1
|
Dabic-Stankovic K, Rajkovic K, Stankovic J, Marosevic G, Kolarevic G, Pavicar B. High-dose-rate Brachytherapy Monotherapy in Patients With Localised Prostate Cancer: Dose Modelling and Optimisation Using Computer Algorithms. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:378-389. [PMID: 38584072 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is an effective therapy modality for patients with localized prostate carcinoma. The objectives of the study were to optimise the therapy regime variables using two models: response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN). MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-one studies with 5651 patients were included (2078 patients presented as low-risk, 3077 patients with intermediate-risk, and 496 patients with high-risk). A comparison of these therapy schedules was carried out using an effective biologically effective dose (BEDef) that was calculated assuming the number of treatment days and dose (D) per day. The modelling and optimization of therapy parameters (BEDef and risk level) in order to obtain the maximum biochemical free survival (BFS) were carried out by the RSM and ANN models. RESULTS An optimal treatment schedule (BFS = 97%) for patients presented with low-risk biochemical recurrence would be D = 26 Gy applied in one application, 2 fractions at least 6 h apart, within an overall treatment time of 1 day (BEDef = 251 Gy) by the RSM and ANN model. For patients presented with intermediate- or high-risk an optimal treatment regime (BFS = 94% and 90%, respectively) would be D = 38 Gy applied in one application, 4 fractions at least 6 h apart, with an overall treatment time of 2 days (BEDef = 279 Gy) by the RSM and ANN models. CONCLUSIONS The RSM and ANN models determine almost the same optimal values for the set of predicted therapy parameters that make a feasible selection of an optimal treatment regime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Dabic-Stankovic
- IMC Affidea, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - K Rajkovic
- Academy of Applied Preschool Teaching and Health Studies, Krusevac, Serbia; Bijeljina University, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
| | - J Stankovic
- Bijeljina University, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Academy for Applied Studies Belgrade, The College of Health Sciences, Zemun, Serbia.
| | - G Marosevic
- IMC Affidea, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - G Kolarevic
- IMC Affidea, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - B Pavicar
- IMC Affidea, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen ZJ, Li XA, Brenner DJ, Hellebust TP, Hoskin P, Joiner MC, Kirisits C, Nath R, Rivard MJ, Thomadsen BR, Zaider M. AAPM Task Group Report 267: A joint AAPM GEC-ESTRO report on biophysical models and tools for the planning and evaluation of brachytherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:3850-3923. [PMID: 38721942 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Brachytherapy utilizes a multitude of radioactive sources and treatment techniques that often exhibit widely different spatial and temporal dose delivery patterns. Biophysical models, capable of modeling the key interacting effects of dose delivery patterns with the underlying cellular processes of the irradiated tissues, can be a potentially useful tool for elucidating the radiobiological effects of complex brachytherapy dose delivery patterns and for comparing their relative clinical effectiveness. While the biophysical models have been used largely in research settings by experts, it has also been used increasingly by clinical medical physicists over the last two decades. A good understanding of the potentials and limitations of the biophysical models and their intended use is critically important in the widespread use of these models. To facilitate meaningful and consistent use of biophysical models in brachytherapy, Task Group 267 (TG-267) was formed jointly with the American Association of Physics in Medicine (AAPM) and The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) to review the existing biophysical models, model parameters, and their use in selected brachytherapy modalities and to develop practice guidelines for clinical medical physicists regarding the selection, use, and interpretation of biophysical models. The report provides an overview of the clinical background and the rationale for the development of biophysical models in radiation oncology and, particularly, in brachytherapy; a summary of the results of literature review of the existing biophysical models that have been used in brachytherapy; a focused discussion of the applications of relevant biophysical models for five selected brachytherapy modalities; and the task group recommendations on the use, reporting, and implementation of biophysical models for brachytherapy treatment planning and evaluation. The report concludes with discussions on the challenges and opportunities in using biophysical models for brachytherapy and with an outlook for future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Jay Chen
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - David J Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Taran P Hellebust
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Center, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael C Joiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ravinder Nath
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Bruce R Thomadsen
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Marco Zaider
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang L, Ding Y, Bruno TL, Stafford RJ, Lin E, Bathala TK, Sanders JW, Ning MS, Ma J, Klopp AH, Venkatesan A, Wang J, Martirosyan KS, Frank SJ. A Novel Positive-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Line Marker for High-Dose-Rate (HDR) MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1922. [PMID: 38792000 PMCID: PMC11119838 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can facilitate accurate organ delineation and optimal dose distributions in high-dose-rate (HDR) MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS). Its use for this purpose has been limited by the lack of positive-contrast MRI markers that can clearly delineate the lumen of the HDR applicator and precisely show the path of the HDR source on T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. We investigated a novel MRI positive-contrast HDR brachytherapy or interventional radiotherapy line marker, C4:S, consisting of C4 (visible on T1-weighted images) complexed with saline. Longitudinal relaxation time (T1) and transverse relaxation time (T2) for C4:S were measured on a 1.5 T MRI scanner. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) tubing filled with C4:S as an HDR brachytherapy line marker was tested for visibility on T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences in a tissue-equivalent female ultrasound training pelvis phantom. Relaxivity measurements indicated that C4:S solution had good T1-weighted contrast (relative to oil [fat] signal intensity) and good T2-weighted contrast (relative to water signal intensity) at both room temperature (relaxivity ratio > 1; r2/r1 = 1.43) and body temperature (relaxivity ratio > 1; r2/r1 = 1.38). These measurements were verified by the positive visualization of the C4:S (C4/saline 50:50) HDPE tube HDR brachytherapy line marker on both T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. Orientation did not affect the relaxivity of the C4:S contrast solution. C4:S encapsulated in HDPE tubing can be visualized as a positive line marker on both T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. MRI-guided HDR planning may be possible with these novel line markers for HDR MARS for several types of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Wang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.W.); (E.L.)
| | - Yao Ding
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.D.); (J.W.)
| | - Teresa L. Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (T.L.B.); (M.S.N.); (A.H.K.)
| | - R. Jason Stafford
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.J.S.); (J.M.)
| | - Eric Lin
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.W.); (E.L.)
| | - Tharakeswara K. Bathala
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (T.K.B.); (A.V.)
| | | | - Matthew S. Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (T.L.B.); (M.S.N.); (A.H.K.)
| | - Jingfei Ma
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.J.S.); (J.M.)
| | - Ann H. Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (T.L.B.); (M.S.N.); (A.H.K.)
| | - Aradhana Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (T.K.B.); (A.V.)
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.D.); (J.W.)
