1
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT In recent years, the number of patients with malignant melanoma has continued to increase globally; surgery remains the first treatment option for patients with resectable melanoma. Adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III and IV melanoma following surgical resection has gradually been approved. After complete resection, these patients can probably derive significant benefit from adjuvant therapy. New treatments that improve the long-term survival of patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic melanoma are currently under evaluation in adjuvant therapy to increase relapse-free survival and overall survival. We here review several relevant clinical trials of radiotherapy, systemic immune therapies, molecular-targeted therapies, and neoadjuvant therapies in order to shed light on most suitable adjuvant therapy. The findings of this review include the following: The use of interferon-α2b will be restricted for patients with ulcerated primary melanoma in countries with no access to new drugs in adjuvant therapy. Ipilimumab should not be considered as the first-line therapy due to its lower efficacy and severe toxicity. The use of anti-programmed death-1 antibody would be a relevant adjuvant therapy for patients without BRAF mutation. If the BRAF mutation status is positive, the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib is a plausible option. The establishment of appropriate therapeutic planning and clinical endpoints in adjuvant therapy should affect the standard of care. The choice of optimal adjuvant therapy for individual patients is an important issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiko Wada-Ohno
- Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, -1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
| | - Takamichi Ito
- Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, -1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Masutaka Furue
- Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, -1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eigentler TK, Mühlenbein C, Follmann M, Schadendorf D, Garbe C. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Melanoms - Update 2015/2016, Kurzversion 2.0. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2017; 15:e1-e41. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
3
|
Theodore JE, Frankel AJ, Thomas JM, Barbour AP, Bayley GJ, Allan CP, Wagels M, Smithers BM. Assessment of morbidity following regional nodal dissection in the axilla and groin for metastatic melanoma. ANZ J Surg 2017; 87:44-48. [PMID: 27102082 DOI: 10.1111/ans.13526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Revised: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assessed and compared the morbidity of nodal dissection in the axilla and groin including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), completion lymph node dissection for a positive SLNB (CLND) and therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) with and without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). METHODS Patients who had nodal dissection in the axilla or groin for cutaneous melanoma over an 18-year period (1995-2013) were prospectively documented on a database. The median follow-up was nearly 3 years. Early complications and clinically relevant lymphoedema were retrospectively analysed to assess the incidence and differences between the region and type of nodal surgery. RESULTS Included were 1521 patients following nodal dissection in the axilla (916 patients) and groin (605 patients). Less early complications occurred following SLNB in the axilla compared with the groin (5% versus 14%, P = 0.0001). Early complications were similar for CLND and TLND in the groin (49% versus 43%, P = 0.879) and axilla (28% versus 33%, P = 0.607). Moderate to severe lymphoedema rates were similar following axillary SLNB and CLND (6% versus 8%, P = 0.407). The lymphoedema rate for groin SLNB was lower than CLND (10% versus 20%, P = 0.063). No significant difference in lymphoedema rates followed CLND and TLND in each region. Following TLND, RT increased lymphoedema rates. CONCLUSIONS Morbidity may occur following SLNB with the groin having a higher rate of early complications and lymphoedema compared with the axilla. The morbidity following CLND and TLND were similar. Lymphoedema rates were increased following RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Theodore
- The Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Adam J Frankel
- The Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Janine M Thomas
- The Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Mater Research Institute, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew P Barbour
- The Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gerard J Bayley
- The Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christopher P Allan
- The Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Wagels
- The Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - B Mark Smithers
- The Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Mater Research Institute, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Treatment of Regional Metastatic Melanoma of Unknown Primary Origin. Cancers (Basel) 2015; 7:1543-53. [PMID: 26266423 PMCID: PMC4586782 DOI: 10.3390/cancers7030849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Revised: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the recurrence and survival rates of metastatic melanoma of unknown primary origin (MUP), in order to further refine current recommendations for the surgical treatment; (2) Methods: Medical data of all MUP patients registered between 2000 and 2011, were analyzed. Seventy-eight patients were categorized in either lymph node (axilla, groin, head-and neck) or subcutaneous MUP. Axillary node MUPs were generally treated with dissections of levels I-III, inguinal node MUPs with combined superficial and deep groin dissections, and head-and-neck node MUPs with neck dissections to various extents, based on lymph drainage patterns. Subcutaneous lesions were excised with 1–2 cm margins. The primary outcome was treatment outcomes in terms of (loco)regional recurrence and survival rates; (3) Results: Lymph node MUP recurred regionally in 11% of patients, with an overall recurrence rate of 45%. In contrast, subcutaneous MUP recurred locally in 65% of patients with an overall recurrence rate of 78%. This latter group had a significantly shorter disease-free interval than patients with lymph node MUP (p = 0.000). In the entire study population, 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 56% and 47% respectively, with no differences observed between the various subgroups; (4) Conclusion: The relatively low regional recurrence rate after regional lymph node dissection (11%) supports its current status as standard surgical treatment for lymph node MUP. Subcutaneous MUP, on the contrary, appears to recur both locally (65%) and overall (78%) at a significantly higher rate, suggesting a different biological behavior. However, wide local excision remains the best available option for this specific group.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pföhler C, Vogt T, Müller CSL. [Malignant head and neck melanoma: Part 2: Therapy]. HNO 2015. [PMID: 26219523 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-015-0034-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Resection margins of melanomas in the head and neck region often have to be adapted according anatomical circumstances. In the case of thicker primary tumors or after complete resection of locoregional lymph node metastases, adjuvant therapy with interferon-α can be performed; in some cases, adjuvant radiotherapy may also be indicated. In the case of inoperable lymph node or distant metastases, systemic treatment is required. Beside well-established mono- or polychemotherapy regimens, newer targeted therapies with BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib), mitogenic-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors (trametinib, binimetinib, and cobimetinib), and kinase inhibitors (imatinib, sunitinib, nilotinib, dasatinib) are also available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pföhler
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrbergerstrasse, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Although melanoma was historically thought to be radiation resistant, there are limited data to support the use of adjuvant radiation therapy for certain situations at increased risk for locoregional recurrence. High-risk primary tumor features include thickness, ulceration, certain anatomic locations, satellitosis, desmoplastic/neurotropic features, and head and neck mucosal and anorectal melanoma. Lentigo maligna can be effectively treated with either adjuvant or definitive radiation therapy. Some retrospective and prospective randomized studies support the use of adjuvant radiation to improve regional control after lymph node dissection for high-risk nodal metastatic disease. Consensus on the optimal radiation doses and fractionation is lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Oxenberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - John M Kane
- Melanoma-Sarcoma Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Follmann M, Schadendorf D, Kochs C, Buchberger B, Winter A, Wesselmann S. Quality assurance for care of melanoma patients based on guideline-derived quality indicators and certification. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2013; 12:139-47. [PMID: 24238575 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.12238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 09/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In 2013 the first German S-3 guidelines on the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of melanoma were published in the framework of the German Guideline Program on Oncology. Quality indicators were developed at the same time as the guideline development process in order to implement the guideline recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary, interprofessional working group developed quality indicators following a standardized process. RESULTS Twelve quality indicators directly linked to guideline recommendations were generated and agreed on by consensus. They were integrated into the catalogue of requirements for dermato-oncological centers certified by the German Cancer Society. CONCLUSIONS The close cooperation between the guideline group and commission for certification allowed the guideline contents to be implemented in the form of quality indicators in everyday clinical practice. Adherence to the guidelines is required and continuously evaluated as part of certification.
Collapse
|