Validating the RTOG-Endorsed Brachial Plexus Contouring Atlas: An Evaluation of Reproducibility Among Patients Treated by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer

Neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Radiotherapy is one of the mainstay treatment modalities for the management of non-metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). Notable improvements in treatment outcomes have been observed in the recent decades. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and charged particle therapy, have significantly improved tumor target conformity and enabled better preservation of normal structures. However, because of the intricate anatomy of the head and neck region, multiple critical neurological structures such as the brain, brainstem, spinal cord, cranial nerves, nerve plexuses, autonomic pathways, brain vasculature, and neurosensory organs, are variably irradiated during treatment, particularly when tumor targets are in close proximity. Consequently, a diverse spectrum of late neurological sequelae may manifest in HNC survivors. These neurological complications commonly result in irreversible symptoms, impair patients' quality of life, and contribute to a substantial proportion of non-cancer deaths. Although the relationship between radiation dose and toxicity has not been fully elucidated for all complications, appropriate application of dosimetric constraints during radiotherapy planning may reduce their incidence. Vigilant surveillance during the course of survivorship also enables early detection and intervention. This article endeavors to provide a comprehensive review of the various neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for HNC, summarize the current incidence data, discuss methods to minimize their risks during radiotherapy planning, and highlight potential strategies for managing these debilitating toxicities.

Is there any radiation-induced brachial plexopathy after hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy?

Introduction

Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) is one of the most concerning late radiation effects after hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy (HF-PMRT) to the chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the RIBP events occurring in breast cancer patients after HF-PMRT using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by helical tomotherapy. Furthermore, the dosimetric parameters of the ipsilateral brachial plexus were reported.

Materials and methods

Breast cancer patients who underwent HF-PMRT using the IMRT via HT at our institute were included. In the first cohort, subjective RIBP symptoms were measured using a QuickDASH questionnaire, whereas objective RIBP events were assessed using a comprehensive physical evaluation in the second cohort. The ipsilateral brachial plexus from all eligible patients' treatment plans was contoured, and the dosimetric parameters were explored.

Results

From March 2014 to December 2022, 229 patients were enrolled; 107 and 72 individuals were in the first and second cohorts, respectively. The first cohort's median follow-up period was 27 months, and the second cohort was 31 months. In the first cohort, 80 patients (74.77%) had a normal function, 21 (19.63%) had a mild grade, and 6 (5.61%) had a moderate grade; no severe or very severe RIBP was observed. However, the comprehensive physical evaluation of the second cohort indicated no RIBP events. Dosimetric analysis revealed that the median maximum dose was 44.52, 44.52, and 44.60 Gy; the median mean dose was 33.00, 32.23, and 32.33 Gy; and the median dose at 0.03 cc was 44.33, 44.36, and 44.39 Gy for all patients, patients in the first and second cohort, respectively. Each dosimetric parameter was evaluated, and no statistically significant differences were detected.

Conclusion

The absence of RIBP events supports the safety of employing HF-PMRT by HT for the chest wall and all regional lymph nodes. We propose that applying the ICRU Report 83 criteria for IMRT planning, which limit the maximum dose (107% of the prescribed dose) to less than 2% of the planning target volume and exclude the brachial plexus region from the maximal dose area, is a practical way to minimize the risk of RIBP from HF-PMRT.

Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases

Radiotherapy is the dominant treatment modality for painful spine and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). Historically, this was achieved with conventional low dose external beam radiotherapy, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for these indications. Meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improved pain response and more durable tumor control with SBRT for spine metastases. However, in the setting of NSBM, there is limited evidence supporting global adoption and large scale randomized clinical trials are in need. SBRT is technically demanding requiring careful consideration of organ at risk tolerance, and strict adherence to technical requirements including immobilization, simulation, contouring and image-guidance procedures. Additional considerations include follow up practices after SBRT, with appropriate imaging playing a critical role in response assessment. Finally, there is renewed research into promising new technologies that may further refine the use of SBRT in both spinal and NSBM in the years to come.