| | - Karen S. Martirosyan
- Department of Physics, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX 78500, USA;
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (T.L.B.); (M.S.N.); (A.H.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gesztesi L, Kocsis ZS, Jorgo K, Fröhlich G, Polgár C, Ágoston P. Alterations of Sexual and Erectile Functions after Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer Based on Patient-Reported Questionnaires. Prostate Cancer 2024; 2024:5729185. [PMID: 38312318 PMCID: PMC10834089 DOI: 10.1155/2024/5729185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the side effects of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRBT), with a particular focus on the effects on sexual functions and sexual well-being (PROMOBRA study, NCT02258087). Localized low-risk and low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with mono LDR (N = 123, 145 Gy dose) or mono HDR brachytherapy (N = 117, 19/21 Gy). Prior to the treatment and during follow-up (at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment, and then annually after two years), patients completed patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) questionnaires EORTC QLQ-PR-25, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and IIEF-5 (SHIM). We compared the patients in different group breakdowns (HDR vs. LDR, hormone naïve and hormone-receiving HDR vs. LDR, hormone naïve and hormone-receiving patients in general, and 19 Gy HDR vs. 21 Gy HDR). In the hormone-naive LDR group, erectile function, orgasm function, sexual desire, satisfaction with intercourse, and overall satisfaction functions significantly decreased compared to baseline throughout the whole follow-up period. However, there were significant decreases in function at a maximum of three time points after HDR therapy without hormone therapy. In hormone-receiving patients, the orgasm function was significantly better in the HDR group at multiple time points compared to the baseline, and sexual desire improved at four time points. According to our results, both LDRBT and HDRBT can be safely administered to patients with localized prostate cancer. In hormone-naive patients, the HDR group showed only recovering decreases in sexual functions, while the LDR group showed a lasting decline in multiple areas. Thus, HDR appears to be more advantageous to hormone-naive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- László Gesztesi
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsa S. Kocsis
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Department of Radiobiology and Diagnostic Onco-Cytogenetics and National Tumorbiology Laboratory, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Kliton Jorgo
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
- Semmelweis University, Department of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Georgina Fröhlich
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgár
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
- Semmelweis University, Department of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Ágoston
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
- Semmelweis University, Department of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ong WL, Evans M, Papa N, Williams S, Millar J. Population-based patient-reported quality of life outcomes following low-dose-rate versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:789-795. [PMID: 37828817 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate patient reported quality of life outcomes (QoL) following low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy for prostate cancer at a population-based setting. METHODS The study comprised men with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry Victoria (PCOR-Vic), who were treated with LDR-BT or HDR-BT monotherapy between 2015 and 2020 and completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire 12-month post-treatment. Men who had ADT were excluded (n = 12). Differences in substantial symptoms (i.e. 'moderate' or 'big' problem on a 5-point Likert scale) between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms were evaluated using Pearson's chi-squared test. Multivariable linear regressions were used to estimate differences in EPIC-26 urinary, bowel and sexual functional domain scores between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms. RESULTS Overall, 198 men were included in this study, of which 167 (84%) had LDR-BT and 31 (16%) had HDR-BT. 9 (4.6%), 10 (5.1%) and 56 (28%) reported substantial symptoms for overall urinary, bowel and sexual function at 12-month post-treatment, with no significant difference between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms. The adjusted mean differences in urinary incontinence, urinary obstructive, bowel and sexual function domain scores between LDR-BT and HDT-BT were: -3.53 (-8.21 to 1.14), -1.27 (-6.88 to 4.35), -0.01 (-5.63 to 5.63) and -8.68 (-21.44 to 4.07) respectively - these were not statistically significant and did not meet the minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSION This is the first Australian population-based study comparing QoL in men who had LDR-BT and HDR-BT, with no statistically or clinically significant differences in QoL observed at 12-month post-treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Evans
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Papa
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fuller DB, Crabtree T, Kane BL, Medbery CA, Pfeffer R, Gray JR, Peddada A, Royce TJ, Chen RC. High Dose “HDR-Like” Prostate SBRT: PSA 10-Year Results From a Mature, Multi-Institutional Clinical Trial. Front Oncol 2022; 12:935310. [PMID: 35965547 PMCID: PMC9373838 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.935310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s) Although ample intermediate-term prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) outcomes have been reported, 10-year results remain relatively sparse. Materials/Methods Eighteen institutions enrolled 259 low- and intermediate-risk patients. Median follow-up is 5.5 years, with 66 patients followed ≥ 10 years. This SBRT regimen specifically emulated an existing HDR brachytherapy dose schedule and isodose morphology, prescribed to 38 Gy/4 fractions, delivered daily by robotic SBRT, mandating > 150% dose escalation in the peripheral zone. Androgen deprivation therapy was not allowed, and a hydrogel spacer was not available at that time. Results Median pre-SBRT PSA 5.12 ng/mL decreased to 0.1 ng/mL by 3.5 years, with further decrease to a nadir of < 0.1 ng/mL by 7 years, maintained through 10 years. Ten-year freedom from biochemical recurrence measured 100% for low-risk, 84.3% for favorable intermediate risk (FIR), and 68.4% for unfavorable intermediate (UIR) cases. Multivariable analysis revealed that the UIR group bifurcated into two distinct prognostic subgroups. Those so classified by having Gleason score 4 + 3 and/or clinical stage T2 (versus T1b/T1c) had a significantly poorer 10 year freedom from biochemical recurrence rate, 54.8% if either or both factors were present, while UIR patients without these specific factors had a 94.4% 10-year freedom from biochemical recurrence rate. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 GU toxicity modestly increased over time – 16.3% at 5 years increased to 19.2% at 10 years-- while the incidence of grade 3+ GU and GI toxicity remained low and stable to 10 years - 2.6% and 0%, respectively. The grade 2 GI toxicity incidence also remained low and stable to 10 years – 4.1% with no further events after year 5. Conclusion This HDR-like SBRT regimen prescribing 38 Gy/4 fractions but delivering much higher intraprostatic doses on a daily basis is safe and effective. This treatment achieves a median PSA nadir of <0.1 ng/mL and provides high long-term disease control rates without ADT except for a subgroup of unfavorable intermediate-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald B. Fuller
- CyberKnife Centers of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Donald B. Fuller, ; Ronald C. Chen,
| | - Tami Crabtree
- Advance Research Associates, Santa Clara, CA, United States
| | | | | | - Robert Pfeffer
- Benefis Sletten Cancer Institute, Great Falls, MT, United States
| | - James R. Gray
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Anuj Peddada
- Penrose-St. Francis Health Services, Colorado Springs, CO, United States
| | - Trevor J. Royce
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, United States
- *Correspondence: Donald B. Fuller, ; Ronald C. Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kissel M, Créhange G, Graff P. Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2226. [PMID: 35565355 PMCID: PMC9105931 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a valid option for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In randomized trials, it was found not inferior to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). It also compares favorably to brachytherapy (BT) even if level 1 evidence is lacking. However, BT remains a strong competitor, especially for young patients, as series with 10-15 years of median follow-up have proven its efficacy over time. SBRT will thus have to confirm its effectiveness over the long-term as well. SBRT has the advantage over BT of less acute urinary toxicity and, more hypothetically, less sexual impairment. Data are limited regarding SBRT for high-risk disease while BT, as a boost after EBRT, has demonstrated superiority against EBRT alone in randomized trials. However, patients should be informed of significant urinary toxicity. SBRT is under investigation in strategies of treatment intensification such as combination of EBRT plus SBRT boost or focal dose escalation to the tumor site within the prostate. Our goal was to examine respective levels of evidence of SBRT and BT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicity and quality of life, and to discuss strategies of treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; (M.K.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A comparative study of patient-reported outcomes after contemporary radiation techniques for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:164-172. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
9
|
Corkum MT, Achard V, Morton G, Zilli T. Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: How Far Can We Go? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:340-349. [PMID: 34961659 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Following adoption of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy as a standard for localised prostate cancer, ultrahypofractioned radiotherapy delivered in five to seven fractions is rapidly being embraced by clinical practice and international guidelines. However, the question remains: how low can we go? Can radiotherapy for prostate cancer be delivered in fewer than five fractions? The current review summarises the evidence that radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer can be safely and effectively delivered in fewer than five fractions using high dose rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy. We also discuss important lessons learned from the single-fraction high dose rate brachytherapy experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M T Corkum
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - V Achard
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - T Zilli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fredman E, Traughber B, Kharouta M, Podder T, Lo S, Ponsky L, MacLennan G, Paspulati R, Ellis B, Machtay M, Ellis R. Focal Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Correlative Pathological and Radiographic-Based Treatment Planning. Front Oncol 2021; 11:744130. [PMID: 34604088 PMCID: PMC8480263 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.744130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Advances in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) combining anatomic and functional imaging can accurately identify foci of adenocarcinoma within the prostate, offering the possibility of partial gland therapy. We performed tandem prospective pilot trials to investigate the feasibility of focal prostate SBRT (f-SBRT) based on correlating diagnostic mpMRI and biopsies with confirmatory pathology in treatment planning. Materials and Methods Patients with pathologic focal Gleason 6–7 disease and a corresponding PIRADS 4–5 lesion on mpMRI underwent targeted and comprehensive biopsies using MRI/ultrasound fusion under electromagnetic sensor navigation. After rigorous analysis for imaging biopsy concordance, five of 18 patients were eligible to proceed to f-SBRT. Chi-squared test was used for differences from expected outcomes, and concordance was estimated with binomial distribution theory and Wilson’s method. Results Six patients had Gleason 6 and 12 had Gleason 3 + 4 disease (mean PSA: 5.8 ng/ml, range: 2.2–8.4). Absolute concordance was 43.8% (95% CI: 0.20, 0.64). Patterns of discordance included additional sites of ipsilateral disease, bilateral disease, and negative target. Five were upstaged to a new NCCN risk category necessitating treatment escalation. The five patients with concordant pathology completed three-fraction f-SBRT with sparing of the surrounding normal structures (including contralateral neurovascular bundle), with no reported grade 2+ toxicities and favorable PSA responses (mean: 41% decrease). Conclusions On our pilot trials of f-SBRT planning using rigorous imaging and pathology concordance, image-guided confirmatory biopsies frequently revealed additional disease, suggesting the need for caution in partial-gland therapy. For truly focal disease, f-SBRT provided excellent dosimetry, minimal toxicity, and encouraging biochemical response. Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02681614; NCT02163317.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisha Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Bryan Traughber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State University, Milton Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Michael Kharouta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Tarun Podder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Simon Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Lee Ponsky
- Department of Urology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Gregory MacLennan
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Raj Paspulati
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Bradley Ellis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State University, Milton Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Rodney Ellis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State University, Milton Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Prospective validation of stringent dose constraints for prostatic stereotactic radiation monotherapy: results of a single-arm phase II toxicity-oriented trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1001-1009. [PMID: 34424351 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01832-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are no safety-focused trials on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. This prospective 3‑year phase II trial used binomial law to validate the safety and efficacy of SBRT with stringent organ at risk dose constraints that nevertheless permitted high planning target volume doses. METHODS All consecutive ≥ 70-year-old patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent SBRT between 2014 and 2018 at the National Radiotherapy Center in Luxembourg were included. Patients with low Cancer of Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) scores (0-2) and intermediate scores (3-5) received 36.25 Gy. High-risk (6-10) patients received 37.5 Gy. Radiation was delivered in 5 fractions over 9 days with Cyberknife-M6™ (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Primary study outcome was Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAEv4) genitourinary and rectal toxicity scores at last follow-up. Based on binomial law, SRBT was considered safe in this cohort of 110 patients if there were ≤ 2 severe toxicity (CTCAEv4 grade ≥ 3) cases. Secondary outcomes were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and patient quality of life (QOL), as determined by the IPPS and the Urinary Incontinence QOL questionnaire. RESULTS The first 110 patients who were accrued in a total cohort of 150 patients were included in this study and had a median follow-up of 36 months. Acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity never occurred. One transient late grade 3 case was observed. Thus, our SBRT program had an estimated severe toxicity rate of < 5% and was safe at the p < 0.05 level. Overall bPFS was 90%. QOL did not change relative to baseline. CONCLUSION The trial validated our SBRT regimen since it was both safe and effective.
