Association Between Maximal Skin Dose and Breast Brachytherapy Outcome: A Proposal for More Rigorous Dosimetric Constraints

Breast brachytherapy: Building a bright future on the foundation of a rich history of advancement in technology, technique, and patient-centered care

For over 20 years, the concept of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has received considerable attention. Initially concentrating on the appropriateness of APBI as an alternative treatment to whole breast radiotherapy, investigation and innovation evolved towards dose delivery and technique appropriateness. The purpose of this article is to review the pertinent literature that supports the role brachytherapy serves in delivering APBI and the recognized brachytherapy techniques for dose delivery. Publications establishing techniques utilizing multicatheter brachytherapy, single-entry brachytherapy applicators, permanent breast seed implantation brachytherapy, noninvasive breast brachytherapy and electronic brachytherapy are described. The use of brachytherapy for repeat breast conservation therapy is additionally reviewed. A historical perspective and potential direction of future investigation and innovation are presented.

Partial breast irradiation: An updated consensus statement from the American brachytherapy society

PURPOSE

In recent years, results with mature follow-up have been reported for several Phase III trials randomizing women to receive whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus varying modalities of partial breast irradiation (PBI). It is important to recognize that these methods vary in terms of volume of breast tissue treated, dose per fraction, and duration of therapy. As such, clinical and technical guidelines may vary among the various PBI techniques.

METHODS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in PBI performed an extensive literature review focusing on the highest quality data available for the numerous PBI options offered in the modern era. Data were evaluated for strength of evidence and published outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

The majority of women enrolled on randomized trials of WBI versus PBI have been age >45 years with tumor size <3 cm, negative margins, and negative lymph nodes. The panel also concluded that PBI can be offered to selected women with estrogen receptor negative and/or Her2 amplified breast cancer, as well as ductal carcinoma in situ, and should generally be avoided in women with extensive lymphovascular space invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated guideline summarizes published clinical trials of PBI methods. The panel also highlights the role of PBI for women facing special circumstances, such as history of cosmetic breast augmentation or prior breast irradiation, and discusses promising novel modalities that are currently under study, such as ultrashort and preoperative PBI. Updated consensus guidelines are also provided to inform patient selection for PBI and to characterize the strength of evidence to support varying PBI modalities.

H&N and Skin (HNS) GEC-ESTRO Working Group critical review of recommendations regarding prescription depth, bolus thickness and maximum dose in skin superficial brachytherapy with flaps and customized moulds

The aim of this publication is the assessment of the existing guidelines for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) superficial brachytherapy (BT) and make a critical review based on the existing literature about the maximum dose prescription depth, bolus thickness and maximum skin surface dose (D_max) of the published clinical practice. A systematic review of NMSC superficial BT published articles was carried out by the GEC-ESTRO Head & Neck and Skin (HNS) Working Group (WG). 10 members and 2 external reviewers compared the published clinical procedures with the recommendations in the current guidelines and examined the grade of evidence. Our review verified that there is a large variation among centres with regards to clinical practice in superficial BT and identified studies where published parameters such as maximum dose prescription depth, bolus thickness and D_max exceed the constraints recommended in the guidelines, while showing excellent results in terms of local control, toxicity and cosmesis. This review confirmed that current recommendations on skin superficial BT do not include published experience on tumours treated with superficial BT that require dose prescription depth beyond the recommended 5mm under the skin surface and that the existing literature does not provide sufficient evidence to relate dosimetry of superficial BT to patient reported outcome measures. The GEC-ESTRO HNS WG considers acceptable to prescribe superficial BT dose at a depth above 5mm beyond the skin surface, and modify the bolus thickness to optimize the treatment plan and adjust the acceptable maximum dose on the skin surface, all pending clinical situation.

Breast brachytherapy

Accelerated partial breast irradiation with brachytherapy is a treatment method with a very low risk profile. In fact, accelerated partial breast irradiation brachytherapy has been proven in randomized trials to have fewer late side effects than whole-breast irradiation. Notably, Grade 3 late side effects are extremely rare, and excellent to good cosmetic results are observed in well over 90% of patients. In this article, published side effects of breast brachytherapy are reviewed and appropriate management discussed.

A reliable skin toxicity predictor in permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To establish skin dose-outcome relationships using a reliable metric in permanent breast seed implant (PBSI).

METHODS

Sixty-seven consecutive patients who underwent PBSI at our institution were included. Skin doses were calculated using two skin dose indices: maximum point dose to the skin surface, D_max, and D_0.2cc for a 2-mm internal skin rind (a surrogate to the dose to 1 cm² area of skin) from CT-based postoperative treatment plans. Toxicity data were extracted from patients' charts and photographs. The associations between skin dose and skin toxicity were investigated using the analysis of variance, and the predictive performance of skin dose measures was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

For acute reactions, 49.3% of patients had Grade 1, 4.5% Grade 2, and 1.5% Grade 3 toxicity. For telangiectasia at 3 years, very minor and minimally apparent telangiectasia was observed in 25% of patients. Moderate but asymptomatic telangiectasia was observed in 9.1% of cases. Both metrics were significantly associated with the occurrence of acute toxicity and telangiectasia at 3 years (p < 0.01). The predictive values for D_max and D_0.2cc were 0.779 and 0.763, respectively, (p < 0.0001) for acute skin toxicity and 0.786 and 0.810 for telangiectasia (p < 0.0002). Extreme dose outliers (up to 878 Gy) and a high variability were observed for D_max but not for D_0.2cc, illustrating the superior reliability of D_0.2cc.