Vertebral artery sparing volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Vascular stenosis is a late radiation complication that develops in long-term survivors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Vertebral arteries (VAs) are major vessels responsible for posterior circulation. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of VA-sparing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques. A total of 20 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by a TrueBeam linear accelerator were enrolled in this study. The original VMAT plan was designed without the contouring of VAs as organs at risk (OARs). The same image set of the original VMAT plan was used to contour the VAs for each patient. A new VA-sparing VMAT plan was developed by avoiding VAs as OARs. Finally, a paired t-test was used to compare the dosimetric differences. The VA-sparing VMAT plan had similar target coverage and dose to those of other OARs. The VA-sparing plan yielded a significantly low VA dose from 53 to 40 Gy, with V35Gy changing from 97% to 56%, V50Gy changing from 67% to 35%, and V63Gy changing from 15% to approximately 7%-10% (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). VAs should be correctly identified as OARs. Photon VMAT with VA sparing can help substantially decrease the VA dose.

Contouring lumbosacral plexus nerves with MR neurography and MR/CT deformable registration technique

Purpose

It is difficult to contour nerve structures with the naked eye due to poor differentiation between the nerve structures with other soft tissues on CT images. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) has the advantage in nerve visualization. The purpose of this study is to identify one MRN sequence to better assist the delineation of the lumbosacral plexus (LSP) nerves to assess the radiation dose to the LSP using the magnetic resonance (MR)/CT deformable coregistration technique.

Methods

A total of 18 cases of patients with prostate cancer and one volunteer with radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy (RILSP) were enrolled. The data of simulation CT images and original treatment plans were collected. Two MRN sequences (Lr_NerveVIEW sequence and Cs_NerveVIEW sequence) were optimized from a published MRN sequence (3D NerveVIEW sequence). The nerve visualization ability of the Lr_NerveVIEW sequence and the Cs_NerveVIEW sequence was evaluated via a four-point nerve visualization score (NVS) scale in the first 10 patients enrolled to determine the better MRN sequence for assisting nerve contouring. Deformable registration was applied to the selected MRN sequence and simulation CT images to get fused MR/CT images, on which the LSP was delineated. The contouring of the LSP did not alter treatment planning. The dosimetric data of the LSP nerve were collected from the dose–volume histogram in the original treatment plans. The data of the maximal dose (Dmax) and the location of the maximal radiation point received by the LSP structures were collected.

Results

The Cs_NerveVIEW sequence gained lower NVS scores than the Lr_NerveVIEW sequence (Z=-2.887, p=0.004). The LSP structures were successfully created in 18 patients and one volunteer with MRN (Lr_NerveVIEW)/CT deformable registration techniques, and the LSP structures conformed with the anatomic distribution. In the patient cohort, the percentage of the LSP receiving doses exceeding 50, 55, and 60 Gy was 68% (12/18), 33% (6/18), and 17% (3/18), respectively. For the volunteer with RILSP, the maximum irradiation dose to his LSP nerves was 69 Gy.

Conclusion

The Lr_NerveVIEW MRN sequence performed better than the Cs_NerveVIEW sequence in nerve visualization. The dose in the LSP needs to be measured to understand the potential impact on treatment-induced neuropathy.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Delineation of Organs at Risk in the Head and Neck Region

Purpose

The aim of this article is to establish a comprehensive contouring guideline for treatment planning using only magnetic resonance images through an up-to-date set of organs at risk (OARs), recommended organ boundaries, and relevant suggestions for the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based delineation of OARs in the head and neck (H&N) region.

Methods and Materials

After a detailed review of the literature, MRI data were collected from the H&N region of healthy volunteers. OARs were delineated in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes on T2-weighted sequences. Every contour defined was revised by 4 radiation oncologists and subsequently by 2 independent senior experts (H&N radiation oncologist and radiologist). After revision, the final structures were presented to the consortium partners.

Results

A definitive consensus was reached after multi-institutional review. On that basis, we provided a detailed anatomic and functional description and specific MRI characteristics of the OARs.

Conclusions

In the era of precision radiation therapy, the need for well-built, straightforward contouring guidelines is on the rise. Precise, uniform, delineation-based, automated OAR segmentation on MRI may lead to increased accuracy in terms of organ boundaries and analysis of dose-dependent sequelae for an adequate definition of normal tissue complication probability.