Collapse
|
12
|
Smith BR, Strand SA, Dunkerley D, Flynn RT, Besemer AE, Kos JD, Caster JM, Wagner BS, Kim Y. Implementation of a real-time, ultrasound-guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:189-214. [PMID: 34312999 PMCID: PMC8425918 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
This work presents a comprehensive commissioning and workflow development process of a real-time, ultrasound (US) image-guided treatment planning system (TPS), a stepper and a US unit. To adequately benchmark the system, commissioning tasks were separated into (1) US imaging, (2) stepper mechanical, and (3) treatment planning aspects. Quality assurance US imaging measurements were performed following the AAPM TG-128 and GEC-ESTRO recommendations and consisted of benchmarking the spatial resolution, accuracy, and low-contrast detectability. Mechanical tests were first used to benchmark the electronic encoders within the stepper and were later expanded to evaluate the needle free length calculation accuracy. Needle reconstruction accuracy was rigorously evaluated at the treatment planning level. The calibration length of each probe was redundantly checked between the calculated and measured needle free length, which was found to be within 1 mm for a variety of scenarios. Needle placement relative to a reference fiducial and coincidence of imaging coordinate origins were verified to within 1 mm in both sagittal and transverse imaging planes. The source strength was also calibrated within the interstitial needle and was found to be 1.14% lower than when measured in a plastic needle. Dose calculations in the TPS and secondary dose calculation software were benchmarked against manual TG-43 calculations. Calculations among the three calculation methods agreed within 1% for all calculated points. Source positioning and dummy coincidence was tested following the recommendations of the TG-40 report. Finally, the development of the clinical workflow, checklists, and planning objectives are discussed and included within this report. The commissioning of real-time, US-guided HDR prostate systems requires careful consideration among several facets including the image quality, dosimetric, and mechanical accuracy. The TPS relies on each of these components to develop and administer a treatment plan, and as such, should be carefully examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake R Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sarah A Strand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - David Dunkerley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ryan T Flynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Abigail E Besemer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jennifer D Kos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Joseph M Caster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Bonnie S Wagner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Yusung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reynaud T, Hathout L, Carignan D, Barkati M, Martin AG, Foster W, Lacroix F, Delouya G, Taussky D, Morton G, Vigneault E. PSA outcomes and late toxicity of single-fraction HDR brachytherapy and LDR brachytherapy as monotherapy in localized prostate cancer: A phase 2 randomized pilot study. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1090-1098. [PMID: 34238688 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the PSA outcomes and the late patient's reported health related quality of life (HRQOL) and toxicity after single-fraction High-Dose-Rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and Low-Dose-Rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for prostate cancer. METHODS Men with low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer across 3 centres were randomized between monotherapy brachytherapy with either Iodine-125 LDRB or 19 Gy single-fraction HDRB. Biochemical outcomes were evaluated using the Phoenix definition, PSA nadir and absolute PSA value <0.4 ng/mL. Toxicities and HRQOL were recorded at 24 and 36 months. RESULTS A total of 31 patients were randomized, 15 in the LDRB arm and 16 patients in the HDRB arm. After a median follow-up of 45(36-53) months, 3 patients in the HDRB arm experienced biochemical failure (p = 0.092). Nineteen Gy single-fraction HDRB was associated with significantly higher PSA nadir compared to LDRB (1.02 ± 0.66vs 0.25 ± 0.39, p < 0.0001). Moreover, a significantly larger proportion of patients in the LDRB group had a PSA <0.4 ng/mL (13/15 vs 2/16, p < 0.0001). For late Genito-Urinary, Gastro-Intestinal, and sexual toxicities at 24 and 36 months, no significant differences were found between the 2 arms. As for HRQOL, the IPSS and EPIC-26 urinary irritative score were significantly better for patients treated with HDRB over the first 36 months post-treatment (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively), reflecting superior HRQOL. CONCLUSION HDRB resulted in superior HRQOL in the irritative urinary domain compared to LDRB. PSA nadir was significantly lower in the LDRB group and a higher proportion of patients in the LDRB group reached PSA <0.4 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Reynaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada; Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Lara Hathout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Damien Carignan
- Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Maroie Barkati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - André-Guy Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada; Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - William Foster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Frédéric Lacroix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Guila Delouya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Daniel Taussky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Vigneault
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada; Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Strouthos I, Karagiannis E, Zamboglou N, Ferentinos K. High-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Rationale, current applications, and clinical outcome. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 5:e1450. [PMID: 34164950 PMCID: PMC8789612 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR BRT) has been enjoying rapid acceptance as a treatment modality offered to selected prostate cancer patients devoid of risk group, employed either in monotherapy setting or combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and is currently one of the most active clinical research areas. Recent findings This review encompasses all the current evidence to support the use of HDR BRT in various clinical scenario and shines light to the HDR BRT rationale, as an ultimately conformal dose delivery method enabling safe dose escalation to the prostate. Conclusion Valid long‐term data, both in regard to the oncologic outcomes and toxicity profile, support the current clinical indication spectrum of HDR BRT. At the same time, this serves as solid, rigid ground for emerging therapeutic applications, allowing the technique to remain in the spotlight alongside stereotactic radiosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Clinical Faculty, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Efstratios Karagiannis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Clinical Faculty, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Nikolaos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Clinical Faculty, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Clinical Faculty, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Miyazaki Y, Takenaka Y, Noda Y, Kawai N, Yoshikawa T, Wakamiya T, Hara I, Sonomura T. Reduction of toxicity in brachytherapy using a new technique. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:866-872. [PMID: 33896731 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to elucidate the usefulness of a dose evaluation method for reducing late genitourinary (GU) toxicity in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS GU toxicity was scored in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The prostatic urethra was divided into three segments (base = B, midgland = M, apex = A), which were subclassified into seven subgroups (B, M, A, BM, BA, MA, BMA) using a D10% color map of the urethra. Significance testing was conducted on urethral D0.1% and D10% among the seven subgroups. Grade < 2 GU toxicity was also implemented. RESULTS Data of 174 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HDR-BT combined with external beam radiotherapy between November 2011 and July 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Median age was 74 (53-84) years, and median followup period was 44 (6-69) months. The number of Grade < 2 and Grade ≥ 2 toxicity was significantly different in the M subgroup than in the other subgroups (p < 0.05), suggesting increased radioresistance in the midgland urethra. CONCLUSIONS A high-dose-area evaluation method using a urethral D10% color map may be helpful in reducing late GU toxicity in HDR-BT for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Miyazaki
- Department of Central Radiology, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.
| | - Yukiho Takenaka
- Department of Central Radiology, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Noda
- Department of Radiology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama
| | - Nobuyuki Kawai
- Department of Radiology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama
| | | | - Takahito Wakamiya
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan
| | - Isao Hara
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Sonomura
- Department of Radiology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Patient-reported Quality of Life After SBRT, LDR, and HDR Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Comparison of Outcomes. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:131-136. [PMID: 33577175 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to compare changes in patient-reported quality of life (PRQOL) following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), high dose rate (HDR), and low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Sexual Health Inventory For Men (SHIM), and Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) were prospectively collected for men with low/intermediate-risk cancer treated at a single institution. We used Generalized Estimating Equations to identify associations between variables and early (3 to 6 mo) or late (1 to 2 y) PRQOL scores. Minimally important differences (MID) were compared with assess clinical relevance. RESULTS A total of 342 LDR, 159 HDR, and 112 SBRT patients treated from 2001 to 2018 were eligible. Gleason score, PSA, and age were lower among LDR patients compared with HDR/SBRT. Unadjusted baseline IPSS score was similar among all groups. Adjusted IPSS worsened at all time points compared with baseline after LDR/HDR. At early/late time points, rates of IPSS MID after LDR were higher compared to HDR/SBRT. There were no IPSS differences between SBRT and HDR. All modalities showed early and late SHIM worsening. There were no temporal differences in SHIM between SBRT and brachytherapy. There were no differences in EPIC subdomains between HDR and SBRT. Bowel symptoms worsened early after SBRT, whereas urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms worsened late after HDR. Among all domains, MID after SBRT and HDR were similar. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of patients treated with modern radiotherapy techniques, HDR and SBRT resulted in clinically meaningful improved urinary PRQOL compared with LDR.
