapy as preoperative treatment for potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20:3787-93. [PMID: 23904005 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3161-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2012] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eighty percent of patients with resected pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDC) experience treatment failure within 2 years. We hypothesized that preoperative fixed-dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine (GEM) combined with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab (BEV) and accelerated 30 Gy radiotherapy (RT) would improve outcomes among patients with potentially resectable PDC. METHODS This phase II trial tested induction FDR GEM (1,500 mg/m(2)) plus BEV (10 mg/kg IV) every 2 weeks for three cycles followed by accelerated RT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) plus BEV directed at gross tumor volume plus a 1-2 cm vascular margin. Subjects underwent laparoscopy and resection after day 85. Therapy was considered effective if the complete pathologic response rate exceeded 10 % and the margin-negative resection rate exceeded 80%. RESULTS Fifty-nine subjects were enrolled; 29 had potential portal vein involvement. Two grade 4 (3.4%) and 19 grade 3 toxicities (32.8%) occurred. Four subjects manifested radiographic progression, and 10 had undetected carcinomatosis. Forty-three pancreatic resections (73%) were performed, including 19 portal vein resections (44%). Margin-negative outcomes were observed in 38 (88%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 75-96), with one complete pathologic response (2.3%; 95% CI 0.1-12). There were seven (6 grade 3; 1 grade 4) wound complications (13%). Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 16.8 months (95% CI 14.9-21.3) and 19.7 months (95% CI 16.5-28.2) after resection. CONCLUSIONS Induction therapy with FDR GEM and BEV, followed by accelerated BEV/RT to 30 Gy, was well tolerated. Although both effectiveness criteria were achieved, survival outcomes were equivalent to published regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Van Buren
- Division of Surgical Oncology, UPMC Pancreatic Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, Laheru DA, Klein AP, Erdek MA, Fishman EK, Hruban RH. Recent progress in pancreatic cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2013. [PMID: 23856911 DOI: 10.1002/caac.21190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is currently one of the deadliest of the solid malignancies. However, surgery to resect neoplasms of the pancreas is safer and less invasive than ever, novel drug combinations have been shown to improve survival, advances in radiation therapy have resulted in less toxicity, and enormous strides have been made in the understanding of the fundamental genetics of pancreatic cancer. These advances provide hope but they also increase the complexity of caring for patients. It is clear that multidisciplinary care that provides comprehensive and coordinated evaluation and treatment is the most effective way to manage patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L Wolfgang
- Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schmidt B, Lee HJ, Ryeom S, Yoon SS. Combining Bevacizumab with Radiation or Chemoradiation for Solid Tumors: A Review of the Scientific Rationale, and Clinical Trials. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 1:169-179. [PMID: 24977113 DOI: 10.2174/2211552811201030169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy or the combination of radiation and chemotherapy is an important component in the local control of many tumor types including glioblastoma, rectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer. The addition of anti-angiogenic agents to chemotherapy is now standard treatment for a variety of metastatic cancers including colorectal cancer and non-squamous cell lung cancer. Anti-angiogenic agents can increase the efficacy of radiation or chemoradiation for primary tumors through mechanisms such as vascular normalization and augmentation of endothelial cell injury. The most commonly used anti-angiogenic drug, bevacizumab, is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). Dozens of preclinical studies nearly uniformly demonstrate that inhibition of VEGF-A or its receptors potentiates the effects of radiation therapy against solid tumors, and this potentiation is generally independent of the type or schedule of radiation and timing of VEGF-A inhibitor delivery. There are now several clinical trials combining bevacizumab with radiation or chemoradiation for the local control of various primary, recurrent, and metastatic tumors, and many of these early trials show encouraging results. Some added toxicities occur with the delivery of bevacizumab but common toxicities such as hypertension and proteinuria are generally easily managed while severe toxicities are rare. In the future, bevacizumab and other anti-angiogenic agents may become common additions to radiation and chemoradiation regimens for tumors that are difficult to locally control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hae-June Lee
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sandra Ryeom
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sam S Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA ; Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Niyazi M, Maihoefer C, Krause M, Rödel C, Budach W, Belka C. Radiotherapy and "new" drugs-new side effects? Radiat Oncol 2011; 6:177. [PMID: 22188921 PMCID: PMC3266653 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-6-177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2011] [Accepted: 12/21/2011] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Targeted drugs have augmented the cancer treatment armamentarium. Based on the molecular specificity, it was initially believed that these drugs had significantly less side effects. However, currently it is accepted that all of these agents have their specific side effects. Based on the given multimodal approach, special emphasis has to be placed on putative interactions of conventional cytostatic drugs, targeted agents and other modalities. The interaction of targeted drugs