CONCLUSION

D_0.2cc, as an alternate skin dose measure to D_max, is a robust metric for measuring skin dose that is simple to calculate, yet is clinically relevant and not prone to inaccuracies inherent to point dose measurement.

In vivo dosimetry using MOSkin detector during Cobalt-60 high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of skin cancer

The MOSkin, a metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor based detector, is suitable for evaluating skin dose due to its water equivalent depth (WED) of 0.07 mm. This study evaluates doses received by target area and unavoidable normal skin during a the case of skin brachytherapy. The MOSkin was evaluated for its feasibility as detector of choice for in vivo dosimetry during skin brachytherapy. A high-dose rate Cobalt-60 brachytherapy source was administered to the tumour located at the medial aspect of the right arm, complicated with huge lymphedema thus limiting the arm motion. The source was positioned in the middle of patients' right arm with supine, hands down position. A 5 mm lead and 5 mm bolus were sandwiched between the medial aspect of the arm and lateral chest to reduce skin dose to the chest. Two calibrated MOSkin detectors were placed on the target and normal skin area for five treatment sessions for in vivo dose monitoring. The mean dose to the target area ranged between 19.9 and 21.1 Gy and was higher in comparison with the calculated dose due to contribution of backscattered dose from lead. The mean measured dose at normal skin chest area was 1.6 Gy (1.3-1.9 Gy), less than 2 Gy per fraction. Total dose in EQD₂ received by chest skin was much lower than the recommended skin tolerance. The MOSkin detector presents a reliable real-time dose measurement. This study has confirmed the applicability of the MOSkin detector in monitoring skin dose during brachytherapy treatment due to its small sensitive volume and WED 0.07 mm.

A randomized controlled trial testing a hyaluronic acid spacer injection for skin toxicity reduction of brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): a study protocol

BACKGROUND

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is a treatment option for selected early stage breast cancer patients. Some APBI techniques lead to skin toxicity with the skin dose as main risk factor. We hypothesize that a spacer injected between the skin and target volume reduces the skin dose and subsequent toxicity in permanent breast seed implant (PBSI) patients.

METHODS

In this parallel-group, single-center, randomized controlled trial, the effect of a subcutaneous spacer injection on skin toxicity among patients treated with PBSI is tested. Eligibility for participation is derived from international guidelines for suitable patients for partial breast radiotherapy, e.g. women aged ≥ 50 years with a histologically proven non-lobular breast carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), tumor size ≤ 3 cm, node-negative, and PBSI technically feasible. Among exclusion criteria are neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lymphovascular invasion, and allergy for hyaluronic acid. For the patients allocated to receive spacer, after the PBSI procedure, 4-10 cc of biodegradable hyaluronic acid (Barrigel™, Palette Life Sciences, Santa Barbara, CA, USA or Restylane SubQ®, Galderma Benelux, Breda, the Netherlands) is injected directly under the skin using ultrasound guidance to create an extra 0.5-1 cm space between the treatment volume and the skin. The primary outcome is the rate of telangiectasia at two years, blindly assessed using Bentzen's 4-point scale. Secondary outcomes include: local recurrence; disease-free and overall survival rates; adverse events (pain, redness, skin/subcutaneous induration, radiation dermatitis, pigmentation, surgical site infection); skin dose; cosmetic and functional results; and health-related quality of life. A Fisher's exact test will be used to test differences between groups on the primary outcome. Previous studies found 22.4% telangiectasia at two years. We expect the use of a spacer could reduce the occurrence of telangiectasia to 7.7%. A sample size of 230 patients will allow for a 10% lost to follow-up rate.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the effect of a subcutaneous spacer injection on the skin dose, late skin toxicity, and cosmetic outcome is tested in patients treated with PBSI in the setting of breast-conserving therapy. Our results will be relevant for most forms of breast brachytherapy as well as robotic radiosurgery, as skin spacers could protect the skin with these other techniques.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register, NTR6549 . Registered on 27 June 2017.