Collapse
|
17
|
Martell K, Kollmeier MA. Complications and side effects of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:966-975. [PMID: 33612395 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe technical challenges and complications encountered during and after high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and review management of these complications. METHODS AND MATERIALS The authors performed a systematic review of the literature on toxicities encountered after prostate HDR-BT +/- external beam radiotherapy. A total of 397 studies were identified, of which 64 were included. A focused review of literature regarding the management of acute and late toxicities also performed. RESULTS Most acute toxicities include grade 0-2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity. Overall, Grade 3+ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity after HDR-BT was low [genitourinary: 0-1%; gastrointestinal 0-3%]. Rates of fistula formation were <1%, and radiation cystitis/proctitis were <14% and more commonly reported in cohorts treated with HDR-BT boost and external beam radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS HDR-BT both as monotherapy or combined with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer is well tolerated. Serious complications are rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Martell
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer using three different doses - 14 years of single-centre experience. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:533-539. [PMID: 33437300 PMCID: PMC7787203 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.101685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC) treated with 3D conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as monotherapy. Material and methods From March 2004 to November 2017, 277 men with LPC underwent 3D conformal HDR-BT as monotherapy, with a temporary implant. The dose prescription was: 38 Gy in 4 fractions (149 patients), 27 Gy in 2 fractions (41 patients), and 19-20 Gy in a single fraction (87 patients). Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated. Acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity assessment were performed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Results The mean age was 67 (range, 47-81) years. Overall, 145 patients were low-risk, 116 intermediate-risk, and 16 high-risk prostate cancer. After a median follow-up of six years (range, 6-160 months), bPFS, PFS, and CSS were 81%, 96%, and 97%, respectively. Dose prescription, initial prostate specific antigen (iPSA) ≥ 9,5 ng/ml, and high-risk disease resulted in prognostic factors regarding bPFS. Only G2-G3 acute or late GI and GU toxicities were observed. Conclusions HDR-BT as monotherapy is a valid and safe treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. After a long follow-up, patients receiving 19-20 Gy in a single fraction had a lower biochemical control rate compared to patients receiving 38 Gy in 4 fractions or 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Randomized prospective trials with a longer follow-up are necessary to confirm our results, and define total doses and dose per fraction for HDR-BT in patients with LPC.
Collapse
|
19
|
Harris AA, Wu M, Deirmenjian JM, Shea SM, Kang H, Patel R, Fielder D, Mysz ML, Harkenrider MM, Solanki AA. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning: The impact on patient-reported health-related quality of life. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:66-74. [PMID: 33160849 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy uses volumetric imaging for treatment planning. Our institution transitioned from computed tomography (CT)-based planning to MRI-based planning with the hypothesis that improved visualization could reduce treatment-related toxicity. This study aimed to compare the patient-reported health-related quality of life (hrQOL) and physician-graded toxicity outcomes of CT-based and MRI-based HDR prostate brachytherapy. METHODS From 2016 to 2019, 122 patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy. Patients underwent CT only or CT and MRI imaging for treatment planning and were grouped per treatment planning imaging modality. Patient-reported hrQOL in the genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual domains was assessed using International Prostate Symptom Score and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form-26 questionnaires. Baseline characteristics, changes in hrQOL scores, and physician-graded toxicities were compared between groups. RESULTS The median follow-up was 18 months. Patient-reported GU, GI, and sexual scores worsened after treatment but returned toward baseline over time. The CT cohort had a lower baseline mean International Prostate Symptom Score (5.8 vs. 7.8, p = 0.03). The other patient-reported GU and GI scores did not differ between groups. Overall, sexual scores were similar between the CT and MRI cohorts (p = 0.08) but favored the MRI cohort at later follow-up with a smaller decrease in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form-26 sexual score from baseline at 18 months (4.9 vs. 19.8, p = 0.05). Maximum physician-graded GU, GI, and sexual toxicity rates of grade ≥2 were 68%, 3%, and 53%, respectively, with no difference between the cohorts (p = 0.31). CONCLUSION Our study shows that CT- and MRI-based HDR brachytherapy results in similar rates of GU and GI toxicity. MRI-based planning may result in improved erectile function recovery compared with CT-based planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Megan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Jacqueline M Deirmenjian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Steven M Shea
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Hyejoo Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Rakesh Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Derek Fielder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Michael L Mysz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Matthew M Harkenrider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Abhishek A Solanki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rajković KM, Dabić-Stanković K, Stanković J, Aćimović M, Đukanović N, Nikolin B. Modelling and optimisation of treatment parameters in high-dose-rate mono brachytherapy for localised prostate carcinoma using a multilayer artificial neural network and a genetic algorithm: Pilot study. Comput Biol Med 2020; 126:104045. [PMID: 33099047 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-dose-rate mono brachytherapy (HDR-MB) is employed in the treatment of prostate carcinoma (CaP). As an ideal plan of CaP brachytherapy cannot be created, it is necessary to identify a reliable tool to optimise the parameters of HDR-MB. This paper applies a multilayer artificial neural network (MANN) and a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimise brachytherapy parameters based on an individual dose-volumetric analysis. METHODS Patients with localised CaP of various risks were treated with HDR-MB. Consecutive levels of the biochemical control parameter (prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir) have been collected after completion of HDR-MB in the range 2-9 years. The Kaplan-Meier regression analysis of biochemical-free survival (BFS) was applied. The clinical risk of recurrent CaP (RCaP), the therapy dose (TD), TD coverage index (CI100%) and PSA nadir were modelled using the MANN and GA. RESULTS In the low-risk group, BFS was achieved in 100% of treated patients, while in the group of patients with high risk, BFS was achieved in 95.8% of treated patients. The MANN-GA model optimises a TD of 47.3 Gy and CI100% of 1.14 as well as a TD of 50.4 Gy and CI100% of 1.6 for the low-risk group and high-risk group, respectively, of localised CaP. The optimised PSA nadir was 0.047 and 0.25 ng cm-3 for low-risk group and high-risk group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The developed MANN-GA model presents a method for optimising the treatment parameters in radiation therapy, which could be a valuable tool in planning of the HDR-MB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Nina Đukanović
- High Medical School "Milutin Milanković", Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Borislava Nikolin
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Huang-Tiel HJ, Otto I, Golka K, Selinski S, Koswig S, Bathe K, Hallmann S, Ecke TH. Health-related quality of life and rates of toxicity after high-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer. Investig Clin Urol 2020; 61:250-259. [PMID: 32377600 PMCID: PMC7189115 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.3.250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a common treatment option for locally advanced prostate cancer. Quality of life is an important factor when discussing therapy options for high-risk prostate cancer. This study evaluated adverse effects and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Materials and Methods Ninety male patients (median age, 71 years; range, 50 to 79 years) with high-risk prostate cancer underwent HDR-BT after EBRT between December 2009 and January 2017 with a median follow-up of 43 months. A total of 57 patients (69.5%) answered the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire (QLQ-C30; ver. 3.0), and 8 patients died during follow-up. In order to put the results of this study in context, we compared the results with reference data from the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Correlations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, International Prostate Symptom Score, and HRQOL measures were calculated. Results The study participants reported better physical functioning and better global health compared with the reference data, but worse social, role, and cognitive functioning. We found negative statistically significant correlations between the last-measured PSA value and social functioning (p>0.01), cognitive functioning, pain, and constipation (all p<0.05). Toxicity rates were 10.0% for gastrointestinal and 12.2% for genitourinary adverse effects. All reported complications for toxicity were Grade I. Conclusions The described therapy results in high biochemical control rates with minimal adverse effects. Compared with reference groups, the HRQOL of this study cohort was acceptable. PSA values during follow-up seem to be a possible indicator to influence HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Juan Huang-Tiel
- Department of Neurology/Emergency Unit, Vivantes Hospital Spandau, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabella Otto
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Golka
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at TU Dortmund (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany
| | - Silvia Selinski
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at TU Dortmund (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany
| | - Stephan Koswig
- Department of Radio-Oncology, HELIOS Hospital, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Kathrin Bathe
- Department of Radio-Oncology, HELIOS Hospital, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
A radiobiological study of the schemes with a low number of fractions in high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:193-200. [PMID: 32395145 PMCID: PMC7207227 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.94492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Schemes with high doses per fraction and small number of fractions are commonly used in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer. Our aim was to analyze the differences between published clinical results and the predictions of radiobiological models for absorbed dose required in a single fraction monotherapy HDR-BT. Material and methods Published HDR-BT clinical results for low- and intermediate-risk patients with prostate cancer were revised. For 13 clinical studies with 16 fractionation schedules between 1 and 9 fractions, a dose-response relation in terms of the biochemical control probability (BC) was established using Monte Carlo-based statistical methods. Results We obtained a value of α/β = 22.8 Gy (15.1-60.2 Gy) (95% CI) much larger than the values in the range 1.5-3.0 Gy that are usually considered to compare the results of different fractionation schemes in prostate cancer radiotherapy using doses per fraction below 6 Gy. The doses in a single fraction producing BC = 90% and 95% were 22.3 Gy (21.5-24.2 Gy) and 24.3 Gy (23.0-27.9 Gy), respectively. Conclusions The α/β obtained in our analysis of 22.8 Gy for a range of dose per fraction between 6 and 20.5 Gy was much greater than the one currently estimated for prostate cancer using low doses per fraction. This high value of α/β explains reasonably well the data available in the region of high doses per fraction considered.