Radiation-induced neuropathies in head and neck cancer: prevention and treatment modalities

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common human malignancy with a global incidence of 650,000 cases per year. Radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used as an effective therapy to treat tumours as a definitive or adjuvant treatment. Despite the substantial advances in RT contouring and dosage delivery, patients suffer from various radiation-induced complications, among which are toxicities to the nervous tissues in the head and neck area. Radiation-mediated neuropathies manifest as a result of increased oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis, neuroinflammation and altered cellular function in the nervous tissues. Eventually, molecular damage results in the formation of fibrotic tissues leading to susceptible loss of function of numerous neuronal substructures. Neuropathic sequelae following irradiation in the head and neck area include sensorineural hearing loss, alterations in taste and smell functions along with brachial plexopathy, and cranial nerves palsies. Numerous management options are available to relieve radiation-associated neurotoxicities notwithstanding treatment alternatives that remain restricted with limited benefits. In the scope of this review, we discuss the use of variable management and therapeutic modalities to palliate common radiation-induced neuropathies in head and neck cancers.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy comparing a standard radiotherapy schedule (over 3 weeks) with a novel 1-week schedule in adjuvant breast cancer: an open-label randomized controlled study (HYPORT-Adjuvant)-study protocol for a multicentre, randomized phase III trial

Background

Hypofractionated radiotherapy is the current standard for adjuvant radiotherapy across many centres. Further hypofractionation may be possible but remains to be investigated in non-Caucasian populations with more advanced disease, with a higher proportion of patients requiring mastectomy as well as tumour bed boost. We are reporting the design of randomized controlled trial testing the hypothesis that a 1-week (5 fractions) regimen of radiotherapy will be non-inferior to a standard 3-week (15 fractions) schedule.

Methods

We describe a multicentre, randomized controlled trial recruiting patients at large academic centres across India. Patients without distant metastases who merit adjuvant radiotherapy will be eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients in the control arm will receive adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall (with/without regional nodes) to a dose of 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks, while those in the experimental arm will receive a dose of 26 Gy/5 fractions/1 week (to the same volume). The use of a simultaneous integrated boost (dose of 8 Gy and 6 Gy, respectively) is allowed in patients who have undergone breast conservation. A sample size of 2100 patients provides an 80% power to detect a non-inferiority of 3% in the 5-year locoregional recurrence rate with a one-sided type I error of 2.5%, assuming that the locoregional recurrence rate in the control arm is 5% at 5 years (corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.63). Patients will be recruited over a period of 5 years and followed up for a further 5 years thereafter.

Discussion

If a five-fraction regimen of breast cancer is proven to be non-inferior, this will result in a significant improvement in the access to radiotherapy, as well as reduced costs of treatment. The trial gives an opportunity to standardize and quality-assure radiotherapy practices across the nation at the same time. Along with the results of the FAST-Forward trial, the safety of this intervention in advanced node-positive disease requiring regional nodal radiation will be established.

Trial registration

The trial has been registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) vide registration number: CTRI/2018/12/016816 (December 31, 2018) as well as the ClinicalTrial.gov website at NCT03788213 (December 28, 2018).

A dosimetric evaluation on applying RTOG-based and CT/MRI-based delineation methods to brachial plexus in radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with helical tomotherapy

OBJECTIVE

In radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, the brachial plexus (BP) situated at both sides of the neck is often irradiated to high dose. This study was to evaluate different BP delineation methods and analyse the dosimetric consequences when applying BP dose constraints in radiotherapy planning of NPC.

METHODS

15 NPC cases radically treated with helical tomotherapy were recruited. Apart from the original treatment plan (Plan A), two new plans (Plans B and C) with additional BP dose constraints were computed using the same planning CT images, structures and planning parameters. Plan B consisted of BP contours based on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-endorsed atlas; while those in Plan C were based on MR images registered with the planning CT images.

RESULTS

The mean BP volume by RTOG method was 19.04 ± 3.50 cm³ vs 10.44 ± 2.00 cm³ by CT/MRI method. The mean BP overlapping volume between the two contouring methods was 1.9 cm³ (0.38-4.03 cm³). There was significant difference between two methods (p < 0.001). The average D_max, D_mean, D_5%, D_10% and D_15% of both sides of BP in Plan A were significantly higher than those in both Plan B and Plan C. There were no significant dose differences in the targets and organs at risk (OARs) after applying dose constraints in Plan B and Plan C.