Chronic radiation-induced dermatitis: challenges and solutions

Chronic radiation dermatitis is a late side effect of skin irradiation, which may deteriorate patients’ quality of life. There is a lack of precise data about its incidence; however, several risk factors may predispose to the development of this condition. It includes radiotherapy dose, fractionation, technique, concurrent systemic therapy, comorbidities, and personal and genetic factors. Chronic radiation dermatitis is mostly caused by the imbalance of proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines. Clinical manifestation includes changes in skin appearance, wounds, ulcerations, necrosis, fibrosis, and secondary cancers. The most severe complication of irradiation is extensive radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF). RIF can manifest in many ways, such as skin induration and retraction, lymphedema or restriction of joint motion. Diagnosis of chronic radiation dermatitis is usually made by clinical examination. In case of unclear clinical manifestation, a biopsy and histopathological examination are recommended to exclude secondary malignancy. The most effective prophylaxis of chronic radiation dermatitis is the use of proper radiation therapy techniques to avoid unnecessary irradiation of healthy skin. Treatment of chronic radiation dermatitis is demanding. The majority of the interventions are based only on clinical practice. Telangiectasia may be treated with pulse dye laser therapy. Chronic postirradiation wounds need special dressings. In case of necrosis or severe ulceration, surgical intervention may be considered. Management of RIF should be complex. Available methods are rehabilitative care, pharmacotherapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and laser therapy. Future challenges include the assessment of late skin toxicity in modern irradiation techniques. Special attention should be paid on genomics and radiomics that allow scientists and clinicians to select patients who are at risk of the development of chronic radiation dermatitis. Novel treatment methods and clinical trials are strongly needed to provide more efficacious therapies.

Comparative dosimetric findings using accelerated partial breast irradiation across five catheter subtypes

Purpose

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with balloon and strut adjusted volume implants (SAVI) show promising results with excellent tumor control and minimal toxicity. Knowing the factors that contribute to a high skin dose, rib dose, and D₉₅ coverage may reduce toxicity, improve tumor control, and help properly predict patient outcomes following APBI.

Methods and materials

A retrospective analysis of 594 patients treated with brachytherapy based APBI at a single institution from May 2008 to September 2014 was grouped by applicator subtype. Patients were treated to a total of 34 Gy (3.4 Gy x 10 fractions over 5 days delivered BID) targeting a planning target volume (PTV) 1.0 cm beyond the lumpectomy cavity using a high dose rate source.

Results

SAVI devices had the lowest statistically significant values of D_maxSkin (81.00 ± 29.83), highest values of D₉₀ (101.50 ± 3.66), and D₉₅ (96.09 ± 4.55). SAVI-mini devices had the lowest statistically significant values of D_maxRib (77.66 ± 32.92) and smallest V₁₅₀ (18.01 ± 3.39). Multi-lumen balloons were able to obtain the smallest V₂₀₀ (5.89 ± 2.21). Strut-based applicators were more likely to achieve a D_maxSkin and a D_maxRib less than or equal to 100 %. The effect of PTV on V₁₅₀ showed a strong positive relationship (p < .001). PTV and D_maxSkin showed a weak negative relationship in multi-lumen applicators (p = .016) and SAVI-mini devices (p < .001). PTV and D_maxRib showed a weak negative relationship in multi-lumen applicators (p = .009), SAVI devices (p < .001), and SAVI-mini devices (p < .001).

Conclusion

PTV volume is strongly correlated with V₁₅₀ in all devices and V₂₀₀ in strut based devices. Larger PTV volumes result in greater V₁₅₀ and V₂₀₀, which could help predict potential risks for hotspots and resulting toxicities in these devices. PTV volume is also weakly negatively correlated with max skin dose and max rib dose, meaning that as the PTV volumes increase one can expect slightly smaller max skin and rib doses. Strut based applicators are significantly more effective in keeping skin and rib dose constraints under 125 and 100 % when compared to any balloon based applicator.

A PHASE II TRIAL OF BALLOON-CATHETER PARTIAL BREAST BRACHYTHERAPY OPTIMIZATION IN THE TREATMENT OF STAGE 0, I AND IIA BREAST CARCINOMA

OBJECTIVES

(a) To prospectively determine if multidwell position dose delivery can decrease skin dose and resultant toxicity over single dwell balloon-catheter partial breast irradiation, and (b) to evaluate whether specific skin parameters could be safely used instead of skin-balloon distance alone for predicting toxicity and treatment eligibility.

METHODS

A single-arm phase II study using a Simon two-stage design was performed on 28 women with stage 0-II breast cancer. All patients were treated with multiple dwell position balloon-catheter brachytherapy. The primary endpoint was ≥ grade 2 skin toxicity. Initial entry required a balloon-skin distance ≥ 7 mm. Based on the toxicity in the first 16 patients, additional patients were treated irrespective of skin-balloon distance as long as the Dmax to 1 mm skin thickness was < 130%.

RESULTS

Compared to the phantom single dwell plans, multidwell planning yielded superior PTV coverage as per median V90, V95 and V100, but had slightly worse V150, V200 and DHI. Dmax to skin was decreased by multidwell planning at multiple skin thicknesses. The most common acute toxicity was grade 1 erythema (57%), and only two patients (7%) developed acute grade 2 toxicity (erythema). Late grade 1 fibrosis was seen in 32%. No patients experienced grade 3, 4, or 5 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidwell position planning for balloon-catheter brachytherapy results in lower skin doses with equal to superior PTV coverage and an overall low rate of initial skin toxicity. Our data suggest that limiting the Dmax to < 130% to 1 mm thick skin is achievable and results in minimal toxicity.