Collapse
|
23
|
Tharmalingam H, Tsang Y, Ostler P, Wylie J, Bahl A, Lydon A, Ahmed I, Elwell C, Nikapota AR, Hoskin PJ. Single dose high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as monotherapy for localised prostate cancer: Early results of a UK national cohort study. Radiother Oncol 2020; 143:95-100. [PMID: 32044166 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HDR brachytherapy alone is effective for the treatment of localised prostate cancer when given in 2-4 or more fractions. Single dose treatment has been explored in small cohort studies to date. This paper reports a large patient population with localised prostate cancer treated with single dose HDR brachytherapy delivering 19 Gy providing early outcome data from this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seven centres across the UK collaborated in this national protocol to deliver 19 Gy to the PTV defined by the prostate capsule and a 3 mm expansion with clearly defined planning constraints for the urethra and rectum. Entry criteria allowed all risk groups provided PSA ≤40 µg/L and staging investigations were negative for metastases. The primary end point was biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) defined using the Phoenix definition. Toxicity was measured using CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS A total of 441 patients were entered with median follow up 26 months (range 2-56). Median age was 73 (range 54-84) and 10% were low risk, 65% intermediate risk and 25% high risk. ADT was received by 37.6% overall and 90% of high risk patients for a median period of 6 months. Three year bRFS was overall 88%: this was 100% in low risk, 86% in intermediate risk and 75% in high risk. Only Gleason score was an independent predictor of bRFS. Relapse in 25 patients was assessed radiologically and occurred in the prostate in 15 of these, 11 of whom had localised prostate relapse only. Acute toxicity was low with no grade 3 or 4 events; there were two cases of late urinary stricture and two grade 3 late rectal events. CONCLUSION This is the largest cohort of single dose HDR brachytherapy patients treated with a single dose published to date. It shows that with 19 Gy there is 100% bRFS at 3 years in low risk patients but results in intermediate and high risk groups are less encouraging falling to 86% and 75% at 3 years with relapse predominantly in the prostate. Limited by the short follow up period of this study, the long-term outcomes of this single dose HDR approach remains uncertain. It is important to have close ongoing surveillance of this cohort as the data matures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Amit Bahl
- Bristol Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna Lydon
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospitals, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | | | - Peter J Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tsang YM, Vignarajah D, Mcwilliam A, Tharmalingam H, Lowe G, Choudhury A, Hoskin P. A pilot study on dosimetric and radiomics analysis of urethral strictures following HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190760. [PMID: 31778319 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A cohort of high dose-rate (HDR) monotherapy patients was analyzed to (i) establish the frequency of non-malignant urethral stricture; (ii) explore the relation between stricture formation with the dose distribution along the length of the urethra, and MRI radiomics features of the prostate gland. METHODS A retrospective review of treatment records of patients who received 19 Gy single fraction of HDR brachytherapy (BT) was carried out. A matched pair analysis used one control for each stricture case matched with pre-treatment International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score, number of needles used and clinical target volume volume for each stricture case identified.For all data sets, pre-treatment T2 weighted MRI images were used to define regions of interests along the urethra and within the whole prostate gland. MRI textural radiomics features-energy, contrast and homogeneity were selected. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to investigate significant differences in dosimetric parameters and MRI radiomics feature values between cases and controls. RESULTS From Nov 2010 to July 2017, there were 178 patients treated with HDR BT delivering 19 Gy in a single dose. With a median follow-up of 28.2 months, a total of 5/178 (3%) strictures were identified.10 patients were included in the matched pair analysis. The urethral dosimetric parameters investigated were not statistically different between cases and controls (p > 0.05). With regards to MRI radiomics feature analysis, significant differences were found in contrast and homogeneity between cases and controls (p < 0.05). However, this did not apply to the energy feature (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION In this matched pair analysis, no association between post-treatment stricture and urethral dosimetry was identified. Our study generated a preliminary clinical hypothesis suggesting that the MRI radiomics features of homogeneity and contrast of the prostate gland can potentially identify patients who develop strictures after HDR BT. Although the sample size is small, this warrants further validation in a larger patient cohort. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Urethral stricture has been reported as a specific late effect with prostate HDR brachytherapy. Our study reported a relatively low stricture rate of 3% and no association between post-treatment stricture and urethral dosimetry was identified. MRI radiomics features can potentially identify patients who are more prone to develop strictures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yat Man Tsang
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alan Mcwilliam
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gerry Lowe
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom.,Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tien CJ, Carlson DJ, Nath R, Chen ZJ. High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: The impact of cellular repair and source decay. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:701-710. [PMID: 31109870 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This work quantifies the influence of intrafraction DNA damage repair and cellular repopulation on biologically effective dose (BED) in Ir-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. In addition, it examines the effect of source-decay-induced BED variation for patients treated at different time points in a source exchange cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS Current fractionation schemes are based on simplified-form BED = nd(1 + d/(α/β)), which assumes that intrafraction repair, interfraction repair, and repopulation are negligible. We took accepted radiobiological parameters of Tk, Tp, and α from the recommendations of the AAPM TG-137, and recalculated the full-form BED. Fraction times were normalized to require 15 min for 20 Gy at 10 Ci. Calculations were carried out for both α/β = 1.5 and 3 Gy. RESULTS After accounting for intrafraction repair, interfraction repair, and/or repopulation, full-form BED calculations showed significant values, as compared with simplified-form BED. For 1-fraction 20 Gy fractionation, the full-form BED was only 64-82% of the simplified-form BED. Dose protraction effects were milder for smaller prescriptions (6 Gy/Fx), where full form was 87-94%. With regard to source decay, BED varied >20% for patients treated at the beginning and the end of a source exchange cycle for 20 Gy single-fraction prescription. CONCLUSIONS Repair and repopulation can be significant in monotherapy high-dose-rate for prostate cancer. As fractionation schemes are established, the simplified BED calculation may not be appropriate. Investigators should consider evaluating BED as a range rather than a discrete value when presenting results unless source activity is explicitly incorporated as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Tien
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
| | - David J Carlson
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ravinder Nath
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Zhe Jay Chen
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hathout L, Mahmoud O, Wang Y, Vergalasova I, Barkati M, Després P, Martin AG, Foster W, Lacroix F, Delouya G, Taussky D, Morton G, Vigneault E. A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:631-640. [PMID: 31673656 PMCID: PMC6817536 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) versus low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for localized prostate cancer in a multi-institutional phase 2 randomized trial. Methods and Materials Men with favorable-risk prostate cancer were randomized between monotherapy brachytherapy with either Iodine-125 LDRB to 144 Gy or single-fraction Iridium-192 HDRB to 19 Gy. HRQOL and urinary toxicity were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 scoring and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Independent samples t test and mixed effects modeling were performed for continuous variables. Time to IPSS resolution, defined as return to its baseline score ±5 points, was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimator curves with the log-rank test. A multiple-comparison adjusted P value of ≤.05 was considered significant. Results LDRB and HDRB were performed in 15 and 16 patients, respectively, for a total of 31 patients. At 3 months, patients treated with LDRB had a higher IPSS score (mean, 15.5 vs 6.0, respectively; P = .003) and lower EPIC urinary irritative score (mean, 69.2 vs 85.3, respectively; P = .037) compared with those who received HDRB. On repeated measures at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, the IPSS (P = .003) and EPIC urinary irritative scores (P = .019) were significantly better in the HDR arm, translating into a lower urinary toxicity profile. There were no significant differences in the EPIC urinary incontinence, sexual, or bowel habit scores between the 2 groups at any measured time point. Time to IPSS resolution was significantly shorter in the HDRB group (mean, 2.0 months) compared with the LDRB group (mean, 6.0 months; P = .028). Conclusions HDRB monotherapy is a promising modality associated with a lower urinary toxicity profile and higher HRQOL in the first 12 months compared with LDRB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Hathout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Omar Mahmoud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Yaqun Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Irina Vergalasova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Maroie Barkati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe Després
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - André-Guy Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - William Foster
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Frédéric Lacroix