CONCLUSION

RTOG method was recommended since larger BP volume provided better protection. Applying BP dose constraints during tomotherapy plan optimisation for NPC patients could significantly reduce the BP dose (p < 0.05) without compromising the doses to the targets and other OARs.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first study comparing the delineation method based on RTOG-endorsed atlas with the conventional CT/MRI delineation method for BP in tomotherapy of NPC patients. Our results showed that BP dose could be significantly reduced after applying the dose constraints without compromising the doses to the target volumes and other OARs. The RTOG method was more favoured as it gave a relatively larger BP volume and therefore offered better organ sparing.

Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Volume delineation is a well-recognised potential source of error in radiotherapy. Whilst it is important to quantify the degree of interobserver variability (IOV) in volume delineation, the resulting impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes is a more relevant endpoint. We performed a literature review of studies evaluating IOV in target volume and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation in order to analyse these with respect to the metrics used, reporting of dosimetric consequences, and use of statistical tests.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Medline and Pubmed databases were queried for relevant articles using keywords. We included studies published in English between 2000 and 2014 with more than two observers.

RESULTS

119 studies were identified covering all major tumour sites. CTV (n=47) and GTV (n=38) were most commonly contoured. Median number of participants and data sets were 7 (3-50) and 9 (1-132) respectively. There was considerable heterogeneity in the use of metrics and methods of analysis. Statistical analysis of results was reported in 68% (n=81) and dosimetric consequences in 21% (n=25) of studies.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of consistency in conducting and reporting analyses from IOV studies. We suggest a framework to use for future studies evaluating IOV.

Increasing consistency and accuracy in radiation therapy via educational interventions is not just limited to radiation oncologists

This editorial is advocating that increasing consistency and accuracy in radiation therapy via educational interventions is important for radiation therapist. Education and training with ongoing refreshers is the key to maintaining consistency throughout the radiotherapy process, which in turn will ensure all patients receive accurate treatment.

Maintaining prostate contouring consistency following an educational intervention

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess variation in prostate contouring 12 months following a structured interactive educational intervention (EI) and to test the hypothesis that EIs positively impact on prostate contouring accuracy and consistency long term.

Methods

A common set of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data sets were used to assess prostate contouring consistency before, immediately after and 12 months following an EI. No further EIs were provided after the initial EI. Contour variation was assessed using the volume ratio (VR), defined as the ratio of the encompassing volume to common volume.

Results

Of the original five radiation oncologists (ROs) at baseline, four completed all assessments, and one was unavailable at 12 months follow‐up. At 12 months, mean VR deteriorated by 3.2% on CT and 1.9% on MRI compared to immediately post EI. Overall, compared to the pre‐EI baseline VR, an improvement of 11.4% and 10.8% was demonstrated on CT and MRI, respectively.

Conclusion

Good retention of applied knowledge 12 months following an EI on prostate contouring was demonstrated. This study advocates for EIs to be included as part of continuing medical education to reduce contour variation among ROs and improve knowledge retention long term.

Early transient radiation-induced brachial plexopathy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

AIM OF THE STUDY

Early transient brachial plexopathy following radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer may be underreported and associated with a dose-response. Our purpose was to determine the incidence of early transient radiation-ınduced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) in patients receiving primary RT (± chemotherapy) for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-seven locally advanced HNC patients who have no finding of brachial plexopathy at the diagnosis were evaluated 3 times by a specifically developed 13-item questionnaire for determining early transient RIBP. The 54 brachial plexus in 27 patients were delineated and dose volume histograms were calculated.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 28 (range: 15-40) months. The mean BP volume was 7.9 ±3.6 cm(3), and the mean and maximum doses to the BP were 45.3 (range: 32.3-59.3) Gy, and 59.4 (range: 41.4-70.3) Gy, respectively. Maximum dose to the BP was ≥ 70 Gy only in 2 nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Two (7%) early transient RIBP were reported at 7(th) and 8(th) month after RT under maximum 67.17 and 55.37 Gy, and mean 52.95 and 38.60 Gy RT doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Two (7%) early RIBP were seen in the patient group, although brachial plexus maximum doses were ≥ 66 Gy in 75% of patients.

Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

Purpose

We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT).

Methods and materials

This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients’ charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing.

Results

The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to ≤5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months).

Conclusions

In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to ≤5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.