with radiation harbours special risks, since the awareness for interactions and even synergistic toxicities is lacking. At present, only limited is data available regarding combinations of targeted drugs and radiotherapy. This review gives an overview on the current knowledge on such combined treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the following MESH headings and combinations of these terms pubmed database was searched: Radiotherapy AND cetuximab/trastuzumab/panitumumab/nimotuzumab, bevacizumab, sunitinib/sorafenib/lapatinib/gefitinib/erlotinib/sirolimus, thalidomide/lenalidomide as well as erythropoietin. For citation crosscheck the ISI web of science database was used employing the same search terms. RESULTS Several classes of targeted substances may be distinguished: Small molecules including kinase inhibitors and specific inhibitors, antibodies, and anti-angiogenic agents. Combination of these agents with radiotherapy may lead to specific toxicities or negatively influence the efficacy of RT. Though there is only little information on the interaction of molecular targeted radiation and radiotherapy in clinical settings, several critical incidents are reported. CONCLUSIONS The addition of molecular targeted drugs to conventional radiotherapy outside of approved regimens or clinical trials warrants a careful consideration especially when used in conjunction in hypo-fractionated regimens. Clinical trials are urgently needed in order to address the open question in regard to efficacy, early and late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Cornelius Maihoefer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Johung K, Saif MW, Chang BW. Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the role of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 82:508-18. [PMID: 22075449 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2011] [Revised: 06/24/2011] [Accepted: 08/02/2011] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Surgical resection can be curative, but the majority of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Treatment for patients with locally advanced disease is controversial. Therapeutic options include systemic therapy alone, concurrent chemoradiation, or induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation. We review the evidence to date regarding the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), as well as evolving strategies including the emerging role of targeted therapies. We propose that if radiation is used for patients with LAPC, it should be delivered with concurrent chemotherapy and following a period of induction chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Johung
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8040, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Andriulli A, Festa V, Botteri E, Valvano MR, Koch M, Bassi C, Maisonneuve P, Sebastiano PD. Neoadjuvant/preoperative gemcitabine for patients with localized pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 19:1644-62. [PMID: 22012027 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2110-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term prognosis for localized pancreatic cancer remains poor. We sought to assess the benefit of neoadjuvant/preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. METHODS Prospective studies where gemcitabine with or without radiotherapy was provided before surgery in patients with initially resectable or unresectable disease were reviewed by meta-analysis. Primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes were tumor response after therapy, toxicity, surgical exploration, and resection rates. RESULTS Twenty independent studies with 707 participants were included, 366 with resectable lesions and 341 with unresectable lesions. Seven studies were phase I/II trials, 10 phase II, and 3 prospective cohort studies. Estimated 1- and 2-year survival probabilities after resection were 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75-100) and 67.2% (95% CI 38-87) for initially resectable patients, and 86.3% (95% CI 78-100) and 54.2% (95% CI 25-100) for initially unresectable patients. The complete/partial response rate was 12% (95% CI 4-23) and 27% (95% CI 18-38) in resectable and unresectable lesions, respectively. The rate of treatment-related grade 3-4 toxicity was 31% (95% CI 21-42). Of resectable patients evaluable after restaging, 91% (95% CI 83-97) underwent surgery, and 82% (95% CI 65-95) of explored patients underwent resection. R0 resections amounted to 89% (95% CI 83-94). Of unresectable patients evaluable after restaging, 39% (95% CI 28-50) underwent surgery, and 68% (95% CI 53-82) of explored patients were resected, with 60% (95% CI 50-71) R0 resections. CONCLUSIONS Current analysis provides marginal support to the assumed benefits of neoadjuvant therapies for patients with resectable cancer, and indicates a potential advantage only for a minority of those with unresectable lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Andriulli
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Hospital, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Huguet F, Fernet M, Monnier L, Touboul E, Favaudon V. [New perspectives for radiosensitization in pancreatic carcinoma: a review of mechanisms involved in pancreatic tumorigenesis]. Cancer Radiother 2011; 15:365-75. [PMID: 21664851 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2011.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2011] [Revised: 03/30/2011] [Accepted: 04/06/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic carcinoma is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The 5-year overall survival is less than 5 %. This very poor prognosis can be explained both by late diagnosis and by treatment resistance, including resistance to radiation therapy. A better understanding of the pancreatic tumorigenesis and knowledge of the most frequent mutations in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (KRAS, p16, TP53, Smad4) open new perspectives for the development of more effective treatments. This review presents the major genetic and molecular alterations in pancreatic cancer that could be targeted to improve radiosensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|