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Guila Delouya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Daniel Taussky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Vigneault
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Poder J, Cutajar D, Guatelli S, Petasecca M, Howie A, Bucci J, Carrara M, Rosenfeld A. A Monte Carlo study on the feasibility of real-time in vivo source tracking during ultrasound based HDR prostate brachytherapy treatments. Phys Med 2019; 59:30-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
28
|
Fuller DB, Falchook AD, Crabtree T, Kane BL, Medbery CA, Underhill K, Gray JR, Peddada A, Chen RC. Phase 2 Multicenter Trial of Heterogeneous-dosing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: 5-year Outcomes. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 1:540-547. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
29
|
A risk-based approach to development of ultrasound-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy quality management. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:788-793. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
30
|
Maenhout M, Peters M, Moerland MA, Meijer RP, van den Bosch MAAJ, Frank SJ, Nguyen PL, van Vulpen M, van der Voort van Zyp JRN. MRI guided focal HDR brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: Toxicity, biochemical outcome and quality of life. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:554-560. [PMID: 30131183 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe toxicity, biochemical outcome and quality of life after MRI guided focal high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in a single fraction of 19 Gy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between May 2013 and April 2016, 30 patients were treated by MRI-guided focal HDR-BT. Patients with visible tumour on MRI were included. All patients were ≥65 years, T-stage <T3, Gleason ≤7, PSA <10 ng/mL and IPSS <15. Focal irradiation was delivered in a single fraction of 19 Gy to the D95 of the clinical target volume. Toxicity was reported using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix criteria and quality of life was measured using validated questionnaires. RESULTS Median follow up was 24 months. One patient developed a grade 2 and 3 GU toxicity after treatment. In the other 29 patients, no grade 2 or higher perioperative complications occurred. Five patients developed a biochemical recurrence. For all measured time points, there was no statistically significant deterioration in quality of life. CONCLUSION Focal MRI guided HDR-BT confers low toxicity rates and maintains quality of life. Biochemical recurrence is rather high, 5 patients developed a biochemical recurrence according to the Phoenix definition. Longer evaluation of these patients is necessary and caution is warranted before implementing focal HDR-BT in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Metha Maenhout
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, the Netherlands
| | - Max Peters
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, the Netherlands
| | - Marinus A Moerland
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, the Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Urology, the Netherlands
| | | | - Steven J Frank
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Houston, USA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Boston, USA
| | - Marco van Vulpen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Mendez LC, Morton GC. High dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:357-370. [PMID: 30050796 PMCID: PMC6043748 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy involves delivery of a high dose of radiation to the cancer with great sparing of surrounding organs at risk. Prostate cancer is thought to be particularly sensitive to radiation delivered at high dose-rate or at high dose per fraction. The rapid delivery and high conformality of dose results in lower toxicity than that seen with low dose-rate (LDR) implants. HDR combined with external beam radiotherapy results in higher cancer control rate than external beam only, and should be offered to eligible high and intermediate risk patients. While a variety of dose and fractionations have been used, a single 15 Gy HDR combined with 40-50 Gy external beam radiotherapy results in a disease-free survival of over 90% for intermediate risk and 80% for high risk. HDR monotherapy in two or more fractions (e.g., 27 Gy in 2 fractions or 34.5 Gy in 3) is emerging as a viable alternative to LDR brachytherapy for low and low-intermediate risk patients, and has less toxicity. The role of single fraction monotherapy to a dose of 19-20 Gy is evolving, with some conflicting data to date. HDR should also be considered as a salvage approach for recurrent disease following previous external beam radiotherapy. A particular advantage of HDR in this setting is the ease of delivering focal treatments, which combined with modern imaging allows focal dose escalation with minimal toxicity. Trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) based planning is replacing CT-based planning as the technique of choice as it minimizes or eliminates the need to move the patient between insertion, planning and treatment delivery, thus ensuring high accuracy and reproducibility of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas C Mendez
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gerard C Morton
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Early toxicity and health-related quality of life results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:524-529. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2017] [Revised: 01/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
34
|
Ávila M, Patel L, López S, Cortés-Sanabria L, Garin O, Pont À, Ferrer F, Boladeras A, Zamora V, Fosså S, Storås AH, Sanda M, Serra-Sutton V, Ferrer M. Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 66:23-44. [PMID: 29673922 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this systematic review is to assess the impact of primary treatments with curative intention in patients with localized prostate cancer, measured with Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs), and to examine differences among modalities within treatments. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search for January 2005-March 2017 following PRISMA guidelines, including longitudinal studies measuring disease-specific PROs in localized prostate cancer patients with a follow-up from pre- to post-treatment (≥1 year). Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The study is registered in PROSPERO: CRD42015019747. RESULTS Of 148 identified studies, 60 were included in the meta-analyses. At the 1st year, radical prostatectomy patients showed small urinary irritative-obstructive improvement (0.37SD 95%CI 0.30, 0.45), but large deterioration for sexual function and incontinence with high heterogeneity (I2 = 77% and 93%). Moderate worsening in external radiotherapy patients for sexual function (-0.46SD 95%CI -0.55, -0.36), small urinary incontinence (-0.16SD 95%CI -0.23, -0.09) and bowel impairment (-0.31SD 95%CI -0.39, -0.23). Brachytherapy patients presented small deterioration in urinary incontinence (-0.29SD 95%CI -0.39, -0.19), irritative obstructive symptoms (-0.35SD 95%CI -0.47, -0.23), sexual function (-0.12SD 95%CI -0.24, -0.002), and bowel bother (-0.27SD 95%CI -0.42, -0.11). These patterns persisted up to the 5th year. High-intensity focused ultrasound and active surveillance only have results at 1st year, showing no statistically significant worsening. CONCLUSIONS No remarkable differences in PRO appeared between modalities within each treatment. Nowadays, available evidence supports brachytherapy as possible alternative to radical prostatectomy for patients seeking an attempted curative treatment limiting the risk for urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Ávila
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Silvia López
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Cortés-Sanabria
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Renales, Hospital de Especialidades, CMNO, IMSS, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - Olatz Garin
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Àngels Pont
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
| | | | | | - Victor Zamora
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona University UB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sophie Fosså
- Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne H Storås
- Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Martin Sanda
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, United States
| | - Vicky Serra-Sutton
- Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
| | - Montse Ferrer
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Strouthos I, Tselis N, Chatzikonstantinou G, Butt S, Baltas D, Bon D, Milickovic N, Zamboglou N. High dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 126:270-277. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
36
|
Gomez-Iturriaga A, Casquero F, Pijoan JI, Minguez P, Espinosa JM, Irasarri A, Bueso A, Cacicedo J, Buchser D, Bilbao P. Health-related-quality-of-life and toxicity after single fraction 19 Gy high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: Phase II trial. Radiother Oncol 2017; 126:278-282. [PMID: 29153462 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety, tolerance and impact on health-related-quality-of-life (HRQoL) of the high-dose-rate brachytherapy of 19 Gy (BRT-HDR-19 Gy) single fraction in prostate cancer. METHODS From January 2014 to July 2016, 43 patients with low/intermediate risk were treated with BRT-HDR-19 Gy. The patients were monitored prospectively for toxicity and HRQoL. RESULTS The median age, initial PSA and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were 71 years (55-78), 7.0 ng/mL (4.2-17.8) and 5 (0-14) respectively. 44% were low-risk and 56% intermediate-risk. Median CTV-V100 (where Vn is the fractional volume of the organ that receives n% of the prescribed dose) was 96.5%, Urethral-Dmax 106% and rectum-2 cc (the dose to 2 cc of rectal wall) 53%. After a median follow-up of 20 months (4-26), acute grade-2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurred in 4 patients (9%) and none presented acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Similarly, four patients (9%) presented late GU grade-2 toxicity. No grade-3 toxicity occurred. In terms of HRQoL, there was a statistically significant decline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary urgency/obstructive domain at month 3 (p = 0.047), and returned to baseline by month 6. Mean EPIC urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains did not present significant post BRT-HDR-19 Gy changes. Patients rated their satisfaction at 6 months as "very-satisfied" (23%) or "extremely-satisfied" (77%). CONCLUSIONS BRT-HDR-19 Gy demonstrates excellent results in terms of toxicity, tolerance, safety, patient satisfaction and HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Radiation Oncology, Barakaldo, Spain.