An anatomically validated brachial plexus contouring method for intensity modulated radiation therapy planning

PURPOSE

To develop contouring guidelines for the brachial plexus (BP) using anatomically validated cadaver datasets. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) were used to obtain detailed visualizations of the BP region, with the goal of achieving maximal inclusion of the actual BP in a small contoured volume while also accommodating for anatomic variations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

CT and MRI were obtained for 8 cadavers positioned for intensity modulated radiation therapy. 3-dimensional reconstructions of soft tissue (from MRI) and bone (from CT) were combined to create 8 separate enhanced CT project files. Dissection of the corresponding cadavers anatomically validated the reconstructions created. Seven enhanced CT project files were then automatically fitted, separately in different regions, to obtain a single dataset of superimposed BP regions that incorporated anatomic variations. From this dataset, improved BP contouring guidelines were developed. These guidelines were then applied to the 7 original CT project files and also to 1 additional file, left out from the superimposing procedure. The percentage of BP inclusion was compared with the published guidelines.

RESULTS

The anatomic validation procedure showed a high level of conformity for the BP regions examined between the 3-dimensional reconstructions generated and the dissected counterparts. Accurate and detailed BP contouring guidelines were developed, which provided corresponding guidance for each level in a clinical dataset. An average margin of 4.7 mm around the anatomically validated BP contour is sufficient to accommodate for anatomic variations. Using the new guidelines, 100% inclusion of the BP was achieved, compared with a mean inclusion of 37.75% when published guidelines were applied.

CONCLUSION

Improved guidelines for BP delineation were developed using combined MRI and CT imaging with validation by anatomic dissection.

Automatic contouring of brachial plexus using a multi-atlas approach for lung cancer radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To demonstrate a multi-atlas segmentation approach to facilitating accurate and consistent delineation of low-contrast brachial plexuses on computed tomographic images for lung cancer radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified 90 lung cancer patients with treatment volumes near the brachial plexus. Ten representative patients were selected to form an atlas group, and their brachial plexuses were delineated manually. We used deformable image registration to map each atlas brachial plexus to the remaining 80 patients. In each patient, a composite contour was created from 10 individual segmentations using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation algorithm. This auto-delineated contour was reviewed and modified appropriately for each patient. We also performed 10 leave-one-out tests using the 10 atlases to validate the segmentation accuracy and demonstrate the contouring consistency using multi-atlas segmentation.

RESULTS

The multi-atlas segmentation took less than 2 minutes to complete. Contour modification took 5 minutes compared with 20 minutes for manual contouring from scratch. The multi-atlas segmentation from the 10 leave-one-out tests had a mean 3-dimensional (3D) volume overlap of 59.2% ± 8.2% and a mean 3D surface distance of 2.4 mm ± 0.5 mm. The distances between the individual and average contours in the 10 leave-one-out tests demonstrated much better contouring consistency for modified contours than for manual contours. The auto-segmented contours did not require substantial modification, demonstrated by the good agreement between the modified and auto-segmented contours in the 80 patients. Dose volume histograms of auto-segmented and modified contours were also in good agreement, showing that editing auto-segmented contours is clinically acceptable in view of the dosimetric impact.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-atlas segmentation greatly reduced contouring time and improved contouring consistency. Editing auto-segmented contours to delineate the brachial plexus proved to be a better clinical practice than manually contouring from scratch.

Developments in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer

SUMMARY Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy, has emerged as an effective treatment for inoperable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. SABR differs from conventional radiotherapy by virtue of its tight spatial tolerances and use of oligofractionated radiation. The modern technique is characterized by management of tumor motion, image guidance before each fraction and specialized radiation delivery techniques. The result is a highly conformal target dose with a sharp gradient that spares normal tissues with great accuracy. This enables delivery of very potent (ablative) doses, causing more rapid and durable responses than traditional radiation therapy treatment regimens can achieve. The established techniques, new developments and ongoing questions related to SABR for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer are reviewed herein.

Radiation dose to the brachial plexus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: An increased risk of an excessive dose to the brachial plexus adjacent to gross nodal disease