| | - Francisco Casquero
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Radiation Oncology, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Jose Ignacio Pijoan
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Barakaldo, Spain; Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Minguez
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Radiation Oncology, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Jose Maria Espinosa
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Radiation Oncology, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Ana Irasarri
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Andrea Bueso
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Radiation Oncology, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Jon Cacicedo
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Radiation Oncology, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - David Buchser
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Radiation Oncology, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Pedro Bilbao
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Health Research Institute, Radiation Oncology, Barakaldo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dadkhah H, Hopfensperger KM, Kim Y, Wu X, Flynn RT. Multisource Rotating Shield Brachytherapy Apparatus for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:719-728. [PMID: 28843372 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose is to present a novel multisource rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT) apparatus for the simultaneous precise angular and linear positioning of partially shielded 153Gd brachytherapy sources in interstitial needles for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. It is designed to lower the dose to nearby healthy tissues, the urethra in particular, relative to conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS Following needle implantation through the patient template, an angular drive mechanism is docked to the patient template. Each needle is coupled to a multisource afterloader catheter by a connector passing through a shaft. The shafts are rotated about their axes by translating a moving template between 2 stationary templates. The shafts' surfaces and moving template holes are helically threaded with the same pattern such that translation of the moving template causes simultaneous rotation of the shafts. The rotation of each shaft is mechanically transmitted to the catheter-source-shield combination, inside the needles, via several key-keyway pairs. The catheter angles are simultaneously incremented throughout treatment, and only a single 360° rotation of all catheters is needed for a full treatment. For each rotation angle, source depth in each needle is controlled by a multisource afterloader, which is proposed as an array of belt-driven linear actuators, each of which drives a wire that controls catheter depth in a needle. RESULTS Treatment plans demonstrated that RSBT with the proposed apparatus reduced urethral D0.1cm3 (the minimum dose delivered to the hottest 0.1cm3 of the urethra) below that of conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy by 31% for urethral dose gradient volume within 3 mm of the urethra surface. Treatment time to deliver 20 Gy with the proposed multisource RSBT apparatus by use of nineteen 62.4-GBq 153Gd sources was 122 minutes. CONCLUSIONS The proposed RSBT delivery apparatus enables a mechanically feasible urethra-sparing treatment technique for prostate cancer in a clinically reasonable time frame.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Dadkhah
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | | | - Yusung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Ryan T Flynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Keam SP, Caramia F, Gamell C, Paul PJ, Arnau GM, Neeson PJ, Williams SG, Haupt Y. The Transcriptional Landscape of Radiation-Treated Human Prostate Cancer: Analysis of a Prospective Tissue Cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 100:188-198. [PMID: 29102647 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The resistance of prostate cancer to radiation therapy (RT) is a significant clinical issue and still largely unable to be guided by patient-specific molecular characteristics. The present study describes the gene expression changes induced in response to RT in human prostate tissue obtained from a prospective tissue acquisition study designed for radiobiology research. METHODS AND MATERIALS A prospective cohort of 5 men with intermediate-risk and clinically localized tumors were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy with 2 × 10-Gy fractions. Image-guided transperineal biopsy specimens were taken immediately before and 14 days after the first high-dose-rate brachytherapy fraction. Using genome-wide 3' RNA sequencing on total RNA extracted from 10 biopsy specimens, we obtained quantitative expression data for a median of 13,244 genes. We computed the fold-change information for each gene and extracted high-confidence lists of transcripts with either increased or decreased expression (≥1.5-fold) after radiation in ≥4 of the 5 patients. Several gene ontology analyses were then used to identify functionally enriched pathways. RESULTS The predominant change in response to RT was elevation of the transcript levels, including that of DNA damage binding protein 2 and p21, and collagens, laminins, and integrins. We observed strong upregulation of the p53 pathway, without observable dysregulation of p53 itself. Interstitial remodeling, extracellular matrix proteins, and focal adhesion pathways were also strongly upregulated, as was inflammation. Functional network analysis showed clustering of the changes inherent in apoptosis and programmed cell death, extracellular matrix organization, and immune regulation. CONCLUSIONS In the present prospective study of matched clinical tissues, we successfully recognized known radiation-sensitive transcriptional pathways and identified numerous other novel and significantly altered genes with no current association with RT. These data could be informative in the development of future personalized therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon P Keam
- Tumor Suppression Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Franco Caramia
- Tumor Suppression Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cristina Gamell
- Tumor Suppression Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Piotr J Paul
- Tumor Suppression Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gisela Mir Arnau
- Molecular Genomics Facility, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul J Neeson
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Immunology Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott G Williams
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Ygal Haupt
- Tumor Suppression Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ragab O, Banerjee R, Park SJ, Patel S, Zhang M, Wang J, Velez M, Demanes DJ, Kamrava M. Comparison of patient-reported acute urinary and sexual toxicity scores in a 6- versus 2-fraction course of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy monotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017; 62:109-115. [PMID: 28856847 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To identify differences in acute urinary and sexual toxicity between a 6-fraction and 2-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy regimen and correlate dosimetric constraints to short-term toxicity. METHODS A single institution retrospective study of 116 men with prostate cancer treated with HDR monotherapy from 2010 to 2015 was conducted. Eighty-one men had 7.25 Gy × 6-fractions and 35 men had 13.5 Gy × 2-fractions. Patients had two CT-planned implants spaced 1-2 weeks apart. Patient baseline characteristics, International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores were collected pre-treatment and 3, 6 and 12 months post-implantation. Mixed effect modelling was undertaken to compare baseline, 1-6 month and 7-12 month scores between groups. Poisson regression analysis was performed to correlate dosimetric constraints with acute toxicity. RESULTS There was no difference between baseline and post-implantation IPSS scores between 6-fraction and 2-fraction groups. SHIM scores for men treated with 6-fractions had a steeper decline at 1-6 months, but resolved at 7-12 months. Pre-treatment alpha-blocker use correlated with worse short-term acute urinary toxicity. Worsened SHIM score correlated with increasing age, diabetes mellitus and androgen-deprivation therapy. In a dosimetric analysis of outcomes, prostate V150 dose and bladder wall (D01.cc, D1cc, D2cc) dose correlated with increased IPSS score. CONCLUSION No increased acute genitourinary or sexual dysfunction has been observed in men when transitioning from 6-fraction to 2-fraction HDR monotherapy. A dosimetric correlation was found between the V150 and bladder wall doses for acute urinary toxicity. Future research should continue to standardize and validate dose constraints for prostate HDR monotherapy patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Ragab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Robyn Banerjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, USA
| | - Sang-June Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shyamal Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mingle Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jason Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maria Velez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David Jeffrey Demanes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hoskin P, Rojas A, Ostler P, Hughes R, Alonzi R, Lowe G. Single-dose high-dose-rate brachytherapy compared to two and three fractions for locally advanced prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:56-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Revised: 05/28/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
41
|
Shahid N, Loblaw A, Chung H, Cheung P, Szumacher E, Danjoux C, Sankreacha R, Zhang L, Deabreu A, Mamedov A, Morton G. Long-term Toxicity and Health-related Quality of Life after Single-fraction High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost and Hypofractionated External Beam Radiotherapy for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:412-420. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
42
|
High Dose Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: Review of the Current Status. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:401-411. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Revised: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
43
|
Zaorsky NG, Davis BJ, Nguyen PL, Showalter TN, Hoskin PJ, Yoshioka Y, Morton GC, Horwitz EM. The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2017; 14:415-439. [PMID: 28664931 PMCID: PMC7542347 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Brachytherapy (BT), using low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent seed implantation or high-dose-rate (HDR) temporary source implantation, is an acceptable treatment option for select patients with prostate cancer of any risk group. The benefits of HDR-BT over LDR-BT include the ability to use the same source for other cancers, lower operator dependence, and - typically - fewer acute irritative symptoms. By contrast, the benefits of LDR-BT include more favourable scheduling logistics, lower initial capital equipment costs, no need for a shielded room, completion in a single implant, and more robust data from clinical trials. Prospective reports comparing HDR-BT and LDR-BT to each other or to other treatment options (such as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or surgery) suggest similar outcomes. The 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rates for patients with low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease are >85%, 69-97%, and 63-80%, respectively. Brachytherapy with EBRT (versus brachytherapy alone) is an appropriate approach in select patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk disease. The 10-year rates of overall survival, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality are >85%, <10%, and <5%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated with HDR-BT and LDR-BT are rare, at <4% in most series, and quality of life is improved in patients who receive brachytherapy compared with those who undergo surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111-2497, USA
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Charlton Bldg/Desk R - SL, Rochester, Minnesota 5590, USA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St BWH. Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee St, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
| | - Peter J Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK