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the dose to the brachial plexus in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Twenty-eight patients were selected and the brachial plexus was delineated retrospectively. Brachial plexus adjacent/not adjacent to nodes were defined and abbreviated as BPAN and BPNAN, respectively. Dose distribution was recalculated and a dose-volume histogram was generated based on the original treatment plan. The maximum dose to the left brachial plexus was 59.12-78.47 Gy, and the percentage of patients receiving the maximum dose exceeding 60, 66 and 70 Gy was 96.4, 57.1 and 25.0%, respectively; the maximum dose to the right brachial plexus was 59.74-80.31 Gy, and the percentage of patients exposed to a maximum dose exceeding 60, 66 and 70 Gy was 96.4, 64.3 and 39.3%, respectively. For the left brachial plexus, the maximum doses to the BPANs and the BPNANs were 72.84±3.91 and 64.81±3.47 Gy, respectively (p<0.001). For the right brachial plexus, the maximum doses to the BPANs and the BPNANs were 72.91±4.74 and 64.91±3.52 Gy, respectively (p<0.001). The difference between the left BPANs and the left BPNANs was statistically significant not only for V60 (3.60 vs. 1.01 cm(3), p=0.028) but also for V66 (1.26 vs. 0.11 cm(3), p=0.046). There were significant differences in V60 (3.68 vs. 1.16 cm(3), p<0.001) and V66 (1.83 vs. 1.23 cm(3), p=0.012) between the right BPANs and the right BPNANs. In conclusion, a large proportion of patients were exposed to the maximum dose to the brachial plexus exceeding the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-recommended restraints when the brachial plexus was not outlined. The BPANs are at a significantly higher risk of receiving an excessive radiation dose when compared to the BPNANs. A further study is underway to test whether brachial plexus contouring assists in the dose reduction to the brachial plexus for IMRT optimization.

3D Variation in delineation of head and neck organs at risk

Background

Consistent delineation of patient anatomy becomes increasingly important with the growing use of highly conformal and adaptive radiotherapy techniques. This study investigates the magnitude and 3D localization of interobserver variability of organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck area with application of delineation guidelines, to establish measures to reduce current redundant variability in delineation practice.

Methods

Interobserver variability among five experienced radiation oncologists was studied in a set of 12 head and neck patient CT scans for the spinal cord, parotid and submandibular glands, thyroid cartilage, and glottic larynx. For all OARs, three endpoints were calculated: the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Concordance Index (CI) and a 3D measure of variation (3D SD).

Results

All endpoints showed largest interobserver variability for the glottic larynx (ICC = 0.27, mean CI = 0.37 and 3D SD = 3.9 mm). Better agreement in delineations was observed for the other OARs (range, ICC = 0.32-0.83, mean CI = 0.64-0.71 and 3D SD = 0.9-2.6 mm). Cranial, caudal, and medial regions of the OARs showed largest variations. All endpoints provided support for improvement of delineation practice.

Conclusions

Variation in delineation is traced to several regional causes. Measures to reduce this variation can be: (1) guideline development, (2) joint delineation review sessions and (3) application of multimodality imaging. Improvement of delineation practice is needed to standardize patient treatments.

Radiation dose to the brachial plexus in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its relationship to tumor and nodal stage

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine tumor factors contributing to brachial plexus (BP) dose in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) when the BP is routinely contoured as an organ at risk (OAR) for IMRT optimization.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2004 to 2011, a total of 114 HNC patients underwent IMRT to a total dose of 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions, with the right and left BP prospectively contoured as separate OARs in 111 patients and the ipsilateral BP contoured in 3 patients (total, 225 BP). Staging category T4 and N2/3 disease were present in 34 (29.8%) and 74 (64.9%) patients, respectively. During IMRT optimization, the intent was to keep the maximum BP dose to ≤60 Gy, but prioritizing tumor coverage over achieving the BP constraints. BP dose parameters were compared with tumor and nodal stage.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 16.2 months, 43 (37.7%) patients had ≥24 months of follow-up with no brachial plexopathy reported. Mean BP volume was 8.2 ± 4.5 cm(3). Mean BP maximum dose was 58.1 ± 12.2 Gy, and BP mean dose was 42.2 ± 11.3 Gy. The BP maximum dose was ≤60, ≤66, and ≤70 Gy in 122 (54.2%), 185 (82.2%), and 203 (90.2%) BP, respectively. For oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx sites, the mean BP maximum dose was 58.4 Gy and 63.4 Gy in T0-3 and T4 disease, respectively (p = 0.002). Mean BP maximum dose with N0/1 and N2/3 disease was 52.8 Gy and 60.9 Gy, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In head-and-neck IMRT, dose constraints for the BP are difficult to achieve to ≤60 to 66 Gy with T4 disease of the larynx, hypopharynx, and oropharynx or N2/3 disease. The risk of brachial plexopathy is likely very small in HNC patients undergoing IMRT, although longer follow-up is required.