| | - Yasuo Yoshioka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Gerard C Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Eric M Horwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111-2497, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dosimetric comparison between treatment plans of patients treated with low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate interstitial prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy: Initial findings of a randomized clinical trial. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:608-615. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2016] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
45
|
Abuodeh YA, Naghavi AO, Juan TH, Ma Z, Wilder RB. Quality of Life after post-prostatectomy intensity modulated radiation therapy to the prostate bed with or without the use of gold fiducial markers for image guidance or higher total radiotherapy doses. Int Braz J Urol 2017; 43:628-637. [PMID: 28379660 PMCID: PMC5557437 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2016] [Accepted: 12/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate quality of life (QoL) after post-prostatectomy intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the “adjuvant” setting starting within 4 months of radical prostatectomy for adverse features; and “salvage” setting for a PSA≥0.2ng/mL. Materials and Methods Retrospective review of 130 patients who underwent IMRT to the prostate bed±gold fiducial marker placement for image guidance to 64.8-72.0Gy (median, 70.2Gy) between 2004 and 2013. Higher doses were defined as 70.2-72.0Gy and lower doses were defined as 64.8-68.4Gy. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given to 4/48 (8%) adjuvant patients and 9/82 (11%) salvage patients. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26-bowel (EPIC-26-bowel) questionnaires were used to assess urinary, sexual, and bowel QoL, respectively. Results Median follow-up was 46 months. There were better urinary (p=0.03) and sexual (p=0.002) QoL scores with adjuvant IMRT relative to salvage IMRT. The use of prostate bed fiducial markers did not significantly affect urinary, sexual, or bowel QoL (p=0.39, p=0.49, and p=0.40, respectively). Higher total radiotherapy doses did not significantly affect urinary, sexual, or bowel QoL (p=0.21, p=0.61, and p=0.36, respectively). Conclusions There was no significant change in urinary, sexual, and bowel sexual QoL with post-prostatectomy IMRT regardless of whether prostate bed fiducial markers or higher total radiotherapy doses were used. QoL with IMRT in the present study compares favorably with prior reports for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazan A Abuodeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Tzu-Hua Juan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Zhenjun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Patel S, Demanes DJ, Ragab O, Zhang M, Veruttipong D, Nguyen K, Park SJ, Marks L, Pantuck A, Steinberg M, Kamrava M. High-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy without androgen deprivation therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:299-305. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Revised: 10/22/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
47
|
Sánchez-Gómez LM, Polo-deSantos M, Rodríguez-Melcón JI, Angulo JC, Luengo-Matos S. High-dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in prostate cancer: A systematic review of its safety and efficacy. Actas Urol Esp 2017; 41:71-81. [PMID: 27496770 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is an increasingly popular treatment for patients with localised prostate cancer (PC). OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and efficacy of HDR-BT as monotherapy in PC. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE A systematic literature review was conducted through searches on MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, CDR, ClinicalTrials and EuroScan. We assessed safety and efficacy indicators. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE We selected 2 reviews and 12 uncontrolled studies, included in these 2 reviews. In terms of efficacy, local control in 6 studies was 97-100%. The biochemical progression-free survival varied as follows: 85-100% for low risk and 79-92% for high risk. Survival free of metastases was >95% at 8 years, except in one study where the survival rate was 87% at 5 years. The overall survival was ≥95% in 8 studies. In terms of safety, most of the studies recorded acute and long-term genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications, especially grade ≥2. Only 3 studies found grade 4 complications. All studies, except for one without complications, observed genitourinary complications that were more frequent and severe than the gastrointestinal complications. Two studies assessed the quality of life and showed an initial reduction in various domains and subsequent partial or total recovery, except in the sexual domain. CONCLUSIONS HDR-BT is effective as monotherapy, especially in cases of low to intermediate risk. There is insufficient information on high-risk patients. The short to medium-term toxicity was acceptable. Further research needs to be funded to provide more information on the long-term safety and efficacy of this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Sánchez-Gómez
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Madrid, España; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (IP), Madrid, España; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), España.
| | - M Polo-deSantos
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Madrid, España
| | - J I Rodríguez-Melcón
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España
| | - J C Angulo
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - S Luengo-Matos
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yoshioka Y, Kotsuma T, Komiya A, Kariya S, Konishi K, Nonomura N, Ogawa K, Tanaka E, Nishimura K, Fujiuchi Y, Kitamura H, Yamagami T, Yamasaki I, Nishimura K, Teshima T, Nakamura K, Itami J. Nationwide, Multicenter, Retrospective Study on High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 97:952-961. [PMID: 28333018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Revised: 11/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present, analyze, and discuss results of a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study on high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as monotherapy for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1995 through 2013, 524 patients, 73 (14%) with low-risk, 207 (40%) with intermediate-risk, and 244 (47%) with high-risk prostate cancer, were treated with HDR-BT as monotherapy at 5 institutions in Japan. Dose fractionations were 27 Gy/2 fractions for 69 patients (13%), 45.5 Gy/7 fractions for 168 (32%), 49 Gy/7 fractions for 149 (28%), 54 Gy/9 fractions for 130 (25%), and others for 8 (2%). Of these patients, 156 (30%) did not receive androgen deprivation therapy, and 202 patients (39%) did receive androgen deprivation therapy <1 year, 112 (21%) for 1-3 years, and 54 (10%) for >3 years. Median follow-up time was 5.9 years (range, 0.4-18.1 years), with a minimum of 2 years for surviving patients. RESULTS After 5 years, respective actuarial rates of no biochemical evidence of disease, overall survival, cause-specific survival, and metastasis-free survival for all patients were 92%, 97%, 99%, and 94%. For low/intermediate/high-risk patients, the 5-year no biochemical evidence of disease rates were 95%/94%/89%, the 5-year overall survival rates were 98%/98%/94%, the 5-year cause-specific survival rates were 98%/100%/98%, and the 5-year metastasis-free survival rates were 98%/95%/90%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of late grade 2 to 3 genitourinary toxicity at 5 years was 19%, and that of late grade 3 was 1%. The corresponding incidences of gastrointestinal toxicity were 3% and 0% (0.2%). No grade 4 or 5 of either type of toxicity was detected. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study demonstrate that HDR-BT as monotherapy was safe and effective for all patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Yoshioka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Tadayuki Kotsuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Komiya
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan; Department of Urology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinji Kariya
- Department of Radiology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Eiichi Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Yasuyoshi Fujiuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | | | | | - Kazuo Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Teruki Teshima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Katsumasa Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) as Predicting Marker for Clinical Outcome and Evaluation of Early Toxicity Rate after High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in Combination with Additional External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) for High Risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:ijms17111879. [PMID: 27834929 PMCID: PMC5133879 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17111879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Revised: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a common treatment option for locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Seventy-nine male patients (median age 71 years, range 50 to 79) with high-risk PCa underwent HDR-BT following EBRT between December 2009 and January 2016 with a median follow-up of 21 months. HDR-BT was administered in two treatment sessions (one week interval) with 9 Gy per fraction using a planning system and the Ir192 treatment unit GammaMed Plus iX. EBRT was performed with CT-based 3D-conformal treatment planning with a total dose administration of 50.4 Gy with 1.8 Gy per fraction and five fractions per week. Follow-up for all patients was organized one, three, and five years after radiation therapy to evaluate early and late toxicity side effects, metastases, local recurrence, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value measured in ng/mL. The evaluated data included age, PSA at time of diagnosis, PSA density, BMI (body mass index), Gleason score, D'Amico risk classification for PCa, digital rectal examination (DRE), PSA value after one/three/five year(s) follow-up (FU), time of follow-up, TNM classification, prostate volume, and early toxicity rates. Early toxicity rates were 8.86% for gastrointestinal, and 6.33% for genitourinary side effects. Of all treated patients, 84.81% had no side effects. All reported complications in early toxicity were grade 1. PSA density at time of diagnosis (p = 0.009), PSA on date of first HDR-BT (p = 0.033), and PSA on date of first follow-up after one year (p = 0.025) have statistical significance on a higher risk to get a local recurrence during follow-up. HDR-BT in combination with additional EBRT in the presented design for high-risk PCa results in high biochemical control rates with minimal side-effects. PSA is a negative predictive biomarker for local recurrence during follow-up. A longer follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcome and toxicities.
Collapse
|
50
|
Aluwini S, Busser WMH, Baartman LEA, Bhawanie A, Alemayehu WG, Boormans JL, Kolkman-Deurloo IKK. Fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in prostate cancer: Does implant displacement and its correction influence acute and late toxicity? Brachytherapy 2016; 15:707-713. [PMID: 27364871 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Revised: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer (PCa) with one implant for several fractions, dose delivery relies on reproducibility of catheter positions. However, caudal displacement of implanted catheters does occur between fractions and needs to be corrected. Our protocol prescribes correction of displacements > 3 mm. We investigated whether displacement and its corrections influence acute and late toxicity incidences. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed 162 PCa patients treated with HDR-BT monotherapy between 2007 and 2013. The implant remained in situ between the 4 fractions. Catheter displacement was assessed before each fraction using lateral X-ray images and corrected if needed. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) acute and late toxicities were assessed using clinical record forms and patient self-assessment questionnaires. RESULTS Implant displacement corrections (DC) were needed in 71 patients (43.8%) whereas no DCs were needed in 91 patients (56.2%). No statistically significant differences were seen in acute and late grade ≥ 2 GU and GI toxicity incidences between DC and no DC groups. The maximum displacement nor the number of corrections had any influence on toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The occurrence and subsequent correction of implant displacements exceeding 3 mm during fractionated HDR-BT monotherapy for PCa did not lead to increased incidences of acute or late GU and GI toxicity. This indicates that our clinical protocol to correct displacements > 3 mm results in safe treatment regarding organ at risk toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wendy M H Busser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lizette E A Baartman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anand Bhawanie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|